Impact of nutritional vitamin D supplementation on parathyroid hormone and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis

Vitamin D: an important treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease?

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is one of the most common complications of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Vitamin D levels begin to decrease in the early stages of CKD, and these vitamin D-related changes play a central role in the occurrence and development of SHPT. Vitamin D-based drugs, which inhibit parathyroid hormone secretion either directly or indirectly, are commonly used to treat SHPT. However, vitamin D-based drugs can also lead to a dysregulated balance between serum calcium and phosphorus, as well as other adverse reactions. Over the past several decades, researchers have conducted in-depth studies on the pathogenesis of SHPT, developed new vitamin D-based drugs, and explored combinatory methods to improve treatment efficacy for the disease. Here, we review vitamin D metabolism, the diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency in patients with CKD, the pathogenesis of SHPT, the pharmacological effects of vitamin D drugs, and the benefits and side effects of using vitamin D to treat SHPT.

Pathophysiology and therapies of CKD-associated secondary hyperparathyroidism

Uremic secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHP) refers to the biochemical abnormalities that characterize CKD-MBD. However, historically parathyroid hormone (PTH) is identified as the key culprit hormone and the essential biomarker of secondary hyperparathyroidism. SHP represents the adaptive response to several mineral abnormalities that initiate and maintain increased PTH secretion through classical mineral derangements and more recently elucidated hormonal dysregulations. Among classic factors involved in the pathogenesis of SHP, phosphate, calcium, and calcitriol have a prominent role. The discovery of new pathogenetic factors involved in the development of SHP (and the eventual CKD-MBD) including fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23) and klotho provides new hypothesis and perspectives to our understanding of this complex metabolic disturbance. Recently more than serum phosphate a critical role in regulating FGF23 synthesis and the progression of CKD is ascribed to phosphate pool, reflected by production of glycerol-3-phosphate and the formation of excessive CPP-2. Finally, also skeletal resistance to PTH action, due to dysregulation of the Wnt-β-catenin system and intestinal dysbiosis, affecting the PTH actions on bone are causal factor of SHP. Identifying all the actors at play is mandatory to allow the most precise therapeutic prescription in the individual patient. This paper aims to review, in particular, the pathophysiology of SHP, which is essential to envisage the eventual therapeutic options for the associated MBD.

Vitamin D: are all compounds equal?

Vitamin D is a pre-hormone essential for maintaining mineral homeostasis and also plays significant roles in bone, cardiovascular and renal health. Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in the general population, and even more so in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, in which it contributes to the development and progression of mineral and bone disorder. The landscape of vitamin D treatment has evolved, with several analogues now available, each possessing distinct pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, efficacies and safety profiles. This diversity allows for tailored, personalized approaches to treatment in CKD patients. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of vitamin D, including its natural sources and metabolism, and examines the main available pharmacological vitamin D products. Particular emphasis is placed on their application in CKD management, highlighting how these compounds can be strategically used to address both vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism, while also acknowledging the ongoing debate about their impact on bone health and other clinical outcomes.

Persistent uncertainties in optimal treatment approaches of secondary hyperparathyroidism and hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review is a critical analysis of treatment results obtained in clinical trials conducted in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), hyperphosphatemia, or both.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with CKD have a high mortality rate. The disorder of mineral and bone metabolism (CKD-MBD), which is commonly present in these patients, is associated with adverse outcomes, including cardiovascular events and mortality. Clinical trials aimed at improving these outcomes by modifying CKD-MBD associated factors have most often resulted in disappointing results. The complexity of CKD-MBD, where many players are closely interconnected, might explain these negative findings. We first present an historical perspective of current knowledge in the field of CKD-MBD and then examine potential flaws of past and ongoing clinical trials targeting SHPT and hyperphosphatemia respectively in patients with CKD.

Sustained Reduction of Elevated Intact Parathyroid Hormone Concentrations with Extended-Release Calcifediol Slows Chronic Kidney Disease Progression in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Patients

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) drives onerous human and healthcare costs, underscoring an urgent need to avert disease progression. Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) develops as CKD advances, and persistently elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) may be nephrotoxic and associated with earlier dialysis onset. This study examines, for the first time, the hypothesis that sustained reduction of elevated intact PTH (iPTH) with extended-release calcifediol (ERC) reduces the nephrotoxic impact of SHPT and forestalls renal decline.

