The Safety Profile of Vedolizumab in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: 4 Years of Global Post-marketing Data

Real-world effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in TNF-exposed pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES

Vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) are second-line treatments in pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. Pediatric studies comparing the effectiveness of these medications are lacking. Using a registry from ImproveCareNow (ICN), a global research network in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease, we compared the effectiveness of UST and VDZ in anti-TNF refractory UC.

METHODS

We performed a propensity-score weighted regression analysis to compare corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR) at 6 months from starting second-line therapy. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of our findings to different ways of handling missing outcome data. Secondary analyses evaluated alternative proxies of response and infection risk.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 262 patients on VDZ and 74 patients on UST. At baseline, the two groups differed on their mean pediatric UC activity index (PUCAI) (p = 0.03) but were otherwise similar. At Month 6, 28.3% of patients on VDZ and 25.8% of those on UST achieved CFCR (p = 0.76). Our primary model showed no difference in CFCR (odds ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-1.59) (p = 0.54). The time to biologic discontinuation was similar in both groups (hazard ratio: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.76-2.08) (p = 0.36), with the reference group being VDZ, and we found no differences in clinical response, growth parameters, hospitalizations, surgeries, infections, or malignancy risk. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings of similar effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

UST and VDZ are similarly effective for inducing clinical remission in anti-TNF refractory UC in pediatric patients. Providers should consider safety, tolerability, cost, and comorbidities when deciding between these therapies.

Acute interstitial nephritis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with vedolizumab: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a complication of drugs that may cause permanent kidney injury. AIN has been reported in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with the integrin inhibitor vedolizumab. Through systematic review of existing literature, we aimed to identify and describe cases of AIN in patients with IBD treated with vedolizumab.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science Core Collection between 1 January 2009 and 25 April 2023. The search yielded 1473 publications. Titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers. Seventy publications were reviewed in full-text. Eight met the inclusion criteria. Clinical characteristics of AIN cases were extracted. Case causality assessment was performed according to two international adverse drug reaction probability assessment scales. Results were reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Nine biopsy-confirmed cases of AIN were reported in six patients with ulcerative colitis and three with Crohn's disease. Mean age at AIN onset was 36 years (range = 19-58) and the majority of patients were females (n = 6/9). Time from vedolizumab treatment initiation to AIN onset spanned from hours to 12 months. Common symptoms were fever and malaise. Creatinine levels were elevated in all patients. Five patients sustained permanent kidney injury.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that vedolizumab, although rarely, could cause AIN in patients with IBD. Awareness of laboratory findings and symptoms consistent with AIN, along with monitoring of the kidney function, could be warranted in patients with IBD treated with vedolizumab.

Understanding the molecular mechanisms of anti-trafficking therapies and their clinical relevance in inflammatory bowel disease

In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a combination of dysbiosis, increased intestinal permeability, and insufficient regulatory responses facilitate the development of chronic inflammation, which is driven by a complex interplay between the mucosal immune system and the environment and sustained by immune priming and ongoing cellular recruitment to the gut. The localization of immune cells is mediated by their expression of chemokine receptors and integrins, which bind to chemokines and adhesion molecules, respectively. In this article, we review the mechanisms of action of anti-trafficking therapies for IBD and consider clinical observations in the context of the different mechanisms of action. Furthermore, we discuss the evolution of molecular resistance to anti-cytokines, in which the composition of immune cells in the gut changes in response to treatment, and the potential implications of this for treatment sequencing. Lastly, we discuss the relevance of mechanism of action to combination therapy for IBD.

Use of IBD Drugs in Patients With Hepatobiliary Comorbidities: Tips and Tricks

Advanced therapies (biologic agents and small molecules) for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have radically changed the management of these diseases during the last decade. Data about these drugs in patients with hepatic disorders derive mainly from real-life studies, as these conditions often represent an exclusion criterion from pivotal drug developmental trials. However, IBD patients sometimes have concomitant liver diseases. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is the most prevalent hepatic comorbidity, whereas viral hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cholangitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and hepatic vascular disorders are less frequent. This review aimed at describing the real-life data about the use of advanced therapies for IBD in patients with concomitant hepatobiliary disorders. Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections do not represent an absolute contraindication for novel IBD therapeutic agents. Data from the literature suggest a safe hepatobiliary profile of biologic agents and small molecules in the case of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and portal vein thrombosis. Consequently, although the liver disease does not affect a different therapeutic approach in patients with concomitant IBD and liver disease, a close risk/benefit analysis for each drug should be performed in these patients, especially in cirrhotic patients and in the postliver transplant setting.

The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Special Populations-IBD in Seniors

Approximately one out of every 88 seniors has inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and this is expected to increase in the future. They are more likely to have left-sided disease in ulcerative colitis, and isolated colonic disease in Crohn's disease; perianal disease is less common. Other common diagnoses in the elderly must also be considered when they initially present to a healthcare provider. Treatment of the elderly is similar to younger persons with IBD, though considerations of the increased risk of infections and malignancy must be considered when using immune modulating drugs. Whether anti-TNF therapies increase the risk of infections is not definitive, though newer biologics, including vedolizumab and ustekinumab, are thought to be safer with lower risk of adverse events. Polypharmacy and frailty are other considerations in the elderly when choosing a treatment, as frailty is associated with worse outcomes. Costs for IBD-related hospitalizations are higher in the elderly compared with younger persons. When elderly persons with IBD are cared for by a gastroenterologist, their outcomes tend to be better. However, as elderly persons with IBD continue to age, they may not have access to the same care as younger people with IBD due to deficiencies in their ability to use or access technology.

