Implementation and validation of a novel instrument for the grading of unexpected events in paediatric surgery: Clavien-Madadi classification

Validation of the Clavien-Madadi Classification for Unexpected Events in Pediatric Surgery: A Collaborative ERNICA Project

BACKGROUND

The Clavien-Madadi classification is a novel instrument for the assessment and grading of unexpected events in pediatric surgery, based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. The system has been adjusted to better fit the pediatric population in a prospective single-center study. There is a need now to validate the Clavien-Madadi classification within an international expert network.

METHODS

A pediatric surgical working group created 19 case scenarios with unexpected events in a multi-staged process. Those were circulated within the European Reference Network of Inherited and Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) and surgeons were instructed to rate the scenarios according to the Clavien-Madadi vs. Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

59 surgeons from 12 European countries completed the questionnaire. Based on ratings of the case scenarios, the Clavien-Madadi classification showed significantly superior agreement rates of the respondents (85.9% vs 76.2%; p < 0.05) and was less frequently considered inaccurate for rating the pediatric population compared to Clavien-Dindo (2.1% vs 11.1%; p = 0.05). Fleiss' kappa analysis showed slightly higher strength of agreement using the Clavien-Madadi classification (0.74 vs 0.69). Additionally, intraclass correlation coefficient was slightly higher for the Clavien-Madadi compared to the Clavien-Dindo classification (ICCjust 0.93 vs 0.89; ICCunjust 0.93 vs 0.89). More pediatric surgeons preferred the Clavien-Madadi classification for the case scenarios (43.0% vs 11.8%; p = 0.002) and advantages of the Clavien-Madadi were confirmed by 81.4% of the surgeons.

CONCLUSION

The Clavien-Madadi classification is an accurate and reliable instrument for the grading of unexpected events in pediatric surgery. We therefore recommend its application in clinical and academic pediatric surgical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Push-PEG or Pull-PEG: Does the Technique Matter? A Prospective Study Comparing Outcomes After Gastrostomy Placement

BACKGROUND

Push-PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) with T-fastener fixation (PEG-T) allows one-step insertion of a balloon tube or button, and avoids contamination of the stoma by oral bacteria. However, PEG-T is a technically more demanding procedure with a significant learning curve. The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes after PEG-T and pull-PEG in a setting where both procedures were well established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study is a prospective cohort study including all patients between 0 and 18 year undergoing PEG-T and pull-PEG between 2017 and 2020 at a combined local and tertiary referral center. Complications and parent reported outcomes were recorded during hospital stay, after 14 days and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

82 (93%) of eligible PEG-T and 37 (86%) pull-PEG patients were included. The groups were not significantly different with regard to age or weight. Malignant disorders and heart conditions were more frequent in the pull-PEG group, whilst neurodevelopmental disorders were more frequent in the PEG-T group (p < 0.001). 54% in both groups had a complication within 2 weeks. Late complications (between 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively) occurred in 63% PEG-T vs 62% pull-PEG patients (p = 0.896). More parents in the pull-PEG group (49%) reported that the gastrostomy tube restricted their child's activity, compared to PEG-T (24%) (p = 0.01). At 3 months follow-up, more pull-PEG patients (43%) reported discomfort from the gastrostomy compared to PEG-T (21%) (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Overall complication rates were approximately similar, but pull-PEG was associated with more discomfort and restriction of activity.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Treatment study level II.

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in neonates and infants is safe and efficient

Introduction

Dismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) is a well-accepted treatment modality for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children. However, its efficacy and safety in infants, particularly neonates, remain uncertain. To address this significant knowledge gap, we aimed to compare outcomes between a cohort of neonates and infants undergoing LP vs. open pyeloplasty (OP) at less than 6 months and 6 weeks of age.

Material and methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from patients who underwent primary pyeloplasty at our institution between 2000 and 2022. Only patients aged 6 months or less at the time of surgery were included, excluding redo-procedures or conversions. Ethical approval was obtained, and data were assessed for redo-pyeloplasty and postoperative complications, classified according to the Clavien-Madadi classification. A standard postoperative assessment was performed 6 weeks postoperatively. This included an isotope scan and a routine ultrasound up to the year 2020.

Results

A total of 91 eligible patients were identified, of which 49 underwent LP and 42 underwent OP. Patients receiving LP had a median age of 11.4 (1-25.4) weeks, compared to 13.8 (0.5-25.9) weeks for those receiving OP (p > 0.31). Both groups in our main cohort had an age range of 0-6 months at the time of surgery. Nineteen patients were younger than 6 weeks at the time of surgery. The mean operating time was longer for LP (161 ± 43 min) than that for OP (109 ± 32 min, p < 0.001). However, the mean operating time was not longer in the patient group receiving LP at ≤6 weeks (145 ± 21.6) compared to that in our main cohort receiving LP. There was no significant difference in the length of stay between the groups. Four patients after LP required emergency nephrostomy compared to one patient after OP. The rate of revision pyeloplasty in our main cohort aged 0-6 months at surgery was 8% in the patient group receiving LP and 14% in the patient group receiving OP (not significant). Three revisions after LP were due to persistent UPJO, and one was due to stent migration. Only one patient requiring revision pyeloplasty was less than 6 weeks old.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is one of the largest collectives of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed in infants, and it is the youngest cohort published to date. Based on our experience, LP in neonates and infants under 6 months appears to be as effective as open surgery.

Finnish Pediatric Surgery Hub - From Centralization to Collective Learning and Sharing of Expertise

AIM OF THE STUDY

Continuous surgical developments, growing awareness of patient representatives and limited health-care resources are pushing for innovative approaches to ensure equal high-quality pediatric surgical care. We aimed to describe early experiences and assess surgical safety of a novel nationwide pediatric surgery collaborative initiative.

