1
|
Deboever N, Jones CM, Yamashita K, Ajani JA, Hofstetter WL. Advances in diagnosis and management of cancer of the esophagus. BMJ 2024; 385:e074962. [PMID: 38830686 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy worldwide, with over 470 000 new cases diagnosed each year. Two distinct histological subtypes predominate, and should be considered biologically separate disease entities.1 These subtypes are esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Outcomes remain poor regardless of subtype, with most patients presenting with late stage disease.2 Novel strategies to improve early detection of the respective precursor lesions, squamous dysplasia, and Barrett's esophagus offer the potential to improve outcomes. The introduction of a limited number of biologic agents, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors, is resulting in improvements in the systemic treatment of locally advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer. These developments, coupled with improvements in minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic treatment approaches, as well as adaptive and precision radiotherapy technologies, offer the potential to improve outcomes still further. This review summarizes the latest advances in the diagnosis and management of esophageal cancer, and the developments in understanding of the biology of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Deboever
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher M Jones
- Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kohei Yamashita
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Herrera Kok JH, Marano L, van den Berg JW, Shetty P, Vashist Y, Lorenzon L, Rau B, van Hillegersberg R, de Manzoni G, Spallanzani A, Seo WJ, Nagata H, Eveno C, Mönig S, van der Sluis K, Solaini L, Wijnhoven BP, Puccetti F, Chevallay M, Lee E, D'Ugo D. Current trends in the management of Gastro-oEsophageal cancers: Updates to the ESSO core curriculum (ESSO-ETC-UGI-WG initiative). EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108387. [PMID: 38796969 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Gastro-oEsophageal Cancers (GECs) are severe diseases whose management is rapidly evolving. The European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO) is committed to the generation and spread of knowledge, and promotes the multidisciplinary management of cancer patients through its core curriculum. The present work discusses the approach to GECs, including the management of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancers (OMEC), the diagnosis and management of peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer (GC), the management of Siewert Type II tumors, the importance of mesogastric excision, the role of robotic surgery, textbook outcomes, organ preserving options, the use of molecular markers and immune check-point inhibitors in the management of patients with GECs, as well as the improvement of current clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with GECs. The aim of the present review is to provide a concise overview of the state-of-the-art on the management of patients with GECs and, at the same time, to share the latest advancements in the field and to foster the debate between surgical oncologists treating GECs worldwide. We are sure that our work will, at the same time, give an update to the advanced surgical oncologists and help the training surgical oncologists to settle down the foundations for their future practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnn Henry Herrera Kok
- European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), Education and Training Committee (ETC), Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI), Working Group (WG), Belgium; ESSO-European Young Surgeons and Alumni Club (EYSAC), Research Academy (RA), Belgium; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Upper GI Unit, University Hospital of León, León, Spain.
| | - Luigi Marano
- European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), Education and Training Committee (ETC), Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI), Working Group (WG), Belgium; Department of Medicine, Academy of Applied Medical and Social Sciences (AMiSNS), Akademia Medycznych i Społecznych Nauk Stosowanych, Elbląg, Poland
| | - Jan Willem van den Berg
- European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), Education and Training Committee (ETC), Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI), Working Group (WG), Belgium; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Preethi Shetty
- European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), Education and Training Committee (ETC), Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI), Working Group (WG), Belgium; Department of Surgical Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, MAHE Manipal, India
| | - Yogesh Vashist
- European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), Education and Training Committee (ETC), Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI), Working Group (WG), Belgium; Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Laura Lorenzon
- ESSO-European Young Surgeons and Alumni Club (EYSAC), Research Academy (RA), Belgium; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Beate Rau
- Department of Surgery, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Charité Campus Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Giovanni de Manzoni
- Department of General Surgery, Upper GI Unit, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Spallanzani
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Won Jun Seo
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; PIPS-GC Study Group, Republic of Korea
| | - Hiromi Nagata
- Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Clarisse Eveno
- Department of Surgery, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Stefan Mönig
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Karen van der Sluis
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leewenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leonardo Solaini
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | - Bas Pl Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Francesco Puccetti
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mickael Chevallay
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Eunju Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea; Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Domenico D'Ugo
