Hyperkalemia in Pediatric Severe Malaria

Severe malaria remains an important global cause of mortality, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where the majority of deaths occur in children under 5 years of age. Hyperkalemia in severe malaria has not been very well reported but is associated with increased mortality. Severe malaria has several features that predispose patients to hyperkalemia, including acute kidney injury, hemolysis, metabolic acidosis, and severe anemia requiring blood transfusion. Our objective is to discuss the epidemiology of hyperkalemia in severe malaria, provide an overview of potassium homeostasis, and discuss risk factors for elevated potassium levels in severe malaria, as well as management strategies considering the resource-limited settings where malaria is endemic.

Stewart's theory and acid-base changes induced by crystalloid infusion in humans: a randomized physiological trial

BACKGROUND

Stewart's acid-base theory states that, under isocapnic conditions, crystalloid infusion affects plasma pH due to changes in strong ion difference and total weak acid concentration: a comprehensive study also assessing renal response and hemodilution effects has not been conducted in humans. We aimed to evaluate Stewart's approach during crystalloid infusion in humans.

METHODS

In this randomized trial, patients undergoing surgery with minimal blood losses were randomized to receive to normal saline (chloride content 154 mEq/L, strong ion difference 0 mEq/L), lactated Ringer's (chloride content 112 mEq/L, strong ion difference 29 mEq/L) or Crystalsol (chloride content 98 mEq/L, strong ion difference 50 mEq/L): patients received 10 ml/kg immediately after intubation, and 20 ml/kg after 2 h. Plasma/urinary acid-base and electrolytes were measured before study start and then at prespecified timepoints. The primary endpoint was pH one hour after the second fluid bolus: secondary outcomes included urinary/plasmatic electrolyte concentrations and strong ion difference during the study.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were enrolled (15 in each group). The extent of hemodilution achieved with the first (median [Interquartile range]: saline 9% [6-15], Ringer's 7% [4-9], Crystalsol 8% [5-12]) and the second fluid bolus (saline 13% [5-17], Ringer's 12% [9-15], Crystalsol 15% [10-20]) was not different between groups (p = 0.39 and p = 0.19, respectively). Patients in saline group received more chloride (449 mEq [383-495]) vs. Ringer's (358 mEq [297-419]) and Crystalsol groups (318 mEq [240-366]) (p = 0.001). One hour after the second bolus, pH was lower in saline group (7.34 [7.32-7.36]) vs. Ringer's (7.40 [7.35-7.43) and Crystalsol groups (7.42 [7.38-7.44]) (both p < 0.01), since plasma chloride increased significantly over time in saline group but not in Ringer's and Crystalsol groups. Overall chloride urinary excretion was not different between study groups (saline 36 mEq [28-64], Ringer's 42 mEq [29-68], Crystalsol 44 mEq [27-56], p = 0.60) but, at the end of experiments, urinary chloride concentration was higher and diuresis was lower in saline group vs. Ringer's and Crystalsol groups (p = 0.01, p = 0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with Stewart's approach, crystalloid solutions with high chloride content lower pH due to reduced strong ion difference, progressive hemodilutional acidosis and limited renal response to chloride load.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03507062) on April, 24th 2018.

Plasma-lyte solution versus saline in kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

The optimal intravenous fluid for kidney transplantation (KT) is still controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of plasma-lyte solution (PL) versus saline (NS) in kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted across four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing plasma-lyte and saline in kidney transplantation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Meta-analyses of delayed graft function (DGF), creatinine levels, urine output, blood pH, bicarbonate, base excess, electrolytes, serum chloride, potassium and sodium immediately post-surgery were performed.

RESULTS

Totally six randomized controlled studies with 1197 patients were included. In comparison to the NS group, the PL group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of DGF (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.86, P =  0.002) and reduced serum chloride (MD: -8.87, 95% CI: -13.50 to -4.25, P = 0.0002) as well as serum sodium(MD: -1.08, 95% CI: -1.54 to -0.61, P <  0.00001), while blood pH(MD: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.07, P <  0.00001), bicarbonate (MD: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.21 to 2.97, P = 0.005), and base excess levels (MD: 2.42, 95% CI: 0.72 to 4.11, P <  0.00001) were significantly elevated. No statistically significant differences were observed in creatinine, urine output, or potassium concentrations between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety between plasma-lyte and saline in kidney transplantation. Plasma-lyte reduced delayed graft function in kidney transplant compared to saline.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42024588701).

Haemodynamic management of septic shock

Septic shock is a significant challenge in the management of patients with burns and traumatic injuries when complicated by infection, necessitating prompt and effective haemodynamic support. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current strategies for vasopressor and fluid management in septic shock, with the aim to optimize patient outcomes. With regard to vasopressor management, we elaborate on the pharmacologic profiles and clinical applications of catecholamines, vasopressin derivatives, angiotensin II, and other vasoactive agents. Noradrenaline remains central to septic shock management. The addition of vasopressin, when sequentially added to noradrenaline, offers a non-catecholaminergic vasoactive effect with some clinical benefits and risks of adverse effects. Emerging agents such as angiotensin II and hydroxocobalamin are highlighted for their roles in catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. Next, for fluid management, crystalloids are currently preferred for initial resuscitation, with balanced crystalloids showing benefits over saline. The application of albumin in septic shock warrants further research. High-quality evidence does not support large-volume fluid resuscitation, and an individualized strategy based on haemodynamic parameters, including lactate clearance and capillary refill time, is recommended. The existing knowledge suggests that early vasopressor initiation, particularly noradrenaline, may be critical in cases where fluid resuscitation takes inadequate effect. Management of refractory septic shock remains challenging, with novel agents like angiotensin II and methylene blue showing potential in recent studies. In conclusion, Further research is needed to optimize haemodynamic management of septic shock, particularly in developing novel vasopressor usage and fluid management approaches.

Selection of intraoperative fluid for kidney transplantation

The kidney, the most frequently transplanted organ, represents the optimal treatment for end-stage renal disease. Transplanted kidneys are highly vulnerable to perioperative injuries such as hypotension and hypovolemia, which can be influenced by perioperative fluid management. Postoperatively, delayed graft function increases the risk of graft failure. Although adequate volume administration can reduce delayed graft function, the type of intraoperative fluid most likely to benefit and support graft function remains unclear. Traditionally, crystalloids have been the primary choice for fluid management during kidney transplantation. Among these, 0.9% sodium chloride is the most commonly used, as its potassium-free composition minimizes the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with end-stage renal disease. Albumin is not routinely used, whereas synthetic colloids are discouraged owing to their nephrotoxicity. To date, 0.9% sodium chloride has demonstrated fewer advantages compared with balanced crystalloids, particularly regarding acid-base homeostasis, electrolyte balance, and delayed graft function. This review aims to examine the existing evidence on the effect of crystalloids and colloids on postoperative graft function and to recommend an appropriate fluid regimen, including balanced crystalloids, for kidney transplantation.

Balanced Electrolyte Solutions Versus 0.9% Saline for Kidney Transplantation: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Perioperative intravenous fluids are administered to kidney transplant recipients to maintain hemodynamic stability and graft perfusion; however, the ideal fluid remains uncertain. Although 0.9% saline (saline) is commonly used, its high chloride content causes hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and may increase the risks of delayed graft function (DGF) and hyperkalemia. Balanced electrolyte solutions (BES) have a more physiological chloride concentration and may reduce these risks. Previous meta-analyses found insufficient evidence to compare BES with saline for these outcomes; however, new studies have recently been published. In this updated review, we compared the effects of BES with saline on the risk of DGF and hyperkalemia in kidney transplantation.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing BES with saline in kidney transplantation. The primary outcomes were DGF and hyperkalemia. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias and data were pooled for analysis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework was used to assess the quality of evidence.

