Transarterial chemoembolization combined with camrelizumab for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with camrelizumab (hereafter, TACE-camrelizumab) in the treatment of patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (R-HCC) after curative resection.

Patients and methods

R-HCC patients who underwent TACE plus camrelizumab or TACE-alone from January 2016 to August 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were assessed for tumor response, progression-free survival, survival rates and adverse events.

Results

Seventy-one patients were included in this study, including 20 patients in the TACE- camrelizumab group and 51 patients in the TACE-alone group. The objective response rate was 56.9% in the TACE-alone group and 40% in the TACE-camrelizumab group at 3 months (P = 0.201). The disease control rates were 84.3% in TACE-alone group and 80% in TACE-camrelizumab group at 3 months (P = 0.663). The progression-free survival (PFS) of the TACE-alone group was slightly longer than those of the TACE- camrelizumab group (9 months vs. 6 months). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the median PFS (P = 0.586). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the half-year and one-year survival rates (P = 0.304, P = 0.430). Multivariate analysis revealed that Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was associated with PFS significantly. 75% patients developed at least one type of AEs related to camrelizumab in TACE-camrelizumab group, and no patients developed severe AEs.

Conclusion

Comparing with TACE-Alone, the efficacy of TACE-camrelizumab for patients with R-HCC was similar. Meanwhile, the results of this study also indicated that TACE is still a better choice for patients with R-HCC.

The Mutation and Expression Level of LRP1B are Associated with Immune Infiltration and Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

This study aimed to explore the expression level and mutation of LRP1B in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to analyse the relationship between its prognostic value and immune invasion.

Methods

HCC mutant gene sets were obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas and International Cancer Genome Consortium databases. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to evaluate the prognostic value of LRP1B expression and mutation load in HCC. The relationships between LRP1B expression level and immune cells and immune marker molecules were analysed by using the TIMER database. The association of LRP1B expression with drug sensitivity was obtained by using CellMiner. Gene set enrichment analysis and co-expression by Spearman correlation analysis were used to explore the internal mechanism of LRP1B in HCC.

Results

Seventeen most commonly mutated genes were screened out, and LRP1B was the only gene associated with HCC prognosis. The copy number variations were significantly correlated with T cell CD8⁺ (P < 0.05). LRP1B expression level was positively correlated with the infiltration degree of macrophage (P < 0.05, R = 0.132), myeloid dendritic cell (P < 0.05, R = 0.093), neutrophil (P < 0.05, R = 0.134) and T cell CD8+ cells (P < 0.05, R = 0.102) and negatively correlated with B cell (P < 0.05, R = −0.014) and T cell CD4+ (P < 0.05, R = −0.075). LRP1B expression level was significantly correlated with immunomarker molecules and drug sensitivity (all P < 0.05). The prediction of lncRNA RUSC1-AS1/hsa-miR-215-5p/LRP1B axis by bioinformatics may be the potential mechanism underlying LRP1B’s effect on HCC prognosis and progression.

Conclusion

LRP1B plays a vital role in HCC prognostic value, which is expected to be a new potential therapeutic target for HCC. LRP1B provides a theoretical basis for the clinical targeted therapy of HCC.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have historically had few options and faced extremely poor prognoses if their disease progressed after standard-of-care tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Recently, the standard of care for HCC has been transformed as a combination of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) atezolizumab plus the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab was shown to offer improved overall survival in the first-line setting. Immunotherapy has demonstrated safety and efficacy in later lines of therapy as well, and ongoing trials are investigating novel combinations of ICIs and TKIs, in addition to interventions earlier in the course of disease or in combination with liver-directed therapies. Because HCC usually develops against a background of cirrhosis, immunotherapy for liver tumors is complex and oncologists need to account for both immunological and hepatological considerations when developing a treatment plan for their patients. To provide guidance to the oncology community on important concerns for the immunotherapeutic care of HCC, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG). The expert panel drew on the published literature as well as their clinical experience to develop recommendations for healthcare professionals on these important aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment for HCC, including diagnosis and staging, treatment planning, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and patient quality of life (QOL) considerations. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations in this CPG are intended to give guidance to cancer care providers treating patients with HCC.

