Strategy for net-zero carbon surgery

Transitioning to Office-based Transperineal Prostate Biopsy-A Case Study From a Regional New Zealand Hospital in Economic and Environmental Sustainability

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effects of the transition to office-based transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPB) on the interconnected domains of profit, planet, and people. Sustainability, encompassing environmental, social, and economic dimensions, is increasingly significant in health care. Urology, as a surgical specialty, presents unique opportunities to implement sustainable practices. This article outlines a case study detailing the transition of TPPB from the operating theater to an office-based setting.

METHODS

This study utilized a multi-phase approach, integrating retrospective and prospective data analyses. Changes in clinical workflows, financial savings, environmental impacts, and accessibility to care were assessed. Life cycle analysis evaluated carbon emissions associated with TPPB, while clinical outcomes, including infection rates and procedural efficiency, were monitored. Patient satisfaction and equity in health care access were explored through geographic accessibility studies and procedural adaptations.

RESULTS

Transitioning TPPB to an office-based setting resulted in: 1. Profit: Annual cost reductions of $302,000 NZD, increased procedural capacity, and elimination of hospital admissions due to transrectal ultrasound-guided-related sepsis. 2. Planet: Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions to 70 kgCO2e per biopsy, with significant contributions from reusable equipment packs and virtual consultations. 3. People: Enhanced patient comfort through fewer biopsy cores, reduced health care worker burden, and improved access for Māori populations via proposed mobile biopsy units.

CONCLUSION

This case study underscores the potential for sustainable innovations in urology to achieve cost-effective, environmentally responsible, and socially equitable health care delivery. It serves as a model for integrating sustainability into clinical practice, reinforcing the need for data-driven decision-making and collaborative leadership in the medical field.

Improving sustainability and mitigating the environmental impact of anaesthesia and surgery along the perioperative journey: a narrative review

Climate change, environmental degradation, and biodiversity loss are adversely affecting human health and exacerbating existing inequities, intensifying pressures on already strained health systems. Paradoxically, healthcare is a high-polluting industry, responsible for 4.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions and a similar proportion of air pollutants. Perioperative services are among the most resource-intensive healthcare services and are responsible for some unique pollutants. Opportunities exist to mitigate pollution throughout the entire continuum of perioperative care, including those that occur upstream of the operating room in the process of patient selection and optimisation, delivery of anaesthesia and surgery, and the postoperative recovery period. Within a patient-centred, holistic approach, clinicians can advocate for healthy public policies that modify the determinants of surgical illness, can engage in shared decision-making to ensure appropriate clinical decisions, and can be stewards of healthcare resources. Innovation and collaboration are required to redesign clinical care pathways and processes, optimise logistical systems, and address facility emissions. The results will extend beyond the reduction of public health damages from healthcare pollution to the provision of higher value, higher quality, patient-centred care.

Implementation approaches to improve environmental sustainability in operating theatres: a systematic review

Operating theatres consume large amounts of energy and consumables and produce large amounts of waste. There is an increasing evidence base for reducing the climate impacts of healthcare that could be enacted into routine practice; yet, healthcare-associated emissions increase annually. Implementation science aims to improve the systematic uptake of evidence-based care into practice and could, therefore, assist in addressing the environmental impacts of healthcare. The aim of this systematic search with narrative synthesis was to explore what implementation approaches have been applied to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatre activities, described by implementation phases and methodologies. A search was conducted in EMBASE, PubMed, and CINAHL, limited to English and publication since 2010. In total, 3886 articles were retrieved and 11 were included. All were in the exploratory phase (seven of 11) or initial implementation phase (four of 11), but none were in the installation or full implementation phase. Three studies utilised a recognised implementation theory, model, or framework in the design. Four studies used interprofessional education to influence individuals' behaviour to reduce waste, improve waste segregation, or reduce anaesthetic gases. Of those that utilised behaviour change interventions, all were qualitatively successful in achieving environmental improvement. There was an absence of evidence for sustained effects in the intervention studies and little follow-up from studies that explored barriers to innovation. This review demonstrates a gap between evidence for reducing environmental impacts and uptake of proposed practice changes to deliver low-carbon healthcare. Future research into 'greening' healthcare should use implementation research methods to establish a solid implementation evidence base. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO CRD42022342786.

