Evolution and Transmission of Cefiderocol-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii During an Outbreak in the Burn Intensive Care Unit

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii carrying various β-lactamase encoding genes

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the in vitro efficacy of cefiderocol in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) isolates and evaluate the disk-diffusion (DD) method as an alternative method to broth-microdilution (BMD).

METHODS

Totally 89 CRAB isolates were included. Cluster analysis was determined by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE). Resistance genes; blaOXA-51, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-24, blaOXA-58,blaPER-1, blaNDM, blaIMP and mcr-1 were screened. Cefiderocol susceptibility testing was performed by both DD and BMD. Interpretation was made according to EUCAST and CLSI. Categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (mEs), major errors (MEs), and very major errors (VMEs) were determined.

RESULTS

PFGE revealed 5 distinct pulsotypes; 86 of the isolates were extensively drug-resistant (XDR). All the isolates were negative for blaNDM, blaIMP, mcr-1, while positive for blaOXA-58 and blaOXA51. blaPER-1 was positive for 33.7%; blaOXA-23 for 74.2%; blaOXA-24 for 12.3%. According to CLSI, the MEs rate was 1.85%, mEs was 7.86% and there were no VMEs. According to EUCAST, MEs rate was 3.70%, there were no mEs and VMEs. CA was 91% for CLSI and 97.8% for EUCAST. MICs of cefiderocol against A. baumannii isolates ranged from 0.06 to > 128 mg/L, with MIC50 and MIC90 values of 0.5 and > 128 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol susceptibility was 60.7% in CRAB isolates. MIC50, MIC90 of blaPER-1 positive and blaPER-1 negative groups were > 128/>128 and 0.25/>128 mg/L. A correlation between the presence of blaPER-1 and cefiderocol resistance was observed (p < 0.0001). Among colistin-resistant isolates, the presence of blaPER-1 was 47.1% and 75% of them were resistant to cefiderocol respectively.

Treatment-emergent cefiderocol resistance in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii is associated with insertion sequence ISAba36 in the siderophore receptor pirA

We report the emergence of cefiderocol resistance in a blaOXA-72 carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolate from a sacral decubitus ulcer. Cefiderocol was initially used; however, a newly approved sulbactam-durlobactam therapy with source control and flap coverage was successful in treating the infection. Laboratory investigation revealed cefiderocol resistance mediated by ISAba36 insertion into the siderophore receptor pirA.

Cefiderocol in Difficult-to-Treat Nf-GNB in ICU Settings

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of cefiderocol in ICU patients with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (Nf-GNB) are not as well-established. Consequently, we conducted a cohort study to compare Cefiderocol with the Best Available Therapy (BAT) in ICU patients.

METHODS

We included adult patients from 9 different ICUs, including a burn ICU unit, from 2019 to 2023 treated with Cefiderocol for DTR Nf-GNB isolated from the blood or lungs. We matched each patient at a 1:2 ratio based on the same DTR Nf-GBN isolated pathogen, and when possible, within the same type of ICU (burn unit or not). The primary endpoint of the study was the clinical cure at 15 days, with secondary endpoints including clinical cure at 30 days, relapse, and in-ICU mortality. For each outcome, adjusted odds ratios were estimated using bidirectional stepwise regression in a final model, which included 13 preselected confounders.

RESULTS

We included 27 patients with cefiderocol, matched with 54 patients receiving the BAT. Four patients were not exactly matched on the type of ICU unit. Characteristics were comparable between groups, mostly male with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 3 [1-5], and 28% had immunosuppression. Cefiderocol patients were most likely to have higher number of antibiotic lines. The main DTR Nf-GNB identified was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (81.5%), followed by Acinetobater baumanii (14.8%) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (3.7%). Pneumonia was the identified infection in 21 (78.8%) patients in the Cefiderocol group and in 51 (94.4%) patients in the BAT group (p = 0.054). Clinical cure at 15 and 30-day and the in-ICU mortality was comparable between groups, however relapse was higher in the cefiderocol group (8-29.6% vs. 4-7.4%;aOR 10.06[1.96;51.53]) CONCLUSION: Cefiderocol did not show an improvement in clinical cure or mortality rates compared to BAT in the treatment of DTR Nf-GNB, but it was associated with a higher relapse rate.

