Short-course Antibiotic Therapy-Replacing Constantine Units With "Shorter Is Better"

Short-course treatment for community-acquired pneumonia in adults aged less than 65 years in Japan: A descriptive study using large healthcare claims database

INTRODUCTION

In community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), short-course treatment is not inferior in effectiveness compared to conventional treatment durations, and clinical guidelines recommend 5-7-day-long treatments. However, it remains unclear how widely this practice is adopted in Japan. This study aimed to clarify the treatment duration of CAP in Japan using a large healthcare claims database.

METHODS

We used health insurance claims data provided by JMDC Inc. (Tokyo, Japan) and included patients aged 18-64 years diagnosed with CAP who began antibiotic treatment between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022. Short-course treatment was defined as ≤ 7 d. Analyses were conducted separately for inpatient and outpatient cases, and the annual trends were also investigated.

RESULTS

Overall, 25,572 patients (3367 inpatients and 22,205 outpatients) were included in the analysis. Short-course treatment was administered to 1087 (32 %) inpatients and 15,614 (70 %) outpatients. The proportion of short-course treatments during the 10-year study period was 31-35 % for inpatient cases and 67-72 % for outpatient cases, with no marked changes over the years.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of inpatients receiving short-course treatments for CAP was low. In Japan, especially for inpatient cases, further efforts are required to optimize the duration of CAP treatment.

Implementing an antibiotic stewardship program to reduce the duration of antibiotics in community-acquired pneumonia: Experience in a French pediatric hospital

OBJECTIVE

This work used a before-after study to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted stewardship intervention on the recommended duration of antibiotic treatment (5 vs 10 days) for non-severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in pediatrics.

METHODS

Children under age 15 years and 3 months who consulted for CAP in the emergency care unit of Nantes University Hospital from November 2019 to January 2020 and from December 2020 to April 2021 were included. Before the second period, the updated protocol was presented at a local meeting, sent by e-mail, and added to the internal network; physicians' knowledge was tested through clinical situations and answers to the questionnaire as well as pocket cards were distributed. The main outcome was the absolute and relative difference in prescription adequacy according to the recommended duration of antibiotic therapy (5 days) before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

We included 134 children: 71 and 63 before and after the intervention respectively. The proportion of adequate duration of antibiotic therapy prescribed was increased: 27 (38.0 %) children in the "before" group versus 50 (79.4 %) in the "after" group (p < 0.0001). The prescription adequacy ratio (after/before) was 2.09 (95 %CI, 1.51-2.88). The mean treatment duration was significantly higher in the "before" than "after" group: 7.3 versus 5.7 days (p < 0.0001). A total of 155 days of treatment per 100 treated children was avoided. The proportion of correctly prescribed dosages was higher in the "after" than the "before" group: + 18 % (p = 0.03). The proportion of nasopharyngeal PCR tests performed was significantly higher after than before the intervention (p < 0.0001). Chest X-rays were performed in almost all children in both groups.

CONCLUSION

This multifaceted stewardship intervention demonstrated clinically and statistically significant results concerning the prescribed antibiotic therapy duration at individual and population levels and could be extended to other care centers and other situations.

Seven versus 14 days of antimicrobial therapy for severe multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections in intensive care unit patients (OPTIMISE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Shorter courses of antimicrobial therapy have been shown to be non-inferior to longer durations for the management of several infections. However, data on critically ill patients with severe infections by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) are scarce. In the duratiOn of theraPy in severe infecTIons by MultIdrug-reSistant gram-nEgative bacteria (OPTIMISE) trial, we assessed the non-inferiority of 7-day versus 14-day antimicrobial therapy for patients with intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired severe infections by MDR-GNB.

METHODS

This was a randomised multicenter, open-label, parallel controlled, non-inferiority trial. Adult patients with severe infections by MDR-GNB initiated ≥ 48 h of ICU admission were eligible if they were hemodynamically stable and without fever > 48 h on the 7th day of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Patients were 1:1 randomised to discontinue antimicrobial therapy on the 7th (± 1) day or to continue for a total of 14 (± 1) days. The primary outcome was clinical failure, defined as death or relapse of infection within 28 days of randomisation. An upper edge of the two-tailed 95% confidence interval (CI) of the delta between the clinical failure rate in the 7- and the 14-day lower than 10% in both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses was set as the non-inferiority criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients composed the ITT population: 59 and 47 allocated to 7- and 14-day groups, respectively. The PP population included 75 patients: 47 and 28 in the 7- and 14-day groups, respectively. Clinical failure occurred in 42.4% and 44.7% of the ITT population in 7- and 14-day groups, respectively, (risk difference (RD) - 2.3, 95%CI - 21.3 to 16.7), and in 46.8% and 50.0% of the PP population in 7- and 14-day groups, respectively (RD - 3.2, 95%CI - 26.6 to 20.2).  Most infections were of the respiratory tract (73/68.9%) and caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (42/39.6%). The study was interrupted before reaching planned sample size due to low recruitment rate.

CONCLUSION

The OPTIMISE trial could not determine the non-inferiority of 7-day compared to 14-day therapy for severe infections caused by MDR-GNB due to early termination related to the low recruitment rate.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05210387 on January 13, 2022.

A step further: Antibiotic stewardship programme in home hospital

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the adequacy of empirical antibiotic prescription and the duration of antibiotic therapy for infected patients admitted for conventional hospitalization (CH) and Hospitalization at Home (HaH) after implementation of an antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) in HaH.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

Patients admitted for infection to Emergency Department between October and December 2023. "CH-ASP cohort" was admitted to CH with ASP intervention, "CH cohort" was admitted to CH without ASP intervention, "HaH cohort" was admitted to HaH (integrated daily ASP intervention).

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were analyzed in CH-ASP, 60 in CH, and 101 in HaH. The ASP made recommendations on empirical antibiotic therapy for 175 patients (92 %) with a 98 % acceptance rate. For 111 patients (44 %) the ASP made recommendations on antibiotic duration (24 % CH-ASP vs 89 % HaH, p < 0.001), with a 73 % acceptance rate (41 % CH-ASP vs 81 % HaH, p < 0.001). Empirical antibiotic adequacy was 94 % (93 % CH-ASP vs 87 % CH vs 100 % HaH, p = 0.006). Median duration of antibiotic therapy was nine days in CH-ASP and CH vs seven in HaH (p < 0.001). There were no differences in mortality and readmissions. In the multivariate analysis, patients in CH-ASP and CH had total duration of antibiotic therapy of 2.2 (95 % CI: 0.2-4.2) and 3 days more (95 % CI: 0.8-5.3) respectively as compared to HaH.

CONCLUSIONS

ASP improves empirical antibiotic adequacy in patients admitted for infection. ASP in HaH, because of high acceptance of intervention regarding antibiotic duration, achieves shorter treatment durations without increased mortality or readmission.

Shorter vs. standard-duration antibiotic therapy for nocardiosis: a multi-center retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The prolonged treatment recommended for nocardiosis does not rely on strong evidence. Consequently, some clinicians opt shorter therapy in certain circumstances. We assessed the effectiveness of shorter therapy.

METHODS

A multi-center retrospective cohort study comprising individuals diagnosed with nocardiosis between 2007 and 2022. We classified all patients who survived 90 days into three groups according to treatment duration: short (≤ 90 days), intermediate (91-180 days), and prolonged (> 180 days). We compared baseline characteristics (comorbidities, immune status) and nocardiosis manifestations across the unadjusted treatment groups, one-year all-cause mortality, disease relapse, and antibiotic-related adverse events to identify patients who may safely receive the short course.

RESULTS

We detected 176 patients with nocardiosis, their median age was 65 years; 74 (42%) were women. Forty-three (24%) patients died within 90 days. Of the remaining 133, 37 (28%) patients received short therapy, 40 (30%) intermediate, and 56 (42%) prolonged treatment duration. Longer courses were more likely to be administered to patients with immunosuppression, disseminated nocardiosis, and N. farcinica infection. Within a year, 20 (15%) individuals died and 2 (2%) relapsed. Treatment duration was not associated with either mortality (p = 0.945) or relapse (p = 0.509). Nocardiosis was the cause of death in only one patient, receiving a prolonged course. Of 73 patients with solitary pulmonary nocardiosis, 20 (27%) received short duration. None relapsed and 2 (10%) died, both immunocompromised. The rate of AE was similar across the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

With clinically guided case-by-case patient selection nocardiosis can be safely treated for durations significantly shorter than traditionally recommended.

