Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial

Relationship Between T790M Allele Frequency and Therapeutic Effects Before and After EGFR-TKI Administration Using Droplet Digital PCR in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutation

Background/Aim

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of sequential treatment with afatinib and osimertinib by clarifying the correlation between therapeutic effects and EGFR T790M mutant allele frequency.

Patients and Methods

From August 2013 to July 2019, tumor samples from before and after epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) administration were collected from patients from eight institutions. We measured T790M mutant allele frequency using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction using biopsy specimens from patients mainly treated with afatinib and analyzed the T790M to EGFR-activating mutation ratio (T/A ratio) in pre- and post-biopsy tissue.

Results

Among 36 patients (afatinib group: n=24, first-generation EGFR-TKI group: n=12) with preserved pre- and post-biopsy tissue, the median T/A ratios before (pre-T/A ratio) and after EGFR-TKI administration (post-T/A ratio) in the afatinib group were 0.005 and 0.014, and those in the first-generation EGFR-TKI group were 0.026 and 0.352, respectively. The results of a Mann-Whitney U-test revealed that the difference between the pre-T/A and post-T/A ratios was not higher in the afatinib group than in the first-generation EGFR-TKI (p=0.0372). No significant difference in progression-free or overall survival was found between the two groups.

Conclusion

Compared with first-generation EGFR-TKI treatment, treatment with afatinib did not affect changes in the T/A ratio.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Common Mutations: New Strategies

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are described in 10-15% of Caucasian patients and in 50% of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the therapeutic scenario and has changed the natural history of the disease. Despite the results obtained with osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, most patients experience disease progression. The search for new therapeutic strategies both to enhance first-line treatment and to ensure adequate second-line therapies represents an unmet medical need, towards which all efforts are being concentrated. In this review, we describe the main strategies identified to improve the prognosis of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Adverse event profiles of EGFR-TKI: network meta-analysis and disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database

Background

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in clinical use show promise but can cause AEs, impacting patients' wellbeing and increasing costs.

Methods

This study utilized two methods: network meta-analysis (NMA) and disproportionality analysis (DA). For NMA, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to 10 September 2024, for phase II/III RCTs comparing EGFR-TKI monotherapy with chemotherapy or other EGFR-TKIs. Using STATA 18.0, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and assessed heterogeneity via Chi-squared and I2 tests. Adverse events (AEs) were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). For DA, we analyzed FAERS data (January 2004-June 2024), evaluating AE signals with reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% CIs; signals were considered significant if the ROR and its 95% CI lower bound exceeded 1. Primary outcomes for NMA included all-grade AEs, grade ≥3 AEs, specific AEs, and AE-related mortality. For DA, outcomes included EGFR-TKI as the primary AE cause, time from treatment to AE, and AE-related mortality.

Results

NMA: 48% of EGFR-TKI patients experienced AEs, with 32.7% being severe. Afatinib showed highest toxicity; Icotinib was safest. Osimertinib was associated with highest risks of leukopenia (8%) and thrombocytopenia (9%). DA: Osimertinib had strongest links to cardiac diseases and blood/lymphatic disorders. Gefitinib had the strongest signal for interstitial lung diseases; Erlotinib for anorexia. Most AEs occurred within 30 days, but cardiac disorders had a median onset of 41 days. Osimertinib had the highest AE-related mortality, with cardiac disorders leading in fatalities.

Conclusion

This study used NMA and DA to explore EGFR-TKI-related AEs. Drugs varied in AE profiles, mostly mild, but Osimertinib and Dacomitinib were associated with more severe events. Osimertinib carried a high cardiac risk, delayed onset, and high mortality. Thus, comprehensive patient assessment and close monitoring are crucial with EGFR-TKI use.

Debate on first-line treatment strategies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation: An expert panel meeting by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology (AIOT)

BACKGROUND

The front-line treatment options and regulatory approval scenario for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have rapidly evolved in the recent months, with newly presented positive trial results of novel compounds and combination strategies in the setting of common activating mutations, uncommon mutations, and exon 20 insertions. In this context, international lively debate is emerging on how to choose among the available regimens, based on efficacy and safety results.

METHODS

A virtual International Expert Panel was held in July 2024 to review data on front-line regimens in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, including common, uncommon and exon 20 insertions. The panel discussed available evidence, and reached common considerations for clinical practice and clinical research.

RESULTS

In the setting of EGFR common activating mutations, all panelists agreed that single agent osimertinib, the combination of osimertinib with platinum-pemetrexed, and the combination of amivantamab and lazertinib, are first-line treatment options. Overall, panelists defined characteristics of patients in which combination treatments should be avoided. Subsequent treatment strategies at disease progression were discussed according to the different front-line options. With regards to uncommon EGFR mutations, panelists agreed that afatinib remains the only drug with phase 3 results available, and that afatinib and osimertinib are the preferred first-line options. In EGFR exon20 insertion positive disease, the combination of carboplatin, pemetrexed and amivantamab has been identified as the preferred front-line treatment, with second-line amivantamab to be used in the second-line setting whenever not available in front-line. The panelists defined priorities in clinical research, with high priority attributed to investigating resistance mechanisms, novel generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and selection biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Different toxicity profiles and sequential strategies were considered, together with efficacy results, to reach common considerations for the front-line treatment strategies in EGFR mutant NSCLC, however clinical research should be prioritized to identify further selection features.

Investigating osimertinib plus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, 15-40% of advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) have an activating EGFR mutation, treatable with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as osimertinib, recommended as front-line therapy. Despite the efficacy of first-line osimertinib, most patients will experience disease progression. Therefore, combining it with chemotherapy has become an area of interest.

AREAS COVERED

Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-TKI that has extended survival in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. However, resistance eventually leads to treatment failure. This has driven the advancement of strategies to overcome resistance to osimertinib. In this setting, the FLAURA2 trial yielded positive results by combining osimertinib with chemotherapy. Additionally, a range of other approaches, including the use of bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates alongside third-generation EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy, support the development of novel therapeutic combinations, some of which have already been approved for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.

EXPERT OPINION

Next to osimertinib monotherapy, expanded upfront treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC require patient selection considering disease extent, toxicity and tolerability, dosing schedule and what the patient can expect through shared decision-making. Further studies are needed to identify the patients who will benefit the most from combination therapies and to sequence the new drugs into the treatment algorithm.

Patients with non‑small cell lung cancer with the exon 21 L858R mutation: From distinct mechanisms to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments (Review)

The most common oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations, which are more common in Asian (30-50%) than in Caucasian (10-15%) populations. Exon 19 deletion (ex19del) and exon 21 L858R (ex21 L858R) mutations account for ~45 and 40% of all EGFR mutations, respectively. Moreover, EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may be more effective and improve the quality of life of patients with NSCLC more than chemotherapy regimens. By contrast, patients with the ex21 L858R mutation may have a lower sensitivity and duration of response to EGFR-TKIs as well as a shorter survival compared with those with the ex19del mutation. However, current guidelines classify ex21 L858R and ex19del as the same condition and recommend the same treatment strategy for both. Aiming for precision medicine, the present review introduces and compares different EGFR-TKIs for the ex21 L858R mutation to assess more personalized treatment options for the population with this mutation.

A Bayesian network meta-analysis of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Background

To date, no direct comparisons have been performed to compare the effectiveness of all epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) against EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Methods

We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing osimertinib, lazertinib, aumolertinib, befotertinib, furmonertinib, dacomitinib, afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, icotinib, and chemotherapy. Pooled estimations of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and toxicity (grade ≥ 3 adverse events) were performed within the Bayesian framework.

Results

Twenty-three trials involving 11 treatments were included. All EGFR-TKIs improved PFS relative to chemotherapy, except for icotinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.44). All EGFR-TKIs demonstrated significant ORR benefits over chemotherapy. Osimertinib seemed to prolong PFS compared with icotinib (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.1-0.86), gefitinib (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.21-0.74), and erlotinib (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-1.0). In addition, osimertinib showed favorable superiority in improving OS compared with chemotherapy (HR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.43-0.82), gefitinib (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.45-0.83), erlotinib (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48-0.89), and afatinib (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94). Among these regimens, afatinib showed the highest ORR (cumulative probability: 96.96%). Icotinib was associated with minimal toxicity among the EGFR-TKIs, followed by furmonertinib and osimertinib. Moreover, the toxicity spectra differed among the EGFR-TKIs. Subgroup analyses of patients with two common types of EGFR mutations indicated that furmonertinib possessed the greatest PFS benefit in patients with exon 19 deletion, and lazertinib showed the greatest PFS benefit in patients with Leu858Arg mutation. We also identified differences between EGFR-TKIs in prolonging PFS in patients with brain metastasis.

Conclusions

Osimertinib is the first choice of treatment with considerable efficacy and safety for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. The treatments associated with the best PFS in patients with exon 19 deletions and Leu858Arg mutations were furmonertinib and lazertinib, respectively.