Evolution, control and success of combination therapy with Ampicilin-sulbactam/Ceftazidime-Avibactam during a Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii outbreak in burn Intensive Care Unit

We present our findings on interpatient transmission, epidemic control measures, and the outcomes of a series of ten critically ill burn patients who were either colonized or infected with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). None of the five infected patients achieved clinical cure, and all experienced relapses. Microbiological failure was observed in 40% of the infected patients. The isolated CRAB strains were found to carry blaOXA-23 and armA resistance genes. Despite the lack of clinical cure, all five infected patients survived and were discharged from the Burn Intensive Care Unit.

The Prediction of LptA and LptC Protein-Protein Interactions and Virtual Screening for Potential Inhibitors

Antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria remains one of the most pressing challenges to global public health. Blocking the transportation of lipopolysaccharides (LPS), a crucial component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, is considered a promising strategy for drug discovery. In the transportation process of LPS, two components of the LPS transport (Lpt) complex, LptA and LptC, are responsible for shuttling LPS across the periplasm to the outer membrane, highlighting their potential as targets for antibacterial drug development. In the current study, a protein-protein interaction (PPI) model of LptA and LptC was constructed, and a molecular screening strategy was employed to search a protein-protein interaction compound library. The screening results indicated that compound 18593 exhibits favorable binding free energy with LptA and LptC. In comparison with the molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on currently known inhibitors, compound 18593 shows more stable target binding ability at the same level. The current study suggests that compound 18593 may exhibit an inhibitory effect on the LPS transport process, making it a promising hit compound for further research.

Specificity and mechanism of TonB-dependent ferric catecholate uptake by Fiu

We studied the Escherichia coli outer membrane protein Fiu, a presumed transporter of monomeric ferric catecholates, by introducing Cys residues in its surface loops and modifying them with fluorescein maleimide (FM). Fiu-FM bound iron complexes of the tricatecholate siderophore enterobactin (FeEnt) and glucosylated enterobactin (FeGEnt), their dicatecholate degradation product Fe(DHBS)2 (FeEnt*), the monocatecholates dihydroxybenzoic acid (FeDHBA) and dihydroxybenzoyl serine (FeDHBS), and the siderophore antibiotics cefiderocol (FDC) and MB-1. Unlike high-affinity ligand-gated porins (LGPs), Fiu-FM had only micromolar affinity for iron complexes. Its apparent KD values for FeDHBS, FeDHBA, FeEnt*, FeEnt, FeGEnt, FeFDC, and FeMB-1 were 0.1, 0.7, 0.7, 1.0, 0.3, 0.4, and 4 μM, respectively. Despite its broad binding abilities, the transport repertoires of E. coli Fiu, as well as those of Cir and FepA, were less broad. Fiu only transported FeEnt*. Cir transported FeEnt* and FeDHBS (weakly); FepA transported FeEnt, FeEnt*, and FeDHBA. Both Cir and FepA bound FeGEnt, albeit with lower affinity. Related transporters of Acinetobacter baumannii (PiuA, PirA, BauA) had similarly moderate affinity and broad specificity for di- or monomeric ferric catecholates. Both microbiological and radioisotopic experiments showed Fiu's exclusive transport of FeEnt*, rather than ferric monocatecholate compounds. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations predicted three binding sites for FeEnt*in the external vestibule of Fiu, and a fourth site deeper in its interior. Alanine scanning mutagenesis in the outermost sites (1a, 1b, and 2) decreased FeEnt* binding affinity as much as 20-fold and reduced or eliminated FeEnt* uptake. Finally, the molecular dynamics simulations suggested a pathway of FeEnt* movement through Fiu that may generally describe the process of metal transport by TonB-dependent receptors.

