Efficacy and Safety of Approximately 3 Years of Continuous Ozanimod in Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Interim Analysis of the True North Open-label Extension

Safety Outcomes in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Using a Healthcare Administrative Database in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Several therapies, including sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators, have been approved for ulcerative colitis (UC). Safety findings should be complemented with real-world data (RWD) as rare events may be underestimated in clinical trials due to populations not fully reflecting real-world practice.

METHODS

We used RWD to investigate safety outcomes in 4 cohorts: (1) those receiving any UC treatment (UC overall), (2) those receiving advanced therapies (UC advanced therapy), (3) those meeting the selection criteria of the etrasimod ELEVATE UC clinical program (UC trial-similar), (4) individuals without UC (Non-UC). Data were extracted (1/2016-12/2022) from the Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record data set.

RESULTS

Data from 32 170 (UC overall), 3332 (UC advanced therapy), 1435 (UC trial-similar), and 160 795 (Non-UC) individuals were included. In the UC overall cohort, <11% of patients used advanced therapy. The UC overall cohort had significantly higher incidence rates (IRs) across most safety outcomes compared with the Non-UC cohort (highest: malignancy [excluding non-melanoma skin cancer] at 31.1 compared with 14.1 IRs per 1000 patient-years, respectively), regardless of age or oral corticosteroid use. Incidence rates of safety outcomes for the UC advanced therapy and UC trial-similar (also requiring prior advanced therapy use) cohorts were generally similar or lower than the UC overall cohort. The UC trial-similar and UC advanced therapy cohorts had generally comparable safety outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings assist in understanding the background risks of safety events in patients with UC and suggest that the incidence of select safety outcomes is comparable between the ELEVATE UC trials and RWD.

Concomitant Administration of Ozanimod and Serotonergic Antidepressants in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis or Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Ozanimod, approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), is a weak in vitro monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor. MAO-B inhibitors can cause serotonin accumulation with concomitant use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). We evaluated the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) potentially associated with serotonin accumulation during ozanimod and concomitant SSRI/SNRI use in this post hoc analysis of pooled UC studies and the open-label extension RMS DAYBREAK.

METHODS

Data for ozanimod 0.92 mg from pooled UC studies (n = 1158; cutoff: January 10, 2022) and RMS DAYBREAK (n = 2257; cutoff: February 1, 2022) were analyzed. Concomitant SSRI/SNRI use was allowed in the UC (n = 67) and RMS (n = 274) studies. A narrow Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities search ("serotonin syndrome," "neuroleptic malignant syndrome," and "malignant hyperthermia") and a broad search including terms potentially associated with serotonin accumulation were conducted. The percentages of patients with TEAEs in both searches were analyzed by concomitant SSRI/SNRI use when the TEAE occurred.

RESULTS

No patients had TEAEs matching the narrow search criteria. No differences were observed in the percentages of patients with ≥1 TEAE matching the broad search regardless of SSRI/SNRI use in UC (with: 25.4% [n = 17 of 67]; without: 15.0% [n = 164 of 1091]) and RMS (with: 12.4% [n = 34 of 274]; without: 15.6% [n = 310 of 1982]) studies.

CONCLUSIONS

No evidence of increased TEAEs potentially associated with serotonin accumulation was observed with concurrent use of ozanimod and SSRIs/SNRIs.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01647516, NCT02531126, NCT02435992, NCT02576717.

Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis Stratified by Baseline Modified Mayo Score: A Post Hoc Analysis From the Phase 3 ELEVATE UC Clinical Program

BACKGROUND

Etrasimod is an oral, once daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). This post hoc analysis of the ELEVATE UC clinical program describes etrasimod efficacy and safety by patients' baseline disease activity.