METHODS

In 2021, general pediatric surgeons representing all five independent university hospitals performing neonatal surgery in Finland initiated national collaboration, the Finnish pediatric surgery hub (FPSH), for sharing of surgical expertise and collective learning. For each case addressed by FPSH, place of care and surgical team were decided individually, and when deemed necessary, operations were performed in cooperation. Operations performed during 2021-2023 and associated early (<30 days) postoperative complications were analyzed according to Clavien-Madadi classification.

RESULTS

Of the total 40 surgeries managed co-operatively by FPSH, 30 (75%) took place in local university hospitals and 10 in Helsinki University Hospital. There were 34 (85%) elective and 6 urgent cases, which were operated within median 1 (range, 1-3) days. Most frequent underlying diagnoses included anorectal malformations, esophageal atresia and Hirschsprung disease. Overall, 12 (30%) had any early postoperative complications, all Clavien-Madadi grade IIIB or lower, and five patients (13%) were reoperated. Rate or grade of complications was not associated with place of care. In addition to regular virtual case meetings, national care protocols and research projects were introduced.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary findings suggest that our national collaborative initiative, FPSH, not only provided practical and safe framework for sharing of surgical expertise but also for collective learning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Prevalence and early surgical outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the Netherlands: a population-based cohort study from the European Pediatric Surgical Audit

BACKGROUND

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a rare birth defect with substantial mortality. This study aims to generate a population-based overview of CDH care and outcomes in the Netherlands. Moreover, it assesses interhospital variations between the two Dutch CDH expert centres.

METHODS

This study uses data from the Dutch branch of the European Pediatric Surgical Audit, a prospective clinical audit for congenital anomalies. Data of all patients with CDH treated between 2014 and 2021 were included for epidemiological analysis. For comparative analyses, patients presenting after the neonatal period or not treated in the two CDH expert centres were excluded. Identified interhospital variations were assessed using regression analysis.

RESULTS

In the study period, 283 children with CDH were born, resulting in a national prevalence rate of 2.06/10 000 live births. The patient population, treatment and outcomes at 1 year were comparable between the hospitals, except for length of hospital stay. Regression analysis identified the treating hospital as the strongest significant predictor thereof. Other factors associated with longer length of stay include the presence of other malformations, intrathoracic liver position on prenatal ultrasound, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment, patch repair, complicated postoperative course and discharge to home rather than to another care facility.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of CDH care throughout the Netherlands are comparable. However, the length of stay differed between the two hospitals, also when adjusting for other covariates. Further qualitative analysis to explain this interhospital variation is indicated. Our findings underscore the potential of clinical auditing as a quality measurement tool in rare conditions.

Lymph node metastases are more frequent in paediatric appendiceal NET ≥1.5 cm but without impact on outcome - Data from the German MET studies

BACKGROUND

Paediatric appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours (appNET) are very rare tumours, mostly detected incidentally by histopathological evaluation after appendectomy. Treatment recommendations are based on adult data considering high-risk NET as defined by European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) guidelines for completion right-sided hemicolectomy (RHC). Recent data suggest that less aggressive therapy may be justified.

PROCEDURE

Analysis of children and adolescents with appNET prospectively registered with the German Malignant Endocrine Tumour (MET) studies between 1997 and 2022.

RESULTS

By December 2022, 662 patients (64.7% females, 35.3% male) had been reported. Median age was 13.3 years [4.5-17.9], median duration of follow-up 2.2 years [0-10.9]. No distant metastases were reported. Tumour size was <1 cm in 63.5%, 1-2 cm in 33.2%, and >2 cm in 3.2% of patients. WHO grade 1 and 2 tumours were diagnosed in 76.9% and 23.1% of patients, respectively. Lymphovascular invasion and lymph node metastases were associated with tumour size ≥1.5 cm. 27.0% of patients presented with high-risk NET according to ENETS criteria. Of those, only 55.9% underwent secondary oncological right hemicolectomy. Neither distant metastases, nor recurrences or disease-related deaths occurred in patients with appendectomy only as well as in patients with completion RHC. Overall and event-free survival were both 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Internationally harmonized consensus recommendations on treatment of children and adolescents with appendiceal NET are urgently needed to avoid completion RHC in high-risk patients.

Benchmarks for Pediatric Surgical Registries: Recommendations for the Assessment and Grading of Complications

Procedure-related registries in general surgical practice offer a platform for prospective trials, the pooling of data, and detailed outcome analysis. Recommendations by the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term follow-up (IDEAL) collaboration and Outcome4Medicine have further improved the uniform reporting of complications and adverse events.In the pediatric surgical network, disease-specific registries for rare and inherited congenital anomalies are gaining importance, fostering international collaborations on studies of low-incidence diseases. However, to date, reporting of complications in the pediatric surgical registries has been inconsistent. Therefore, the European Reference Network for Rare Inherited and Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) recently endorsed the validation of the first severity grading system for children. The planned reform of the European Paediatric Surgical Audit (EPSA) registry, which includes the implementation of the Clavien-Madadi classification, represents a further effort to establish uniform outcome reporting.This article provides an overview of experiences with surgical registries and complication reporting, along with the potential application of this knowledge to future pediatric surgical practice.

I Walk the Line: Between Basic Science and Paediatric Surgery

The role of a basic scientist working with paediatric surgeons is not an obvious one. However, there are several levels at which science can contribute to the speciality, and also ways that scientists can learn useful lessons from paediatric surgery. As most conditions treated by paediatric surgeons have low case numbers, we need to find ways of defining optimal treatment and developing novel therapies within a challenging number of patients.