Cefiderocol either in monotherapy or combination versus best available therapy in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The best treatment for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections is still a matter of debate.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the outcomes of patients treated with cefiderocol for CRAB infections, and to compare the efficacy of cefiderocol versus best available therapy (BAT).

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE to screen original reports published up to September 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating 30-day mortality, clinical failure, microbiological failure or rate of adverse drug reactions of patients treated with cefiderocol or BAT.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with infections due to CRAB.

INTERVENTIONS

Cefiderocol in monotherapy or in combination with other potentially active agents or BAT.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs, and the Newcastle Ottawa scale for observational studies.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

We conducted a meta-analysis pooling risk ratios (RRs) through random effect models.

RESULTS

We screened 801 original reports, and 18 studies (2 RCTs, 13 cohort studies and 3 case-series) were included in the analysis, for a total 733 patients treated with cefiderocol, and 473 receiving the BAT. Among patients receiving cefiderocol, the 30-day mortality rate was 42% (95% CI 38-47%), the rate of microbiological failure 48% (95% CI 31-65%), the clinical failure rate 43% (95% CI 32-55%), and the rate of ADRs was 3% (95% CI 1-6%). A lower mortality rate was observed among patients receiving cefiderocol monotherapy as compared to those treated with combination regimens (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.43-0.94, p = 0.024). We found a significantly lower mortality rate (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.95, p = 0.02) and a lower rate of ADRs (RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.09-0.91, p = 0.03) in the group treated with cefiderocol as compared to BAT. No difference was observed in microbiological and clinical failure rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data strengthen the efficacy and safety profile of cefiderocol in CRAB infections.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparator antibiotics against multidrug-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli

Background

This study evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, and aztreonam/avibactam against clinically important multidrug-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli.

Methods

Bacteraemic isolates of 126 multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDRAB), 110 imipenem-resistant Pseudamoas aeruginosa [including 14 difficult-to-treat resistant P. aeruginosa (DTRPA)], 45 beta-lactam-non-susceptible Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC), 47 levofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-non-susceptible Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and 22 ciprofloxacin-non-susceptible Elizabethkingia spp. collected between 2019 and 2021 were subjected to MIC determination for cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam/avibactam.

Results

The MIC50/90s of cefiderocol for drug-resistant A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, BCC, S. maltophilia and Elizabethkingia spp. were 0.25/2, 0.25/1, ≤0.06/≤0.06, ≤0.06/0.25 and >32/>32 mg/L, respectively. Cefiderocol inhibited 94.4% (119/126) of MDRAB, 100% of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, 100% of DTRPA and 100% of BCC at an MIC ≤4 mg/L, and 97.9% (46/47) of S. maltophilia at ≤1 mg/L. Ceftazidime/avibactam inhibited 76.4% (84/110) of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, 21.4% (3/14) of DTRPA and 68.9% (31/45) of BCC at an MIC ≤8 mg/L. Aztreonam/avibactam had MIC50/90s of 16/>32, 8/16 and 4/8 mg/L for imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, BCC and S. maltophilia, respectively. At ≤8 mg/L, aztreonam/avibactam inhibited 7.1% (1/14) of DTRPA and 93.6% (44/47) of S. maltophilia isolates. Elizabethkingia spp. demonstrated high MICs for cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam/avibactam, with all MIC50s and MIC90s > 32 mg/L.

Conclusion

Cefiderocol may serve as an alternative treatment for multidrug-resistant A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, BCC and S. maltophilia when other antibiotics have been ineffective or intolerable. The role of ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam/avibactam in the management of BCC or S. maltophilia infections warrants further investigation.

The emergence of cefiderocol resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa from a heteroresistant isolate during prolonged therapy

Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin designed to target multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Previously, the emergence of cefiderocol non-susceptibility has been associated with mutations in the chromosomal cephalosporinase (PDC) along with mutations in the PirA and PiuA/D TonB-dependent receptor pathways. Here, we report a clinical case of cefiderocol-resistant P. aeruginosa that emerged in a patient during treatment. This resistance was associated with mutations not previously reported, suggesting potential novel pathways to cefiderocol resistance.