METHODS

Predefined efficacy endpoints were assessed at week 12 in patients with moderately (modified Mayo score [MMS] 5-7) or severely (MMS 8-9) active UC using pooled data from ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12. Descriptive statistics with 95% CI were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 743 patients analyzed, 525 (70.7%) had moderately active and 218 (29.3%) had severely active disease at baseline. At week 12, patients treated with etrasimod showed larger mean percentage reductions (95% CI) in MMS vs placebo, regardless of baseline disease activity (-48.4% [-52.3, -44.4] vs -27.0% [-32.2, -21.7] for moderately active disease and -46.4% [-51.2, -41.5] vs -29.8% [-37.2, -22.3] for severely active disease). Similar proportions of patients with moderately or severely active disease treated with etrasimod vs placebo achieved clinical response at week 12 (61.3% vs 39.8% for moderately active disease and 64.5% vs 30.3% for severely active disease). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between disease activity subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

At week 12, etrasimod showed greater reductions in disease activity and higher rates of clinical response vs placebo in patients with either moderately or severely active disease at baseline. The safety profile of etrasimod was consistent with the overall trial population and was unimpacted by baseline disease activity.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV

NCT03945188; NCT03996369.

Paradigm Shift in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management: Precision Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, and Emerging Therapies

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management stands at the cusp of a transformative era, with recent breakthroughs heralding a paradigm shift in treatment strategies. Traditionally, IBD therapeutics revolved around immunosuppressants, but the landscape has evolved significantly. Recent approvals of etrasimod, upadacitinib, mirikizumab, and risankizumab have introduced novel mechanisms of action, offering renewed hope for IBD patients. These medications represent a departure from the status quo, breaking years of therapeutic stagnation. Precision medicine, involving Artificial Intelligence, is a pivotal aspect of this evolution, tailoring treatments based on genetic profiles, disease characteristics, and individual responses. This approach optimizes treatment efficacy, and paves the way for personalized care. Yet, the rising cost of IBD therapies, notably biologics, poses challenges, impacting healthcare budgets and patient access. Ongoing research strives to assess cost-effectiveness, guiding policy decisions to ensure equitable access to advanced treatments. Looking ahead, the future of IBD management holds great promise. Emerging therapies, precision medicine, and ongoing research into novel targets promise to reshape the IBD treatment landscape. As these advances continue to unfold, IBD patients can anticipate a brighter future, one marked by more effective, personalized, and accessible treatments.

Progressing advanced therapies for inflammatory bowel disease: Current status including dual biologic therapy and discontinuation of biologics

INTRODUCTION

Advanced therapies (ADT) that encompass biological agents and small molecules have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), broadening the spectrum of available treatment options. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients fail to achieve satisfactory responses, necessitating surgical intervention. Treatment objectives have evolved beyond clinical remission, reduction of inflammation, and mucosal healing, shifting focus toward enhancing the quality of life, acknowledging the profound impact of IBD on physical and mental well-being.

AREA COVERED

This comprehensive review describes the current landscape of ADT for IBD, including dual biologic therapy (DBT), which involves the combination of two biologics or a single biologic with a small-molecule compound, as well as considerations surrounding the discontinuation of biologics.

EXPERT OPINION

ADT is the standard treatment for moderate to severe IBD, while DBT appears promising for specific subsets of patients, including those with refractory disease or extraintestinal manifestations. However, these approaches may increase the risk of adverse effects, including malignancy. To optimize individualized treatment strategies in patients with refractory IBD, further trials are needed to refine ADT's predictive value, establish DBT's safety and indications, define biologic discontinuation criteria, and evaluate emerging biomarkers, artificial intelligence, and bowel ultrasound in patient management.

Understanding the therapeutic toolkit for inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, is a group of chronic, immune-mediated disorders of the gastrointestinal tract that present substantial clinical challenges owing to their complex pathophysiology and tendency to relapse. A treat-to-target approach is recommended, involving iterative treatment adjustments to achieve clinical response, reduce inflammatory markers and achieve long-term goals such as mucosal healing. Lifelong medication is often necessary to manage the disease, maintain remission and prevent complications. The therapeutic landscape for IBD has evolved substantially; however, a ceiling on therapeutic efficacy remains and surgery is sometimes required (owing to uncontrolled disease activity or complications). Effective IBD management involves comprehensive care, including medication adherence and a collaborative clinician-patient relationship. This Review discusses current therapeutic options for IBD, detailing mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety profiles and guidelines for use of each drug class. We also explore emerging therapies and the role of surgery. Additionally, the importance of a multidisciplinary team and personalized care in managing IBD is emphasized, advocating for patient empowerment and involvement in treatment decisions. By synthesizing current knowledge and emerging trends, this Review aims to equip healthcare professionals with a thorough understanding of therapeutic options for IBD, enhancing informed, evidence-based decisions in clinical practice.

