Longitudinal study of intraneural perineurioma--a benign, focal hypertrophic neuropathy of youth

The Role of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Intraneural Perineurioma

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Reports on imaging-based diagnosis of intraneural perineurioma remain limited. This study aimed to summarize the role of ultrasound in diagnosing intraneural perineuriomas to enhance clinical awareness and diagnostic accuracy among clinicians and ultrasonographers.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 11 patients diagnosed with intraneural perineurioma through surgery or biopsy at our hospital between June 2015 and June 2022. All patients underwent ultrasonography, and their ultrasonographic characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients presented with isolated mononeuropathy. Sonography revealed fusiform enlargement of the affected nerve. The length of the lesion ranged from 1.5 to 20.0 (5.2 ± 5.4) cm. The intraneural perineuriomas were hypoechoic relative to skeletal muscle. The internal homogeneity was heterogeneous, without posterior acoustic enhancement. The lesion was centrally located within the nerve. The inner epineurium was blurred with a continuous fascicular structure. Two patients had hyperechoic calcifications with posterior acoustic shadows in their lesions. Vascularization assessment using color or power Doppler imaging revealed blood flow in all the tumors. The cross-sectional area of the affected nerves was at least twice as large as that of the contralateral side, with some patients exhibiting up to an eight-fold increase.

DISCUSSION

High-frequency ultrasonography provides important evidence for the clinical diagnosis of intraneural perineurioma. When combined with magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiological studies, ultrasound can aid in clinical decision-making and facilitate long-term monitoring. Given its accessibility and diagnostic potential, ultrasonography can be one of the preferred imaging examinations for evaluating intraneural perineuriomas.

Age and Sex Differences in Pediatric Neuropathic Pain and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Age and sex differences may exist in the frequency (incidence, prevalence) or symptoms of neuropathic pain (NP) and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) due to biopsychosocial factors (eg, neurodevelopment, physiological and hormonal changes, psychosocial differences) that evolve through childhood and adolescence. Age and sex differences may have implications for evaluating screening and diagnostic tools and treatment interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To map the existing literature on pediatric NP and CRPS with respect to age and sex distributions, and age and sex differences in symptomology and frequency.

METHODS

A scoping literature review was conducted. Databases were searched from inception to January 2023. Data were collected on study design, setting, demographics, and age and sex differences in frequency and symptoms.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven studies were included. Distribution of participants with CRPS (n=37 studies) was predominantly early adolescence (10 to 14 y) and female sex, while NP (n=42 studies) was most commonly reported throughout adolescence (10 to 19 y) in both sexes. Forty-one studies examined age and sex differences in frequency; 6 studies reported higher frequency in adolescence. Very few studies (n=11) examined differences in symptomology.

DISCUSSION

Large epidemiological studies are required to further understand age and sex differences in frequency of pediatric NP and CRPS. Age and sex differences must be considered when evaluating screening and diagnostic tools and treatment interventions to ensure relevance and validity to both sexes and across ages. Validated tools will improve understanding of age-dependent and sex-dependent differences in symptoms, pathophysiology, and psychosocial impact of pediatric NP and CRPS.

An algorithmic approach to the management of peripheral nerve tumours

This article reviews the pathology and management of peripheral nerve tumours, including a framework for investigation and decision-making. Most tumours are benign, including schwannomas and neurofibromas, but malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours can occur. The risk of malignant change is remote for schwannomas but higher for neurofibromas, particularly in neurofibromatosis type 1. Magnetic resonance imaging is useful for defining the relationship of a swelling with adjacent nerves but is not definitive for tissue diagnosis. Increasing size, pain and neurological deficit suggest malignant change and TruCut needle biopsy is indicated, although there is a risk of sampling error. Excision biopsy preserving nerve function may be carried out for benign tumours to relieve symptoms. Malignant tumours require a multidisciplinary approach. Complete surgical excision with clear margins is the only curative treatment and may be supplemented with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, prognosis remains poor, particularly for patients with neurofibromatosis.

Neurosurgical Intervention for Nerve and Muscle Biopsies

(1) Background: Neurologic and musculoskeletal diseases represent a considerable portion of the underlying etiologies responsible for the widely prevalent symptoms of pain, weakness, numbness, and paresthesia. Because of the subjective and often nonspecific nature of these symptoms, different diagnostic modalities have been explored and utilized. (2) Methods: Literature review. (3) Results: Nerve and muscle biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing many of the responsible neurological and musculoskeletal conditions. However, the need for invasive tissue sampling is diminishing as more investigations explore alternative diagnostic modalities. Because of this, it is important to explore the current role of neurosurgical intervention for nerve and muscle biopsies and its current relevance in the diagnostic landscape of neurological and musculoskeletal disorders. With consideration of the role of nerve and muscle biopsy, it is also important to explore innovations and emerging techniques for conducting these procedures. This review explores the indications and emerging techniques for neurological intervention for nerve and muscle biopsies. (4) Conclusions: The role of neurosurgical intervention for nerve and muscle biopsy remains relevant in diagnosing many neurological and musculoskeletal disorders. Biopsy is especially relevant as a supportive point of evidence for diagnosis in atypical cases. Additionally, emerging techniques have been explored to guide diagnostics and biopsy, conduct less invasive biopsies, and reduce risks of worsening neurologic function and other symptoms secondary to biopsy.

Treatment of childhood intraneural perineurioma: A case report and literature review

Background

Intraneural perineurioma is a rare, benign slow-growing lesion that usually involves a single main trunk nerve during childhood and young adulthood. The treatment of intraneural perineurioma is still a subject of controversy, especially in fast-growing children. To date, there was no systemic analysis of intraneural perineurioma in children.

Method

A case of Intraneural perineurioma affecting the left sciatic nerve with 2 years of follow-up was presented. A systematic review was performed on literature published before June 2023, focusing on intraneural perineurioma diagnosed at no older than 18 years old.