Environmental Antimicrobial Resistance: Implications for Food Safety and Public Health

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious global health issue, aggravated by antibiotic overuse and misuse in human medicine, animal care, and agriculture. This study looks at the different mechanisms that drive AMR, such as environmental contamination, horizontal gene transfer, and selective pressure, as well as the severe implications of AMR for human and animal health. This study demonstrates the need for concerted efforts across the scientific, healthcare, agricultural, and policy sectors to control the emergence of AMR. Some crucial strategies discussed include developing antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs, encouraging targeted narrow-spectrum antibiotic use, and emphasizing the significance of strict regulatory frameworks and surveillance systems, like the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) and the Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) classification. This study also emphasizes the need for national and international action plans in combating AMR and promotes the One Health strategy, which unifies environmental, animal, and human health. This study concludes that preventing the spread of AMR and maintaining the effectiveness of antibiotics for future generations requires a comprehensive, multidisciplinary, and internationally coordinated strategy.

Duration of Antimicrobial Treatment in Adult Patients with Pneumonia: A Narrative Review

Pneumonia remains a major global health concern, causing significant morbidity and mortality among adults. This narrative review assesses the optimal duration of antimicrobial treatment in adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Current evidence about the impact of treatment duration on clinical outcomes demonstrates that shorter antibiotic courses are non-inferior, regarding safety and efficacy, compared to longer courses, particularly in patients with mild to moderate CAP, which is in line with the recommendations of international guidelines. Data are limited regarding the optimal antimicrobial duration in HAP patients, and it should be individually tailored to each patient, taking into account the causative pathogen and the clinical response. Shorter courses are found to be as effective as longer courses in the management of VAP, except for pneumonia caused by non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria; however, duration should be balanced between the possibility of higher recurrence rates and the documented benefits with shorter courses. Additionally, the validation of reliable biomarkers or clinical predictors that identify patients who would benefit from shorter therapy is crucial. Insights from this review may lead to future research on personalized antimicrobial therapies in pneumonia, in order to improve patient outcomes.

Evaluating the duration of antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of orthopedic hardware infections

The optimal duration of antimicrobial therapy for orthopedic hardware infections is unclear. We identified 216 patients with orthopedic hardware infections, of whom 42 (19%) later had relapsed infection. Chronic suppressive antimicrobial therapy beyond 12 weeks was not significantly associated with lower odds of relapse.IMPORTANCEThere is debate about how long to continue antibiotics after initial treatment of bone and joint infections when hardware remains in place. This study found no benefit from continuing antibiotics longer than 12 weeks when trying to prevent recurrent infection.

The private market for antimicrobials: an exploration of two selected mining and frontier areas of Guyana

Objective

To identify challenges that may raise pathogens' resistance to antimicrobial drugs by exploring the private market for antimicrobials in two selected mining and frontier areas of Guyana.

Methods

The private sector supply was mapped by approaching all authorized pharmacies and informal outlets, e.g., street vendors and grocery stores, around the two selected towns. Interviews were conducted with a) sellers on the availability of drugs, expiration dates, prices, and main producers; and b) customers on purchased drugs, diagnoses, and prescriptions received before purchasing drugs, and intention to complete the treatment. The information collected was described, and the determinants of the self-reported intention of customers to complete the whole treatment were identified.

Results

From the perspective of the supply of antimicrobials, essential medicines faced low and insecure availability, and prescriptions frequently deviated from diagnoses. From the perspective of the demand for antimicrobials, one-third of purchased antibiotics had a high potential for antimicrobial resistance as per the World Health Organization AWaRe classification. A high price reduced the self-reported intention to complete the treatment among those who had a prescription, while buying the medication in a licensed pharmacy increased such intention.

Conclusions

In Guyana, there persists a need to establish and revise policies addressing both supply and demand, such as restricting the sale of antimicrobials to licensed pharmacies and upon prescription, improving prescription practices while reducing the financial burden to patients, guaranteeing access to first-line treatment drugs, and instructing patients on appropriate use of antimicrobials. Revising such policies is an essential step to contain antimicrobial resistance in the analyzed areas and across Guyana.

Improved Clinical Outcomes with Appropriate Meropenem De-escalation in Patients with Febrile Neutropenia

Introduction

Antibiotic stewardship is a critical aspect of managing cancer patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) to limit the development of drug-resistant organisms and minimize adverse drug effects. Thus, it has been recommended that patients with FN receiving empiric antibiotics should be re-evaluated for safe antibiotic de-escalation.

Methods

Subjects treated with meropenem for febrile neutropenia who met Loyola University Medical Center's (LUMC) criteria for de-escalation were stratified based on whether meropenem was de-escalated, and 30-day all-cause mortality for both groups was assessed.

Results

181 patients met criteria for meropenem de-escalation. Sixty patients (31.3%) were ade-escalated (MDE), and 121 subjects were not (NDE). The 30-day all-cause mortality was 8.3% (n = 5/60 subjects) in the MDE group and 2.4% (n = 3/121) in the NDE group but was not statistically significant (P=0.1). Median hospital length of stay was 13 days in the MDE group versus 20 days in the NDE group (P = 0.049). CDI rate was also lower in the de-escalated group. In addition, consultations by infectious diseases physicians were more common in the de-escalation group. Logistic regression model demonstrated positive culture (OR 4.78, P = 0.03), including positive blood culture (OR 8.05, P = 0.003), and GVHD (OR 19.44, P = 0.029), and were associated with high rates of appropriate de-escalation. Immunosuppression (OR 0.22, P = 0.004) was associated with lower rates of appropriate de-escalation.

Conclusion

Appropriate meropenem de-escalation in FN patients is safe and can result in improved clinical outcomes.

Short Versus Long Antibiotic Duration in Streptococcus pneumoniae Bacteremia

Background

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a common pathogen associated with bloodstream infections, respiratory infections, peritonitis, infective endocarditis, and meningitis. Literature assessing duration of antibiotic therapy for a S pneumoniae bacteremia secondary to common infection is scarce, leading to variability in practice. Therefore, this study evaluated the effectiveness of short (5-10 days) versus long (11-16 days) antibiotic durations for S pneumoniae bacteremia.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center cohort study assessed hospitalized patients with S pneumoniae-positive blood cultures, who received active antibiotics within 48 hours of first positive blood culture collection and achieved clinical stability by day 10 of the first positive blood culture collection. Exclusion criteria included treatment duration <5 or >16 days, death before completion of 10 days of therapy, polymicrobial bloodstream infection, and invasive infection. Rates of clinical failure (composite of 30-day hospital readmission, bacteremia recurrence, and mortality) were compared between the groups.

Results

A total of 162 patients were included, with 51 patients in the short- and 111 patients in the long-duration group. Pneumonia was the suspected source of bacteremia in 90.1% of patients. Rates of clinical failure were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Patients received a median antibiotic course of 7 days in the short group compared to 14 days in the long group; however, there was no significant difference observed in the median hospital length of stay, median intensive care unit length of stay, or rate of Clostridioides difficile infection.

Conclusions

Shorter antibiotic courses may be appropriate in patients with S pneumoniae bacteremia secondary to community-acquired pneumonia.

''Myth Busting in Infectious Diseases'': A Comprehensive Review

Antibiotics have played a pivotal role in modern medicine, drastically reducing mortality rates associated with bacterial infections. Despite their significant contributions, the emergence of antibiotic resistance has become a formidable challenge, necessitating a re-evaluation of antibiotic use practices. The widespread belief in clinical practice that bactericidal antibiotics are inherently superior to bacteriostatic ones lacks consistent support from evidence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). With the latest evidence, certain infections have demonstrated equal or even superior efficacy with bacteriostatic agents. Furthermore, within clinical practice, there is a tendency to indiscriminately order urine cultures for febrile patients, even in cases where alternative etiologies might be present. Consequently, upon obtaining a positive urine culture result, patients often receive antimicrobial prescriptions despite the absence of clinical indications warranting such treatment. Furthermore, it is a prevailing notion among physicians that extended durations of antibiotic therapy confer potential benefits and mitigate the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Contrary to this belief, empirical evidence refutes such assertions. This article aims to address common myths and misconceptions within the field of infectious diseases.