Osimertinib in the Treatment of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Early and Locally Advanced Stages of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

The treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was dramatically revolutionized by the introduction of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in clinical practice, both in advanced and locally advanced/early stages. The present work focuses on osimertinib use in locally advanced and early NSCLC stages. Phase 3 clinical trials have supported the use of osimertinib as the new standard of care, both in the adjuvant setting and in locally advanced disease. The ADAURA study reported an overall survival (OS) advantage for adjuvant osimertinib in completely resected stage II-IIIA EGFR-mutant tumors, while the LAURA study proved a statistically significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) and a delay of central nervous system metastasis development in EGFR-mutant patients treated with osimertinib maintenance after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease. In the neoadjuvant setting, data on osimertinib's efficacy are conflicting; therefore, the Neo-ADAURA study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant osimertinib alone or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with stage II-IIIB NSCLC and common EGFR mutations. We discuss several issues that need to be clarified, such as the efficacy of the drug on uncommon mutations, the long-term impact on survival, and the management of resistance mechanisms. Moreover, we report the studies that are trying to identify potential biomarkers of response, such as the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), with the aim of selecting patients who will benefit most from osimertinib.

Non-small cell lung cancer and the tumor microenvironment: making headway from targeted therapies to advanced immunotherapy

Over the past decades, significant progress has been made in the understanding of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) biology and tumor progression mechanisms, resulting in the development of novel strategies for early detection and wide-ranging care approaches. Since their introduction, over 20 years ago, targeted therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape for NSCLC. Nowadays, targeted therapies remain the gold standard for many patients, but still they suffer from many adverse effects, including unexpected toxicity and intrinsic acquired resistance mutations, which lead to relapse. The adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in 2015, has offered exceptional survival benefits for patients without targetable alterations. Despite this notable progress, challenges remain, as not all patients respond favorably to ICIs, and resistance to therapy can develop over time. A crucial factor influencing clinical response to immunotherapy is the tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME is pivotal in orchestrating the interactions between neoplastic cells and the immune system, influencing tumor growth and treatment outcomes. In this review, we discuss how the understanding of this intricate relationship is crucial for the success of immunotherapy and survey the current state of immunotherapy intervention, with a focus on forthcoming and promising chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies in NSCLC. The TME sets major obstacles for CAR-T therapies, creating conditions that suppress the immune response, inducing T cell exhaustion. To enhance treatment efficacy, specific efforts associated with CAR-T cell therapy in NSCLC, should definitely focus TME-related immunosuppression and antigen escape mechanisms, by combining CAR-T cells with immune checkpoint blockades.

Exploring the binding characteristics between lorlatinib and human alpha-1-acid glycoprotein: Multispectral and molecular modeling techniques

Approval in 2019 was granted for the highly selective, targeted agent lorlatinib, which primary target is ROS1 and ALK. The purpose of this work was to examine the binding mechanism between lorlatinib (LOR) and HAG employing multispectral and molecular modeling techniques. Fluorescence data demonstrated that LOR quenched HAG fluorescence as a static quenching, interecalated into the hydrophobic cavity of HAG with a moderate affinity. Thermodynamic and competitive experiments pointed out that LOR bound with HAG primarily through hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic, and van der Waals forces. Circular dichroism, three-dimensional and synchronous fluorescence spectroscopic studies noted that the secondary structure of HAG and microenvironments around tyrosine (Tyr) and tryptophan (Trp) residues were altered due to binding with LOR. The contribution of each energy involved in binding process of LOR and HAG has been analyzed by molecular simulation techniques. Besides, the environmental conditions with metal ions have also been studied. The present study is expected to provide a theoretical basis for further studying the metabolism of LOR in vivo, which may help to gain a deeper understanding of the general pharmacological activity of the drug.

Rebiopsy Enhances Survival with Afatinib vs. Osimertinib in EGFR Exon 19 Deletion Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Afatinib and Osimertinib are first-line treatments for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but their comparative efficacies and the patient groups that benefit the most remain unclear. This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of first-line Afatinib and Osimertinib in NSCLC patients with EGFR 19del and no brain metastases at diagnosis.

METHODS

The primary endpoints were time on treatment (ToT) and overall survival (OS). Survival analyses were performed for three groups: Afatinib followed by Osimertinib, Afatinib followed by other therapies, and Osimertinib (alone or followed by other therapies). Rebiopsy practices, including T790M mutation detection, were also analyzed in patients with disease progression on Afatinib.

RESULTS

Among 97 Afatinib-treated and 60 Osimertinib-treated patients, Osimertinib showed a significantly longer ToT (23.3 vs. 16.5 months; p = 0.007). Median OS was numerically higher for Afatinib with sequential Osimertinib (40.5 vs. 34.6 months for Osimertinib; p = 0.473). Osimertinib demonstrated advantages, with fewer brain metastases upon progression and fewer adverse effects. In the Afatinib group, 64% of patients with disease progression underwent rebiopsy, with 39% testing positive for T790M mutation and subsequently receiving Osimertinib. Rebiopsy was most frequently performed on the lung parenchyma using non-surgical methods.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, Osimertinib achieved a significantly longer ToT compared to Afatinib in NSCLC patients with EGFR 19del and no brain metastases. The sequential use of Afatinib followed by Osimertinib showed a trend toward improved OS, highlighting the importance of rebiopsy for identifying T790M mutations to guide subsequent therapy.

What is the optimal first-line regimen for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

There are currently various tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based regimens available, and it can be challenging for clinicians to determine the most effective and safe option due to the lack of direct comparisons between these regimens. In this study, we conducted a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of distinct regimens to determine the optimal regimen for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer, thereby facilitating clinical decision-making.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases and international conference databases were comprehensively searched from their inception to 02 April 2024 for collecting data regarding efficacy and safety from eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Following literature screening and data extraction, a NMA was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety among 21 regimens with a random-effects consistency model in a Bayesian framework using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation technique within the GEMTC package.

RESULTS

A total of 35 RCTs were included, involving 9718 individuals and 21 regimens. Compared with other interventions, combination therapies based on third-generation TKIs, especially osimertinib plus ramucirumab, showed the most favorable PFS prolongation in overall patients. Consistently, subgroup analyses showed that third-generation TKIs-based combination regimens were superior to other regimens in most prespecified subgroups with distinct clinicopathological characteristics. In terms of overall survival, despite the combination regimens based on third-generation TKIs also showing relatively superior outcomes, erlotinib plus chemotherapy and gefitinib plus chemotherapy were ranked more favorably. In terms of safety profile, combination therapies based on third-generation TKIs did not significantly increase the incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events compared with other regimens.

CONCLUSION

Our study concluded that combination regimens based on third-generation TKIs (osimertinib plus ramucirumab, osimertinib plus chemotherapy, osimertinib plus bevacizumab, amivantamab plus lazertinib and aumolertinib plus apatinib) could be the new and clinically preferable first-line, standard of care for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023480596).

Specifying the choice of EGFR-TKI based on brain metastatic status for advanced NSCLC with EGFR p.L861Q mutation

BACKGROUND

In-depth insight into the genomic features of the uncommon EGFR p.L861Q mutant NSCLC is scarcely performed, and no consensus on the preferred treatment strategy has been established. Moreover, the therapeutic implications of EGFR-TKI stratified by clinical and molecular features remained largely unknown.

METHODS

A multi-center NGS database comprising 44,993 NSCLC samples was utilized for the genomic landscape profiling of EGFR p.L861Q mutation. Furthermore, a real-world cohort of 207 patients harboring EGFR p.L861Q mutation with complete treatment history was curated for comprehensive clinical analysis.

RESULTS

L861Q is prevalent in approximately 2.1% of EGFR-mutated NSCLC and is typically co-mutated with EGFR p.G719X on the same allele (20%) and exhibits co-occurrent EGFR copy number amplification in approximately 17% of cases. In the first-line setting, afatinib and third-generation EGFR-TKI have been shown to yield notably superior treatment outcomes compared to first-generation EGFR-TKI (1st vs.2nd vs.3rd generations, ORR: 15.8% vs.56.5% vs.46.7%, P=0.01; median PFS: 6.4 vs.13.5 vs.15.1 months, P=0.002). This finding consistently held for patients without CNS metastases (1st vs.2nd vs.3rd generations, median PFS:6.0 vs.18.2 vs.14.1 months, P=0.003). In contrast, third-generation EGFR-TKI demonstrated superior efficacy compared to afatinib or first-generation TKI among the subgroup of brain metastasis (Pooled 1st/2nd-generation vs.3rd-generation TKI, brain ORR:0.00% vs.33.33%; median PFS:7.9 vs.19.3 months, P=0.021). Additional concurrent EGFR mutations or EGFR amplification did not yield a discernible impact on the efficacy of EGFR-TKI.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study comprehensively elucidates the molecular features of EGFR p.L861Q mutation and underscores the optimal therapeutic choice of first-line EGFR-TKI based on brain metastatic status.

