1
|
Brouckaert J, Dellgren G, Wallinder A, Rega F. Non-ischaemic preservation of the donor heart in heart transplantation: protocol design and rationale for a randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial across eight European countries. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073729. [PMID: 38154894 PMCID: PMC10759137 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ischaemic cold static storage (ICSS) is the gold standard in donor heart preservation. This ischaemic time frame renders a time constraint and risk for primary graft dysfunction. Cold oxygenated heart perfusion, known as non-ischaemic heart preservation (NIHP), theoretically limits the ischaemic time, while holding on to the known advantage of hypothermia and cardioplegia, a low metabolic rate. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The NIHP 2019 study is an international, randomised, controlled, open, multicentre clinical trial in 15 heart transplantation centres in 8 European countries and includes 202 patients undergoing heart transplantation, allocated 1:1 to NIHP or ICSS. Enrolment is estimated to be 30 months after study initiation. The patients are followed for 12 months after transplantation.The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of NIHP on survival, allograft function and rejection episodes within the first 30 days after transplantation. The secondary objectives are to compare treatment groups with respect to survival, allograft function, cardiac biomarkers, rejection episodes, allograft vasculopathy, adverse events and adverse device effects within 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee (EC) for Research UZ/KU Leuven, Belgium, the coordinating EC in Germany (Bei Der LMU München), the coordinating EC in the UK (West Midlands-South Birmingham Research), the EC of Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain, the EC of Göteborg, Sweden, the coordinating EC in France, the EC of Padova, Italy and the EC of the University of Vienna, Austria. This study will be conducted in accordance with current local regulations and international applicable regulatory requirements according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and ISO14155:2020. Main primary and secondary outcomes will be published on modified intention-to-treat population and per-protocol population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03991923.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Göran Dellgren
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Filip Rega
- Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shahin J, Scales NB, Johara F, Hogue M, Hornby L, Shemie S, Schmidt M, Waldauf P, Duska F, Wind T, Van Mook WN, Dhanani S. Is the process of withdrawal of life-sustaining measures in the intensive care unit different for deceased organ donors compared with other dying patients? A secondary analysis of prospectively collected data. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069536. [PMID: 37597867 PMCID: PMC10441082 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether observable differences exist between patterns of withdrawal of life-sustaining measures (WLSM) for patients eligible for donation after circulatory death (DCD) in whom donation was attempted compared with those patients in whom no donation attempts were made. SETTING Adult intensive care units from 20 centres in Canada, the Czech Republic and the Netherlands. DESIGN Secondary analysis of quantitative data collected as part of a large, prospective, cohort study (the Death Prediction and Physiology after Removal of Therapy study). PARTICIPANTS Patients ≥18 years of age who died after a controlled WLSM in an intensive care unit. Patients were classified as not DCD eligible, DCD eligible with DCD attempted or DCD eligible but DCD was not attempted. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The process of WLSM (timing and type and, if applicable, dosages of measures withdrawn, dosages of analgesics/sedatives) was compared between groups. RESULTS Of the 635 patients analysed, 85% had either cardiovascular support stopped or were extubated immediately on WLSM. Of the DCD eligible patients, more were immediately extubated at the initiation of WLSM when DCD was attempted compared with when DCD was not attempted (95% vs 61%, p<0.0001). Initiation of WLSM with the immediate cessation of cardiovascular measures or early extubation was associated with earlier time to death, even after adjusting for confounders (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.39 to 6.23, at 30 min). Other than in a few patients who received propofol, analgesic and sedative dosing after WLSM between DCD attempted and DCD eligible but not attempted patients was not significantly different. All patients died. CONCLUSIONS Patients in whom DCD is attempted may receive a different process of WLSM. This highlights the need for a standardised and transparent process for end-of-life care across the spectrum of critically ill patients and potential organ donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Shahin
- Division of Critical Care, Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - F Johara
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - M Hogue
- CHEO, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Hornby
- System Development, Canadian Blood Services Organ Donation and Transplantation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sam Shemie
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal Childrens Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- System Development, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Schmidt
- Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
- FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - P Waldauf
- Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
- FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - F Duska
- Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
- FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Tineke Wind
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Heart and Vascular Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - W N Van Mook
- Deparment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sonny Dhanani
- Critical Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qu Z, Oedingen C, Bartling T, Krauth C, Schrem H. Systematic review on the involvement and engagement of patients as advisers for the organisation of organ transplantation services. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072091. [PMID: 37164468 PMCID: PMC10173988 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This systematic review aims to derive practical lessons from publications on patient involvement and engagement in the organisation of organ transplantation services. DESIGN This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Inclusion criteria for the analysis of publications in English cited in the databases PubMed and Web of Science until 6 December 2022 required that patients participated as advisers in the organisation of organ transplantation services. Quality assessment was performed using the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP) 2 small form and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for the assessment of the risks of bias. RESULTS Deployed search strings identified 2263 records resulting in a total of 11 articles. The aims and strategies, deployed methods, observed effects, observed barriers and proposed improvements for the future varied vastly. All reported that well-developed programmes involving and engaging patients at an organisational level provide additional benefits for patients and foster patient-centred care. Lessons learnt include: (1) to empower patients, the information provided to them should be individualised to prioritise their needs; (2) financial as well as organisational resources are important to successfully implement patient involvement and engagement; (3) systematic feedback from patients in organisational structures to health providers is required to improve clinical workflows and (4) the consideration of ethical issues and the relationship between investigators and participating patients should be clarified and reported. CONCLUSIONS Actionable management recommendations could be derived. The quantitative impact on clinical outcome and economic clinical process improvements remains to be investigated. Study quality can be improved using the GRIPP 2 guidance and the CASP tool. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022186467.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi Qu
