Breast Cancer Index and prediction of benefit from extended endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients treated in the Adjuvant Tamoxifen-To Offer More? (aTTom) trial

Breast Cancer Index and Prediction of Extended Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy Benefit in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer from the NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42 Trial

PURPOSE

BCI (H/I) has been shown to predict extended endocrine therapy (EET) benefit. We examined BCI (H/I) for EET benefit prediction in NSABP B-42, which evaluated extended letrozole therapy (ELT) in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer after 5 years of ET.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A stratified Cox model was used to analyze RFI as the primary endpoint, with DR, BCFI, and DFS as secondary endpoints. Because of a nonproportional effect of ELT on DR, time-dependent analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The translational cohort included 2,178 patients (45% BCI (H/I)-High, 55% BCI (H/I)-Low). ELT showed an absolute 10-year RFI benefit of 1.6% (P = 0.10), resulting in an underpowered primary analysis (50% power). ELT benefit and BCI (H/I) did not show a significant interaction for RFI (BCI (H/I)-Low: 10 years absolute benefit 1.1% [HR, 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-1.12; P = 0.13]; BCI (H/I)-High: 2.4% [HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.55-1.26; P = 0.38]; Pinteraction = 0.56). Time-dependent DR analysis showed that after 4 years, BCI (H/I)-High patients had significant ELT benefit (HR = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.12-0.69; P < 0.01), whereas BCI (H/I)-Low patients were less likely to benefit (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.33-1.39; P = 0.29; Pinteraction = 0.14). Prediction of ELT benefit by BCI (H/I) was more apparent in the HER2- subset after 4 years (ELT-by-BCI (H/I) Pinteraction = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

BCI (H/I)-High versus BCI (H/I)-Low did not show a statistically significant difference in ELT benefit for the primary endpoint (RFI). However, in time-dependent DR analysis, BCI (H/I)-High patients experienced statistically significant benefit from ELT after 4 years, whereas (H/I)-Low patients did not. Because BCI (H/I) has been validated as a predictive marker of EET benefit in other trials, additional follow-up may enable further characterization of BCI's predictive ability.

Validation of the Prognostic Performance of Breast Cancer Index in Hormone Receptor-Positive Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients in the TEAM Trial

PURPOSE

Patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer face a prolonged risk of recurrence even after adjuvant endocrine therapy. The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is significantly prognostic for overall (0-10 years) and late (5-10 years) distant recurrence (DR) risk in N0 and N1 patients. Here, BCI prognostic performance was evaluated in HR+ postmenopausal women from the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

3,544 patients were included in the analysis (N = 1,519 N0, N = 2,025 N+). BCI risk groups were calculated using pre-specified cutoff points. Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were used to assess the prognostic significance of BCI risk groups based on DR. Hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox models with and without clinical covariates.

RESULTS

For overall 10-year DR, BCI was significantly prognostic in Ni0 (N = 1,196) and N1 (N = 1,234) patients who did not receive prior chemotherapy (P < 0.001). In patients who were DR-free for 5 years, 10-year late DR rates for low- and high-risk groups were 5.4% and 9.3% (N0 cohort, N = 1,285) and 4.8% and 12.2% (N1 cohort, N = 1,625) with multivariate HRs of 2.25 (95% CI, 1.30-3.88; P = 0.004) and 2.67 (95% CI, 1.53-4.63; P < 0.001), respectively. Late DR performance was substantially improved using previously optimized cutoff points, identifying BCI low-risk groups with even lower 10-year late DR rates of 3.8% and 2.7% in N0 and N1 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The TEAM trial represents the largest prognostic validation study for BCI to date and provides a more representative assessment of late DR risk to guide individualized treatment decision-making for HR+ patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Clinical genetics in breast cancer

As genetic testing becomes increasingly more accessible and more applicable with a broader range of clinical implications, it may also become more challenging for breast cancer providers to remain up-to-date. This review outlines some of the current clinical guidelines and recent literature surrounding germline genetic testing, as well as genomic testing, in the screening, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer, while identifying potential areas of further research.

Developing liver-targeted naringenin nanoparticles for breast cancer endocrine therapy by promoting estrogen metabolism

Endocrine therapy is standard for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer treatment. However, current strategies targeting estrogen signaling pay little attention to estradiol metabolism in the liver and is usually challenged by treatment failure. In a previous study, we demonstrated that the natural compound naringenin (NAR) inhibited HR+ breast cancer growth by activating estrogen sulfotransferase (EST) expression in the liver. Nevertheless, the poor water solubility, low bio-barrier permeability, and non-specific distribution limited its clinical application, particularly for oral administration. Here, a novel nano endocrine drug NAR-cell penetrating peptide-galactose nanoparticles (NCG) is reported. We demonstrated that NCG presented specific liver targeting and increased intestinal barrier permeability in both cell and zebrafish xenotransplantation models. Furthermore, NCG showed liver targeting and enterohepatic circulation in mouse breast cancer xenografts following oral administration. Notably, the cancer inhibition efficacy of NCG was superior to that of both NAR and the positive control tamoxifen, and was accompanied by increased hepatic EST expression and reduced estradiol levels in the liver, blood, and tumor tissue. Moreover, few side effects were observed after NCG treatment. Our findings reveal NCG as a promising candidate for endocrine therapy and highlight hepatic EST targeting as a novel therapeutic strategy for HR+ breast cancer.

Fine-Tuning Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: An Expert Consensus on Open Issues for Future Research

After decades of research, improving the efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for early-stage breast cancer becomes increasingly difficult. Beyond technological breakthroughs and the availability of new classes of drugs, further improvement of adjuvant ET will require applying a rigorous research approach in poorly investigated areas. We critically discuss some key principles that should inform future research to improve ET efficacy, including identifying specific subgroups of patients who can benefit from escalating or de-escalating approaches, optimizing available and new treatment strategies for different clinical contexts, and dissecting the direct and indirect biological effects of therapeutic interventions. Four main issues regarding adjuvant ET were identified as relevant areas, where a better application of such principles can provide positive results in the near future: (i) tailoring the optimal duration of adjuvant ET, (ii) optimizing ovarian function suppression for premenopausal women, (iii) dissecting the biological effects of estrogen receptor manipulation, and (iv) refining the selection of patients to candidate for treatments escalation.

Development of an obesity-related multi-gene prognostic model incorporating clinical characteristics in luminal breast cancer

Despite adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in luminal breast cancer (LBC), relapses are common. Addressing this, we aim to develop a prognostic model to refine adjuvant therapy strategies, particularly for patients at high recurrence risk. Notably, obesity profoundly affects the tumor microenvironment (TME) of LBC. However, it is unclear whether obesity-related biological features can effectively screen high-risk patients. Utilizing weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) on RNA sequencing (RNAseq) data, we identified seven obese LBC genes (OLGs) closely associated with patient prognosis. Subsequently, we developed a luminal obesity-gene clinical prognostic index (LOG-CPI), combining a 7-gene signature, TNM staging, and age. Its predictive efficacy was confirmed across validation datasets and a clinical cohort (5-year accuracy = 0.828, 0.760, 0.751, and 0.792, respectively). LOG-CPI emerges as a promising predictor for clinical prognosis and treatment response, helping distinguish molecular and immunological features in LBC patients and guiding clinical practice by identifying varying prognoses.

Biomarkers predictive of a response to extended endocrine therapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Extension of adjuvant endocrine therapy beyond five years confers only modest survival benefit in breast cancer patients and carries risk of toxicities. This systematic review investigates the role of biomarker tests in predicting the clinical response to an extension of endocrine therapy.