Research Progresses of Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide, with nearly one million new cases and deaths every year. Owing to the complex pathogenesis, hidden early symptoms, rapidly developing processes, and poor prognosis, the morbidity and mortality of HCC are increasing yearly. With the progress being made in modern medicine, the treatment of HCC is no longer limited to traditional methods. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy have emerged to treat advanced and metastatic HCC in recent years. Since Sorafenib is the first molecular targeting drug against angiogenesis, targeted drugs for HCC are continually emerging. Moreover, immunotherapy plays a vital role in clinical trials. In particular, the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which have received increasing attention in the field of cancer treatment, is a possible research path. Interestingly, these two therapies generally complement each other at some stages of HCC, bringing new hope for patients with advanced HCC. In this paper, we discuss the research progress of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for HCC in recent years, which will provide a reference for the further development of drugs for HCC.

Combination treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombus: A case report

We present a case of a 43-year-old man with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus. Initially, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was performed. Although alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels decreased, circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) levels showed an upward trend, and abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed that tumours in the portal vein had increased. Based on ctDNA profiling, apatinib and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies and were sequentially administered. Approximately three months later, intrahepatic tumours had significantly diminished and AFP and ctDNA levels had reduced. The response was sustained at the 23-month follow-up and the patient was in good health. Combination treatment of TACE, apatinib and anti-PD-1 antibodies was effective, and profiling of ctDNA fragmentation may be beneficial in the therapeutic management of patients with HCC.

Combined immunotherapy and targeted treatment for primary alveolar soft part sarcoma of the lung: case report and literature review

Primary acinar soft part sarcoma of the lung (ASPS) is a rare malignancy with unique cellular structure and clinical and genetic characteristics. Most patients do not exhibit clear clinical symptoms, with only a few developing respiratory symptoms. The typical histological characteristics are acinoid or organ-like structures. Immunofluorescence in situ hybridization suggests a rearrangement of the transcription factor E3 gene. Patients respond poorly to chemotherapy and are, thus, primarily treated with surgery and targeted therapy. We report herein a unique case of primary alveolar soft part sarcoma of the lung. The patient was a 24-year-old man with metastases to multiple organs, such as the brain, lungs, pancreas, and liver. The craniocerebral lesions attained partial remission after whole-brain radiotherapy and targeted combined immunotherapy, and other distant metastases completely disappeared after targeted combined immunotherapy (anlotinib and camrelizumab), indicating significant treatment efficacy. Anlotinib is an oral multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that exerts its anti-tumor effects by acting on various kinases. Camrelizumab is a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody that can target PD-1 to block the interaction between PD-L1 and programmed death ligand 2, ultimately causing an anti-tumor effect. This is the first report of successful use of anlotinib combined with camrelizumab in the treatment of advanced primary ASPS. The treatment benefit provides preliminary evidence that targeted therapy, combined with immunotherapy, may be a safe and effective approach to treat primary pulmonary ASPS patients, thus warranting further investigation.

Camrelizumab in combination with apatinib in second-line or above therapy for advanced primary liver cancer: cohort A report in a multicenter phase Ib/II trial

Background

Emerging clinical data suggest that an immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with an antiangiogenic agent is a reasonable strategy for multiple malignancies. We assessed the combination of camrelizumab with apatinib in pretreated advanced primary liver cancer (PLC, cohort A) from a multicohort phase Ib/II trial.

Methods

Patients with PLC after prior systemic treatment(s) were administered camrelizumab (3 mg/kg, once every 2 weeks) plus apatinib (125, 250, 375, or 500 mg; once per day) in a 3+3 dose-escalation stage and subsequent expansion stage. The primary endpoints were tolerability and safety of study treatment.

Results

From April 2017 to July 2019, 28 patients (21 with hepatocellular carcinoma and 7 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) received camrelizumab plus apatinib. Two dose-limiting toxicities (both grade 3 diarrhea) were reported in the 500 mg cohort. Therefore, the 375 mg cohort was expanded. Of the 19 patients in the 375 mg cohort, dose reduction to 250 mg occurred in 8 patients within 2 months after treatment initiation. Of the 28 patients with PLC, 26 had grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events, with hypertension being the most common (9/28). One treatment-related death occurred. The objective response rate was 10.7% (95% CI 2.3% to 28.2%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.7 months (95% CI 2.0 to 5.8) and 13.2 months (95% CI 8.9 to not reached), respectively.