Paternal Medications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Male Fertility and Reproductive Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Studies evaluating reproductive outcomes among male patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited. We evaluated use of IBD medications and association with semen parameters, a proxy of male fertility, and adverse pregnancy outcomes (early pregnancy loss [EPL], preterm birth [PB], congenital malformations [CM]).

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science (PROSPERO CRD42020197098) from inception to April 2022 for studies reporting semen parameters and adverse pregnancy outcomes among male patients exposed to biologics, thiopurine, or methotrexate. Standardized mean difference, prevalence, and odds ratios (ORs) of outcomes were pooled and analyzed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Ten studies reporting semen parameters (268 patients with IBD) and 16 studies reporting adverse pregnancy outcomes (over 25,000 patients with IBD) were included. Biologic, thiopurine, or methotrexate use were not associated with decreased sperm count, motility, or abnormal morphology compared with nonexposed patients. The prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes with paternal biologic (5%), thiopurine (6%), or methotrexate (6%) exposure was comparable to nonexposed patients (5%). Biologic use was not associated with risk of EPL (OR, 1.26; I2 = 0%; P = .12), PB (OR, 1.10; I2 = 0%; P = .17), or CM (OR, 1.03; I2 = 0%; P = .69). Thiopurine use was not associated with risk of EPL (OR, 1.31; I2 = 19%; P = .17), PB (OR, 1.05; I2 = 0%; P = .20), or CM (OR, 1.07; I2 = 7%; P = .34). Methotrexate use was not associated with risk of PB (OR, 1.06; I2 = 0%; P = .62) or CM (OR, 1.03; I2 = 0%; P = .81).

CONCLUSIONS

Biologic, thiopurine, or methotrexate use among male patients with IBD are not associated with impairments in fertility or with increased odds of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Extraintestinal Cancers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of chronic multifactorial inflammatory disorders including two major entities: Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Preliminary evidence suggests that patients with IBD may be at increased risk of developing intestinal and extraintestinal cancers (EICs). Actually, little is known about the association between IBD and EICs, and there is ever-growing concern regarding the safety of immunomodulators and biological therapy, which may represent a risk factor for carcinogenesis.

AIMS

The aim of this review is to summarize the evidence regarding the association between IBD and EICs, the safety of immunomodulators and biological therapy and the management of immunomodulators and biologic agents in IBD patients with prior or current EICs.

RESULTS

IBD patients have a higher risk of developing different forms of extraintestinal solid organ tumors and hematological malignancies. Immunomodulators and biological therapy may increase the risk of developing some types of EICs and may be consciously used in patients with IBD and current or prior history of malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Decisions regarding the use of immunomodulators or biological therapies should be made on an individual basis, considering a multidisciplinary approach involving oncologists.

An update on the safety of long-term vedolizumab use in inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Vedolizumab (Entyvio) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that disrupts the interaction between α4β7 integrin on circulating T-lymphocytes and MAdCAM-1 on the vascular endothelium to prevent their egress to sites of gut inflammation. It has proven therapeutic efficacy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and pouchitis.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review assesses the safety profile of vedolizumab from the registration trial programs, open-label extension studies, observational real-world data, and pooled safety analyses. This includes an evaluation of the long-term overall safety in special populations typically underrepresented in clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Vedolizumab is an effective therapy for inflammatory bowel disease with a well-established safety profile. No unexpected long-term safety signals have been identified. Safety data in pregnancy, in pediatric and elderly populations, in patients undergoing surgery, and in patients with a prior history of cancer are reassuring. Due to its safety merits, we propose that vedolizumab is an excellent candidate for advanced combination treatment with an anti-cytokine approach using another biologic or novel small molecule inhibitor. This is important in patients with medically refractory IBD, in patients at high risk of developing disease-related complications, or in patients with concomitant uncontrolled immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Ustekinumab for treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis in an elderly patient: A case report

BACKGROUND

Refractory ulcerative colitis is clinically irresponsive or intolerant to multiple drugs, with recurrent episodes and difficulties in treatment.

CASE SUMMARY

The patient in this case was diagnosed with ulcerative colitis due to repeated bloody stools for 4 mo after hemorrhoid surgery. After multiple drug treatment failures, the off-label treatment with ustekinumab was effective, and the patient's condition was under control.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis and treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis should not be limited to the indications of existing drugs. Integrating domestic and foreign medical experiences and guidelines can broaden the diagnosis and treatment approach and bring benefits to such patients.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatment in Cancer Patients-A Comprehensive Review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease for which medical treatment with immunomodulating drugs is increasingly used earlier to prevent disability. Additionally, cancer occurrence in IBD patients is increased for several reasons, either IBD-related or therapy-associated. Doctors are therefore facing the challenge of managing patients with IBD and a past or current malignancy and the need to balance the risk of cancer recurrence associated with immunosuppressive drugs with the potential worsening of IBD activity if they are withdrawn. This review aims to explore the features of different subtypes of cancer occurring in IBD patients to present current evidence on malignancy recurrence risk associated with IBD medical therapy along with the effects of cancer treatment in IBD and finally to discuss current recommendations on the management of these patients. Due to sparse data, a case-by-case multidisciplinary discussion is advised, including inputs from the gastroenterologist, oncologist, and patient.