A multinational survey of companion animal veterinary clinicians: How can antimicrobial stewardship guidelines be optimised for the target stakeholder?

Antimicrobial stewardship initiatives are widely regarded as a cornerstone for ameliorating the global health impact of antimicrobial resistance. Within companion animal health, such efforts have largely focused on development and dissemination of antimicrobial stewardship guidelines (ASGs). However, there have been few attempts to understand veterinarian attitudes towards and knowledge of ASGs or to determine how awareness regarding ASGs might best be increased. An online survey regarding ASGs was formulated for veterinarians who treat companion animals. The survey was distributed across 46 European and associated countries between 12 January and 30 June, 2022. In total, 2271 surveys were completed, with 64.9% of respondents (n = 1474) reporting awareness and usage of at least one ASG. Respondents from countries with greater awareness of ASGs tended to report more appropriate use of antimicrobials (Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.6084, P ≤ 0.001), with respondents from countries with country-specific ASGs tending to score highest across both awareness and appropriate use domains. Respondents prioritised guidance around antimicrobial choice (82.0%, n = 1863), duration of treatment (66.0%, n = 1499), and dosage (51.9%, n = 1179) for inclusion in future ASGs, with 78.0% (n = 1776) of respondents preferring ASGs to be integrated into their patient management system. Awareness of ASGs and their use in companion animal veterinary practice appears to be greater than previously reported, with respondents tending to report antimicrobial prescription decision making broadly in line with current clinical recommendations. However, further initiatives aimed at maximising accessibility to ASGs both within countries and individual veterinary practices are recommended.

A Randomized, Open-Label, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial Assessing 7 Versus 14 Days of Antimicrobial Therapy for Severe Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: The OPTIMISE Trial Protocol

INTRODUCTION

Shorter courses of antimicrobials have been shown to be non-inferior to longer, "traditional" duration of therapies, including for some severe healthcare-associated infections, with a few exceptions. However, evidence is lacking regarding shorter regimes against severe infections by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB), which are often caused by distinct strains and commonly treated with second-line antimicrobials. In the duratiOn of theraPy in severe infecTIons by MultIdrug-reSistant gram-nEgative bacteria (OPTIMISE) trial, we aim to assess the non-inferiority of 7-day versus 14-day antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients with severe infections caused by MDR-GNB.

METHODS

This is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel controlled trial to assess the non-inferiority of 7-day versus 14-day of adequate antimicrobial therapy for intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired severe infections by MDR-GNB. Adult patients with severe infections by MDR-GNB initiated after 48 h of ICU admission are screened for eligibility. Patients are eligible if they proved to be hemodynamically stable and without fever for at least 48 h on the 7th day of adequate antimicrobial therapy. After consenting, patients are 1:1 randomized to discontinue antimicrobial therapy on the 7th (± 1) day or to continue for a total of 14th (± 1) days.

PLANNED OUTCOMES

The primary outcome is treatment failure, defined as death or relapse of infection within 28 days after randomization. Non-inferiority will be achieved if the upper edge of the two-tailed 95% confidence interval of the difference between the clinical failure rate in the 7-day and the 14-day group is not higher than 10%.

CONCLUSION

The OPTIMISE trial is the first randomized controlled trial specifically designed to assess the duration of antimicrobial therapy in patients with severe infections by MDR-GNB.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05210387. Registered on 27 January 2022. Seven Versus 14 Days of Antibiotic Therapy for Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Bacilli Infections (OPTIMISE).

Impact of a sustained, collaborative antimicrobial stewardship programme in spinal cord injury patients

Background

In patients with spinal cord injuries (SCIs), infections continue to be a leading cause of morbidity, mortality and hospital admission.

Objectives

This study evaluated the long-term impact of a weekly, multidisciplinary Spinal/Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) meeting for acute-care SCI inpatients, on antimicrobial prescribing over 3 years.

Methods

A retrospective, longitudinal, pre-post comparison of antimicrobial prescribing was conducted at our tertiary hospital in Melbourne. Antimicrobial prescribing was audited in 6 month blocks pre- (25 April 2017 to 24 October 2017), immediately post- (27 March 2018 to 25 September 2018) and 3 years post-implementation (2 March 2021 to 31 August 2021). Antimicrobial orders for patients admitted under the spinal unit at the meeting time were included.

Results

The number of SCI patients prescribed an antimicrobial at the time of the weekly meeting decreased by 40% at 3 years post-implementation [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.63; 95% CI 0.51-0.79; P ≤ 0.001]. The overall number of antimicrobial orders decreased by over 22% at 3 years post-implementation (IRR 0.78; 95% CI 0.61-1.00; P = 0.052). A shorter antimicrobial order duration in the 3 year post-implementation period was observed (-28%; 95% CI -39% to -15%; P ≤ 0.001). This was most noticeable in IV orders at 3 years (-36%; 95% CI -51% to -16%; P = 0.001), and was also observed for oral orders at 3 years (-25%; 95% CI -38% to -10%; P = 0.003). Antimicrobial course duration (days) decreased for multiple indications: skin and soft tissue infections (-43%; 95% CI -67% to -1%; P = 0.045), pulmonary infections (-45%; 95% CI -67% to -9%; P = 0.022) and urinary infections (-31%; 95% CI -47% to -9%; P = 0.009). Ninety-day mortality rates were not impacted.

Conclusions

This study showed that consistent, collaborative meetings between the Spinal and AMS teams can reduce antimicrobial exposure for acute-care SCI patients without adversely impacting 90 day mortality.

Decision-making regarding antibiotic therapy duration: An observational study of multidisciplinary meetings in the intensive care unit

PURPOSE

Antibiotic therapy is commonly prescribed longer than recommended in intensive care patients (ICU). We aimed to provide insight into the decision-making process on antibiotic therapy duration in the ICU.

METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted, involving direct observations of antibiotic decision-making during multidisciplinary meetings in four Dutch ICUs. The study used an observation guide, audio recordings, and detailed field notes to gather information about the discussions on antibiotic therapy duration. We described the participants' roles in the decision-making process and focused on arguments contributing to decision-making.

RESULTS

We observed 121 discussions on antibiotic therapy duration in sixty multidisciplinary meetings. 24.8% of discussions led to a decision to stop antibiotics immediately. In 37.2%, a prospective stop date was determined. Arguments for decisions were most often brought forward by intensivists (35.5%) and clinical microbiologists (22.3%). In 28.9% of discussions, multiple healthcare professionals participated equally in the decision. We identified 13 main argument categories. While intensivists mostly used arguments based on clinical status, clinical microbiologists used diagnostic results in the discussion.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary decision-making regarding the duration of antibiotic therapy is a complex but valuable process, involving different healthcare professionals, using a variety of argument-types to determine the duration of antibiotic therapy. To optimize the decision-making process, structured discussions, involvement of relevant specialties, and clear communication and documentation of the antibiotic plan are recommended.

Determining the Appropriateness of Initiating Antibiotic Therapy in Nursing Home Residents

One approach for improving antibiotic prescribing in nursing homes is evaluating appropriateness of initiating antibiotic therapy. However, determining appropriateness has been a challenge. To investigate this problem literature review identified studies evaluating appropriateness of initiating antibiotic therapy in nursing homes. Two criteria were used most often to assess appropriateness: infection surveillance criterion or criteria specifically designed to assist clinicians for prescribing antibiotics. Development of these criteria and results of studies using these criteria were reviewed. There was considerable variability in percentage appropriateness of initiating therapy for these criteria, variation in the methodology for conducting these studies, and limitations of the criteria. The main limitation of infection surveillance criteria is that they are specifically designed to be highly specific but this results in low sensitivity. Thus, surveillance criteria should not be used for assessing appropriateness of antibiotic therapy. The other criterion is limited because it uses only localizing signs and symptoms of infection and these findings may not be documented in the medical record when evaluating appropriateness retrospectively. Several alternative methods to assess appropriateness were identified but evaluation of these methods have not been published. Several changes are suggested to improve the evaluation of the appropriateness of initiating antibiotic therapy in nursing home residents: confirmation by the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services that surveillance definitions should not be used to evaluate appropriateness; develop and validate definitions of clinical infections in residents; standardize methods to evaluate appropriateness prospectively by the facility antimicrobial stewardship program; educate clinicians and nursing staff regarding the criteria for assessing appropriateness; and investigate the influence of provider-, resident-, family-, and facility-level factors on antibiotic use in nursing home residents.