- Transplant Center, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Carina Oedingen
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tim Bartling
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christian Krauth
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harald Schrem
- General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
- Transplant Center Graz, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vinke JS, Eisenga MF, Sanders JSF, Berger SP, Spikman JM, Abdulahad WH, Bakker SJ, Gaillard CAJM, van Zuilen AD, van der Meer P, de Borst MH. Effect of Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose on Exercise Capacity After Kidney Transplantation (EFFECT-KTx): rationale and study protocol for a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e065423. [PMID: 36948568 PMCID: PMC10040026 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Iron deficiency (ID) is common and has been associated with an excess mortality risk in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). In patients with chronic heart failure and ID, intravenous iron improves exercise capacity and quality of life. Whether these beneficial effects also occur in KTRs is unknown. The main objective of this trial is to address whether intravenous iron improves exercise tolerance in iron-deficient KTRs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Effect of Ferric Carboxymaltose on Exercise Capacity after Kidney Transplantation study is a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial that will include 158 iron-deficient KTRs. ID is defined as plasma ferritin <100 µg/L or plasma ferritin 100-299 µg/L with transferrin saturation <20%. Patients are randomised to receive 10 mL of ferric carboxymaltose (50 mg Fe3+/mL, intravenously) or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution) every 6 weeks, four dosages in total. The primary endpoint is change in exercise capacity, as quantified by the 6 min walk test, between the first study visit and the end of follow-up, 24 weeks later. Secondary endpoints include changes in haemoglobin levels and iron status, quality of life, systolic and diastolic heart function, skeletal muscle strength, bone and mineral parameters, neurocognitive function and safety endpoints. Tertiary (explorative) outcomes are changes in gut microbiota and lymphocyte proliferation and function. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The protocol of this study has been approved by the medical ethical committee of the University Medical Centre Groningen (METc 2018/482;) and is being conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials checklist and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines provided by the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Study results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03769441.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Sj Vinke
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Michele F Eisenga
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan F Sanders
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Stefan P Berger
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jacoba M Spikman
- Department of Neuropsychology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Wayel H Abdulahad
- Department of Immunology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Stephan Jl Bakker
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Carlo A J M Gaillard
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan D van Zuilen
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P van der Meer
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin H de Borst
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Silva A, Arora S, Dhanani S, Rochon A, Giorno LP, Jackson E, Hornby L, Latifi M, Lotherington K, Luctkar-Flude M, Petry S, Wilson L, Silva E Silva V. Quality improvement tools to manage deceased organ donation processes: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070333. [PMID: 36731923 PMCID: PMC9896188 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To collate and summarise the literature on the quality improvement tools that have been developed for deceased organ donation processes after circulatory determination of death and neurological determination of death. DESIGN Scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework. DATA SOURCES We searched for published (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science) and unpublished literature (organ donation organisation websites worldwide). The search was initially conducted on 17 July 2021 and updated on 1 June 2022. Included articles discussed the creation and/or use of quality improvement tools to manage deceased organ donation processes. Two independent reviewers screened the references, extracted and analysed the data. RESULTS 40 references were included in this review, and most records were written in English (n=38), originated in Canada (n=21), published between 2016 and 2022 (n=22), and were specific for donation after neurological determination of death (n=20). The tools identified included checklists, algorithms, flow charts, charts, pathways, decision tree maps and mobile apps. These tools were applied in the following phases of the organ donation process: (1) potential donor identification, (2) donor referral, (3) donor assessment and risk, (4) donor management, (5) withdrawal of life-sustaining measures, (6) death determination, (7) organ retrieval and (8) overall organ donation process. CONCLUSIONS We conducted a thorough investigation of the available quality improvement tools for deceased organ donation processes. The existing evidence lacks details in the report of methods used for development, testing and impact of these tools, and we could not locate tools specific for some phases of the organ donation process. Lastly, by mapping existing tools, we aim to facilitate both clinician choices among available tools, as well as research work building on existing knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amina Silva
- Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Sonny Dhanani
- Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Rochon
- School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Luciana P Giorno
- School of Nursing, Federal University of the ABC, Santo Andre, SP, Brazil
| | - Elayne Jackson
- Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Hornby
- Research Institute, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marzieh Latifi
- Sina Organ procurement unit, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)
| | | | | | - Stefany Petry
- School of Nursing, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martinez-Lopez MV, Coll E, Cruz-Quintana F, Dominguez-Gil B, Hannikainen IR, Lara Rosales R, Pérez-Blanco A, Perez-Marfil MN, Pérez-Villares JM, Uruñuela D, Rodríguez-Arias D. Family bereavement and organ donation in Spain: a mixed method, prospective cohort study protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066286. [PMID: 36609324 PMCID: PMC9827244 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a discrepancy in the literature as to whether authorising or refusing the recovery of organs for transplantation is of direct benefit to families in their subsequent grieving process. This study aims to explore the impact of the family interview to pose the option of posthumous donation and the decision to authorise or refuse organ recovery on the grieving process of potential donors' relatives. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A protocol for mixed methods, prospective cohort longitudinal study is proposed. Researchers do not randomly assign participants to groups. Instead, participants are considered to belong to one of three groups based on factors related to their experiences at the hospital. In this regard, families in G1, G2 and G3 would be those who authorised organ donation, declined organ donation or were not asked about organ donation, respectively. Their grieving process is monitored at three points in time: 1 month after the patient's death, when a semistructured interview focused on the lived experience during the donation process is carried out, 3 months and 9 months after the death. At the second and third time points, relatives' grieving process is assessed using six psychometric tests: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory-II, Inventory of Complicated Grief, The Impact of Event Scale: Revised, Posttraumatic Growth Inventory and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Descriptive statistics (means, SDs and frequencies) are computed for each group and time point. Through a series of regression models, differences between groups in the evolution of bereavement are estimated. Additionally, qualitative analyses of the semistructured interviews are conducted using the ATLAS.ti software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study involves human participants and was approved by Comité Coordinador de Ética de la Investigación Biomédica de Andalucía (CCEIBA) ID:1052-N-21. The results will be disseminated at congresses and ordinary academic forums. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Francisco Cruz-Quintana
- Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | | | - Ivar R Hannikainen
- Department of Philosophy I, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | | | | | - Maria Nieves Perez-Marfil
- Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | | | | | - David Rodríguez-Arias
- Department of Philosophy I, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Molina-Pérez A, Rodríguez-Arias D, Delgado J. Differential impact of opt-in, opt-out policies on deceased organ donation rates: a mixed conceptual and empirical study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057107. [PMID: 36441113 PMCID: PMC9462118 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To increase postmortem organ donation rates, several countries are adopting an opt-out (presumed consent) policy, meaning that individuals are deemed donors unless they expressly refused so. Although opt-out countries tend to have higher donation rates, there is no conclusive evidence that this is caused by the policy itself. The main objective of this study is to better assess the direct impact of consent policy defaults per se on deceased organ recovery rates when considering the role of the family in the decision-making process. This study does not take into account any indirect effects of defaults, such as potential psychological and behavioural effects on individuals and their relatives. DESIGN Based on previous work regarding consent policies, we created a conceptual model of the decision-making process for deceased organ recovery that included any scenario that could be directly influenced by opt-in or opt-out policies. We then applied this model to internationally published data of the consent process to determine how frequently policy defaults could apply. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We measure the direct impact that opt-in and opt-out policies have per se on deceased organ recovery. RESULTS Our analysis shows that opt-in and opt-out have strictly identical outcomes in eight out of nine situations. They only differ when neither the deceased nor the family have expressed a preference and defaults therefore apply. The direct impact of consent policy defaults is typically circumscribed to a range of 0%-5% of all opportunities for organ recovery. Our study also shows that the intervention of the family improves organ retrieval under opt-in but hinders it under opt-out. CONCLUSIONS This study may warn policy makers that, by emphasising the need to introduce presumed consent to increase organ recovery rates, they might be overestimating the influence of the default and underestimating the power granted to families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Molina-Pérez
- Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados (IESA), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Cordoba, Spain
- FiloLab-UGR Scientific Unit of Excellence, Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation, Padua, Italy
| | - David Rodríguez-Arias
- FiloLab-UGR Scientific Unit of Excellence, Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation, Padua, Italy
| | - Janet Delgado
- FiloLab-UGR Scientific Unit of Excellence, Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Transplantation (ELPAT), European Society for Organ Transplantation, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sohani ZN, Butler-Laporte G, Aw A, Belga S, Benedetti A, Carignan A, Cheng MP, Coburn B, Costiniuk CT, Ezer N, Gregson D, Johnson A, Khwaja K, Lawandi A, Leung V, Lother S, MacFadden D, McGuinty M, Parkes L, Qureshi S, Roy V, Rush B, Schwartz I, So M, Somayaji R, Tan D, Trinh E, Lee TC, McDonald EG. Low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (LOW-TMP): protocol for a phase III randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-comparison trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e053039. [PMID: 35863836 PMCID: PMC9310160 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is an opportunistic infection of immunocompromised hosts with significant morbidity and mortality. The current standard of care, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) at a dose of 15-20 mg/kg/day, is associated with serious adverse drug events (ADE) in 20%-60% of patients. ADEs include hypersensitivity reactions, drug-induced liver injury, cytopenias and renal failure, all of which can be treatment limiting. In a recent meta-analysis of observational studies, reduced dose TMP-SMX for the treatment of PJP was associated with fewer ADEs, without increased mortality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A phase III randomised, placebo-controlled, trial to directly compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose TMP-SMX (10 mg/kg/day of TMP) with the standard of care (15 mg/kg/day of TMP) among patients with PJP, for a composite primary outcome of change of treatment, new mechanical ventilation, or death. The trial will be undertaken at 16 Canadian hospitals. Data will be analysed as intention to treat. Primary and secondary outcomes will be compared using logistic regression adjusting for stratification and presented with 95% CI. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been conditionally approved by the McGill University Health Centre; Ethics approval will be obtained from all participating centres. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04851015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra N Sohani
- Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Guillaume Butler-Laporte
- Department of Epidemiology, Occupational Health, and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrew Aw
- Division of Hematology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sara Belga
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrea Benedetti
- Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Occupational Health, and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alex Carignan
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Matthew P Cheng
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bryan Coburn
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cecilia T Costiniuk
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nicole Ezer
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Dan Gregson
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Andrew Johnson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kosar Khwaja
- Department of Epidemiology, Occupational Health, and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alexander Lawandi
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Victor Leung
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sylvain Lother
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Derek MacFadden
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michaeline McGuinty
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leighanne Parkes
- Division of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Salman Qureshi
- Department of Epidemiology, Occupational Health, and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Valerie Roy
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke Hôtel-Dieu, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Barret Rush
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ilan Schwartz
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Miranda So
- Sinai Health System-University Health Network Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ranjani Somayaji