Results

Ten studies involving 1532 participants were included. The quality of evidence was high for deceased donor transplantation and very low for living donor transplantation. The relative risk (RR) of DGF associated with BES compared with saline was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.96; P = 0.01) in deceased donor transplantation. There was no difference in DGF in living donor transplantation (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.26-2.41; P = 0.68). There was no difference in hyperkalemia between groups (RR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.59-1.27; P = 0.46).

Conclusions

Compared with saline, BES reduces the risk of DGF in deceased donor kidney transplantation without increasing hyperkalemia.

Fluid management of acute kidney injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is commonly encountered in critical care medicine as is intravenous fluid therapy. It is accepted that there is interplay between fluid use and AKI, both potentially positive and negative. An understanding of the physiological rationale for fluid is important to help clinicians when considering fluid therapy in patients with, or at risk for AKI; this includes understanding choice of fluid, method of monitoring, administration and clinical sequelae.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is increasing interest in combining both static and dynamic measures to assess fluid balance, fluid responsiveness effects of fluid therapy, which are areas requiring ongoing study to translate this theory into clinically useful practice at the bedside. Whilst the debate of choice of crystalloid in ICU practice continues, further evidence for benefits for balanced solutions emerges in the form of international guidelines and patient data meta-analysis of previously performed trials.

SUMMARY

This review assesses the physiological rationale for fluid use in ICU cohorts with AKI of various types, as well as a systematic approach for choice of fluid therapy using a number of different variables, which aims to help guide clinicians in managing fluid use and fluid balance in critically ill patients with AKI.

Comparative efficacy of balanced crystalloids versus 0.9% saline on delayed graft function and perioperative outcomes in kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function after kidney transplantation is linked to poor graft survival and increased chronic allograft injury. Recent guidelines suggest using balanced crystalloids over 0.9% saline owing to better metabolic profiles, but their impact on DGF remains unclear.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Registry of Clinical Trials from inception until February 29, 2024, and included RCTs that randomised adult participants to receive either intravenous balanced fluids or 0.9% saline intraoperatively. We pooled data using a random-effects model and present risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed individual study risk of bias using the modified Cochrane tool and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Outcomes analysed were delayed graft function incidence, vasopressor requirements, length of hospital stay, and postoperative metabolic profiles.

RESULTS

Of 106 publications identified, we included 11 RCTs (n=1717). Pooled analysis showed that the use of balanced fluids was associated with a lower incidence of delayed graft function compared with 0.9% saline (RR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.98, P=0.01, moderate certainty). Balanced crystalloids were associated with higher postoperative serum pH, higher serum bicarbonate, and lower serum chloride concentration, but effects on vasopressor requirements, length of hospital stay, and serum creatinine were uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

Balanced crystalloid intravenous fluid therapy reduced delayed graft function incidence and maintained more favourable serum chemistry profiles compared with 0.9% saline in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. However, crystalloid type did not significantly influence vasopressor requirements and length of hospital stay.

Perioperative fluid management: evidence-based consensus recommendations from the international multidisciplinary PeriOperative Quality Initiative

Fluid therapy is an integral component of perioperative management. In light of emerging evidence in this area, the Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) convened an international multiprofessional expert meeting to generate evidence-based consensus recommendations for fluid management in patients undergoing surgery. This article provides a summary of the recommendations for perioperative fluid management of surgical patients from the preoperative period until hospital discharge and for all types of elective and emergency surgery, apart from burn injuries and head and neck surgery. Where evidence was lacking, recommendations for future research were generated. Specific recommendations are made for fluid management in elective major noncardiac surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, thoracic surgery, neurosurgery, minor noncardiac surgery under general anaesthesia, and critical illness. There are ongoing gaps in knowledge resulting in variation in practice and some disagreement with our consensus recommendations. Perioperative fluid management should be individualised, taking into account the type of surgery and important patient factors, including intravascular volume status and acute and chronic comorbidities. Recommendations are made for further research in perioperative fluid management to address important gaps.

Use of fluid therapy in perioperative adult patients: A narrative review

The administration of intravenous fluids is the most common intervention in hospitalised patients in the perioperative setting and critical care units. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of balanced solutions for fluid therapy in the perioperative period in adult patients, and to review new trends and solutions in fluid therapy. The evidence was grouped into 3 areas: intraoperative fluid administration, fluid administration in critically ill patients, and the importance / benefit of balanced crystalloid solutions. Although a number of high-quality studies have been published in recent years, the scientific evidence regarding the type of fluid, the dose, and rate of administration is still limited. The choice of fluid therapy during the perioperative period must be tailored to patient-specific factors, the nature of the surgery, expected fluid loss, and other relevant factors. Finally, more robust clinical evidence and physician training is of the utmost importance.

[Volume therapy: which preparation for which situation?]

The most commonly used fluids for volume therapy are crystalloids and colloids. Crystalloids comprise 0.9% sodium chloride and balanced crystalloids (BC). Colloids can be divided into artificial colloids and human albumin (a natural colloid). Large studies show advantages for BC over 0.9% NaCl with respect to renal endpoints, probably due to the unphysiologically high chloride content of 0.9% NaCl. However, other studies, such as the BaSICS and PLUS trials, showed no significant differences in mortality in a heterogeneous population. Despite this, meta-analyses suggest advantages for BC. Therefore, BC should be preferred, especially in patients at increased risk of acute kidney injury, with acidemia and/or hyperchloremia. Except for specific indications (e.g., in patients with cirrhosis, sepsis resuscitation after initial volume therapy with BC), albumin should not be used. There is clear evidence of harm from hydroxyethyl starch in intensive care patients.

Effects of Balanced Versus Saline-based Solutions on Acute Kidney Injury in Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether balanced solutions can reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery compared with saline.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Single tertiary care center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery between June 2014 and July 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Balanced solution-based chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid strategy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was acute kidney injury within 7 postoperative days, as defined by the 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Clinical Practice Guideline. The incidence of acute kidney injury was 4.4% (8/180) in the balanced group and 7.3% (13/178) in the saline group. The difference was not statistically significant (risk difference, -2.86%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.72% to 2.01%; risk ratio, 0.61, 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.43; p = 0.35). Compared with the balanced group, the saline group had higher levels of intraoperative serum chloride and lower base excess, which resulted in a lower pH.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing off-pump bypass surgery with a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate, the intraoperative balanced solution-based chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy did not decrease the rate of postoperative acute kidney injury compared with the saline-based chloride-liberal intravenous fluid administration strategy.

A balancing act: drifting away from the reflexive use of "ab"normal saline

Maintenance intravenous fluids are the most frequently ordered medications for hospitalized children. Since the American Association of Pediatrics published national guidelines, there has been an increased reflexive use of isotonic solutions, especially 0.9% saline, as a prophylaxis against hyponatremia. In this educational review, we discuss the potential deleterious effects of using 0.9% saline, including the development of hyperchloremia, metabolic acidosis, acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and a proinflammatory state. Balanced solutions with anion buffers cause relatively minimal harm when used in most children. While the literature supporting one fluid choice over the other is variable, we highlight the benefits of balanced solutions over saline and the importance of prescribing fluid therapy that is individualized for each patient.