Drug Development in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: What Is Next?

Background/Objectives: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), which include Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic conditions requiring long-term therapy to maintain remission and improve quality of life. Despite the approval of numerous drugs, IBD continues to present treatment challenges. This review aims to summarize novel therapeutic target agents in phases II and III of development, including sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1P), anti-interleukin-23 (IL-23), and other small molecules and monoclonal antibodies currently under investigation (e.g., anti-TL1A, obefazimod, NX-13, RIPK-inhibitors). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to December 2024 to identify relevant articles published in English over the past three-five years, focusing on phase II/III studies for UC and CD. The search included databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and the ClinicalTrials.gov portal. Results: Clinical trials underline the potential of novel immunomodulators, including anti-TL1A, obefazimod, NX-13, RIPK inhibitors, and anti-IL-23p19 agents, as promising therapeutic options for IBD. Anti-IL23p19 therapies, such as risankizumab and mirikizumab, alongside guselkumab, exemplify this class's growing clinical relevance. While some are already in clinical use, others are nearing approval. Conclusions: Ongoing research into long-term safety and the development of personalized treatment strategies remains pivotal to enhance outcomes. Patient stratification and the strategic positioning of these therapies within the expanding treatment landscape are critical for optimizing their clinical impact.

Impact of Prior Biologic Exposure on Ozanimod Efficacy and Safety in the Phase 3 True North Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and prior biologic failure may have reduced or delayed efficacy with subsequent advanced therapies. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of ozanimod during the True North (TN) study and its open-label extension (OLE) in biologic-exposed patients with UC.

METHODS

TN was a randomized, placebo-controlled 52-week trial (10-week induction, 42-week maintenance period). Eligible patients could enter the OLE. Clinical outcomes were assessed at TN week (W) 10 and W52 and OLE W46 and W94. Symptomatic efficacy was evaluated through induction and in the OLE until W94. Safety was assessed.

RESULTS

This analysis included 376 biologic-exposed patients. In the placebo-controlled cohort, more ozanimod-treated patients achieved clinical response than placebo at W10 regardless of the number or type of prior biologics; patients who used 1 vs ≥2 prior biologics achieved higher efficacy rates. Efficacy rates were higher at W52 than W10 and were similar across subgroups regardless of the number or type of prior biologics. Significantly greater proportions of ozanimod vs placebo patients achieved symptomatic response by W5 ( P = 0.0173) and symptomatic remission by W10 ( P = 0.0207). Among biologic-exposed TN W10 ozanimod nonresponders who entered the OLE, 61% achieved symptomatic response with an extra 10 weeks of ozanimod treatment. Ozanimod efficacy was durable for ∼3 years of continuous treatment in biologic-exposed W52 clinical responders who entered the OLE. No new safety signals were observed.

DISCUSSION

Ozanimod was effective and safe in biologic-exposed patients with UC, but these patients may require more time to respond to treatment. Clinical trial registry website and trial numbers: ClinicalTrials.gov , numbers NCT02435992 and NCT02531126.

Identification of novel indolinone derivatives as CTSC inhibitors to treat inflammatory bowel disease by modulating inflammatory factors

Novel inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapeutic drugs, mainly biologics that neutralize pro-inflammatory factors and janus kinase inhibitors that inhibit cytokine-mediated signal transduction, face problems including low efficacy rates, limited therapeutic benefits, and infection risks. It is an important task to find proteins that broadly regulate a variety of cytokines and to develop corresponding drugs. Cathepsin C (CTSC) mediates neutrophil-related inflammatory, participates in the recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells, and regulates cytokines levels, and is considered an ideal target for IBD treatment. In this study, starting from the in-house molecule, through medicinal chemistry and target-based design, a novel CTSC inhibitor B22 with IBD therapeutic efficacy was discovered. In vitro target verification and mechanism study indicated that B22 inhibit CTSC activity by binding to S2 pocket and S1 site, further inhibiting downstream serine protease activity. In addition, B22 exhibited anti-inflammatory activity and regulated various cytokines levels. In vivo studies highlighted B22 bears acceptable toxicity and suitable pharmacokinetic properties, and displays anti-inflammatory activity in IBD model. In conclusion, B22 is a potential anti-inflammatory molecule for IBD by targeting CTSC and deserves further research.