Result

A 9-year-old boy presented with progressive left foot-drop and abnormal gait for 2 years. The electromyography and magnetic resonance neurography study confirmed neuropathy involving the left sciatic nerves and its branches. Pathological investigation of the left sural nerve confirmed the diagnosis of intraneural perineurioma. The boy received physical therapy, and the disease was stable during the 2 years of follow-up. Fifty-seven childhood cases were identified in literature. Five patients with oral intraneural perineurioma underwent excision of the mass with good outcomes. In the other 52 patients with peripheral nerve involvement, 25 of them received surgical treatment, with different outcomes according to different operations. Out of 33 cases with precise lesion sizes, the length of the lesion in patients without nerve resection was significantly longer than that in patients with nerve resection (12.86 ± 7.44 cm vs 4.57 ± 4.5 cm. p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Intraneural perineuriomas are rare benign tumors with slow progression. The options for surgery should be cautiously considered in childhood patients with long segmental peripheral nerve involvement.

[Interdisciplinary Treatment Of Tumorous And Tumour-Like Lesions Of Peripheral Nerves]

Tumorous or tumour-like lesions of peripheral nerves are generally rare, heterogeneous and challenging to diagnose and treat. They may become apparent by a palpable swelling (lump) near nerves, sensory and/or motor deficits, pain to touch or neuropathic pain. In 91% of cases, tumours are benign. The differentiation of entities and their characteristics as well as a function-preserving resection strategy are highly relevant. Misdiagnosis and inadequate treatment can lead to severe deficits and pain syndromes. Benign tumours include schwannomas and neurofibromas, which can occur sporadically but can also be associated with neurogenetic tumour disposition syndromes if they occur more frequently. Rarer benign nerve tumours include perineuriomas, lipomas, aggressive fibrosis (desmoid tumours), paragangliomas and haemangiomas. Ganglion cysts are described as tumour-like lesions. The association of nerve tumours with neurogenetic syndromes and the correct classification of potentially malignant lesions such as MPNST (malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour) or intermediate stages such as ANNUBPs (atypical neurofibromatous neoplasms with unknown biological potential) pose particular challenges. Interdisciplinarity is highly relevant for clinical treatment and a correct diagnosis. The aim of our work is to provide an overview of the relevant entities, diagnostic evaluation and contemporary treatment strategies based on the current data situation and taking into account the recently published interdisciplinary AWMF S2k guideline "Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Nerve Tumours".

Sciatic and tibial neuropathies

The sciatic nerve is the body's largest peripheral nerve. Along with their two terminal divisions (tibial and fibular), their anatomic location makes them particularly vulnerable to trauma and iatrogenic injuries. A thorough understanding of the functional anatomy is required to adequately localize lesions in this lengthy neural pathway. Proximal disorders of the nerve can be challenging to precisely localize among a range of possibilities including lumbosacral pathology, radiculopathy, or piriformis syndrome. A correct diagnosis is based upon a thorough history and physical examination, which will then appropriately direct adjunctive investigations such as imaging and electrodiagnostic testing. Disorders of the sciatic nerve and its terminal branches are disabling for patients, and expert assessment by rehabilitation professionals is important in limiting their impact. Applying techniques established in the upper extremity, surgical reconstruction of lower extremity nerve dysfunction is rapidly improving and evolving. These new techniques, such as nerve transfers, require electrodiagnostic assessment of both the injured nerve(s) as well as healthy, potential donor nerves as part of a complete neurophysiological examination.

7T for clinical imaging of benign peripheral nerve tumors: preliminary results

PURPOSE

MRI has become an essential diagnostic imaging modality for peripheral nerve pathology. Early MR imaging for peripheral nerve depended on inferred nerve involvement by visualizing downstream effects such as denervation muscular atrophy; improvements in MRI technology have made possible direct visualization of the nerves. In this paper, we share our early clinical experience with 7T for benign neurogenic tumors.

MATERIALS

Patients with benign neurogenic tumors and 7T MRI examinations available were reviewed. Cases of individual benign peripheral nerve tumors were included to demonstrate 7T MRI imaging characteristics. All exams were performed on a 7T MRI MAGNETOM Terra using a 28-channel receive, single-channel transmit knee coil.

RESULTS

Five cases of four pathologies were selected from 38 patients to depict characteristic imaging features in different benign nerve tumors and lesions using 7T MRI.

CONCLUSION

The primary advantage of 7T over 3T is an increase in signal-to-noise ratio which allows higher in plane resolution so that the smallest neural structures can be seen and characterized. This improvement in MR imaging provides the opportunity for more accurate diagnosis and surgical planning in selected cases. As this technology continues to evolve for clinical purposes, we anticipate increasing applications and improved patient care using 7T MRI for the diagnosis of peripheral nerve masses.

What is new in intraneural perineurioma?

Since the initial description of intraneural (IN) perineurioma in 1964, advances in the understanding of the clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging, pathologic features, and genetic underpinnings have changed how this pathology is managed. IN perineuriomas are rare, benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors, most frequently coming to clinical attention when patients present with painless, progressive weakness or sensory loss in adolescence or young adulthood. The gold standard of diagnosis has traditionally been with targeted tissue biopsy demonstrating "pseudo-onion bulb" formation with positive epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) staining. However, modern magnetic resonance imaging is allowing some patients to forgo biopsy. Recent genetic studies of IN perineuriomas have demonstrated common TRAF7 point mutations and rare NF2 mutations, which may present targets for diagnosis or therapy in the future. Current advances have allowed for us to provide improved patient counseling with informed understanding for various clinical scenarios. With the workup and diagnosis now clearly defined, the next frontier is for improving the lives of patients with IN perineuriomas through the interaction between restoration of functional deficits and advances in our understanding of the genetics of this entity.