Balanced Crystalloids Versus Normal Saline in Kidney Transplant Patients: An Updated Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of balanced crystalloids over normal saline for perioperative fluid management during kidney transplantation and its benefits on acid-base and electrolyte balance along with its influence on postoperative clinical outcomes remains a topic of controversy. Therefore, we conducted this review to assess the impact of balanced solutions compared to normal saline on outcomes for kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing balanced lower-chloride solutions to normal saline in renal transplant patients. Our main outcome of interest was delayed graft function (DGF). Additionally, we examined acid-base and electrolyte measurements, along with postoperative renal function. We computed relative risk (RR) using the Mantel-Haenszel test for binary outcomes, and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, and applied DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models to address heterogeneity. Furthermore, we performed a trial sequential analysis (TSA) for all outcomes.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs comprising a total of 1668 patients were included; 832 (49.9%) were assigned to receive balanced solutions. Balanced crystalloids reduced the occurrence of DGF compared to normal saline, with RR of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.94), P = .005; I² = 0%. The occurrence was 25% (194 of 787) in the balanced crystalloids group and 34% (240 of 701) in the normal saline group. Moreover, our TSA supported the primary outcome result and suggests that the sample size was sufficient for our conclusion. End-of-surgery chloride (MD, -8.80 mEq·L -1 ; 95% CI, -13.98 to -3.63 mEq.L -1 ; P < .001), bicarbonate (MD, 2.12 mEq·L -1 ; 95% CI, 1.02-3.21 mEq·L -1 ; P < .001), pH (MD, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.04-0.07; P < .001), and base excess (BE) (MD, 2.41 mEq·L -1 ; 95% CI, 0.88-3.95 mEq·L -1 ; P = .002) significantly favored the balanced crystalloids groups and the end of surgery potassium (MD, -0.17 mEq·L -1 ; 95% CI, -0.36 to 0.02 mEq·L -1 ; P = .07) did not differ between groups. However, creatinine did not differ in the first (MD, -0.06 mg·dL -1 ; 95% CI, -0.38 to 0.26 mg·dL -1 ; P = .71) and seventh (MD, -0.06 mg·dL -1 ; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.06 mg·dL -1 ; P = .30) postoperative days nor urine output in the first (MD, -1.12 L; 95% CI, -3.67 to 1.43 L; P = .39) and seventh (MD, -0.01 L; 95% CI, -0.45 to 0.42 L; P = .95) postoperative days.

CONCLUSIONS

Balanced lower-chloride solutions significantly reduce the occurrence of DGF and provide an improved acid-base and electrolyte control in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.

Perioperative balanced crystalloids versus normal saline during kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

In kidney transplant (KT) surgery, the perioperative administration of intravenous (IV) fluids plays a crucial role, with potential effects on graft function. Our meta-analysis aims to assess the post-KT outcomes of perioperative balanced crystalloids (BC) versus normal saline (NS).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search across five databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The search results were imported into Covidence for article eligibility screening, and all relevant outcome data were synthesized using risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in meta-analysis models within RevMan 5.4.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42023448457.

RESULTS

Pooled data from 15 RCTs with 2,008 participants showed that the rate of delayed graft function (DGF) was significantly lower with BC (RR: 0.78, 95% CI [0.68, 0.91], P = 0.0009). Also, BC was associated with significantly higher post-op blood pH (MD: 0.05, 95% CI [0.03, 0.07], P < 0.01), lower serum chloride (MD: - 7.31, 95% CI [- 10.58, - 3.77], P < 0.01), and sodium (MD: - 1.94, 95% CI [- 3.32, - 0.55], P = 0.006) as compared to NS. However, serum potassium, serum creatinine, and urine output at POD 1 to 7 did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

BC significantly reduced the incidence of DGF, resulting in more stable post-operative acid-base parameters, and lower chloride levels compared to NS. Hence, substituting NS with BC offers a strategy to protect grafts from acidotic and hyperchloremic insults, optimizing KT outcomes.

A pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled trial of Plasma-Lyte-148 versus standard intravenous fluids in children receiving kidney transplants (PLUTO)

Acute electrolyte and acid-base imbalance is experienced by many children following kidney transplant. This is partly because doctors give very large volumes of artificial fluids to keep the new kidney working. When severe, fluid imbalance can lead to seizures, cerebral edema and death. In this pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled trial, we randomly assigned (1:1) pediatric kidney transplant recipients to Plasma-Lyte-148 or standard of care perioperative intravenous fluids (predominantly 0.45% sodium chloride and 0.9% sodium chloride solutions). We then compared clinically significant electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities in the first 72 hours post-transplant. The primary outcome, acute hyponatremia, was experienced by 53% of 68 participants in the Plasma-Lyte-148 group and 58% of 69 participants in the standard fluids group (odds ratio 0·77 (0·34 - 1·75)). Five of 16 secondary outcomes differed with Plasma-Lyte-148: hypernatremia was significantly more frequent (odds ratio 3·5 (1·1 - 10·8)), significantly fewer changes to fluid prescriptions were made (rate ratio 0·52 (0·40-0·67)), and significantly fewer participants experienced hyperchloremia (odds ratio 0·17 (0·07 - 0·40)), acidosis (odds ratio 0·09 (0·04 - 0·22)) and hypomagnesemia (odds ratio 0·21 (0·08 - 0·50)). No other secondary outcomes differed between groups. Serious adverse events were reported in 9% of participants randomized to Plasma-Lyte-148 and 7% of participants randomized to standard fluids. Thus, perioperative Plasma-Lyte-148 did not change the proportion of children who experienced acute hyponatremia compared to standard fluids. However fewer fluid prescription changes were made with Plasma-Lyte-148, while hyperchloremia and acidosis were less common.

A Comparison Between Saline and Balanced Solutions in Kidney Transplants: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective This study aimed to investigate the impact of different types of intravenous fluids - normal saline (NS), lactated Ringer's solution (LR), and PlasmaLyte (PL) - on the acid-base balance and electrolyte concentration following kidney transplant, a common procedure for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Methodology A randomized controlled trial design was employed, wherein the primary parameters analyzed were postoperative pH and serum potassium levels. Postoperative concentrations of serum bicarbonate, sodium, chloride, and creatinine, as well as graft functionality, were assessed as secondary outcomes. These measurements were performed at the start and end of surgery, as well as 24 and 72 hours postoperatively. Results A total of 53 patients were included in the study and randomized into three cohorts: NS, LR, and PL, each of which showed comparability in terms of demographic and transplantation specifics. Notably, patients in the NS group exhibited a more significant decrease in pH (NS group: 7.285 ±0.098, LR group: 7.324 ±0.075, PL group: 7.7338 ±0.059) and bicarbonate levels (17.0 ±4.2, 20.9 ±2.8, 20.0 ±4.5) post 24 hours after the operation and displayed a similar pattern immediately after the surgery. However, there were no discernible differences in potassium (p=0.460), sodium (p=0.681), and chloride (p=0.321) levels across the groups. Furthermore, the study did not observe any significant differences in postoperative graft functionality. Conclusion The use of NS as the intraoperative fluid of choice led to lower pH and bicarbonate levels following kidney transplant, as compared to LR and PL. However, these results did not correlate with improvements in graft functionality.

Intraoperative use of balanced crystalloids versus 0.9% saline: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies

BACKGROUND

The evidence regarding optimal crystalloid use in the perioperative period remains unclear. As the primary aim of this study, we sought to summarise the data from RCTs examining whether use of balanced crystalloids compared with 0.9% saline (saline) leads to differences in patient-important outcomes.

METHODS

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane library, and Clinicaltrials.gov, from inception until December 15, 2022, and included RCTs that intraoperatively randomised adult participants to receive either balanced fluids or saline. We pooled data using a random-effects model and present risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs), along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed individual study risk of bias using the modified Cochrane tool, and certainty of evidence using GRADE.

