Modulation of aflatoxin-B1 hepatocarcinogenesis in trout by dehydroepiandrosterone: initiation/post-initiation and latency effects

The rainbow trout liver cancer model: response to environmental chemicals and studies on promotion and chemoprevention

Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) are an outstanding model of liver cancer induction by environmental chemicals and development of strategies for chemoprevention. Trout have critical and unique advantages allowing for cancer studies with 40,000 animals to determine dose-response at levels orders of magnitude lower than possible in rodents. Examples of two promoters in this model, the dietary supplement dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and industrial chemical perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), are presented. In addition, indole-3-carbinol (I3C) and chlorophyllin (CHL) inhibit initiation following exposure to potent human chemical carcinogens (e.g., aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1))). Two "ED(001)" cancer studies have been conducted, utilizing approximately 40,000 trout, by dietary exposure to AFB(1) and dibenzo[d,e,f,p]chrysene (DBC). These studies represent the two largest cancer studies ever performed and expand the dose-response dataset generated by the 25,000 mouse "ED(01)" study over an order of magnitude. With DBC, the liver tumor response fell well below the LED(10) line, often used for risk assessment, even though the biomarker (liver DBC-DNA adducts) remained linear. Conversely, the response with AFB(1) remained relatively linear throughout the entire dose range. These contributions to elucidation of mechanisms of liver cancer, induced by environmental chemicals and the remarkable datasets generated with ED(001) studies, make important contributions to carcinogenesis and chemoprevention.

Resolving mechanisms of toxicity while pursuing ecotoxicological relevance?

In this age of modern biology, aquatic toxicological research has pursued mechanisms of action of toxicants. This has provided potential tools for ecotoxicologic investigations. However, problems of biocomplexity and issues at higher levels of biological organization remain a challenge. In the 1980s and 1990s and continuing to a lesser extent today, organisms residing in highly contaminated field sites or exposed in the laboratory to calibrated concentrations of individual compounds were carefully analyzed for their responses to priority pollutants. Correlation of biochemical and structural analyses in cultured cells and tissues, as well as the in vivo exposures led to the production and application of biomarkers of exposure and effect and to our awareness of genotoxicity and its chronic manifestations, such as neoplasms, in wild fishes. To gain acceptance of these findings in the greater environmental toxicology community, "validation of the model" versus other, better-established often rodent models, was necessary and became a major focus. Resultant biomarkers were applied to heavily contaminated and reference field sites as part of effects assessment and with investigations following large-scale disasters such as oil spills or industrial accidents. Over the past 15 years, in the laboratory, small aquarium fish models such as medaka (Oryzias latipes), zebrafish (Danio rerio), platyfish (Xiphophorus species), fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas), and sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus) were increasingly used establishing mechanisms of toxicants. Today, the same organisms provide reliable information at higher levels of biological organization relevant to ecotoxicology. We review studies resolving mechanisms of toxicity and discuss ways to address biocomplexity, mixtures of contaminants, and the need to relate individual level responses to populations and communities.

Induction and modulation of hepatic preneoplasia and neoplasia in the rat by dehydroepiandrosterone

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), the main adrenal steroid in humans and a precursor in androgen and estrogen biosynthesis, acts as a peroxisome proliferator and as a hepatocarcinogen in rats. Neoplasms emerge from a glycogenotic/amphophilic/basophilic preneoplastic cell lineage. A higher female tumor incidence suggests a relevant influence of sex hormones. DHEA enhances hepatocarcinogenesis induced by N-nitrosomorpholine (NNM), which is characterized by the glycogenotic/basophilic cell lineage. The tumor promoting effect is related to an additional amphophilic/basophilic preneoplastic lesion sequence and to faster proliferation of the basophilic preneoplastic lesions. Nevertheless, hepatocellular carcinomas provided under DHEA treatment seem to have a less malignant phenotype compared to tumors induced by NNM only. Further, DHEA treatment reduces growth and generation of glycogen storage foci (GSF) in initial NNM-treated rats. Thus, DHEA treatment results in both, a growth stimulation of the late basophilic lesion type with an additional amphophilic lesion sequence, and in a growth inhibition of early preneoplastic lesions, addressing especially GSF. DHEA also inhibits the growth of physiologically proliferating liver tissue. This might be explained by a DHEA related cellular metabolism, which results in significant energy consumption. Additionally, a DHEA-induced alteration of cytokine levels might contribute to this growth inhibition as well.