Beyond schwannomas and neurofibromas: a radiological and histopathological review of lesser-known benign lesions that arise in association with peripheral nerves

Peripheral nerve sheath tumors comprise a significant percentage of both benign and malignant soft tissue tumors. The vast majority of these lesions are schwannomas and neurofibromas, which most radiologists are familiar with including the well-described multimodality imaging features. However, numerous additional often under-recognized benign entities associated with nerves exist. These rarer entities are becoming increasingly encountered with the proliferation of cross-sectional imaging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is important for the radiologist to have a basic understanding of these entities as many have near-pathognomonic MR imaging features as well as specific clinical presentations that when interpreted in concert, often allows for a limited differential or single best diagnosis. The ability to provide a prospective, pre-intervention diagnosis based solely on imaging and clinical presentation is crucial as several of these entities are "do not touch" lesions, for which even a biopsy may have deleterious consequences. To our knowledge, the majority of these benign entities associated with nerves have only been described in scattered case reports or small case series. Therefore, the aim of this article is to provide a radiopathologic comprehensive review of these benign entities that arise in association with nerves with a focus on characteristic MRI features, unique histopathologic findings, and entity specific clinical exam findings/presentation.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral and Cranial Nerve Tumors with Expert Recommendations: An EUropean Network for RAre CANcers (EURACAN) Initiative

The 2021 WHO classification of the CNS Tumors identifies as "Peripheral nerve sheath tumors" (PNST) some entities with specific clinical and anatomical characteristics, histological and molecular markers, imaging findings, and aggressiveness. The Task Force has reviewed the evidence of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, which is particularly low due to the rarity, and drawn recommendations accordingly. Tumor diagnosis is primarily based on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections and immunohistochemistry. Molecular analysis is not essential to establish the histological nature of these tumors, although genetic analyses on DNA extracted from PNST (neurofibromas/schwannomas) is required to diagnose mosaic forms of NF1 and SPS. MRI is the gold-standard to delineate the extension with respect to adjacent structures. Gross-total resection is the first choice, and can be curative in benign lesions; however, the extent of resection must be balanced with preservation of nerve functioning. Radiotherapy can be omitted in benign tumors after complete resection and in NF-related tumors, due to the theoretic risk of secondary malignancies in a tumor-suppressor syndrome. Systemic therapy should be considered in incomplete resected plexiform neurofibromas/MPNSTs. MEK inhibitor selumetinib can be used in NF1 children ≥2 years with inoperable/symptomatic plexiform neurofibromas, while anthracycline-based treatment is the first choice for unresectable/locally advanced/metastatic MPNST. Clinical trials on other MEK1-2 inhibitors alone or in combination with mTOR inhibitors are under investigation in plexiform neurofibromas and MPNST, respectively.

Ultrasound and MR imaging of peripheral nerve tumors: the state of the art

Peripheral nerve sheath tumors are a heterogeneous subgroup of soft tissue tumors that either arise from a peripheral nerve or show nerve sheath differentiation. On imaging, direct continuity with a neural structure or location along a typical nerve distribution represents the most important signs to suggest the diagnosis. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are the best modalities to evaluate these lesions. First, it is necessary to differentiate between a true tumor and a non-neoplastic nerve condition such as a neuroma, peripheral nerve ganglion, intraneural venous malformation, lipomatosis of nerve, or nerve focal hypertrophy. Then, with a combination of clinical features, conventional and advanced imaging appearances, it is usually possible to characterize neurogenic tumors confidently. This article reviews the features of benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, including the rare and recently described tumor types. Furthermore, other malignant neoplasms of peripheral nerves as well as non-neoplastic conditions than can mimick neurogenic tumor are herein discussed.

Plexal intraneural perineurioma: an analysis of the clinicoradiologic presentation of this rare variant

PURPOSE

Intraneural (IN) perineurioma is a rare benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor, typically presenting as a painless, progressive mononeuropathy in adolescents. A rare plexal variant has been described, although there are little data describing its clinicoradiologic features. Herein, we present the largest case series of plexal IN perineuriomas reported in the literature.

METHODS

Electronic medical records (EMR) from 1990 to 2022 from a single academic institution were reviewed for a diagnosis of IN perineurioma involving the brachial or lumbosacral plexus. This identified 18 patients, of which 17 had available MR imaging. We reviewed the EMR for demographics, clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were identified. Most patients were male (11/18, 61%) and first developed symptoms at the age of 9.6 years (range 7 months to 55 years). Diagnosis occurred on average at the age of 22 years (4-57 years), which is significantly earlier than distal IN perineurioma (p = 0.0096). All patients (100%, 17/17) presented with motor polyneuropathy and muscular atrophy in multiple nerve distributions, with associated sensory loss (12/17, 71%). Most plexal lesions occurred in the brachial plexus (66%, 12/18). Five (29%, 5/17) patients presented with a hand/foot discrepancy, and 5 patients (29%) had a limb length discrepancy. Five patients underwent tendon transfer, of which two had failure of tendon transfer at most recent follow-up (50%, 2/4) due to progression of neurologic loss affecting the donors. Of patients managed nonoperatively, 87% of patients (6/7) with follow-up information demonstrated disease progression with worsening motor function or sensory loss, and 2 patients demonstrated progression on imaging at most recent follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Plexal perineurioma represents an uncommon variant of IN perineurioma that presents as a progressive motor and sensory polyneuropathy in childhood or early adolescence. Surgical management remains controversial, and tendon transfer tends to result in poor long-term surgical outcomes.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Nerve Tumors

Nerve tumors are uncommon soft tissue neoplasms predominantly arising from peripheral nerve sheath and Schwann cells. We review the manifestations of benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors, concentrating on distinguishing imaging features of schwannomas versus neurofibromas with an emphasis on treatment implications. Nevertheless, there is often an overlap between the imaging presentation of these two conditions, making the accurate radiologic diagnosis challenging. Therefore, tissue sampling is often needed for a definitive histologic diagnosis. Treatment planning largely depends on symptoms, location of the lesion, and underlying risk factors. Three major syndromes, neurofibromatosis type 1, type 2, and schwannomatosis, predispose patients to peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs), with particular concern about the malignant subtype expression. In patients with suspected PNSTs, correlation of imaging findings with clinical findings and genetic tests is helpful for a more accurate diagnosis and disease management. Some imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography can be helpful to differentiate malignant from benign subtypes.