How to change the course: practical aspects of implementing shorter is better

BACKGROUND

Based on multiple randomized-controlled clinical trials, shorter antibiotic courses are equally effective as traditional longer courses for many types of infections. However, longer courses are still being used widely in the clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To describe four components involved in the successful implementation of shorter antibiotic courses in our health care institutions, including an academic, public hospital and a community hospital staffed primarily by private practitioners.

SOURCES

Clinical trials and peer-reviewed publications.

CONTENT

We provide practical advice on how to support the change in clinical practice to shorten antibiotic duration. Specifically, we list the steps that we have successfully used to develop and implement an institutional practice change regarding the duration of antibiotic therapy: (a) establishing consensus documents outlining a data-driven expected practice for using antibiotics, (b) antibiotic stewardship programme support, (c) provider education, and (d) reinforcing behaviour through psychological and other tools. The implementation of these processes has successfully led to shorter antibiotic courses and decreased antibiotic use in our diverse practice settings.

IMPLICATIONS

Intentional improvement in decreasing the duration of antibiotic therapy can be achieved by a specific antibiotic stewardship programme strategy and tactics. The implementation of shorter antibiotic courses has effects at individual and societal levels in an era of increasing antibacterial resistance and health care costs.

Criteria to achieve safe antimicrobial intravenous-to-oral switch in hospitalised adult populations: a systematic rapid review

OBJECTIVES

This rapid review aimed to assess and collate intravenous-to-oral switch (IVOS) criteria from the literature to achieve safe and effective antimicrobial IVOS in the hospital inpatient adult population.

DESIGN

The rapid review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.

DATA SOURCES

OVID Embase and Medline databases.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Articles of adult populations published globally between 2017 and 2021 were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

An Excel spreadsheet was designed with specific column headings. IVOS criteria from UK hospital IVOS policies informed the framework synthesis.

RESULTS

IVOS criteria from 45/164 (27%) local IVOS policies were categorised into a five-section framework: (1) timing of IV antimicrobial review, (2) clinical signs and symptoms, (3) infection markers, (4) enteral route and (5) infection exclusions. The literature search identified 477 papers, of which 16 were included. The most common timing for review was 48-72 hours from initiation of intravenous antimicrobial (n=5, 30%). Nine studies (56%) stated clinical signs and symptoms must be improving. Temperature was the most frequently mentioned infection marker (n=14, 88%). Endocarditis had the highest mention as an infection exclusion (n=12, 75%). Overall, 33 IVOS criteria were identified to go forward into the Delphi process.

CONCLUSION

Through the rapid review, 33 IVOS criteria were collated and presented within five distinct and comprehensive sections. The literature highlighted the possibility of reviewing IVOS before 48-72 hours and of presenting heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate as a combination early warning score criterion. The criteria identified can serve as a starting point of IVOS criteria review for any institution globally, as no country or region limits were applied. Further research is required to achieve consensus on IVOS criteria from healthcare professionals that manage patients with infections.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022320343.

Utility of Procalcitonin in Clinical Practice

The rise of multi-resistant infections and complications associated with the overuse of antibiotics has led to the implementation of antibiotic stewardship strategies as a marker of patient safety and quality. Using biomarkers that can accurately predict the presence or absence of bacterial infection, thus signaling the need for antibiotic use, or supporting appropriate and safe discontinuation, has become an increasingly relevant strategy for antibiotic stewardship. Evidence supporting procalcitonin for antimicrobial stewardship has focused mostly on lower respiratory tract infections and sepsis. This review discusses the most relevant evidence to support the use of procalcitonin in clinical practice.

Duration of antibiotic therapy among paediatricians: A national survey of current clinical practice in Spain

OBJECTIVES

Appropriate duration of antibiotic treatment is a key principle to reduce the emergence of bacterial resistance and antibiotic harm. The aim of this study was to document current clinical practice among Spanish paediatricians in terms of the duration of antibiotic therapy in both inpatient and outpatient settings, mapping the difference between practice and guidelines, and thus identifying opportunities to improve practice.

METHODS

A national exploratory work survey was distributed in 2020 as a questionnaire about seven main infectious syndromes in children: genitourinary; skin and soft tissue; osteoarticular; ear, nose and throat; pneumonia; central nervous system; and bacteraemia. The answers were contrasted with current recommendations regarding the duration of antibiotic therapy. Demographic analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 992 paediatricians in Spain, representing 9.5% of paediatricians working in the Spanish national health system. Hospital care clinicians accounted for 42.7% (6662/15590) of responses. The antibiotic duration used in practice was longer than recommended in 40.8% (6359/15590) of responses, and shorter than recommended in 16% (1705/10654) of responses. Only 25% (249/992) and 23% (229/992) of respondents indicated that they would prescribe antibiotics for the recommended treatment duration for lower urinary tract infection and community-acquired pneumonia (AI evidence). Among severe hospital-managed infections, a tendency towards longer courses of antibiotics was found for non-complicated meningococcal infections and non-complicated pneumococcal, Gram-negative and S. aureus bacteraemia.

CONCLUSIONS

A noteworthy tendency towards prescribing antibiotics for longer than recommended among paediatricians was evidenced in this nationwide study, highlighting a wide range of opportunities for potential improvement.

Safe shortening of antibiotic treatment duration for complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAFE trial): protocol for a randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial comparing 4 and 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment

INTRODUCTION

A major knowledge gap in the treatment of complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy. Safe shortening of antibiotic therapy has the potential to reduce adverse drug events, length of hospital stay and costs. The objective of the SAFE trial is to evaluate whether 4 weeks of antibiotic therapy is non-inferior to 6 weeks in patients with complicated SAB.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The SAFE-trial is a multicentre, non-inferiority, open-label, parallel group, randomised controlled trial evaluating 4 versus 6 weeks of antibiotic therapy for complicated SAB. The study is performed in 15 university hospitals and general hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible patients are adults with methicillin-susceptible SAB with evidence of deep-seated or metastatic infection and/or predictors of complicated SAB. Only patients with a satisfactory clinical response to initial antibiotic treatment are included. Patients with infected prosthetic material or an undrained abscess of 5 cm or more at day 14 of adequate antibiotic treatment are excluded. Primary outcome is success of therapy after 180 days, a combined endpoint of survival without evidence of microbiologically confirmed disease relapse. Assuming a primary endpoint occurrence of 90% in the 6 weeks group, a non-inferiority margin of 7.5% is used. Enrolment of 396 patients in total is required to demonstrate non-inferiority of shorter antibiotic therapy with a power of 80%. Currently, 152 patients are enrolled in the study.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This is the first randomised controlled trial evaluating duration of antibiotic therapy for complicated SAB. Non-inferiority of 4 weeks of treatment would allow shortening of treatment duration in selected patients with complicated SAB. This study is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee VUmc (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and registered under NL8347 (the Netherlands Trial Register). Results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NL8347 (the Netherlands Trial Register).

Can the Future of ID Escape the Inertial Dogma of Its Past? The Exemplars of Shorter Is Better and Oral Is the New IV

Like all fields of medicine, Infectious Diseases is rife with dogma that underpins much clinical practice. In this study, we discuss 2 specific examples of historical practice that have been overturned recently by numerous prospective studies: traditional durations of antimicrobial therapy and the necessity of intravenous (IV)-only therapy for specific infectious syndromes. These dogmas are based on uncontrolled case series from >50 years ago, amplified by the opinions of eminent experts. In contrast, more than 120 modern, randomized controlled trials have established that shorter durations of therapy are equally effective for many infections. Furthermore, 21 concordant randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that oral antibiotic therapy is at least as effective as IV-only therapy for osteomyelitis, bacteremia, and endocarditis. Nevertheless, practitioners in many clinical settings remain refractory to adopting these changes. It is time for Infectious Diseases to move beyond its history of eminent opinion-based medicine and truly into the era of evidenced-based medicine.

Study of the Drivers of Inappropriate Use of Antibiotics in Community Pharmacy: Request for Antibiotics Without a Prescription, Degree of Adherence to Treatment and Correct Recycling of Leftover Treatment

INTRODUCTION

The WHO considered antibiotic resistance as 1 of the 10 greatest threats to global health in 2019. The inappropriate and indiscriminate use of antibiotics, together with the lack of new therapeutic alternatives, may eradicate their effectiveness in the closest future.