METHODS

Changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were analyzed post hoc in 126 adults with SHPT, stage 3-4 CKD, and low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) treated for 1 year with ERC in pivotal trials. ERC was administered at 30 μg/day increasing, as needed, to 60 μg/day to achieve ≥30% reductions in iPTH. Calcium, phosphorus, 25D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25D), iPTH, eGFR, fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23), bone turnover markers (BTMs), and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) were measured at baseline and regular intervals. Participants were categorized by achievement (or not) of sustained ≥30% iPTH reductions over the last 2 quarters of treatment to evaluate differences in eGFR decline.

RESULTS

For all participants, 25D increased 58.5 ± 2.3 (SE) ng/mL (p < 0.001) by the end of treatment (EOT), 1,25D increased 10.1 ± 1.8 pg/mL (p < 0.001), iPTH decreased from 143.8 ± 5.8 pg/mL to 108.8 ± 7.2 (p < 0.001), BTMs improved (p < 0.01), and eGFR declined 2.2 ± 0.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p < 0.001). The rate of eGFR decline was >5-fold higher (p = 0.014) in participants who did not achieve sustained iPTH reductions of ≥30% (3.2 ± 0.7; 12.7 ± 2.2%) than in those who did (0.6 ± 0.8; 2.9 ± 2.4%). It was highest in the 30 participants who did not exhibit an iPTH lowering response in both of the last 2 quarters of treatment (5.4 ± 0.9; 20.9 ± 3.4%). Duration of iPTH reduction had no impact on safety parameters. Degree of iPTH reduction at EOT was also associated with slower CKD progression.

CONCLUSION

Sustained reduction of elevated iPTH with ERC treatment was associated with slower rates of eGFR decline in patients with SHPT and stage 3-4 CKD without raising safety concerns. A prospective trial is warranted to confirm this finding.

Native vitamin D in CKD and renal transplantation: meaning and rationale for its supplementation

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a significant epidemiological challenge, necessitating effective patient management strategies. Nutritional intervention, particularly vitamin D supplementation, has garnered attention for its potential therapeutic utility in CKD. Despite widespread acknowledgment of the importance of vitamin D, particularly in bone and mineral metabolism, its supplementation in CKD patients for non-skeletal purposes remains contentious due to limited evidence. Hypovitaminosis D linked with CKD substantially contributes to disturbances in mineral and bone metabolism, increasing the risks of cardiovascular complications and skeletal disorders. Notably, CKD patients experience progressive vitamin D deficiency, exacerbating as the disease progresses. Guidelines recommend monitoring 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25 (OH)-D) levels due to their correlation with mineral metabolism parameters, although robust evidence for recommending supplementation is lacking. The primary aim of this paper is to focus on the main open questions regarding vitamin D supplementation in CKD, reporting the current evidence concerning the role of vitamin D supplementation in CKD and in renal transplant recipients.

Vitamin Supplement Use in Patients With CKD: Worth the Pill Burden?

All vitamins play essential roles in various aspects of body function and systems. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including those receiving dialysis, may be at increased risk of developing vitamin deficiencies due to anorexia, poor dietary intake, protein energy wasting, restricted diet, dialysis loss, or inadequate sun exposure for vitamin D. However, clinical manifestations of most vitamin deficiencies are usually subtle or undetected in this population. Testing for circulating levels is not undertaken for most vitamins except folate, B12, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D because assays may not be available or may be costly to perform and do not always correlate with body stores. The last systematic review through 2016 was performed for the Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI) 2020 Nutrition Guideline update, so this article summarizes the more recent evidence. We review the use of vitamins supplementation in the CKD population. To date there have been no randomized trials to support the benefits of any vitamin supplementation for kidney, cardiovascular, or patient-centered outcomes. The decision to supplement water-soluble vitamins should be individualized, taking account the patient's dietary intake, nutritional status, risk of vitamins deficiency/insufficiency, CKD stage, comorbid status, and dialysis loss. Nutritional vitamin D deficiency should be corrected, but the supplementation dose and formulation need to be personalized, taking into consideration the degree of 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency, parathyroid hormone levels, CKD stage, and local formulation. Routine supplementation of vitamins A and E is not supported due to potential toxicity. Although more trial data are required to elucidate the roles of vitamin supplementation, all patients with CKD should undergo periodic assessment of dietary intake and aim to receive various vitamins through natural food sources and a healthy eating pattern that includes vitamin-dense foods.

[Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with chronic kidney disease : Joint guidelines of the Austrian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ÖGKM), the Austrian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ÖGPMR) and the Austrian Society of Nephrology (ÖGN)]

DEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGY

Chronic kidney disease (CKD): abnormalities of kidney structure or function, present for over 3 months. Staging of CKD is based on GFR and albuminuria (not graded). Osteoporosis: compromised bone strength (low bone mass, disturbance of microarchitecture) predisposing to fracture. By definition, osteoporosis is diagnosed if the bone mineral density T‑score is ≤ -2.5. Furthermore, osteoporosis is diagnosed if a low-trauma (inadequate trauma) fracture occurs, irrespective of the measured T‑score (not graded). The prevalence of osteoporosis, osteoporotic fractures and CKD is increasing worldwide (not graded). PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE-MINERAL AND BONE DISORDER (CKD-MBD): Definition of CKD-MBD: a systemic disorder of mineral and bone metabolism due to CKD manifested by either one or a combination of the following: abnormalities of calcium, phosphorus, PTH, or vitamin D metabolism; renal osteodystrophy; vascular calcification (not graded). Increased, normal or decreased bone turnover can be found in renal osteodystrophy (not graded). Depending on CKD stage, routine monitoring of calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, PTH and 25-OH-vitamin D is recommended (2C). Recommendations for treatment of CKD-MBD: Avoid hypercalcemia (1C). In cases of hyperphosphatemia, lower phosphorus towards normal range (2C). Keep PTH within or slightly above normal range (2D). Vitamin D deficiency should be avoided and treated when diagnosed (1C).

DIAGNOSIS AND RISK STRATIFICATION OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN CKD

Densitometry (using dual X‑ray absorptiometry, DXA): low T‑score correlates with increased fracture risk across all stages of CKD (not graded). A decrease of the T‑score by 1 unit approximately doubles the risk for osteoporotic fracture (not graded). A T-score ≥ -2.5 does not exclude osteoporosis (not graded). Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine measured by DXA can be increased and therefore should not be used for the diagnosis or monitoring of osteoporosis in the presence of aortic calcification, osteophytes or vertebral fracture (not graded). FRAX can be used to aid fracture risk estimation in all stages of CKD (1C). Bone turnover markers can be measured in individual cases to monitor treatment (2D). Bone biopsy may be considered in individual cases, especially in patients with CKD G5 (eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73 m2) or CKD 5D (dialysis).

SPECIFIC TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH CKD

Hypocalcemia should be treated and serum calcium normalized before initiating osteoporosis therapy (1C). CKD G1-G2 (eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2): treat osteoporosis as recommended for the general population (1A). CKD G3-G5D (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 to dialysis): treat CKD-MBD first before initiating osteoporosis treatment (2C). CKD G3 (eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2) with PTH within normal limits and osteoporotic fracture and/or high fracture risk according to FRAX: treat osteoporosis as recommended for the general population (2B). CKD G4-5 (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) with osteoporotic fracture (secondary prevention): Individualized treatment of osteoporosis is recommended (2C). CKD G4-5 (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) and high fracture risk (e.g. FRAX score > 20% for a major osteoporotic fracture or > 5% for hip fracture) but without prevalent osteoporotic fracture (primary prevention): treatment of osteoporosis may be considered and initiated individually (2D). CKD G4-5D (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 to dialysis): Calcium should be measured 1-2 weeks after initiation of antiresorptive therapy (1C).

PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION

Resistance training prioritizing major muscle groups thrice weekly (1B). Aerobic exercise training for 40 min four times per week (1B). Coordination and balance exercises thrice weekly (1B). Flexibility exercise 3-7 times per week (1B).