Rare case of Ulnar Nerve Intraneural Perineurioma in an elderly gentleman

Intraneural perineurioma (IPN) is a rare benign neoplasm of the peripheral nerve sheath, most commonly affecting the sciatic nerve of adolescents or young adults. We present a rare case of perineurioma in a 67-year-old man with an infiltrative clinical presentation affecting his ulnar nerve. Complete excision required en-bloc resection of the ulnar neurovascular bundle from mid-forearm to mid-palm with sural nerve and saphenous vein grafts used to reconstruct the ulnar nerve and artery, respectively. Despite recurrence from a previously localized excision, there has been no recurrence to date following en-bloc resection. The available literature on intraneural perineurioma is reviewed in light of this case report. IPN is an important entity because of its ability to mimic neural malignancies, and this case challenges the assertion that it is a tumour that occurs strictly in the young.

Nerve conduction assessment and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of localized hypertrophic neuropathy of the sciatic nerve and the lumbo-sacral plexus

Localized hypertrophic neuropathy (LHN) are slowly growing nerve lesions causing progressive nerve deficit and weakness. We present the case of a 32-year old woman with long history of motor and sensory deficit complains along the sciatic nerve territory. The muscles involved were featured by delay in F waves at nerve conduction assessment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed specific patterns, low intense on T1 and abnormally hyper intense on short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and T2, with no obvious enhancement, features compatible with either LHN or intraneural perineurioma (IP) of the sciatic nerve and/or the lumbosacral plexus. Focal thickening and hypertrophy of the sciatic nerve with preserved fascicular configuration and progressive enlargement of the right lumbosacral plexus could be noted. A nerve conduction assessment followed by an MRI eventually allowed to diagnose LHN, without performing a nerve biopsy. Although similar, LHN and IP are two distinct lesions which should be diagnosed and differentiated as soon as possible, to avoid potential complications due to delayed diagnosis and/or misdiagnosis.

Nerve biopsy in acquired neuropathies

A diagnosis of neuropathy can typically be determined through clinical assessment and focused investigation. With technological advances, including significant progress in genomics, the role of nerve biopsy has receded over recent years. However, making a specific and, in some cases, tissue-based diagnosis is essential across a wide array of potentially treatable acquired peripheral neuropathies. When laboratory investigations do not suggest a definitive diagnosis, nerve biopsy remains the final step to ascertain the etiology of the disease. The present review highlights the utility of nerve biopsy in confirming a diagnosis, while further illustrating the importance of a tissue-based diagnosis in relation to treatment strategies, particularly when linked to long-term immunosuppressive therapies.

The efficacy and safety of MR-HIFU and US-HIFU in treating uterine fibroids with the volume <300 cm3: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a promising and non-invasive therapy for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Currently, the main image-guided methods for HIFU include magnetic resonance-guided (MR-HIFU) and ultrasound-guided (US-HIFU). However, there are few comparative studies on the therapeutic efficacy and safety of MR-HIFU and US-HIFU in treating symptomatic uterine fibroids with a volume <300 cm³.

OBJECTIVE

We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MR-HIFU and US-HIFU in treating symptomatic uterine fibroids with a volume <300 cm³.

METHODS

We searched relevant literature in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library CNKI from inception until 2021. The mean value, the proportion, and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were measured by random-effects models. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots.

RESULTS

48 studies met our inclusion criteria-28 describing MR-HIFU and 20 describing US-HIFU. The mean non-perfused volume rate (NPVR) was 81.07% in the US-HIFU group and 58.92% in the MR-HIFU group, respectively. The mean volume reduction rates at month-3, month-6, and month-12 were 42.42, 58.72, and 65.55% in the US-HIFU group, while 34.79, 37.39, and 36.44% in the MR-HIFU group. The incidence of post-operative abdominal pain and abnormal vaginal discharge in the US-HIFU group was lower than that of MRI-HIFU. However, post-operative skin burn and sciatic nerve pain were more common in the US-HIFU group compared with MRI-HIFU. The one-year reintervention rate after MR-HIFU was 13.4%, which was higher than 5.2% in the US-HIFU group.

CONCLUSION

US-HIFU may show better efficiency and safety than MR-HIFU in treating symptomatic fibroids with a volume <300 cm³.

Morphology of the entering and exiting nerve as a differentiating feature of benign from malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours of the brachial plexus

OBJECTIVE

To identify if morphology of the entering and exiting nerve involved by a nerve sheath tumour in the brachial plexus can help differentiate between benign (B) and malignant (M) peripheral nerve sheath tumours (PNSTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of 85 patients with histologically confirmed primary PNSTs of the brachial plexus over a 12.5-year period. Clinical data and all available MRI studies were independently evaluated by 2 consultant musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to the final histopathological diagnosis assessing for maximal lesion dimension, visibility and morphology of the entering and exiting nerve, and other well-documented features of PNSTs.

RESULTS

The study included 47 males and 38 females with mean age 46.7 years (range, 8-81 years). There were 73 BPNSTs and 12 MPNSTs. The entering nerve was not identified in 5 (7%), was normal in 17 (23%), was tapered in 38 (52%) and showed lobular enlargement in 13 (18%) BPNSTs compared with 0 (0%), 0 (0%), 2 (17%) and 10 (83%) MPNSTs respectively. The exiting nerve was not identified in 5 (7%), was normal in 20 (27%), was tapered in 42 (58%) and showed lobular enlargement in 6 (8%) BPNSTs compared with 4 (33%), 0 (0%), 2 (17%) and 6 (50%) MPNSTs respectively. Increasing tumour size, entering and exiting nerve morphology and suspected MRI diagnosis were statistically significant differentiators between BPNST and MPNST (p < 0.001). IOC for nerve status was poor to fair but improved to good if normal/tapered appearance were considered together with improved specificity of 81-91% for BPNST and sensitivity of 75-83%.

CONCLUSIONS

Morphology of the adjacent nerve is a useful additional MRI feature for distinguishing BPNST from MPNST of the brachial plexus.

Nerve biopsy: Current indications and decision tools

After initial investigation of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of neuropathy, a clinical decision is made for a minority of patients to undergo further assessment with nerve biopsy. Many nerve biopsies do not demonstrate a definitive pathological diagnosis and there is considerable cost and morbidity associated with the procedure. This highlights the need for appropriate selection of patients, nerves and neuropathology techniques. Additionally, concomitant muscle and skin biopsies may improve the diagnostic yield in some cases. Several advances have been made in diagnostics in recent years, particularly in genomics. The indications for nerve biopsy have consequently changed over time. This review explores the current indications for nerve biopsies and some of the issues surrounding its use. Also included are comments on alternative diagnostic modalities that may help to supplant or reduce the use of nerve biopsy as a diagnostic test. These primarily include extraneural biopsy and neuroimaging techniques such as magnetic resonance neurography and nerve ultrasound. Finally, we propose an algorithm to assist in deciding when to perform nerve biopsies.