The United European Gastroenterology green paper-climate change and gastroenterology

Climate change, described by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2021 as 'the single biggest health threat facing humanity', causes extreme weather, disrupts food supplies, and increases the prevalence of diseases, thereby affecting human health, medical practice, and healthcare stability. Greener Gastroenterology is an important movement that has the potential to make a real difference in reducing the impact of the delivery of healthcare, on the environment. The WHO defines an environmentally sustainable health system as one which would improve, maintain or restore health while minimizing negative environmental impacts. Gastroenterologists encounter the impacts of climate change in daily patient care. Alterations in the gut microbiome and dietary habits, air pollution, heat waves, and the distribution of infectious diseases result in changed disease patterns affecting gastrointestinal and hepatic health, with particularly severe impacts on vulnerable groups such as children, adolescents, and the elderly. Additionally, women are disproportionally affected, since climate change can exacerbate gender inequalities. Paradoxically, while healthcare aims to improve health, the sector is responsible for 4.4% of global carbon emissions. Endoscopy is a significant waste producer in healthcare, being the third highest generator with 3.09 kg of waste per day per bed, contributing to the carbon footprint of the GI sector. Solutions to the climate crisis can offer significant health co-benefits. Steps to reduce our carbon footprint include fostering a Planetary Health Diet and implementing measures for greener healthcare, such as telemedicine, digitalization, education, and research on sustainable healthcare practices. Adhering to the principles of 'reduce, reuse, recycle' is crucial. Reducing unnecessary procedures, which constitute a significant portion of endoscopies, can significantly decrease the carbon footprint and enhance sustainability. This position paper by the United European Gastroenterology aims to raise awareness and outline key principles that the GI workforce can adopt to tackle the climate crisis together.

Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of a U.S. Hospital-based Radiology Practice

Background Climate change, driven primarily by human-induced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, poses major risks to human health. Health care contributes 8.5% of GHG emissions in the United States. Purpose To estimate the life cycle environmental impact of diagnostic radiology services within a single academic medical center. Materials and Methods This process-based life cycle assessment (LCA) of a diagnostic radiology department serving adult inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department patients in a U.S. hospital followed International Organization for Standardization (ISO 14040:2006) guidelines. System components included production and distribution of imaging equipment; energy use of imaging equipment, including MRI, CT, radiography and fluoroscopy, and US; production and use of other capital equipment; production of single-use, semidurable, and durable supplies and linens; and production and energy use from onsite data storage. Meters monitored the power usage of selected imaging equipment during April 2023. Modeling assumed an equipment lifespan of 10 years. Results are reported in kilotons of CO2 equivalent (kt CO2e) emissions per scan and over a 10-year period. A sensitivity analysis assessed variability of data. Results Over a decade, these radiology services generated 4.6 kt CO2e GHG emissions, with MRI responsible for 48% (2.2 of 4.6 kt CO2e) and CT responsible for 24% (1.1 of 4.6 kt CO2e) of cumulative emissions. Clinical use of imaging equipment (all modalities) accounted for 54% of departmental GHGs (2.5 of 4.6 kt CO2e). Other notable contributions include the production of imaging equipment (11%, 0.49 of 4.6 kt CO2e), the production and use of picture archiving and communication system workstations (11%, 0.48 of 4.6 kt CO2e), and linens production and laundering (10%, 0.47 of 4.6 kt CO2e). Conclusion Energy consumption from clinical use of imaging equipment accounted for more than 50% of departmental GHG emissions, with MRI and CT equipment as the major emitters. Other notable GHG contributors include the production of imaging equipment, the production and use of picture archiving and communication system workstations, and linens production and laundering. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Thrall in this issue.

Estimation of carbon emissions associated with tibial plateau levelling osteotomies in 10 dogs

OBJECTIVE

To describe a method of estimating the carbon emissions resulting from 10 clinical canine surgical procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study.