Cefiderocol and Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) remain a clinical challenge due to limited treatment options. Recently, cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, and sulbactam-durlobactam, a bactericidal β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of A. baumannii infections. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action of and resistance to cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam, the antimicrobial susceptibility of A. baumannii isolates to these drugs, as well as the clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol and sulbactam/durlobactam-based regimens against CRAB. Overall, cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam show an excellent antimicrobial activity against CRAB. The review of clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of cefiderocol therapy against CRAB indicates it is non-inferior to colistin/other treatments for CRAB infections, with a better safety profile. Combination treatment is not associated with improved outcomes compared to monotherapy. Higher mortality rates are often associated with prior patient comorbidities and the severity of the underlying infection. Regarding sulbactam-durlobactam, current data from the pivotal clinical trial and case reports suggest this antibiotic combination could be a valuable option in critically ill patients affected by CRAB infections, in particular where no other antibiotic appears to be effective.

Co-regulation of biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: from mechanisms to therapeutic strategies

In recent years, multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged globally as a major threat to the healthcare system. It is now listed by the World Health Organization as a priority one for the need of new therapeutic agents. A. baumannii has the capacity to develop robust biofilms on biotic and abiotic surfaces. Biofilm development allows these bacteria to resist various environmental stressors, including antibiotics and lack of nutrients or water, which in turn allows the persistence of A. baumannii in the hospital environment and further outbreaks. Investigation into therapeutic alternatives that will act on both biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is sorely needed. The aim of the present review is to critically discuss the various mechanisms by which AMR and biofilm formation may be co-regulated in A. baumannii in an attempt to shed light on paths towards novel therapeutic opportunities. After discussing the clinical importance of A. baumannii, this critical review highlights biofilm-formation genes that may be associated with the co-regulation of AMR. Particularly worthy of consideration are genes regulating the quorum sensing system AbaI/AbaR, AbOmpA (OmpA protein), Bap (biofilm-associated protein), the two-component regulatory system BfmRS, the PER-1 β-lactamase, EpsA, and PTK. Finally, this review discusses ongoing experimental therapeutic strategies to fight A. baumannii infections, namely vaccine development, quorum sensing interference, nanoparticles, metal ions, natural products, antimicrobial peptides, and phage therapy. A better understanding of the mechanisms that co-regulate biofilm formation and AMR will help identify new therapeutic targets, as combined approaches may confer synergistic benefits for effective and safer treatments.

Rapid detection of cefiderocol susceptibility/resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii

PURPOSE

Due to its ability to disseminate worldwide and its multiple resistance trait, Acinetobacter baumannii is becoming a threat for public health worldwide. Cefiderocol (FDC) is a promising broad-spectrum cephalosporin recently approved for treating Gram-negative infection. The aim of this study was to develop a rapid test, namely the rapid FDC Acinetobacter baumannii NP test, for the detection of FDC susceptibility/resistance in A. baumannii since the current FDC susceptibility tests are rather time-consuming (at least 24 h).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The rapid test is based on the reduction of resazurin to resorufin product by bacterial viable cells, thus detecting bacterial growth in the presence of FDC (38.4 mg/L). A color change from blue (resazurin) to violet or pink (resorufin) represents visual detection of bacterial growth. 95 randomly selected A. baumannii isolates were used to evaluate the performance of the rapid FDC Acinetobacter baumannii NP test.

RESULTS

The test showed 95.5% (95% CI 78.2-99.2%) and 100.0% (95% CI 95.0-100.0%) of sensitivity and specificity, respectively. All the results were obtained within 4 h30-4 h45 incubation time at 35 °C ± 2 °C, saving virtually one day when compared with currently-used antimicrobial susceptibility tests. The test showed only a single very major error, an isolate with a MIC of 8 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

The rapid FDC Acinetobacter baumannii NP test can be a valuable method which is easier and faster to interpret when compared with the gold standard broth microdilution method. The test showed remarkable performances; hence, it may be suitable for implementation in clinical microbiology routine laboratories.