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Darrell Tan
- Division of Infectious Diseases, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emilie Trinh
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Todd C Lee
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Clinical Practice Assessment Unit, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emily G McDonald
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Clinical Practice Assessment Unit, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
von Samson-Himmelstjerna FA, Esser G, Schulte K, Kolbrink B, Krautter M, Schwenger V, Weinmann-Menke J, Matschkal J, Schraml F, Pahl A, Braunisch M, Amann K, Feldkamp T, Kunzendorf U, Renders L, Heemann U. Study protocol: the TRAnsplant BIOpsies (TRABIO) study - a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study to assess the treatment of kidney graft rejections. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e048122. [PMID: 35450886 PMCID: PMC9024278 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite continued efforts, long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation remain unsatisfactory. Kidney graft rejections are independent risk factors for graft failure. At the participating centres of the TRAnsplant BIOpsies study group, a common therapeutic standard has previously been defined for the treatment of graft rejections. The outcomes of this strategy will be assessed in a prospective, observational cohort study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A total of 800 kidney transplantation patients will be enrolled who undergo a graft biopsy because of deteriorating kidney function. Patients will be stratified according to the Banff classification, and the influence of the treatment strategy on end points will be assessed using regression analysis. Primary end points will be all-cause mortality and graft survival. Secondary end points will be worsening of kidney function (≥30% decline of estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate [eGFR] or new-onset large proteinuria), recurrence of graft rejection and treatment response. Baseline data and detailed histopathology data will be entered into an electronic database on enrolment. During a first follow-up period (within 14 days) and subsequent yearly follow-ups (for 5 years), treatment strategies and clinical course will be recorded. Recruitment at the four participating centres started in September 2016. As of August 2020, 495 patients have been included. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for the study has been obtained from the ethics committee of Kiel (AZ B 278/16) and was confirmed by the committees of Munich, Mainz and Stuttgart. The results will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal, according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology criteria. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN78772632; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Grit Esser
- Department of Nephrology & Hypertension, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Kevin Schulte
- Department of Nephrology & Hypertension, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Benedikt Kolbrink
- Department of Nephrology & Hypertension, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Markus Krautter
- Transplant Center, Department of Nephrology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Vedat Schwenger
- Transplant Center, Department of Nephrology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Julia Weinmann-Menke
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Mainz, Department of Internal Medicine I, Mainz, Germany
| | - Julia Matschkal
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, München, Germany
| | - Florian Schraml
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, München, Germany
| | - Anne Pahl
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, München, Germany
| | - Matthias Braunisch
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, München, Germany
| | - Kerstin Amann
- Department of Nephropathology, University Hospital Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thorsten Feldkamp
- Department of Nephrology & Hypertension, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ulrich Kunzendorf
- Department of Nephrology & Hypertension, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Lutz Renders
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, München, Germany
| | - Uwe Heemann
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brook MO, Hester J, Petchey W, Rombach I, Dutton S, Bottomley MJ, Black J, Abdul-Wahab S, Bushell A, Lombardi G, Wood K, Friend P, Harden P, Issa F. Transplantation Without Overimmunosuppression (TWO) study protocol: a phase 2b randomised controlled single-centre trial of regulatory T cell therapy to facilitate immunosuppression reduction in living donor kidney transplant recipients. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061864. [PMID: 35428650 PMCID: PMC9014059 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Regulatory T cell (Treg) therapy has been demonstrated to facilitate long-term allograft survival in preclinical models of transplantation and may permit reduction of immunosuppression and its associated complications in the clinical setting. Phase 1 clinical trials have shown Treg therapy to be safe and feasible in clinical practice. Here we describe a protocol for the TWO study, a phase 2b randomised control trial of Treg therapy in living donor kidney transplant recipients that will confirm safety and explore efficacy of this novel treatment strategy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS 60 patients will be randomised on a 1:1 basis to Treg therapy (TR001) or standard clinical care (control). Patients in the TR001 arm will receive an infusion of autologous polyclonal ex vivo expanded Tregs 5 days after transplantation instead of standard monoclonal antibody induction. Maintenance immunosuppression will be reduced over the course of the post-transplant period to low-dose tacrolimus monotherapy. Control participants will receive a standard basiliximab-based immunosuppression regimen with long-term tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil immunosuppression. The primary endpoint is biopsy proven acute rejection over 18 months; secondary endpoints include immunosuppression burden, chronic graft dysfunction and drug-related complications. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been provided by the National Health Service Health Research Authority South Central-Oxford A Research Ethics Committee (reference 18/SC/0054). The study also received authorisation from the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and is being run in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice, in collaboration with the registered trials unit Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit. Results from the TWO study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific/medical journals and presented at scientific/clinical symposia and congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN: 11038572; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Oliver Brook
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Joanna Hester
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - William Petchey
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Ines Rombach
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Susan Dutton
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew James Bottomley
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Joanna Black
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Seetha Abdul-Wahab
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre GMP unit, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Andrew Bushell
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Giovanna Lombardi
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre GMP unit, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kathryn Wood
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Friend
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Harden
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Fadi Issa