ANIMALS

A total of 10 adult client-owned dogs presenting to two private referral centres in the UK for tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) using either isoflurane or sevoflurane for maintenance of anaesthesia.

METHODS

Single-use consumables, pharmaceuticals and waste streams were recorded. Volatile anaesthetic use was calculated based on fresh gas flow (FGF) and vaporizer setting. Travel of owners and staff involved in the procedure was recorded (the latter adjusted by procedure length relative to working day). Energy use was calculated based on the clinics monthly usage adjusted for floor area of rooms used. Overnight hospitalisation, kennelling consumables and a revisit for postoperative radiography were excluded. Carbon accounting was performed using published carbon conversion factors ('bottom-up analysis') if available, or conversion factors based on cost ('top-down'). Data are presented as median (range) and totals per emission category.

RESULTS

Carbon emissions from all cases amounted to 667.2 kgCO2e. In these two clinics, median carbon emissions from a canine TPLO were 63.5 (47.6-93) kgCO2e, which is equivalent to driving 372 km (231 miles) in an average UK passenger car. Travel accounted for 30.1% of carbon emissions. Volatile anaesthetics accounted for 21.4% of carbon emissions, with other pharmaceuticals accounting for 24.0%. Consumables, building energy and waste disposal accounted for 19.7%, 3.9% and 0.9% of carbon emissions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Likely carbon hotspots for canine orthopaedic procedures include travel and pharmaceuticals, particularly volatile anaesthetic agents. Carbon reductions should focus on reducing travel emissions, streamlining pharmaceutical use and lower-carbon anaesthetic techniques. Future research should focus on improving carbon accounting methodology and widening the range of cases assessed.

Fostering innovation and sustainable thinking in surgery: an evaluation of a surgical hackathon

INTRODUCTION

Surgery represents a major source of carbon emissions, with numerous initiatives promoting more sustainable practices. Healthcare innovation and the development of a digitally capable workforce are fundamental in leveraging technologies to tackle challenges, including sustainability in surgery.

METHODS

A surgical hackathon was organised with three major themes: (1) how to make surgery greener, (2) the future of plastic surgery in 10 years, and (3) improving healthcare outcomes using machine learning. Lectures were given on sustainability and innovation using the problem, innovation, market size, strategy and team (PIMST) framework to support their presentations, as well as technological support to translate ideas into simulations or minimum viable products. Pre- and post-event questionnaires were circulated to participants.

RESULTS

Most attendees were medical students (65%), although doctors and engineers were also present. There was a significant increase in delegates' confidence in approaching innovation in surgery (+20%, p < 0.001). Reducing waste packaging (70%), promoting recyclable material usage (56%) and the social media dimension of public perceptions towards plastic surgery (40%) were reported as the most important issues arising from the hackathon. The top three prizes went to initiatives promoting an artificial intelligence-enhanced operative pathway, instrument sterilisation and an educational platform to teach students research and innovation skills.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical hackathons can result in significant improvements in confidence in approaching innovation, as well as raising awareness of important healthcare challenges. Future innovation events may build on this to continue to empower the future workforce to leverage technologies to tackle healthcare challenges such as sustainability.

Environmental impact of hybrid (reusable/single-use) ports versus single-use equivalents in robotic surgery

Given the rise in robotic surgery, and parallel movement towards net zero carbon, sustainable healthcare systems, it is important that the environmental impact of robotic approaches is minimised. The majority of greenhouse gas emissions associated with robotic surgery have previously been associated with single-use items. Whilst switching from single-use products to hybrid equivalents (predominantly reusable, with a small single-use component) has previously been found to reduce the environmental impact of a range of products used for laparoscopic surgery, the generalisability of this to robotic surgery has not previously been demonstrated. In this life cycle assessment, use of hybrid 5 mm ports compatible with emerging robotic systems (143 g CO2e) was found to reduce the carbon footprint by 83% compared with using single-use equivalents (816 g CO2e), accompanied by reductions in fifteen out of eighteen midpoint environmental impact categories. For endpoint categories, there was an 81% reduction in impact on human health and species loss, and 82% reductions in resource depletion associated with using hybrid robotic 5 mm ports. Whilst the carbon footprint of 5 mm hybrid ports compatible with emerging robotic equipment was 70% higher than previous estimates of ports appropriate for conventional laparoscopic approaches, the six-fold reductions seen with hybrids in this analysis point to the generalisability of the finding that reusable or hybrid products have a lower carbon footprint when compared with single-use equivalents. Surgeons, procurement teams, and policy makers should encourage innovation towards clinically safe and effective robotic instruments with maximal reusable components.