OBJECTIVE

The general objective is to analyze the different causes attributable to patients, providers and pharmacists that could be drivers of irrational use of antibiotics, and responsible for the appearance of bacterial resistance, in community pharmacies. To this end, the different processes or indicators were studied: patients' requests of antibiotics at the pharmacy, their degree of adherence, satisfaction with the prescribed treatment and antibiotics' surplus recycling.

METHODS

This study was observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional, carried out in 2 pharmacy offices, including 333 participants. At the time of dispensing, first phase, surveys to collect patients', providers' and pharmacists' data were carried out over the counter. The second phase, with the aim of checking adherence, degree of satisfaction and recycling.

RESULTS

There were 333 requests for antibiotic regardless prescription availability, 17% of the patients requested an antibiotic without having one. 38% of patients did not have full adherence to antibiotics. Exploring non-adherence reasons, 24% forgot to take the treatment, 2% experienced adverse effects; 8% improved infection symptoms and 21% had problems to follow schedule. Regarding the recycling habits, 57% of patients had leftover treatments at home, but only 11% recycled it. 10% of medical prescriptions were forced by the patient, and significant gender differences were observed in adherence and knowledge of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggested that there may be a significant level of antibiotic inappropriate use locally, potentially related to patients' sex, finding significant deficiencies in prescription by doctors, in the dispensing act carried out in community pharmacies, and finally in patient compliance with treatment.

Machine learning and synthetic outcome estimation for individualised antimicrobial cessation

The decision on when it is appropriate to stop antimicrobial treatment in an individual patient is complex and under-researched. Ceasing too early can drive treatment failure, while excessive treatment risks adverse events. Under- and over-treatment can promote the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). We extracted routinely collected electronic health record data from the MIMIC-IV database for 18,988 patients (22,845 unique stays) who received intravenous antibiotic treatment during an intensive care unit (ICU) admission. A model was developed that utilises a recurrent neural network autoencoder and a synthetic control-based approach to estimate patients' ICU length of stay (LOS) and mortality outcomes for any given day, under the alternative scenarios of if they were to stop vs. continue antibiotic treatment. Control days where our model should reproduce labels demonstrated minimal difference for both stopping and continuing scenarios indicating estimations are reliable (LOS results of 0.24 and 0.42 days mean delta, 1.93 and 3.76 root mean squared error, respectively). Meanwhile, impact days where we assess the potential effect of the unobserved scenario showed that stopping antibiotic therapy earlier had a statistically significant shorter LOS (mean reduction 2.71 days, p -value <0.01). No impact on mortality was observed. In summary, we have developed a model to reliably estimate patient outcomes under the contrasting scenarios of stopping or continuing antibiotic treatment. Retrospective results are in line with previous clinical studies that demonstrate shorter antibiotic treatment durations are often non-inferior. With additional development into a clinical decision support system, this could be used to support individualised antimicrobial cessation decision-making, reduce the excessive use of antibiotics, and address the problem of AMR.

Short-course antibiotic therapy: The next frontier in antimicrobial stewardship

Ensuring appropriate use of antibiotics is critical to preserving their effectiveness through limiting the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance. Evidence is accumulating that shorter courses of antibiotics are as effective as traditional longer regimens for many common infections and can reduce the risk of adverse events. Despite the availability of evidence and guidelines supporting short-course antibiotic therapy for these conditions, prolonged use of antibiotics remains common. This article will review the origins and evolution of our approach regarding antimicrobial prescription duration, the evidence for the use of short-course therapy for selected infections, barriers to the uptake of this practice and potential approaches that can be taken to reduce inappropriately long antibiotic use.

Adherence of Spanish pediatricians to "do not do" guidelines to avoid low-value care in pediatrics

The main objective of this study was to analyze the degree of knowledge and compliance of Spanish pediatricians with the "do not do" recommendations of the Spanish Association of Pediatrics. A nationwide cross-sectional, descriptive study was carried out using a 25-item questionnaire among Spanish pediatricians. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were performed. A total of 1137 pediatricians participated in the study. Most of them were women (75.1%), older than 55 (28.3%), worked in specialized care (56.9%), with public financing (91.2%), and had been working for more than 20 years (44.9%). The median of inappropriate answers per question was 9.1%. The bivariate and multivariate analyses showed that the factors that influenced higher adequacy to the "do not do" recommendations were younger than 45 years, working in specialized care, and working in the public health system.

CONCLUSION

This research is the first nationwide study in Spain to analyze the adequacy of "do not do" pediatric clinical recommendations. The study showed a high level of compliance by Spanish pediatricians with these recommendations. However, there is a lack of knowledge in less frequent infectious pathologies such as HIV or fungal infections, in not prolonging antibiotic treatment unnecessarily and directing it appropriately according to the antibiogram results. These aspects may be improved by designing measures to enhance pediatricians' knowledge in these specific aspects. Some demographical factors are related to higher adequacy. Performing this research in other countries may allow assessing the current clinical practice of pediatricians.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Low-value care is defined as care that delivers little or no benefit, may cause patients harm, or outcomes marginal benefits at a disproportionately increased cost. • Few nationwide studies have assessed adherence to "do not do" guidelines, especially in pediatric settings.

WHAT IS NEW

• Albeit there is a high level of compliance by Spanish pediatricians with the «do not do» recommendations, there is a lack of knowledge in different aspects that may be improved. • Some demographical factors are related to higher adequacy. Performing this research in other countries may allow assessing the current clinical practice of pediatricians.

Multidisciplinary Collaboration for the Optimization of Antibiotic Prescription: Analysis of Clinical Cases of Pneumonia between Emergency, Internal Medicine, and Pharmacy Services

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia is a lung parenchyma acute infection usually treated with antibiotics. Increasing bacterial resistances force the review and control of antibiotic use criteria in different health departments.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the adequacy of antibiotic treatment in community-acquired pneumonia in patients initially attended at the emergency department and then admitted to the internal medicine service of the Alto Deba Hospital-Osakidetza Basque Country Health Service (Spain).

METHODS

Observational, retrospective study, based on the review of medical records of patients with community-acquired pneumonia attended at the hospital between January and May 2021. The review was made considering the following items: antimicrobial treatment indication, choice of antibiotic, time of administration of the first dose, adequacy of the de-escalation-sequential therapy, duration of treatment, monitoring of efficacy and adverse effects, and registry in the medical records. The review was made by the research team (professionals from the emergency department, internal medicine, and pharmacy services).

RESULTS

Fifty-five medical records were reviewed. The adequacy of the treatments showed that antibiotic indication, time of administration of the first dose, and monitoring of efficacy and adverse effects were the items with the greatest agreement between the three departments. This was not the case with the choice of antibiotic, de-escalation/sequential therapy, duration of treatment, and registration in the medical record, which have been widely discussed. The choice of antibiotic was optimal in 63.64% and might have been better in 25.45%. De-escalation/oral sequencing might have been better in 50.91%. The treatment duration was optimal in 45.45% of the patients and excessive in 45.45%.

DISCUSSION

The team agreed to disseminate these data among the hospital professionals and to propose audits and feedback through an antibiotic stewardship program. Besides this, implementing the local guideline and defining stability criteria to apply sequential therapy/de-escalation was considered essential.

Factors Associated with Acceptance of Telehealth-based Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Recommendations in a Community Hospital Health System

Background

Telehealth-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (TeleASPs) have led to reduced broad-spectrum antimicrobial utilization. Data on factors associated with acceptance of stewardship recommendations are limited.

Methods

A TeleASP, facilitated by remote infectious disease physicians and local pharmacists, was implemented in 2 community hospitals from February 2018 through July 2020. Variables potentially affecting acceptance of TeleASP recommendations were tracked. Odds ratios of acceptance were determined utilizing multiple logistic regression.