What is the clinical significance of 'heteroresistance' in nonfermenting Gram-negative strains?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to discuss the potential clinical significance of heteroresistance in nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (GNB).

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, heteroresistance has been considered potentially responsible for clinical failure in Acinetobacter baumannii infections. This raised a scientific debate, still open, about the potential clinical significance of heteroresistance in nonfermenting GNB.

SUMMARY

We reviewed the literature of last 20 years and found a limited number of studies evaluating the relationship between heteroresistance and clinical outcome in nonfermenting GNB. Unlike Gram-positive bacteria, heteroresistance is reported in a significant proportion of nonfermenting GNB with some studies describing it in all tested strains and for several antibiotics (including tigecycline, carbapenems, levofloxacin, cefiderocol, colistin). One important issue is the need for validated detection method since the population analysis profile test, that is considered the gold standard, requires high costs and time. Studies evaluating the correlation between heteroresistance and clinical outcome are contrasting and have several limitations. Although in-vitro detection of heteroresistance in nonfermenting GNB has not been associated with in-vivo treatment failure, its presence may suggest to prefer combination regimens instead monotherapy when treating infections by nonfermenters. Further studies are needed to clarify the clinical significance of heteroresistance.

Metallo-β-lactamase-mediated antimicrobial resistance and progress in inhibitor discovery

Resistance to β-lactam antibiotics is rapidly growing, substantially due to the spread of serine-β-lactamases (SBLs) and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), which efficiently catalyse β-lactam hydrolysis. Combinations of a β-lactam antibiotic with an SBL inhibitor have been clinically successful; however, no MBL inhibitors have been developed for clinical use. MBLs are a worrying resistance vector because they catalyse hydrolysis of all β-lactam antibiotic classes, except the monobactams, and they are being disseminated across many bacterial species worldwide. Here we review the classification, structures, substrate profiles, and inhibition mechanisms of MBLs, highlighting current clinical problems due to MBL-mediated resistance and progress in understanding and combating MBL-mediated resistance.

An Overview of Cefiderocol's Therapeutic Potential and Underlying Resistance Mechanisms

Antimicrobial resistance continues to increase globally and treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTT) infections, mostly associated with carbapenem-resistant (CR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, CR Acinetobacter baumannii, and CR- and third-generation-cephalosporins-resistant Enterobacterales remains a challenge for the clinician. The recent approval of cefiderocol has broaden the armamentarium for the treatment of patients with DTT infections. Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin that has shown excellent antibacterial activity, in part due to its innovative way of cell permeation. It is relatively stable compared to most commonly found carbapenamases. However, some resistant mechanisms to cefiderocol have already been identified and reduced susceptibility has developed during patient treatment, highlighting that the clinical use of cefiderocol must be rational. In this review, we summarize the current available treatments against the former resistant bacteria, and we revise and discuss the mechanism of action of cefiderocol, underlying the biological function of siderophores, the therapeutic potential of cefiderocol, and the mechanisms of resistance reported so far.

Treatment of critically ill patients with cefiderocol for infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens: review of the evidence