Pericytes Modulate Third-Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Sensitivity in EGFR-Mutated Lung Cancer Cells Through IL32-β5-Integrin Paracrine Signaling

EGFR-mutated lung cancer patients sometimes display restricted responses to third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), potentially attributable to undervalued input from stromal cells, notably pericytes (PCs). The study shows that PCs isolated from EGFR-mutated patients have a unique secretome profile, notably secreting IL32 and affecting signaling pathways and biological processes linked to TKI sensitivity. Clinical evidence, supported by single-cell RNA sequencing and multiplex immunostaining of tumor tissues, confirms the presence of IL32-expressing pericytes closely interacting with β5-integrin-expressing cancer cells in EGFR-mutated patients, impacting therapeutic response and prognosis. Co-culture and conditioned medium experiments demonstrate that PCs reduce TKI effectiveness in EGFR-mutated cancer cells, a reversible phenomenon through silencing IL32 expression in PCs or depleting the IL32 receptor β5-integrin on cancer cells, thereby restoring cancer cell sensitivity. Mechanistically, it is shown that YY1 signaling upregulates IL32 secretion in PCs, subsequently activating the β5-integrin-Src-Akt pathway in EGFR-mutated cancer cells, contributing to their TKI sensitivity. In animal studies, co-injection of cancer cells with PCs compromises TKI effectiveness, independently of blood vessel functions, while inhibition of β5-integrin restores tumor cell sensitivity. Overall, the findings highlight direct crosstalk between cancer cells and pericytes, impacting TKI sensitivity via IL32-β5-integrin paracrine signaling, proposing an enhanced therapeutic approach for EGFR-mutated patients.

Real-World Survival Outcomes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Impact of Genomic Testing and Targeted Therapies in a Latin American Middle-Income Country

PURPOSE

Targeted therapies are indicated for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and driver tumor mutations. However, real-world studies on the survival benefits of these agents are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of targeted therapies matched to a genomic alteration on the survival of patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 446 patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent next-generation sequencing between 2016 and 2023 at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología in Mexico. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

For the entire cohort, the PFS and OS were 10.71 months (95% CI, 9.35 to 12.06) and 47.77 months (95% CI, 29.67 to 65.86). PFS was significantly longer in patients with actionable mutations treated with targeted therapies (19.41 months [95% CI, 14.27 to 24.55]; P < .001) than in patients without actionable mutations (6.4 months [95% CI, 4.4 to 8.4]) or not treated with targeted therapies (6.6 months [95% CI, 5.3 to 7.89]). Similarly, OS was significantly longer in patients with actionable mutations treated with targeted therapies (89.69 months [95% CI, 45.54 to 133.84]; P < .001) than in patients without actionable mutations (17.11 months [95% CI, 8.65 to 25.57]) or not treated with targeted therapies (22.3 months [95% CI, 12.48 to 32.1]). Survival gains were driven by significant improvements in PFS and OS in patients with EGFR and ALK mutations.

CONCLUSION

This real-world data analysis demonstrated that targeted therapies improve the survival of patients with NSCLC with actionable mutations, which supports a recommendation for widening access to broad-based genomic testing and targeted therapies.

Advancements in fourth-generation EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: Bridging biological insights and therapeutic development

Third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR activating mutations, with improved long-term outcomes compared to first-generation TKIs. Nevertheless, disease progression inevitably occurs, limiting osimertinib long-term efficacy. Indeed, the molecular biology underlying acquired resistance to first-line osimertinib is multifaceted and includes the emergence of on-target and off-target alterations. EGFR-C797S mutation represents the most frequent mechanism of on-target resistance and hinders drug binding to the target site. EGFR-independent resistance includes the activation of alternative signaling pathways, such as MET amplification and HER2 mutations, and histological transformation. In this setting, chemotherapy is the current therapeutic option, with modest clinical outcomes. Therefore, the development of novel therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance to osimertinib is a major challenge. In this setting, fourth-generation TKIs are emerging as an interesting therapeutic option to overcome on-target resistance. Preclinical drug development has led to the discovery of thiazole-amid inhibitors, which activity is mediated by the allosteric inhibition of EGFR, resulting in high specificity towards mutant-EGFR. Early phase 1/2 clinical trials are ongoing to elucidate their activity also in the clinical setting. Aim of this review is to provide a state-of-the-art analysis on preclinical development of fourth-generation EGFR-TKIs and promising preliminary clinical data.

The prediction of treatment outcome in NSCLC patients harboring an EGFR exon 20 mutation using molecular modeling

INTRODUCTION

The structural effect of uncommon heterogenous in-frame deletion and/or insertion mutations within exon 20 (EGFRex20+) in relation to therapy response is poorly understood. This study aims to elucidate the structural alterations caused by EGFRex20+ mutations and correlate these changes with patient responses.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We selected EGFRex20+ mutations from advanced NSCLC patients in the Position20 and AFACET studies for computational analysis. Homology models representing both inactive and active conformations of these mutations were generated using the Swiss-Model server. Molecular docking studies with EGFR-TKIs was conducted using smina, followed by Molecular Dynamic (MD) simulations performed with GROMACS. These computational findings were compared with clinical outcomes to evaluate their potential in predicting patient response.

RESULTS

Our docking studies of 29 EGFRex20+ mutations revealed that the binding energies of afatinib, osimertinib, zipalertinib, and sunvozertinib, compared to the wild type, do not significantly impact either TKI's efficacy. MD simulations for eight EGFRex20+ mutations (A763_Y764insFQEA, A767_V769dup, S768_D770dup, D770_N771insG, D770_P772dup, N771_H773dup, H773_V774insY and H773_V774delinsLM) revealed varying degrees of instability. For six variants, predicted activation based on the αC-helix stability and orientation, as well as TKI sensitivity, aligned well with clinical observations from the Position20 and AFACET studies. Two mutations (D770_N771insG and N771_H773dup) predicted as poor to moderate responders, showed minimal activation of the αC-helix region, warranting further investigation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, MD simulations can effectively predict patient outcomes by connecting computational results with clinical data and advancing our understanding of EGFR mutations and their therapeutic responses.

Evaluation of the prognostic value of the new 9th edition Tumor-Node-Metastases (TNM) staging system for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients with bone metastases

BACKGROUND

There are some changes in the new 9th edition Tumor-Node-Metastases (TNM) staging system for lung cancer, including subdividing M1c into M1c1 and M1c2 stage. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic performance of the updated classification system and try to provide some real-world application data among advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with bone metastases.

METHODS

Advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients in M1c stage with bone metastases who receiving first-line first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) and T790M-guided osimertinib as the second-line therapy were retrospectively screened from December 2016 to December 2021. A total of 126 patients were enrolled in this study. 62 patients and 64 patients were subdivided into M1c1 and M1c2 groups according to the 9th edition of TNM staging system.The first-line real-world progression-free survival (1LrwPFS), the second-line real-world progression-free survival (2LrwPFS), post-progression survival (PPS) and real-world overall survival (rwOS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall median rwOS was 40.1 months (95% CI 35.996-44.204). 1LrwPFS was 13.9 months (95% CI 12.653-15.147) and 2LrwPFS was 14.5 months (95% CI 11.665-17.335) for all patients.Patients in M1c2 stage was inferior to M1c1 stage patients in rwOS (35.2 months vs. 42.9 months, HR = 0.512, P = 0.005). 2LrwPFS was moderately correlated with rwOS (r = 0.621, R2 = 0.568, P = 0.000). Multivariate analysis showed performance status (PS) score ≥ 2 and TP53 alteration positive were independent prognostic factors of worse rwOS.

CONCLUSIONS

More refined stratification of M1c according to the 9th edition of TNM staging system is conducive to the judgment of prognosis and the implementation of precision medicine for patients.

First-line treatment of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluates first-line treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. We analyzed 24 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2,682 patients, comparing various EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and combination therapies. Direct comparisons showed that the addition of bevacizumab or chemotherapy to first-generation (1G) EGFR-TKIs improved overall survival (OS) compared to 1G TKIs alone, with HRs of 0.704 (95% CI: 0.433-0.973) and 0.682 (95% CI: 0.464-0.899), respectively. However, third-generation (3G) TKI monotherapy did not significantly improve OS compared with 1G TKIs, with an HR of 0.855 (95% CI: 0.511-1.198). Indirect comparisons suggested that the combination of 3G TKIs with chemotherapy provided the most significant improvements in OS and progression-free survival (PFS), significantly outperforming 3G TKIs, with HRs of OS 1.69 (95% CI: 1.14-3.4) and PFS 2.13 (95% CI: 1.28-3.54). Intracranial PFS was best with 1G TKIs plus bevacizumab. Our findings suggest that 3G EGFR-TKIs in combination with chemotherapy may be the most effective strategy for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and brain metastases, though further head-to-head trials are needed for validation.