RESULTS

Of 5959 citations, we included 38 RCTs (n=3776 patients). Pooled analysis showed that intraoperative use of balanced fluids compared with saline had an uncertain effect on postoperative mortality analysed at the longest point of follow-up (RR 1.51, 95% CI: 0.42-5.36) and postoperative need for renal replacement therapy (RR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.56-1.59), both very low certainty. Furthermore, use of balanced crystalloids probably leads to a higher postoperative serum pH (MD 0.05, 95% CI: 0.04-0.06), moderate certainty.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of balanced crystalloids, compared with saline, in the perioperative setting has an uncertain effect on mortality and need for renal replacement therapy but probably improves postoperative acid-base status. Further research is needed to determine whether balanced crystalloid use affects patient-important outcomes.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42022367593.

Balanced crystalloid solution versus saline in deceased donor kidney transplantation (BEST-Fluids): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a major adverse complication of deceased donor kidney transplantation. Intravenous fluids are routinely given to patients receiving a transplant to maintain intravascular volume and optimise graft function. Saline (0·9% sodium chloride) is widely used but might increase the risk of DGF due to its high chloride content. We aimed to test our hypothesis that using a balanced low-chloride crystalloid solution (Plasma-Lyte 148) instead of saline would reduce the incidence of DGF.

METHODS

BEST-Fluids was a pragmatic, registry-embedded, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial at 16 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Adults and children of any age receiving a deceased donor kidney transplant were eligible; those receiving a multi-organ transplant or weighing less than 20 kg were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using an adaptive minimisation algorithm to intravenous balanced crystalloid solution (Plasma-Lyte 148) or saline during surgery and up until 48 h after transplantation. Trial fluids were supplied in identical bags and clinicians determined the fluid volume, rate, and time of discontinuation. The primary outcome was DGF, defined as receiving dialysis within 7 days after transplantation. All participants who consented and received a transplant were included in the intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome. Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned eligible participants who commenced surgery and received trial fluids, whether or not they received a transplant. This study is registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, (ACTRN12617000358347), and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03829488).

FINDINGS

Between Jan 26, 2018, and Aug 10, 2020, 808 participants were randomly assigned to balanced crystalloid (n=404) or saline (n=404) and received a transplant (512 [63%] were male and 296 [37%] were female). One participant in the saline group withdrew before 7 days and was excluded, leaving 404 participants in the balanced crystalloid group and 403 in the saline group that were included in the primary analysis. DGF occurred in 121 (30%) of 404 participants in the balanced crystalloid group versus 160 (40%) of 403 in the saline group (adjusted relative risk 0·74 [95% CI 0·66 to 0·84; p<0·0001]; adjusted risk difference 10·1% [95% CI 3·5 to 16·6]). In the safety analysis, numbers of investigator-reported serious adverse events were similar in both groups, being reported in three (<1%) of 406 participants in the balanced crystalloid group versus five (1%) of 409 participants in the saline group (adjusted risk difference -0·5%, 95% CI -1·8 to 0·9; p=0·48).

INTERPRETATION

Among patients receiving a deceased donor kidney transplant, intravenous fluid therapy with balanced crystalloid solution reduced the incidence of DGF compared with saline. Balanced crystalloid solution should be the standard-of-care intravenous fluid used in deceased donor kidney transplantation.

FUNDING

Medical Research Future Fund and National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), Health Research Council (New Zealand), Royal Australasian College of Physicians, and Baxter.

Crystalloid Solutions in Hospital: A Review of Existing Literature

Intravenous fluids (IVF) like normal saline (NS) and Ringer's lactate (RL) are often crucial in the management of hospitalized patients. Mishandling these fluids can lead to complications in about 20% of patients receiving them. In this review, we present the current evidence through the identification of observational studies and randomized trials that observed the optimal use of IVF. We found that NS may cause hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis in surgical patients, but there is no clear difference in mortality and long-term outcomes between NS and balanced crystalloids. Critically ill patients, particularly those in sepsis, benefit from balanced crystalloids, as high chloride content fluids like NS increase the risk of complications and mortality. In pancreatitis, NS has been shown to increase the risk of ICU admission when compared to RL; however, there is no significant difference in long-term outcomes and mortality between the fluids. RL is preferred for burns due to its isotonicity and lack of protein, preventing edema formation in an already dehydrated state. Plasma-lyte may resolve diabetic ketoacidosis faster, while prolonged NS use can lead to metabolic acidosis, acute kidney injury, and cerebral edema. In conclusion, NS, RL, and plasma-lyte are the most commonly used isotonic IVF in the hospital population. Incorrect choice of fluids in a different clinical scenario can lead to worse outcomes.

Electrolyte derangements in critically ill children receiving balanced versus unbalanced crystalloid fluid resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Adult studies have demonstrated potential harm from resuscitation with 0.9% sodium chloride (0.9%NaCl), resulting in increased utilization of balanced crystalloids like lactated ringers (LR). The sodium and potassium content of LR has resulted in theoretical safety concerns, although limited data exists in pediatrics. We hypothesized that use of LR for resuscitation would not be associated with increased electrolyte derangements compared to 0.9%NaCl.

METHODS

A prospective, observational cohort study of critically ill children who received ≥ 20 ml/kg of fluid resuscitation and were admitted to two pediatric intensive care units from November 2017 to February 2020. Fluid groups included patients who received > 75% of fluids from 0.9%NaCl, > 75% of fluids from LR, and a mixed group. The primary outcome was incidence of electrolyte derangements (sodium, chloride, potassium) and acidosis.

RESULTS

Among 559 patients, 297 (53%) received predominantly 0.9%NaCl, 74 (13%) received predominantly LR, and 188 (34%) received a mixture. Extreme hyperkalemia (potassium ≥ 6 mmol/L) was more common in 0.9%NaCl group (5.8%) compared to LR group (0%), p 0.05. Extreme acidosis (pH > 7.1) was more common in 0.9%NaCl group (11%) compared to LR group (1.6%), p 0.016.

CONCLUSIONS

LR is associated with fewer electrolyte derangements compared to 0.9%NaCl. Prospective interventional trials are needed to validate these findings.

Baseline Characteristics and Representativeness of Participants in the BEST-Fluids Trial: A Randomized Trial of Balanced Crystalloid Solution Versus Saline in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a major complication of deceased donor kidney transplantation. Saline (0.9% sodium chloride) is a commonly used intravenous fluid in transplantation but may increase the risk of DGF because of its high chloride content. Better Evidence for Selecting Transplant Fluids (BEST-Fluids), a pragmatic, registry-based, double-blind, randomized trial, sought to determine whether using a balanced low-chloride crystalloid solution (Plasma-Lyte 148) instead of saline would reduce DGF. We sought to evaluate the generalizability of the trial cohort by reporting the baseline characteristics and representativeness of the trial participants in detail.

METHODS

We compared the characteristics of BEST-Fluids participants with those of a contemporary cohort of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients in Australia and New Zealand using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry. To explore potential international differences, we compared trial participants with a cohort of transplant recipients in the United States using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.

RESULTS

During the trial recruitment period, 2373 deceased donor kidney transplants were performed in Australia and New Zealand; 2178 were eligible' and 808 were enrolled in BEST-Fluids. Overall, trial participants and nonparticipants were similar at baseline. Trial participants had more coronary artery disease (standardized difference [d] = 0.09; P = 0.03), longer dialysis duration (d = 0.18, P < 0.001), and fewer hypertensive (d = -0.11, P = 0.03) and circulatory death (d = -0.14, P < 0.01) donors than nonparticipants. Most key characteristics were similar between trial participants and US recipients, with moderate differences (|d| ≥ 0.2; all P < 0.001) in kidney failure cause, diabetes, dialysis duration, ischemic time, and several donor risk predictors, likely reflecting underlying population differences.