METHODS

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Global Index Medicus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using an iterative approach to identify full-text articles related to breast cancer, endocrine therapy, and biomarkers.

RESULTS

Of the 1,217 unique reports identified, five studies were deemed eligible. Four investigated the Breast Cancer Index (BCI) assay in three distinct study populations. These studies consistently showed that BCI score was predictive of response to extended endocrine therapy among 1,946 combined patients, who were predominately non-Hispanic white and postmenopausal.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence in the setting of predictive tests for extended endocrine therapy is sparse. Most relevant studies investigated the use of BCI, but these study populations were largely restricted to a single age, race, and ethnicity group. Future studies should evaluate a variety of biomarkers in diverse populations. Without sufficient evidence, physicians and patients face a difficult decision in balancing the benefits and risks of endocrine therapy extension.

Interventions to improve oral endocrine therapy adherence in breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Oral endocrine therapy (OET) is recommended in prevention and treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR+ BC). Despite the reduced incidence, recurrence, and mortality, OET adherence is poor in this patient population. The aim of this study was to review the latest literature to identify effective interventions to improve medication adherence in patients taking OET for prevention or treatment of HR+ BC.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) framework was used to perform this review. We utilized PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science to acquire articles using search terms including breast cancer, adherence, persistence, and acceptability. Inclusion criteria included publication in peer-reviewed journal, primary data source, longitudinal, patients on OET such as aromatase inhibitors (AIs) or selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), measuring adherence, persistence, or acceptability.

RESULTS

Out of 895 articles identified, 10 articles were included. Majority of patients had early-stage HR+ BC. Two out of two studies incorporating technological intervention, two out of three studies with text communication-based intervention, and three out of five studies with verbal communication-based intervention reported significant improvement in OET adherence and/or persistence.

CONCLUSIONS

While the interventions tested so far have shown to improve OET adherence in HR+ BC patients in some studies, there is a need to design combination interventions addressing multiple barriers in this population.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

This study showcases effectiveness of novel interventions to improve OET adherence and the need to further develop patient-centered strategies to benefit all patients with HR+ BC.

Tata Memorial Centre Evidence Based Management of Breast cancer

ABSTRACT

The incidence of breast cancer is increasing rapidly in urban India due to the changing lifestyle and exposure to risk factors. Diagnosis at an advanced stage and in younger women are the most concerning issues of breast cancer in India. Lack of awareness and social taboos related to cancer diagnosis make women feel hesitant to seek timely medical advice. As almost half of women develop breast cancer at an age younger than 50 years, breast cancer diagnosis poses a huge financial burden on the household and impacts the entire family. Moreover, inaccessibility, unaffordability, and high out-of-pocket expenditure make this situation grimmer. Women find it difficult to get quality cancer care closer to their homes and end up traveling long distances for seeking treatment. Significant differences in the cancer epidemiology compared to the west make the adoption of western breast cancer management guidelines challenging for Indian women. In this article, we intend to provide a comprehensive review of the management of breast cancer from diagnosis to treatment for both early and advanced stages from the perspective of low-middle-income countries. Starting with a brief introduction to epidemiology and guidelines for diagnostic modalities (imaging and pathology), treatment has been discussed for early breast cancer (EBC), locally advanced, and MBC. In-depth information on loco-regional and systemic therapy has been provided focusing on standard treatment protocols as well as scenarios where treatment can be de-escalated or escalated.

Development of a prognostic nomogram for lymph node positive HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients: a study of SEER database and a Chinese cohort

Background

The hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer (BC) patients account for the largest proportion in all patients and are still at high risk of long-range recurrence. This current study aimed to construct a prognostic nomogram to predict 3-year and 5-year BC-specific survival (BCSS) in HR+/HER2- BC patients with axillary lymph node metastasis.

Methods

A total of 25,338 HR+/HER2- patients with axillary lymph node-positive BC were enrolled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and randomly divided into the training (n=17,738) and validation (n=7,600) cohorts using a ratio of 7:3. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression hazards were used to build a prognostic nomogram based on the training cohort. The nomogram was validated with two independent cohorts. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots were used to evaluate the performance of the model, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were applied to test the clinical utility of the risk stratification system.

Results

Twelve factors including age, race, marital status, grade, T stage, N stage, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and metastasis to the bone, brain, lung and liver were identified and incorporated to construct the nomogram (P<0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) values at 3- and 5-year in the training and internal validation sets were 0.800, 0.800, 0.831 and 0.819, respectively, while those of the external set were 0.765 and 0.735, indicating a satisfactory discrimination with our nomogram. The calibration curves showed highly consistent results for the actual and predicted survival probabilities. Furthermore, patients were divided into three risk groups according to the total scores of the nomogram. The risk stratification system accurately differentiated between patients with different BCSS rates.

Conclusions

We constructed the first nomogram and corresponding risk stratification system to predict the 3-year and 5-year BCSS for HR+/HER2- patients with lymph node-positive BC, indicating a satisfactory accuracy and clinical application.

Genetic Testing Enhances the Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer

The contemporary comprehension of breast cancer has progressed to the molecular level. As a heterogeneous malignancy, conventional pathological diagnosis and histological classification could no longer meet the needs of precisely managing breast cancer. Genetic testing based on gene expression profiles and gene mutations has emerged and substantially contributed to the precise diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Multigene assays (MGAs) are explored for early-stage breast cancer patients, aiding the selection of adjuvant therapy and predicting prognosis. For metastatic breast cancer patients, testing specific genes indicates potentially effective antitumor agents. In this review, genetic testing in early-stage and metastatic breast cancer is summarized, as well as the advantages and challenges of genetic testing in breast cancer.

MIRS: An AI scoring system for predicting the prognosis and therapy of breast cancer

Tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and metastasis are crucial characteristics for tumorigenesis. However, the potential role of their combination in breast cancer (BRCA) remains elusive. Herein, on the basis of quantifying TIICs and tumor metastasis together, we established a precise prognostic scoring system named metastatic and immunogenomic risk score (MIRS) using a neural network model. MIRS showed better performance when compared with other published signatures. MIRS stratifies patients into a high risk subtype (MIRShigh) and a low risk subtype (MIRSlow). The MIRShigh patients exhibit significantly lower survival rate compared with MIRSlow patients (P < 0.0001 ), higher response to chemotherapy, but lower response to immunotherapy. Conversely, higher infiltration level of TIICs and significantly prolonged survival (P = 0.029 ) are observed in MIRSlow patients, indicating sensitive response in immunotherapy. This work presents a promising indicator to guide treatment options of the BRCA population and provides a predicted webtool that is almost universally applicable to BRCA patients.

Ten-year update: NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-42 randomized trial: extended letrozole therapy in early-stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-42 trial evaluated extended letrozole therapy (ELT) in postmenopausal breast cancer patients who were disease free after 5 years of aromatase inhibitor (AI)-based therapy. Seven-year results demonstrated a nonstatistically significant trend in disease-free survival (DFS) in favor of ELT. We present 10-year outcome results.

METHODS

In this double-blind, phase III trial, patients with stage I-IIIA hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, disease free after 5 years of an AI or tamoxifen followed by an AI, were randomly assigned to 5 years of letrozole or placebo. Primary endpoint was DFS, defined as time from random assignment to breast cancer recurrence, second primary malignancy, or death. All statistical tests are 2-sided.