A long road ahead. A German national survey study on awareness and willingness of surgeons towards the carbon footprint of modern surgical procedures

Background

Climate change may well be the "largest threat" to humankind. Changes to our climate system lead to a decrease in global health. The healthcare sector presents one of the largest carbon footprints across all industries. Since surgical departments have one of the largest carbon footprints within the healthcare sector, they represent an area with vast opportunities for improvement. To drive change, it is vital to create awareness of these issues and encourage engagement in changes among people working in the healthcare industry.

Methods

We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional survey study to assess awareness among surgeons regarding the impact of healthcare systems on climate change. The questions were designed to investigate surgeons' willingness to accept and promote changes to reduce carbon footprints. Participants included surgical professionals of all ages and levels of expertise.

Results

A total of 210 participants completed the survey in full and were included in the evaluation. Sixty percent emphasized a lack of information and the need for personal education. Over 90 % expressed concern for the environment and a strong desire to gain new insights. Provided that clinical performance remains the same, more than 70 % are willing to embrace carbon-friendly alternatives. In this context, all participants accepted the additional time required for training and initially increased personal efforts to achieve equal performance.

Conclusion

Limited awareness and information about carbon footprints were observed in surgical departments in German hospitals. Nevertheless, the vast majority of surgeons across all age groups are more than willing to acquire new insights and adapt to changes in order to reduce energy consumption and carbon dioxide production.

Sustainability and Green Practices in the Neurosurgical Operating Room: A Scoping Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The healthcare sector is a significant contributor to worldwide greenhouse gas emissions. The specific environmental impacts of neurosurgical operations remain largely unexplored.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and review existing literature on sustainability and environmental impacts in the neurosurgical operating room, with an aim to assess scope and scale, and secondarily to evaluate potential interventions pertinent to neurosurgery.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, and Scopus were searched for English-language articles published through July 2023 topically related to operating room sustainability practices and environmental impacts, with attention paid to neurosurgery.

RESULTS

A primary search identified 5 articles that specifically addressed sustainability issues within neurosurgery; 3 were observational studies, 1 was retrospective, and 1 was a prospective study. A further 12 studies (4 observational, 4 systematic reviews, 3 prospective, 1 a survey on barriers to practice adoption) were evaluated to access the broader scope of environmental impacts of surgery that may be relatable to neurosurgery. Key reviewed subdomains included resource conservation, waste production, and carbon footprinting.

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of literature on sustainability practices within the field of neurosurgery. Here we identify the available evidence on the environmental impact of neurosurgical care and describe some avenues to reduce this impact by exploring surgical sustainability literature more broadly.

Time for change: compliance with RCS green theatre checklist-facilitators and barriers on the journey to net zero

Background

Climate change is an era-defining health concern, with healthcare related emissions paradoxically compounding negative impacts. The NHS produces 5% of the UK's carbon footprint, with operating theatres a recognised carbon hotspot. NHS England aims to become Net Zero by 2045. Consequently, UK Royal Colleges of Surgery have published guidance to foster an evidence-based sustainable transformation in surgical practice.

