Alterations in the microbial flora and in the incidence of bacteremia at a university hospital after adoption of amikacin as the sole formulary aminoglycoside

Upgrading antibiotic use within a class: tradeoff between resistance and treatment success

Increasing resistance to antibiotics creates the need for prudent antibiotic use. When resistance to various antibiotics within a class is driven by stepwise accumulation of mutations, a dilemma may exist in regard to replacing an antibiotic that is losing effectiveness due to resistance with a new drug within the same class. Such replacement may enhance treatment success in the short term but promote the spread of highly resistant strains. We used mathematical models to quantify the tradeoff between minimizing treatment failures (by switching early) and minimizing the proliferation of the highly resistant strain (by delaying the switch). Numerical simulations were applied to investigate the cumulative prevalence of the highly resistant strain (Resistance) and the cumulative number of treatment failures (Failure) that resulted from following different antibiotic use policies. Whereas never switching to the new drug always minimizes Resistance and maximizes Failure, immediate switching usually maximizes Resistance and minimizes Failure. Thus, in most circumstances, there is a strict tradeoff in which early use of the new drug enhances treatment effectiveness while hastening the rise of high-level resistance. This tradeoff is most acute when acquired resistance is rare and the highly resistant strain is readily transmissible. However, exceptions occur when use of the new drug frequently leads to acquired resistance and when the highly resistant strain has substantial "fitness cost"; these circumstances tend to favor an immediate switch. We discuss the implications of these considerations in regard to antibiotic choices for Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Impact of restricting fluoroquinolone prescription on bacterial resistance in an intensive care unit

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of reducing prescription of fluoroquinolones in an intensive care unit (ICU) upon bacterial resistance, particularly as regards Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For six months between January 2001 and June 2001, administration of fluoroquinolones was kept to a minimum. A bacteriological screening of patients was performed to assess the incidence of fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria. There was a 75.8% restriction in prescriptions of fluoroquinolones. There was no significant change in bacterial ecology between the periods preceding (12 months) and following (12 months) restriction. There was a significant recovery of sensitivity of P. aeruginosa to ciprofloxacin (P<or=0.01), with a decrease in resistant strains from 71.3% in the pre-restriction period to 52.4% in the post-restriction period. Regarding clinical data, no significant differences were noted between the pre-restriction and the post-restriction periods, except for the number of cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia with P. aeruginosa resistant to ciprofloxacin. This study demonstrated the possibility of introducing rotation of antibiotics in an ICU.

The Impact of Antibiotic Management on Resistance

The misguided presumption that a simple inverse relationship exists between the use of antibiotics and the emergence of bacterial resistance (i.e., increasing antibiotic use equals decreasing susceptibility and vice versa) has handicapped a full understanding of this relationship and perhaps efforts to bring resistance under control. In fact, this relationship is complicated. This article reviews factors that obscure detection of associations between antibiotic use and the emergence of resistance. It also provides a sample of the extensive data on this subject in the hope of encouraging the conduct of more sophisticated studies of the relationship between antibiotic use and the emergence of resistance. Such studies are necessary to provide institutions with the data they need to make informed decisions regarding antibiotic use.

Preventing antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in surgical patients

BACKGROUND

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has identified the control of antimicrobial resistance as an important effort to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with health care. Methods to prevent these infections in surgical patients have rarely been addressed specifically.

METHODS

The peer-reviewed literature and published guidelines were examined to identify proven or suggested techniques for controlling antimicrobial resistance that would be particularly relevant to surgeons and the surgical patient population.

RESULTS

A multi-step approach to the prevention of antimicrobial-resistant infections in surgical patients was developed. This program consists of four major strategies: Infection prevention, effective diagnosis and treatment of infection, optimal antibiotic utilization, and the prevention of transmission.

CONCLUSION

The control of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria is an important objective for all physicians, including surgeons. An approach to attain this goal in surgical populations is outlined. Further research will be needed to determine the value of these practices and to develop newer, even more effective interventions.

Bacterial resistance: origins, epidemiology, and impact

The basic mechanisms of antibacterial resistance are well known, but critical new aspects continue to be discovered. Recently discovered factors with major implications for the emergence, dissemination, and maintenance of resistance include multidrug efflux, hypermutability, integrons, and plasmid addiction. Some resistances are widespread and others local, with prevalence rates often worst in newly prosperous countries and in those specialist units where antibacterial use is heaviest. Multidrug-resistant epidemic strains are critical to the total accumulation of resistance (e.g., among Streptococcus pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae), but it remains unclear why some bacterial lineages achieve epidemic spread whereas others that are equally resistant do not. The correlation between in vitro resistance and treatment failure is imperfect, but resistance undoubtedly increases mortality, morbidity, and costs in many settings. Recent concern has led to a plethora of governmental and agency reports advocating less antibacterial use, better antibacterial use, better infection control, and the development of new antibacterials. The evidence that better prescribing can reduce resistance rates is mixed, and although changes to hospital regimens may reduce one resistance problem, other opportunistic bacteria may fill the vacant niche. Overall, the best that can reasonably be anticipated is an improved balance between the accumulation of resistance and new antibacterial development.