A novel mechanism for the formation and propagation of neural tumors and lesions through neural highways

By recognizing anatomic and radiologic patterns of rare and often misdiagnosed peripheral nerve tumors/lesions, we have defined mechanisms for the propagation of neural diseases. The novel concept of the nervous system serving as a complex system of "highways" driving the neural and perineural spread of these lesions is described in three examples: Intraneural dissection of joint fluid in intraneural ganglion cysts, perineural spread of cancer cells, and dissemination of unknown concentrations of neurotrophic/inhibitory factors for growth in hamartomas/choristomas of nerve. Further mapping of these pathways to identify the natural history of diseases, the spectrum of disease evolution, the role of genetic mutations, and how these neural pathways interface with the lymphatic, vascular, and cerebrospinal systems may lead to advances in targeted treatments.

Clinical Features, Natural History, and Outcomes of Intraneural Perineuriomas: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Intraneural perineurioma is a rare peripheral nerve sheath tumor characterized by localized proliferation of perineurial cells. The literature consists predominantly of case reports and institutional series, with inconsistent and confusing nomenclature. We present a pooled analysis of all reported cases of intraneural perineurioma in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was performed according to PRISMA guidelines to identify all reported cases of intraneural perineurioma in the literature. Individual cases were pooled and analyzed for demographics, clinical features, and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 172 cases were identified across 72 studies, of which 149 were found in major peripheral nerves and their branches. Median age of patients at diagnosis and onset of symptoms was 18 years (interquartile range [IQR], 12-34 years) years and 13.5 years (IQR, 8-26 years), respectively, with 54.4% (81/149) being female. The most common sites were the sciatic nerve or its branches (41.9%), median nerve (13.5%), radial nerve (12.2%), and brachial plexus (12.2%). Most patients were managed conservatively (52.9%; 72/136). Among those managed conservatively with available follow-up (n = 31), median follow-up was 11 months, and most (67.7%, n = 21) reported no change in neurologic status, although worsening was noted in 29.0% (9/31). Among surgically managed cases (n = 64), the most common intervention was resection with or without repair (62.5%; 40/64), neurolysis (25%; 16/64), or tendon transfers without resection (12.5%; 8/64). No lesion recurred after surgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraneural perineurioma represents a benign focal lesion presenting with weakness and atrophy affecting adolescents and young adults. Most cases are managed nonoperatively and surgical treatment strategies are varied.

Perineurioma: A Rare Entity of Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors

OBJECTIVE

 Intraneural perineurioma is a rare tumor entity. It is a benign, very slow growing peripheral nerve sheath tumor that typically occurs in children and young adults. Motor deficits and muscle atrophy are classic presenting symptoms, while sensory deficits are rare at the onset of the disease. Recommended treatment strategies are lacking. We have evaluated the clinical follow-up and our experience with treatment of this rare entity.

METHODS

 A total of 30 patients with intraneural perineuriomas were assessed retrospectively. Demographic data, clinical symptoms, diagnostic examinations, therapy strategies, and clinical outcome were analyzed. Descriptive statistical methods were used for evaluation.

RESULTS

 The mean age was 22 years. Eleven women and 19 men were affected. The lesion occurred in the area of the upper extremity in 16 patients and in the area of the lower extremity in 14 patients. The most frequently affected nerve was the sciatic nerve, followed by the radial nerve. All patients showed a motor deficit to some extent. Seventy percent (n = 21) revealed atrophy, 43.3% (n = 13) had sensitive deficits, and 17% (n = 5) suffered of pain. Fascicle biopsies were performed in 26 patients (87%). In four patients (13%), the tumor was completely resected and then reconstructed via nerve grafts. Seventy percent of the patients (n = 21) received a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 5 years postoperatively, in which no progress was shown.

CONCLUSIONS

 To diagnose perineurioma, it is essential to take a biopsy of an enlarged, nonfunctional fascicle. Furthermore, a long-distance epineuriotomy to decompress the hypertrophic fascicle is reasonable. To preserve the nerves' residual function, a complete resection is not recommended. Results after grafting are poor. One reason for this might be residual tumor cells along the nerve that cannot be visualized. Malignant transformation is not yet reported and tumor growth is stable for years.

Recurrent Fusion of the GRB2 Associated Binding Protein 1 (GAB1) Gene With ABL Proto-oncogene 1 (ABL1) in Benign Pediatric Soft Tissue Tumors

BACKGROUND/AIM

Fusions of the ABL proto-oncogene 1 gene (ABL1 in 9q34) are common in leukemias but rare in solid tumors. The most notable is the t(9;22)(q34;q11)/BCR-ABL1 coding for a chimeric tyrosine kinase. We herein report an ABL1-fusion in a pediatric tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

G-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing were performed on a soft tissue perineurioma found in the left musculus erector spinae of a child.

RESULTS

A der(4)t(4;9)(q31;q34) and a fusion of the GRB2 associated binding protein 1 (GAB1 in 4q31) gene with ABL1 were found. A literature search revealed 3 more cases with similar genetic and clinicopathological characteristics: a soft tissue perineurioma with t(2;9;4)(p23;q34;q31) and ABL1 rearrangement, a soft tissue angiofibroma with a GAB1-ABL1 chimeric gene, and a solitary fibrous tumor carrying a der(4)t(4;9)(q31.1;q34).

CONCLUSION

GAB1-ABL1 is a recurrent fusion gene in benign pediatric tumors.