Appropriate delay of primary tumour radiotherapy may lead to better long-term overall survival for non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR-TKIs

PURPOSE

The most appropriate time of primary tumor radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) with EGFR-TKIs remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the time factor of primary tumor radiotherapy on long-term overall survival(OS)and provide a theoretical basis for further clinical research.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 238 patients with EGFR-TKIs and OS ≥ 12 months were statistically analysed. Patients were grouped: the D group without primary tumor radiotherapy and the R group with it.The R group were divided into three groups according to the interval between the start of EGFR-TKIs and the start of primary tumor radiotherapy: R0 - 30(<30 days), R30 - PD(≥ 30 days and disease stable), and RPD(radiotherapy after disease progression). The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analyses. Exploratory landmark analyses were investigated.

RESULTS

The OS rates at 1, 2, 3, 5 years for the R group and D group were 96.8%, 62.9%, 38.3%, 17.1%, and 95.6%, 37.7%, 21.8%, 2.9%, respectively; the corresponding MST was 29 months(95% CI: 24.3-33.7) for the R group and 22 months(95% CI: 20.4-23.6) for the D group (χ2 = 13.480, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that primary tumor radiotherapy was independent predictors of prolonged OS.Among the four groups, The R30 - PD appeared to have the best OS (D, χ2 = 19.307, p<0.001;R0 - 30, χ2 = 11.687, p = 0.01; RPD, χ2 = 4.086, p = 0.043). Landmark analyses(22 months) showed the R30 - PD group had a significant long-term OS.The incidence of radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 2 was17.3%(n = 19)and radiation esophagitis ≥ grade 2 was observed in 32 patients(29.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that primary tumour radiotherapy may prolong long-term OS with acceptable toxicities. Appropriate delay(R30 - PD)of primary tumour radiotherapy may be the best choice.Premature radiotherapy(R0 - 30) and radiotherapy after disease progression (RPD)may not be reasonable for long-term OS.

Prognostic impact of concomitant pH-regulating drugs in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project 01-S1

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the prognostic impact of concomitant pH-regulating drug use in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study and reviewed clinical data of consecutive patients with NSCLC treated with the first-line EGFR-TKIs in 46 hospitals between April 2010 and March 2020. Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine the differences in overall survival (OS) between patients treated with and without concomitant pH-regulating drugs, including potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs).

RESULTS

A total of 758 patients were included in the final dataset, of which 307 (40%) were administered concomitant pH-regulating drugs while receiving frontline EGFR-TKIs. After adjusting for basic patient characteristics, patients administered gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib with concomitant pH-regulating drugs had lower OS than those without concomitant pH-regulating drugs, with hazard ratios of 1.74 (with a 95% confidence interval of 1.34-2.27), 1.33 (0.80-2.22), 1.73 (0.89-3.36), and 5.04 (1.38-18.44), respectively. The 2-year OS rates of patients receiving gefitinib with or without concomitant pH-regulating drugs were 65.4 and 77.5%, those for erlotinib were 55.8 and 66.6%, and those for afatinib were 63.2 and 76.9%, respectively. The 1-year OS rates of patients receiving osimertinib with or without concomitant pH-regulating drugs were 88.1% and 96.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In addition to the first-generation EGFR-TKIs, the second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs also resulted in OS deterioration in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC when used concurrently with pH-regulating drugs.

Prediction of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Subtypes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer From Hematoxylin and Eosin-Stained Slides Using Deep Learning

Accurate assessment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and subtype is critical for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients. Conventional molecular testing methods for detecting EGFR mutations have limitations. In this study, an artificial intelligence-powered deep learning framework was developed for the weakly supervised prediction of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer from hematoxylin and eosin-stained histopathology whole-slide images. The study cohort was partitioned into training and validation subsets. Foreground regions containing tumor tissue were extracted from whole-slide images. A convolutional neural network employing a contrastive learning paradigm was implemented to extract patch-level morphologic features. These features were aggregated using a vision transformer-based model to predict EGFR mutation status and classify patient cases. The established prediction model was validated on unseen data sets. In internal validation with a cohort from the University of Science and Technology of China (n = 172), the model achieved patient-level areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.927 and 0.907, sensitivities of 81.6% and 83.3%, and specificities of 93.0% and 92.3%, for surgical resection and biopsy specimens, respectively, in EGFR mutation subtype prediction. External validation with cohorts from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (n = 193) yielded patient-level AUCs of 0.849 and 0.867, sensitivities of 79.2% and 80.7%, and specificities of 91.7% and 90.7% for surgical and biopsy specimens, respectively. Further validation with The Cancer Genome Atlas data set (n = 81) showed an AUC of 0.861, a sensitivity of 84.6%, and a specificity of 90.5%. Deep learning solutions demonstrate potential advantages for automated, noninvasive, fast, cost-effective, and accurate inference of EGFR alterations from histomorphology. Integration of such artificial intelligence frameworks into routine digital pathology workflows could augment existing molecular testing pipelines.

Treatment sequences in EGFR mutant advanced NSCLC

Common EGFR gene mutations (exon 19 deletion and L858R in exon 21) are the most frequent cause of actionable genomic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The introduction of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as 1st-line treatment of advanced stages of the disease has changed the natural history of the disease and extended survival rates, establishing third generation TKIs as a new standard of frontline treatment. Nonetheless, the prolongation of overall survival remains modest, as multiple escape pathways and tumor increasing heterogeneity inevitably develop over time. Several strategies are currently developed to improve these patients' outcome: prevent the emergence of resistance mechanisms by therapeutic combinations introduced from the first line, act on the residual disease at the time of maximum response to 1st line treatment, develop therapeutic strategies at the time of acquired resistance to TKIs, either dependent on the resistance mechanisms, or agnostic of the resistance pathways. Recent advancements in treatment combinations have shown promising results in prolonging progression-free survival, but often at the cost of more severe side effects in comparison with the current standard of care. These emerging new treatment options open up possibilities for diverse therapeutic sequences in the management of advanced NSCLC depending on common EGFR mutations. The impact on the disease natural history, the patients' survival and quality of life is not yet fully understood. In this review, we propose an overview of published and forthcoming advances, and a management algorithm considering the different first-line options, integrating the clinical and biological parameters that are critical to clinicians' decision-making process.

Understanding the treatment response and resistance to targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer: clinical insights and perspectives

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common subtype of lung cancer with a generally poor prognosis. In recent years, advances in targeted therapy and sequencing technology have brought significant improvement in the therapeutic outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC. Targeted inhibitors directed against specific mutated or rearranged oncogenes, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and receptor tyrosine kinase ROS proto-oncogene 1(ROS1) among others, exhibit promising anti-tumor activity. Unfortunately, some patients develop acquired resistance and disease progression soon after initial remission. Despite the continuous development of new drugs and strategies to overcome drug resistance, it is still a major challenge in the treatment of NSCLC. The landscape of targeted therapy for NSCLC is evolving rapidly in response to the pace of scientific research. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive review of tumor target antigens and agents related to targeted therapy in NSCLC.

To establish a prognostic model of epidermal growth factor receptor mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients based on Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression

BACKGROUND

There is currently a shortage of effective diagnostic tools that are used for identifying long-term survival among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. This research utilized the development of a prognostic model to assist clinicians in forecasting the survival over 24 months.

METHODS

In Phase III and IV those patients who were diagnosed with EGFR mutation from January 2018 to June 2022 were enrolled into the lung cancer group of Thoracic Surgery Department of Hebei Provincial People's Hospital. Long-run survival was stated as survival for 24 months after being diagnosed. A multivariate prognostic pattern was constructed by means of internal validation and binary logistic regression by bootstrapping. One nomogram was created with a view to boosting the explanation and applicability of the pattern.

RESULTS

A total of 603 patients with EGFR mutation were registered. Elements linked to the whole survival beyond 24 months were age (OR 6.15); female (OR 1.79); functional status (ECOG 0-1) (OR 5.26); Exon 20 insertion mutation deletion (OR 2.08); No central nervous system metastasis (OR 2.66), targeted therapy (OR 0.43); Immunotherapy (OR 0.24). The model has good internal validation.