Rotating antibiotics in the intensive care unit: feasible, apparently beneficial, but questions remain

Rotating antibiotics in the intensive care unit may result in less infections caused by resistant organisms and in even less mortality. The selection of super-resistant organisms associated with the rotation strategy cannot be excluded, however, and many practical issues will have to be addressed before antibiotic rotation can be routinely recommended.

Antimicrobial cycling: the future or a fad?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the current evidence of the value of cycling of antimicrobials to control the emergence of resistance or to reverse existing resistance to antimicrobials.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were obtained through a MEDLiNE search of the English-language literature from 1966 to January 2000. Additionally, references from retrieved publications were reviewed to identify further articles.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All investigations of switching between or cycling among antimicrobials were evaluated. Studies switching between or cycling among specific drugs or classes of drugs within institutional settings were included in this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Studies involving cycling among different aminoglycosides suggest that, although temporary decreases in resistance can be documented, resistance usually rebounds rapidly on completion of the cycle and return to the original agent. Switching between classes of antimicrobials has produced inconsistent results and has been shown to replace resistance to one agent with resistance to another. Mathematical models using both in vitro and clinical data have suggested that, due to residual resistance in the population, cycling among drug classes is unlikely to yield long-term reductions in antimicrobial resistance, especially if a high level of antimicrobial resistance exists.

CONCLUSIONS

Cycling among different antimicrobials to reverse resistance trends is currently not supported by published literature. Cycling to prevent the emergence of resistance may ultimately be more useful; however, no studies have evaluated this concept. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to evaluate the potential clinical value of antimicrobialcycling.

Clinical aspects of antimicrobial resistance

Soon after penicillin was introduced into clinical use, an enzyme (penicillinase) that inactivated it was discovered. Since then, the variety of antimicrobial agents has increased substantially, along with a parallel increase in resistant pathogenic microorganisms. Resistance is now recognized against all available antimicrobial agents. Factors influencing the emergence of resistance include indiscriminate use of antibiotics, prolonged hospitalizations, increasing numbers of immunocompromised patients, and medical progress resulting in increased use of invasive procedures and devices. This article provides an update on clinical aspects of a few commonly found resistant microorganisms relevant to day-to-day clinical practice. A discussion of all resistant organisms is beyond the scope of this report. Both viral and mycobacterial resistance have been addressed in previous articles in this symposium.

A pilot study of antibiotic cycling in a hematology-oncology unit

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and treatment efficacy of cycling antibiotic regimens for prophylaxis or treatment of patients with profound neutropenia.

DESIGN

A prospective, nonrandomized, observational trial.

SETTING

A 20-bed adult hematology-oncology inpatient unit at a university referral hospital.

PATIENTS

Hospitalized adult patients with chemotherapy- or radiation-induced neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count less than 500 cells/mm3).

INTERVENTION

Between July 1994 and January 1996, 295 hospitalized patients were evaluated on an intent-to-treat basis for the cycling protocol. Of these, 271 were eligible and assigned to one of four antibiotic regimens being used at the time of enrollment: (1) ceftazidime+vancomycin; (2) imipenem; (3) aztreonam+cefazolin; (4) ciprofloxacin+clindamycin. Data on infection rates and types, and antibiotic resistance patterns, toxicity, and effectiveness were collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were excluded. Of the 271 evaluable patients, 123 (42%) were able to complete treatment on the assigned regimen. Of the 148 patients (50%) unable to do so, the reasons for failure included persistent fever (79%), breakthrough bacteremia (14%), and drug toxicity (7%). The antibiotic susceptibility profiles over the study period showed no increase in resistance. However, there was a marked increase in enterococcal infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show no significant increase in side effects or decrease in efficacy while cycling antibiotics among neutropenic patients and thus support further study of its role.

[Impact of initial antibiotic therapy on the course of resistance to fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides in Gram-negative bacilli isolated from intensive care patients]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of the initial antibiotic therapy associating a betalactam antibiotic (BLA) with either an aminoglycoside (AG) or a fluoroquinolone (FQ) on the development of resistance of gram-negative bacilli in an intensive care unit.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective bacteriological surveillance study.