CONCLUSIONS

BEST-Fluids participants had more comorbidities and received slightly fewer high-risk deceased donor kidneys but were otherwise representative of Australian and New Zealand transplant recipients and were generally similar to US recipients. The trial results should be broadly applicable to deceased donor kidney transplantation practice worldwide.

Use of normal saline and incidence of dyselectrolytaemia in children following kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The use of hypotonic fluid, such as 0.45% saline, following kidney transplantation (KT) in children is associated with a high incidence of electrolyte imbalance, especially hyponatraemia. This can result in serious adverse events, such as cerebral oedema and seizures. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of electrolyte disturbance in children when 0.9% saline was the intravenous fluid used in the first 72 h following KT.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational study of 50 consecutive KT undertaken between January 2017 and January 2019 at a single centre.

RESULTS

The median age at KT was 9.2 years (IQR 4-14) and 16 (32%) were females. Thirty-two (64%) were living related donor (LRD) KT and 22 (44%) were carried out in children < 20 kg. The mean volume of fluid administered intra-operatively, and on Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3, were 73 ml/kg, 124 ml/kg, 97 ml/kg and 86 ml/kg, respectively. Hyponatraemia was noted in 4%, hypernatraemia in 18%, hyperkalaemia in 18%, hyperchloraemia in 68% and low bicarbonate was seen in 88%. Fifteen percent of the children had an episode of hyperglycaemia. None of the children developed symptomatic dyselectrolytaemia. There was delayed graft function (DGF) in 4 (8%) recipients - all deceased donor (DD) KT, including 2 who received donations after circulatory death.

CONCLUSIONS

While the use of 0.9% saline is associated with a high incidence of electrolyte disturbances, including hyperkalaemia, it reduces the risk of hyponatraemia. None of the children developed a symptomatic electrolyte abnormality. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Anaesthetic Approach to Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Kidney Transplantation: A Narrative Review

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are designed to reduce medical complications, the length of hospital stays (LoS), and healthcare costs. ERAS is considered safe and effective for kidney transplant (KTx) surgery. KTx recipients are often frail with multiple comorbidities. As these patients follow an extensive diagnostic pathway preoperatively, the ERAS protocol can ideally be implemented at this stage. Small singular changes in a long perioperative pathway can result in significant positive outcomes. We have investigated the current evidence for an ERAS pathway related to anaesthetic considerations in renal transplant surgery for adult recipients.

Effects of the Type of Intraoperative Fluid in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Perioperative fluid management in kidney transplant recipients is crucial to supporting the fluid, acid-base, and electrolyte balance required for graft perfusion. However, the choice of intraoperative crystalloids in kidney transplantation remains controversial. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study to evaluate the impact of intraoperative fluids on acid-base and electrolyte balance and graft outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 282 living donor kidney transplant recipients from January 2010 to December 2017. Patients were classified into two groups based on the type of intraoperative crystalloids used (157 patients in the half saline group and 125 patients in the balanced crystalloid solutions group, Plasma-lyte).

RESULTS

Compared with the half saline group, the Plasma-lyte group showed less metabolic acidosis and hyponatremia during surgery. Hyperkalemia incidence was not significantly different between the two groups. Changes in postoperative graft function assessed by blood urea nitrogen and creatinine were significantly different between the two groups. Patients in the Plasma-lyte group exhibited consistently higher glomerular filtration rates than those in the half saline group at 1 month and 1 year after transplantation after adjusting for demographic differences.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative Plasma-lyte can lead to more favorable results in terms of acid-base balance during kidney transplantation. Patients who received Plasma-lyte showed superior postoperative graft function at 1 month and 1 year after transplantation. Further studies are needed to evaluate the superiority of intraoperative Plasma-lyte over other types of crystalloids in relation to graft outcomes.

Multicentre randomised controlled trial: protocol for Plasma-Lyte Usage and Assessment of Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Children (PLUTO)

INTRODUCTION

Acute electrolyte and acid-base imbalance is experienced by many children following kidney transplantation. When severe, this can lead to complications including seizures, cerebral oedema and death. Relatively large volumes of intravenous fluid are administered to children perioperatively in order to establish perfusion to the donor kidney, the majority of which are from living and deceased adult donors. Hypotonic intravenous fluid is commonly used in the post-transplant period due to clinicians' concerns about the sodium, chloride and potassium content of isotonic alternatives when administered in large volumes.Plasma-Lyte 148 is an isotonic, balanced intravenous fluid that contains sodium, chloride, potassium and magnesium with concentrations equivalent to those of plasma. There is a physiological basis to expect that Plasma-Lyte 148 will reduce the incidence of clinically significant electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities in children following kidney transplantation compared with current practice.The aim of the Plasma-Lyte Usage and Assessment of Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Children (PLUTO) trial was to determine whether the incidence of clinically significantly abnormal plasma electrolyte levels in paediatric kidney transplant recipients will be different with the use of Plasma-Lyte 148 compared with intravenous fluid currently administered.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PLUTO is a pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial comparing Plasma-Lyte 148 to current care in paediatric kidney transplant recipients, conducted in nine UK paediatric kidney transplant centres.A total of 144 children receiving kidney transplants will be randomised to receive either Plasma-Lyte 148 (the intervention) intraoperatively and postoperatively, or current fluid. Apart from intravenous fluid composition, all participants will receive standard clinical transplant care.The primary outcome measure is acute hyponatraemia in the first 72 hours post-transplant, defined as laboratory plasma sodium concentration of <135 mmol/L. Secondary outcomes include symptoms of acute hyponatraemia, other electrolyte and acid-base imbalances and transplant kidney function.The primary outcome will be analysed using a logistic regression model adjusting for donor type (living vs deceased donor), patient weight (<20 kg vs ≥20 kg pretransplant) and transplant centre as a random effect.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial received Health Research Authority approval on 20 January 2020. Findings will be presented to academic groups via national and international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. The patient and public involvement group will play an important part in disseminating the study findings to the public domain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

2019-003025-22 and 16586164.

Statistical analysis plan for Better Evidence for Selecting Transplant Fluids (BEST-Fluids): a randomised controlled trial of the effect of intravenous fluid therapy with balanced crystalloid versus saline on the incidence of delayed graft function in deceased donor kidney transplantation

Background

Delayed graft function, or the requirement for dialysis due to poor kidney function, is a frequent complication of deceased donor kidney transplantation that is associated with inferior outcomes. Intravenous fluids with a high chloride content, such as isotonic sodium chloride (0.9% saline), are widely used in transplantation but may increase the risk of poor kidney function. The primary objective of the BEST-Fluids trial is to compare the effect of a balanced low-chloride crystalloid, Plasma-Lyte 148 (Plasmalyte), versus 0.9% saline on the incidence of DGF in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients. This article describes the statistical analysis plan for the trial.

Methods and design

BEST-Fluids is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, registry-based, multi-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Eight hundred patients (adults and children) in Australia and New Zealand with end-stage kidney disease admitted for a deceased donor kidney transplant were randomised to intravenous fluid therapy with Plasmalyte or 0.9% saline in a 1:1 ratio using minimization. The primary outcome is delayed graft function (dialysis within seven days post-transplant), which will be modelled using a log-binomial generalised linear mixed model with fixed effects for treatment group, minimization variables, and ischaemic time and a random intercept for study centre. Secondary outcomes including early kidney transplant function (a ranked composite of dialysis duration and the rate of graft function recovery), treatment for hyperkalaemia, and graft survival and will be analysed using a similar modelling approach appropriate for the type of outcome.

