McrBs, a modulator peptide for McrBC activity

Reassembling a cannon in the DNA defense arsenal: Genetics of StySA, a BREX phage exclusion system in Salmonella lab strains

Understanding mechanisms that shape horizontal exchange in prokaryotes is a key problem in biology. A major limit on DNA entry is imposed by restriction-modification (RM) processes that depend on the pattern of DNA modification at host-specified sites. In classical RM, endonucleolytic DNA cleavage follows detection of unprotected sites on entering DNA. Recent investigation has uncovered BREX (BacteRiophage EXclusion) systems. These RM-like activities employ host protection by DNA modification, but immediate replication arrest occurs without evident of nuclease action on unmodified phage DNA. Here we show that the historical stySA RM locus of Salmonella enterica sv Typhimurium is a variant BREX system. A laboratory strain disabled for both the restriction and methylation activity of StySA nevertheless has wild type sequence in pglX, the modification gene homolog. Instead, flanking genes pglZ and brxC each carry multiple mutations (μ) in their C-terminal domains. We further investigate this system in situ, replacing the mutated pglZμ and brxCμ genes with the WT counterpart. PglZ-WT supports methylation in the presence of either BrxCμ or BrxC-WT but not in the presence of a deletion/insertion allele, ΔbrxC::cat. Restriction requires both BrxC-WT and PglZ-WT, implicating the BrxC C-terminus specifically in restriction activity. These results suggests that while BrxC, PglZ and PglX are principal components of the BREX modification activity, BrxL is required for restriction only. Furthermore, we show that a partial disruption of brxL disrupts transcription globally.

Horizontal gene transfer is a major driver of evolution and adaptation in bacteria. Genes from outside may be beneficial or dangerous to the receiving cell. Benefits include new food sources such as sugars, or new homes by adhesion, or new resistances, as to antibiotics. Dangers are posed by bacteriophages--viruses that take over the cell machinery, multiply, and release progeny to kill sister cells. Host-dependent restriction-modification systems enable defense that distinguishes relatives from strangers: using a modification pattern (M) carried by DNA bases added by the host cell to prevent restriction (R). Sisters and cousin cells will have the same protective pattern on DNA, while DNA of foreign origin will have the wrong M pattern and be restricted (R, rejected). Typically, restriction involves nuclease digestion. Here we address the enigmatic StySA RM system, one of the earliest to be genetically characterized. It is a variant of the newly recognized defense mechanism, BREX. BREX systems also track DNA history via modification pattern, but restrict by a novel, uncharacterized mechanism. Like other BREX family systems, StySA-BREX modification requires multiple components. When StySA-BREX transcription is unbalanced, we find global disruption of gene transcription. The disruption pattern does not suggest SOS-inducing damage to DNA.

Hexameric assembly of the AAA+ protein McrB is necessary for GTPase activity

McrBC is one of the three modification-dependent restriction enzymes encoded by the Escherichia coli K12 chromosome. Amongst restriction enzymes, McrBC and its close homologues are unique in employing the AAA+ domain for GTP hydrolysis-dependent activation of DNA cleavage. The GTPase activity of McrB is stimulated by the endonuclease subunit McrC. It had been reported previously that McrB and McrC subunits oligomerise together into a high molecular weight species. Here we conclusively demonstrate using size exclusion chromatography coupled multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS) and images obtained by electron cryomicroscopy that McrB exists as a hexamer in solution. Furthermore, based on SEC-MALS and SAXS analyses of McrBC and the structure of McrB, we propose that McrBC is a complex of two McrB hexamers bridged by two subunits of McrC, and that the complete assembly of this complex is integral to its enzymatic activity. We show that the nucleotide-dependent oligomerisation of McrB precedes GTP hydrolysis. Mutational studies show that, unlike other AAA+ proteins, the catalytic Walker B aspartate is required for oligomerisation.

