Safety and tolerability of regadenoson CMR

Impact of physiological and coronary artery disease risk factors on myocardial perfusion in stress computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging

To analyze the correlation between the main perfusion parameters of the left ventricle and various physiological and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors or comorbidities using dynamic stress computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) in patients without obstructive coronary stenosis. This retrospective analysis included 119 patients without obstructive coronary artery stenosis in computed tomography angiography (CTA), and without perfusion defects in CT-MPI. Patients were categorized into groups based on the presence or absence of physiological and CAD risk factors or comorbidities. The global myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial blood volume (MBV), and perfused capillary blood volume (PCBV) of the left ventricle were compared between groups, and correlations with continuous variables were analyzed. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify independent factors. Perfusion parameters were higher (MBF, 149.41 ± 26.38 vs. 159.20 ± 21.31 ml/100 ml/min, MBV, 17.09 ± 2.37 vs.18.84 ± 1.89, and PCBV, 9.82 ± 2.21 vs. 11.47 ± 1.79 ml/100 ml [all P < 0.05]) in female patients than in male patients. Hypertension and overweight/obesity resulted in lower perfusion parameters (hypertension vs. normotension: MBF, 148.09 ± 21.15 vs. 161.47 ± 25.13 ml/100 ml/min, PCBV, 10.25 ± 2.23 vs. 11.22 ± 1.96 ml/100 ml; overweight/obesity vs. none: MBF, 148.82 ± 20.98 vs. 159.51 ± 25.44 ml/100 ml/min, PCBV, 10.20 ± 1.93 vs. 11.15 ± 2.22 ml/100 ml [all P < 0.05]). Body surface area (BSA), body mass index, stress heart rate (HR), incremental HR, coronary total plaque volume, and stress systolic blood pressure were significantly correlated with perfusion parameters (all P < 0.05). Stress HR, BSA, and hypertension were independent predictors of MBF, stress HR and sex were independent predictors of MBV, and stress HR and BSA were independent predictors of PCBV. Dynamic stress CT-MPI myocardial perfusion is affected by stress HR, sex, and BSA, and can identify early perfusion distribution in hypertension and obesity/overweight.

Reduced response to regadenoson with increased weight: An artificial intelligence-based quantitative myocardial perfusion study

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting evidence regarding the response to a fixed dose of regadenoson in patients with high body weight. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of regadenoson in patients with varying body weights using novel quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion parameters in addition to standard clinical markers.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with typical angina and/or risk factors for coronary artery disease (N = 217) underwent regadenoson stress CMR perfusion imaging using a dual-sequence quantitative protocol with perfusion parameters generated from an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm. CMR was performed on 1.5T scanners using a standard 0.4 mg injection of regadenoson. A cohort of consecutive patients undergoing adenosine stress perfusion (N = 218) was used as a control group.

RESULTS

An inverse association of myocardial perfusion reserve and weight (mean decrease -0.05 per 10 kg increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.009/-0.0001, P = 0.045) was noted in the regadenoson group but not in patients stressed with adenosine (P = 0.77). Adjusted logistic regression analysis revealed a 10 kg increase resulted in 36% increased odds for inadequate stress response (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36, 95% CI 1.10-1.69, P = 0.005). Moreover, a significant interaction (OR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16, P = 0.012) between stressor type (regadenoson vs adenosine) and weight was noted. This was also confirmed in the propensity-matched subgroup (P = 0.024) and was not attenuated after adjustment (P = 0.041). Body surface area (BSA) (P = 0.006) but not body mass index (P = 0.055) was differentially associated with inadequate response conditional to the stressor used, and this association remained significant after adjustment for confounders (P = 0.025). Patients in the highest quartile of weight (>93 kg) or BSA (>2.06 m2) had substantially increased odds for inadequate response with regadenoson (OR = 8.19, 95% CI 2.04-32.97, P = 0.003 for increased weight and OR = 7.75, 95% CI 1.93-31.13, P = 0.004 for increased BSA). Both weight and BSA had excellent discriminative ability for inadequate regadenoson response (receiver operating characteristic area under curves 0.84 and 0.83, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Using quantitative perfusion CMR in patients undergoing pharmacological stress with regadenoson, we found an inverse relationship between patient weight and both clinical response and myocardial perfusion parameters. A fixed-dose bolus approach may not be adequate to induce maximal hyperemia in patients with increased weight. Weight-adjusted stressors, such as adenosine, may be considered instead in patients with body weight >93 kg and BSA >2.06 m2.

The Role and Advantages of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Ischemia

Ischemic heart disease continues to be the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. For the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease, some form of cardiac stress test involving exercise or pharmacological stimulation continues to play an important role, despite advances within modalities like computer tomography for the noninvasive detection and characterization of epicardial coronary lesions. Among noninvasive stress imaging tests, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) combines several capabilities that are highly relevant for the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease: assessment of wall motion abnormalities, myocardial perfusion imaging, and depiction of replacement and interstitial fibrosis markers by late gadolinium enhancement techniques and T1 mapping. On top of these qualities, CMR is also well tolerated and safe in most clinical scenarios, including in the presence of cardiovascular implantable devices, while in the presence of renal disease, gadolinium-based contrast should only be used according to guidelines. CMR also offers outstanding viability assessment and prognostication of cardiovascular events. The last 2019 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for chronic coronary syndromes has positioned stress CMR as a class I noninvasive imaging technique for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients. In the present review, we present the current state-of-the-art assessment of myocardial ischemia by stress perfusion CMR, highlighting its advantages and current shortcomings. We discuss the safety, clinical, and cost-effectiveness aspects of gadolinium-based CMR-perfusion imaging for ischemic heart disease assessment.