Diagnostic Pathology of Tumors of Peripheral Nerve

Neoplasms of the peripheral nervous system represent a heterogenous group with a wide spectrum of morphological features and biological potential. They range from benign and curable by complete excision (schwannoma and soft tissue perineurioma) to benign but potentially aggressive at the local level (plexiform neurofibroma) to the highly malignant (malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors [MPNST]). In this review, we discuss the diagnostic and pathologic features of common peripheral nerve sheath tumors, particularly those that may be encountered in the intracranial compartment or in the spine and paraspinal region. The discussion will cover schwannoma, neurofibroma, atypical neurofibromatous neoplasms of uncertain biological potential, intraneural and soft tissue perineurioma, hybrid nerve sheath tumors, MPNST, and the recently renamed enigmatic tumor, malignant melanotic nerve sheath tumor, formerly referred to as melanotic schwannoma. We also discuss the diagnostic relevance of these neoplasms to specific genetic and familial syndromes of nerve, including neurofibromatosis 1, neurofibromatosis 2, and schwannomatosis. In addition, we discuss updates in our understanding of the molecular alterations that represent key drivers of these neoplasms, including neurofibromatosis type 1 and type 2, SMARCB1, LZTR1, and PRKAR1A loss, as well as the acquisition of CDKN2A/B mutations and alterations in the polycomb repressor complex members (SUZ12 and EED) in the malignant progression to MPNST. In summary, this review covers practical aspects of pathologic diagnosis with updates relevant to neurosurgical practice.

Intrinsic peripheral nerve and root tumor and pseudotumoral lesions at a tertiary care pediatric hospital

PURPOSE

Tumors affecting peripheral nerves in children are rare. Accurate diagnosis ensures that management is appropriate and timely. A review of intrinsic nerve tumors was completed to differentiate common peripheral nerve lesions based on clinical characteristics and investigations.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted for children (< 18 years old) diagnosed with an intrinsic tumor affecting peripheral nerve(s) or roots at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) from 2009 to 2019.

RESULTS

We report 14 children with perineurioma (N = 6), neurofibroma (N = 4), intraneural ganglion cyst (N = 2), or lipomatosis (N = 2). Mean age of symptom onset was 8.2 years (range 0.3 to 17.3 years). Presenting symptoms included muscle weakness (7/14), painless muscle wasting (2/14), contracture (1/14), pain (1/14), or the identification of a painless mass (3/14). Nerve conduction studies (NCS) or electromyography (EMG) were performed in 11/14 patients. MRI was useful at differentiating between these pediatric nerve tumors. Biopsies were performed in nine patients with additional surgical management pursued in four patients.

CONCLUSION

The rare nature of peripheral nerve tumors in children can pose diagnostic challenges. NCS/EMG are important to assist with localization, and MRI is useful to distinguish more benign tumors. Key MRI, clinical, and NCS features can in some cases guide management, potentially avoiding the need for invasive procedures.

Focal chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Onset, course, and distinct features

Focal chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is defined as involving the brachial or lumbosacral plexus, or one or more peripheral nerves in one upper or one lower limb (monomelic distribution). However, other auto-immune neuropathies such as Lewis-Sumner syndrome (LSS) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) can also have a focal onset. From a retrospective cohort of 30 focal CIDP patients with a monomelic onset dating back at least 2 years, we distinguished patients with plexus involvement (focal demyelinating plexus neuropathy [F-PN], n = 18) from those with sensory or sensorimotor (F-SMN, n = 7), or purely motor (F-MN, n = 5) impairment located in one or several peripheral nerves. Few (39%) F-PN patients had motor nerve conduction abnormalities, but the majority showed proximal conduction abnormalities in somatosensory evoked potentials (80%), and all had focal hypertrophy and/or increased short tau inversion recovery image signal intensity on plexus MRI. Impairment remained monomelic in most (94%) F-PN patients, whereas abnormalities developed in other limbs in 57% of F-SMN, and 40% of F-MN patients (P = .015). The prognosis of F-PN patients was significantly better: none had an ONLS score > 2 at the final follow-up visit, vs 43% of F-SMN patients and 40% of F-MN patients (P = .026). Our findings from a large cohort of focal CIDP patients confirm the existence of different entities that are typically categorized under this one term: on the one hand, patients with a focal plexus neuropathy and on the other, patients with monomelic sensori-motor or motor involvement of peripheral nerves. These two last subgroups appeared to be more likely to evolve to LSS or MMN phenotype, when F-PN patients have a more distinctive long-term, focal, benign course.

Intraneural perineurioma of the median nerve at the elbow: A clinical case

A 31-year-old female patient presented with swelling on the anteromedial aspect of her right elbow with a sensory deficit in the median nerve territory. Biopsies led to the diagnosis of intraneural perineurioma (INP). Surgical excision was performed and followed by an intercalary graft. INP is a rare benign tumor of the peripheral nerves characterized by a multiplication of perineural cells invading the endoneurium. This lesion is often unknown, under-diagnosed, and its treatment is poorly defined. Few cases have been described in the literature; the majority involve the median nerve at the wrist and no references have been found about its localization to the median nerve at the elbow.

Peripheral nerve tumors of the hand: Clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment

The majority of the tumors arising from the peripheral nerves of the hand are relatively benign. However, a tumor diagnosed as malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) has destructive consequences. Clinical signs and symptoms are usually caused by direct and indirect effects of the tumor, such as nerve invasion or compression and infiltration of surrounding tissues. Definitive diagnosis is made by tumor biopsy. Complete surgical removal with maximum reservation of residual neurologic function is the most appropriate intervention for most symptomatic benign peripheral nerve tumors (PNTs) of the hand; however, MPNSTs require surgical resection with a sufficiently wide margin or even amputation to improve prognosis. In this article, we review the clinical presentation and radiographic features, summarize the evidence for an accurate diagnosis, and discuss the available treatment options for PNTs of the hand.

[Informative value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of intraneural perineurioma]

OBJECTIVE

To describe clinical and sonographic features of confirmed intraneural perineurioma in 5 patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We report clinical and sonographic features and retrospective follow-up data in 5 patients with intraneural perineurioma verified by biopsy.

RESULTS

In all cases, symptoms were represented by a slowly progressive painless mononeuropathy with muscle atrophy and impaired tendon reflexes. Ultrasound examination revealed locally enlarged cross-sectional area of the nerve that was confirmed by intraoperative visualization.