Genes within Genes in Bacterial Genomes

Genetic coding in bacteria largely operates via the "one gene-one protein" paradigm. However, the peculiarities of the mRNA structure, the versatility of the genetic code, and the dynamic nature of translation sometimes allow organisms to deviate from the standard rules of protein encoding. Bacteria can use several unorthodox modes of translation to express more than one protein from a single mRNA cistron. One such alternative path is the use of additional translation initiation sites within the gene. Proteins whose translation is initiated at different start sites within the same reading frame will differ in their N termini but will have identical C-terminal segments. On the other hand, alternative initiation of translation in a register different from the frame dictated by the primary start codon will yield a protein whose sequence is entirely different from the one encoded in the main frame. The use of internal mRNA codons as translation start sites is controlled by the nucleotide sequence and the mRNA folding. The proteins of the alternative proteome generated via the "genes-within-genes" strategy may carry important functions. In this review, we summarize the currently known examples of bacterial genes encoding more than one protein due to the utilization of additional translation start sites and discuss the known or proposed functions of the alternative polypeptides in relation to the main protein product of the gene. We also discuss recent proteome- and genome-wide approaches that will allow the discovery of novel translation initiation sites in a systematic fashion.

The other face of restriction: modification-dependent enzymes

The 1952 observation of host-induced non-hereditary variation in bacteriophages by Salvador Luria and Mary Human led to the discovery in the 1960s of modifying enzymes that glucosylate hydroxymethylcytosine in T-even phages and of genes encoding corresponding host activities that restrict non-glucosylated phage DNA: rglA and rglB (restricts glucoseless phage). In the 1980’s, appreciation of the biological scope of these activities was dramatically expanded with the demonstration that plant and animal DNA was also sensitive to restriction in cloning experiments. The rgl genes were renamed mcrA and mcrBC (modified cytosine restriction). The new class of modification-dependent restriction enzymes was named Type IV, as distinct from the familiar modification-blocked Types I–III. A third Escherichia coli enzyme, mrr (modified DNA rejection and restriction) recognizes both methylcytosine and methyladenine. In recent years, the universe of modification-dependent enzymes has expanded greatly. Technical advances allow use of Type IV enzymes to study epigenetic mechanisms in mammals and plants. Type IV enzymes recognize modified DNA with low sequence selectivity and have emerged many times independently during evolution. Here, we review biochemical and structural data on these proteins, the resurgent interest in Type IV enzymes as tools for epigenetic research and the evolutionary pressures on these systems.

Conflicts targeting epigenetic systems and their resolution by cell death: novel concepts for methyl-specific and other restriction systems

Epigenetic modification of genomic DNA by methylation is important for defining the epigenome and the transcriptome in eukaryotes as well as in prokaryotes. In prokaryotes, the DNA methyltransferase genes often vary, are mobile, and are paired with the gene for a restriction enzyme. Decrease in a certain epigenetic methylation may lead to chromosome cleavage by the partner restriction enzyme, leading to eventual cell death. Thus, the pairing of a DNA methyltransferase and a restriction enzyme forces an epigenetic state to be maintained within the genome. Although restriction enzymes were originally discovered for their ability to attack invading DNAs, it may be understood because such DNAs show deviation from this epigenetic status. DNAs with epigenetic methylation, by a methyltransferase linked or unlinked with a restriction enzyme, can also be the target of DNases, such as McrBC of Escherichia coli, which was discovered because of its methyl-specific restriction. McrBC responds to specific genome methylation systems by killing the host bacterial cell through chromosome cleavage. Evolutionary and genomic analysis of McrBC homologues revealed their mobility and wide distribution in prokaryotes similar to restriction–modification systems. These findings support the hypothesis that this family of methyl-specific DNases evolved as mobile elements competing with specific genome methylation systems through host killing. These restriction systems clearly demonstrate the presence of conflicts between epigenetic systems.

