False-positive troponin elevation due to an immunoglobulin-G-cardiac troponin T complex: a case report

Circulating biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis: time for a risk-based approach

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that block immune checkpoints and therefore activate immune cells, allowing them to recognize and attack cancer cells. ICIs have revolutionized oncology practice, but their use has been complicated by immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Of cardiovascular (CV) irAEs, ICI-related myocarditis has received significant attention due to high mortality rates, ranging from 25% to 50%, despite its overall low incidence. Establishing the early diagnosis of ICI-myocarditis is important for early initiation of steroids and consideration of hospitalization in patients who are at risk for hemodynamic compromise and need high acuity care in a tertiary setting. In this review, we summarize the diagnostic and prognostic tools for ICI-myocarditis, including electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, with emphasis on circulating biomarkers. Cardiac troponins (cTns) are an essential component of the diagnosis of ICI-myocarditis, and we provide a summary of the recent studies that utilized different assays (cTnI vs. cTnT) and outcomes (diagnosis vs. prognosis including major adverse cardiac outcomes). With the exponential increase in ICI use across different oncology indications, there is a major need to include biomarkers in risk stratification to guide diagnosis and treatment. Our review proposes a framework for future multisite registries, including cTn evaluation at baseline and at the time of irAE suspicion, with development of central biobanking to allow head-to-head evaluation and clinical validation of different biomarker assays in ICI-myocarditis. This approach, with the inclusion of CV biomarkers into clinical and pragmatic oncology trials, holds promise to improve the early recognition and management of ICI-myocarditis and CV irAEs, thus leading to better outcomes.

"Troponinosis", the Cardiologist's Curse-When Clinic-Laboratory Interaction Unveils the Mystery: A Case Report

Cardiac troponins are key diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction and, more generally, for the detection of myocardial injury. Since the introduction of the first immunochemistry methods, there has been a remarkable evolution in analytical performance, especially concerning a progressive improvement in sensitivity. However, the measurement of circulating troponins remains rarely susceptible to analytical interferences. We report a case of persistently elevated troponin I concentrations in a patient with known ischemic heart disease, which almost led to unnecessary diagnostic-therapeutic interventions. A prompt laboratory consultation by the cardiologist ultimately led to the identification of an analytical interference due to troponin macrocomplexes (macrotroponin) causing elevated troponin values in the absence of a clinical presentation compatible with myocardial damage.

Unexpected high troponin T and I values in a child with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and acute chest pain: a case report

Background

Elevated troponin T (cTnT) and/or troponin I (cTnI) can be ascribed to multiple causes, mostly resulting from cardiac tissue damage and in lesser numbers resulting from non-cardiac related causes. The presence of macrotroponins is easily overlooked, with potentially negative consequences.

Case summary

This case report presents a case study of a 12-year-old child known to have MYH7 gene-associated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with acute chest pain combined with an unexpected high cTnT and cTnI. A cardiac cause was deemed unlikely after additional investigation, as these showed no abnormalities. After consulting a laboratory specialist, it could be concluded that the high cTnT and cTnI were a result of macrotroponin complexes, a protein complex consisting of circulating protein and endogenous autoantibodies against that protein, resulting in elevated values with misguiding and uncertain clinical significance.

Discussion

Awareness of the existence of macrotroponins could have prevented costly diagnostics and prolonged hospital admission with grave psychological impact, especially in children.

Antibody-mediated interferences affecting cardiac troponin assays: recommendations from the IFCC Committee on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers

The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry Committee on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers (IFCC C-CB) provides educational documents to facilitate the interpretation and use of cardiac biomarkers in clinical laboratories and practice. Our aim is to improve the understanding of certain key analytical and clinical aspects of cardiac biomarkers and how these may interplay. Measurements of cardiac troponin (cTn) have a prominent place in the clinical work-up of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. It is therefore important that clinical laboratories know how to recognize and assess analytical issues. Two emerging analytical issues resulting in falsely high cTn concentrations, often several fold higher than the upper reference limit (URL), are antibody-mediated assay interference due to long-lived cTn-antibody complexes, called macrotroponin, and crosslinking antibodies that are frequently referred to as heterophilic antibodies. We provide an overview of antibody-mediated cTn assay interference and provide recommendations on how to confirm the interference and interpret the results.