CONCLUSION

Intraneural perineurioma should be obligatory suspected in case of fusiform thickening of the nerve with locally changed echogenicity. Pooled multiple-center studies with large samples are needed to determine sensitivity and specificity of the main ultrasound parameters including changes in cross-sectional area and echogenicity of the nerve.

Association of intraneural perineurioma with neurofibromatosis type 2

BACKGROUND

Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is a genetic disorder characterized by mutations of the NF2 tumor suppressor gene that predisposes patients to develop multiple tumors in the peripheral and central nervous system. The most common neoplasms associated with the disease are schwannomas and meningiomas. Both have been shown to contain abnormalities in chromosome 22 and the NF2 gene, suggesting a genetic component to their pathogenesis. Perineuriomas are rare benign tumors arising from the perineural cells. They are commonly classified as intraneural and soft tissue perineuriomas. Several studies have reported mutations in genes on chromosome 22 in both types of perineuriomas, and there are reports of soft tissue perineuriomas associated with NF2 gene mutations. Despite this, perineuriomas are not considered as part of the NF2 constellation of tumors.

METHOD

The electronic medical records were searched for patients with a radiologic or pathologic diagnosis of intraneural perineurioma. Patients with clinical signs and genetic testing consistent with a diagnosis of NF2 were further evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 112 patients meeting inclusion criteria, there were two cases of intraneural perineurioma in patients with NF2 treated at our institution (1.8%). We include a third patient treated at another facility for whom we performed a virtual consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

The rarity of both NF2 and perineuriomas could explain the rarity of perineuriomas in the setting of NF2. Furthermore, there is divergent intraneural and soft tissue perineurioma somatic mutation pathogenesis, and there may be cytogenetic overlap between perineuriomas and multiple tumor syndromes. Our observed occurrence of intraneural perineurioma in the setting of NF2 in several patients provides further evidence of a potential link between the NF2 gene and the development of intraneural perineurioma.

Limb Undergrowth in Intraneural Perineuriomas: An Under-Recognized Association

BACKGROUND

Intraneural (IN) perineuriomas are a rare benign hypertrophic nerve tumor, most frequently occurring in young patients. Patients with IN perineurioma have been anecdotally found to have limb undergrowth; however, this has not been systematically evaluated.

METHODS

Archived electronic records from 1990 to 2018 from a single institution were reviewed for pathology or radiology reports documenting a diagnosis of IN perineurioma. This identified 111 patients; 3 patients with IN perineurioma of cranial nerves were excluded. We further reviewed the 108 patients and identified those with a documented limb length discrepancy (LLD) or hand/foot size discrepancy (HFD) and tried to correlate findings with nerve-territory distribution.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven (25.0%) patients had either LLD or HFD. Nine patients had only an LLD, 6 patients had only an HFD, and 12 patients had both. Patients with undergrowth were significantly younger at diagnosis than patients without (6.14 vs. 22.9 years, respectively). Although there was a trend toward a greater incidence of LLD in lower extremity IN perineuriomas, this was not statistically significant. Patients with proximal IN perineuriomas had a higher incidence of LLD or HFD than patients with distal IN perineuriomas. The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). All instances of undergrowth were explained by nerve-territory bone innervation.

CONCLUSIONS

Limb undergrowth occurs in the affected nerve territory and is likely under-reported in patients with IN perineuriomas. Within our series, patients with documented LLD and HFD were likely to be significantly younger at diagnosis than patients without undergrowth.

Clinical and Radiological Follow-up of Intraneural Perineuriomas

BACKGROUND

Management of intraneural perineuriomas remains controversial, largely due to the lack of knowledge regarding the natural history of these lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the typical radiological growth pattern of intraneural perineuriomas and to determine how the pattern of growth relates to clinical progression.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies and serial clinical examinations of a cohort of patients with biopsy-proven intraneural perineuriomas who had 2 MRI studies at least 2 yr apart. The outcome of interest was radiological growth in length or width of the intraneural perineurioma. Radiological growth was tested for association with clinical progression.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included in the study. By width, the lesions were on average larger on repeat imaging (P = .009). By absolute length, the lesions were on average longer on repeat imaging (P = .02). By lesion:landmark ratio, there was no difference in length of the lesions between sequential images (P = .09), with 10 (50%) lesions being shorter and 7 (35%) showing no change. No lesions grew to involve a new nerve or division of a nerve on sequential imaging. None of the variables tested were associated with clinical progression.

CONCLUSION

We found that intraneural perineuriomas only rarely grow in length, do not grow to involve new nerves or nerve divisions, and growth does not correlate with clinical progression. These findings have significant ramifications for management of these tumors.

Modern treatment of perineuriomas: a case-series and systematic review

Background

Perineuriomas are rare benign peripheral nerve sheath tumours of perineurial cell origin and can be classified into intraneural and extraneural perineuriomas. They most commonly present a mononeuropathy of gradual onset and slow progression, resulting in progressive neurological deficits like hypoesthesia or motor weakness. Therapy is still variable. Aim of the study was to compare our surgical treatment and our follow-up regime including high-resolution nerve sonography with the current literature to evaluate best treatment of perineuriomas.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of our dataset “peripheral nerve lesion” to identify patients suffering from perineuriomas between 01.01.2012 until 31.12.2018. Surgical treatment and the follow-up examination of three patients were described. Additionally, a systematic review including PubMed, the Cochrane Collaboration Library, Scopus and Google Scholar was performed for literature published between January 1, 1990 and October 31, 2019 independently by 2 authors.

Results

In the first case, the left ulnar nerve was affected. In the second case, the left peroneal nerve and in the third case the right median nerve was affected. High-resolution nerve sonography was performed in each case. All patients underwent interfascicular neurolysis combined with a targeted fascicular biopsy under electrophysiological monitoring. Neurological deficits improved subsidized by rehabilitation. Surgical therapy and the neurological outcome were compared with literature. Systematic review revealed 22 articles, which met the inclusion criteria. Therefore, demographics, surgical treatment and neurological outcome of 77 patients were analysed.