RESULTS

Between September 2006 and January 2010, 3966 patients were randomly assigned (letrozole: 1983; placebo: 1983). Median follow-up time for 3923 patients included in efficacy analyses was 10.3 years. There was statistically significant improvement in DFS in favor of letrozole compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.74 to 0.96; P  = .01; 10-year DFS: placebo = 72.6%, letrozole = 75.9%, absolute difference = 3.3%). There was no difference in the effect of letrozole on overall survival (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.82 to 1.15; P  = .74). Letrozole statistically significantly reduced breast cancer-free interval events (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.91; P = .003; absolute difference in cumulative incidence = 2.7%) and distant recurrences (HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.92; P = .01; absolute difference = 1.8%). The rates of osteoporotic fractures and arterial thrombotic events did not differ between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The beneficial effect of ELT on DFS persisted at 10 years. Letrozole also improved breast cancer-free interval and distant recurrences without improving overall survival. Careful assessment of potential risks and benefits is necessary for selecting appropriate candidates for ELT.

Precision medicine in extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, the evolving role of currently available genomic assays for hormone receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer in the selection of patients for extended adjuvant endocrine therapy will be discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies have investigated the prognostic performance of the Oncotype DX, Breast Cancer Index (BCI), Prosigna, and EndoPredict genomic assays in the late recurrence setting (>5 years after diagnosis), beyond standardly used clinicopathologic parameters, with mixed results. Recently, BCI has also been validated to predict the likelihood of benefit from extended endocrine therapy, though certain data limitations may need to be addressed to justify routine use in clinical practice.

SUMMARY

Even after 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy, patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer have a significant risk for late recurrence, including distant metastases, that might be prevented with longer durations of endocrine therapy. However, the added toxicity and variable benefit derived from extended endocrine therapy make optimal patient selection crucial. Genomic assays are in development to risk-stratify patients for late recurrence and determine efficacy of extended endocrine therapy, with the aim to help guide extended endocrine therapy decisions for clinicians and individualize treatment strategies for patients.

Recommandations francophones pour la pratique clinique concernant la prise en charge des cancers du sein de Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022-2023

With more than 60,000 new cases of breast cancer in mainland France in 2023 and 8% of all cancer deaths, breast cancer is the leading cancer in women in terms of incidence and mortality. While the number of new cases has almost doubled in 30 years, the percentage of patients at all stages alive at 5 years (87%) and 10 years (76%) testifies to the major progress made in terms of screening, characterisation and treatment. However, this progress, rapid as it is, needs to be evaluated and integrated into an overall strategy, taking into account the characteristics of the disease (stage and biology), as well as those of the patients being treated. These are the objectives of the St Paul-de-Vence recommendations for clinical practice. We report here the summary of the votes, discussions and conclusions of the Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022-2023 RPCs.

The Role of Nodes and Nodal Assessment in Diagnosis, Treatment and Prediction in ER+, Node-Positive Breast Cancer

The majority of breast cancers are oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+). In ER+ cancers, oestrogen acts as a disease driver, so these tumours are likely to be susceptible to endocrine therapy (ET). ET works by blocking the hormone's synthesis or effect. A significant number of patients diagnosed with breast cancer will have the spread of tumour cells into regional lymph nodes either at the time of diagnosis, or as a recurrence some years later. Patients with node-positive disease have a poorer prognosis and can respond less well to ET. The nodal metastases may be genomically similar or, as is becoming more evident, may differ from the primary tumour. However, nodal metastatic disease is often not assessed, and treatment decisions are almost always based on biomarkers evaluated in the primary tumour. This review will summarise the evidence in the field on ER+, node-positive breast cancer, including diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and predictive tools.

Breast cancer survival and incidence of second primary cancers after 30 years in a randomized study of two versus five years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy

BACKGROUND

Tamoxifen is an established treatment for breast cancer, but its long-term effects on survival and on secondary cancers are not fully evaluated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We studied 30 years outcome of 4124 postmenopausal patients who were randomized to receive (totally) two or five years of adjuvant tamoxifen.

RESULTS

After 5 years of follow-up, when tamoxifen treatment was finished in both groups, until 15 years of follow-up, overall mortality (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.90, p < 0.001), breast cancer mortality for all patients (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.94, p = 0.006) and breast cancer mortality for patients with estrogen receptor positive disease (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.83, p < 0.001) were significantly reduced in the five-year group as compared to the two-year group. After 15 years, the difference remained but did not further increase. In the five-year group, the incidence of contralateral breast cancer was gradually reduced during the entire period of observation. The incidence of lung cancer was also reduced in the five-year group. In contrast there was an increased endometrial cancer incidence in the five-year group and for those receiving 40 mg of tamoxifen this incidence was further increased.

CONCLUSION

Three more years of tamoxifen therapy reduced the risk of breast cancer mortality. The difference was established during the first 15 years after randomization. Moreover, the incidence of contralateral breast cancer gradually decreased for 30 years. The incidence of lung cancer was reduced in the five-year group. In contrast the incidence of endometrial cancer was increased.

Systemic therapy for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early stage and metastatic breast cancer

Hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer is defined by the presence of the estrogen receptor and/or the progesterone receptor and the absence of HER2 gene amplification. HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer accounts for 65%-70% of all breast cancers, and incidence increases with increasing age. Treatment varies by stage, and endocrine therapy is the mainstay of treatment in both early stage and late-stage disease. Combinations with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors have reduced distant recurrence in the early stage setting and improved overall survival in the metastatic setting. Chemotherapy is used based on stage and tumor biology in the early stage setting and after endocrine resistance for advanced disease. New therapies, including novel endocrine agents and antibody-drug conjugates, are now changing the treatment landscape. With the availability of new treatment options, it is important to define the optimal sequence of treatment to maximize clinical benefit while minimizing toxicity. In this review, the authors first discuss the pathologic and molecular features of HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer and mechanisms of endocrine resistance. Then, they discuss current and emerging therapies for both early stage and metastatic HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, including treatment algorithms based on current data.

SEOM-GEICAM-SOLTI clinical guidelines for early-stage breast cancer (2022)

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer in women in Spain and its annual incidence is rapidly increasing. Thanks to the screening programs in place, nearly 90% of breast cancer cases are detected in early and potentially curable stages, despite the COVID-19 pandemic possibly having impacted these numbers (not yet quantified). In recent years, locoregional and systemic therapies are increasingly being directed by new diagnostic tools that have improved the balance between toxicity and clinical benefit. New therapeutic strategies, such as immunotherapy, targeted drugs, and antibody-drug conjugates have also improved outcomes in some patient subgroups. This clinical practice guideline is based on a systematic review of relevant studies and on the consensus of experts from GEICAM, SOLTI, and SEOM.

Extended Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Early Breast Cancer Patients-Review and Perspectives

Seventy percent of all breast cancer subtypes are hormone receptor-positive. Adjuvant endocrine therapy in these patients plays a key role. Despite the traditional duration of a 5-year intake, the risk of relapse remains elevated in a substantial proportion of patients. Several trials report that the risk of late recurrence is reduced by the extension of adjuvant endocrine therapy beyond 5 years. However, the optimal duration of endocrine therapy is still a matter of debate. The newer data only show a marginal benefit resulting from extension beyond 7 to 10 years. Furthermore, extension may be associated with more side effects. Thus, the adequate selection of patients qualifying for an extended adjuvant therapy is of importance. Tools/genomic tests, which include the characteristics of the patient and the tumor, may help to better identify patients with a risk of a late relapse. Taken together, the magnitude of benefit for extended adjuvant endocrine therapy is based on the precise estimation of the risk of relapse after 5 years. This must be balanced against the long-term side effects of endocrine treatment and the competing risks. For patients with an intermediate risk, 7 years appears to be the optimal duration, and in those with high-risk features, endocrine therapy up to 10 years may be considered.