The clinical relevance of native vitamin D in pediatric kidney disease

Hypovitaminosis D has been reported to be common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) as well as in proteinuric disorders. We reviewed available evidence to assess clinically relevant effects of low vitamin D status and native vitamin D (NVD) therapy, in pediatric renal diseases. Online medical databases were searched for articles related to vitamin D status, associations of hypovitaminosis D and effects of NVD therapy in kidney disease. Hypovitaminosis D was associated with worse skeletal, cardiovascular, inflammatory, and renal survival outcomes in CKD. Low serum 25 hydroxy-vitamin D (25[OH]D) levels correlated positively with glomerular filtration rate and negatively with serum parathyroid (PTH) levels. However, to date, evidence of benefit of NVD supplementation is restricted mainly to improvements in serum PTH, and biochemical 25[OH]D targets form the basis of clinical practice recommendations for NVD therapy. In nephrotic syndrome (NS) relapse, studies indicate loss of 25[OH]D along with vitamin D binding protein in urine, and serum total 25[OH]D levels are low. Preliminary evidence indicates that free 25[OH]D may be a better guide to the biologically active fraction. NVD therapy in NS does not show consistent results in improving skeletal outcomes and hypercalciuria has been reported when total 25[OH]D levels were considered as indication for therapy. NVD formulations should be regularised, and therapy monitored adequately to avoid adverse effects.

Vitamin D and Chronic Kidney Disease Association with Mineral and Bone Disorder: An Appraisal of Tangled Guidelines

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a highly prevalent condition worldwide in which the kidneys lose many abilities, such as the regulation of vitamin D (VD) metabolism. Moreover, people with CKD are at a higher risk of multifactorial VD deficiency, which has been extensively associated with poor outcomes, including bone disease, cardiovascular disease, and higher mortality. Evidence is abundant in terms of the association of negative outcomes with low levels of VD, but recent studies have lowered previous high expectations regarding the beneficial effects of VD supplementation in the general population. Although controversies still exist, the diagnosis and treatment of VD have not been excluded from nephrology guidelines, and much data still supports VD supplementation in CKD patients. In this narrative review, we briefly summarize evolving controversies and useful clinical approaches, underscoring that the adverse effects of VD derivatives must be balanced against the need for effective prevention of progressive and severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. Guidelines vary, but there seems to be general agreement that VD deficiency should be avoided in CKD patients, and it is likely that one should not wait until severe SHPT is present before cautiously starting VD derivatives. Furthermore, it is emphasized that the goal should not be the complete normalization of parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. New developments may help us to better define optimal VD and PTH at different CKD stages, but large trials are still needed to confirm that VD and precise control of these and other CKD-MBD biomarkers are unequivocally related to improved hard outcomes in this population.

Real-World Analysis of Outcomes and Economic Burden in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease with and without Secondary Hyperparathyroidism among a Sample of the Italian Population

This real-world analysis evaluated the clinical and economic burden of non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients with and without secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) in Italy. An observational retrospective study was conducted using administrative databases containing a pool of healthcare entities covering 2.45 million health-assisted individuals. Adult patients with hospitalization discharge diagnoses for CKD stages 3, 4, and 5 were included from 1 January 2012 to 31 March 2015 and stratified using the presence/absence of sHPT. Of the 5710 patients, 3119 were CKD-only (62%) and 1915 were CKD + sHPT (38%). The groups were balanced using Propensity Score Matching (PSM). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that progression to dialysis and cumulative mortality had a higher incidence in the CKD + sHPT versus CKD-only group in CKD stage 3 patients and the overall population. The total direct healthcare costs/patient at one-year follow-up were significantly higher in CKD + sHPT versus CKD-only patients (EUR 8593 vs. EUR 5671, p < 0.001), mostly burdened by expenses for drugs (EUR 2250 vs. EUR 1537, p < 0.001), hospitalizations (EUR 4628 vs. EUR 3479, p < 0.001), and outpatient services (EUR 1715 vs. EUR 654, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that sHPT, even at an early CKD stage, results in faster progression to dialysis, increased mortality, and higher healthcare expenditures, thus indicating that timely intervention can ameliorate the management of CKD patients affected by sHPT.

Effects of Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Cardiovascular and Cancer Outcomes by eGFR in VITAL

Background

Reduced 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) metabolism and secondary hyperparathyroidism are common with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and may contribute to cardiovascular disease and cancer risk.

Methods

We assessed for heterogeneity by baseline eGFR of the effects of vitamin D3 on cardiovascular and cancer outcomes in the Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial (VITAL). Participants were randomized to 2000 IU vitamin D3 and/or 1 g Ω-3 fatty acids daily using a placebo-controlled, two-by-two factorial design (5.3 years follow-up). Primary study end points were incident major cardiovascular events and invasive cancer. Changes in serum 25(OH)D and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were examined.