State-of-the-Art of Myocardial Perfusion by CMR: A Practical View

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) outstands among diseases threatening public health. Essential for its management are the continuous advances in medical and interventional therapies, although a prompt and accurate diagnosis and prognostic stratification are equally important. Besides information on the anatomy of coronary arteries, well covered nowadays by invasive and non-invasive angiographic techniques, there are also other components of the disease with clinical impact, as the presence of myocardial necrosis, the extent of pump function impairment, and the presence and extent of inducible myocardial ischemia, that must be considered in every patient. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is a multiparametric diagnostic imaging technique that provides reliable information on these issues. Regarding the detection and grading of inducible ischemia in particular, the technique has been widely adopted in the form of myocardial perfusion sequences under vasodilator stress, which is the subject of this review. While the analysis of images is conventionally performed by visual inspection of dynamic first-pass studies, with the inherent dependency on the operator capability, the recent introduction of a reliable application of quantitative perfusion (QP) represents a significant advance in the field. QP is based on a dual-sequence strategy for conversion of signal intensities into contrast agent concentration units and includes a full automatization of processes such as myocardial blood flow (MBF) calculation (in mL/min/g), generation of a pixel-wise flow mapping, myocardial segmentation, based on machine learning, and allocation of MBF values to myocardial segments. The acquisition of this protocol during induced vasodilation and at rest gives values of stress/rest MBF (in mL/min/g) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), both global and per segment. Dual-sequence QP has been successfully validated against different reference methods, and its prognostic value has been shown in large longitudinal studies. The fact of the whole process being automated, without operator interaction, permits to conceive new interesting scenarios of integration of CMR into systems of entirely automated diagnostic workflow in patients with IHD.

Safety and tolerability of regadenoson in comparison with adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Data from a multicentre prospective registry

To assess the feasibility and incidence of immediate complications of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with regadenoson in comparison with adenosine in a large referral population. This is a large, multicenter, prospective registry of vasodilator stress-CMR in a referral population. We recorded the clinical and demographic data, quality of test, CMR findings, hemodynamic data, and complications. Between January 2016 and July 2019, 2908 patients underwent stress-CMR, 2253 with regadenoson and 655 with adenosine. 25.1% of patients had previously known coronary artery disease (CAD). In 305 patients regadenoson was used due to presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma, while in 1948 subjects regadenoson was used as first-line vasodilator. Quality was optimal in 90.0%, suboptimal in 9.5%, and poor in 0.5%. Images were diagnostic in 98.9%. After stress with regadenoson, aminophylline 200 mg was administered intravenously in all patients. No patient died or had severe immediate complications with regadenoson as opposed to 2 severe bronchospasm with adenosine (p = 0.05). 11 patients (0.5%) had non-severe complications with regadenoson and five patients (0.8%) with adenosine (p = n.s.). Only two patients (0.088%) had non-severe bronchospasm after regadenoson administration. All complications were solved in the CMR unit, with no need for further specific care. Factors significantly associated with presence of complications were history of COPD or asthma and detection of inducible ischaemia. Patients had significantly more minor symptoms when adenosine was used (66.0% vs. 18.4%, p < 0.0001). Stress-CMR with regadenoson is feasible, providing diagnostic information in a referral population. Regadenoson had an excellent safety profile and better tolerability than adenosine, with no serious immediate complications and low incidence of non-severe complications. Only inducible ischaemia and previous history of COPD or asthma were associated with complications after regadenoson-CMR. The incidence of minor symptoms was low.

Vasodilatation stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: Feasibility, workflow and safety in a large prospective registry of more than 35,000 patients

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is an accurate technique for assessing ventricular function, myocardial perfusion and viability; its development remains limited mainly because of logistical and time constraints. Data regarding optimization of a dedicated stress CMR workflow are needed.

AIMS

This study aimed to describe the optimization of a dedicated workflow, and to assess the feasibility and safety of stress CMR in a large registry of>35,000 patients.

METHODS

A large single-centre French registry of vasodilator stress CMR included consecutive patients referred between 2008 and 2019 for the detection of inducible ischaemia. Stress CMR was performed at 1.5 Tesla using dipyridamole. Clinical and demographic data, test quality, CMR findings, haemodynamic data and complications were recorded prospectively. A locally optimized workflow was described and evaluated.

RESULTS

Among the 35,862 patients referred for vasodilator stress CMR (mean age 68.9±11.8 years; 64.1% male), the stress CMR protocol was completed in 35,013 (97.6%) patients; 144 (0.3%) patients with missing baseline data were excluded. The mean examination duration was 27±5min, with image quality optimal in 90.8%, suboptimal in 7.1% and poor in 0.5% of cases. Images were diagnostic in 97.9% of patients. No patients died during or immediately after CMR. Fifty-six (0.16%) patients had severe complications. The incidence of non-severe complications was low (1.5%), whereas minor symptoms occurred frequently (35.5%). The presence of ischaemia was associated with a higher incidence of severe complications, non-severe complications and minor symptoms (all P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This single-centre prospective registry of>35,000 referral patients with known or suspected CAD showed that stress CMR was feasible in clinical routine practice, with high diagnostic image quality and an excellent safety profile. Inducible ischaemia was associated with severe complications, non-severe complications and minor symptoms.