Spanish Working Group in Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) position paper on cardiovascular disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death worldwide. Therefore, it is essential to understand their relationship and prevalence in different diseases that may present specific risk factors for them. The objective of this document is to analyze the specific prevalence of CVD in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), describing the presence of classical and non-classical cardiovascular risk factors in these patients. Additionally, we will detail the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis in this patient group and the different methods used to assess cardiovascular risk, including the use of risk calculators in clinical practice and different ways to assess subclinical atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction. Furthermore, we will describe the potential influence of medication used for managing patients with IBD on cardiovascular risk, as well as the potential influence of commonly used drugs for managing CVD on the course of IBD. The document provides comments and evidence-based recommendations based on available evidence and expert opinion. An interdisciplinary group of gastroenterologists specialized in IBD management, along with a consulting cardiologist for this type of patients, participated in the development of these recommendations by the Spanish Group of Work on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU).

Raising the bar in ulcerative colitis management

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by growing incidence and prevalence around the world in the last few decades. The range of available existing treatment and strategies for its management is being implemented. Given the introduction of newly developed molecules and the lack of specific guidelines, drug positioning may represent a tough clinical challenge. UC management is mostly medical, and it has been shifting toward a more personalized approach with the aim to create a tailored strategy depending on the patient's profile. A treat-to target strategy seems to be the best approach to reach disease control as it allows to carry out therapeutic choices based on objective and specific parameters: histological, ultrasonographic, and molecular targets may add to the already used clinical, endoscopic, and biochemical targets. In addition, dual-targeted therapy has emerged as an attractive therapeutic strategy for patients not achieving remission. This review aims to provide an overview of the available strategies to raise the bar in UC.

Non-serious adverse events in patients with ulcerative colitis receiving etrasimod: an analysis of the phase II OASIS and phase III ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 clinical trials

Background

Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). It is known that non-serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) may not lead to UC drug discontinuation but can affect treatment tolerability.

Objectives

This post hoc analysis evaluated the incidence of specific, common, non-serious TEAEs reported in the etrasimod UC clinical programme and the characteristics of affected patients.

Design

Data included patients from the Placebo-controlled UC cohort (phase II OASIS, and phase III ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 trials) receiving QD etrasimod (2 or 1 mg) or placebo.

Methods

Proportions and incidence rates (IRs; the number of patients with a TEAE divided by the total exposure in patient-years (PYs), per 100 PY) of Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness TEAEs were reported. Changes in heart rate among patients with Dizziness TEAEs were also evaluated.

Results

Among 943 patients (etrasimod 2 mg, N = 577 (276.7 PY); etrasimod 1 mg, N = 52 (11.4 PY); placebo, N = 314 (115.1 PY)), 48, 34, 27 and 21 patients experienced events of Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness, respectively. All events were non-serious; one patient treated with etrasimod was discontinued due to a Pyrexia TEAE. Numerically, IRs of Headache and Dizziness TEAEs were higher, and Nausea slightly higher, with etrasimod versus placebo (13.45 vs 8.63 per 100 PY, 6.52 vs 1.69 and 7.18 vs 5.13 per 100 PY, respectively); IRs were similar for Pyrexia. The duration of most TEAEs was 1-10 days.

Conclusion

In the etrasimod UC clinical programme, all Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness events were non-serious. Headache and Dizziness were more frequent, and Nausea slightly more frequent, among patients receiving etrasimod versus placebo. The post hoc nature of this analysis is a limitation. These results reiterate the favourable safety profile and tolerability of etrasimod.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02447302; NCT03945188; NCT03996369.