Appropriate antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with serious Gram-negative infections in the intensive care unit is crucial to minimize morbidity and mortality. Several new antibiotics have shown in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cefiderocol is the first approved siderophore beta-lactam antibiotic with potent activity against multidrug-resistant, carbapenem-resistant, difficult-to-treat or extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, which have limited treatment options. The spectrum of activity of cefiderocol includes drug-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii, P. aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter spp. and Burkholderia spp. and CRE that produce serine- and/or metallo-carbapenemases. Phase 1 studies established that cefiderocol achieves adequate concentration in the epithelial lining fluid in the lung and requires dosing adjustment for renal function, including patients with augmented renal clearance and continuous renal-replacement therapy (CRRT); no clinically significant drug-drug interactions are expected. The non-inferiority of cefiderocol versus high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem in all-cause mortality (ACM) rates at day 14 was demonstrated in the randomized, double-blind APEKS-NP Phase 3 clinical study in patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by suspected or confirmed Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, the efficacy of cefiderocol was investigated in the randomized, open-label, pathogen-focused, descriptive CREDIBLE-CR Phase 3 clinical study in its target patient population with serious carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections, including hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia, bloodstream infection/sepsis, or complicated urinary tract infections. However, a numerically greater ACM rate with cefiderocol compared with BAT led to the inclusion of a warning in US and European prescribing information. Cefiderocol susceptibility results obtained with commercial tests should be carefully evaluated due to current issues regarding their accuracy and reliability. Since its approval, real-world evidence in patients with multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections suggests that cefiderocol can be efficacious in certain critically ill patient groups, such as those requiring mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia with subsequently acquired Gram-negative bacterial superinfection, and patients with CRRT and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In this article, we review the microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety profiles and real-world evidence for cefiderocol, and look at future considerations for its role in the treatment of critically ill patients with challenging Gram-negative bacterial infections.

Salvage therapy with sulbactam/durlobactam against cefiderocol-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a critically ill burn patient: clinical challenges and molecular characterization

Background

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections are associated with high mortality rates. The optimal treatment regimen for CRAB has not been defined. Cefiderocol has been recently introduced in the armamentarium against CRAB but there is concern about treatment-emergent resistance. Since mortality rates in CRAB infections remain high, further antibiotic options are needed.

Methods

We report a case of severe infection by CRAB resistant to both colistin and cefiderocol treated with sulbactam/durlobactam and describe the molecular features of the strain. Susceptibility to cefiderocol was detected by disc diffusion according to EUCAST breakpoints. Susceptibility to sulbactam/durlobactam was determined by Etest according to preliminary breakpoints provided by Entasis Therapeutics. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) of the CRAB isolate was performed.

Results

A burn patient with ventilator-associated pneumonia by CRAB resistant to colistin and cefiderocol received sulbactam/durlobactam as compassionate use. She was alive after 30 days from the end of therapy. Complete microbiological eradication of CRAB was achieved. The isolate harboured bla_ADC-30, bla_OXA-23 and bla_OXA-66. A missense mutation in PBP3 was detected. The isolate harboured a mutation in the TonB-dependent siderophore receptor gene piuA that showed a frameshift mutation causing a premature stop codon (K384fs). Moreover, the fepA gene, which is orthologous to pirA, was interrupted by a transposon insertion P635-ISAba125 (IS30 family).

Conclusions

Further treatment options for severe infections by CRAB resistant to all available antibiotics are urgently needed. Sulbactam/durlobactam may be a future option against MDR A. baumannii.

Navigating Available Treatment Options for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex Infections

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (CRAB) is one of the top-priority pathogens for new antibiotic development. Unlike other antibiotic-resistant threats, none of the available therapies have been shown to consistently reduce mortality or improve patient outcomes in clinical trials. Antibiotic combination therapy is routinely used in clinical practice; however, the preferred combination has not been defined. This narrative review focuses on evidence-based solutions for the treatment of invasive CRAB infections. We dissect the promise and perils of traditional agents used in combination, such as colistin, sulbactam, and the tetracyclines, and offer clinical pearls based on our interpretation of the available data. Next, we investigate the merits of newly developed β-lactam agents like cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam, which have demonstrated contrasting results in recent randomized clinical trials. The review concludes with the authors' perspective on the evolving treatment landscape for CRAB infections, which is complicated by limited clinical data, imperfect treatment options, and a need for future clinical trials. We propose that effective treatment for CRAB infections requires a personalized approach that incorporates host factors, the site of infection, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic principles, local molecular epidemiology of CRAB isolates, and careful interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility testing results. In most clinical scenarios, a dose-optimized, sulbactam-based regimen is recommended with the addition of at least one other in vitro active agent. Should sulbactam-durlobactam receive regulatory approval, recommendations will need to be re-evaluated with the most recent evidence.