Methods

A single-centre quality improvement project was undertaken, aiming to provide an overview of sustainable practice locally. The Intercollegiate "Green Theatre Checklist" was taken as an audit standard, focusing on "preparing for surgery" and "intraoperative equipment" subsections. Any general surgical procedure was eligible for inclusion. Usage of reusable textiles, non-sterile gloves, catheters, antibiotics, alcohol vs. water-based scrub techniques, skin sterilisation choices, and skin closure materials were recorded. Baseline data collection occurred over a 3 week period, followed by dissemination of results locally via clinical governance meetings and poster displays. A re-audit of practice was conducted using the same methodology and duration.

Results

Datasets 1 (n = 23) and 2 (n = 23) included open (n = 22), laparoscopic (n = 24), elective (n = 22) and non-elective (n = 24) cases. Good practice was demonstrated in reusable textiles (trolley covers 96%, 78%, drapes 100%, 92%) however procurement issues reduced otherwise good reusable gown use in Dataset 2 in (90%, 46%). No unnecessary catheter use was identified, and loose skin preparations were used unanimously. Uptake of alcohol-based scrubbing techniques was low (15%, 17%) and unnecessary non-sterile glove use was observed in >30% of procedures. All laparoscopic ports and scissors were single use. Carbon footprints were 128.27 kgCO2e and 117.71 kgCO2e in datasets 1 and 2 respectively.

Conclusion

This project evidences good practice alongside future local focus areas for improved sustainability. Adoption of hybrid laparoscopic instruments, avoiding unnecessary equipment opening, and standardising reusable materials could reduce carbon and environmental impact considerably. Successful implementation requires considered procurement practices, improved awareness and education, clear leadership, and a sustained cultural shift within the healthcare community. Collaboration among professional institutions and access to supporting evidence is crucial in driving engagement and empowering clinicians to make locally relevant changes a reality.

Clinical utility of colon capsule endoscopy: a moving target?

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of white light colon capsule endoscopy's current clinical application, concentrating on its most recent developments. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy (CCE2) is approved by the FDA for use as an adjunctive test in patients with incomplete colonoscopy and within Europe in patients at average risk, those with incomplete colonoscopies or those unwilling to undergo conventional colonoscopies. Since the publication of European Society of GI Endoscopy guidelines on the use of CCE, there has been a significant increase in comparative studies on the diagnostic yield of CCE. This paper discusses CCE2 in further detail. It explains newly developed colon capsule system and the current status on the use of CCE, it also provides a comprehensive summary of systematic reviews on the implementation of CCE in colorectal cancer screening from a methodological perspective. Patients with ulcerative colitis can benefit from CCE2 in terms of assessing mucosal inflammation. As part of this review, performance of CCE2 for assessing disease severity in ulcerative colitis is compared with colonoscopy. Finally, an assessment if CCE can become a cost-effective clinical service overall.

The carbon footprint of products used in five common surgical operations: identifying contributing products and processes

OBJECTIVES

Mitigating carbon footprint of products used in resource-intensive areas such as surgical operating rooms will be important in achieving net zero carbon healthcare. The aim of this study was to evaluate the carbon footprint of products used within five common operations, and to identify the biggest contributors (hotspots).

DESIGN

A predominantly process-based carbon footprint analysis was conducted for products used in the five highest volume surgical operations performed in the National Health System in England.

SETTING

The carbon footprint inventory was based on direct observation of 6-10 operations/type, conducted across three sites within one NHS Foundation Trust in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing primary elective carpal tunnel decompression, inguinal hernia repair, knee arthroplasty, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, tonsillectomy (March 2019 - January 2020).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We determined the carbon footprint of the products used in each of the five operations, alongside greatest contributors through analysis of individual products and of underpinning processes.

RESULTS

The mean average carbon footprint of products used for carpal tunnel decompression was 12.0 kg CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalents); 11.7 kg CO2e for inguinal hernia repair; 85.5 kg CO2e for knee arthroplasty; 20.3 kg CO2e for laparoscopic cholecystectomy; and 7.5 kg CO2e for tonsillectomy. Across the five operations, 23% of product types were responsible for ≥80% of the operation carbon footprint. Products with greatest carbon contribution for each operation type were the single-use hand drape (carpal tunnel decompression), single-use surgical gown (inguinal hernia repair), bone cement mix (knee arthroplasty), single-use clip applier (laparoscopic cholecystectomy) and single-use table drape (tonsillectomy). Mean average contribution from production of single-use items was 54%, decontamination of reusables 20%, waste disposal of single-use items 8%, production of packaging for single-use items 6% and linen laundering 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Change in practice and policy should be targeted towards those products making greatest contribution, and should include reducing single-use items and switching to reusables, alongside optimising processes for decontamination and waste disposal, modelled to reduce carbon footprint of these operations by 23%-42%.