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hayes W, Laing E, Foley C, Pankhurst L, Thomas H, Hume-Smith H, Marks S, Kessaris N, Bryant WA, Spiridou A, Wray J, Peters MJ. Multicentre randomised controlled trial: protocol for Plasma-Lyte Usage and Assessment of Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Children (PLUTO). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e055595. [PMID: 35288387 PMCID: PMC8921856 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Acute electrolyte and acid-base imbalance is experienced by many children following kidney transplantation. When severe, this can lead to complications including seizures, cerebral oedema and death. Relatively large volumes of intravenous fluid are administered to children perioperatively in order to establish perfusion to the donor kidney, the majority of which are from living and deceased adult donors. Hypotonic intravenous fluid is commonly used in the post-transplant period due to clinicians' concerns about the sodium, chloride and potassium content of isotonic alternatives when administered in large volumes.Plasma-Lyte 148 is an isotonic, balanced intravenous fluid that contains sodium, chloride, potassium and magnesium with concentrations equivalent to those of plasma. There is a physiological basis to expect that Plasma-Lyte 148 will reduce the incidence of clinically significant electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities in children following kidney transplantation compared with current practice.The aim of the Plasma-Lyte Usage and Assessment of Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Children (PLUTO) trial was to determine whether the incidence of clinically significantly abnormal plasma electrolyte levels in paediatric kidney transplant recipients will be different with the use of Plasma-Lyte 148 compared with intravenous fluid currently administered. METHODS AND ANALYSIS PLUTO is a pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial comparing Plasma-Lyte 148 to current care in paediatric kidney transplant recipients, conducted in nine UK paediatric kidney transplant centres.A total of 144 children receiving kidney transplants will be randomised to receive either Plasma-Lyte 148 (the intervention) intraoperatively and postoperatively, or current fluid. Apart from intravenous fluid composition, all participants will receive standard clinical transplant care.The primary outcome measure is acute hyponatraemia in the first 72 hours post-transplant, defined as laboratory plasma sodium concentration of <135 mmol/L. Secondary outcomes include symptoms of acute hyponatraemia, other electrolyte and acid-base imbalances and transplant kidney function.The primary outcome will be analysed using a logistic regression model adjusting for donor type (living vs deceased donor), patient weight (<20 kg vs ≥20 kg pretransplant) and transplant centre as a random effect. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial received Health Research Authority approval on 20 January 2020. Findings will be presented to academic groups via national and international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. The patient and public involvement group will play an important part in disseminating the study findings to the public domain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS 2019-003025-22 and 16586164.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley Hayes
- Department of Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emma Laing
- Clinical Trials Unit, NHS Blood and Transplant, Cambridge, UK
| | - Claire Foley
- Clinical Trials Unit, NHS Blood and Transplant, Cambridge, UK
| | - Laura Pankhurst
- Clinical Trials Unit, NHS Blood and Transplant, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen Thomas
- Clinical Trials Unit, NHS Blood and Transplant, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen Hume-Smith
- Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Marks
- Department of Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicos Kessaris
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - William A Bryant
- Digital Research, Informatics and Virtual Environments Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anastassia Spiridou
- Digital Research, Informatics and Virtual Environments Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jo Wray
- Department of Health Psychology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark J Peters
- Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital For Children NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tahir S, Gillott H, Jackson-Spence F, Nath J, Mytton J, Evison F, Sharif A. Do outcomes after kidney transplantation differ for black patients in England versus New York State? A comparative, population-cohort analysis. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e014069. [PMID: 28487457 PMCID: PMC5623361 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Inferior outcomes for black kidney transplant recipients in the USA may not be generalisable elsewhere. In this population cohort analysis, we compared outcomes for black kidney transplant patients in England versus New York State. DESIGN Retrospective, comparative, population cohort study utilising administrative data registries. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS English data were derived from Hospital Episode Statistics, while New York State data were derived from Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. All adults receiving their first kidney-alone allograft between 2003 and 2013 were eligible for inclusion. MEASURES The primary outcome measure was mortality post kidney transplantation (including inhospital death, 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality). Secondary outcome measures included postoperative admission length of stay, risk of rehospitalisation, development of cardiac events, stroke, cancer or fracture and finally transplant rejection/failure. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to investigate relationship between ethnicity, country and outcome. RESULTS Black patients comprised 6.5% of the English cohort (n=1215/18 493) and 23.0% of the New York State cohort (n=2660/11 602). Compared with New York State, black kidney transplant recipients in England were more likely younger, male, living-donor kidney recipients and had dissimilar medical comorbidities. Inpatient mortality was not statistically different, but death within 30 days, 1 year or kidney transplant rejection/failure was lower among black patients in England versus black patients in New York State. In adjusted regression analysis, with black ethnicity the reference group, white patients had reduced risk for 30-day mortality (OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.86)) and 1-year mortality (OR 0.79 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.99)) in New York State but no difference was observed in England. Compared with England, black kidney transplant patients in New York State had increased HR for kidney transplant rejection rejection/failure by median follow-up (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.91 to 2.43). CONCLUSIONS Outcomes after kidney transplantation for black patients may not be translatable between countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanna Tahir
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Holly Gillott
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Jay Nath
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jemma Mytton
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Felicity Evison
- Department of Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Adnan Sharif
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Live kidney donation is generally viewed as a welcome treatment option for severe kidney disease. However, there is a disparity in the body of research on donor experiences and postdonation outcome, and lack of knowledge on long-term consequences described by the donors. This study was conducted to provide insight into donors' subjective meanings and interpretation of their experiences ∼10 years after donation. DESIGN Qualitative explorative in-depth interviews. The sampling strategy employed maximum variation. Setting Oslo University Hospital is the national centre for organ transplantation and donation in Norway, and there are 26 local nephrology centres. PARTICIPANTS 16 donors representing all parts of Norway who donated a kidney in 2001-2004 participated in the study. The interviews were analysed using an interpretative approach. RESULTS The analysis resulted in 4 main themes; the recipient outcome justified long-term experiences, family dynamics-tension still under the surface, ambivalence-healthy versus the need for regular follow-up, and life must go on. These themes reflect the complexity of live kidney donation, which fluctuated from positive experiences such as pride and feeling privileged to adverse experiences such as altered family relationships or reduced health. CONCLUSIONS Live kidney donors seemed to possess resilient qualities that enabled them to address the long-term consequences of donation. The challenge is to provide more uniform information about long-term consequences. In future research, resilient qualities could be a topic to explore in live donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Käthe B Meyer