Discussion

BEST-Fluids will determine whether Plasmalyte reduces the incidence of DGF and has a beneficial effect on early kidney transplant outcomes relative to 0.9% saline and will inform clinical guidelines on intravenous fluids for deceased donor kidney transplantation. The statistical analysis plan describes the analyses to be undertaken and specified before completion of follow-up and locking the trial databases.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000358347. Prospectively registered on 8 March 2017

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03829488. Registered on 4 February 2019

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05989-w.

Anaesthesia for renal transplantation

Renal transplantation is the most common procedure in solid organ transplantation. Compered to dialysis, renal transplantation offers better quality of life and overall survival for patients. Due to the improvement of surgical technique, imunosupressive therapy and medical monitor-ing in general, the outcome of treatment has significantly improved today. The importance of the anesthesiologists and the correct performance of all procedures during this treatment has been shown in many studies related to the outcome. In addition to the correct selection of anesthesia drugs, it is very important to pay attention to the position-ing of the patient, adequate monitoring, careful fluid re-placement and the type of fluid intra-and postoperative, as well as adequate pain control after the procedure.

Battle of the Crystalloids in the Operating Room: A Literature Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to synthesize the evidence regarding the commonalities and differences between the three most common crystalloid solutions used in the operating room (normal saline [NS], lactated Ringer's [LR], and Plasmalyte [PL]) in order to determine best practice.

DESIGN

This study is an integrative review of literature.

METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria included adult patients undergoing surgery who received either NS, LR, and/or PL (or similar solutions) for fluid maintenance therapy.

FINDINGS

A total of 15 articles from 2008 to 2020 conducted in a surgical setting were selected for the review; eleven randomized controlled studies, three observational studies, and one cohort-controlled trial.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest balanced crystalloid solutions are superior to NS in the operating room in terms of maintaining a stable acid-base balance. PL is preferable to LR because it most closely resembles plasma concentration. Future research is needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of the solutions.

Fluid Management During Kidney Transplantation: A Consensus Statement of the Committee on Transplant Anesthesia of the American Society of Anesthesiologists

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative fluid management may affect the outcome after kidney transplantation. However, the amount and type of fluid administered, and monitoring techniques vary greatly between institutions and there are limited prospective randomized trials and meta-analyses to guide fluid management in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) committee on transplantation reviewed the current literature on the amount and type of fluids (albumin, starches, 0.9% saline, and balanced crystalloid solutions) administered and the different monitors used to assess fluid status, resulting in this consensus statement with recommendations based on the best available evidence.

RESULTS

Review of the current literature suggests that starch solutions are associated with increased risk of renal injury in randomized trials and should be avoided in kidney donors and recipients. There is no evidence supporting the routine use of albumin solutions in kidney transplants. Balanced crystalloid solutions such as Lactated Ringer are associated with less acidosis and may lead to less hyperkalemia than 0.9% saline solutions. Central venous pressure is only weakly supported as a tool to assess fluid status.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations may be useful to anesthesiologists making fluid management decisions during kidney transplantation and facilitate future research on this topic.

Perioperative Normal Saline Administration and Delayed Graft Function in Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Perioperative normal saline administration remains common practice during kidney transplantation. The authors hypothesized that the proportion of balanced crystalloids versus normal saline administered during the perioperative period would be associated with the likelihood of delayed graft function.

METHODS

The authors linked outcome data from a national transplant registry with institutional anesthesia records from 2005 to 2015. The cohort included adult living and deceased donor transplants, and recipients with or without need for dialysis before transplant. The primary exposure was the percent normal saline of the total amount of crystalloids administered perioperatively, categorized into a low (less than or equal to 30%), intermediate (greater than 30% but less than 80%), and high normal saline group (greater than or equal to 80%). The primary outcome was the incidence of delayed graft function, defined as the need for dialysis within 1 week of transplant. The authors adjusted for the following potential confounders and covariates: transplant year, total crystalloid volume, surgical duration, vasopressor infusions, and erythrocyte transfusions; recipient sex, age, body mass index, race, number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches, and dialysis vintage; and donor type, age, and sex.

RESULTS

The authors analyzed 2,515 records. The incidence of delayed graft function in the low, intermediate, and high normal saline group was 15.8% (61/385), 17.5% (113/646), and 21% (311/1,484), respectively. The adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) for delayed graft function was 1.24 (0.85 to 1.81) for the intermediate and 1.55 (1.09 to 2.19) for the high normal saline group compared with the low normal saline group. For deceased donor transplants, delayed graft function in the low, intermediate, and high normal saline group was 24% (54/225 [reference]), 28.6% (99/346; adjusted odds ratio, 1.28 [0.85 to 1.93]), and 30.8% (277/901; adjusted odds ratio, 1.52 [1.05 to 2.21]); and for living donor transplants, 4.4% (7/160 [reference]), 4.7% (14/300; adjusted odds ratio, 1.15 [0.42 to 3.10]), and 5.8% (34/583; adjusted odds ratio, 1.66 [0.65 to 4.25]), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

High percent normal saline administration is associated with delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Comparison of normal saline solution with low-chloride solutions in renal transplants: a meta-analysis

Background

Normal saline solution (NSS) has been the fluid of choice for renal transplant patients, but it can lead to hyperchloremic acidosis and hyperkalemia. This study was performed to compare the safety profile of low-chloride solutions with that of NSS in renal transplant patients.

Methods

We conducted a systemic review search on PubMed, Embase, and the Central Cochrane Registry. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and matched cohort studies involving NSS as the control arm and low-chloride solutions as an intervention arm were chosen. The standardized mean difference for continuous variables, the odds ratio (OR) for discrete variables, and a 95% confidence interval (CI) for effect sizes were used. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analysis was performed using a random-effects model irrespective of heterogeneity, which was evaluated using I² statistics.

Results

Nine RCTs and one cohort study with a total of 726 patients were included. After transplantation, serum potassium was significantly lower in the low-chloride group (standardized mean difference compared to NSS group, –0.38 mEq/L; 95% CI, –0.66 to –0.11; p = 0.007). Similarly, postoperative chloride was lower in the low-chloride group (–2.41 mEq/L [–3.34 to –1.48], p < 0.001). No statistically significance was observed in delayed graft function (OR, 0.98 [0.56–1.69], p = 0.93), day 3 creatinine (–0.14 mg/dL [–0.46 to 0.18], p = 0.38), or day 7 urine output (–0.08 L [–0.29 to 0.12], p = 0.43).

Conclusion

Use of NSS during renal transplant leads to increased incidence of hyperchloremic acidosis with subsequent hyperkalemia, but clinical significance in the form of delayed graft function or postoperative creatinine remains comparable to that of low-chloride solutions.

Lactated Ringer's solution versus normal saline in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation: A matched retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

In pediatric living-donor liver transplantation, lactated Ringer's solution and normal saline are commonly used for intraoperative fluid management, but the comparative clinical outcomes remain uncertain.

AIMS

To compare the effect between lactated Ringer's solution and normal saline for intraoperative volume replacement on clinical outcomes among pediatric living-donor liver transplantation patients.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective trial study enrolled children who received either lactated Ringer's solution or normal saline during living-donor liver transplantation between January 2010 and August 2016. The groups with comparable clinical characteristics were balanced by propensity score matching. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes included early allograft dysfunction, primary nonfunction, acute renal injury, and hospital-free days (days alive postdischarge within 30 days of liver transplantation).

RESULTS

We included 333 pediatric patients who met the entry criteria for analysis. Propensity score matching identified 61 patients in each group. After matching, the lactated Ringer's solution group had a higher 90-day mortality rate than the normal saline group (11.5% vs. 0.0%). Early allograft dysfunction and primary nonfunction incidences were also more frequent in the lactated Ringer's solution group (19.7% and 11.5%, respectively) than in the normal saline group (3.3% and 0.0%, respectively). In the lactated Ringer's solution group, four (6.6%) recipients developed acute renal injury within 7 days postoperatively compared with three (4.9%) recipients in the normal saline group. Hospital-free days did not differ between groups (9 days [1-13] vs. 9 days [0-12]).