Results

During the 30-month period, 4863 (91.2%) of the total 5333 recommendations were accepted. Factors associated with a higher odds of acceptance in multivariable analysis were recommendations for antimicrobial dose/frequency adjustment (odds ratio [OR], 2.63; 95% CI, 1.6–4.3) and order for labs/tests (OR, 3.30; 95% CI, 2.1–5.2), while recommendations for antimicrobial de-escalation (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60–0.95) and antimicrobial discontinuation (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42–0.76) were associated with lower odds of acceptance. Female physicians were more likely to accept recommendations compared with males (93.1% vs 90.3% acceptance; OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.3–2.2). Compared with physicians with <3 years of experience, who had the highest acceptance rate (96.3%), physicians with ≥21 years of experience had the lowest (87.1%; OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15–0.45).

Conclusions

TeleASP recommendations were accepted at a high rate. Acceptance rates were higher among female physicians, and recommendations to stop or de-escalate antimicrobials led to lower acceptance. Recommendations made to the most experienced physicians were the least accepted, which may be an important factor for stewardship programs to consider in education and intervention efforts.

Private Practice Dentists Improve Antibiotic Use After Dental Antibiotic Stewardship Education From Infectious Diseases Experts

Background

Private practice dentists represent 72% of United States dentists. We conducted a prospective cohort study of private practice dentists comparing antibiotic use before and after dental antibiotic stewardship education by infectious diseases (ID) antibiotic stewardship experts.

Methods

Study phases were as follows: phase 1 (preeducation), 3 months of retrospective antibiotic data and a presurvey assessed baseline antibiotic knowledge; phase 2 (education), dentists attended 3 evening Zoom sessions; phase 3, (posteducation/interventions), 3 months of prospective audits with weekly feedback; phase 4, postsurvey and recommendations to reach more dentists.

Results

Fifteen dentists participated. Ten had practiced >20 years. Presurvey, 14 were unfamiliar with dental stewardship. The number of antibiotic prescriptions pre/post decreased from 2124 to 1816 (P < .00001), whereas procedures increased from 8526 to 9063. Overall, appropriate use (prophylaxis and treatment) increased from 19% pre to 87.9% post (P < .0001). Appropriate prophylaxis was 46.6% pre and 76.7% post (P < .0001). Joint implant prophylaxis decreased from 164 pre to 78 post (P < .0001). Appropriate treatment antibiotics pre/post improved 5-fold from 15% to 90.2% (P = .0001). Antibiotic duration pre/post decreased from 7.7 days (standard deviation [SD], 2.2 days) to 5.1 days (SD, 1.6 days) (P < .0001). Clindamycin use decreased 90% from 183 pre to 18 post (P < .0001). Postsurvey responses recommended making antibiotic stewardship a required annual continuing education. Study participants invited ID antibiotic stewardship experts to teach an additional 2125 dentists via dental study clubs.

Conclusions

After learning dental antibiotic stewardship from ID antibiotic stewardship experts, dentists rapidly optimized antibiotic prescribing. Private practice dental study clubs are expanding dental antibiotic stewardship training to additional dentists, hygienists, and patients across the United States.

Implementation of a β-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring program: Experience from a large academic medical center

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

To describe the implementation and operationalization of a β-lactam (BL) therapeutic drug monitoring(TDM) program at a large academic center.

SUMMARY

BLs are the most used class of antibiotics. Suboptimal antibiotic exposure is a significant concern in hospitalized patients, particularly in those with altered pharmacokinetics. BL-TDM provides clinicians the opportunity to optimize drug concentrations to ensure maximal therapeutic efficacy while minimizing toxicity. However, BL-TDM has not been widely adopted due to the lack of access to assays. The University of Florida Shands Hospital developed a BL-TDM program in 2015. This is a consultative service primarily run by pharmacists and is conducted in all patient care areas. An analysis was performed on the first BL-TDM encounter for 1,438 patients. BL-TDM was most frequently performed for cefepime (61%, n = 882), piperacillin (15%, n = 218), and meropenem (11%, n = 151). BL-TDM was performed a median of 3 days (interquartile range, 1-5 days) from BL initiation. Among patients with available minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and trough concentrations, the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target of 100% fT>MIC was attained in 308 patients (88%). BL-TDM resulted in a dosage adjustment in 25% (n = 361) of patients.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a BL-TDM program requires the concerted efforts of physicians, pharmacists, nursing staff, phlebotomists, and personnel in the analytical laboratory. Standard antibiotic dosing failed to achieve optimal PK/PD targets in all patients; utilizing BL-TDM, dose adjustments were made in 1 of every 4 patients.

A Desirability of Outcome Ranking Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Seven Versus Fourteen Days of Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infection

Background

Although a short course (7 days) of antibiotics has been demonstrated to be noninferior to a conventional course (14 days) in terms of mortality and infectious complications for patients with a Gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infection (GNB), it is unknown whether a shorter treatment duration can provide a better overall clinical outcome.

Methods

We applied a bloodstream infection-specific desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) analysis to the results of a previously completed, randomized controlled trial comparing short versus conventional course antibiotic therapy for hospitalized patients with uncomplicated GNB. We determined the probability that a randomly selected participant in the short course group would have a more desirable overall outcome than a participant in the conventional duration group. We performed (1) partial credit analyses allowing for calculated and variable weighting of DOOR ranks and (2) subgroup analyses to elucidate which patients may benefit the most from short durations of therapy.

Results

For the 604 patients included in the original study (306 short course, 298 conventional course), the probability of having a more desirable outcome with a short course of antibiotics compared with a conventional course was 51.1% (95% confidence interval, 46.7% to 55.4%), indicating no significant difference. Partial credit analyses indicated that the DOOR results were similar across different patient preferences. Prespecified subgroup analyses using DOOR did not reveal significant differences between short and conventional courses of therapy.

Conclusions

Both short and conventional durations of antibiotic therapy provide comparable clinical outcomes when using DOOR to consider benefits and risks of treatment options for GNB.

Optimizing antibiotic therapies to reduce the risk of bacterial resistance

The incidence of infections caused by bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics is constantly increasing. In Europe alone, it has been estimated that each year about 33'000 deaths are attributable to such infections. One important driver of antimicrobial resistance is the use and abuse of antibiotics in human medicine. Inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics is still very frequent: up to 50% of all antimicrobials prescribed in humans might be unnecessary and several studies show that at least 50% of antibiotic treatments are inadequate, depending on the setting. Possible strategies to optimize antibiotic use in everyday clinical practice and to reduce the risk of inducing bacterial resistance include: the implementation of rapid microbiological diagnostics for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, the use of inflammation markers to guide initiation and duration of therapies, the reduction of standard durations of antibiotic courses, the individualization of antibiotic therapies and dosing considering pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics targets, and avoiding antibiotic classes carrying a higher risk for induction of bacterial resistance. Importantly, measures to improve antibiotic prescribing and antibiotic stewardship programs should focus on facilitating clinical reasoning and improving prescribing environment in order to remove any barriers to good prescribing.

Antimicrobial treatment duration for uncomplicated bloodstream infections in critically ill children: a multicentre observational study

Background

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) cause significant morbidity and mortality in critically ill children but treatment duration is understudied. We describe the durations of antimicrobial treatment that critically ill children receive and explore factors associated with treatment duration.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study in six pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) across Canada. Associations between treatment duration and patient-, infection- and pathogen-related characteristics were explored using multivariable regression analyses.

Results

Among 187 critically ill children with BSIs, the median duration of antimicrobial treatment was 15 (IQR 11–25) days. Median treatment durations were longer than two weeks for all subjects with known sources of infection: catheter-related 16 (IQR 11–24), respiratory 15 (IQR 11–26), intra-abdominal 20 (IQR 14–26), skin/soft tissue 17 (IQR 15–33), urinary 17 (IQR 15–35), central nervous system 33 (IQR 15–46) and other sources 29.5 (IQR 15–55) days. When sources of infection were unclear, the median duration was 13 (IQR 10–16) days. Treatment durations varied widely within and across PICUs. In multivariable linear regression, longer treatment durations were associated with severity of illness (+ 0.4 days longer [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1 to 0.7, p = 0.007] per unit increase in PRISM-IV) and central nervous system infection (+ 17 days [95% CI, 6.7 to 27.4], p = 0.001). Age and pathogen type were not associated with treatment duration.

Conclusions

Most critically ill children with BSIs received at least two weeks of antimicrobial treatment. Further study is needed to determine whether shorter duration therapy would be effective for selected critically ill children.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-022-03219-z.