Consensus guidelines for the management of HR-positive HER2/neu negative early breast cancer in India, SAARC region and other LMIC by DELPHI survey method

BACKGROUND

Precise prognostication is the key to optimum and effective treatment planning for early-stage hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2/neu negative breast cancer patients. Differences in the breast cancer incidence and tumor anatomical features at diagnosis, pharmacogenomics data between Western and Indian women along with the vast diversity in the economic status and differences in insurance policies of these regions; suggest recommendations put forward for Western women might not be applicable to Indian/Asian women. Opinions from oncologists through a voting survey on various prognostic factors/tools to be considered for planning adjuvant therapy are consolidated in this report for the benefit of oncologists of the sub-continent, SAARC and Asia's LMIC (low and middle-income countries).

METHODS

A three-phase DELPHI survey was conducted to collect opinions on prognostic factors considered for planning adjuvant therapy in early-stage HR+/HER2/neu negative breast cancer patients. A panel of 25 oncologists with expertise in breast cancer participated in the survey conducted in 2021. The experts provided opinions as 'agree' or disagree' or 'not sure' in phases-1 and 2 which were conducted virtually; in the final phase-3, all the panel experts met in person and concluded the survey.

RESULTS

Opinions on 41 statements related to prognostic factors/tools and their implications in planning adjuvant endocrine/chemotherapy were collected. All the statements were supported by the latest data from the clinical trials (prospective/retrospective). The statements with opinions of consensus less than 66% were disseminated in phase-2, and later in phase-3 with supporting literature. In phase-3, all the opinions from panelists were consolidated and guidelines were framed.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus guideline will assist oncologists of India, SAARC and LMIC countries in informed clinical decision-making on adjuvant treatment in early HR+/HER2/neu negative breast cancer patients.

IL17RB expression is associated with malignant cancer behaviors and poor prognosis in oral cancer

OBJECTIVES

Previously, we demonstrated that IL17RB plays an essential role in lung cancer progression. This study aimed to determine whether IL17RB correlates with oral cancer and promotes oral cancer progression.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

IL17RB expression in oral cancer tissues and normal tissues was determined by immunohistochemistry staining, while the association of IL17RB expression with the clinicopathological characteristics of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients was analyzed and its correlation with progression-free survival and response to radiotherapy and chemotherapy in OSCC patients was also explored. Western blotting was performed to investigate the expression of IL17RB in various OSCC cell lines; moreover, transwell assay was performed to evaluate the effect of IL17RB expression on cell migration ability.

RESULTS

In this study, we found that IL17RB was expressed higher in OSCC tissues compared to normal oral mucosa tissues and its expression was positively correlated with tumor size, lymph node metastasis, advanced cancer stage, and poor prognosis. In vitro study showed that IL17RB expression in OSCC cell lines as determined by Western blotting, was positively correlated with their migration ability.

CONCLUSION

Clinical and in vitro studies suggest that IL17RB might serve as an independent risk factor and a therapeutic target for oral cancer.

A scoping review of statistical methods in studies of biomarker-related treatment heterogeneity for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Many scientific papers are published each year and substantial resources are spent to develop biomarker-based tests for precision oncology. However, only a handful of tests is currently used in daily clinical practice, since development is challenging. In this situation, the application of adequate statistical methods is essential, but little is known about the scope of methods used.

METHODS

A PubMed search identified clinical studies among women with breast cancer comparing at least two different treatment groups, one of which chemotherapy or endocrine treatment, by levels of at least one biomarker. Studies presenting original data published in 2019 in one of 15 selected journals were eligible for this review. Clinical and statistical characteristics were extracted by three reviewers and a selection of characteristics for each study was reported.

RESULTS

Of 164 studies identified by the query, 31 were eligible. Over 70 different biomarkers were evaluated. Twenty-two studies (71%) evaluated multiplicative interaction between treatment and biomarker. Twenty-eight studies (90%) evaluated either the treatment effect in biomarker subgroups or the biomarker effect in treatment subgroups. Eight studies (26%) reported results for one predictive biomarker analysis, while the majority performed multiple evaluations, either for several biomarkers, outcomes and/or subpopulations. Twenty-one studies (68%) claimed to have found significant differences in treatment effects by biomarker level. Fourteen studies (45%) mentioned that the study was not designed to evaluate treatment effect heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies evaluated treatment heterogeneity via separate analyses of biomarker-specific treatment effects and/or multiplicative interaction analysis. There is a need for the application of more efficient statistical methods to evaluate treatment heterogeneity in clinical studies.

Incorporating clinicopathological and molecular risk prediction tools to improve outcomes in early HR+/HER2- breast cancer

Stratification of recurrence risk is a cornerstone of early breast cancer diagnosis that informs a patient's optimal treatment pathway. Several tools exist that combine clinicopathological and molecular information, including multigene assays, which can estimate risk of recurrence and quantify the potential benefit of different adjuvant treatment modalities. While the tools endorsed by treatment guidelines are supported by level I and II evidence and provide similar prognostic accuracy at the population level, they can yield discordant risk prediction at the individual patient level. This review examines the evidence for these tools in clinical practice and offers a perspective of potential future risk stratification strategies. Experience from clinical trials with cyclin D kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in the setting of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer is provided as an illustrative example of risk stratification.

Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: An Old Story with a New End

Breast cancer is the second most frequent cancer in the world. It is a heterogeneous disease and the leading cause of cancer mortality in women. Advances in molecular technologies allowed for the identification of new and more specifics biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and risk prediction, enabling personalized treatments, improving therapy, and preventing overtreatment, undertreatment, and incorrect treatment. Several breast cancer biomarkers have been identified and, along with traditional biomarkers, they can assist physicians throughout treatment plan and increase therapy success. Despite the need of more data to improve specificity and determine the real clinical utility of some biomarkers, others are already established and can be used as a guide to make treatment decisions. In this review, we summarize the available traditional, novel, and potential biomarkers while also including gene expression profiles, breast cancer single-cell and polyploid giant cancer cells. We hope to help physicians understand tumor specific characteristics and support decision-making in patient-personalized clinical management, consequently improving treatment outcome.

A Review of Endocrine Therapy in Early-stage Breast Cancer: The Journey From Crudeness to Precision

Endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard of care for hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer in the adjuvant setting. However, response to ET can vary across patient subgroups. Historically, hormone receptor expression and clinical stage are the main predictors of the benefit of ET. A "window of opportunity" trials has raised significant interest in recent years as a means of assessing the sensitivity of a patient's cancer to short-term neoadjuvant ET, which provides important prognostic information, and helps in decision-making regarding treatment options in a time-efficient and cost-efficient manner. In the era of genomics, molecular profiling has led to the discovery and evaluation of the prognostic and predictive abilities of new molecular profiles. To realize the goal of personalized medicine, we are in urgent need to explore reliable biomarkers or genomic signatures to accurately predict the clinical response and long-term outcomes associated with ET. Validation of these biomarkers as reliable surrogate endpoints can also lead to a revolution in the clinical trial designs, and potentially avoid the need for repeated tissue biopsies in the surveillance of disease response. The clinical potential of tumor genomic profiling marks the beginning of a new era of precision medicine in breast cancer treatment.