Contemporary Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in the Management of Patients with Suspected or Known Coronary Artery Disease

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a useful non-invasive radiation-free imaging modality for the management of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). CMR cine imaging provides the "gold standard" assessment of ventricular function, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) provides useful data for the diagnosis and extent of myocardial scar and viability, while stress imaging is an established technique for the detection of myocardial perfusion defects indicating ischemia. Beyond its role in the diagnosis of CAD, CMR allows accurate risk stratification of patients with established CAD. This review aims to summarize the data regarding the role of CMR in the contemporary management of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress and rest T1-mapping using regadenoson for detection of ischemic heart disease compared to healthy controls

Background

Adenosine stress T1-mapping on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can differentiate between normal, ischemic, infarcted, and remote myocardial tissue classes without the need for contrast agents. Regadenoson, a selective coronary vasodilator, is often used in stress perfusion imaging when adenosine is contra-indicated, and has advantages in ease of administration, safety profile, and clinical workflow. We aimed to characterize the regadenoson stress T1-mapping response in healthy individuals, and to investigate its ability to differentiate between myocardial tissue classes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods

Eleven healthy controls and 25 patients with CAD underwent regadenoson stress perfusion CMR, as well as rest and stress ShMOLLI T1-mapping. Native T1 values and stress T1 reactivity were derived for normal myocardium in healthy controls and for different myocardial tissue classes in patients with CAD.

Results

Healthy controls had normal myocardial native T1 values at rest (931 ± 22 ms) with significant global regadenoson stress T1 reactivity (δT1 = 8.2 ± 0.8% relative to baseline; p < 0.0001). Infarcted myocardium had significantly higher resting T1 (1215 ± 115 ms) than ischemic, remote, and normal myocardium (all p < 0.0001) with an abolished stress T1 response (δT1 = −0.8% [IQR: −1.9–0.5]). Ischemic myocardium had elevated resting T1 compared to normal (964 ± 57 ms; p < 0.01) with an abolished stress T1 response (δT1 = 0.5 ± 1.6%). Remote myocardium in patients had comparable resting T1 to normal (949 ms [IQR: 915–973]; p = 0.06) with blunted stress reactivity (δT1 = 4.3% [IQR: 3.1–6.3]; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Healthy controls demonstrate significant stress T1 reactivity during regadenoson stress. Regadenoson stress and rest T1-mapping is a viable alternative to adenosine and exercise for the assessment of CAD and can distinguish between normal, ischemic, infarcted, and remote myocardium.

•

Regadenoson has advantages over adenosine in terms of administration, safety profile, and clinical workflow.

•

There are distinct tissue characteristics for normal, ischemic, infarcted, and remote myocardium.

•

Healthy controls demonstrate significant stress T1 reactivity during vasodilator stress.

•

Regadenoson stress T1-mapping can distinguish between different myocardial tissue classes.

•

Regadenoson stress T1-mapping is a viable alternative to adenosine and exercise for the assessment of coronary artery disease.

Splenic switch-off as a predictor for coronary adenosine response: validation against 13N-ammonia during co-injection myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner

BACKGROUND

Inadequate coronary adenosine response is a potential cause for false negative ischemia testing. Recently, the splenic switch-off (SSO) sign has been identified as a promising tool to ascertain the efficacy of adenosine during vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). We assessed the value of SSO to predict adenosine response, defined as an increase in myocardial blood flow (MBF) during quantitative stress myocardial perfusion 13 N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 64 patients who underwent simultaneous CMR and PET myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner with co-injection of gadolinium based contrast agent (GBCA) and 13N-ammonia during rest and adenosine-induced stress. A myocardial flow reserve (MFR) of  > 1.5 or ischemia as assessed by PET were defined as markers for adequate coronary adenosine response. The presence or absence of SSO was visually assessed. The stress-to-rest intensity ratio (SIR) was calculated as the ratio of stress over rest peak signal intensity for splenic tissue. Additionally, the spleen-to-myocardium ratio, defined as the relative change of spleen to myocardial signal, was calculated for stress (SMRstress) and rest.

RESULTS

Sixty-one (95%) patients were coronary adenosine responders, but SSO was absent in 18 (28%) patients. SIR and SMRstress were significantly lower in patients with SSO (SIR: 0.56 ± 0.13 vs. 0.93 ± 0.23; p < 0.001 and SMRstress: 1.09 ± 0.47 vs. 1.68 ± 0.62; p < 0.001). Mean hyperemic and rest MBF were 2.12 ± 0.68 ml/min/g and 0.78 ± 0.26 ml/min/g, respectively. MFR was significantly higher in patients with vs. patients without presence of SSO (3.07 ± 1.03 vs. 2.48 ± 0.96; p = 0.038), but there was only a weak inverse correlation between SMRstress and MFR (R = -0.378; p = 0.02) as well as between SIR and MFR (R = -0.356; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of SSO implies adequate coronary adenosine-induced MBF response. Its absence, however, is not a reliable indicator for failed adenosine-induced coronary vasodilatation.