Safety and Effectiveness of Vedolizumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: An Interim Analysis of a Japanese Post-Marketing Surveillance Study

INTRODUCTION

This ongoing post-marketing surveillance monitors the long-term safety and effectiveness of vedolizumab in routine clinical practice in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) in Japan. This interim analysis assessed induction-phase data, covering the initial three doses of vedolizumab.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled via a web-based electronic data capture system from approximately 250 institutions. Incidence of adverse events and treatment responses were assessed by the physicians after the patient had received three doses of vedolizumab or when the drug was discontinued, whichever occurred first. Therapeutic response was defined as any treatment response, including remission or improvement of complete or partial Mayo score, and was assessed in the total and stratified patient populations according to prior tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitor treatments and/or baseline partial Mayo score.

RESULTS

The total incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 4.10% (11/268). Common ADRs were dizziness, nausea, and arthralgia, each reported in 0.75% of patients (2/268). Serious ADRs were herpes zoster oticus and UC, each reported in 0.37% of patients (1/268). Therapeutic response was reported in 84.5% (218/258) of all patients, 85.8% (127/148) of TNFα inhibitor-naïve patients, and 82.7% (91/110) of TNFα inhibitor-experienced patients. Among patients with partial Mayo score of ≥ 4 at baseline, partial Mayo score remission in patients without or with prior TNFα inhibitor treatment was 62.5% (60/96) and 45.6% (36/79), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results confirm a safety and effectiveness profile of vedolizumab consistent with that observed in previous trials.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

JapicCTI-194603, NCT03824561.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in inflammatory bowel diseases: to the heart of the issue

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and stroke are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Along to the traditional risk factors for these diseases, chronic inflammation is known to be an important player in accelerating the process of atherosclerosis, which can result in an increased incidence of arterial thromboembolic events. As in other chronic inflammatory diseases, in the past few years, several studies suggested that subjects affected by inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) may also be at an incremented risk of atherosclerotic disease, especially during the periods of disease's flare. Therefore, IBD treatment may assume an important role for achieving both disease remission and the control of the atherosclerotic risk. In this article we aimed to perform a comprehensive review on evidence on the increased risk of arterial thromboembolic events in patients affected by IBD and discuss the potential role of IBD therapy in reducing this risk.

Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab for ulcerative colitis: a single-center retrospective real-world study in China

Introduction: The effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) against ulcerative colitis (UC) have been validated in several randomized controlled trials and real-world studies in Western countries. However, there are few studies on VDZ in Asia, and the follow-up period for these studies is generally short. Therefore, this study evaluates the long-term effectiveness and safety of VDZ in Chinese patients with UC. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with moderate to severe UC treated with VDZ between September 2019 and April 2022 at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine Zhejiang University. Clinical response and remission were assessed using the patient reported outcomes and the partial Mayo Score, and mucosal remission and healing were assessed using the Mayo Endoscopy Score. The primary endpoint was defined as clinical remission at week 14, and secondary endpoints included clinical response and steroid-free clinical remission at week 14, clinical response, clinical remission, and steroid-free clinical remission at week 52, and mucosal remission and healing at weeks 14 ± 8 and 52 ± 8. Results: Overall, 64 patients with moderate to severe UC were enrolled. The clinical response, clinical remission, and steroid-free clinical remission rates at week 14 were 73.4% (47/64), 65.6% (42/64), and 54.7% (35/64), respectively. Mucosal remission and healing rates at week 14 ± 8 were 64.7% (22/34) and 38.2% (13/34), respectively. A total of 48 patients were treated with VDZ for 52 weeks. Based on intention-to-treat analysis, the clinical response, clinical remission, and steroid-free clinical remission rates at week 52 were 68.8% (44/64), 64.1% (41/64), and 64.1% (41/64), respectively. Mucosal remission and healing rates at week 52 ± 8 were 70.6% (12/17) and 35.3% (6/17), respectively. During the follow-up period, the most common adverse event was skin rash (6/64). No cases of acute infusion reactions, delayed allergic reactions, new hepatitis B infections, active tuberculosis, or malignant tumors were reported. Conclusion: In this single-center retrospective real-world study, the effectiveness of long-term use of VDZ for Chinese patients with UC was similar to the outcomes previously reported in other geographical regions and populations; no new safety signals were found compared with other registered studies.

Inflammation-Driven Colorectal Cancer Associated with Colitis: From Pathogenesis to Changing Therapy

Patients affected by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a two-fold higher risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) than the general population. IBD-related CRC follows a different genetic and molecular pathogenic pathway than sporadic CRC and can be considered a complication of chronic intestinal inflammation. Since inflammation is recognised as an independent risk factor for neoplastic progression, clinicians strive to modulate and control disease, often using potent therapy agents to achieve mucosal healing and decrease the risk of colorectal cancer in IBD patients. Improved therapeutic control of inflammation, combined with endoscopic advances and early detection of pre-cancerous lesions through surveillance programs, explains the lower incidence rate of IBD-related CRC. In addition, current research is increasingly focused on translating emerging and advanced knowledge in microbiome and metagenomics into personalised, early, and non-invasive CRC screening tools that guide organ-sparing therapy in IBD patients. This review aims to summarise the existing literature on IBD-associated CRC, focusing on new insights into the alteration of the intestinal barrier and the interactions with the gut microbiome as the initial promoter. In addition, the role of OMIC techniques for precision medicine and the impact of the available IBD therapeutic armamentarium on the evolution to CRC will be discussed.

The Optimal Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Patients with Cancer

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of cancer secondary to chronic inflammation and long-term use of immunosuppressive therapy. With the aging IBD population, the prevalence of cancer in IBD patients is increasing. As a result, there is increasing concern about the impact of IBD therapy on cancer risk and survival, as well as the effects of cancer therapies on the disease course of IBD. Managing IBD in patients with current or previous cancer is challenging since clinical guidelines are based mainly on expert consensus. Evidence is rare and mainly available from registries or observational studies. In contrast, excluding patients with previous/or active cancer from clinical trials and short-term follow-up can lead to an underestimation of the cancer or cancer recurrence risk of approved medications. The present narrative review aims to summarize the current evidence and provide practical guidance on the management of IBD patients with cancer.