CONCLUSION

Seven pretreatment clinicopathological variables predicted survival over 24 months. That pattern owns a great discriminative capability. It is hypothesized that this pattern is capable of assisting in selecting the optimal treatment sequence for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

Combined Dacomitinib and Selpercatinib Treatment for a Patient with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Acquired CCDC6-RET Fusion

RET rearrangements are recognized drivers in lung cancer, representing a small subset (1-2%) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Additionally, RET fusions also serve as a rare acquired resistance mechanism in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Only a few NSCLC cases have been reported with co-occurrence of EGFR mutations and RET fusions as an acquired resistance mechanism induced by EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). A 68-year-old man diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR L858R mutation initially responded well to dacomitinib, a second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Afterward, he developed acquired resistance accompanied by a RET rearrangement. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis revealed that the tumor possessed both the new CCDC6-RET fusion and the EGFR L858R mutation. Subsequently, he was treated with a combination of cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab resulting in a partial response. Nevertheless, his condition deteriorated as the disease progressed, manifesting as hydrocephalus, accompanied by altered consciousness and lower limb weakness. The subsequent combined treatment with dacomitinib and selpercatinib resulted in a significant improvement in neurological symptoms. Here, we first identified acquired CCDC6-RET fusion with a coexisting EGFR L858R mutation following dacomitinib treatment. Our findings highlight the importance of NGS for identifying RET fusions and suggest the potential combination of dacomitinib and selpercatinib to overcome this resistance. For NSCLC patients with RET rearrangements and no access to RET inhibitors, pemetrexed-based chemotherapy provides a feasible alternative.

Lazertinib versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Failing EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor: A Real-World External Comparator Study

BACKGROUND

Lazertinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibit common EGFR mutation and T790M mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. No previous studies have compared lazertinib to platinum-based chemotherapy. We have compared lazertinib with platinum-based chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients after previous EGFR-TKI therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared 200 patients from LASER201, LASER301, and LASER-PMS studies to 334 patients who were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy after previous EGFR-TKI from the Samsung Medical Center. After propensity score matching (PSM), we selected 156 patients from each group. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of PFS was 15.61 months in the lazertinib group and 21.67 months in the external control group. The PFS was significantly longer in patients who were treated with lazertinib than those treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (10.97 months vs. 5.10 months; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-0.55; p < 0.01) after PSM. Lazertinib showed superior OS (32.23 months vs. 18.73 months; adjusted HR 0.45; 95% CI, 0.29-0.69; p < 0.001), ORR (64.1% vs. 47.4%), and TTD (11.66 months vs. 6.73 months; adjusted HR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.75; p < 0.001) compared to platinum-based chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Based on this retrospective, external control study, lazertinib has demonstrated significantly better efficacy compared with platinum-based chemotherapy. The external controls provide important context to evaluate efficacy in single-arm studies.

Precision nanomedicine to treat non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is a major cause of death worldwide, being often detected at a later stage due to the non-appearance of early symptoms. Therefore, specificity of the treatment is of utmost importance for its effective treatment. Precision medicine is a personalized therapy based on the genomics of the patient to design a suitable drug approach. Genetic mutations render the tumor resistant to specific mutations and the therapy is in vain even though correct medications are prescribed. Therefore, Precision medicine needs to be explored for the treatment of Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nanoparticles are widely explored to give personalized interventions to treat lung cancer due to their various advantages like the ability to reach cancer cells, enhanced permeation through tissues, specificity, increased bioavailability, etc. Various nanoparticles (NPs) including gold nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, aptamer-based NPs etc. were conjugated with biomarkers/diagnostic agents specific to cancer type and were delivered. Various biomarker genes have been identified through precision techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC like EGFR, RET, KRAS, ALK, ROS-1, NTRK-1, etc. By incorporating of drug with the nanoparticle through bioconjugation, the specificity of the treatment can be enhanced with this revolutionary treatment. Additionally, integration of theranostic cargos in the nanoparticle would allow diagnosis as well as treatment by targeting the site of disease progression. Therefore, to target NSCLC effectively precision nanomedicine has been adopted in recent times. Here, we present different nanoparticles that are used as precision nanomedicine and their effectiveness against NSCLC disease.

Efficacy of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Poor Performance Status and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations: Findings from the Japanese Lung Cancer Registry Database

BACKGROUND

In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, those with impaired performance status (PS) treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated comparable activities to good-PS patients. Due to the limited sample size and inclusion of older adult patients with good PS, these findings may not accurately depict the efficacy of EGFR-TKI in poor-PS patients. We investigated the benefit of EGFR-TKIs in this population and identified relevant prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This nationwide prospective registry study included 9872 patients with local or advanced NSCLC. Outcomes were compared between poor- and good-PS patients treated with EGFR-mutated lung cancer therapies.

RESULTS

Of 9872 NSCLC patients, 1965 (19.9%) had EGFR mutations, with 1846 (93.9%) presenting common EGFR mutations. Poor PS (PS score ≥ 3) was noted in 171 patients (8.7%) and identified as an independent prognostic factor; those with poor PS had a significantly lower 1-year survival rate. The median overall survival (OS) for EGFR-TKI-treated good-PS patients was 31.5 (95% confidence interval, 29.6-33.4) months. Among poor-PS patients with EGFR mutations, 135 (78.9%) of whom were treated with EGFR-TKI had an OS of 15.5 (12.7-18.3) months, while those receiving only supportive care had an OS of 2.5 (1.4-3.6) months (P < .001). Hypoalbuminemia (< 3.5 g/dL), liver metastasis, and uncommon EGFR mutations were associated with poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Poor PS at diagnosis was rare and associated with limited EGFR-TKI efficacy and a dismal prognosis. Liver metastasis and hypoalbuminemia may reduce EGFR-TKI efficacy in these patients.

Spheroids Generated from Malignant Pleural Effusion as a Tool to Predict the Response of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer to Treatment

BACKGROUND

Spheroids generated by tumor cells collected from malignant pleural effusion (MPE) were shown to retain the characteristics of the original tumors. This ex vivo model might be used to predict the response of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to anticancer treatments.

METHODS

The characteristics, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status, and clinical response to EGFR-TKIs treatment of enrolled patients were recorded. The viability of the spheroids generated from MPE of enrolled patients were evaluated by visualization of the formazan product of the MTT assay.

RESULTS

Spheroids were generated from 14 patients with NSCLC-related MPE. Patients with EGFR L861Q, L858R, or Exon 19 deletion all received EGFR-TKIs, and five of these seven patients responded to treatment. The viability of the spheroids generated from MPE of these five patients who responded to EGFR-TKIs treatment was significantly reduced after gefitinib treatment. On the other hand, gefitinib treatment did not reduce the viability of the spheroids generated from MPE of patients with EGFR wild type, Exon 20 insertion, or patients with sensitive EGFR mutation but did not respond to EGFR-TKIs treatment.

CONCLUSION

Multicellular spheroids generated from NSCLC-related MPE might be used to predict the response of NSCLC to treatment.

The cost-effectiveness of including liquid biopsy into molecular profiling strategies for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in an Asian population

OBJECTIVES

Liquid biopsy is complementary to tissue biopsy for lung cancer profiling, yet evidence of the cost-effectiveness is limited. This could retard implementation and reimbursement in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of profiling strategies that include liquid biopsy and to identify the optimal profiling approach for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in an Asian population using Singapore as an example.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision tree and partitioned-survival model was developed from the Singapore healthcare system's perspective to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five molecular profiling strategies: either tissue or plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) alone, a concurrent, and two sequential approaches. Model inputs were informed by local data or published literature. Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were undertaken to understand the robustness of the conclusions for decision making. The optimal strategy at different willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds was presented by cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier and the expected loss curve.

RESULTS

The sequential tissue-plasma NGS approach revealed an additional 0.0981 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for an extra cost of S$3,074 over a 20-year time horizon compared to tissue NGS alone, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of S$31,318/QALY and an incremental net monetary benefit of S$1,343 per patient. The findings were sensitive to the costs of pembrolizumab and osimertinib and the probabilities of re-biopsy after tissue NGS. Sequential plasma-tissue NGS and plasma NGS alone were more costly and less effective than alternatives.

CONCLUSION

The sequential tissue-plasma NGS approach generated the highest net monetary benefit and was the optimal testing strategy when WTP was S$45,000/QALY. It retained superiority but understandably with a higher ICER when expensive, non-first line treatments were included. Overall, its routine clinical practice should be proactively considered for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous NSCLC in an Asian population.

Efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKI combined with WBRT vs. WBRT alone in the treatment of brain metastases from NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The efficacy and safety of combining epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for treating brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients remains to be determined.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted using databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), aiming to identify relevant clinical studies on the treatment of brain metastases originating from non-small cell lung cancer through the combination of EGFR-TKI and WBRT. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing Stata 17.0 software, covering clinical studies published until March 1, 2023.

Results

This analysis incorporated 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), involving a total of 2,025 patients. Of these, 1,011 were allocated to the group receiving both EGFR-TKI and WBRT, while 1,014 were assigned to the WBRT alone group. The findings reveal that the combination of EGFR-TKI and WBRT significantly improves the intracranial objective remission rate (RR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.42-1.74, p < 0.001), increases the intracranial disease control rate (RR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.23-1.37, p < 0.001), and enhances the 1-year survival rate (RR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.26-1.73, p < 0.001). Additionally, this combined treatment was associated with a significant survival advantage (RR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.26-1.73, p < 0.001) and a reduced incidence of adverse effects (RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.83, p < 0.001), particularly with respect to nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.37-0.81, p = 0.002) and myelosuppression (RR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.40-0.87, p = 0.008). However, no statistically significant differences were observed for diarrhea (RR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.82-1.62, p = 0.418), and skin rash (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.88-2.07, p = 0.164).