[Safety and Effectiveness of Volumetric Computed Tomography of the Heart in Combination with a PharmacologicaTest with Adenosine Triphosphate in the Diagnosis of Coronary Heart Disease]

Aim      To evaluate safety and efficacy of sodium adenosine triphosphate (ATP) as a vasodilator in assessment of left ventricular (LV) myocardial perfusion and in verification of ischemia by cardiac volumetric computed tomography (CT).Material and methods  The study included 58 patients with suspected ischemic heart disease (IHD). For all included patients, cardiac volumetric CT with a pharmacological ATP test was performed. The rate of adverse effects was analyzed during the ATP infusion. Results of the study were compared with data from using other noninvasive methods for IHD diagnosis by calculating Cohen's kappa, the measure of agreement between two variables.Results The test performed during CT showed good tolerability of the ATP infusion, a low rate of moderate adverse reactions (8.6 %), and the absence of severe side effects. Results of diagnosing IHD with cardiac volumetric CT with the ATP pharmacological test were comparable with data from using other methods for noninvasive verification of LV myocardial ischemia (bicycle ergometry, treadmill test, stress echocardiography) in combination with coronarography or CT coronarography.Conclusion      ATP appears a safe pharmacological agent for diagnosing transient LV myocardial ischemia. ATP can be recommended as a vasodilator for evaluation of perfusion using cardiac volumetric CT.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging myocardial perfusion reserve index in heart transplant patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare the myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) measured during stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with regadenoson in patients with heart transplants versus in patients without heart transplants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared 20 consecutive asymptomatic heart transplant patients without suspicion of microvascular disease who underwent stress cardiac MRI with regadenoson and coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) to rule out cardiac allograft vasculopathy versus 16 patients without transplants who underwent clinically indicated stress cardiac MRI who were negative for ischemia and had no signs of structural heart disease. We estimated MPRI semiquantitatively after calculating the up-slope of the first-pass enhancement curve and dividing the value obtained during stress by the value obtained at rest. We compared MPRI in the two groups. Patients with positive findings for ischemia on stress cardiac MRI or significant coronary stenosis on coronary CTA were referred for conventional coronary angiography.

RESULTS

More than half the patients remained asymptomatic during the stress test. Stress cardiac MRI was positive for ischemia in two heart transplant patients; these findings were confirmed at coronary CTA and at conventional coronary angiography. Patients with transplants had lower end-diastolic volume index (59.3±15.2 ml/m² vs. 71.4±15.9 ml/m² in those without transplants, p=0.03), lower MPRI (1.35±0.19 vs. 1.6±0.28 in those without transplants, p=0.003), and a less pronounced hemodynamic response to regadenoson (mean increase in heart rate 13.1±5.4 bpm vs. 28.5±8.9 bpm in those without transplants, p <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Stress cardiac MRI with regadenoson is safe. In the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease, patients with heart transplants have lower MPRI than patients without transplants, suggesting microvascular disease. The hemodynamic response to regadenoson is less pronounced in patients with heart transplants than in patients without heart transplants.

Safety of regadenoson for vasodilation in cardiac MRI stress tests

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety of regadenoson for vasodilation in cardiac MRI stress tests to detect myocardial ischemia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed cardiac MRI studies done in 120 patients (mean age, 67±11.6 years; 88 men) with suspected ischemic heart disease or known coronary disease who had clinical indications for cardiac MRI stress tests. All studies were done on a 1.5 T scanner (MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens Healthineers) using regadenoson (5ml, 0.4mg) for vasodilation. We recorded cardiovascular risk factors, medications, and indications for the test as well as vital signs at rest and under stress and the symptoms and adverse effects induced by the drug.

RESULTS

No symptoms developed in 52.6% of patients. The most common symptoms were central chest pain (25%) and dyspnea (12%). At peak stress, the mean increase in heart rate was 23.9±11.4 beats per minute and the mean decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 7.1±18.8mmHg and 5.3±9.2mmHg, respectively (p <0.001). The response to regadenoson was less pronounced in obese and diabetic patients. The increase in heart rate was greater in symptomatic patients (27.4±11.2 bpm vs. 20.6±10.7 bpm in asymptomatic patients, p=0.001). No severe adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Regadenoson is well tolerated and can be safely used for cardiac MRI stress tests.

Caffeine and Primary (Migraine) Headaches-Friend or Foe?

Background: The actions of caffeine as an antagonist of adenosine receptors have been extensively studied, and there is no doubt that both daily and sporadic dietary consumption of caffeine has substantial biological effects on the nervous system. Caffeine influences headaches, the migraine syndrome in particular, but how is unclear. Materials and Methods: This is a narrative review based on selected articles from an extensive literature search. The aim of this study is to elucidate and discuss how caffeine may affect the migraine syndrome and discuss the potential pathophysiological pathways involved. Results: Whether caffeine has any significant analgesic and/or prophylactic effect in migraine remains elusive. Neither is it clear whether caffeine withdrawal is an important trigger for migraine. However, withdrawal after chronic exposure of caffeine may cause migraine-like headache and a syndrome similar to that experienced in the prodromal phase of migraine. Sensory hypersensitivity however, does not seem to be a part of the caffeine withdrawal syndrome. Whether it is among migraineurs is unknown. From a modern viewpoint, the traditional vascular explanation of the withdrawal headache is too simplistic and partly not conceivable. Peripheral mechanisms can hardly explain prodromal symptoms and non-headache withdrawal symptoms. Several lines of evidence point at the hypothalamus as a locus where pivotal actions take place. Conclusion: In general, chronic consumption of caffeine seems to increase the burden of migraine, but a protective effect as an acute treatment or in severely affected patients cannot be excluded. Future clinical trials should explore the relationship between caffeine withdrawal and migraine, and investigate the effects of long-term elimination.