Risk of Infection in Elderly Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease under biologics: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational, One-Year follow-up comparative study

OBJECTIVES

The emergence of biologics has improved the course of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in the elderly population despite a potential higher risk of infections. We conducted a one-year, prospective, multicenter, observational study to determine the frequency of occurrence of at least one infectious event in elderly IBD patients under anti-TNF therapy compared with that in elderly patients under vedolizumab or ustekinumab therapies .

METHODS

All IBD patients over 65 years exposed to anti-TNF, vedolizumab or ustekinumab therapies were included. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of at least one infection during the whole one year follow-up.

RESULTS

Among the 207 consecutive elderly IBD patients prospectively enrolled, 113 were treated with anti-TNF and 94 with vedolizumab (n=63) or ustekinumab (n=31) (median age 71 years, 112 Crohn's disease). The Charlson index was similar between patients under anti-TNF and those under vedolizumab or ustekinumab as well as the proportion of patients under combination therapy and under concomitant steroid therapy did not differ between both both groups. The prevalence of infections was similar in patients under anti-TNF and in those under vedolizumab or ustekinumab (29% versus 28%, respectively; p=0.81). There was no difference in terms of type and severity of infection and of infection-related hospitalization rate. In multivariate regression analysis, only the Charlson comorbidity index (≥ 1) was identified as a significant and independent risk factor of infection (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Around 30 % of elderly patients with IBD under biologics experienced at least one infection during the one-year study follow-up period. The risk of occurrence of infection does not differ between anti-TNF and vedolizumab or ustekinumab therapies, and only the associated comorbidity was linked with the risk of infection.

The oft-overlooked cardiovascular complications of inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be associated with several extraintestinal comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease (CVD). Chronic inflammation is recognized as an important factor in atherogenesis, thrombosis, and myocarditis.

AREAS COVERED

IBD patients may be at increased risk for developing early atherosclerosis, cardiovascular events, peripheral artery disease, venous thromboembolism, myocarditis, and arrhythmias. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and thiopurines have been shown to have a protective effect against acute arterial events, but more research is needed. However, an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and major cardiovascular events has been described with the use of Janus kinase inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

CVD risk is slightly increased in patients with IBD, especially during flares. Thromboprophylaxis is strongly recommended in hospitalized patients with active disease as the benefit of anticoagulation outweighs the risk of bleeding. The pathogenetic relationship between CVD and IBD and the impact of IBD drugs on CVD outcomes are not fully elucidated. CVD risk doesn't have the strength to drive a specific IBD treatment. However, proper CVD risk profiling should always be done and the best strategy to manage CVD risk in IBD patients is to combine appropriate thromboprophylaxis with early and durable remission of the underlying IBD.

Safety of sequential biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: results from a tertiary referral centre

BACKGROUND

Biologicals represent the cornerstone of treatment for moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Many patients cycle between biologicals when encountering loss of response or adverse events.

AIM

To assess the occurrence of serious infections and malignancies with exposure to several (classes of) biologicals.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary referral centre including consecutive IBD patients exposed to adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab or vedolizumab between 1996 and 2019. All serious infections and malignancies, as well as potential confounders, were accounted for.

RESULTS

In total, 1575 patients were included with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 10 (6-16) years and a duration of biological therapy of 71 (39-112) months. Incidence rates of serious infections were 3.4 per 100 patients' years (PY) in the post-biological setting. Serious infections after biological exposure were associated with systemic steroids in monotherapy (hazard ratio 2.96 [95% confidence interval 1.78-4.93], p < 0.0001), combination therapy of systemic steroids and a biological (2.44 [1.37-4.34], p = 0.002), female gender (1.25 [1.04-1.51], p = 0.02), and prior serious infections in the pre-biological setting (1.42 [1.03-1.96], p = 0.03). Malignancy rates were 1.06 per 100PY in the post-biological setting and increased with older age at biological initiation (1.04 [1.02-1.05], p < 0.0001). The risk for serious infections or malignancies was independent of type and number of biologicals to which the patient was exposed.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the sequential use of biological therapy in IBD does not seem to convey an overall higher risk of serious infections or malignancies, but that underlying more refractory disease seems to increase this risk.

Therapeutic strategies in Crohn’s disease in an emergency surgical setting

Crohn’s disease (CD) remains a chronic, incurable disorder that presents unique challenges to the surgeon. Multiple factors must be considered to allow development of an appropriate treatment plan. Medical therapy often precedes or complements the surgical management. The indications for operative management of CD include acute and chronic disease complications and failed medical therapy. Elective surgery comes into play when patients are refractory to medical treatment if they have an obstructive phenotype. Toxic colitis, acute obstruction, perforation, acute abscess, or massive hemorrhage represent indications for emergency surgery. These patients are generally in critical conditions and present with intra-abdominal sepsis and a preoperative status of immunosuppression and malnutrition that exposes them to a higher risk of complications and mortality. A multidisciplinary team including surgeons, gastroenterologists, radiologists, nutritional support services, and enterostomal therapists are required for optimal patient care and decision making. Management of each emergency should be individualized based on patient age, disease type and duration, and patient goals of care. Moreover, the recurrent nature of disease mandates that we continue searching for innovative medical therapies and operative techniques that reduce the need to repeat surgical operations. In this review, we aimed to discuss the acute complications of CD and their treatment.

The effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab induction for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis for Asia patient: A real practice observational study

BACKGROUND

The use of biologic agents has become the cornerstone of therapy for moderate to severe IBD. Few studies have investigated the efficacy of vedolizumab (VDZ) induction for ulcerative colitis (UC) in Asian patients in a real practice setting.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of VDZ induction therapy for moderate to severe UC in Taiwan.

METHODS

This was a retrospective and observational study. Selected moderate to severe UC patients received VZD 300 mg i.v. at weeks 0, 2, and 6 as induction therapy. Mayo scores were calculated to evaluate the efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients with UC who received VDZ and completed the induction therapy at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (2017/10-2021/5) were included. The mean age was 46.5 year-old and the male to female ratio was 1:1 (19/18). 81.8% of the patients were biologic-naive. At weeks 8-10, a clinical response, clinical remission and endoscopic remission with VDZ induction therapy were achieved in 56.8% (21/37), 32.4% (12/37) and 58.3% (7/12) of the patients, respectively. 54.1% (20/37) were able to taper off at week 8. Overall, only 10.8% (4/37) of the patients were primary non-responders during induction therapy. No obvious VDZ-related severe adverse events were noted. Overall, 58.9% (11/19) of the patients relapsed after stopping VDZ, and the relapse rate after VDZ discontinuation was 42.1% (8/19) within first 6 months and 52.6% (10/19) within the first year.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world experience, induction therapy with VDZ showed promising clinical benefits and safety profile for patients with UC.

Vedolizumab-Induced Liver Injury

Drug-induced liver injury is an important cause of acute liver injury. Immunomodulatory therapies, such as vedolizumab (VDZ), are being increasingly used for the treatment of several diseases, most importantly inflammatory bowel disease. Several studies have demonstrated the safety of this substance. To date, only one post-marketing study has reported a case of hepatotoxicity attributable to VDZ. The authors present the case of a 41-year-old woman followed at the gastroenterology outpatient clinic for ulcerative colitis (UC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). This patient was being treated with low-dose glucocorticoids for AIH (prednisolone 10 mg), with adequate disease control. Additionally, she was being treated with oral salicylates (mesalamine 3 g/day) and oral budesonide (9 mg/day) for her UC. For uncontrolled UC, she was started on VDZ. Two weeks after the first infusion of VDZ, the patient developed a clinical and analytical phenotype compatible with acute hepatitis. Diagnostic workup for causes of hepatocellular liver injury retrieved no results. A liver biopsy corroborated the diagnosis of toxic hepatitis overlapping chronic liver disease. VDZ was withdrawn and the patient experienced complete recovery of liver tests over the following weeks. In this case report, we present the first post-marketing case of hepatocellular liver injury in probable relation to VDZ.

Infectious risk of vedolizumab compared with other biological agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Vedolizumab is a gut-selective anti-integrin (α4β7) antibody for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with a well-known optimal safety profile. We aimed to compare its risk of infections with that of anti-TNF drugs and ustekinumab in patients with both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.

METHODS

All Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients undergoing biological treatment at our centre between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively included. All infectious complications were registered, considering both inpatient and outpatient events. A comparison of the exposure-adjusted infection rates of vedolizumab, anti-TNF drugs and ustekinumab was carried out, with a specific focus on the rate of gut infections. All infection rates were expressed in events per patient-years (PYs).

RESULTS

The overall exposure-adjusted infection rate was 11.5/100 PYs. The most common infections were respiratory tract infections, cutaneous infections, HSV infections/reactivations and gut infections. The rate of serious infections was 1.3/100 PYs. The infection rate of vedolizumab was 17.5/100 PYs, with Crohn's disease patients having a lower infection risk compared with ulcerative colitis patients (P = 0.035). Gut infections were observed in 3.0% of the whole patient population (1.5/100 PYs) and were more common in the vedolizumab group (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms the good safety profile of vedolizumab. Among patients treated with vedolizumab, those with ulcerative colitis have a higher risk of developing infectious complications. Patients treated with vedolizumab have a higher risk of gut infections compared with patients treated with anti-TNF drugs or ustekinumab. Presumably, this is due to the gut-selective mechanism of action of vedolizumab.

International consensus on the prevention of venous and arterial thrombotic events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of thrombotic events. Therapies for IBD have the potential to modulate this risk. The aims of this Evidence-Based Guideline were to summarize available evidence and to provide practical recommendations regarding epidemiological aspects, prevention and drug-related risks of venous and arterial thrombotic events in patients with IBD. A virtual meeting took place in May 2020 involving 14 international IBD experts and 3 thrombosis experts from 12 countries. Proposed statements were voted upon in an anonymous manner. Agreement was defined as at least 75% of participants voting as 'fully agree' or 'mostly agree' with each statement. For each statement, the level of evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system. Consensus was reached for 19 statements. Patients with IBD harbour an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombotic events. Thromboprophylaxis is indicated during hospitalization of any cause in patients with IBD. Disease activity is a modifiable risk factor in patients with IBD, and physicians should aim to achieve deep remission to reduce the risk. Exposure to steroids should be limited. Antitumour necrosis factor agents might be associated with a reduced risk of thrombotic events.

Efficacy and Safety of Vedolizumab in Management of Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease and causes inflammation and ulcer of the colon. Vedolizumab is a newer biological agent with an inhibitory effect on α4β7 integrin approved for moderate to severe UC patients. Our study reviewed the clinical response, clinical remission, and mucosal healing of vedolizumab in moderate to severe UC management. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a literature search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct, and nine studies were included in the systematic review. At week six, vedolizumab showed a significant clinical response. At week 52, vedolizumab showed significant mucosal healing and clinical remission. The most commonly associated adverse effects are nasopharyngitis, oropharyngeal infection, and gastrointestinal infection. However, additional clinical trials and observational studies with longer follow-ups are required to study the efficacy and safety of the drug.