PATIENTS

The study included 51 patients experiencing a second infection with gram-negative organisms, eight days or more after a first infection.

METHOD

The incidences of bacterial infection and the antimicrobial susceptibility have been assessed.

RESULTS

The first-choice therapy was based either on BLA + AG (51%), or on BLA + FQ in the others (46%). The causative organisms were Enterobacteriaceae (57%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (31%). The second infection occurred 23 +/- 11 days after the first. The main organisms involved were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (51%) and Enterobacteriaceae (41%). In the group treated initially with an AG, only the antibiotic susceptibility for amikacin decreased significantly (72 vs 36%, p < 0.05). The latter was the most prescribed antibiotic (56%). In the FQ group, there was a significant decrease of susceptibility for ciprofloxacin, pefloxacin, netilmicin and tobramycin. The decrease was not significant for gentamicin and amikacin.

CONCLUSIONS

In intensive care patients, the use of FQ in association with a BLA increases the resistance to AG and FQ. Therefore it seems preferable to administer an AG in association with a BLA. Amikacine should only be prescribed when justified for a given case.

Aminoglycoside resistance in Gram-negative blood isolates from various hospitals in Belgium and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Aminoglycoside Resistance Study Group

A total of 1102 consecutive clinical blood isolates, including 897 Enterobacteriaceae and 205 non-fermenting bacilli, were obtained from 13 university and university-affiliated hospitals, which were divided into a Northern and a Southern group. Resistance to gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin, amikacin and isepamicin was determined using a microdilution technique according to NCCLS procedures. The overall mean resistance level was 5.9% for gentamicin, 7.7% for tobramycin, 7.5% for netilmicin, 2.8% for amikacin and 1.2% for isepamicin. Resistance to amikacin and isepamicin was significantly higher in the Northern hospitals than in the Southern hospitals. In total, 157 isolates were found not to be susceptible to aminoglycosides. By PCR, 179 aminoglycoside resistance mechanisms, i.e. 150 genes encoding modifying enzymes and 29 permeability mechanisms, were detected in 148 isolates. A resistance mechanism could not be detected in nine isolates. Moreover, in a further 14 isolates the resistance profile was not fully explained by the detected genes. The aac(6')-I genes were found to be the most predominant resistance mechanism in both the Northern and Southern isolates, followed by aac(3) genes and permeability resistance. A total of 29 non-susceptible isolates harboured a combination of genes, 72.4% of which were a combination with the aac(6')-lb gene. The majority of these combinations were broad-spectrum combinations which represented 9.0% of the resistance mechanisms in non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae and 19.3% in the non-fermenting bacilli.

A review of the role of antibiotic policies in the control of antibiotic resistance

The optimal antibiotic control measures remain to be described and probably vary between institutions. Nevertheless, various control measures have been shown to be useful in reducing costs of therapy and total amounts of prescribing, while maintaining quality of care. More recently, interest has turned to whether antibiotic policies can reduce the spread of resistance and even reverse current high levels. Early studies indicated this was feasible, but mathematical models and the recent discovery of the role of transposons and integrons in multi-drug resistance have both cast doubt on likely future success in this area. Nevertheless, there have been some major successes in recent studies, both in the community and hospital. While cross-infection is a major impediment to control of resistance, there is little doubt that careful antibiotic prescribing can curtail the emergence and reduce the prevalence of resistance.

Resistance to amikacin and gentamicin among Gram-negative bloodstream isolates in a university hospital between 1989 and 1994

OBJECTIVE: To characterize antimicrobial resistance patterns to amikacin (AN) and gentamicin (GM) among Gram-negative bloodstream isolates and to determine the possible relationship between use of AN and GM and the occurrence of antibiotic resistance during a 6-year period. METHODS: Standard media and techniques of isolation and identification were used. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with the disk diffusion method and API rapid ATB E strips. Data on consumption of aminoglycosides were collected by the central hospital pharmacy and were expressed as daily defined doses. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred and four bloodstream isolates were tested for AN and GM susceptibility between 1989 and 1994. Activities of AN and GM remained high during the study period against most isolates of Gram-negative bacteria. No relationship could be observed between the use of AN/GM and the rate of AN/GM resistance. Nosocomial Gram-negative bloodstream isolates showed a higher degree of resistance towards both AN (3.9% of all nosocomial isolates) and GM (7.9%) than community-acquired isolates (1.8% toward AN and 3.1% towards GM, respectively). There was a significant increase (P=0.004) in the risk of GM resistance in patients with nosocomial Gram-negative bacteremia detected more than 14 days after admission. The proportion of GM-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates decreased linearly from 97% for infections acquired between day 3 and day 10 following admission to 80% for bacteremia developing 30 days or more after admission (P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: AN and GM remain highly active antimicrobial drugs for treatment of GNB in times of growing resistance to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones.