Frequencies of Anti-Troponin I vs Anti-Troponin T Autoantibodies and Degrees of Interference on Troponin Assays

OBJECTIVE

Presence of autoantibodies against troponin I (cTnI) or T (cTnT) has been reported to interfere with troponin assays. However, the extent of the interference with the measurement has not been explored sufficiently. The aims of this study were to examine the frequencies of autoantibodies against troponin I and troponin T and how much these antibodies would affect the measurement.

METHODS

The study comprised 52 subjects who visited Hokkaido University Hospital with suspected ischemic heart diseases. To evaluate the presence of autoantibodies, we calculated the recoveries of cTnI or cTnT after immunoglobulin G depletion, and the distributions of peaks reactive with cTnI or cTnT by high-performance liquid chromatography were examined.

RESULTS

Autoantibodies against cTnI and cTnT were identified in 8 subjects (15.4%) and 1 subject (1.9%), respectively. Although the greatest difference between cTnI and cTnT was 32-fold, the distributions of cTnI-to-cTnT ratios in groups with and without anti-cTnI were not statistically different.

CONCLUSION

Autoantibodies against cTnI were more frequent by several fold than those against cTnT. Their presence did not significantly expand the discrepancy between cTnI and cTnT assays.

Quantitation of cardiac troponin I in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a case-control study

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) cause a variety of toxicities, including immune-related adverse events (irAEs), but there are no biomarkers to predict their development. Guidelines recommend measuring circulating cardiac troponin I (cTnI) during ICI therapy to detect related cardiotoxicities. Moreover, elevated cTnI has also been associated with worse outcomes in non-cardiac patients, including cancer. Thus here, we investigated whether cTnI levels were higher in patients with irAEs.

METHODS

The study consisted of three groups; 21 cancer patients undergoing ICI immunotherapies who presented with irAEs, four patients without irAEs, and 20 healthy controls. Patient samples were assessed at baseline (n=25), during ICI treatment (n=25, median=6 weeks of treatment) and at toxicity (n=6, median=13 weeks of treatment). In addition to blood high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI), anti-thyroglobulin (TG) and anti-thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibodies were also quantitated to detect thyroid dysfunction, constituting the second leading toxicity (23.8%) after pneumonitis (28.6%).

RESULTS

Four patients with irAEs (n=4/21; 19%) and one without irAEs (n=1/4; 25%) showed higher hs-cTnI levels at any time-point; the remaining had physiological levels. None of these patients developed cardiotoxicity. Concurrent elevated levels of anti-thyroid antibodies and hs-cTnI were detected in one patient with thyroid dysfunction (n=1/5, 20%). However, these antibodies were also elevated in three patients (n=3/16, 19%) with non-thyroid irAEs and in up to 40% of healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

hs-cTnI was not elevated in patients with irAEs, but larger studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Not T too! False elevations in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-TnT) following specimen transport

Though false elevations attributed to preanalytical specimen handling have been widely reported for Troponin I (TnI), Troponin T (TnT) has appeared more robust to falsely elevated Tn. We describe reproducible false elevations in high sensitivity TnT (hs-TnT) in specimens after courier transport in plasma separator tubes (PST) off-site for testing. Hs-TnT was measured under 5 different conditions: 1) at collection location (N=24); 2) after transport upright in racks (N=66); 3) after transport with no control over tube agitation (N=69); 4) on transported aliquots (N=84); or 5) immediately after transport with no control over tube agitation (N=16), followed by keeping the specimen upright and re-measuring at 1hr, 2hr, 4hr, and 20-24hrs (N=6). To assess the degree of discrepancy, plasma from the original PST was aliquotted, re-centrifuged, potential debris removed, and hs-TnT re-measured. 43% of PST specimens collected offsite and transported with no control over tube agitation had clinically significant false elevations of hs-TnT which subsequently decreased following aliquotting and re-centrifugation (median decrease =9.9ng/L). Onsite testing or transported aliquots demonstrated no discrepancy. After being kept upright, discrepant specimens were not different from re-centrifuged aliquots by 4hrs (p=0.6141, repeated measures ANOVA with Dunn's multiple comparisons). Clinically significant false elevations of hs-TnT occurred in approximately 40% of separated PSTs that were transported in containers where specimens are transported with no control over tube agitation. This interference does not occur if plasma is aliquoted or if hs-TnT is tested at the collection site. In order to prevent these false elevations, and their potential patient impact on the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, specimens for hs-TnT measurement should be aliquoted at the collection location prior to transport.