Association of Infliximab and Vedolizumab Trough Levels with Reported Rates of Adverse Events: A Cross-Sectional Study

Infliximab and vedolizumab are effective treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), although associated with adverse events (AE). While low or non-existent drug levels and positive antidrug antibodies have been associated with therapeutic failure, there is no clear association between higher drug levels and AE. A cross-sectional study consisting of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients receiving infliximab or vedolizumab at the Sheba Medical Center was performed. Patients completed a questionnaire regarding AEs related to biological therapy. Serum trough levels obtained on the same day were analyzed. Objective measures of outcomes were retrieved from medical records. Questionnaires were completed by infliximab (n = 169) and vedolizumab (n = 88)-treated therapy patients. Higher infliximab levels were only numerically associated with the occurrence of at least one AE (p = 0.08). When excluding fatigue and abdominal pain, higher infliximab levels were statistically associated with the occurrence of at least one AE (p = 0.03). Vedolizumab drug levels > 18 μg/mL were also linked with the occurrence of more AEs. No specific association was observed between the increased levels of either infliximab or vedolizumab and specific AEs (neurological symptoms, upper GI symptoms, infectious complications, and musculoskeletal symptoms). As significant AEs are very rare, additional multi-center studies are required.

Assessment of Vedolizumab Disease-Drug-Drug Interaction Potential in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Disease-drug-drug interactions (DDDIs) have been identified in some inflammatory diseases in which elevated proinflammatory cytokines can downregulate the expression of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, potentially increasing systemic exposure to drugs metabolized by CYPs. Following anti-inflammatory treatments, CYP expression may return to normal, resulting in reduced drug exposure and diminished clinical efficacy. Vedolizumab has a well-established positive benefit-risk profile in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) and has no known systemic immunosuppressive activity. A stepwise assessment was conducted to evaluate the DDDI potential of vedolizumab to impact exposure to drugs metabolized by CYP3A through cytokine modulation. First, a review of published data revealed that patients with UC or CD have elevated cytokine concentrations relative to healthy subjects; however, these concentrations remained below those reported to impact CYP expression. Exposure to drugs metabolized via CYP3A also appeared comparable between patients and healthy subjects. Second, serum samples from patients with UC or CD who received vedolizumab for 52 weeks were analyzed and compared with healthy subjects. Cytokine concentrations and the 4β-hydroxycholesterol-to-cholesterol ratio, an endogenous CYP3A4 biomarker, were comparable between healthy subjects and patients both before and during vedolizumab treatment. Finally, a medical review of postmarketing DDDI cases related to vedolizumab from the past 6 years was conducted and did not show evidence of any true DDDIs. Our study demonstrated the lack of clinically meaningful effects of disease or vedolizumab treatment on the exposure to drugs metabolized via CYP3A through cytokine modulation in patients with UC or CD.

Incidence of Infections and Malignancy Among Elderly Male Patients with IBD Exposed to Vedolizumab, Prednisone, and 5-ASA Medications: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Vedolizumab (VDZ) is postulated to have a potentially safer side effect profile than other biologic medications owing to its gut-selective mechanism. However, extrapolating these safety data to older patients is challenging because of their underrepresentation in or exclusion from most clinical trials, higher rates of withdrawal, and higher rates of comorbidities. Our aim was to evaluate the absolute risk of infections and malignancies in an elderly group of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exposed to VDZ vs. the absolute risks associated with 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-ASA) medications and chronic steroid use.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study among the US national Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VAHS). Our cohort comprised patients who were followed in the VAHS, had a diagnosis of IBD, and were aged 65 years or older. The patients were divided into three cohorts: primary exposure group (elderly patients on VDZ), assumed low-risk group (elderly patients on 5-ASA only), and assumed high-risk group (elderly patients on chronic prednisone). The low-risk and high-risk groups were matched to the VDZ group on race, gender, IBD type, age, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Primary outcomes gathered and confirmed via chart review included mild infections, severe infections, malignancies, and non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). The results were based on a descriptive analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 497 patients were included in our study with 213, 186, and 98 patients in the VDZ, 5-ASA, and steroid groups, respectively. The total patient-years (PYs) of follow up were 405, 656, and 303 in VDZ, 5-ASA, and steroid groups respectively. The incidence of mild infection was the lowest in the VDZ group with 93.1 outcomes per 1000 PYs as compared to the 5-ASA group (114.4 outcomes per 1000 PYs) and 155.1 outcomes per 1000 PYs in the steroid group. In regard to severe infections, the VDZ group had an incidence of 38.5 outcomes per 1000 PYs as compared to 30.6 outcomes per 1000 PYs in the 5-ASA group and 67.4 outcomes per 1000 PYs in the steroids group. Mild infections with the highest incidence in the VDZ group were upper respiratory infection (including pharyngitis and sinusitis) at 20.3 per 1000 PYs, Clostridium difficile (15.1 per 1000 PYs), and cellulitis (10.0 per 1000 PYs). The severe infection with the highest incidence was pneumonia for each group, with incidence rates of 10.0, 14.0, and 48.6 per 1000 PYs for the VDZ, 5-ASA, and steroid groups, respectively. Incidence of malignancies (excluding NMSC) was numerically similar in the VDZ and 5-ASA group (17.6 and 15.6 per 1000 PYs, respectively), while the steroid group showed a higher incidence of 42.6 per 1000 PYs. NMSC incidence was numerically similar in the VDZ and steroid groups (36.3 and 39.0 per 1000 PYs, respectively), with the 5-ASA group showing a much lower NMSC incidence (4.6 per 1000 PYs).