- Department of Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Annette Lennerling
- Department of Transplantation, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Maiti A, Terracina KA, Das A, Chatterjee S. A tale of two hearts. Postgrad Med J 2016; 93:107. [PMID: 27466412 DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2016] [Revised: 07/04/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Maiti
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Katherine A Terracina
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Avash Das
- Department of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Saurav Chatterjee
- Division of Cardiology, St Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital of the Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bailey PK, Tomson CRV, Ben-Shlomo Y. What factors explain the association between socioeconomic deprivation and reduced likelihood of live-donor kidney transplantation? A questionnaire-based pilot case-control study. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012132. [PMID: 27288388 PMCID: PMC4908905 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Socioeconomically deprived individuals with renal disease are less likely to receive a live-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) than less deprived individuals. This study aimed to develop and pilot a questionnaire designed to determine what factors explain this association. DESIGN Questionnaire development and a pilot case-control study. Primary aims were to develop and evaluate a questionnaire, assess response rates, and to generate data to inform full-scale study design. SETTING A UK tertiary renal referral hospital and transplant centre. PARTICIPANTS Invited participants comprised 30 LDKT recipients (cases) and 30 deceased-donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients (controls). Stratified random sampling was used to select cases and controls from all adults who had been transplanted at Southmead Hospital North Bristol National Health Service Trust, between 1 August 2007 and 31 July 2013. METHODS Participants were posted questionnaires that were accompanied by an invitation letter from the renal consultant responsible for their care, and a patient information leaflet. Non-responders were sent a second questionnaire after 4-6 weeks. Data were extracted from returned questionnaires, and entered onto a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database. RESULTS 63% (n=38) of those invited returned questionnaires. 16 (42%) declined to answer the question on income. 58% of participants had not asked any of their potential donors to consider living kidney donation (52% LDKT vs 65% DDKT, p=0.44). There was some evidence of a difference between the R3K-T knowledge score for recipients of LDKTs (mean 6.7, SD 1.8) and for recipients of DDKTs (mean 4.9, SD 2.1), p=0.008. Variables' distribution for the exposure variables of interest was determined. CONCLUSIONS Findings from this study will inform a sample size calculation for a full-scale study. The findings of the full-scale case-control study will help us better understand how socioeconomic deprivation is related to the type of transplant an individual receives. This understanding will help us to design and appropriately tailor an intervention to reduce inequitable access to live-donor kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillippa K Bailey
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Charles RV Tomson
- Freeman Hospital, 6uu Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Yoav Ben-Shlomo
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cohet C, Haguinet F, Dos Santos G, Webb D, Logie J, LC Ferreira G, Rosillon D, Shinde V. Effect of the adjuvanted (AS03) A/H1N1 2009 pandemic influenza vaccine on the risk of rejection in solid organ transplant recipients in England: a self-controlled case series. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e009264. [PMID: 26823177 PMCID: PMC4735133 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the risk of solid organ transplant (SOT) rejection after vaccination with the adjuvanted (AS03) A/H1N1 2009 pandemic influenza vaccine Pandemrix. DESIGN Self-controlled case series (SCCS) in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and its linked component of the Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) inpatient database. Analyses were conducted using the SCCS method for censored, perturbed or curtailed post-event exposure. PARTICIPANTS Of the 184 transplant recipients having experienced at least one SOT rejection (liver, kidney, lung, heart or pancreas) during the study period from 1 October 2009 to 31 October 2010, 91 participants were included in the main analysis, of which 71 had been exposed to Pandemrix. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Occurrence of SOT rejection during risk (30 and 60 days after any Pandemrix dose) and control periods. Covariates in the CPRD included time since transplantation, seasonal influenza vaccination, bacterial and viral infections, previous SOT rejections and malignancies. RESULTS The relative incidence (RI) of rejection of any one of the five transplanted organs, adjusted for time since transplantation, was 1.05 (95% CI 0.52 to 2.14) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.42 to 1.50) within 30 and 60 days after vaccination, respectively. Similar estimates were observed for rejection of a kidney only, the most commonly transplanted organ (RI within 30 days after vaccination: 0.85 (95% CI 0.38 to 1.90)). Across various models and sensitivity analyses, RI estimates remained stable and within a consistent range around 1.0. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest a reassuring safety profile for Pandemrix with regard to the risk of rejection in SOT recipients in England and contribute to inform the benefit-risk of AS03-adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccines in transplanted patients in the event of future pandemics. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01715792.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gaël Dos Santos
- Business & Decision Life Sciences, Brussels, Belgium (on behalf of GSK Vaccines)
| | - Dave Webb
- Department of R&D, GSK, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
| | - John Logie
- Department of R&D, GSK, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
| | | | | | - Vivek Shinde