Environmental effects of surgical procedures and strategies for sustainable surgery

There is a bidirectional relationship between climate change and health care. Climate change threatens public health, and health care contributes to climate change. For example, surgery is the most energy-intensive practice in the health-care sector, and gastrointestinal conditions are responsible for a substantial environmental burden. However, environmental costs associated with health care are often overlooked. This issue has been examined more closely in current times. Emerging data are mainly focused on surgery, as the most resource-intensive practice. However, there is still a lack of global awareness and guidance on sustainable surgical practices. This Perspective aims to reassess the evidence on health care and surgery carbon footprints, focusing on gastrointestinal conditions, identify issues that need to be addressed to achieve a more sustainable practice and develop perspectives for future surgical procedures. The proposed framework to mitigate the environmental effects of surgery could be translated to other health-care sectors.

The Environmental Footprint of Neurosurgery Operations: An Assessment of Waste Streams and the Carbon Footprint

Healthcare in England generates 24.9 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO₂e), equating to approximately 4% of the total national output of greenhouse gases (GHG), and of this, 10% is from the manufacturing of medical equipment. Operating theatres are a major contributor of biomedical waste, especially consumables, and are three-to-six times more energy intensive than the rest of the hospital. This study seeks to quantify and evaluate the carbon cost, or footprint, of neurosurgery at a single institution in England. A single neurosurgical operation generates, on average, 8.91 kg of waste per case, equivalent to 24.5 CO₂e kg per case, mostly from single-use equipment. Per annum, 1300 neurosurgical operative cases are performed with total waste generation of 11,584.4 kg/year and a carbon footprint of 31,859 (kg) CO₂e. The challenge of achieving net zero GHG presents an opportunity to catalyse innovation and sustainability in neurosurgery, from how care is delivered, through to equipment use and surgical methodologies. This should improve the quality of healthcare provision to patients and yield potential cost savings.

Minimising carbon and financial costs of steam sterilisation and packaging of reusable surgical instruments

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to estimate the carbon footprint and financial cost of decontaminating (steam sterilization) and packaging reusable surgical instruments, indicating how that burden might be reduced, enabling surgeons to drive action towards net-zero-carbon surgery.

METHODS

Carbon footprints were estimated using activity data and prospective machine-loading audit data at a typical UK in-hospital sterilization unit, with instruments wrapped individually in flexible pouches, or prepared as sets housed in single-use tray wraps or reusable rigid containers. Modelling was used to determine the impact of alternative machine loading, opening instruments during the operation, streamlining sets, use of alternative energy sources for decontamination, and alternative waste streams.

RESULTS

The carbon footprint of decontaminating and packaging instruments was lowest when instruments were part of sets (66-77 g CO2e per instrument), with a two- to three-fold increase when instruments were wrapped individually (189 g CO2e per instrument). Where 10 or fewer instruments were required for the operation, obtaining individually wrapped items was preferable to opening another set. The carbon footprint was determined significantly by machine loading and the number of instruments per machine slot. Carbon and financial costs increased with streamlining sets. High-temperature incineration of waste increased the carbon footprint of single-use packaging by 33-55 per cent, whereas recycling reduced this by 6-10 per cent. The absolute carbon footprint was dependent on the energy source used, but this did not alter the optimal processes to minimize that footprint.

CONCLUSION

Carbon and financial savings can be made by preparing instruments as part of sets, integrating individually wrapped instruments into sets rather than streamlining them, efficient machine loading, and using low-carbon energy sources alongside recycling.