Regadenoson Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children With Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Artery Disease

Coronary artery (CA) stenosis and occlusion in convalescent Kawasaki disease (KD) is progressive and may result in myocardial infarction. The use of regadenoson, a strong selective CA vasodilator with low side effect profile, for stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has not been studied in children with KD. The safety, feasibility, and diagnostic utility of regadenoson stress CMR was assessed in children with KD and CA abnormalities. A retrospective review of regadenoson stress CMR in children with convalescent KD was performed. Hemodynamics changes after regadenoson administration and adverse effects were recorded. First-pass perfusion was evaluated at rest and during pharmacologic stress. The results were compared with anatomic CA imaging. Forty-one stress CMR (18 sedated examinations, 44%) were performed successfully in 32 patients. Median age was 11.2 years (range 2.2 to 18.6) and weight 41 kg (range 13 to 93.4). Heart rate increased 66 ± 25% (p <0.005) after regadenoson. Minor adverse events occurred in 6 sedated and 1 unsedated patients. Hypoperfusion during stress occurred in 16 of 41 (39%), including 5 inducible, 9 inducible and fixed, and 2 fixed lesions. Late gadolinium enhancement was present in 10 of 16 with hypoperfusion and in 1 without hypoperfusion. Stress CMR had 100% positive agreement and >90% negative and overall agreement with moderate-to-severe CA stenoses. Four patients with hypoperfusion underwent revascularization for severe CA stenoses. In conclusion, regadenoson stress CMR is hemodynamically safe and feasible in children with KD and CA disease. It has excellent agreement with CA angiography and aided decision-making to proceed with revascularization.

Phase I Study of AMG 337, a Highly Selective Small-molecule MET Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

This first-in-human, open-label phase I study evaluated AMG 337, an oral, highly selective small-molecule inhibitor of MET in advanced solid tumors.Patients and Methods: Patients enrolled into dose-escalation cohorts received AMG 337 up to 400 mg once daily or up to 250 mg twice daily, following a modified 3+3+3 design. Dose expansion was conducted in MET-amplified patients at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Primary endpoints included assessment of adverse events (AEs), establishment of the MTD, and pharmacokinetics; clinical response was a secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

The safety analysis set included 111 patients who received ≥1 dose of AMG 337. Thirteen patients had ≥1 AE qualifying as dose-limiting toxicity. The MTD was determined to be 300 mg once daily; the MTD for twice-daily dosing was not reached. Most frequent treatment-related AEs were headache (63%) and nausea (31%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 23 patients (21%), most commonly headache (n = 6) and fatigue (n = 5). Maximum plasma concentration occurred at 3.0 hours following 300-mg once-daily dosing, indicating AMG 337 absorption soon after treatment. Objective response rate was 9.9% (11/111; 95% CI, 5.1%-17.0%) in all patients and 29.6% (8/27; 95% CI, 13.8%-50.2%) in MET-amplified patients; median (range) duration of response was 202 (51-1,430+) days in all patients and 197 (64-1,430+) days in MET-amplified patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral AMG 337 was tolerated with manageable toxicities, with an MTD and recommended phase II dose of 300 mg once daily. The promising response rate observed in patients with heavily pretreated MET-amplified tumors warrants further investigation.See related commentary by Ma, p. 2375.

Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

There is a critical need for non-invasive methods to detect coronary allograft vasculopathy and to risk stratify heart transplant recipients. Vasodilator stress testing using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a promising technique for this purpose. We aimed to evaluate the safety and the prognostic value of regadenoson stress CMR in heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

To evaluate the safety, we assessed adverse effects in a retrospective matched cohort study of consecutive heart transplant recipients who underwent regadenoson stress CMR matched in a 2:1 ratio to age- and gender-matched non-heart transplant patients. To evaluate the prognostic value, we compared the outcomes of patients with abnormal vs. normal regadenoson stress CMRs using a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, percutaneous intervention, cardiac hospitalization, retransplantation or death.

RESULTS

For the safety analysis, 234 regadenoson stress CMR studies were included - 78 performed in 57 heart transplant recipients and 156 performed in non-heart transplant patients. Those in heart transplant recipients were performed at a median of 2.74 years after transplantation. Thirty-four (44%) CMR studies were performed in the first two years after heart transplantation. There were no differences in the rates of adverse effects between heart transplant recipients and non-heart transplant patients. To study the prognostic value of regadenoson stress CMRs, 20 heart transplant recipients with abnormal regadenoson stress CMRs were compared to 37 with normal regadenoson stress CMRs. An abnormal regadenoson stress CMR was associated with a significantly higher incidence of the composite endpoint compared with a normal regadenoson stress CMR (3-year cumulative incidence estimates of 32.1% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Regadenoson stress CMR is safe and well tolerated in heart transplant recipients, with no incidence of sinus node dysfunction or high-degree atrioventricular block, including in the first two years after heart transplantation. An abnormal regadenoson stress CMR identifies heart transplant recipients at a higher risk for major adverse cardiovascular events.