CONCLUSION

In a large nationwide cohort of elderly patients, we found the safety profile of VDZ among elderly patients with IBD with respect to the risk of infection and malignancy to be numerically similar to elderly patients with IBD taking 5-ASA, and favorable when compared to the elderly patients with IBD taking chronic steroids.

Global research status of gastroenterology and hepatology: A bibliometrics study

BACKGROUND

There are no reports on global research status of gastroenterology and hepatology (GI). This study was conducted to reveal the current global research status and trends in GI.

METHODS

Articles published during 2009 to 2018 in international GI journals were retrieved from the PubMed database. The top 20 countries by output were determined. The gross domestic product (GDP) of each country was also retrieved to figure out the correlation between outputs in GI and economy. The 5 highest-ranking countries were compared in the number of total articles, articles per capita, articles published in top journals, the accumulated impact factor (IF), and average IF. Total articles and articles per capita of the 5 countries were conducted time-trend analysis. The frequently-used terms in titles and abstracts of articles published in 2009 and 2018 were retrieved to conduct co-occurrence analysis to figure out the change of research highlights in GI.

RESULTS

A total of 120,267 articles were included, of which 116,485 articles were from 20 highest-output countries. There was a positive correlation between output and GDP (r = 0.921, P < .001). The USA, Japan, China, Italy, and the UK were the 5 highest-ranking countries. The USA was the largest contributor with 26,215 articles, accounting for 17.4% of the total, but with no significant increasing trend (P = .122). Other 4 countries all showed increasing trends (all P < .001). For articles per capita, Italy ranked 1st among the 5 countries with 1591.0 articles per 10 million. The USA showed a decreasing trend (P = .026), other 4 countries all showed increasing trends (all P < .001). The UK had the highest average IF (6.685). For change of research highlights, it is more inclined to research of endoscopy, inflammatory bowel diseases, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

CONCLUSION

It is delightful that the global research output in GI field would be continuingly increased as the major highest-output countries showed increasing trends. However, the developing countries fell behind both in quantity and quality when compared with developed countries.

Cutaneous Manifestations in Biological-Treated Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Narrative Review

The biologic era has greatly improved the treatment of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Biologics can however induce a wide variety of skin eruptions, especially those targeting the TNF-α and Th17 pathway. These include infusion reactions, eczema, psoriasis, lupus, alopecia areata, vitiligo, lichenoid reactions, granulomatous disorders, vasculitis, skin cancer, and cutaneous infections. It is important to recognize these conditions as treatment-induced adverse reactions and adapt the treatment strategy accordingly. Some conditions can be treated topically while others require cessation or switch of the biological therapy. TNF-α antagonists have the highest rate adverse skin eruptions followed by ustekinumab and anti-integrin receptor blockers. In this review, we provide an overview of the most common skin eruptions which can be encountered in clinical practice when treating IBD (Inflammatory bowel disease) patients and propose a therapeutic approach for each condition.

Factors influencing the outcome of vedolizumab treatment: Real-life data with objective outcome measurements

Background

Vedolizumab (VDZ), a humanised monoclonal antibody against a4ß7‐integrin, has shown efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is of importance to assess the mid‐to long‐term efficacy of VDZ using real‐life data.

Objective

Our study aimed to determine the efficacy of VDZ in patients with IBD with and without prior exposure to anti‐tumour necrosis factor (TNF) treatments in a real‐life setting. Furthermore, we investigated confounding factors influencing the remission to VDZ.

Methods

Patients participating in the Swiss IBD Cohort Study were included in this study. Remission was defined as calprotectin less than 200 mg/kg stool and/or mucosal healing determined by endoscopy. End points were determined between Months 4 and 8 (T1) and between Months 12 and 16 (T2) after VDZ induction.

Results

Remission was reported in 50.5% (110/218) of patients in T1 (48.7% Crohn's disease [CD] and 52.5% ulcerative colitis [UC]) and 46.8% (102/218) in T2 (47% CD and 46.5% UC). In UC patients, a significantly higher remission rate was achieved in T2 among anti‐TNF‐naive patients (57.7%) compared to anti‐TNF‐experienced patients (34.7%; p = 0.02; odds ratio = 0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.17–0.87). In patients with CD, no difference could be seen in either evaluation interval. Multivariable analysis showed that disease duration significantly influenced remission rates among UC patients. A late response to VDZ therapy with an achievement of remission in T2 was seen in a fifth of all patients (CD: 21.7%, UC: 20.8%). VDZ treatment was stopped in a third of all patients (31.8%) due to nonresponse, adverse events or aggravation of extra‐intestinal manifestations.

Conclusion

In a real‐life national cohort setting, VDZ induced remission in more than half of IBD patients. Previous treatment with anti‐TNF agents was associated with a significant lower efficacy of VDZ in UC but not in CD patients.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease 2020

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a general term for chronic or remitting/relapsing inflammatory diseases of the intestinal tract and generally refers to ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Since 1950, the number of patients with IBD in Japan has been increasing. The etiology of IBD remains unclear; however, recent research data indicate that the pathophysiology of IBD involves abnormalities in disease susceptibility genes, environmental factors and intestinal bacteria. The elucidation of the mechanism of IBD has facilitated therapeutic development. UC and CD display heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management depends on the understanding and tailoring of evidence-based interventions by physicians. In 2020, seventeen IBD experts of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology revised the previous guidelines for IBD management published in 2016. This English version was produced and modified based on the existing updated guidelines in Japanese. The Clinical Questions (CQs) of the previous guidelines were completely revised and categorized as follows: Background Questions (BQs), CQs, and Future Research Questions (FRQs). The guideline was composed of a total of 69 questions: 39 BQs, 15 CQs, and 15 FRQs. The overall quality of the evidence for each CQ was determined by assessing it with reference to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, and the strength of the recommendation was determined by the Delphi consensus process. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance for on-site physicians is provided regarding indications for proceeding with the diagnosis and treatment.