Molecular Profiling in Early ER + Breast Cancer to Aid Systemic Therapy Decisions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clinical decisions for (neo)adjuvant treatment in early breast cancer (eBC) have been based mostly on clinical factors over the last decades. We have reviewed development and validation of such assays in the HR + /HER2 eBC and discuss possible future directions in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing knowledge about the biology of hormone-sensitive eBC, based on the precise and reproducible multigene expression analysis, has led to a significant change in the treatment pathways and reduction of overtreatment in particular by chemotherapy in HR + /HER2 eBC with up to 3 positive lymph nodes based on results from several retrospective-prospective trials used several genomic assays and in particular prospective trials (TAILORx, RxPonder, MINDACT, and ADAPT used OncotypeDX® and Mammaprint®). Precise evaluation of tumor biology together with endocrine responsiveness assessment appears as promising tools for individualized treatment decisions together with clinical factors and menopausal status in early hormone-sensitive/HER2-negative breast cancer.

Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Postmenopausal, Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer

There is now a deeper understanding of the biology of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (EBC) that can be used to inform assessment of risk and prognosis, and also guide more effective adjuvant systemic therapies. For postmenopausal HR+ EBC endocrine therapy remains the mainstay of treatment with extended duration up to 10 years for some, the addition of targeted CDK 4/6 inhibitors for those with node-positive high-risk disease, and de-escalation of chemotherapy use for those in whom it is unlikely to be of benefit. As such, systemic adjuvant therapy is now highly tailored and individualized.

Molecular Classification of Breast Cancer: Relevance and Challenges

CONTEXT.—

Appropriate patient management requires precise and meaningful tumor classification. Breast cancer classification continues to evolve from traditional morphologic evaluation to more sophisticated systems with the integration of new knowledge from research being translated into practice. Breast cancer is heterogeneous at the molecular level, with diversified patterns of gene expression, which is presumably responsible for the difference in tumor behavior and prognosis. Since the beginning of this century, new molecular technology has been gradually applied to breast cancer research on issues pertinent to prognosis (prognostic signature) and therapeutic prediction (predictive signature), and much progress has been made.

OBJECTIVE.—

To summarize the current state and the prospective future of molecular classification of breast cancer.

DATA SOURCES.—

Sources include recent medical literature on molecular classification of breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Identification of intrinsic tumor subtypes has set a foundation for refining the breast cancer molecular classification. Studies have explored the genetic features within the intrinsic cancer subtypes and have identified novel molecular targets that led to the innovation of clinical assays to predict a patient's prognosis and to provide specific guidelines for therapeutic decisions. With the development and implication of these molecular tools, we have remarkably advanced our knowledge and enhanced our power to provide optimal management to patients. However, challenges still exist. Besides accurate prediction of prognosis, we are still in urgent need of more molecular predictors for tumor response to therapeutic regimes. Further exploration along this path will be critical for improving a patient's prognosis.

Genomic assays for lobular breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

One of the current challenges in breast cancer is the appropriate treatment of invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) and defining the high-risk group within ILC. The biological character of ILC typically translates to a good prognosis, however, several studies have indicated that the long-term prognosis is worse than for patients diagnosed with the more commonly invasive ductal carcinoma. Many genomic tests are now available to determine whether those patients are at high risk (HR) and enable tailored treatment. Unfortunately, most of the studies in which these genomic tests have been evaluated entail retrospective analysis of a prospective trial.

AIM

This review focuses on the validation of the available genomic assays based on trials performed in ILC patients, where in some instances, the various subtypes of ILC (classical, pleomorphic, and non-classic type) were taken into account.

RESULTS

Using Oncotype DX in retrospective studies, only 1.3%-8% of ILC tumors were categorized as HR tumors. For MammaPrint, 24% of patients were classified as HR, which was associated with poor outcome. In a recent sub-analysis of the MINDACT study comprising 487 ILC patients, 16.2% were high genomic risk. EndoPredict, Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay, and the Breast Cancer Index have been validated in patients receiving only endocrine treatment.

CONCLUSION

Although ILC accounts for the second most common breast cancer subtype in women, none of these tests encompass tumor morphology in their algorithms. Prospective studies on ILC with genomic assays are warranted given the various subtypes of and treatment options for this underestimated, but frequently occurring cancer.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

Genomic assays can be employed in ILC patients to predict the risk of recurrence and identify those patients who might benefit from chemotherapy in addition to their standard treatment regimen.

Correlative studies of the Breast Cancer Index (HOXB13/IL17BR) and ER, PR, AR, AR/ER ratio and Ki67 for prediction of extended endocrine therapy benefit: a Trans-aTTom study

BACKGROUND

Multiple clinical trials demonstrate consistent but modest benefit of adjuvant extended endocrine therapy (EET) in HR + breast cancer patients. Predictive biomarkers to identify patients that benefit from EET are critical to balance modest reductions in risk against potential side effects of EET. This study compares the performance of the Breast Cancer Index, BCI (HOXB13/IL17BR, H/I), with expression of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and androgen receptors (AR), and Ki67, for prediction of EET benefit.

METHODS

Node-positive (N+) patients from the Trans-aTTom study with available tissue specimen and BCI results (N = 789) were included. Expression of ER, PR, AR, and Ki67 was assessed by quantitative immunohistochemistry. BCI (H/I) gene expression analysis was conducted by quantitative RT-PCR. Statistical significance of the treatment by biomarker interaction was evaluated by likelihood ratio tests based on multivariate Cox proportional models, adjusting for age, tumor size, grade, and HER2 status. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate correlations between BCI (H/I) versus ER, PR, AR, Ki67 and AR/ER ratio.

RESULTS

EET benefit, measured by the difference in risk of recurrence between patients treated with tamoxifen for 10 versus 5 years, is significantly associated with increasing values of BCI (H/I) (interaction P = 0.01). In contrast, expression of ER (P = 0.83), PR (P = 0.66), AR (P = 0.78), Ki67 (P = 0.87) and AR/ER ratio (P = 0.84) exhibited no significant relationship with EET benefit. BCI (H/I) showed a very weak negative correlation with ER (r = - 0.18), PR (r = - 0.25), and AR (r = - 0.14) expression, but no correlation with either Ki67 (r = 0.04) or AR/ER ratio (r = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

These findings are consistent with the growing body of evidence that BCI (H/I) is significantly predictive of response to EET and outcome. Results from this direct comparison demonstrate that expression of ER, PR, AR, Ki67 or AR/ER ratio are not predictive of benefit from EET. BCI (H/I) is the only clinically validated biomarker that predicts EET benefit.

Predictors of adherence and the role of primary non-adherence in antihormonal treatment of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Antihormonal treatment for hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer has highly beneficial effects on both recurrence rates and survival. We investigate adherence and persistence in this group of patients.

METHODS

The study population comprised 1192 patients with HR-positive breast cancer who were prescribed adjuvant antihormonal treatment from 2004 to 2013. Adherence was defined as a medical possession ratio (MPR) of ≥80.

RESULTS

Of the 1192 included patients, 903 (75.8%) were adherent and 289 (24.2%) were non-adherent. Primary non-adherence was seen in 101 (8.5%) patients. The extremes of age (< 40 and ≥ 80 years) were associated with poor adherence. Patients with metastasis to axillary lymph nodes and those who received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy were more likely to be adherent. Better adherence was also shown for those who switched medication at 2 years after diagnosis. Primary non-adherence seems to be associated with cancers with a good prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to antihormonal therapy for breast cancer is suboptimal. Primary non-adherence occurs among patients with a relatively good prognosis. Non-adherent patients tend to terminate their antihormonal therapy in the initial part of the treatment period. Targeted interventions to improve adherence should be focused on the first part of the treatment period.