Oral Is the New IV. Challenging Decades of Blood and Bone Infection Dogma: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine if controlled, prospective clinical data validate the long-standing belief that intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy is required for the full duration of treatment for 3 invasive bacterial infections: osteomyelitis, bacteremia, and infective endocarditis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of published, prospective, controlled trials that compared IV-only to oral stepdown regimens in the treatment of these diseases. Using the PubMed database, we identified 7 relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of osteomyelitis, 9 of bacteremia, 1 including both osteomyelitis and bacteremia, and 3 of endocarditis, as well as one quasi-experimental endocarditis study. Study results were synthesized via forest plots and funnel charts (for risk of study bias), using RevMan 5.4.1 and Meta-Essentials freeware, respectively.

RESULTS

The 21 studies demonstrated either no difference in clinical efficacy, or superiority of oral versus IV-only antimicrobial therapy, including for mortality; in no study was IV-only treatment superior in efficacy. The frequency of catheter-related adverse events and duration of inpatient hospitalization were both greater in IV-only groups.

DISCUSSION

Numerous prospective, controlled investigations demonstrate that oral antibiotics are at least as effective, safer, and lead to shorter hospitalizations than IV-only therapy; no contrary data were identified. Treatment guidelines should be modified to indicate that oral therapy is appropriate for reasonably selected patients with osteomyelitis, bacteremia, and endocarditis.

"Antibiotic hardstop" on electronic prescribing: impact on antimicrobial stewardship initiatives in patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and infective exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (IECOPD)

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains a major public health threat and the exploration of interventions which may reduce inappropriate antimicrobial use are of particular interest. An Antibiotic Hardstop (AH) was included within the eMeds system introduced to the Central Coast Local Health District (CCLHD) in 2018. The function allows prescribers to set a predetermined time at which antibiotic orders would cease. By default, the function set prescribed length to 5 days with a view to encourage prescribers to review existing antimicrobial orders and reduce inappropriate use.

METHODS

Records of adult inpatients prescribed broad spectrum antimicrobials with a registered indication of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) or an infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (IECOPD) between the 1st of March 2017 and 31st May 2017 for the pre eMeds cohort and 1st March 2019 and 31st May 2019 for the post eMeds cohort were randomly selected from our local health network's Guidance MS^® system. Baseline demographics, antimicrobial prescribing records and documented adverse events related to the AH function were collated/analysed. The days of therapy (DOT) and length of therapy (LOT) for each encounter were calculated manually and results analysed using a two-tailed t-test or Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Of patients eligible to have the AH function activated during their admission, 34% (n = 34) had the function deployed at least once. Following the introduction of eMeds mean DOT for the pooled indications cohort was reduced by 3.02 days (CI 95% 0.41-5.63, p < 0.05) and mean LOT by 1.97 days (CI 95% 0.39-3.55, p < 0.05). The hardstop function resulted in 2 cases of delayed or unintentionally ceased therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Following the introduction of electronic prescribing and AH, a significant reduction was observed in the DOT and LOT for antimicrobial use for inpatients with CAP and IECOPD without a significant increase in adverse events. Further research is required to determine the extent to which the AH functionality directly contributed to this effect and if the effect is present across a broader range of indications.

Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Canada During COVID-19

Dealing with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a monumental test of medical skills and resources worldwide. The management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) can at times be difficult, but treating CAP in the setting of COVID-19 can be particularly trying and confusing and raises a number of challenging questions relating to etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. This article is based on the authors’ experiences and presents an overview of how CAP during COVID-19 is handled in Canada. We touch on the issues of microbial etiology in patients with CAP in the setting of COVID-19 as well as diagnostic, site of care, and treatment approaches. Published guidelines are the basis of management of CAP and are discussed in the context of Canadian data. We also outline the usual treatment approaches to COVID-19, particularly in patients who have been hospitalized.

Early Antibiotic Discontinuation or De-escalation in High-Risk Patients With AML With Febrile Neutropenia and Prolonged Neutropenia

BACKGROUND

There is minimal data evaluating the safety of antibiotic de-escalation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with fever and ongoing neutropenia. Therefore, this study evaluated antibiotic prescribing, infection-related outcomes, and patient outcomes of an antibiotic de-escalation initiative.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This pre-post quasiexperimental study included adult patients with AML hospitalized with febrile neutropenia. An antibiotic de-escalation guideline was implemented in January 2017, which promoted de-escalation or discontinuation of intravenous antipseudomonal β-lactams. The primary outcome assessment was the incidence of bacterial infection in a historical control group before guideline implementation compared with an intervention group after guideline implementation.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients were included. Antibiotic de-escalation occurred more frequently in the intervention group (71.7% vs 7.5%; P<.001), which resulted in fewer days of therapy for intravenous antipseudomonal β-lactams (14 vs 25 days; P<.001). Thirty-day all-cause mortality and length of hospitalization were not different between groups. However, the intervention group had significantly fewer episodes of Clostridioides difficile colitis (5.7% vs 27.5%; P=.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an antibiotic de-escalation guideline resulted in decreased use of intravenous antipseudomonal β-lactams and fewer episodes of C difficile colitis, without adversely impacting patient outcomes. Additional studies are needed, preferably in the form of randomized controlled trials, to confirm these results.

Decalogue for the selection of oral antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infections

Lower respiratory tract infections, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (COPD-E) and community acquired pneumonia (CAP), are one of the most frequent reasons for consultation in primary care and hospital emergency departments, and are the cause of a high prescription of antimicrobial agents. The selection of the most appropriate oral antibiotic treatment is based on different aspects and includes to first consider a bacterial aetiology and not a viral infection, to know the bacterial pathogen that most frequently cause these infections and the frequency of their local antimicrobial resistance. Treatment should also be prescribed quickly and antibiotics should be selected among those with a quicker mode of action, achieving the greatest effect in the shortest time and with the fewest adverse effects (toxicity, interactions, resistance and/or ecological impact). Whenever possible, antimicrobials should be rotated and diversified and switched to the oral route as soon as possible. With these premises, the oral treatment guidelines for mild or moderate COPD-E and CAP in Spain include as first options beta-lactam antibiotics (amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate and cefditoren), in certain situations associated with a macrolide, and relegating fluoroquinolones as an alternative, except in cases where the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is suspected.

Florence Nightingale and Antimicrobial Stewardship

Following the uniquely coincident Year of the Nurse and the year of the pandemic, striking similarities between the principles and innovations that Florence Nightingale introduced to nursing and the inclusion of nurses in the pursuit of antimicrobial stewardship have become evident. Issues of universal healthcare, the treatment of infections, workforce collaboration, and quality of care are as critical in the 21st century as they were in Nightingale's lifetime. The importance of nursing involvement in each of these areas is compared and discussed with their relevance to past, present, and future healthcare.

Hyperoxemia in postsurgical sepsis/septic shock patients is associated with reduced mortality

BACKGROUND

Despite growing interest in treatment strategies that limit oxygen exposure in ICU patients, no studies have compared conservative oxygen with standard oxygen in postsurgical patients with sepsis/septic shock, although there are indications that it may improve outcomes. It has been proven that high partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) reduces the rate of surgical-wound infections and mortality in patients under major surgery. The aim of this study is to examine whether PaO2 is associated with risk of death in adult patients with sepsis/septic shock after major surgery.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study in 454 patients who underwent major surgery admitted into a single ICU. Patients were stratified in two groups whether they had hyperoxemia, defined as PaO2 > 100 mmHg (n = 216), or PaO2 ≤ 100 mmHg (n = 238) at the day of sepsis/septic shock onset according to SEPSIS-3 criteria maintained during 48 h. Primary end-point was 90-day mortality after diagnosis of sepsis. Secondary endpoints were ICU length of stay and time to extubation.

RESULTS

In patients with PaO2 ≤ 100 mmHg, we found prolonged mechanical ventilation (2 [8] vs. 1 [4] days, p < 0.001), higher ICU stay (8 [13] vs. 5 [9] days, p < 0.001), higher organ dysfunction as assessed by SOFA score (9 [3] vs. 7 [5], p < 0.001), higher prevalence of septic shock (200/238, 84.0% vs 145/216) 67.1%, p < 0.001), and higher 90-day mortality (37.0% [88] vs. 25.5% [55], p = 0.008). Hyperoxemia was associated with higher probability of 90-day survival in a multivariate analysis (OR 0.61, 95%CI: 0.39-0.95, p = 0.029), independent of age, chronic renal failure, procalcitonin levels, and APACHE II score > 19. These findings were confirmed when patients with severe hypoxemia at the time of study inclusion were excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxygenation with a PaO2 above 100 mmHg was independently associated with lower 90-day mortality, shorter ICU stay and intubation time in critically ill postsurgical sepsis/septic shock patients. Our findings open a new venue for designing clinical trials to evaluate the boundaries of PaO2 in postsurgical patients with severe infections.