Conclusion

In contrast to WBRT alone, the combination of EGFR-TKI and WBRT significantly improves intracranial response, enhancing the objective response rate, disease control rate, and 1-year survival rate in NSCLC patients with brain metastases. Moreover, aside from mild cases of rash and diarrhea, there is no statistically significant increase in the incidence of additional adverse effects. Based on the comprehensive evidence collected, the use of third-generation EGFR-TKI combined with WBRT is recommended as the preferred treatment for NSCLC patients with brain metastases, offering superior management of metastatic brain lesions.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#, CRD42023415566.

Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2 (TET2) deficiency elicits EGFR-TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) resistance in non-small cell lung cancer

Despite epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have shown remarkable efficacy in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), acquired resistance inevitably develops, limiting clinical efficacy. We found that TET2 was poly-ubiquitinated by E3 ligase CUL7FBXW11 and degraded in EGFR-TKI resistant NSCLC cells. Genetic perturbation of TET2 rendered parental cells more tolerant to TKI treatment. TET2 was stabilized by MEK1 phosphorylation at Ser 1107, while MEK1 inactivation promoted its proteasome degradation by enhancing the recruitment of CUL7FBXW11. Loss of TET2 resulted in the upregulation of TNF/NF-κB signaling that confers the EGFR-TKI resistance. Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of NF-κB attenuate the TKI resistance both in vitro and in vivo. Our findings exemplified how a cell growth controlling kinase MEK1 leveraged the epigenetic homeostasis by regulating TET2, and demonstrated an alternative path of non-mutational acquired EGFR-TKI resistance modulated by TET2 deficiency. Therefore, combined strategy exploiting EGFR-TKI and inhibitors of TET2/NF-κB axis holds therapeutic potential for treating NSCLC patients who suffered from this resistance.

Stepwise prolongation of overall survival from first to third generation EGFR-TKIs for EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project (TREAD 01)

OBJECTIVE

The introduction of new-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has afforded promising overall survival outcomes in clinical trials for non-small-cell lung cancer. We aim to investigate the current adoption rate of these agents and the real-world impact on overall survival among institutions.

METHODS

In a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 46 Tokushukai Medical Group hospitals in Japan, we analyzed clinical data of consecutive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving EGFR-TKIs between April 2010 and March 2020. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses examined the associations between overall survival and patient/tumor-related factors and first-line EGFR-TKIs.

RESULTS

A total of 758 patients (58.5% females; median age, 73 years) were included. Of 40 patients diagnosed in 2010, 72.5% received gefitinib, whereas 81.3% of 107 patients diagnosed in 2019 received osimertinib as the first-line EGFR-TKI. With a median follow-up of 15.8 months, the median overall survival was 28.4 months (95% confidence interval, 15.3-31.0). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, age, body mass index, disease status, EGFR mutational status and first-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor were identified as significant prognostic factors after adjusting for background factors including study period, hospital volume and hospital type. The estimated 2-year overall survival rates for gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib and osimertinib were 70.1% (95% confidence interval 59.7-82.4), 67.8% (95% confidence interval 55.3-83.2), 75.5% (95% confidence interval 64.7-88.0) and 90.8% (95% confidence interval 84.8-97.3), respectively. The median time to treatment failure of gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib and osimertinib were 12.8, 8.8, 12.0 and 16.9 months or more, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world data revealed that the swift and widespread utilization of newer-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, and that these newer-generation EGFR-TKIs can prolong overall survival regardless of hospital volume or type. Therefore, osimertinib could be a reasonable first choice treatment for these patients across various clinical practice settings.

Cutting-Edge Therapies for Lung Cancer

Lung cancer remains a formidable global health challenge that necessitates inventive strategies to improve its therapeutic outcomes. The conventional treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, have demonstrated limitations in achieving sustained responses. Therefore, exploring novel approaches encompasses a range of interventions that show promise in enhancing the outcomes for patients with advanced or refractory cases of lung cancer. These groundbreaking interventions can potentially overcome cancer resistance and offer personalized solutions. Despite the rapid evolution of emerging lung cancer therapies, persistent challenges such as resistance, toxicity, and patient selection underscore the need for continued development. Consequently, the landscape of lung cancer therapy is transforming with the introduction of precision medicine, immunotherapy, and innovative therapeutic modalities. Additionally, a multifaceted approach involving combination therapies integrating targeted agents, immunotherapies, or traditional cytotoxic treatments addresses the heterogeneity of lung cancer while minimizing its adverse effects. This review provides a brief overview of the latest emerging therapies that are reshaping the landscape of lung cancer treatment. As these novel treatments progress through clinical trials are integrated into standard care, the potential for more effective, targeted, and personalized lung cancer therapies comes into focus, instilling renewed hope for patients facing challenging diagnoses.

Does dose reduction of afatinib affect treatment outcomes of patients with EGFR-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in real-world clinical practice?

Background

Afatinib can be started at a dose lower than the recommended starting dose of 40 mg/day for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however treatment outcomes in real-world clinical practice remains unclear.

Methods

This retrospective study of patients with NSCLC from 18 major hospitals (public, private or university teaching hospitals) enrolled in Malaysia's National Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgical Database (NCTSD) assessed the efficacy of lower doses of afatinib on treatment outcomes in a real-world clinical practice. Data on clinical characteristics, afatinib dosing, and treatment outcomes for patients included in NCTSD from 1st January 2015 to 31st December 2020 were analyzed.

Results

Of the 133 patients studied, 94.7% had adenocarcinoma. Majority of the patients (60.9%) had EGFR exon 19 deletion and 23.3% had EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation. The mean age of patients was 64.1 years and majority (83.5%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2-4 at diagnosis. The most common afatinib starting doses were 40 mg (37.6%), 30 mg (29.3%), and 20 mg (26.3%) once daily (OD), respectively. A quarter of patients had dose reduction (23.3%) due to side effects or cost constraints. Majority of the patients had partial response to afatinib (63.2%) whilst 2.3% had complete response. Interestingly, the objective response rate was significantly higher (72.3%) with afatinib OD doses of less than 40 mg compared to 40 mg (54.0%) (P=0.032). Patients on lower doses of afatinib were two times more likely to achieve an objective response [odds ratio =2.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-5.83; P=0.016]. These patients had a numerically but not statistically longer median time to treatment failure (TTF). Median TTF (95% CI) for the overall cohort was 12.4 (10.02-14.78) months. Median overall survival (95% CI) was 21.30 (15.86-26.75) months.

Conclusions

Lower afatinib doses (<40 mg OD) could be equally effective as standard dose in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC and may be more suited to Asian patients, minimizing side effects that may occur at higher dosages of afatinib leading to dose interruptions and affecting treatment outcomes.

A macrocyclic kinase inhibitor overcomes triple resistant mutations in EGFR-positive lung cancer

Brigatinib-based therapy was effective against osimertinib-resistant EGFR C797S mutants and is undergoing clinical studies. However, tumor relapse suggests additional resistance mutations might emerge. Here, we first demonstrated the binding mode of brigatinib to the EGFR-T790M/C797S mutant by crystal structure analysis and predicted brigatinib-resistant mutations through a cell-based assay including N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis. We found that clinically reported L718 and G796 compound mutations appeared, consistent with their proximity to the binding site of brigatinib, and brigatinib-resistant quadruple mutants such as EGFR-activating mutation/T790M/C797S/L718M were resistant to all the clinically available EGFR-TKIs. BI-4020, a fourth-generation EGFR inhibitor with a macrocyclic structure, overcomes the quadruple and major EGFR-activating mutants but not the minor mutants, such as L747P or S768I. Molecular dynamics simulation revealed the binding mode and affinity between BI-4020 and EGFR mutants. This study identified potential therapeutic strategies using the new-generation macrocyclic EGFR inhibitor to overcome the emerging ultimate resistance mutants.