Infections in Burn Patients

Infections are the leading cause of mortality in burn patients who survive their initial resuscitation. Burn injury leads to immunosuppression and a dysregulated inflammatory response which can have a prolonged impact. Early surgical excision along with support of the multidisciplinary burn team has improved mortality in burn patients. The authors review diagnostic and therapeutic challenges as well as strategies for management of burn related infections.

Disc Diffusion and ComASP® Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine

Cefiderocol susceptibility testing represents a major challenge for clinical microbiology. Although disc diffusion showed robustness to test cefiderocol susceptibility, large areas of technical uncertainty (ATU) are reported by current EUCAST breakpoints. Herein, we evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol on a collection of 286 difficult-to-treat Gram-negative isolates using disc diffusion and ComASP^® cefiderocol microdilution panel. Broth microdilution (BMD) in iron-depleted Mueller-Hinton broth was used as reference method. Following the EUCAST guidelines, disc diffusion allowed to determine cefiderocol susceptibility (susceptible or resistant) in 78.6%, 88.1%, 85.4% and 100% of Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and S. maltophilia isolates tested, respectively. ComASP^® cefiderocol panel showed 94% and 84% of overall categorical agreement and essential agreement. Only one very major error and two major errors were observed, for MIC values nearly close to the resistance breakpoint (2 mg/L). Overall, 20.5% of the carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales that achieved ATU results by the disc diffusion method tested resistant by both ComASP^® panel and reference BMD. Conversely, all VIM-producing P. aeruginosa showed MIC values in the susceptible range (≤2 mg/L). Lastly, only six out of seven (85.7%) A. baumannii isolates showing inhibition zones <17 mm tested resistant by both ComASP^® panel and the reference BMD suggesting that inhibition zone <17 mm are not unequivocally suggestive of resistance. Our results, although obtained on a limited number of isolates, suggest that the combination of disc diffusion with a ComASP^® cefiderocol microdilution panel could be a viable solution to overcome the challenge of cefiderocol susceptibility testing in routine microbiology laboratories.

In Vitro Synergistic Activity of Antimicrobial Combinations against Carbapenem- and Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae

Polymyxins are commonly used as the last resort for the treatment of MDR Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae nosocomial infections; however, apart from the already known toxicity issues, resistance to these agents is emerging. In the present study, we assessed the in vitro synergistic activity of antimicrobial combinations against carbapenem-resistant and colistin-resistant A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae in an effort to provide more options for their treatment. Two hundred A. baumannii and one hundred and six K. pneumoniae single clinical isolates with resistance to carbapenems and colistin, recovered between 1 January 2021 and 31 July 2022,were included. A. baumannii were tested by the MIC test strip fixed-ratio method for combinations of colistin with either meropenem or rifampicin or daptomycin. K. pneumoniae were tested for the combinations of colistin with meropenem and ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam. Synergy was observed at: 98.99% for colistin and meropenem against A. baumannii; 91.52% for colistin and rifampicin; and 100% for colistin and daptomycin. Synergy was also observed at: 73.56% for colistin and meropenem against K. pneumoniae and; and 93% for ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam. The tested antimicrobial combinations presented high synergy rates, rendering them valuable options against A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae infections.