The Utility of Breast Cancer Index (BCI) Over Clinical Prognostic Tools for Predicting the Need for Extended Endocrine Therapy: A Safety Net Hospital Experience

INTRODUCTION

Extended endocrine therapy (EET) benefits select patients with early-stage hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) but also incurs side effects and cost. The Clinical Treatment Score at Five Years (CTS5) is a free tool that estimates risks of late relapse in estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) BC using clinicopathologic factors. The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) incorporates 2 genomic assays to estimate late relapse risk and likelihood of benefit from EET. This retrospective study assesses the utility of BCI in selecting EET candidates in a safety net hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review on 69 women with early-stage HR+, HER2- BC diagnosed at our institution from December 2009 to February 2016 on whom BCI was submitted. The CTS5 score was also calculated to assess clinical risk of late relapse.

RESULTS

Median age was 53 years. All patients included in our analysis had early ER+ HER2-negative BC. Roughly half of the patients (55%) were postmenopausal and 61% were of Hispanic origin. A total of 34 patients (49%) were deemed high-risk (>5%) for late relapse by CTS5, compared to 42 (61%) by BCI. BCI identified 31 (45%) patients that would benefit from EET and of those, 74%% were advised EET. 16 (47%) clinical high-risk patients were advised against EET due to low benefit predicted by BCI. In the clinical low risk group, 9 (26%) were recommended EET based on high benefit predicted by BCI.

CONCLUSION

BCI is reasonable to consider in early-stage HR+ BC and offered clinically relevant information over clinical pathologic information alone.

Extended Adjuvant Endocrine Treatment in Luminal Breast Cancers in the Era of Genomic Tests

In patients with early-stage endocrine receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC), adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for 5 years is the standard of care. However, for some patients, the risk of recurrence remain high for up to 15 years after diagnosis and extended ET beyond 5 years may be a reasonable option. Nevertheless, this strategy significantly increases the occurrence of side effects. Here we summarize the available evidence from randomized clinical trials on the efficacy and safety profile of extended ET and discuss available clinical and genomic tools helpful to select eligible patients in daily clinical practice.

Classic and New Markers in Diagnostics and Classification of Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

With ever-increasing incidence, breast cancer is considered a most diagnosed type of cancer among women worldwide. Breast cancer arises through malignant transformation of ductal or lobular cells in female (or male) breast and the genetic, phenotypic and morphological heterogeneity has an effect on tumour’s behaviour, thereby instigating a need for individual personalized therapy. A traditional assessment of tumour’s characteristics involves a biopsy and histological analysis of a tumour tissue, and in recent years has been accompanied by analysis of molecular biomarkers to enhance the results. In this work we aimed to thoroughly investigate the latest data in this field of study and give a comprehensive review of novel molecular biomarkers of breast cancer and methodologies used to analyse them.

Abstract

Breast cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed form of female’s cancer, and in recent years it has become the most common cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Like many other tumours, breast cancer is a histologically and biologically heterogeneous disease. In recent years, considerable progress has been made in diagnosis, subtyping, and complex treatment of breast cancer with the aim of providing best suited tumour-specific personalized therapy. Traditional methods for breast cancer diagnosis include mammography, MRI, biopsy and histological analysis of tumour tissue in order to determine classical markers such as estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER, PR), cytokeratins (CK5/6, CK14, C19), proliferation index (Ki67) and human epidermal growth factor type 2 receptor (HER2). In recent years, these methods have been supplemented by modern molecular methodologies such as next-generation sequencing, microRNA, in situ hybridization, and RT-qPCR to identify novel molecular biomarkers. MicroRNAs (miR-10b, miR-125b, miR145, miR-21, miR-155, mir-30, let-7, miR-25-3p), altered DNA methylation and mutations of specific genes (p16, BRCA1, RASSF1A, APC, GSTP1), circular RNA (hsa_circ_0072309, hsa_circRNA_0001785), circulating DNA and tumour cells, altered levels of specific proteins (apolipoprotein C-I), lipids, gene polymorphisms or nanoparticle enhanced imaging, all these are promising diagnostic and prognostic tools to disclose any specific features from the multifaceted nature of breast cancer to prepare best suited individualized therapy.

Breast cancer gene expression signatures: development and clinical significance-a narrative review

Background and Objective

Breast cancer gene expression signatures are developing rapidly and are expected to better understand the intrinsic features of the tumor, and also to optimize the treatment strategy in clinical practice. This review is to summarize the controversy and consensus in clinical practice of gene expression signatures, and to provide our perspective on these issues as well as recommendation for future direction.

Methods

We reviewed English publications in PubMed related to breast cancer gene expression signatures from 2002 to 2022.

Key Content and Findings

Five mature commercial gene expression signatures: Oncotype, MammaPrint, Prosigna/PAM50, EndoPredict and Breast Cancer Index (BCI) are available to provide the prognostic and predictive assessment. Although they could help to evaluate the risk of recurrence and to predict the benefits of certain treatments, their applications remain challenging. Treatment decisions should be determined by a combination of related clinical pathological factors in clinical practice.

Conclusions

Gene expression signatures could assist in the determination of the adjuvant therapy of early-stage breast cancer. The prospective randomized clinical trials showed that chemotherapy may be exempted in low-risk patients. More sufficient data are expected for the application in radiotherapy, extended endocrine therapy, and neoadjuvant treatment. The treatment cannot be determined by a single factor but by comprehensive assessments of clinicopathological factors, test purpose, and cost-effectiveness. Patients will benefit from personalized treatments with the publication of further evidence.

A Nomogram for Predicting Liver Metastasis of Lymph-Node Positive Luminal B HER2 Negative Subtype Breast Cancer by Analyzing the Clinicopathological Characteristics of Patients with Breast Cancer

Background: Luminal B-like human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (Luminal B [HER2-]) is the most common molecular subtype of breast cancer (BC). Since the relationship between Luminal B (HER2-) BC and liver metastasis (LM) is poorly defined, this retrospective study aimed to develop an LM risk nomogram for patients with lymph node-related (N + Luminal B [HER2-]) BC. Methods: Data were obtained for patients initially diagnosed with BC from the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital. There were 30,975 Chinese female patients with stage I-III BC and follow-up confirming 1217 subsequent patients with LM, and 427 patients with N + Luminal B (HER2-). The LM risk was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression, histogram, Venn diagram, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with further analysis for patients with N + Luminal B (HER2-) BC. A nomogram was established based on the N + Luminal B (HER2-) BC data, which was validated using calibration plots. Results: The median age of 427 patients with N + Luminal B (HER2-) liver metastasis of breast cancer (BCLM) was 49 years. The largest number of patients with BCLM was diagnosed between the second to the 6th year, the longest interval from initial BC diagnosis to subsequent LM was 145 months. The patients with LM as the first site of distant metastasis which is associated with better survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier. The nomogram was constructed for the risk of LM that included age, menstrual status, unilateral oophorectomy, pregnancy, hepatitis B antigen, region of residence, tumor size, lymph node, clavicular lymph nodes, progesterone receptor, and lymph vessel invasion. Conclusion: We described the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with stage I-III BC, and constructed a nomogram for calculating personalized LM probabilities for patients with N + Luminal B (HER2-), which could guide future prolonged or early extensive treatment decisions.