Review article: Novel therapies in inflammatory bowel disease - An update for clinicians

BACKGROUND

Several new treatments including small molecules and biologics have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases in recent years. Clinicians and patients now have a wide variety of therapeutic options to choose from and these novel therapies provide several advantages including oral administration, lower immunogenicity, better selectivity and arguably better safety profiles. An increase in treatment options has increased the complexity of decision-making. Both patients and clinicians have had to become rapidly familiar with efficacy of new medications balanced against a range of pre-initiation requirements, dosing schedules and adverse event profiles.

AIMS

To provide a simple guide to practising clinicians on recently approved and emerging therapies and address key challenges around treatment strategies such as optimal sequencing and timing of treatment.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched the published literature and major conference abstracts to identify phase III placebo-controlled and active comparator trials for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

RESULTS

Data for recently approved therapies including selective Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine-1 receptor modulators and p19 interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors have demonstrated improved patient outcomes in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Further comparative head-to-head studies have improved our understanding of when and how to optimally use newer therapies, specifically for IL-23 inhibitors. Data for emerging treatment options and novel treatment strategies such as early effective treatment, combinations of treatments and implications for sequencing are continuing to transform IBD care continually.

CONCLUSIONS

Recently approved novel therapies have expanded the range of medical options available to treat IBD. However, further data from long-term extension studies, real-world studies and head-to-head trials are warranted to better inform the long-term safety and optimal sequencing of treatments for patients living with IBD.

The discovery and development of the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator ozanimod in ulcerative colitis

Sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P) modulators have received recent FDA-approval for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis, including agents ozanimod, approved in 2021, and etrasimod, approved in 2023. These oral drugs are uniquely efficacious in UC as they have multimodal mechanisms contributing to their beneficial immunomodulatory effects, while preserving host response to pathogens and attenuating toxicities observed with less specific agents. In this review, the discovery and development of the first approved S1P modulator, ozanimod, is described in detail: from design of initial screens to discover unique binding agents, to extensive chemical modifications to improve pharmacokinetic and safety profiles, and through preclinical and clinical studies validating mechanism and establishing safety and efficacy. Ultimately, this review will not only inform the reader of the unique path to development of a clinical S1P modulator for UC, but will also highlight advances made and gaps remaining to individualize therapeutic approaches for inflammatory bowel disease.

Targeting the Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Pathway: New Opportunities in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic immune-mediated diseases which primarily target the intestines. In recent years, the development and regulatory approval of various immunotherapies, both biological agents and small molecules, that target specific pathways of the IBD-associated inflammatory cascade have revolutionized the treatment of IBD. Small molecules offer the advantages of oral administration and short wash-out times. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive metabolite of ceramide, which exerts its functions after binding to five G-protein-coupled receptors (S1PR1-S1PR5). Concerning IBD, S1P participates in the egress of lymphocytes from the secondary lymphoid tissue and their re-circulation to sites of inflammation, mainly through S1PR1 binding. In addition, this system facilitates the differentiation of T-helper cells towards proinflammatory immunophenotypes. Recently, S1P modulators have offered a valuable addition to the IBD treatment armamentarium. They exert their anti-inflammatory function via sequestration of T cell subsets in the lymphoid tissues and prevention of gut homing. In this review, we revisit the role of the S1P/S1PR axis in the pathogenesis of IBD and discuss efficacy and safety data from clinical trials and real-world reports on the two S1PR modulators, ozanimod and etrasimod, that are currently approved for IBD treatment, and comment on their potential positioning in the IBD day-to-day management. We also present recent data on emerging S1P modulators. Finally, based on the successes and failures of S1PR modulators in IBD, we discuss future avenues of IBD treatments targeting the S1P/S1PR axis.

Ulcerative colitis: clinical biomarkers, therapeutic targets, and emerging treatments

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is one of the two forms of inflammatory bowel disease. It affects 5 million people globally, and is a chronic and recurring inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract with clinical presentation of abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and weight loss. The cause and the etiology of UC remain poorly understood. There is no cure and no 'gold standard diagnostic' for UC. The existing treatments are ineffective, and UC patients have a lower life expectancy with a risk of colorectal cancer. Recent studies in pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and biomarkers have significantly improved our understanding of UC. In this review we summarize recent advances in identifying novel clinical biomarkers, diagnostics, treatment targets, and emerging therapeutics. These insights are expected to assist in developing effective treatments for UC.