- Global Epidemiology, GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Howell M, Wong G, Rose J, Tong A, Craig JC, Howard K. Eliciting patient preferences, priorities and trade-offs for outcomes following kidney transplantation: a pilot best-worst scaling survey. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e008163. [PMID: 26810994 PMCID: PMC4735165 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Eliciting preferences and trade-offs that patients may make to achieve important outcomes, can assist in developing patient-centred research and care. The pilot study aimed to test the feasibility of a case 2 best-worst scaling survey (BWS) to elicit recipient with kidney transplantation preferences after transplantation. DESIGN Preferences for graft survival and dying, cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, infection and side effects (gastrointestinal, weight-gain and appearance) were assessed in recipients with transplantation using a BWS (20 scenarios of nine outcomes). Participants chose 'best' and 'worst' outcomes. Responses were analysed using a multinomial logit model. Selected participants were interviewed. OUTCOMES Attribute coefficients and survey completion error rates. RESULTS 81 recipients with transplantation were approached, and 39 (48%), mean age 50.5 years, completed the BWS. 4 (10%) surveys were invalid with major errors and of 35 remaining, 7 of 1400 (0.5%) choices were missing. -23 (59%) took >20 min to complete the survey. 1 was unable to finish, and 1 did not understand the survey. 2 (5%) found it very hard and 14 (35%) moderately hard. Most attribute coefficients were significant (p<0.05) and showed face validity. Graft survival was most important with normalised coefficients from 1 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.11) to 0.06 (95% CI -0.03 to 0.16) for 30 and 1 year duration, respectively. Attribute level coefficients decreased with increasing risk of adverse outcomes. Error rates of 20% and 2% were estimated for dominant attributes '100% risk of dying' and '30 years graft survival', respectively. 7 participants were interviewed regarding counterintuitive selection of '100% risk of dying' as a 'best' outcome. Misunderstanding, not linking dying to graft survival and aversion to dialysis were reasons given. CONCLUSIONS Recipients with transplant recipients successfully completed a complex case 2 BWS with attribute coefficients having face validity with respect to duration of graft survival and risk of adverse outcomes. Areas for refinement to reduce complexity in design have been identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Howell
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Rose
- Institute for Choice, University of South Australia Business School, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten Howard
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ralph AF, Alyami A, Allen RDM, Howard K, Craig JC, Chadban SJ, Irving M, Tong A. Attitudes and beliefs about deceased organ donation in the Arabic-speaking community in Australia: a focus group study. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e010138. [PMID: 26787253 PMCID: PMC4735320 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the beliefs and attitudes to organ donation in the Arabic-speaking community. DESIGN Arabic-speaking participants were purposively recruited to participate in 6 focus groups. Transcripts were analysed thematically. PARTICIPANTS 53 participants, aged 19-77 years, and originating from 8 countries, participated in 1 of 6 focus groups. Participants identified as Christian (73%), Islam (26%), Buddhist (2%) or did not identify with any religion (2%). RESULTS 6 themes (with subthemes) were identified; religious conviction; invisibility of organ donation; medical suspicion; owning the decision; and reciprocal benefit. CONCLUSIONS Although organ donation is considered a generous life-saving 'gift', representative members of the Arabic-speaking community in Australia were unfamiliar with, unnerved by and sceptical about the donation process. Making positive decisions about organ donation would likely require resolving tensions between respecting family, community and religious values versus their individual autonomy. Providing targeted education about the process and benefits of organ donation within the Arabic community may clarify ambiguities surrounding cultural and religious-based views on organ donation, reduce taboos and suspicion towards donation, and in turn, lead to increased organ donation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelique F Ralph
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ali Alyami
- Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia Transplantation Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard D M Allen
- Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia Transplantation Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten Howard
- The Institute for Choice, University of South Australia, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steve J Chadban
- Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia Transplantation Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Irving
- Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hu Z, Zhang Q, Zhou J, Li Z, Xiang J, Zhou L, Wu J, Zhang M, Zheng S. Impact of multiple liver resections prior to salvage liver transplantation on survival in patients with recurrent HCC. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e008429. [PMID: 26353871 PMCID: PMC4567684 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Salvage liver transplantation (SLT) is a controversial technique that has been reported to be acceptable for the management of patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after primary hepatic resection (HR). However, whether the number of times liver resection is performed has an impact on survival after SLT has not yet been reported. DESIGN Retrospective study. SETTING The level of care is primary and the study was carried out at only 1 centre. PARTICIPANTS The study included 59 patients who underwent SLT for HCC from September 2001 to December 2012. 51 patients underwent HR only once before SLT, while the remaining 8 patients underwent HR more than once before SLT (HR=2 [7], HR=3, [1]). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES In this study, the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall and tumour-free survival outcomes between the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS There were no significant differences between patients who underwent HR once and those who underwent HR more than once with respect to overall or tumour-free survival after receiving SLT. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates for patients who underwent HR once were 72.9%, 35.3% and 35.5% vs 50%, 50% and 50%, respectively (p=0.986), while the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year tumour-free survival rates for those who underwent HR more than once were 66.3%, 55.3% and 44.4% vs 40%, 40% and 40%, respectively (p=0.790). CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in the survival rate of patients who underwent HR once before SLT and those who underwent HR more than once. This suggests that SLT is a reasonable choice for patients who suffer from recurrent HCC after HR. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This is a retrospective study and no registry or number is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenhua Hu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qijun Zhang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jie Zhou
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhiwei Li
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jie Xiang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lin Zhou
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jian Wu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Min Zhang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Shusen Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
There are two forms of transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis: non-hereditary and hereditary. The non-hereditary form (ATTRwt) is caused by native or wild-type TTR and was previously referred to as senile systemic amyloidosis. The hereditary form (ATTRm) is caused by variant TTR which results from a genetic mutation of TTR. The predominant effect of ATTRwt amyloidosis is on the heart, with patients having a greater left ventricular wall thickness at presentation than the devastating form which is light chain (AL) amyloidosis. ATTRm amyloidosis is broadly split into two categories: a type that predominantly affects the nervous system (often called familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP)) and one with a predilection for the heart (often called familial amyloid cardiomyopathy (FAC)). Approximately half of all TTR mutations known to express a clinical phenotype cause a cardiomyopathy. Since the introduction of orthotopic liver transplantation for ATTRm amyloidosis in 1991, several additional therapies have been developed. These therapies aim to provide a reduction or elimination of TTR from the plasma (through genetic approaches), stabilisation of the TTR molecule (to prevent deposition) and dissolution of the amyloid matrix. We describe the latest developments in these approaches to management, many of which are also applicable to wild-type amyloidosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Dubrey