CONCLUSIONS

For intraoperative fluid management in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation patients, lactated Ringer's solution administration was associated with a higher 90-day mortality rate than normal saline. This finding has important implications for selecting crystalloid in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation. Further randomized clinical trials in larger cohort are necessary to confirm this finding.

Crystalloid and Colloid Compositions and Their Impact

This manuscript will review crystalloid (hypo-, iso-, and hyper-tonic) and colloid (synthetic and natural) fluids that are available for intravenous administration with a focus on their electrolyte, acid-base, colligative, and rheological effects as they relate to each solution's efficacy and safety. The goal is for the reader to better understand the differences between each fluid and the influence on plasma composition, key organ systems, and their implications when used therapeutically in animals with critical illness.

Low- versus High-Chloride Content Intravenous Solutions for Perioperative Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Studies have shown complications of normal saline infusion because of its high-chloride content. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to explore whether the use of low- versus high-chloride solutions benefited the unselected and specifically perioperative patients and was associated with different outcomes.

Methods

Studies on the use of low- versus high-chloride content intravenous solutions for perioperative patients, published up to July 15, 2019, were systematically reviewed, and primary and secondary outcomes were quantitatively summarized.

Results

A total of 14 eligible randomized controlled trials with 943 perioperative patients were included. Five studies reported all-cause mortality, and eight studies provided detailed data on renal replacement therapy (RRT). The pooled result suggested no statistically significant difference in the effect of low- versus high-chloride solutions on all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR) = 1.39; 95%confidence interval (CI) = 0.23–8.26) and RRT (RR = 1.05; 95%CI = 0.63–1.76). The pooled results on acute kidney injury (AKI) and the use of allogenic blood transfusion (P > 0.05) were similar.

Conclusion

Among specific perioperative patients, the use of low- versus high-chloride content intravenous solutions did not reduce the all-cause mortality, risk of severe AKI, or rate of RRT use. Further large randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm or refute this finding.

Clinical physiology aspects of chloremia in fluid therapy: a systematic review

Background

This systematic review discusses a clinical physiology aspect of chloride in fluid therapy. Crystalloid solutions are one of the most widely used remedies. While generally used in medicine for almost 190 years, studies focused largely on their safety have only been published since the new millennium. The most widely used solution, normal saline, is most often referred to in this context. Its excessive administration results in hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis with other consequences, including higher mortality rates.

Methods

Original papers and review articles eligible for developing the present paper were identified by searching online in the electronic MEDLINE database. The keywords searched for included hyperchloremia, hypochloremia, and compound words containing the word “chloride,” infusion therapy, metabolic acidosis, renal failure, and review.

Results

A total of 21,758 papers published before 31 May 2020 were identified; of this number, 630 duplicates were removed from the list. Upon excluding articles based on their title or abstract, 1850 papers were screened, of which 63 full-text articles were assessed.

Conclusions

According to the latest medical concepts, dyschloremia (both hyperchloremia and hypochloremia) represents a factor indisputably having a negative effect on selected variables of clinical outcome. As infusion therapy can significantly impact chloride homeostasis of the body, the choice of infusion solutions should always take into account the potentially adverse impact of chloride content on chloremia and organ function.

Pre-Transplant Plasma Potassium as a Potential Risk Factor for the Need of Early Hyperkalaemia Treatment after Kidney Transplantation: A Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Plasma potassium (K+) abnormalities are common among patients with chronic kidney disease and are associated with higher rates of death, major adverse cardiac events, and hospitalization in this population. Currently, no guidelines exist on how to handle pre-transplant plasma K+ in renal transplant recipients (RTR).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to examine the relation between pre-transplant plasma K+ and interventions to resolve hyperkalaemia within 48 h after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

In a single-centre cohort study, we addressed the association between the last available plasma K+ level before transplantation and the post-transplant need for dialysis or use of K+-lowering medication to resolve hyperkalaemia within 48 h after renal transplantation using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

151 RTR were included, of whom 51 (33.8%) patients received one or more K+ interventions within 48 h after transplantation. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that a higher pre-transplant plasma K+ was associated with an increased risk of post-transplant intervention (odds ratio 2.2 [95% CI: 1.1-4.4]), independent of donor type (deceased or living) and use of K+-lowering medication within 24 h prior to transplantation).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that a higher pre-transplant plasma K+ is associated with a higher risk of interventions necessary to resolve hyperkalaemia within 48 h after renal transplantation. Further research is recommended to determine a cutoff level for pre-transplant plasma K+ that can be used in practice.

The Impact of Intravenous Fluid Therapy on Acid-Base Status of Critically Ill Adults: A Stewart Approach-Based Perspective

One of the most important tasks of physicians working in intensive care units (ICUs) is to arrange intravenous fluid therapy. The primary indications of the need for intravenous fluid therapy in ICUs are in cases of resuscitation, maintenance, or replacement, but we also load intravenous fluid for purposes such as fluid creep (including drug dilution and keeping venous lines patent) as well as nutrition. However, in doing so, some facts are ignored or overlooked, resulting in an acid-base disturbance. Regardless of the type and content of the fluid entering the body through an intravenous route, it may impair the acid-base balance depending on the rate, volume, and duration of the administration. The mechanism involved in acid-base disturbances induced by intravenous fluid therapy is easier to understand with the help of the physical-chemical approach proposed by Canadian physiologist, Peter Stewart. It is possible to establish a quantitative link between fluid therapy and acid–base disturbance using the Stewart principles. However, it is not possible to accomplish this with the traditional approach; moreover, it may not be noticed sometimes due to the normalization of pH or standard base excess induced by compensatory mechanisms. The clinical significance of fluid-induced acid-base disturbances has not been completely clarified yet. Nevertheless, as fluid therapy may be the cause of unexplained acid-base disorders that may lead to confusion and elicit unnecessary investigation, more attention must be paid to understand this issue. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to address the effects of different types of fluid therapies on acid-base balance using the simplified perspective of Stewart principles. Overall, the paper intends to help recognize fluid-induced acid-base disturbance through bedside evaluation and choose an appropriate fluid by considering the acid-base status of a patient.

Intravenous Fluid of Choice in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review

Background

Intravenous fluid therapy plays a role in maintaining the hemodynamic status for tissue perfusion and electrolyte hemostasis during surgery. Recent trials in critically ill patients reported serious side effects of some types of fluids. Since the most suitable type of fluid is debatable, a consensus in perioperative patients has not been reached.

Method

We performed a systematic review of randomized control trials (RCTs) that compared two or more types of fluids in major abdominal surgery. The outcomes were related to bleeding, hemodynamic status, length of hospital stay, and complications, such as kidney injury, electrolyte abnormality, major cardiac adverse event, nausea, vomiting, and mortality. A literature search was performed using Medline and EMBASE up to December 2019. The data were pooled to investigate the effect of fluid on macrocirculation and intravascular volume effect.

Results

Forty-three RCTs were included. Eighteen fluids were compared: nine were crystalloids and nine were colloids. The results were categorized into macrocirculation and intravascular volume effect, microcirculation, anti-inflammatory parameters, vascular permeability, renal function (colloids), renal function and electrolytes (crystalloids), coagulation and bleeding, return of bowel function, and postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV). We found that no specific type of fluid led to mortality and every type of colloid was equivalent in volume expansion and did not cause kidney injury. However, hydroxyethyl starch and dextran may lead to increased bleeding. Normal saline can cause kidney injury which can lead to renal replacement therapy, and dextrose fluid can decrease PONV.