A type IV modification dependent restriction nuclease that targets glucosylated hydroxymethyl cytosine modified DNAs

The Escherichia coli CT596 prophage exclusion genes gmrS and gmrD were found to encode a novel type IV modification-dependent restriction nuclease that targets and digests glucosylated (glc)-hydroxymethylcytosine (HMC) DNAs. The protein products GmrS (36 kDa) and GmrD (27 kDa) were purified and found to be inactive separately, but together degraded several different glc-HMC modified DNAs (T4, T2 and T6). The GMR enzyme is able to degrade both alpha-glucosy-HMC T4 DNA and beta-glucosyl-HMC T4 DNA, whereas no activity was observed against non-modified DNAs including unmodified T4 cytosine (C) DNA or non-glucosylated T4 HMC DNA. Enzyme activity requires NTP, favors UTP, is stimulated by calcium, and initially produces 4 kb DNA fragments that are further degraded to low molecular mass products. The enzyme is inhibited by the T4 phage internal protein I* (IPI*) to which it was found to bind. Overall activities of the purified GmrSD enzyme are in good agreement with the properties of the cloned gmr genes in vivo and suggest a restriction enzyme specific for sugar modified HMC DNAs. IPI* thus represents a third generation bacteriophage defense against restriction nucleases of the Gmr type.

A genetic dissection of the LlaJI restriction cassette reveals insights on a novel bacteriophage resistance system

BACKGROUND

Restriction/modification systems provide the dual function of protecting host DNA against restriction by methylation of appropriate bases within their recognition sequences, and restriction of foreign invading un-methylated DNA, such as promiscuous plasmids or infecting bacteriphage. The plasmid-encoded LlaJI restriction/modification system from Lactococcus lactis recognizes an asymmetric, complementary DNA sequence, consisting of 5'GACGC'3 in one strand and 5'GCGTC'3 in the other and provides a prodigious barrier to bacteriophage infection. LlaJI is comprised of four similarly oriented genes, encoding two 5mC-MTases (M1.LlaJI and M2.LlaJI) and two subunits responsible for restriction activity (R1.LlaJI and R2.LlaJI). Here we employ a detailed genetic analysis of the LlaJI restriction determinants in an attempt to characterize mechanistic features of this unusual hetero-oligomeric endonuclease.

RESULTS

Detailed bioinformatics analysis confirmed the presence of a conserved GTP binding and hydrolysis domain within the C-terminal half of the R1.LlaJI amino acid sequence whilst the N-terminal half appeared to be entirely unique. This domain architecture was homologous with that of the "B" subunit of the GTP-dependent, methyl-specific McrBC endonuclease from E.coli K-12. R1.LlaJI did not appear to contain a catalytic centre, whereas this conserved motif; PD....D/EXK, was clearly identified within the amino acid sequence for R2.LlaJI. Both R1.LlaJI and R2.LlaJI were found to be absolutely required for detectable LlaJI activity in vivo. The LlaJI restriction subunits were purified and examined in vitro, which allowed the assignment of R1.LlaJI as the sole specificity determining subunit, whilst R2.LlaJI is believed to mediate DNA cleavage.

CONCLUSION

The hetero-subunit structure of LlaJI, wherein one subunit mediates DNA binding whilst the other subunit is predicted to catalyze strand hydrolysis distinguishes LlaJI from previously characterized restriction-modification systems. Furthermore, this distinction is accentuated by the fact that whilst LlaJI behaves as a conventional Type IIA system in vivo, in that it restricts un-methylated DNA, it resembles the Type IV McrBC endonuclease, an enzyme specific for methylated DNA. A number of similar restriction determinants were identified in the database and it is likely LlaJI together with these homologous systems, comprise a new subtype of the Type II class incorporating features of Type II and Type IV systems.