A transcriptional network of cell cycle dysregulation in noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinoma

Human cancers display a restricted set of expression profiles, despite diverse mutational drivers. This has led to the hypothesis that select sets of transcription factors act on similar target genes as an integrated network, buffering a tumor’s transcriptional state. Noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinoma (NIPUC) with higher cell cycle activity has higher risk of recurrence and progression. In this paper, we describe a transcriptional network of cell cycle dysregulation in NIPUC, which was delineated using the ARACNe algorithm applied to expression data from a new cohort (n = 81, RNA sequencing), and two previously published cohorts. The transcriptional network comprised 121 transcription factors, including the pluripotency factors SOX2 and SALL4, the sex hormone binding receptors ESR1 and PGR, and multiple homeobox factors. Of these 121 transcription factors, 65 and 56 were more active in tumors with greater and less cell cycle activity, respectively. When clustered by activity of these transcription factors, tumors divided into High Cell Cycle versus Low Cell Cycle groups. Tumors in the High Cell Cycle group demonstrated greater mutational burden and copy number instability. A putative mutational driver of cell cycle dysregulation, such as homozygous loss of CDKN2A, was found in only 50% of High Cell Cycle NIPUC, suggesting a prominent role of transcription factor activity in driving cell cycle dysregulation. Activity of the 121 transcription factors strongly associated with expression of EZH2 and other members of the PRC2 complex, suggesting regulation by this complex influences expression of the transcription factors in this network. Activity of transcription factors in this network also associated with signatures of pluripotency and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), suggesting they play a role in driving evolution to invasive carcinoma. Consistent with this, these transcription factors differed in activity between NIPUC and invasive urothelial carcinoma.

Breast cancer: an up-to-date review and future perspectives

Breast cancer is the most common cancer worldwide. The occurrence of breast cancer is associated with many risk factors, including genetic and hereditary predisposition. Breast cancers are highly heterogeneous. Treatment strategies for breast cancer vary by molecular features, including activation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), hormonal receptors (estrogen receptor [ER] and progesterone receptor [PR]), gene mutations (e.g., mutations of breast cancer 1/2 [BRCA1/2] and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha [PIK3CA]) and markers of the immune microenvironment (e.g., tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte [TIL] and programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1]). Early-stage breast cancer is considered curable, for which local-regional therapies (surgery and radiotherapy) are the cornerstone, with systemic therapy given before or after surgery when necessary. Preoperative or neoadjuvant therapy, including targeted drugs or immune checkpoint inhibitors, has become the standard of care for most early-stage HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, followed by risk-adapted post-surgical strategies. For ER-positive early breast cancer, endocrine therapy for 5-10 years is essential. Advanced breast cancer with distant metastases is currently considered incurable. Systemic therapies in this setting include endocrine therapy with targeted agents, such as CDK4/6 inhibitors and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive disease, anti-HER2 targeted therapy for HER2-positive disease, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and immunotherapy currently for part of triple-negative disease. Innovation technologies of precision medicine may guide individualized treatment escalation or de-escalation in the future. In this review, we summarized the latest scientific information and discussed the future perspectives on breast cancer.

Tailoring neoadjuvant treatment of HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers: Which role for gene expression assays?

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer (BC) increases surgical and conservative surgery chances. However, a significant proportion of patients will not be eligible for conservative surgery following NACT because of large tumor size and/or low chemosensitivity, especially for hormone receptor (HR)-positive/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumors, for which pathological complete response rates are lower than for other BC subtypes. On the other hand, for luminal BC neoadjuvant endocrine therapy could represent a valid alternative. Several gene expression assays have been introduced into clinical practice in last decades, in order to define prognosis more accurately than clinico-pathological features alone and to predict the benefit of adjuvant treatments. A series of studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using core needle biopsy for gene expression risk testing, finding a high concordance rate in the risk result between biopsy sample and surgical samples. Based on these premises, recent efforts have focused on the utility of gene expression signatures to guide therapeutic decisions even in the neoadjuvant setting. Several prospective and retrospective studies have investigated the correlation between gene expression risk score from core needle biopsy before neoadjuvant therapy and the likelihood of 1) clinical and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, 2) conservative surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, and 3) survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the potential clinical utility of the main commercially available gene expression panels (Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, EndoPredict, Prosigna/PAM50 and Breast Cancer Index) in the neoadjuvant setting, in order to better inform decision making for luminal BC beyond the exclusive contribution of clinico-pathological features.

Clinical Utility of Genomic Assay in Node-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among women in Canada. Adjuvant treatment in early BC can reduce the risk of BC recurrence. Historically, the decision for adjuvant chemotherapy for early BC was made only based on clinical and tumour characteristics. In recent years, there has been an effort toward developing genomic assays as a predictive and prognostic tool to improve precision in estimating disease recurrence, sensitivity to systemic treatment and ultimately with clinical utility for guidance regarding adjuvant systemic treatment(s). There are various commercial genomic tests available for early-stage ER+/HER-2 negative BC. This paper will review the Oncotype DX 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS), MammaPrint, EndoPredict, Prosigna®, and Breast Cancer Index (BCI) genomic assays. We will also focus on these genomic assays’ clinical application and utility in node-positive early-stage BC based on the most recent evidence and guidance recommendations.

Appraising Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Hormone Receptor Positive HER2-Negative Breast Cancer—A Literature Review

Background: Approximately 75% of breast cancer (BC) is associated with luminal differentiation expressing endocrine receptors (ER). For ER+ HER2− tumors, adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) is the cornerstone treatment. Although relapse events steadily continue, the ET benefits translate to dramatically lengthen life expectancy with bearable side-effects. This review of ER+ HER2− female BC outlines suitable adjuvant treatment strategies to help guide clinical decision making around appropriate therapy. Methods: A literature search was conducted in Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Libraries, using ER+ HER−, ET BC keywords. Results: In low-risk patients: five years of ET is the standard option. While Tamoxifen remains the preferred selection for premenopausal women, AI is the choice for postmenopausal patients. In the high-risk category: ET plus/minus OFS with two years of Abemaciclib is recommended. Although extended ET for a total of ten years is an alternative, the optimal AI duration is undetermined; nevertheless an additional two to three years beyond the initial five years may be sufficient. In this postmenopausal group, bisphosphonate is endorsed. Conclusions: Classifying the risk category assists in deciding the treatment route and its optimal duration. Tailoring the breadth of ET hinges on a wide array of factors to be appraised for each individualized case, including weighing its benefits and harms.

Update on prognostic and predictive biomarkers of breast cancer

Breast cancer represents a heterogeneous group of human cancer at both histological and molecular levels. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are the most commonly used biomarkers in clinical practice for making treatment plans for breast cancer patients by oncologists. Recently, PD-L1 testing plays an important role for immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer. With the increased understanding of the molecular characterization of breast cancer and the emergence of novel targeted therapies, more potential biomarkers are needed for the development of more personalized treatments. In this review, we summarized several main prognostic and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer at genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic levels, including hormone receptors, HER2, Ki67, multiple gene expression assays, PD-L1 testing, mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, PIK3CA, ESR1 andNTRK and briefly introduced the roles of digital imaging analysis in breast biomarker evaluation.