Oncogenic alterations in advanced NSCLC: a molecular super-highway

Lung cancer ranks among the most common cancers world-wide and is the first cancer-related cause of death. The classification of lung cancer has evolved tremendously over the past two decades. Today, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly lung adenocarcinoma, comprises a multitude of molecular oncogenic subsets that change both the prognosis and management of disease.Since the first targeted oncogenic alteration identified in 2004, with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), there has been unprecedented progress in identifying and targeting new molecular alterations. Almost two decades of experience have allowed scientists to elucidate the biological function of oncogenic drivers and understand and often overcome the molecular basis of acquired resistance mechanisms. Today, targetable molecular alterations are identified in approximately 60% of lung adenocarcinoma patients in Western populations and 80% among Asian populations. Oncogenic drivers are largely enriched among non-smokers, east Asians, and younger patients, though each alteration has its own patient phenotype.The current landscape of druggable molecular targets includes EGFR, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1), Kirstin rat sarcoma virus (KRAS), human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2), c-MET proto-oncogene (MET), neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK), rearranged during transfection (RET), neuregulin 1 (NRG1). In addition to these known targets, others including Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) have garnered significant attention and are the subject of numerous ongoing trials.In this era of personalized, precision medicine, it is of paramount importance to identify known or potential oncogenic drivers in each patient. The development of targeted therapy is mirrored by diagnostic progress. Next generation sequencing offers high-throughput, speed and breadth to identify molecular alterations in entire genomes or targeted regions of DNA or RNA. It is the basis for the identification of the majority of current druggable alterations and offers a unique window into novel alterations, and de novo and acquired resistance mechanisms.In this review, we discuss the diagnostic approach in advanced NSCLC, focusing on current oncogenic driver alterations, through their pathophysiology, management, and future perspectives. We also explore the shortcomings and hurdles encountered in this rapidly evolving field.

Differential efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors according to the types of EGFR mutations and agents in non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Both first and second-generation EGFR-TKIs are recommended in advanced NSCLC with common EGFR mutations. However, there are few data on the difference in efficacy of EGFR-TKIs based on the type of EGFR mutation and agents.

METHODS

This retrospective real-world study evaluated the outcomes and clinicopathologic characteristics, including the type of EGFR mutations, of 237 advanced NSCLC patients treated with first- or second-generation (afatinib) EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all patients were 11 months (M) and 25M, respectively. In the univariate analysis, patients with exon 19 deletion (del) (n=130) had significantly longer median OS compared to those with other mutations (L858R: 84, others: 23) (30 vs. 22 M, p=0.047), without a difference in PFS (p=0.138). Patients treated with afatinib (n=60) showed significantly longer median OS compared to those treated with first-generation TKIs (gefitinib: 159, erlotinib: 18) (30 vs. 23 M, p=0.037), without a difference in PFS (p=0.179). In patients with exon 19 del, there was no significant difference in median PFS (p=0.868) or OS (p=0.361) between patients treated with afatinib and those treated with first-generation TKIs, while significantly better PFS (p=0.042) and trend in OS (p=0.069) were observed in patients receiving afatinib in other mutations. Exon 19 del was independently associated with favorable OS (p=0.028), while age >70 years (p=0.017), ECOG performance status ≥2 (p=0.001), primary metastatic disease (p=0.007), and synchronous brain metastasis (p=0.026) were independent prognostic factors of poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The EGFR exon 19 del was associated with favorable OS in advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line EGFR-TKIs. Moreover, in patients with exon 19 del, first-generation TKIs seem to be a reasonable treatment option if osimertinib is unavailable.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of structurally new 4-indolyl quinazoline derivatives as highly potent, selective and orally bioavailable EGFR inhibitors

Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been recognized as an effective strategy for treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although several representative EGFR inhibitors have been approved for clinical use, it is highly desirable to develop highly potent and selective EGFR inhibitors with novel scaffolds because of the occurrence of acquired resistance after treatment. Here we first demonstrate that the 4-indolyl quinazoline derivatives could potently inhibit EGFR in vitro and in vivo, of which YS-67 effectively and selectively inhibits EGFR[WT] (IC50 = 5.2 nM), EGFR[d746-750] (IC50 = 9.6 nM) and EGFR[L858R] (IC50 = 1.9 nM). The TREEspot™ kinase interaction map further reveals the binding selectivity toward 468 kinases. YS-67 not only potently suppresses p-EGFR and p-AKT, but also effectively inhibits proliferation of A549 (IC50 = 4.1 μM), PC-9 (IC50 = 0.5 μM) and A431 cells (IC50 = 2.1 μM). YS-67 treatment also causes colony formation inhibition, arrests cell cycle progression at G0/G1 phases and induces apoptosis. More importantly, YS-67 is well tolerated in A431 xenograft model after oral administration, showing effective tumor growth suppression and low toxicity. Collectively, YS-67 represents an underexplored scaffold for developing new EGFR inhibitors.

Genetic Profiling of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Moroccan Patients by Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing

OBJECTIVES

We retrospectively analyzed the next-generation sequencing (NGS) results from diagnosed NSCLC patients to identify and compare genomic alterations of NSCLC between Moroccan patients and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We also aimed to investigate the distribution and frequency of concurrent genomic alterations.

METHODS

From December 2022 to December 2023, a retrospective study of 76 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples have been profiled using the Oncomine™ Precision Assay on the Ion Torrent™ Genexus™ Integrated Sequencer across the panel of 50 key genes that are applicable for the selection of targeted therapy.

RESULTS

Seventy of the 76 FFPE sequenced samples carried at least one genetic alteration in the tested genes. The study identified 234 genetic alterations in 18 genes. Targetable genetic alterations in EGFR, KRAS, MET, BRAF, ALK, RET and ROS1 were identified in 84.3% of tumors. EGFR and KRAS mutations were frequently reported, occurring in 24.3% and 22.9% of cases, respectively. The untargetable genetic alterations were found in 74.3% of the specimens in FGFR3, TP53, ERBB2, PIK3CA, CDKN2A, PDL1, FGFR1, PTEN, CHEK2 and ERBB3. There were additional uncommon/rare mutations in EGFR, BRAF, RET and ROS1. Comparing the prevalence of selected mutated genes in the NSCLC patients from the TCGA database identified substantial differences in EGFR (24.3%, vs14.97%), KRAS (22.9%, vs 25.99%), and TP53 (34.3%, vs 50.94%). ALK, ROS1, and RET gene rearrangements were detected in 4.3% of the 70 tumors tested. The ALK/RET/MET/ROS1/EML4 fusions were detected in 11.4% of samples. Co-alterations occurred in 67.1% of specimens. Co-occurring driver gene mutations were observed in 44.3%. TP53 mutations co-occurred driver gene mutations in 30% of tumors. Three cases (4.3%) harbored concurrent FGFR3, TP53, and PIK3CA alterations.

CONCLUSION

Our results regarding the proportion of samples with actionable mutations demonstrate the value of NGS testing for NSCLC patients in a real-world clinical diagnostic setting.

Correlation Analysis between T790M Status and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with EGFR-sensitive Mutation Advanced NSCLC who Progressed after the First Generation and First-line EGFR-TKIs Administration: A Real-world Exploratory Study

AIM

The present study is to investigate the association between T790M status and clinical characteristics of patients with EGFR-sensitive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progressed the initial epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFRTKIs) administration.

METHODS

A total of 167 patients with EGFR-sensitive mutations advanced NSCLC who had successful genetic tests and progressed the initial EGFR-TKI treatment were included in this study retrospectively. The clinical and demographic characteristics of these patients were collected, which were manifested as pathological type, metastasis location, initial biopsy method, initial genetic test specimens, and baseline gene mutations status. Correlation analysis between T790M status and these characteristics was performed and prognostic analysis regarding the different subgroups was carried out accordingly.

RESULTS

The prevalence of secondary T790M after resistance to initial EGFR-TKIs among the 167 patients was 52.7%. Correlation analysis indicated that the median progression-free Survival (PFS) to initial EGFR-TKIs >12 months were more likely to develop secondary T790M in univariate analysis. However, the conclusion failed to show statistically significant in multivariate analysis. Additionally, patients with intracranial progression of initial EGFR-TKIs therapy were associated with secondary EGFR-T790M. However, it should be noted that those whose best overall response was partial response (PR) during the EGFR-TKI therapy were relevant to secondary T790M. Furthermore, The median PFS of the initial EGFR-TKIs administration was longer among patients with T790M positive mutation and patients with PR reaction than those without T790M mutation and patients with stable disease (SD), respectively (median PFS: 13.6 vs. 10.9 months, P=0.023) and (median PFS: 14.0 vs. 10.1 months, P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study highlighted the real-world evidence that the best efficacy and intracranial progression with initial EGFR-TKIs therapy among patients with advanced NSCLC might be the promising indicators to predict the occurrence of EGFR-T790M. Patients with PR reaction and T790M positive mutation conferred longer PFS of the initial EGFR-TKIs administration. Also, the conclusion should be confirmed in more patients with advanced NSCLC subsequently.

Platinum-based targeted chemotherapies and reversal of cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Lung cancer is the one of the most prevalent cancer in the world. It kills more people from cancer than any other cause and is especially common in underdeveloped nations. With 1.2 million instances, it is also the most prevalent cancer in men worldwide, making about 16.7% of the total cancer burden. Surgery is the main form of curative treatment for early-stage lung cancer. However, the majority of patients had incurable advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) recurrence after curative purpose surgery, which is indicative of the aggressiveness of the illness and the dismal outlook. The gold standard of treatment for NSCLC patients includes drug targeting of specific mutated genes drive in development of lung cancer. Furthermore, patients with advanced NSCLC and those with early-stage illness needing adjuvant therapy should use cisplatin as it is the more active platinum drug. So, this review encompasses the non-small cell lung cancer microenvironment, treatment approaches, and use of cisplatin as a first-line regimen for NSCLC, its mechanism of action, cisplatin resistance in NSCLC and also the prevention strategies to revert the drug resistance.