A genetic dissection of the LlaJI restriction cassette reveals insights on a novel bacteriophage resistance system

BACKGROUND

Restriction/modification systems provide the dual function of protecting host DNA against restriction by methylation of appropriate bases within their recognition sequences, and restriction of foreign invading un-methylated DNA, such as promiscuous plasmids or infecting bacteriphage. The plasmid-encoded LlaJI restriction/modification system from Lactococcus lactis recognizes an asymmetric, complementary DNA sequence, consisting of 5'GACGC'3 in one strand and 5'GCGTC'3 in the other and provides a prodigious barrier to bacteriophage infection. LlaJI is comprised of four similarly oriented genes, encoding two 5mC-MTases (M1.LlaJI and M2.LlaJI) and two subunits responsible for restriction activity (R1.LlaJI and R2.LlaJI). Here we employ a detailed genetic analysis of the LlaJI restriction determinants in an attempt to characterize mechanistic features of this unusual hetero-oligomeric endonuclease.

RESULTS

Detailed bioinformatics analysis confirmed the presence of a conserved GTP binding and hydrolysis domain within the C-terminal half of the R1.LlaJI amino acid sequence whilst the N-terminal half appeared to be entirely unique. This domain architecture was homologous with that of the "B" subunit of the GTP-dependent, methyl-specific McrBC endonuclease from E.coli K-12. R1.LlaJI did not appear to contain a catalytic centre, whereas this conserved motif; PD....D/EXK, was clearly identified within the amino acid sequence for R2.LlaJI. Both R1.LlaJI and R2.LlaJI were found to be absolutely required for detectable LlaJI activity in vivo. The LlaJI restriction subunits were purified and examined in vitro, which allowed the assignment of R1.LlaJI as the sole specificity determining subunit, whilst R2.LlaJI is believed to mediate DNA cleavage.

CONCLUSION

The hetero-subunit structure of LlaJI, wherein one subunit mediates DNA binding whilst the other subunit is predicted to catalyze strand hydrolysis distinguishes LlaJI from previously characterized restriction-modification systems. Furthermore, this distinction is accentuated by the fact that whilst LlaJI behaves as a conventional Type IIA system in vivo, in that it restricts un-methylated DNA, it resembles the Type IV McrBC endonuclease, an enzyme specific for methylated DNA. A number of similar restriction determinants were identified in the database and it is likely LlaJI together with these homologous systems, comprise a new subtype of the Type II class incorporating features of Type II and Type IV systems.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Est3p dimerizes in vitro and dimerization contributes to efficient telomere replication in vivo

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae at least five genes, EST1, EST2, EST3, TLC1 and CDC13, are required for telomerase activity in vivo. The telomerase catalytic subunit Est2p and telomerase RNA subunit Tlc1 constitute the telomerase core enzyme. Est1p and Est3p are the other subunits of telomerase holoenzyme. In order to dissect the function of Est3p in telomere replication, we over-expressed and purified recombinant wild-type and mutant Est3 proteins. The wild-type protein, as well as the K71A, E104A and T115A mutants were able to dimerize in vitro, while the Est3p-D49A, -K68A or -D166A mutant showed reduced ability to dimerize. Mutations in Est3p that decreased dimerization also appeared to cause telomere shortening in vivo. Double point mutation of Est3p-D49A-K68A and single point mutation of Est3p-K68A showed similar telomere shortening, suggesting that the K68 residue might be more important for telomerase activity. The ectopic co-expression of K71A or T115A mutant with wild-type Est3p using centromere plasmids caused telomere shortening, while co-expression of the D49A, K68A, D86A or F103A mutants with wild-type Est3p had no effect on telomere length regulation. These data suggested that dimerization is important for Est3p function in vivo.

Maintenance of species identity and controlling speciation of bacteria: a new function for restriction/modification systems?

Bacteria frequently exchange DNA among each other by horizontal gene transfer. However, maintenance of species identity and in particular speciation requires a certain barrier against an unregulated uptake of foreign DNA. Here it is suggested that formation of such a barrier is one important biological function of restriction/modification systems, in addition to the classical function of protection of bacteria against bacteriophage infection. This model explains the extreme variability and wide distribution of restriction/modification systems among prokaryotes, the prevalence of RM-systems in pathogenic bacteria and the existence of several RM-systems in single bacterial strains.