Conclusion

The combination of camrelizumab with apatinib had a manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced PLC. Apatinib at a dose of 250 mg is recommended as a combination therapy for further studies of advanced PLC treatment.

Trial registration numbers

NCT03092895.

Effects of camrelizumab combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization arterial chemoembolization on serum Egfl7, VEGF, and OPN levels and recurrence rate in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion after radical operation: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

At present, radical resection is still the most effective method for the treatment of patients with liver cancer. Postoperative hepatic transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) can further remove residual tumor tissue and effectively improve the prognosis of patients. In recent years, targeted therapy of liver cancer has attracted much attention. Programmed-death molecule 1 (PD-1) inhibitors can block the binding of PD-1 to its ligand, thus reactivating T lymphocytes and producing sustained anti-tumor effects to inhibit tumor growth. As a new type of PD-1 inhibitor, carrilizumab has been gradually applied in the clinic.

AIM

To investigate the effect of camrelizumab combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) on serum epidermal growth factor-like domain 7 (Egfl7), vascular epithelial growth factor (VEGF), and osteopontin (OPN) levels and recurrence rate of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion after radical operation.

METHODS

A total of 62 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion who were admitted to our hospital from June 2019 to January 2020 were selected. They were divided into either a study group (n = 31) or a control group (n = 31) by simple randomization method. Both groups underwent conventional radical resection of liver cancer. Within 2 mo after surgery, the control group received TACE after surgery, and the study group received camrelizumab + TACE after surgery. Serum levels of tumor markers [carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)], immune function indicators (CD3⁺, CD4⁺, and CD4⁺/CD8⁺), serum levels of Egfl7, VEGF, and OPN, pain degree (VAS), and quality of life (QOL-LC) before treatment and 1 mo and 3 mo after treatment were compared between the two groups. The incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups and the recurrence rate at 3 mo and 6 mo after the end of treatment were also calculated.

RESULTS

At 1 mo and 3 mo after treatment, serum levels of CA199, AFP, and CEA in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05); CD3⁺, CD4⁺, and CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05); serum Egfl7, VEGF, and OPN levels in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05); and the VAS score of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the QOL-LC score was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of reactive capillary hyperplasia (61.29%) in the study group was higher than that in the control group (0.00%) (P < 0.05). Compared with the values of the control group (13.33% and 23.33%), the recurrence rates (6.45% and 9.68%) of the study group at 3 mo and 6 mo after radical operation were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Camrelizumab combined with TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion after radical resection can further lower serum tumor marker levels and improve cellular immune function, effectively regulate serum Egfl7, VEGF, and OPN levels, reduce the degree of pain, and improve the quality of life. Although the addition of carrelizumab significantly increases the incidence of adverse reactions, they are minor and well tolerated by the patients.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status and Novel Perspectives

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a promising treatment for many kinds of cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The rationale for using ICIs in HCC is based on the immunogenic background of hepatitis and cirrhosis and on the observation of high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in this cancer. Promising data from phase I/II studies in advanced HCC, showing durable objective response rates (~20% in first- and second-line settings) and good safety profile, have led to phase III studies with ICIs as single agents or in combination therapy, both in first and second line setting. While the activity of immunotherapy agents as single agents seems to be limited to an "ill-defined" small subset of patients, the combination of the anti PD-L1 atezolizumab and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor bevacizumab revealed a benefit in the outcomes when compared to sorafenib in the first line. In addition, the activity and efficacy of the combinations between anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibody and other ICIs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or surgical and locoregional therapies, has also been investigated in clinical trials. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of ICIs in the management of HCC with a critical evaluation of the current status and future directions.