Identification of macrotroponin T: findings from a case report and non-reproducible troponin T results

OBJECTIVES

Macrotroponin is due to cardiac troponin (cTn) binding to endogenous cTn autoantibodies. While previous studies showed a high incidence of macrotroponin affecting cTnI assays, reports of macrotroponin T, particularly without cTnI reactivity, have been rare. Although the clinical significance of macrotroponin is not fully understood, macroenzymes and complexes are recognised to cause confusion in interpretation of laboratory results. The potential for adverse clinical consequences due to misinterpretation of affected results is very high.

METHODS

We describe four cases of macrotroponin T with persistently low high sensitivity cTnT (hs-cTnT) by the 9 min compared to the 18 min variant of the assay. Three cases were serendipitously identified due to the use of a lot number of Roche hs-cTnT affected by non-reproducible results, necessitating measurement of cTnT in duplicate. We identified and characterised these macrotroponin specimens by immunoglobulin depletion (Protein A and PEG precipitation), mixing studies with EDTA and recombinant cTnT.

RESULTS

In cases of macro-cTnT, a lower result occurred on the hs-cTnT using the 9 min compared to 18 min variant assay (ratio of 9-18 min hs-cTnT <0.80). Mixing studies with recombinant cTnT or EDTA demonstrated a difference in recovery vs. controls. One of these patients demonstrated a high molecular weight complex for cTnI and cTnT demonstrating a macrocomplex involving both cTn. This patient demonstrated a rise and fall in cTn when measured by several commercial assays consistent with genuine acute cardiac injury.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified several cases of macro-cTnT and described associated clinical and biochemical features.

Troponin interference with special regard to macrocomplex formation

Biomarkers, such as troponin-T and troponin-I, are regarded as the gold standard laboratory parameter for diagnosing many cardiological diseases. These parameters have been approved for clinical use. Many cardiological guidelines recommend the analysis of troponins in the majority of cardiological disease diagnoses and to also gain prognostic information. Nonetheless, many medical circumstances could cause false troponin elevations. In this article, we focus on troponin artifacts, particularly macro-immune complex formation, as important interference factors. Therefore, we performed a literature search from 2006 to 06/2021.

High sensitivity troponin, analytical advantages, clinical benefits and clinical challenges - An update

The measurement of cardiac troponin (cTn) by a high sensitivity method now represents the standard method for cTn measurement in the laboratory. High sensitivity method are not measuring a novel form of troponin but have undergone methodological improvement in assay sensitivity to allow both very low level detection and repeat measurements at low levels with very low degrees of analytical imprecision. The methods identify additional patients with myocardial injury who would benefit from evidence-based interventions. Rapid predictive algorithms utilising measurement on admission as well as short sampling periods (1-2 h) allow much more rapid categorisation of patients to appropriate clinical pathways. The shift in the diagnosis from traditional "cardiac enzymes" to troponin based on the 99th percentile has accounted for the majority of the detection of myocardial injury in patients without acute coronary syndromes. These patients have a worse prognosis irrespective of the underlying cause of their hospital admission. The appropriate management strategy in this group, beyond managing the underlying problem, remains to be defined. Measurement of cTn in otherwise asymptomatic individuals may have a role for patient selection for preventive treatment or for patients monitoring. Clinical trials in this area are awaited.