Complex restriction enzymes: NTP-driven molecular motors

Survival is assuredly the prime directive for all living organisms either as individuals or as a species. One of the main challenges encountered by bacterial populations is the danger of bacteriophage attacks, since infection of a single bacterium may rapidly propagate, decimating the entire population. In order to protect themselves against this acute threat, bacteria have developed an array of defence mechanisms, which range from preventing the infection itself via interference with bacteriophage adsorption to the cell surface and prevention of phage DNA injection, to degradation of the injected phage DNA. This last defence mechanism is catalysed by the bacterial restriction-modification (R-M) systems, and in particular, by nucleoside 5'-triphosphate (NTP)-dependent restriction enzymes, e.g. type I and type III R-M systems or the modification-dependent endonucleases. Type I and type III restriction systems have dual properties. They may either act as methylases and protect the host's own DNA against restriction by methylating specific residues, or they catalyse ATP-dependent endonuclease activity so that invading foreign DNA lacking the host-specific methylation is degraded. These defence mechanism systems are further complemented by the presence of methylation-dependent, GTP-dependent endonucleases, that restricts specifically methylated DNA. Although all three types of endonucleases are structurally very different, they share a common functional mechanism. They recognise and bind to specific DNA sequences but do not cleave DNA within those target sites. They belong to the general class of DNA motor proteins, which use the free energy associated with nucleoside 5'-triphosphate hydrolysis to translocate DNA so that the subsequent DNA cleavage event occurs at a distance from the endonuclease recognition site. Moreover, DNA cleavage appears to be a random process triggered upon stalling of the DNA translocation process and requiring dimerisation of the bound endonucleases for a concerted break of both DNA strands. In this review, we present a detailed description and analysis of the functional mechanism of the three known NTP-dependent restriction systems: type I and type III restriction-modification enzymes, as well as the methylation-dependent McrBC endonuclease.

A mutational analysis of the PD...D/EXK motif suggests that McrC harbors the catalytic center for DNA cleavage by the GTP-dependent restriction enzyme McrBC from Escherichia coli

McrBC is a unique restriction enzyme which binds specifically to the bipartite recognition sequence R(m)CN( approximately )(30)(-)( approximately )(2000)R(m)C and in the presence of GTP translocates the DNA and cleaves both strands at multiple positions within the two R(m)C "half-sites". It is known that McrBC is composed of two subunits: McrB which binds and hydrolyzes GTP and specifically interacts with DNA and McrC whose function is not clear but which has been suspected to harbor the catalytic center for DNA cleavage. A multiple-sequence alignment of the amino acid sequence of Escherichia coli McrC and of six presumably homologous open reading frames from various bacterial species shows that a sequence motif found in many restriction enzymes, but also in other nucleases, the PD.D/EXK motif, is conserved among these sequences. A mutational analysis, in which the carboxylates (aspartic acid in McrC) of this motif were substituted with alanine or asparagine and lysine was substituted with alanine or arginine, strongly suggests that Asp244, Asp257, and Lys259 represent the catalytic center of E. coli McrC. Whereas the variants D244A (or -N), D257A (or -N), and K259A are inactive in DNA cleavage (K259R has residual DNA cleavage activity), they interact with McrB like wild-type McrC, as can be deduced from the finding that they stimulate the McrB-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis to the same extent as wild-type McrC. Thus, whereas McrC variants defective in DNA cleavage can stimulate the GTPase activity of McrB, the DNase activity of McrC is not supported by McrB variants defective in GTP hydrolysis.