Frequency of Positive Conversion of Interferon-Gamma Release Assay Results Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treated With Non-tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Considering the risk of reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), not only before starting tumor necrosis factor inhibitors but also before non-TNF inhibitor therapy, LTBI screening is routinely recommended for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, data on the positive conversion of LTBI test results during non-TNF inhibitor therapy are scarce. Among IBD patients treated with vedolizumab and/or ustekinumab, a total of 91 patients who had negative baseline interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) results, assessed by QuantiFERON^®-TB Gold In-tube or QuantiFERON^®-TB Gold Plus, were enrolled. Serial LTBI test results after starting non-TNF inhibitor therapy were collected, and patients' clinical characteristics were analyzed. Positive IGRA conversion was observed in six of 91 patients (6.6%). The cumulative IGRA conversion-free survival rates after starting therapy were 97.7% after 1 year and 86.7% after 2 years. Ulcerative colitis was more common among converters compared with non-converters (66.7 vs. 23.5%, P = 0.040). Among six converters, four had been treated with vedolizumab, one with ustekinumab, and the other with vedolizumab followed by ustekinumab. All six patients had been previously exposed to TNF inhibitors before non-TNF inhibitor therapy: five to infliximab and one to both infliximab and adalimumab. After positive IGRA conversion, none of the six converters developed active tuberculosis while maintaining non-TNF inhibitor therapy (median 6.8 months, range 0.4-32.1 months). Positive IGRA conversion among IBD patients treated with vedolizumab and/or ustekinumab appears to occur somewhat frequently, but its clinical implications remain to be elucidated.

The treatment approach to inflammatory bowel disease in 2020

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multiple new medications with novel mechanisms of action are now available to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Identifying the appropriate patients in whom to use these therapies is critical in maximizing benefit and reducing unnecessary risks. Once the appropriate therapy is selected, using a treat-to-target algorithm including symptomatic, biochemical, and endoscopic monitoring can improve clinical outcomes. If symptoms recur, these same principles, coupled with therapeutic drug monitoring, should be considered to confirm inflammation and determine next therapeutic steps.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple network meta-analyses can assist clinicians in determining the ideal biologic or small molecule therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe IBD. Once selected, several clinical trials have demonstrated that follow-up in 3 to 4 months, coupled with fecal calprotectin or C-reactive protein monitoring, can improve clinical remission and mucosal healing rates. Structural assessment should be performed via colonoscopy, enterography, or capsule endoscopy, dependent on disease location, at 9--12 months to confirm healing.

SUMMARY

Appropriate disease stratification, coupled with biologic or small molecule medication selection and treat-to-target follow-up, can greatly assist clinicians who are managing patients with IBD in achieving the greatest potential benefits of medical therapy.

Irish data on the safety and efficacy of vedolizumab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

This study reviews the safety and efficacy of treatment with vedolizumab for patients with inflammatory bowel disease across 9 Irish hospitals. It generates valuable and timely real-world data on treatment outcomes to add to the existing evidence base. Our population represents a refractory cohort with most patients previously exposed to at least one anti-TNFa agent and expressing an inflammatory phenotype. Results are reassuringly similar to larger international studies with additional insights into potential predictors of treatment response. This study further supports the safety and efficacy of vedolizumab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Key SummaryVedolizumab has growing real world data on its safety and efficacy in the treatment of IBD. Data on predictors of response are lacking. Studies such as VARSITY require new real-world data to help identify the place VDZ will occupy in the treatment algorithm for IBDThis study provides national Irish data on the safety and efficacy of VDZ in the treatment of IBD. It gives insight into various predictors of response for both UC and CD. It strengthens the available body of evidence on the use of VDZ and helps us determine its position on the treatment algorithm.

Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease patients aged 60 and over: an observational multicenter UK experience

Background

The GEMINI trials established the efficacy of vedolizumab in moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and demonstrated a favorable safety profile, suggesting it may be advantageous in older patients at greater risk of treatment-related complications. However, there is a paucity of data exploring the outcomes of vedolizumab in this group. Our objective was to determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in older IBD patients within a real-world multicenter UK cohort.

Methods

A retrospective review of electronic records across 6 UK hospitals was undertaken to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety outcomes of vedolizumab in IBD patients aged ≥60 at start of therapy. Rates of clinical response, remission and corticosteroid-free remission were assessed at weeks 14 and 52, using validated clinical indices, and were compared to historical controls from real-world vedolizumab-treated cohorts unstratified by age.

Results

Of 74 patients aged 60 years or above (median 66 years), 48 were included in our effectiveness analysis (29 ulcerative colitis, 19 Crohn’s disease). Rates of clinical response, remission and corticosteroid-free remission at week 14 were 64%, 48% and 30%, respectively. By week 52, the rates of clinical response, remission, and corticosteroid-free remission were 52%, 38%, and 32%, respectively. Six (8%) patients experienced adverse effects. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were comparable to those of age-unstratified vedolizumab-treated cohorts.

Conclusion

Our 1-year outcome data suggests that vedolizumab is safe and effective in older IBD patients and broadly comparable to cohorts unselected by age.