Two-day versus seven-day course of levofloxacin in acute COPD exacerbation: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Duration of antibiotic treatment in acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is most commonly based on expert opinion. Typical administration periods range from 5 to 7 days. A 2-day course with levofloxacin was not previously assessed. We performed a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of 2-day versus 7-day treatment with levofloxacin in patients with AECOPD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Patients with AECOPD were randomized to receive levofloxacin for 2 days and 5 days placebo (n = 155) or levofloxacin for 7 days (n = 155). All patients received a common dose of intravenous prednisone daily for 5 days. The primary outcome measure was cure rate, and secondary outcomes included need for additional antibiotics, ICU admission rate, re-exacerbation rate, death rate, and exacerbation-free interval (EFI) within 1-year follow-up. The study protocol has been prepared in accordance with the revised Helsinki Declaration for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects and Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. The study was approved by ethics committees of all participating centers prior to implementation (Monastir and Sousse Universities).

RESULTS

310 patients were randomized to receive 2-day course of levofloxacin (n = 155) or 7-day course (n = 155). Cure rate was 79.3% (n = 123) and 74.2% (n = 115), respectively, in 2-day and 7-day groups [OR 1.3; 95% CI 0.78-2.2 (p = 0.28)]. Need for additional antibiotics rate was 3.2% and 1.9% in the 2-day group and 7-day group, respectively; (p = 0.43). ICU admission rate was not significantly different between both groups. One-year re-exacerbation rate was 34.8% (n = 54) in 2-day group versus 29% (n = 45) in 7-day group (p = 0.19); the EFI was 121 days (interquartile range, 99-149) versus 110 days (interquartile range, 89-132) in 2-day and 7-day treatment groups, respectively; (p = 0.73). One-year death rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups, 5.2% versus 7.1% in the 2-day group and 7-day group, respectively; (p = 0.26). No difference in adverse effects was detected.

CONCLUSION

Levofloxacin once daily for 2 days is not inferior to 7 days with respect to cure rate, need for additional antibiotics and hospital readmission in AECOPD. Our findings would improve patient compliance and reduce the incidence of bacterial resistance and adverse effects.

Description of antibiotic use variability among US nursing homes using electronic health record data

Background

Antibiotics are frequently prescribed in nursing homes; national data describing facility-level antibiotic use are lacking. The objective of this analysis was to describe variability in antibiotic use in nursing homes across the United States using electronic health record orders.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of antibiotic orders for 309,884 residents in 1,664 US nursing homes in 2016 were included in the analysis. Antibiotic use rates were calculated as antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 resident days and were compared by type of stay (short stay ≤100 days vs long stay >100 days). Prescribing indications and the duration of nursing home-initiated antibiotic orders were described. Facility-level correlations of antibiotic use, adjusting for resident health and facility characteristics, were assessed using multivariate linear regression models.

Results

In 2016, 54% of residents received at least 1 systemic antibiotic. The overall rate of antibiotic use was 88 DOT per 1,000 resident days. The 3 most common antibiotic classes prescribed were fluoroquinolones (18%), cephalosporins (18%), and urinary anti-infectives (9%). Antibiotics were most frequently prescribed for urinary tract infections, and the median duration of an antibiotic course was 7 days (interquartile range, 5-10). Higher facility antibiotic use rates correlated positively with higher proportions of short-stay residents, for-profit ownership, residents with low cognitive performance, and having at least 1 resident on a ventilator. Available facility-level characteristics only predicted a small proportion of variability observed (Model R2 version 0.24 software).

Conclusions

Using electronic health record orders, variability was found among US nursing-home antibiotic prescribing practices, highlighting potential opportunities for targeted improvement of prescribing practices.

Duration of antibiotic therapy for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a review of recent evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms, impact on intestinal microbiome, side effects and hospital costs are some of the factors that have encouraged multiple studies over the past two decades to evaluate different duration of antibiotic therapy with the goal of shorter but effective regimens. Here, we reviewed the most recent relevant data on the duration of therapy focused on two of the most common Gram-negative organisms in clinical practice, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies including meta-analysis confirm that short antibiotic courses for both Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa infections have comparable clinical outcomes to longer courses of therapy. Despite the advocacy for short-course therapy in contemporary guidelines, recent evidence in the USA has revealed a high prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic usage due to excessive duration of therapy.

SUMMARY

Although the decision process regarding the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy is multifactorial, the vast majority of infections other than endocardial or bone and joint, can be treated with short-course antibiotic therapy (i.e., ≤7 days). The combination of biomarkers, clinical response to therapy, and microbiologic clearance help determine the optimal duration in patients with infections caused by P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales.

Hospital Discharge: An Opportune Time for Antimicrobial Stewardship

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30% of antimicrobials prescribed in the outpatient setting are unnecessary and up to 50% are inappropriate. Despite this, antimicrobial stewardship (AS) efforts mostly focus on the inpatient setting, and limited data describe AS interventions at hospital discharge. Acknowledging the potential value of discharge AS, we used our existing resources to review discharge oral antimicrobial prescriptions.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this retrospective, single-center study was to evaluate the impact of an AS program on discharge oral antimicrobial prescriptions.

METHODS

Discharge oral antimicrobial prescriptions sent to our hospital-operated outpatient pharmacy, reviewed by an infectious diseases (ID) pharmacist, and recorded into our data collection tool from September 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021, were evaluated retrospectively. The primary outcome was to identify the frequency a drug-related problem (DRP) was identified by an ID pharmacist. Secondary outcomes included DRP characterization, percentage of prescriptions with interventions, intervention acceptance rate, and reduction in antimicrobial days dispensed at discharge when interventions to limit treatment duration were accepted.

RESULTS

Of the 803 discharge oral antimicrobial prescriptions reviewed, at least 1 DRP was identified in 43.1% (346/803). The most frequently identified DRPs pertained to treatment duration, drug selection, and dose selection. At least 1 intervention was recommended in 42.8% (344/803) of prescriptions. In total, 438 interventions were made and the acceptance rate was 75.6% (331/438). The most common types of interventions included recommendations for a different duration, a different dose or frequency, and antimicrobial discontinuation. When interventions to reduce treatment duration were accepted, the median (interquartile range) number of antimicrobial days decreased from 8 (5-10) days to 4 (0-5.5) days (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

An ID pharmacist's review of discharge oral antimicrobial prescriptions sent to our hospital-operated outpatient pharmacy resulted in identification of DRPs and subsequent interventions in a substantial number of prescriptions.

In Vitro Killing of Canine Urinary Tract Infection Pathogens by Ampicillin, Cephalexin, Marbofloxacin, Pradofloxacin, and Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole

Urinary tract infections are common in dogs, necessitating antimicrobial therapy. We determined the speed and extent of in vitro killing of canine urinary tract infection pathogens by five antimicrobial agents (ampicillin, cephalexin, marbofloxacin, pradofloxacin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) following the first 3 h of drug exposure. Minimum inhibitory and mutant prevention drug concentrations were determined for each strain. In vitro killing was determined by exposing bacteria to clinically relevant drug concentrations and recording the log10 reduction and percent kill in viable cells at timed intervals. Marbofloxacin and pradofloxacin killed more bacterial cells, and faster than other agents, depending on the time of sampling and drug concentration. Significant differences were seen between drugs for killing Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strains. At the maximum urine drug concentrations, significantly more E. coli cells were killed by marbofloxacin than by ampicillin (p < 0.0001), cephalexin (p < 0.0001), and TMP/SMX (p < 0.0001) and by pradofloxacin than by cephalexin (p < 0.0001) and TMP/SMX (p < 0.0001), following 5 min of drug exposure. Rapid killing of bacteria should inform thinking on drug selection for short course therapy for uncomplicated UTIs, without compromising patient care, and is consistent with appropriate antimicrobial use and stewardship principles.