Nucleoside triphosphate-dependent restriction enzymes

The known nucleoside triphosphate-dependent restriction enzymes are hetero-oligomeric proteins that behave as molecular machines in response to their target sequences. They translocate DNA in a process dependent on the hydrolysis of a nucleoside triphosphate. For the ATP-dependent type I and type III restriction and modification systems, the collision of translocating complexes triggers hydrolysis of phosphodiester bonds in unmodified DNA to generate double-strand breaks. Type I endonucleases break the DNA at unspecified sequences remote from the target sequence, type III endonucleases at a fixed position close to the target sequence. Type I and type III restriction and modification (R-M) systems are notable for effective post-translational control of their endonuclease activity. For some type I enzymes, this control is mediated by proteolytic degradation of that subunit of the complex which is essential for DNA translocation and breakage. This control, lacking in the well-studied type II R-M systems, provides extraordinarily effective protection of resident DNA should it acquire unmodified target sequences. The only well-documented GTP-dependent restriction enzyme, McrBC, requires methylated target sequences for the initiation of phosphodiester bond cleavage.

The McrBC restriction endonuclease assembles into a ring structure in the presence of G nucleotides

McrBC from Escherichia coli K-12 is a restriction enzyme that belongs to the family of AAA(+) proteins and cuts DNA containing modified cytosines. Two proteins are expressed from the mcrB gene: a full-length version, McrB(L), and a short version, McrB(S). McrB(L) binds specifically to the methylated recognition site and is, therefore, the DNA-binding moiety of the McrBC endonuclease. McrB(S) is devoid of DNA-binding activity. We observed that the quaternary structure of the endonuclease depends on binding of the cofactors. In gel filtration experiments, McrB(L) and McrB(S) form high molecular weight oligomers in the presence of Mg(2+) and GTP, GDP or GTP-gamma-S. Oligomerization did not require the presence of DNA and was independent of GTP hydrolysis. Electron micrographs of negatively stained McrB(L) and McrB(S) revealed ring-shaped particles with a central channel. Mass analysis by scanning transmission electron microscopy indicates that McrB(L) and McrB(S) form single heptameric rings as well as tetradecamers. In the presence of McrC, a subunit that is essential for DNA cleavage, the tetradecameric species was the major form of the endonuclease.

Interim report on genomics of Escherichia coli

We present a summary of recent progress in understanding Escherichia coli K-12 gene and protein functions. New information has come both from classical biological experimentation and from using the analytical tools of functional genomics. The content of the E. coli genome can clearly be seen to contain elements acquired by horizontal transfer. Nevertheless, there is probably a large, stable core of >3500 genes that are shared among all E. coli strains. The gene-enzyme relationship is examined, and, in many cases, it exhibits complexity beyond a simple one-to-one relationship. Also, the E. coli genome can now be seen to contain many multiple enzymes that carry out the same or closely similar reactions. Some are similar in sequence and may share common ancestry; some are not. We discuss the concept of a minimal genome as being variable among organisms and obligatorily linked to their life styles and defined environmental conditions. We also address classification of functions of gene products and avenues of insight into the history of protein evolution.

Methyl-specific DNA binding by McrBC, a modification-dependent restriction enzyme

McrBC, a GTP-requiring, modification-dependent endonuclease of Escherichia coli K-12, specifically recognizes DNA sites of the form 5' R(m)C 3'. DNA cleavage normally requires translocation-mediated coordination between two such recognition elements at distinct sites. We have investigated assembly of the cleavage-competent complex with gel-shift and DNase I footprint analysis. In the gel-shift system, McrB(L) binding resulted in a fast-migrating specific shifted band, in a manner requiring both GTP and Mg(2+). The binding was specific for methylated DNA and responded to local sequence changes in the same way that cleavage does. Single-stranded DNA competed for McrB(L)-binding in a modification and sequence-specific fashion. A supershifted species was formed in the presence of McrC and GTPgammaS. DNase I footprint analysis showed modest cooperativity in binding to two sites, and a two-site substrate displayed protection in non-specific spacer DNA in addition to the recognition elements. The addition of McrC did not affect the footprint obtained. We propose that McrC effects a conformational change in the complex rather than a reorganization of the DNA:protein interface.