Myocardial Stress Perfusion MRI: Experience in Pediatric and Young-Adult Patients Following Arterial Switch Operation Utilizing Regadenoson

Dextro-transposition of the great arteries (D-TGA) is one of the most common cyanotic heart lesions. The arterial switch operation (ASO) is the preferred surgical palliation for D-TGA. One of the primary concerns following the ASO is complications arising from the coronary artery transfer. There is a need for myocardial perfusion assessment within ASO patients. There is no report on the utility of regadenoson as a stress agent in children following ASO. Our objective was to observe the safety and feasibility of regadenoson as a pharmacologic stressor for perfusion cardiac MR in a pilot cohort of pediatric and young-adult patients who have undergone ASO. We reviewed our initial experience with regadenoson stress cardiac MR in 36 pediatric and young-adult patients 15.1 ± 4.5 years (range 0.2-22 years) with history of ASO. The weight was 61.6 ± 21.5 kg (range 3.8-93 kg). All patients underwent cardiac MR because of concern for ischemia. Subjects' heart rate and blood pressure were monitored and pharmacologic stress was induced by injection of regadenoson. We evaluated their hemodynamic response and adverse effects using changes in vital signs and onset of symptoms. A pediatric cardiologist and radiologist qualitatively assessed myocardial perfusion and viability images. All stress cardiac MR examinations were completed without adverse events. Resting heart rate was 72 ± 13 beats per minute (bpm) and rose to peak of 120 ± 17 bpm (95 ± 50% increase, p < 0.005) with regadenoson. Image quality was considered good or diagnostic in all cases. A total of 11/36 (31%) patients had a perfusion defect on the stress FPP images. 14 of the 36 patients (39%) underwent cardiac catheterization within 6 months of the CMR and the findings showed excellent agreement. Regadenoson may be a useful coronary hyperemia agent to utilize for pediatric patients following arterial switch procedure when there is concern for ischemia. The ability to administer as a single bolus with one IV makes it advantageous in pediatrics. In a limited number of cases, regadenoson stress perfusion showed excellent agreement with cardiac catheterization.

Cardiac Imaging Modalities and Appropriate Use

Cardiovascular imaging with calcium scoring computed tomography (CT), coronary CT angiography (CCTA), and cardiac MRI (CMR) have advanced rapidly over recent years. These imaging modalities have increased in availability, accessibility, and clinical practicality due to technological advances allowing for significant radiation dose reduction for high-quality CCTA and for rapid and reliable imaging techniques in CMR. Hardware and software developments are continually increasing efficiency and accuracy of postprocessing. In the context of these rapidly developing imaging modalities, it is critical for ordering physicians and providers to be aware of the fundamentals of each modality, imaging challenges and appropriate use criteria.

Effects of adenosine and regadenoson on hemodynamics measured using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Adenosine or regadenoson vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an effective non-invasive strategy for evaluating symptomatic coronary artery disease. Vasodilator injection typically precedes ventricular functional sequences to efficiently reduce overall scanning times, though the effects of vasodilators on CMR-derived ventricular volumes and function are unknown.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 25 healthy subjects to undergo consecutive adenosine and regadenoson administration. Short axis CINE datasets were obtained on a 1.5 T scanner following adenosine (140mcg/kg/min IV for 6 min) and regadenoson (0.4 mg IV over 10 s) at baseline, immediately following administration, at 5 min intervals up to 15 min. Hemodynamic response, bi-ventricular volumes and ejection fractions were determined at each time point.

RESULTS

Peak heart rate was observed early following administration of both adenosine and regadenoson. Heart rate returned to baseline by 10 min post-adenosine while remaining elevated at 15 min post-regadenoson (p = 0.0015). Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) increased immediately following both vasodilators (p < 0.0001 for both) and returned to baseline following adenosine by 10 min (p = 0.8397). Conversely, LVEF following regadenoson remained increased at 10 min (p = 0.003) and 15 min (p = 0.0015) with a mean LVEF increase at 15 min of 4.2 ± 1.3%. Regadenoson resulted in a similar magnitude reduction in both LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) and LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) at 15 min whereas LVESVi resolved at 15 min following adenosine and LVEDVi remained below baseline values (p = 0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

Regadenoson and adenosine have significant and prolonged impact on ventricular volumes and LVEF. In patients undergoing vasodilator stress CMR where ventricular volumes and LVEF are critical components to patient care, ventricular functional sequences should be performed prior to vasodilator use or consider the use of aminophylline in the setting of regadenoson. Additionally, heart rate resolution itself is not an effective surrogate for return of ventricular volumes and LVEF to baseline.

A Phase 1 study evaluating AMG 337 in Asian patients with advanced solid tumors

AMG 337, a selective small-molecule MET inhibitor, was evaluated in Asian patients with advanced solid tumors. Eligible patients orally self-administered AMG 337; the initial dose of 150 mg once daily (QD) was escalated to 300 mg QD (modified 3+3+3 design). Treatment continued until disease progression, intolerability, or death. The primary endpoint was adverse events (AEs) and clinical abnormalities defined as dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary endpoints included other AEs, pharmacokinetics and tumor response. Eleven patients were enrolled. No DLTs occurred. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were headache (73%) and nausea (45%). Cmax and AUC0-24 exposures increased proportionally with dose; t1/2 was comparable between groups; plasma accumulation was minimal over 28 days. One patient (150 mg) had partial response; one patient (300 mg) had stable disease. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of AMG 337 in Asian patients were consistent with those observed in Western patient populations. The study was terminated early.