Ultra-stable Biomembrane Force Probe for Accurately Determining Slow Dissociation Kinetics of PD-1 Blockade Antibodies on Single Living Cells

Immune checkpoint blockade with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) has remarkably revolutionized cancer therapy. Their binding kinetics measured by surface plasmon resonance does not always correlate well with their immunotherapeutic efficacies, mainly due to the lack of two-dimensional cell plasma membrane and the capability of force sensing and manipulation. In this regard, based on a more suitable and ultra-sensitive biomechanical nanotool, biomembrane force probe (BFP), we developed a Double-edge Smart Feedback control system as an ultra-stable platform to characterize ultra-long bond lifetimes of receptor-ligand binding on living cells. We further benchmarked the dissociation kinetics for three clinically approved PD-1 blockade mAbs (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, and Camrelizumab), intriguingly correlating well with the objective response rates in the hepatocellular carcinoma second-line treatment. This ultra-stable BFP potentially provides a compelling kinetic platform to direct the screening, optimization, and clinical selection of therapeutic antibodies in the future.

Immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: Combination strategies

Liver cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer death globally, and its incidence in the United States is increasing. Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not candidates for surgical resection, liver transplant, or locoregional therapies can be treated with systemic therapies. Multiple agents, including sorafenib, lenvatinib, and regorafenib are approved for use as either first- or second-line therapy in this patient population, but all have relatively modest survival benefits. HCC is potentially susceptible to therapy with checkpoint inhibitors, including agents such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab, which are both approved by the Food and Drug Administration for patients previously treated with sorafenib but have not demonstrated superior overall survival in phase III trials. It is clear that more effective approaches are needed to potentiate the effects of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with HCC. This review will outline and appraise the current literature on the use of checkpoint inhibitors in HCC as part of a combination treatment involving an additional mode of therapy. The list of agents that can be paired with checkpoint inhibitors includes an additional checkpoint inhibitor, vascular endothelial growth factor or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, OX-40 agonists, and PT-112 inhibitors. The main non-pharmacologic therapies currently being studied for inclusion in a combination strategy include radiation therapy, trans-arterial chemoembolization, and ablation.

Immune-based therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most frequent cause of cancer-related death. The immune-rich contexture of the HCC microenvironment makes this tumour an appealing target for immune-based therapies. Here, we discuss how the functional characteristics of the liver microenvironment can potentially be harnessed for the treatment of HCC. We will review the evidence supporting a therapeutic role for vaccines, cell-based therapies and immune-checkpoint inhibitors and discuss the potential for patient stratification in an attempt to overcome the series of failures that has characterised drug development in this disease area.

The Changing Landscape of Systemic Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: New Targeted Agents and Immunotherapies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and deadliest cancers worldwide with a rising incidence in the Western world. HCCs are characterized by high resistance to systemic therapies induced by phenotypic and molecular heterogeneity. For almost 10 years, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib was the only approved treatment for advanced HCCs in patients with preserved liver function, and until 2016, no new compounds tested in large phase III studies have led to a survival benefit. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor regorafenib, a fluorinated sorafenib analog, was the first substance that showed a significant improvement in overall survival after failure of sorafenib treatment, which subsequently led to its regulatory approval in a second-line setting in 2017. In addition, the non-inferiority of lenvatinib in comparison with sorafenib opened another therapeutic first-line option in the same year. Furthermore, several other compounds showed promising results in recent phase III studies, including ramucirumab in patients with elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels as well as cabozantinib in second- and third-line settings. In addition, promising early reports of the immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab, with objective response rates of 15-20%, paved the way for immuno-oncological interventions for HCC and these will probably gain increasing attention as mono- and combination therapies. In summary, following the approval of sorafenib in 2007 and almost 10 years of therapeutic stagnation, results from recent clinical trials in first- and further-line settings for the first time demonstrated efficacy of several active compounds in advanced HCCs. Thus, a sequential approach should now be implemented in HCC treatment and will improve the survival of HCC patients.