Tamoxifen use and potential effects on liver parenchyma: A long-term prospective transient elastographic evaluation

Tamoxifen is a commonly prescribed drug in both early and metastatic breast cancer. Prospective studies in Asian populations demonstrated that tamoxifen‐related liver steatosis occurred in more than 30% of the patients within 2 years after start of treatment. No well‐designed prospective studies on potential tamoxifen‐related liver steatosis have been conducted in Caucasian patients so far. Therefore, our prospective study aimed to assess the incidence of tamoxifen‐related liver steatosis for a period of 2 years in a population of Caucasian breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. Patients with an indication for adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen were included in this study. Data were collected at 3 months (T1) and at 2 years (T2) after start of tamoxifen treatment (follow‐up period of 21 months). For the quantification of liver steatosis, patients underwent liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography with simultaneous controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) determination using the FibroScan. A total of 95 Caucasian breast cancer patients were included in this evaluation. Liver steatosis was observed in 46 of 95 (48%) and 48 of 95 (51%) of the patients at T1 and T2, respectively. No clinically relevant increase in liver steatosis was observed during the treatment period of 2 years with tamoxifen (median CAP = 243 ± 49 dB/m (T1) and 253 ± 55 dB/m (T2), respectively; p = 0.038). Conclusion: In this prospective longitudinal study in Caucasian breast cancer patients, no clinically relevant alterations in liver steatosis in terms of CAP values and liver/lipid parameters were observed after 2 years of tamoxifen treatment. This study therefore demonstrates an absence of tamoxifen‐related adverse events such as steatosis and (early) development of fibrosis or cirrhosis during a treatment period of at least 2 years.

A look at current and potential treatment approaches for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer

The heterogeneity of hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancers reinforces the importance of individualized, risk-adapted treatment approaches. Numerous factors contribute to the risk for recurrence, including clinical tumor features, individual biomarkers, and genomic risk. Current standard approaches for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, early stage disease focus on endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. The specific treatment regimen and duration of adjuvant therapy should be selected based on accurate risk assessment, tolerability of available therapies, and consideration for patient preferences. For patients with high-risk features, such as highly proliferative tumors, large tumor size, and significant nodal involvement, the risk for recurrence remains clinically significant despite appropriate adjuvant treatment with current standards of care. This has driven investigation into novel treatment approaches, including the addition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors to adjuvant endocrine therapy. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibition has demonstrated significant efficacy in patients with high-risk, HR-positive, HER2-negative, nonmetastatic breast cancer and now offers a new strategy to greatly improve outcomes in this difficult to treat patient population.; LAY SUMMARY: Hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancers are highly diverse and need to be managed differently for individual patients. The use of adjuvant endocrine therapy and chemotherapy should be driven by a patient's risk for recurrence, preferences, and risk for side effects. Patients with high-risk tumors have a persistently elevated risk for recurrence despite current standards of care. Emerging cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors are highly effective when added to endocrine therapy in high-risk, HR-positive early breast cancer and have the potential to improve patient outcomes in this difficult to treat patient population.

Breast Cancer Index Is a Predictive Biomarker of Treatment Benefit and Outcome from Extended Tamoxifen Therapy: Final Analysis of the Trans-aTTom Study

PURPOSE

The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) HOXB13/IL17BR (H/I) ratio predicts benefit from extended endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early-stage breast cancer. Here, we report the final analysis of the Trans-aTTom study examining BCI (H/I)'s predictive performance.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

BCI results were available for 2,445 aTTom trial patients. The primary endpoint of recurrence-free interval (RFI) and secondary endpoints of disease-free interval (DFI) and disease-free survival (DFS) were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression and log-rank test.

RESULTS

Final analysis of the overall study population (N = 2,445) did not show a significant improvement in RFI with extended tamoxifen [HR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-1.16; P = 0.401]. Both the overall study population and N0 group were underpowered due to the low event rate in the N0 group. In a pre-planned analysis of the N+ subset (N = 789), BCI (H/I)-High patients derived significant benefit from extended tamoxifen (9.7% absolute benefit: HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14-0.75; P = 0.016), whereas BCI (H/I)-Low patients did not (-1.2% absolute benefit; HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.76-1.64; P = 0.581). A significant treatment-to-biomarker interaction was demonstrated on the basis of RFI, DFI, and DFS (P = 0.037, 0.040, and 0.025, respectively). BCI (H/I)-High patients remained predictive of benefit from extended tamoxifen in the N+/HER2- subgroup (9.4% absolute benefit: HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.81; P = 0.047). A three-way interaction evaluating BCI (H/I), treatment, and HER2 status was not statistically significant (P = 0.849).

CONCLUSIONS

Novel findings demonstrate that BCI (H/I) significantly predicts benefit from extended tamoxifen in HR+ N+ patients with HER2- disease. Moreover, BCI (H/I) demonstrates significant treatment to biomarker interaction across survival outcomes.

Study on the Conduction Analysis and Blocking Intervention Scheme of Emotional Disorders between Cancer Patients and Their Families

Objective

To analyze the transmission and blocking intervention scheme of emotional disorders between cancer patients and their families.

Methods

About 150 patients with cancer and 150 family members with mood disorders treated in a tertiary hospital in North China from March 2021 to Octobor2021 were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned into control group and study group. The control group received routine intervention, and the study group received the diagnosis, intervention, and treatment strategies of doctor-patient-affective disorder. The factors related to the transmission of emotional disorders between cancer patients and their families were analyzed, and the alterations of anxiety, depression, social support, and satisfaction of the two groups were compared under different blocking intervention schemes.

Results

(1) Univariate analysis indicated that there were significant differences in family age, family income, sex, location of tumor, course of disease, TNM stage, somatic symptoms, and the incidence of anxiety and depression. There exhibited no significant difference between the gender of the family, the years of education of the family, the occupational status of the family, the relationship between the family and the patient, the mode of payment of the patient's medical expenses, the age of the patient, the mode of treatment of the patient, the degree of knowledge of the disease, and the incidence of anxiety and depression (P > 0.05). The anxiety and depression status of relatives were taken as dependent variables, and the age of family members, family income status, sex of patients, location of tumor, course of disease, TNM stage, and physical symptoms of patients were taken as independent variables, and the data were analyzed by Logistic regression analysis. Logistic regression analysis indicated that family income, tumor location, disease course, TNM stage, and somatic symptoms were the risk factors of anxiety and depression in relatives. (2) Comparison of social support status and intergroup, the objective support, subjective support, support utilization, and total score of social support in the study group were higher compared to the control group. In terms of the depression score before intervention, there exhibited no significant difference (P > 0.05), but after intervention, the depression score of the two groups decreased, and the depression score of the study group was lower compared to the control group before intervention, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks after intervention (P < 0.05). In terms of the anxiety score before intervention, there exhibited no significant difference (P > 0.05), but after intervention, the anxiety score of the two groups decreased, and the anxiety score of the study group was lower compared to the control group before intervention, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks after intervention (P < 0.05). Comparison of the satisfaction between the two groups and the study group was very satisfied in 56 cases, satisfactory in 14 cases, and general in 5 cases, and the satisfaction rate was 100.00%. The control group was very satisfied in 35 cases, satisfactory in 23 cases, general in 12 cases, and dissatisfied in 5 cases, and the satisfaction rate was 93.33%. The satisfaction of the study group was higher compared to the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Family income, tumor location, course of disease, TNM stage, and somatic symptoms are the risk factors of anxiety and depression in relatives. After establishing the diagnosis, intervention and treatment strategies of doctor-patient-affective disorder, the emotional disorder of family members of cancer patients, is significantly promoted, and the intervention satisfaction is high, so the scheme is worth promoting.