The non-aromatizable androgen, dihydrotestosterone, induces antiestrogenic responses in the rainbow trout

In order to satisfy government mandates, numerous studies have been performed categorizing potential endocrine disrupting chemicals as (anti)estrogens or (anti)androgens. We report here that dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a potent, non-aromatizable androgen receptor agonist, induces antiestrogenic responses through direct and/or indirect modulation of vitellogenin (Vg), steroid hormone and total cytochrome P450 levels. DHT and two weak, aromatizable androgens, DHEA and androstenedione (0.05-50 mg/kg per day), were fed to juvenile trout for 2 weeks. DHEA and androstenedione significantly increased blood plasma Vg by up to 30- and 45-fold, respectively (P<0.05, t-test). 17beta-Estradiol (E2) increases were also observed with both androgens, albeit with lower sensitivity. DHT markedly decreased Vg and E2 levels, suggesting that DHEA and androstenedione increased Vg and E2 via conversion to E2 and not by estrogen receptor agonism. DHEA and androstenedione had no effect on total cytochrome P450 content, while DHT significantly decreased P450 content in a dose dependent fashion. These results indicate that alterations in metabolism mediated by androgen receptor binding may be responsible for the Vg and E2 decreases by DHT. In an attempt to decipher between receptor and non-receptor androgenic mechanisms of the observed DHT effects, DHT (0, 50 or 100 mg/kg per day) and flutamide (0-1250 mg/kg per day), an androgen receptor antagonist, were fed to juvenile rainbow trout for 2 weeks. Flutamide alone was as effective as DHT in decreasing E2 and Vg levels in males but did not significantly reverse DHT induced Vg decreases in either sex (P>0.05, F-test). DHT decreases in total P450 content were partially attenuated in males by flutamide co-treatment, but not females, suggesting a partial androgenic mechanism to the P450 decreases as well as a fundamental sex difference responding to androgen receptor binding. Moreover, flutamide alone decreased P450 content by up to 30% in males and 40% in females. These effects may be mediated through direct androgen receptor binding irrespective of whether the binding is agonistic or antagonistic. This study indicates that androgen receptor agonists/antagonists can elicit significant antiestrogenic effects that may not necessarily be mediated through classic receptor binding mechanisms and signal transduction pathways.

Rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, as a model for aromatase inhibition

The feasibility of utilizing rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, as an alternative model for studying the inhibition of aromatase (CYP 19) was investigated. The suppression of estrogen-dependent tumors by aromatase inhibitors has been important in the treatment of breast cancer. Estrogens, estrogen precursors and xenoestrogens have been found to promote liver cancer in the trout model. A steroid, 4-hydroxy-4-androstene-3,17-dione (4-OHA), and non-steroids, aminoglutethimide (AG) and Letrozole (CGS 20267), all of which are known aromatase inhibitors in rats and humans, were examined in vitro for activity in trout ovarian microsomes. Aromatase activity was quantified as the release of 3H2O from the conversion of [3H]-4-androstene-3,17-dione to 17beta-estradiol and estrone. Trout ovarian microsomes exhibited activity between 39-60 fmol mg(-1) min(-1) with a calculated Vmax of 71.1 fmol mg(-1) min(-1) when incubated at 25 degrees C with 200 nM 4-androstene-3,17-dione (K(M) = 435 nM). Significant inhibition by 4-OHA up to 80% was seen at 1.5 microM. At 2000 microM, AG decreased aromatase activity by up to 82%. Letrozole reduced aromatase activity a maximum of 90% in a dose-dependent manner, but the Ki (2.3 microM) was 1000-fold higher than reported in human trials. Indole-3-carbinol and some of its derivatives, two DDE isomers and four flavones (except alpha-naphthoflavone) at 1000 microM did not significantly inhibit aromatase in vitro. Letrozole and clotrimazole, fed to juvenile rainbow trout at doses up to 1000 ppm for 2 weeks, were not effective in suppressing dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) induced increases in vitellogenin and 17beta-estradiol levels. These results document that trout aromatase is sensitive to inhibition in vitro by known inhibitors of the mammalian enzyme. The mechanism(s) for lack of inhibition in vivo is currently unknown and must be further investigated in order to develop a trout model for studying the role of aromatase in carcinogenesis.