- European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), Education and Training Committee (ETC), Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI), Working Group (WG), Belgium; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; ESSO Past-President, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maatouk M, Nouira M, Dhaou AB, Kbir GH, Mabrouk A, Khlifa MB, Daldoul S, Sayari S, Moussa MB. Siewert II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: Still searching for the right treatment transabdominal or transthoracic surgical approaches? Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2024; 32:244-255. [PMID: 38545667 DOI: 10.1177/02184923241238486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To date, the discussion is still ongoing whether the Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) should be resected either by thoracoabdominal esophagectomy or gastrectomy with resection of the distal esophagus by transhiatal extension. The aim of our study was to compare the oncological and perioperative outcomes of the transthoracic approach (TTA) and the transabdominal approach (TAA). METHODS Searches of electronic databases identifying studies from Cochrane, PubMed and Google Scholar were performed. Randomised and non-randomised studies comparing TTA and TAA approaches for surgical treatment of AEG Siewert type II were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa and Jada scales were used to evaluate methodological quality. The risk of bias was assessed using the Rob v2 and Robins-I tools. Meta-analyses were conducted for the outcomes. RESULTS We included 17 trials (2 randomised controlled trials and 15 cohorts) involving 15297 patients. Longer three-year overall survival, five-year overall survival and R0 resection rates were observed in the TTA group. However, TTA had greater morbidity and pulmonary complications. CONCLUSION Transthoracic approach appears to be preferable for selected Siewert II tumours. This may lead to higher survival rates and better R0 resection rate. Well-designed studies are needed to confirm the results of this systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Maatouk
- A21 Surgery Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Mariem Nouira
- Service of Medical Epidemiology, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Faculty of medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Anis Ben Dhaou
- A21 Surgery Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Ghassen Hamdi Kbir
- A21 Surgery Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Aymen Mabrouk
- A21 Surgery Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| | | | - Sami Daldoul
- A21 Surgery Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Sofien Sayari
- A21 Surgery Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Mounir Ben Moussa
- A21 Surgery Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yu B, Liu Z, Zhang L, Pan J, Jiang C, Li C, Li Z. Pre- and intra-operative risk factors predict postoperative respiratory failure after minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 65:ezae107. [PMID: 38492559 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Severe pulmonary complications such as postoperative respiratory failure can occur after minimally invasive oesophagectomy. However, the risk factors have not been well identified. The goal of this study was to develop a predictive model for the occurrence of postoperative respiratory failure with a large sample. METHODS We collected data from patients with oesophageal cancer who had a minimally invasive oesophagectomy at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2019 to 2022. Univariable and backward stepwise logistic regression analysis of 19 pre- and intra-operative factors was used before model fitting, and its performance was evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic curve. Internal validation was assessed with a calibration plot, decision curve analysis and area under the curve with 95% confidence intervals, obtained from 1000 resamples set by the bootstrap method. RESULTS This study enrolled 2,386 patients, 57 (2.4%) of whom developed postoperative respiratory failure. Backward stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that age, body mass index, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, tumour location and duration of chest surgery ≥101.5 min were predictive factors. A predictive model was constructed and showed acceptable performance (area under the curve: 0.755). The internal validation with the bootstrap method proves the good agreement for prediction and reality. CONCLUSIONS Obesity, severe diffusion dysfunction and upper segment oesophageal cancer were strong predictive factors. The established predictive model has acceptable predictive validity for postoperative respiratory failure after minimally invasive oesophagectomy, which may improve the identification of high-risk patients and enable health-care professionals to perform risk assessment for postoperative respiratory failure at the initial consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boyao Yu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhichao Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Long Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Pan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chao Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chunguang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhigang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ketel MHM, Klarenbeek BR, Eddahchouri Y, Cheong E, Cuesta MA, van Daele E, Ferri LE, Gisbertz SS, Gutschow CA, Hubka M, Hölscher AH, Law S, Luyer MDP, Merritt RE, Morse CR, Mueller CL, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson M, Pattyn P, Shen Y, van den Wildenberg FJH, Abma IL, Rosman C, van Workum F. A Video-Based Procedure-Specific Competency Assessment Tool for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:297-305. [PMID: 38150247 PMCID: PMC10753443 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
Importance Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a complex procedure with substantial learning curves. In other complex minimally invasive procedures, suboptimal surgical performance has convincingly been associated with less favorable patient outcomes as assessed by peer review of the surgical procedure. Objective To develop and validate a procedure-specific competency assessment tool (CAT) for MIE. Design, Setting, and Participants In this international quality improvement study, a procedure-specific MIE-CAT was developed and validated. The MIE-CAT contains 8 procedural phases, and 4 quality components per phase are scored with a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4. For evaluation of the MIE-CAT, intraoperative MIE videos performed by a single surgical team in the Esophageal Center East Netherlands were peer reviewed by 18 independent international MIE experts (with more than 120 MIEs performed). Each video was assessed by 2 or 3 blinded experts to evaluate feasibility, content validity, reliability, and construct validity. MIE-CAT version 2 was composed with refined content aimed at improving interrater reliability. A total of 32 full-length MIE videos from patients who underwent MIE between 2011 and 2020 were analyzed. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to January 2023. Exposure Performance assessment of transthoracic MIE with an intrathoracic anastomosis. Main Outcomes and Measures Feasibility, content validity, interrater and intrarater reliability, and construct validity, including correlations with both experience of the surgical team and clinical parameters, of the developed MIE-CAT. Results Experts found the MIE-CAT easy to understand and easy to use to grade surgical performance. The MIE-CAT demonstrated good intrarater reliability (range of intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], 0.807 [95% CI, 0.656 to 0.892] for quality component score to 0.898 [95% CI, 0.846 to 0.932] for phase score). Interrater reliability was moderate (range of ICCs, 0.536 [95% CI, -0.220 to 0.994] for total MIE-CAT score to 0.705 [95% CI, 0.473 to 0.846] for quality component score), and most discrepancies originated in the lymphadenectomy phases. Hypothesis testing for construct validity showed more than 75% of hypotheses correct: MIE-CAT performance scores correlated with experience of the surgical team (r = 0.288 to 0.622), blood loss (r = -0.034 to -0.545), operative time (r = -0.309 to -0.611), intraoperative complications (r = -0.052 to -0.319), and severe postoperative complications (r = -0.207 to -0.395). MIE-CAT version 2 increased usability. Interrater reliability improved but remained moderate (range of ICCs, 0.666 to 0.743), and most discrepancies between raters remained in the lymphadenectomy phases. Conclusions and Relevance The MIE-CAT was developed and its feasibility, content validity, reliability, and construct validity were demonstrated. By providing insight into surgical performance of MIE, the MIE-CAT might be used for clinical, training, and research purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirte H. M. Ketel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Yassin Eddahchouri
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Edward Cheong
- The PanAsia Surgery Group, Mount Elizabeth Hospital, Singapore
| | - Miguel A. Cuesta
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elke van Daele
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo E. Ferri
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Suzanne S. Gisbertz
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian A. Gutschow
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michal Hubka
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Arnulf H. Hölscher
- Department for General, Visceral and Trauma Surgery, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus-Essen GmbH, Essen, Germany
| | - Simon Law
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Misha D. P. Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Robert E. Merritt
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
| | | | - Carmen L. Mueller
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Magnus Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Piet Pattyn
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Yaxing Shen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Inger L. Abma
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wirsik NM, Schmidt T, Nienhüser H, Donlon NE, de Jongh C, Uzun E, Fuchs HF, Brunner S, Alakus H, Hölscher AH, Grimminger P, Schneider M, Reynolds JV, van Hillegersberg R, Bruns CJ. Impact of the Surgical Approach for Neoadjuvantly Treated Gastroesophageal Junction Type II Tumors: A Multinational, High-volume Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Ann Surg 2023; 278:683-691. [PMID: 37522845 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore oncologic outcomes of transhiatal gastrectomy (THG) or transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) for neoadjuvantly treated gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) Siewert type II adenocarcinomas, a multinational, high-volume center cohort analysis was undertaken. BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) followed by surgery is the standard therapy for locally advanced GEJ. However, the optimal surgical approach for type II GEJ tumors remains unclear, as the decision is mainly based on individual experience and assessment of operative risk. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 5 prospectively maintained databases was conducted. Between 2012 and 2021, 800 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria for type II GEJ tumors and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or CTx. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS). Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias. RESULTS Patients undergoing THG (n=163, 20.4%) had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification and cT stage ( P <0.001) than patients undergoing TTE (n=637, 79.6%). Neoadjuvant therapy was different as the THG group were mainly undergoing CTx (87.1%, P <0.001). The TTE group showed higher tumor regression ( P =0.009), lower ypT/ypM categories (both P <0.001), higher nodal yield ( P =0.009) and higher R0 resection rate ( P =0.001). The mOS after TTE was longer (78.0 vs 40.0 months, P =0.013). After propensity score matching a higher R0 resection rate ( P =0.004) and mOS benefit after TTE remained ( P =0.04). Subgroup analyses of patients without distant metastasis ( P =0.037) and patients only after neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( P =0.021) confirmed the survival benefit of TTE. TTE was an independent predictor of longer survival. CONCLUSION Awaiting results of the randomized CARDIA trial, TTE should in high-volume centers be considered the preferred approach due to favorable oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naita M Wirsik
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Henrik Nienhüser
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Noel E Donlon
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity St James' Cancer Institute, St James's Hospital Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cas de Jongh
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eren Uzun
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Hans F Fuchs
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefanie Brunner
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hakan Alakus
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Arnulf H Hölscher
- Contilia Center for Esophageal Diseases, Elisabeth Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Grimminger
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Martin Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - John V Reynolds
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity St James' Cancer Institute, St James's Hospital Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Christiane J Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|