Immunity in digestive diseases: new drugs for inflammatory bowel disease treatment-insights from Phase II and III trials

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), continues to challenge treatment paradigms. Advancements in therapeutic options have been have been driven by Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of new drug classes, particularly sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) modulators and interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitors.

METHODS

This review synthesizes findings from Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials conducted up to early 2024, focusing on the impact of S1P modulators and IL-23 inhibitors on IBD management. Drugs such as ozanimod, etrasimod, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab, and brasikumab were evaluated for their efficacy and safety profiles.

RESULTS

S1P modulators, such as ozanimod and etrasimod, effectively regulate immune cell trafficking to reduce inflammation and several trials highlight their clinical effectiveness in both inducing and maintaining remission in IBD, highlighting its long-term safety and sustained therapeutic effects. Additionally, IL-23 inhibitors including risankizumab, mirikizumab, and guselkumab, which disrupt key inflammatory cytokine pathways, have already shown significant effectiveness in inducing and maintaining remission in both CD and UC, with favorable safety profiles across multiple studies, suggesting their potential as critical components in managing IBD.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical trials indicate that both S1P modulators and IL-23 inhibitors offer promising therapeutic benefits and maintain strong safety profiles, positioning them as potential cornerstone treatments for IBD. Despite these advancements, further exploration into long-term safety and the development of personalized treatment strategies is essential for maximizing clinical outcomes.

How do sphingosine-1-phosphate affect immune cells to resolve inflammation?

Inflammation is an important immune response of the body. It is a physiological process of self-repair and defense against pathogens taken up by biological tissues when stimulated by damage factors such as trauma and infection. Inflammation is the main cause of high morbidity and mortality in most diseases and is the physiological basis of the disease. Targeted therapeutic strategies can achieve efficient toxicity clearance at the inflammatory site, reduce complications, and reduce mortality. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a lipid signaling molecule, is involved in immune cell transport by binding to S1P receptors (S1PRs). It plays a key role in innate and adaptive immune responses and is closely related to inflammation. In homeostasis, lymphocytes follow an S1P concentration gradient from the tissues into circulation. One widely accepted mechanism is that during the inflammatory immune response, the S1P gradient is altered, and lymphocytes are blocked from entering the circulation and are, therefore, unable to reach the inflammatory site. However, the full mechanism of its involvement in inflammation is not fully understood. This review focuses on bacterial and viral infections, autoimmune diseases, and immunological aspects of the Sphks/S1P/S1PRs signaling pathway, highlighting their role in promoting intradial-adaptive immune interactions. How S1P signaling is regulated in inflammation and how S1P shapes immune responses through immune cells are explained in detail. We teased apart the immune cell composition of S1P signaling and the critical role of S1P pathway modulators in the host inflammatory immune system. By understanding the role of S1P in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases, we linked the genomic studies of S1P-targeted drugs in inflammatory diseases to provide a basis for targeted drug development.

Emerging strategy towards mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: what the future holds?

For decades, the therapeutic goal of conventional treatment among inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is alleviating exacerbations in acute phase, maintaining remission, reducing recurrence, preventing complications, and increasing quality of life. However, the persistent mucosal/submucosal inflammation tends to cause irreversible changes in the intestinal structure, which can barely be redressed by conventional treatment. In the late 1990s, monoclonal biologics, mainly anti-TNF (tumor necrosis factor) drugs, were proven significantly helpful in inhibiting mucosal inflammation and improving prognosis in clinical trials. Meanwhile, mucosal healing (MH), as a key endoscopic and histological measurement closely associated with the severity of symptoms, has been proposed as primary outcome measures. With deeper comprehension of the mucosal microenvironment, stem cell niche, and underlying mucosal repair mechanisms, diverse potential strategies apart from monoclonal antibodies have been arising or undergoing clinical trials. Herein, we elucidate key steps or targets during the course of MH and review some promising treatment strategies capable of promoting MH in IBD.