Cardiac MRI: a Translational Imaging Tool for Characterizing Anthracycline-Induced Myocardial Remodeling

Cardiovascular side effects of cancer therapeutics are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors. Anthracyclines (AC) serve as the backbone of many anti-cancer treatment strategies, but dose-dependent myocardial injury limits their use. Cumulative AC exposure can disrupt the dynamic equilibrium of the myocardial microarchitecture while repeated injury and repair leads to myocyte loss, interstitial myocardial fibrosis, and impaired contractility. Although children are assumed to have greater myocardial plasticity, AC exposure at a younger age portends worse prognosis. In older patients, there is lower overall survival once they develop cardiovascular disease. Because aberrations in the myocardial architecture predispose the heart to a decline in function, early detection with sensitive imaging tools is crucial and the implications for resource utilization are substantial. As a comprehensive imaging modality, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is able to go beyond quantification of ejection fraction and myocardial deformation to characterize adaptive microstructural and microvascular changes that are important to myocardial tissue health. Herein, we describe CMR as an established translational imaging tool that can be used clinically to characterize AC-associated myocardial remodeling.

Myocardial stress perfusion magnetic resonance: initial experience in a pediatric and young adult population using regadenoson

BACKGROUND

Dipyridamole and adenosine are traditional pharmacological stressors for myocardial perfusion. Regadenoson, a selective adenosine A2A agonist, has a lower side effect profile with lower incidence of bronchospasm and bradycardia. There is a growing need for myocardial perfusion assessment within pediatrics. There is no report on the utility of regadenoson as a stress agent in children.

OBJECTIVE

To observe the safety and feasibility of regadenoson as a pharmacologic stressor for perfusion cardiac MR in a pilot cohort of pediatric patients weighing more than 40 kg who have congenital heart disease and pediatric acquired heart disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed our initial experience with regadenoson stress cardiac MR in 31 pediatric patients 15.8 ± 1.7 years (range 12-22 years) with congenital heart disease and acquired heart disease. Mean patient weight was 60 ± 15 kg (range of 40-93 kg). All patients underwent cardiac MR because of concern for ischemia. The cohort included a heterogeneous group of patients at a pediatric institution with potential risk for ischemia. Subjects' heart rate and blood pressure were monitored and pharmacologic stress was induced by injection of 400 mcg of regadenoson. We evaluated their hemodynamic response and adverse effects using changes in vital signs and onset of symptoms. A pediatric cardiologist and radiologist qualitatively assessed myocardial perfusion and viability images.

RESULTS

One child was unable to complete the stress perfusion portion of the examination, but did complete the remaining portion of the CMR. Resting heart rate was 72 ± 14 beats per minute (bpm) and rose to peak of 124 ± 17 bpm (95 ± 50% increase, P < 0.005) with regadenoson. Image quality was considered good or diagnostic in all cases. Three patients had irreversible perfusion defects. Four patients had reversible perfusion defects. Nine of the patients underwent cardiac catheterization with angiography and the findings showed excellent agreement.

CONCLUSION

Regadenoson might be a safe and feasible pharmacologic stress agent for use in cardiac MR in older pediatric patients with congenital heart disease and acquired heart disease. The ease of use as a bolus and the advantage of a prolonged hyperemia make its use appealing in pediatrics. In a limited number of cases, regadenoson stress perfusion showed excellent agreement with cardiac catheterization. Regadenoson might be a viable pharmacologic stress agent in this population.

Assessment of stable coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: Current and emerging techniques

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is established in clinical practice guidelines with a growing evidence base supporting its use to aid the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected or established CAD. CMR is a multi-parametric imaging modality that yields high spatial resolution images that can be acquired in any plane for the assessment of global and regional cardiac function, myocardial perfusion and viability, tissue characterisation and coronary artery anatomy, all within a single study protocol and without exposure to ionising radiation. Advances in technology and acquisition techniques continue to progress the utility of CMR across a wide spectrum of cardiovascular disease, and the publication of large scale clinical trials continues to strengthen the role of CMR in daily cardiology practice. This article aims to review current practice and explore the future directions of multi-parametric CMR imaging in the investigation of stable CAD.

Safety and tolerability of regadenoson for myocardial perfusion imaging - first Danish experience

OBJECTIVES

Evaluating safety and tolerability of the selective A2A receptor agonist, regadenoson, in patients referred for single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).

DESIGN

Observational study of patients referred for MPI stress testing using a 400 μg regadenoson (Rapiscan(®)) bolus. Hemodynamic variables and severity of adverse events (AE) were recorded before, during, and after administration.

RESULTS

A total of 232 patients were included. One or more AE were reported in 90% of patients; the AEs were graded mostly mild to moderate in severity, resolved spontaneously, and were mainly dyspnea, headache, and chest pain. No advanced heart block or bronchospasm were seen. Transient ST-segment changes developed in 10 patients. The maximum increase in heart rate was 19 ± 11 beats/minute. The mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 144 to 139 mmHg (p < 0.0001). Medical intervention was required in three patients: one case with severe hypotension and two cases with chest pain that was relieved with sublingual nitroglycerin. One patient died the day after stress MPI for reasons considered unrelated to regadenoson.