Results

Baseline eGFR was available for 15,917 participants. Participants' mean age was 68 years, and 51% were women. Vitamin D3 resulted in higher serum 25(OH)D compared with placebo (difference in change 12.5 ng/ml; 95% CI, 12 to 13.1 ng/ml), without heterogeneity by eGFR (P interaction, continuous eGFR=0.2). Difference in change in PTH between vitamin D3 and placebo was larger with lower eGFR (P interaction=0.05): -6.9 (95% CI, -10.5 to -3.4), -5.8 (95% CI, -8.3 to -3.4), -4 (95% CI, -5.9 to -2.2), and -3.8 (95% CI, -5.6 to -2) pg/ml for eGFR <60, 60-74, 75-89, and ≥90 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. Effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on cardiovascular events (P interaction=0.61) and cancer (P interaction=0.89) did not differ by eGFR: HR=1.14 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.79), HR=1.06 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.5), HR=0.92 (95% CI, 0.67 to 1.25), and HR=0.92 (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.27) across eGFR categories for cardiovascular events and HR=1.63 (95% CI, 1.03 to 2.58), HR=0.85 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.11), HR=0.84 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.03), and 1.11 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.35) for cancer, respectively.

Conclusions

We observed no significant heterogeneity by baseline eGFR in the effects of vitamin D3 supplementation versus placebo on cardiovascular or cancer outcomes, despite effects on 25(OH)D and PTH concentrations.

Real-world assessment: effectiveness and safety of extended-release calcifediol and other vitamin D therapies for secondary hyperparathyroidism in CKD patients

Introduction

Extended-release calcifediol (ERC), active vitamin D hormones and analogs (AVD) and nutritional vitamin D (NVD) are commonly used therapies for treating secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in adults with stage 3–4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and vitamin D insufficiency (VDI). Their effectiveness for increasing serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) and reducing elevated plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH), the latter of which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, has varied across controlled clinical trials. This study aimed to assess real-world experience of ERC and other vitamin D therapies in reducing PTH and increasing 25D.

Methods

Medical records of 376 adult patients with stage 3–4 CKD and a history of SHPT and VDI from 15 United States (US) nephrology clinics were reviewed for up to 1 year pre- and post-ERC, NVD or AVD initiation. Key study variables included patient demographics, concomitant usage of medications and laboratory data. The mean age of the study population was 69.5 years, with gender and racial distributions representative of the US CKD population. Enrolled patients were grouped by treatment into three cohorts: ERC (n = 174), AVD (n = 55) and NVD (n = 147), and mean baseline levels were similar for serum 25D (18.8–23.5 ng/mL), calcium (Ca: 9.1–9.3 mg/dL), phosphorus (P: 3.7–3.8 mg/dL) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR: 30.3–35.7 mL/min/1.73m²). Mean baseline PTH was 181.4 pg/mL for the ERC cohort versus 156.9 for the AVD cohort and 134.8 pg/mL (p < 0.001) for the NVD cohort. Mean follow-up during treatment ranged from 20.0 to 28.8 weeks.

Results

Serum 25D rose in all cohorts (p < 0.001) during treatment. ERC yielded the highest increase (p < 0.001) of 23.7 ± 1.6 ng/mL versus 9.7 ± 1.5 and 5.5 ± 1.3 ng/mL for NVD and AVD, respectively. PTH declined with ERC treatment by 34.1 ± 6.6 pg/mL (p < 0.001) but remained unchanged in the other two cohorts. Serum Ca increased 0.2 ± 0.1 pg/mL (p < 0.001) with AVD but remained otherwise stable. Serum alkaline phosphatase remained unchanged.

Conclusions

Real-world clinical effectiveness and safety varied across the therapies under investigation, but only ERC effectively raised mean 25D (to well above 30 ng/mL) and reduced mean PTH levels without causing hypercalcemia.

Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in non-dialysis CKD: an appraisal 2022s

The situation of secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) in CKD patients not on dialysis (ND-CKD) is probably best characterised by the KDIGO CKD-MBD Update 2017 guideline 4.2.1 stating that the optimal PTH levels is not known in these stages. Furthermore, new caution became recommended with regard to the routine use of active vitamin D analogues in early CKD stages and moderate sHPT phenotypes, due to their potential risks for hypercalcaemia and hyperphosphataemia aggravation. Nevertheless, there is still a substantial clinical need to prevent the development of parathyroid gland autonomy with its associated consequences of bone and vascular damage including fracture risks and cardiovascular events. Therefore, we now attempt to review the current guideline-based and clinical practice management of sHPT in ND-CKD including their strengths and weaknesses, favouring individualised approaches respecting calcium and phosphate homeostasis. We further comment on extended-release calcifediol (ERC) as a new differential therapeutic option now also available in Europe, and on a potentially novel understanding of a required vitamin D saturation in more advanced CKD stages. There is no doubt, however, that knowledge gaps will remain in this issue unless powerful RCTs with hard and meaningful endpoints are performed.

Vitamin D and Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Critical Appraisal of the Past, Present, and the Future

The association between vitamin D deficiency and especially critical shortage of active vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, calcitriol) with the development of secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) is a well-known fact in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The association between sHPT and important clinical outcomes, such as kidney disease progression, fractures, cardiovascular events, and mortality, has turned the prevention and the control of HPT into a core issue of patients with CKD and on dialysis. However, vitamin D therapy entails the risk of unwanted side effects, such as hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia. This review summarizes the developments of vitamin D therapies in CKD patients of the last decades, from calcitriol substitution to extended-release calcifediol. In view of the study situation for vitamin D insufficiency and sHPT in CKD patients, we conclude that the nephrology community has to solve three core issues: (1) What is the optimal parathyroid hormone (PTH) target level for CKD and dialysis patients? (2) What is the optimal vitamin D level to support optimal PTH titration? (3) How can sHPT treatment support reduction in the occurrence of hard renal and cardiovascular events in CKD and dialysis patients?

Bone Fragility in Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 to 5: The Use of Vitamin D Supplementation

Frequently silent until advanced stages, bone fragility associated with chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disease (CKD-MBD) is one of the most devastating complications of CKD. Its pathophysiology includes the reduction of active vitamin D metabolites, phosphate accumulation, decreased intestinal calcium absorption, renal alpha klotho production, and elevated fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) levels. Altogether, these factors contribute firstly to secondary hyperparathyroidism, and ultimately, to micro- and macrostructural bone changes, which lead to low bone mineral density and an increased risk of fracture. A vitamin D deficiency is common in CKD patients, and low circulating 25(OH)D levels are invariably associated with high serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels as well as with bone mineralization defects, such as osteomalacia in case of severe forms. It is also associated with a variety of non-skeletal diseases, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis, cancer, and reduced immunological response. Current international guidelines recommend supplementing CKD patients with nutritional vitamin D as in the general population; however, there is no randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluating the effect of vitamin D (or vitamin D+calcium) supplementation on the risk of fracture in the setting of CKD. It is also unknown what level of circulating 25(OH)D would be sufficient to prevent bone abnormalities and fractures in these patients. The impact of vitamin D supplementation on other surrogate endpoints, including bone mineral density and bone-related circulating biomarkers (PTH, FGF23, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, sclerostin) has been evaluated in several RTCs; however, the results were not always translated into an improvement in long-term outcomes, such as reduced fracture risk. This review provides a brief and comprehensive update on CKD-related bone fragility and the use of natural vitamin D supplementation in these patients.

Vitamin D Effects on Bone Homeostasis and Cardiovascular System in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Renal Transplant Recipients

Poor vitamin D status is common in patients with impaired renal function and represents one main component of the complex scenario of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Therapeutic and dietary efforts to limit the consequences of uremia-associated vitamin D deficiency are a current hot topic for researchers and clinicians in the nephrology area. Evidence indicates that the low levels of vitamin D in patients with CKD stage above 4 (GFR < 15 mL/min) have a multifactorial origin, mainly related to uremic malnutrition, namely impaired gastrointestinal absorption, dietary restrictions (low-protein and low-phosphate diets), and proteinuria. This condition is further worsened by the compromised response of CKD patients to high-dose cholecalciferol supplementation due to the defective activation of renal hydroxylation of vitamin D. Currently, the literature lacks large and interventional studies on the so-called non-calcemic activities of vitamin D and, above all, the modulation of renal and cardiovascular functions and immune response. Here, we review the current state of the art of the benefits of supplementation with native vitamin D in various clinical settings of nephrological interest: CKD, dialysis, and renal transplant, with a special focus on the effects on bone homeostasis and cardiovascular outcomes.