Conclusions

Perineuriomas are rare benign nerve sheath tumours with a slow progression, sometimes difficult to diagnose. Decompression and neurolysis may improve neurological deficits. High resolution nerve sonography might serve as a helpful additional diagnostic tool in this process.

Sodium Fluorescein as Intraoperative Visualization Tool During Peripheral Nerve Biopsies

OBJECTIVE

Owing to technical development of specific fluorophore filters, the neurosurgical application of sodium fluorescein (SF) has regained value in brain tumor surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of SF during nerve biopsies.

METHODS

This single-center study included 5 cases of nerve biopsies performed under microscope-based fluorescence with SF performed between March 2016 and February 2017. SF was applied intravenously (1 mg/kg body weight). After microsurgical dissection of the involved nerve segment, fluorescence-guided fascicular biopsy was performed. Selection of target fascicles was at the surgeon's discretion and took into account nerve stimulation for preservation of motor function and fluorescence intensity. Correlation to histopathologic examination was examined. Video analysis of intraoperative images comparing target fascicles with intense fluorescent response to adjacent fascicles of the same nerve segment was performed using ImageJ.

RESULTS

All patients had motor or sensory deficits. Magnetic resonance imaging findings were similar, depicting long segments of gadolinium enhancement (minimum 11.7 cm). Each biopsy sample was positive resulting in diverse histopathologic results. Digital image analysis revealed a statistically significant difference of the complementary color green (P = 0.0473).

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard in diagnostic work-up of peripheral nerve disorders. Longitudinal nerve thickening with positive contrast enhancement is an unspecific magnetic resonance imaging finding. Various pathologies, such as tumors and inflammatory lesions, may cause this morphologic phenomenon. Nerve biopsies may be needed for diagnostic work-up. Intraoperative SF may help to depict the most affected fascicles and identify target fascicles for biopsy and increase diagnostic certainty of nerve biopsies.

Intraneural perineurioma: a retrospective study of 19 patients

Intraneural perineurioma is a benign neoplasm of peripheral nerve sheath with perineurial cell origin that typically affects teenagers and young adults and tends to result in a motor-predominant neuropathy. The aim of our study is to present the epidemiology, clinical presentation, way of diagnosis and management plan in a consecutive patient series. Ninteen patients diagnosed as having intraneural perineurioma were retrospectively chart reviewed. Diagnosis was done by MRI and/or biopsy with morphological, immunohistochemical staining study confirmation. Patients assessments included gender, age, symptoms, tumor localization, radiological aspect, management and pathological confirmation.Sex ratio was 10 males to 9 females with mean age of 31.2 (15-64). All the patients presented with motor deficit, ten with sensory deficit. Upper limb was involved in 11 cases (among them 4 lesions of brachial plexus), the lower limb in 8 cases. On magnetic resonance imaging, 16 patients showed a nerve enlargement whereas 5 presented with atypical fusiform tumor. Eighteen patients were operated for excision biopsy and/or palliative treatment for their motor deficit. Anatomopathological analysis confirmed the diagnosis in seventeen cases with a morphological pseudo-onion bulb shape and/or specific immunohistochemical assay. One patient had only palliative treatment without excision biopsy. Our data confirmed the equal penetration of intraneural perineurioma to both sex and affected limb. Because of the benignity of the tumor, the surgical treatment focused on optimizing the functional outcome. A prospective study with long term follow-up is required for this under-diagnosed tumor.

Clinicoradiological features of intraneural perineuriomas obviate the need for tissue diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to define a set of clinicoradiological parameters with a high specificity for the diagnosis of intraneural perineurioma, obviating the need for operative tissue diagnosis.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed MR images obtained in a large cohort of patients who underwent targeted fascicular biopsy and included only those patients for whom the biopsy yielded a diagnosis. Clinical and radiological findings were then tested for their ability to predict a tissue diagnosis of intraneural perineurioma. The authors propose a new set of diagnostic criteria, referred to as the Perineurioma Diagnostic Criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of several clinicoradiological methods of diagnosis were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients who underwent targeted fascicular biopsy were included in the cohort, of whom 51 had a tissue diagnosis of intraneural perineurioma. When the clinicoradiological methods used in this study were compared, the highest sensitivity (0.86), negative predictive value (0.95), and F1 score (0.88) were observed for the decision trees generated in C5.0 and rPart, whereas the highest specificity (1.0) and positive predictive value (1.0) were observed for the Perineurioma Diagnostic Criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified clinical and radiological features that are associated with a diagnosis of perineurioma. The Perineurioma Diagnostic Criteria were determined to be the following: 1) no cancer history, 2) unifocal disease, 3) moderate to severe hyperintensity on T2-weighted MR images, 4) moderate to severe contrast enhancement, 5) homogeneous contrast enhancement, 6) fusiform shape, 7) enlargement of the involved nerves, and 8) age ≤ 40 years. Use of the Perineurioma Diagnostic Criteria obviates the need for tissue diagnosis when all of the criteria are satisfied.

Intraneural perineuriomas: diagnostic value of magnetic resonance neurography

Intraneural perineurioma (IP) is an under-recognized hypertrophic peripheral nerve tumor. It affects young patients involving frequently the sciatic nerve and its branches and presents with a progressive, painless and predominantly motor deficit. Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is a useful tool to localize the lesion, evaluate its extension, and discriminate between different etiologies. We reviewed the clinical records of 11 patients with pathologically confirm IP. Eight patients were males with mean age 19 years. Initial complains were unilateral steppage (seven patients), bilateral steppage (one patient), unilateral gastrocnemius wasting (one patient), unilateral thigh atrophy (one patient), and unilateral hand weakness (one patient). Nine patients had mild painless sensory loss. Examinations revealed involvement of sciatic nerve extending into the peroneal nerve (eight patients), posterior tibial nerve (one patient), radial nerve (one patient), and femoral nerve (one patient). MRN revealed enlargement of the affected nerve isointense on T1-weighted, hyperintense on T2 fat-saturated images, and with avid enhancement on post-contrast imaging. In all patients, a nerve biopsy confirmed the diagnosis. MRN allows early and non-invasive identification of this tumor and is a key tool providing localization and differential diagnosis in patients with slowly progressive focal neuropathies.