Assessment of the Susceptibility of Clinical Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacterial Strains to Fosfomycin and Significance of This Antibiotic in Infection Treatment

Multidrug resistance of bacteria has prompted intensive development work on new medicines, but also the search for effective options among the oldest antibiotics. Although intravenous fosfomycin (IVFOS) seems to be an interesting proposal, the recommended agar dilution method for susceptibility determination poses a major problem in routine diagnostic testing. As a consequence, there is a lack of comprehensive data on the frequency of isolation of susceptible or resistant strains. This fact triggered the disposition of EUCAST concerning the revision of IVFOS breakpoints (BPs), including withdrawal of BPs for Enterobacterales (excluding E. coli) and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the activity of fosfomycin against numerous clinical strains using recommended methods. Materials and methods: A total of 997 bacterial strains were tested from the following genera: Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas spp., Staphylococcus spp., Acinetobacter spp., and Enterococcus spp., for which there are currently no BPs. The strains were isolated from various clinical materials from patients hospitalized in five hospitals. During the investigation, the recommended agar dilution method was used. Susceptibility to other antibiotics and resistance mechanisms were determined using an automatic method (Phoenix) the disk diffusion method, and E-tests. MIC values of fosfomycin were estimated for all strains and for susceptible and multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains individually. Results: Except for Acinetobacter and Enterococcus, 83% of the strains were susceptible to IVFOS, including the largest percentage of S. aureus and E. coli. Klebsiella spp. turned out to be the least susceptible strains (66%). The highest proportion of susceptibility to fosfomycin was found among strains that were sensitive to other antibiotics (80.9%), and the lowest was found among Gram-negative carbapenemase-producing bacteria (55.6%) and ESBL+ bacteria (61.6%). The MIC evaluation revealed the lowest MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values for S. aureus (0.5 mg/L and 1 mg/L, respectively) and E. coli (4 mg/L and 32 mg/L, respectively). The highest values of MIC₅₀ were found for Acinetobacter spp. (256 mg/L), while the highest values of MIC₉₀ were found for Acinetobacter spp. and Klebsiella spp. (256 mg/L and 512 mg/L, respectively). Conclusions: IVFOS appears to be suitable for the treatment of many infections, including the empirical treatment of polymicrobial infections and those caused by MDR strains, since the sensitivity of the studied strains to this antibiotic in different groups ranged from 66% to as much as 99%. Sensitivity to fosfomycin was also demonstrated by 60% of carbapenem-resistant strains; therefore, IVFOS is one of the few therapeutic options that can be effective against the most resistant Gram-negative rods. In light of the general consultation posted by EUCAST, obtaining data such as IVFOS MIC value distributions may be vital for the decision of implementing fosfomycin into breakpoint tables.

Synergistic Effect of Clinically Available Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors Combined with Cefiderocol against Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Organisms

The role of β-lactamases in reduced susceptibility or resistance to cefiderocol has been supported by recent reports. The purpose of this study was to investigate the in vitro impact of clinically available β-lactamase inhibitors on cefiderocol activity against characterized carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative isolates. A collection of 39 well-characterized Gram-negative isolates obtained from various clinical sources and countries were included. Cefiderocol antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated via reference broth microdilution. The chequerboard microdilution method and time-kill assays were used to determine the synergy of tazobactam, avibactam, vaborbactam and relebactam in combination with cefiderocol. MICs of cefiderocol presented a 4- to 256-fold reduction against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Gram-negative isolates (predominantly K. pneumoniae) when avibactam, vaborbactam and relebactam were combined individually. Notably, the KPC-inhibitors led to a 4- to 32-fold reduction in cefiderocol MICs in the four cefiderocol-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates, showing restoration of cefiderocol susceptibility (MIC ≤ 2 mg/L) in ten out of twelve cases. Tazobactam led to a 4- to 64-fold decrease in cefiderocol MICs only in K. pneumoniae strains harbouring bla_KPC-41, bla_KPC-31, bla_KPC-53 and bla_KPC-66. The synergistic effect of all serine-β-lactamase inhibitors on cefiderocol activity was also shown in OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales strains. Conversely, a combination of β-lactamases inhibitors with cefiderocol was not synergistic with all OXA-23-like-producing strains and most metallo-β-lactamases producers. In conclusion, the addition of clinically available serine β-lactamase inhibitors to cefiderocol might represent an important development in the formulation to increase its spectrum and therapeutic efficacy, and to limit in vivo resistance emergence.