Conclusion

In our opinion, it is safe to give a balanced crystalloid as the maintenance fluid and give a colloid, such as HES130/0.4, 4% gelatin, or human albumin, as a volume expander.

Estimating Creatinine Clearance in the Nonsteady State: The Determination and Role of the True Average Creatinine Concentration

Creatinine clearance is a tenet of nephrology practice. However, with just a single creatinine concentration included in the denominator of the creatinine clearance equation, the resulting value seems to apply only in the steady state. Does the basic clearance formula work in the nonsteady state, and can it recapitulate the kinetic glomerular filtration rate (GFR) equation? In the kinetic state, a nonlinear creatinine trajectory is reducible into a “true average” value that can be found using calculus, proceeding from a differential equation based on the mass balance principle. Using the fundamental theorem of calculus, we prove definitively that the true average is the correct creatinine to divide by, even as the mathematical model accommodates clinical complexities such as volume change and other factors that affect creatinine kinetics. The true average of a creatinine versus time function between 2 measured creatinine values is found by a definite integral. To use the true average to compute kinetic GFR, 2 techniques are demonstrated, a graphical one and a numerical one. We apply this concept to a clinical case of an individual with acute kidney injury requiring dialysis; despite the effects of hemodialysis on serum creatinine concentration, kinetic GFR was able to track the underlying kidney function and provided critical information regarding kidney function recovery. Finally, a prior concept of the maximum increase in creatinine per day is made more clinically objective. Thus, the clearance paradigm applies to the nonsteady state as well when the true average creatinine is used, providing a fundamentally valid strategy to deduce kinetic GFRs from serum creatinine trends occurring in real-life acute kidney injury and kidney recovery.

Perioperative fluid management for major elective surgery

BACKGROUND

Adequate fluid balance before, during and after surgery may reduce morbidity. This review examines current concepts surrounding fluid management in major elective surgery.

METHOD

A narrative review was undertaken following a PubMed search for English language reports published before July 2019 using the terms 'surgery', 'fluids', 'fluid therapy', 'colloids', 'crystalloids', 'albumin', 'starch', 'saline', 'gelatin' and 'goal directed therapy'. Additional reports were identified by examining the reference lists of selected articles.

RESULTS

Fluid therapy is a cornerstone of the haemodynamic management of patients undergoing major elective surgery. Both fluid overload and hypovolaemia are deleterious during the perioperative phase. Zero-balance fluid therapy should be aimed for. In high-risk patients, individualized haemodynamic management should be titrated through the use of goal-directed therapy. The optimal type of fluid to be administered during major surgery remains to be determined.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative fluid management is a key challenge during major surgery. Individualized volume optimization by means of goal-directed therapy is warranted during high-risk surgery. In most patients, balanced crystalloids are the first choice of fluids to be used in the operating theatre. Additional research on the optimal type of fluid for use during major surgery is needed.

Hypertonic sodium lactate improves microcirculation, cardiac function, and inflammation in a rat model of sepsis

BACKGROUND

Hypertonic sodium lactate (HSL) may be of interest during inflammation. We aimed to evaluate its effects during experimental sepsis in rats (cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)).

METHODS

Three groups were analyzed (n = 10/group): sham, CLP-NaCl 0.9%, and CLP-HSL (2.5 mL/kg/h of fluids for 18 h after CLP). Mesenteric microcirculation, echocardiography, cytokines, and biochemical parameters were evaluated. Two additional experiments were performed for capillary leakage (Evans blue, n = 5/group) and cardiac hemodynamics (n = 7/group).

RESULTS

HSL improved mesenteric microcirculation (CLP-HSL 736 [407-879] vs. CLP-NaCl 241 [209-391] UI/pixel, p = 0.0006), cardiac output (0.34 [0.28-0.43] vs. 0.14 [0.10-0.18] mL/min/g, p < 0.0001), and left ventricular fractional shortening (55 [46-73] vs. 39 [33-52] %, p = 0.009). HSL also raised dP/dtmax slope (6.3 [3.3-12.1] vs. 2.7 [2.0-3.9] 103 mmHg/s, p = 0.04), lowered left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-volume relation (1.9 [1.1-2.3] vs. 3.0 [2.2-3.7] RVU/mmHg, p = 0.005), and reduced Evans blue diffusion in the gut (37 [31-43] vs. 113 [63-142], p = 0.03), the lung (108 [82-174] vs. 273 [222-445], p = 0.006), and the liver (24 [14-37] vs. 70 [50-89] ng EB/mg, p = 0.04). Lactate and 3-hydroxybutyrate were higher in CLP-HSL (6.03 [3.08-10.30] vs. 3.19 [2.42-5.11] mmol/L, p = 0.04; 400 [174-626] vs. 189 [130-301] μmol/L, p = 0.03). Plasma cytokines were reduced in HSL (IL-1β, 172 [119-446] vs. 928 [245-1470] pg/mL, p = 0.004; TNFα, 17.9 [12.5-50.3] vs. 53.9 [30.8-85.6] pg/mL, p = 0.005; IL-10, 352 [267-912] vs. 905 [723-1243] pg/mL) as well as plasma VEGF-A (198 [185-250] vs. 261 [250-269] pg/mL, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertonic sodium lactate fluid protects against cardiac dysfunction, mesenteric microcirculation alteration, and capillary leakage during sepsis and simultaneously reduces inflammation and enhances ketone bodies.

Study Protocol for Better Evidence for Selecting Transplant Fluids (BEST-Fluids): a pragmatic, registry-based, multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of intravenous fluid therapy with Plasma-Lyte 148 versus 0.9% saline on delayed graft function in deceased donor kidney transplantation

Background

Delayed graft function, the requirement for dialysis due to poor kidney function post-transplant, is a frequent complication of deceased donor kidney transplantation and is associated with inferior outcomes and higher costs. Intravenous fluids given during and after transplantation may affect the risk of poor kidney function after transplant. The most commonly used fluid, isotonic sodium chloride (0.9% saline), contains a high chloride concentration, which may be associated with acute kidney injury, and could increase the risk of delayed graft function. Whether using a balanced, low-chloride fluid instead of 0.9% saline is safe and improves kidney function after deceased donor kidney transplantation is unknown.

Methods

BEST-Fluids is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, registry-based, multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. The primary objective is to compare the effect of intravenous Plasma-Lyte 148 (Plasmalyte), a balanced, low-chloride solution, with the effect of 0.9% saline on the incidence of delayed graft function in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients. From January 2018 onwards, 800 participants admitted for deceased donor kidney transplantation will be recruited over 3 years in Australia and New Zealand. Participants are randomized 1:1 to either intravenous Plasmalyte or 0.9% saline peri-operatively and until 48 h post-transplant, or until fluid is no longer required; whichever comes first. Follow up is for 1 year. The primary outcome is the incidence of delayed graft function, defined as dialysis in the first 7 days post-transplant. Secondary outcomes include early kidney transplant function (composite of dialysis duration and rate of improvement in graft function when dialysis is not required), hyperkalemia, mortality, graft survival, graft function, quality of life, healthcare resource use, and cost-effectiveness. Participants are enrolled, randomized, and followed up using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry.

Discussion

If using Plasmalyte instead of 0.9% saline is effective at reducing delayed graft function and improves other clinical outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation, this simple, inexpensive change to using a balanced low-chloride intravenous fluid at the time of transplantation could be easily implemented in the vast majority of transplant settings worldwide.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617000358347. Registered on 8 March 2017. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03829488. Registered on 4 February 2019.