Overview of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma, and The ITA.LI.CA Cohort Derived Estimate of Amenability Rate to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Clinical Practice

Despite progress in our understanding of the biology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), this tumour remains difficult-to-cure for several reasons, starting from the particular disease environment where it arises—advanced chronic liver disease—to its heterogeneous clinical and biological behaviour. The advent, and good results, of immunotherapy for cancer called for the evaluation of its potential application also in HCC, where there is evidence of intra-hepatic immune response activation. Several studies advanced our knowledge of immune checkpoints expression in HCC, thus suggesting that immune checkpoint blockade may have a strong rationale even in the treatment of HCC. According to this background, initial studies with tremelimumab, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor, and nivolumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody, showed promising results, and further studies exploring the effects of other immune checkpoint inhibitors, alone or with other drugs, are currently underway. However, we are still far from the identification of the correct setting, and sequence, where these drugs might be used in clinical practice, and their actual applicability in real-life is unknown. This review focuses on HCC immunobiology and on the potential of immune checkpoint blockade therapy for this tumour, with a critical evaluation of the available trials on immune checkpoint blocking antibodies treatment for HCC. Moreover, it assesses the potential applicability of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the real-life setting, by analysing a large, multicentre cohort of Italian patients with HCC.

Camrelizumab: First Global Approval

Camrelizumab (AiRuiKa™), a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor being developed by Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co. Ltd, recently received conditional approval in China for the treatment of relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma. The drug is also being investigated as a treatment for various other malignancies, including B cell lymphoma, oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, nasopharyngeal cancer and non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of camrelizumab leading to this first approval for classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

A Single-Arm, Multicenter, Phase II Study of Camrelizumab in Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

PURPOSE

For classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), programmed death-l (PD-1) is a well-recognized attractive target. This multicenter, single-arm, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab, a humanized high-affinity IgG4 mAb against PD-1, in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory cHL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who had failed to achieve a remission or experienced progression after autologous stem cell transplantation or had received at least two lines of systemic chemotherapies were given camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate per independent review committee (IRC) assessment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03155425).

RESULTS

Between June 9, 2017 and September 18, 2017, 75 patients were enrolled and treated. At a median follow-up of 12.9 months, 57 of 75 (76.0%; 95% CI, 64.7-85.1) patients achieved an IRC-assessed objective response, including 21 (28.0%) and 36 (48.0%) patients who had complete and partial remission, respectively. Median duration of response was not reached (range, 0.0⁺-12.8⁺ months). Treatment-related adverse events (AE) occurred in all patients. The most common ones included cutaneous reactive capillary endothelial proliferation (97.3%, 73/75) and pyrexia (42.7%, 32/75). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 20 patients (26.7%); the most common AE was decreased white blood cell count (4.0%, 3/75). There were no grade 5 treatment-related AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Camrelizumab demonstrated a high response rate, durable response and controllable safety in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory cHL, becoming a new safe and effective treatment option in this setting.

Immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: recent advances and future perspectives

The introduction of immunotherapies has been a major development in the treatment of many advanced cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We are entering a new era of systemic therapy for advanced HCC associated with an explosion of clinical trial activity. Data from phase I/II studies of checkpoint inhibitors in advanced HCC have been promising, with durable objective response rates of approximately 20% seen (in both first- and second-line settings) and acceptable safety profiles (including immune-mediated hepatitis). Phase III studies evaluating anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) antibodies compared with sorafenib are already underway. The potential synergistic effects of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 when used in combination with agents against other checkpoint molecules, systemic therapies, as well as conventional surgical and locoregional therapies are also being explored in upcoming clinical trials. Aside from this, other strategies to harness the immune system, including chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T cells, natural killer cell therapies, and peptide vaccines directed against HCC antigens have entered phase I/II studies. Current limitations of immunotherapies and areas of future research include the accurate assessment and prediction of tumor response, overcoming the immunosuppressive effects of a hypoxic microenvironment, and the management of immune-related hepatitis in patients who already have limited liver reserve.

[Treatment of the advanced HCC: A second revolution by using immunotherapy]

The treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma has long been hopeless due to an absence of effective molecules and an underlying cirrhosis, compromising tolerance to conventional chemotherapy. A targeted anti-angiogenic therapy, sorafenib, has been the only option for a decade before new oral molecules have been finally validated. Immunotherapy, intended to correct the immunosuppressive context frequently associated with this tumor, has shown very promising results and could profoundly challenge the therapeutic algorithm of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.