- Department of Cardiology, Hillingdon & Mount Vernon Hospitals NHS Trust, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
| | | | - Julian Gillmore
- Division of Medicine, National Amyloidosis Centre, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ren J, Li X, Sun J, Han M, Yang GY, Li WY, Robinson N, Lewith G, Liu JP. Is traditional Chinese medicine recommended in Western medicine clinical practice guidelines in China? A systematic analysis. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e006572. [PMID: 26041487 PMCID: PMC4458581 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2014] [Revised: 03/26/2015] [Accepted: 04/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based medicine promotes and relies on the use of evidence in developing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). The Chinese healthcare system includes both traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Western medicine, which are expected to be equally reflected in Chinese CPGs. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the inclusion of TCM-related information in Western medicine CPGs developed in China and the adoption of high level evidence. METHODS All CPGs were identified from the China Guideline Clearinghouse (CGC), which is the main Chinese organisation maintaining the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Health of China, the Chinese Medical Association and the Chinese Medical Doctors' Association.TCM-related contents were extracted from all the CPGs identified. Extracted information comprised the institution issuing the guideline, date of issue, disease, recommendations relating to TCM, evidence level of the recommended content and references supporting the recommendations. RESULTS A total of 604 CPGs were identified, only a small number of which (74/604; 12%) recommended TCM therapy and only five guidelines (7%) had applied evidence grading. The 74 CPGs involved 13 disease systems according to the International Classification of Diseases 10th edition. TCM was mainly recommended in the treatment part of the guidelines (73/74, 99%), and more than half of the recommendations (43/74, 58%) were related to Chinese herbal medicine (single herbs or herbal treatment based on syndrome differentiation). CONCLUSIONS Few Chinese Western medicine CPGs recommend TCM therapies and very few provide evidence grading for the TCM recommendation. We suggest that future guideline development should be based on systematic searches for evidence to support CPG recommendations and involve a multidisciplinary approach including TCM expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Ren
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xun Li
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Sun
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Mei Han
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Guo-Yan Yang
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Wen-Yuan Li
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Nicola Robinson
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - George Lewith
- Complementary and Integrated Medicine Research Unit, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Southampton University, Southampton, UK
| | - Jian-Ping Liu
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- NAFKAM, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tovikkai C, Charman SC, Praseedom RK, Gimson AE, van der Meulen J. Time-varying impact of comorbidities on mortality after liver transplantation: a national cohort study using linked clinical and administrative data. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e006971. [PMID: 25976762 PMCID: PMC4442248 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We assessed the impact of comorbidity on mortality in three periods after liver transplantation (first 90 days, 90 days-5 years and 5-10 years). DESIGN Prospective cohort study using records from the UK Liver Transplant Audit (UKLTA) linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), an administrative database of hospital admissions in the English National Health Service (NHS). Comorbidities relevant for liver transplantation were identified from the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes in HES records of admissions in the year preceding their operation. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate HRs for three different time periods after liver transplantation. SETTING All liver transplant centres in the NHS hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS Adults who received a first elective liver transplant between April 1997 and March 2010 in the linked UKLTA-HES database. OUTCOMES Patient mortality in three different time periods after transplantation. RESULTS Among 3837 recipients, 45.1% had comorbidities. Recipients with cardiovascular disease had statistically significantly higher mortality in all three periods after transplantation (first 90 days: HR=2.0; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.9, 90 days-5 years: 1.6; 1.2 to 2.2, beyond 5 years: 2.8; 1.7 to 4.4). Prior congestive cardiac failure (3.2; 2.1 to 4.9) significantly increased mortality only in the first 90 days. History of non-hepatic malignancy appeared to increase risk over all periods, but significantly only in the first 90 days (1.9; 1.0 to 3.6). A diagnosis of connective tissue disease, dementia, diabetes, chronic pulmonary and renal disease did not have a significant impact on mortality in any period. CONCLUSIONS The impact of comorbidities present at the time of transplantation changes with time after transplantation. Renal disease, pulmonary disease and diabetes had no impact on mortality in contrast to previous reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chutwichai Tovikkai
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Susan C Charman
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Raaj K Praseedom
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Liver Transplant Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alexander E Gimson
- Liver Transplant Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Acquired severe aplastic anaemia is a rare and potentially fatal disease. The aim of this Cochrane review was to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse events of first-line allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation of human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors compared with first-line immunosuppressive therapy. SETTING Specialised stem cell transplantations units in primary care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS We included 302 participants with newly diagnosed acquired severe aplastic anaemia. The age ranged from early childhood to young adulthood. We excluded studies on participants with secondary aplastic anaemia. INTERVENTIONS We included allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation as the test intervention harvested from any source of matched sibling donor and serving as a first-line therapy. We included immunosuppressive therapy as comparator with either antithymocyte/antilymphocyte globulin or ciclosporin or a combination of the two. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES PLANNED AND FINALLY MEASURED: The primary outcome was overall mortality. Secondary outcomes were treatment-related mortality, graft failure, graft-versus-host disease, no response to immunosuppressive therapy, relapse after initial successful treatment, secondary clonal disease or malignancies, health-related quality of life and performance scores. RESULTS We identified three prospective non-randomised controlled trials with a study design that was consistent with the principle of 'Mendelian randomisation' in allocating patients to treatment groups. All studies had a high risk of bias due to the study design and were conducted more than 15 years. The pooled HR for overall mortality for the donor group versus the no donor group was 0.95 (95% CI 0.43 to 2.12, p=0.90). CONCLUSIONS There are insufficient and biased data that do not allow any firm conclusions to be made about the comparative effectiveness of first-line allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation of HLA-matched sibling donors and first-line immunosuppressive therapy of patients with acquired severe aplastic anaemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Peinemann
- Children's Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|