CONCLUSION

Regadenoson for MPI is easy to use with a high frequency of AEs, which are generally mild in severity, transient, and resolve spontaneously.

Technical advances and clinical applications of quantitative myocardial blood flow imaging with cardiac MRI

The recent FAME 2 study highlights the importance of myocardial ischemia assessment, particularly in the post-COURAGE trial era of managing patients with stable coronary artery disease. Qualitative assessment of myocardial ischemia by stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has gained widespread clinical acceptance and utility. Despite the high diagnostic and prognostic performance of qualitative stress CMR, the ability to quantitatively assess myocardial perfusion reserve and absolute myocardial blood flow remains an important and ambitious goal for non-invasive imagers. Quantitative perfusion by stress CMR remains a research technique that has yielded progressively more encouraging results in more recent years. The ability to safely, rapidly, and precisely procure quantitative myocardial perfusion data would provide clinicians with a powerful tool that may substantially alter clinical practice and improve downstream patient outcomes and the cost effectiveness of healthcare delivery. This may also provide a surrogate endpoint for clinical trials, reducing study population sizes and costs through increased power. This review will cover emerging quantitative CMR techniques for myocardial perfusion assessment by CMR, including novel methods, such as 3-dimensional quantitative myocardial perfusion, and some of the challenges that remain before more widespread clinical adoption of these techniques may take place.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in ischemic heart disease

Ischemic heart disease is the major cause of death in developed countries. Recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has appeared as a powerful technique for diagnosis and prognosis of ischemia, as well as for postischemic therapy follow-up. The objective of this chapter is to provide an overview of the role of CMR in assessing ischemic myocardium. It reviews the most recent studies in this field and includes CMR parameters that are already well established in the clinical setting as well as promising or emerging parameters in clinical use.

A rare complication of a common stress test

In 2008, regadenoson, a selective adenosine2A (A_2A) receptor agonist, was approved by the US Federal and Drug Administration for use as a pharmacologic stress agent in myocardial perfusion studies. By stimulating A_2A receptors in coronary smooth muscle, it can increase coronary blood flow by 2.5-fold or greater. Previous data showed non-inferiority of regadenoson in detecting reversible myocardial ischemia, compared to adenosine. Given less serious adverse effects, being better tolerated and easily administered, regadenoson has been widely used for myocardial perfusion imaging. As adenosine receptors have many sub-types and are located in multi-organ systems, regadenoson can cause various adverse effects, including bronchospasm, atrioventricular block, or hypotension. However, adverse effects on the central nervous system are rarely reported. As adenosine receptors (A₁ and A_2A receptors) play a major role in neuron-glial cells interaction, regadenoson can provoke seizure through A_2A receptor activation. We hereby report a case of regadenoson associated-seizure and review seizure mechanism. This may raise more concern for a rare serious adverse effect of regadenoson which should be taken into consideration when selecting cardiac stress modalities. <Learning objective: Regadenoson can provoke seizure through central A_2A receptor activation. This should be taken into consideration when selecting cardiac stress test modalities, particularly in patients with known seizure disorder or history of organic brain disease.>.

Assessment of global myocardial perfusion reserve using cardiovascular magnetic resonance of coronary sinus flow at 3 Tesla

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing clinical use, there is limited data regarding regadenoson in stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). In particular, given its long half-life the optimal stress protocol remains unclear. Although Myocardial Perfusion Reserve (MPR) may provide additive prognostic information, current techniques for its measurement are cumbersome and challenging for routine clinical practice.The aims of this study were: 1) To determine the feasibility of MPR quantification during regadenoson stress CMR by measurement of Coronary Sinus (CS) flow; and 2) to investigate the role of aminophylline reversal during regadenoson stress-CMR.

METHODS

117 consecutive patients with possible myocardial ischemia were prospectively enrolled. Perfusion imaging was performed at 1 minute and 15 minutes after administration of 0.4 mg regadenoson. A subgroup of 41 patients was given aminophylline (100 mg) after stress images were acquired. CS flow was measured using phase-contrast imaging at baseline (pre CS flow), and immediately after the stress (peak CS flow) and rest (post CS flow) perfusion images.

RESULTS

CS flow measurements were obtained in 92% of patients with no adverse events. MPR was significantly underestimated when calculated as peak CS flow/post CS flow as compared to peak CS flow/pre CS flow (2.43±0.20 vs. 3.28±0.32, p=0.03). This difference was abolished when aminophylline was administered (3.35±0.44 vs. 3.30±0.52, p=0.95). Impaired MPR (peak CS flow/pre CS flow<2) was associated with advanced age, diabetes, current smoking and higher Framingham risk score.

CONCLUSIONS

Regadenoson stress CMR with MPR measurement from CS flow can be successfully performed in most patients. This measurement of MPR appears practical to perform in the clinical setting. Residual hyperemia is still present even 15 minutes after regadenoson administration, at the time of resting-perfusion acquisition, and is completely reversed by aminophylline. Our findings suggest routine aminophylline administration may be required when performing stress CMR with regadenoson.