Safety of Readministration of EGFR-TKI After Onset of Interstitial Lung Disease in Advanced EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) interruption due to EGFR-TKI-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a factor for shorter overall survival (OS). Several retrospective cohort studies have reported an OS-prolonging effect of the readministration of EGFR-TKIs. This study aimed to determine the safety of readministration of EGFR-TKIs after the onset of EGFR-TKI-induced ILD.

METHODS

The PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched until May 30, 2023. The primary outcome was successful readministration of EGFR-TKIs after the onset of EGFR-TKI-induced ILD.

RESULTS

A total of 690 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The initial EGFR-TKI-induced ILD rate was 13.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]:6.4-20.9). Readministration rate of EGFR-TKI after onset of EGFR-TKI-induced ILD was 40.2% (95% CI: 26.7-53.7). The successful readministration rate of EGFR-TKIs after onset of EGFR-TKI-induced ILD was 81.9% (95% CI: 73.8-90.0). Successful rate of EGFR-TKI readministration in patients with Grade 2 or higher adverse events post initial EGFR-TKI therapy was 76.1% (95% CI: 55.6-96.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Although initial EGFR-TKI-induced ILD has a relatively high incidence, EGFR-TKI readministration after the onset of EGFR-TKI-induced ILD may be a viable treatment option.

Randomized phase II study of preoperative afatinib in untreated head and neck cancers: predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers of activity

There is no strong and reliable predictive biomarker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) for EGFR inhibitors. We aimed to identify predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers of efficacy of afatinib, a pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in a window-of-opportunity trial (NCT01415674). Multi-omics analyses were carried out on pre-treatment biopsy and surgical specimen for biological assessment of afatinib activity. Sixty-one treatment-naïve and operable HNSCC patients were randomised to afatinib 40 mg/day for 21-28 days versus no treatment. Afatinib produced a high rate of metabolic response. Responders had a higher expression of pERK1/2 (P = 0.02) and lower expressions of pHER4 (P = 0.03) and pRB1 (P = 0.002) in pre-treatment biopsy compared to non-responders. At the cellular level, responders displayed an enrichment of tumor-infiltrating B cells under afatinib (P = 0.02). At the molecular level, NF-kappa B signaling was over-represented among upregulated genes in non-responders (P < 0.001; FDR = 0.01). Although exploratory, phosphoproteomics-based biomarkers deserve further investigations as predictors of afatinib efficacy.

Brain metastasis, EGFR mutation subtype and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly influence the treatment outcome of patient with EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is brain metastasis (BM)-prone. We determined the impact of this hallmark, along with EGFR subtype and generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, on patients' outcome. 553 metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients received front-line EGFR-TKI treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M rate were analysed. BM was observed in 211 (38.2%) patients. BM (HR 1.20 [95% CI 0.99-1.48]; p = 0.053), ECOG PS 0-1 (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.54-0.93]; p = 0.014) and afatinib treatment (HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.66-0.99]; p = 0.045) were associated with PFS. Afatinib-treated patients without BM demonstrated a significantly longer PFS (16.3 months) compared to afatinib-treated patients with BM (13.7 months) and to gefitinib/erlotinib-treated patients with (11.1 months) or without BM (14.2 months; p < 0.001). CNS-only progression trended higher in afatinib-treated patients. ECOG PS 0-1 (HR 0.41 [95% CI 0.31-0.56]; p < 0.001) and EGFR L858R mutation (HR 1.46 [95% CI 1.13-1.88]; p = 0.003), but not BM, were the predictors for OS. BM (OR 2.02 [95% CI 1.02-4.08]; p = 0.040), afatinib treatment (OR 0.26 [95% CI 0.12-0.50]; p < 0.001) and EGFR L858R mutation (OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.28-1.05]; p = 0.070) were associated with secondary T790M rate. In BM patients, gefitinib/erlotinib-treated ones with 19 deletion mutation and afatinib-treated ones with L858R mutation had the highest and the lowest T790M rate (94.4% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.001), respectively. BM and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly impact PFS and secondary T790M rate in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, whereas OS was mainly associated with EGFR subtype.

Survival outcomes of east Asian patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A network meta-analysis of real-world evidence

BACKGROUND

The comparative efficacies of different generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain largely unknown. Moreover, whether one EGFR-TKI confers superior survival remains unclear, especially in East Asians. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the survival outcomes of East Asian patients with advanced NSCLC treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS

The NMA included observational real-world evidence studies on adult patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC who received first (gefitinib and erlotinib), second (afatinib), or third (osimertinib) generation EGFR-TKIs as frontline therapy. Studies were identified through an online bibliographic search of Medline articles in the PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases.

RESULTS

For overall survival (OS), afatinib had significantly better hazard ratios (HRs) than osimertinib (HR: 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.91), gefitinib (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.43-0.72), and erlotinib (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.92). For progression-free survival (PFS), afatinib had significantly better HRs than gefitinib (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.36-0.56) and erlotinib (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49-0.81). Moreover, afatinib was most likely to achieve the longest OS (81.3%), followed by erlotinib (13%), osimertinib, and gefitinib. Furthermore, afatinib was most likely to achieve the longest PFS (48.3%), followed by osimertinib (34.9%) and erlotinib.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world evidence shows that afatinib confers better survival than other first-line EGFR-TKIs in East Asian patients with advanced NSCLC.

New Generations of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Treating NSCLC with Oncogene Addiction: Strengths and Limitations

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) revolutionized the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring most driver gene alterations. Starting from the first generation, research rapidly moved to the development of newer, more selective generations of TKIs, obtaining improved results in terms of disease control and survival. However, the use of novel generations of TKIs is not without limitations. We reviewed the main results obtained, as well as the ongoing clinical trials with TKIs in oncogene-addicted NSCLC, together with the biology underlying their potential strengths and limitations. Across driver gene alterations, novel generations of TKIs allowed delayed resistance, prolonged survival, and improved brain penetration compared to previous generations, although with different toxicity profiles, that generally moved their use from further lines to the front-line treatment. However, the anticipated positioning of novel generation TKIs leads to abolishing the possibility of TKI treatment sequencing and any role of previous generations. In addition, under the selective pressure of such more potent drugs, resistant clones emerge harboring more complex and hard-to-target resistance mechanisms. Deeper knowledge of tumor biology and drug properties will help identify new strategies, including combinatorial treatments, to continue improving results in patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC.

Statistical considerations in long-term efficacy evaluation of anti-cancer therapies

Anti-cancer therapy has been a significant focus of research. Developing and marketing various types and mechanisms of anti-cancer therapies benefit a variety of patients significantly. The long-term benefit to patients in evaluating the risk-benefit ratio of anti-cancer therapy has become a significant concern. This paper discusses the evaluation of long-term efficacy within the estimand framework and summarizes the various strategies for addressing potential intercurrent events. Non-proportional hazards of survival data may arise with novel anti-cancer therapies, leading to potential bias in conventional evaluation methods. This paper reviews statistical methods for addressing this issue, including novel endpoints, hypothesis testing, and efficacy estimation methods. We also discuss the influences of treatment switching. Although advanced methods have been developed to address the non-proportional hazard, they still have limitations that require continued collaborative efforts to resolve issues.

A randomized phase II study of afatinib alone or combined with bevacizumab for treating chemo-naïve patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations

BACKGROUND

Adding bevacizumab to first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS), but limited data are available for second-generation EGFR-TKIs. AfaBev-CS is a randomized, phase II trial comparing afatinib plus bevacizumab and afatinib alone as first-line treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Untreated patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations (Del19 or L858R) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either afatinib (30 mg) plus bevacizumab (AfaBev group) or afatinib (40 mg) monotherapy (Afa group). The primary endpoint was PFS. The power was >50% under the assumptions of a median PFS of 12 months for the Afa group and hazard ratio (HR) of 0.6 for the AfaBev group.

RESULTS

Between August 2017 and September 2019, 100 patients were enrolled. There was no significant difference in PFS between the groups. The median PFS was 16.3 and 16.1 months for the AfaBev and Afa groups, respectively, with an HR of 0.865 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.539 to 1.388; p = 0.55). In terms of overall survival, there was no significant difference between the groups (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.83; p = 0.67). The overall response rate was 82.6% and 76.6% in the AfaBev and Afa groups, respectively (p = 0.61). Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea, hypertension, acneiform rash, paronychia, and stomatitis were frequently observed in the AfaBev group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study failed to show efficacy of AfaBev over Afa for improving PFS in untreated patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.