Amikacin as first-choice aminoglycoside in a medical intensive care unit: a one-year bacteriological surveillance study

The aim of this study was to determine the baseline pattern of resistance to aminoglycosides in a medical intensive care unit and to evaluate the influence on resistance rates of the use of amikacin as first-line aminoglycoside. A prospective bacteriological surveillance study was done during a 3-month baseline period with all aminoglycosides freely available, followed by a 9-month study period with predominant amikacin use. All patients admitted for more than 24 hours who were colonized or infected were included. Susceptibility rates for all isolates during the baseline period were 69% for amikacin, 32% for gentamicin, 35% for tobramycin and 46% for netilmicin. During the amikacin study period susceptibility rates rose to 75%, 43%, 44% and 51%, respectively. The increase in susceptibility to gentamicin and tobramycin, considering all isolates, was statistically significant. There was also a significant increase in susceptibility to netilmicin for gram-negative bacteria. There was no significant change in susceptibility to amikacin. We conclude that the use of amikacin as a first-choice aminoglycoside in a medical intensive care unit is warranted because of the better susceptibility rates and does not lead to a rapid rise in amikacin resistance. The predominant use of amikacin may have a favorable influence on susceptibility to the other aminoglycosides. To answer the question of whether these conclusions will remain valid over a longer period of predominant amikacin use, follow-up surveillance studies are mandatory.

Aminoglycosides

Despite their nephrotoxic and ototoxic side effects, AG remain useful antibiotics because of their major, rapid, and dose-dependent bactericidal effects. Combination therapy with an AG appears particularly important in neutropenic and other high-risk patients to provide broad-spectrum bactericidal activity, synergism, and reduction of emergence of resistant pathogens. OD AG therapy is associated with high peak levels in serum that maintain efficacy and low-to-undetectable trough levels in serum that attenuate the risk of toxicity. Administration of short-term OD AG therapy to patients not at risk without renal impairment may not absolutely require dosing monitoring. This therapeutic strategy has been proved useful in clinical trials, now including febrile episodes in neutropenic patients, but it should be avoided during infections in which antimicrobial synergism is required, such as enterococcal endocarditis.

Prospective evaluation of a two-week course of intravenous antibiotics in intravenous drug addicts with infective endocarditis. Grupo de Estudio de Enfermedades Infecciosas de la Provincia de Cádiz

In a prospective study, a two-week course of antibiotics (cloxacillin 2 g/4 h plus amikacin 7.5 mg/kg/12 h) was evaluated in the therapy of right-sided infective endocarditis in intravenous drug users (IVDU). All IVDU admitted to hospital during the study period who fulfilled the strict criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis were analysed. A subgroup of patients with right-sided endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus who had a good prognosis were selected as being eligible for the two-week course of treatment. In a total of 139 episodes of infective endocarditis in IVDU, 72 (51.8%) cases were eligible for the two-week treatment. Of this group, 67 were cured, 4 needed prolongation of treatment to cure the infection and 1 died in hospital of respiratory distress syndrome on day 10 of treatment. In patients not eligible for the two-week treatment, the mortality was higher (24.2% versus 0.7%; p = 0.00015). Drug toxicity in the treated group was low. It can be concluded that administration of cloxacillin and amikacin parenterally for 14 consecutive days was successful in the therapy of right-sided endocarditis in IVDU.

Increased resistance to amikacin in a neonatal unit following intensive amikacin usage

Gram-negative isolates from blood and cerebrospinal fluid were monitored for 1 year before and for 1 year after the first-line aminoglycoside in a busy pediatric department was changed from gentamicin to amikacin. In the general pediatric wards, the switch to amikacin resulted in no change in resistance of nosocomial gram-negative infections to either amikacin (0% before and after) or gentamicin (23.9% [before] versus 26.5% [after]). In the neonatal unit, the switch to amikacin was followed by an outbreak of Serratia spp. that were commonly resistant to amikacin but susceptible to gentamicin. This outbreak abated spontaneously. In the year after the change in aminoglycoside usage, the resistance to amikacin of nosocomially acquired gram-negative infections increased from 7.6 to 27.7% (P less than 0.001), and the resistance to gentamicin decreased from 71.2 to 60.2% (P = 0.07). The increase in amikacin resistance of gram-negative bacilli other than Serratia spp. has persisted for more than a year after the introduction of amikacin as the sole aminoglycoside. The different effects observed in the two sections of the pediatric department may be related to the more intensive usage of aminoglycosides in the neonatal unit.