ATP-dependent restriction enzymes

The phenomenon of restriction and modification (R-M) was first observed in the course of studies on bacteriophages in the early 1950s. It was only in the 1960s that work of Arber and colleagues provided a molecular explanation for the host specificity. DNA restriction and modification enzymes are responsible for the host-specific barriers to interstrain and interspecies transfer of genetic information that have been observed in a variety of bacterial cell types. R-M systems comprise an endonuclease and a methyltransferase activity. They serve to protect bacterial cells against bacteriophage infection, because incoming foreign DNA is specifically cleaved by the restriction enzyme if it contains the recognition sequence of the endonuclease. The DNA is protected from cleavage by a specific methylation within the recognition sequence, which is introduced by the methyltransferase. Classic R-M systems are now divided into three types on the basis of enzyme complexity, cofactor requirements, and position of DNA cleavage, although new systems are being discovered that do not fit readily into this classification. This review concentrates on multisubunit, multifunctional ATP-dependent restriction enzymes. A growing number of these enzymes are being subjected to biochemical and genetic studies that, when combined with ongoing structural analyses, promise to provide detailed models for mechanisms of DNA recognition and catalysis. It is now clear that DNA cleavage by these enzymes involves highly unusual modes of interaction between the enzymes and their substrates. These unique features of mechanism pose exciting questions and in addition have led to the suggestion that these enzymes may have biological functions beyond that of restriction and modification. The purpose of this review is to describe the exciting developments in our understanding of how the ATP-dependent restriction enzymes recognize specific DNA sequences and cleave or modify DNA.

Defining the location and function of domains of McrB by deletion mutagenesis

The GTP-dependent restriction endonuclease McrBC of E. coli K12, which recognizes cytosine-methylated DNA, consists of two protein subunits, McrB and McrC. We have investigated the structural assignment and interdependence of the McrB subunit functions, namely (i) specific DNA recognition and (ii) GTP binding and hydrolysis. Extending earlier work, we have produced McrB variants comprising N- and C-terminal fragments. The variants McrB1-162 and McrB1-170 are still capable of specific DNA binding. McrB169-465 shows GTP binding and hydrolysis characteristics indistinguishable from full-length McrB as well as wild-type like interaction with McrC. Thus, DNA and GTP binding are spatially separated on the McrB molecule, and the respective domains function quite independently.

The GTP-binding domain of McrB: more than just a variation on a common theme?

The methylation-dependent restriction endonuclease McrBC from Escherichia coli K12 cleaves DNA containing two R(m)C dinucleotides separated by about 40 to 2000 base-pairs. McrBC is unique in that cleavage is totally dependent on GTP hydrolysis. McrB is the GTP binding and hydrolyzing subunit, whereas MrC stimulates its GTP hydrolysis. The C-terminal part of McrB contains the sequences characteristic for GTP-binding proteins, consisting of the GxxxxGK(S/T) motif (position 201-208), followed by the DxxG motif (position 300-303). The third motif (NKxD) is present only in a non-canonical form (NTAD 333-336). Here we report a mutational analysis of the putative GTP-binding domain of McrB. Amino acid substitutions were initially performed in the three proposed GTP-binding motifs. Whereas substitutions in motif 1 (P203V) and 2 (D300N) show the expected, albeit modest effects, mutation in the motif 3 is at variance with the expectations. Unlike the corresponding EF-Tu and ras -p21 variants, the D336N mutation in McrB does not change the nucleotide specificity from GTP to XTP, but results in a lack of GTPase stimulation by McrC. The finding that McrB is not a typical G protein motivated us to perform a search for similar sequences in DNA databases. Eight microbial sequences were found, mainly from unfinished sequencing projects, with highly conserved sequence blocks within a presumptive GTP-binding domain. From the five sequences showing the highest homology, 17 invariant charged or polar residues outside the classical three GTP-binding motifs were identified and subsequently exchanged to alanine. Several mutations specifically affect GTP affinity and/or GTPase activity. Our data allow us to conclude that McrB is not a typical member of the superfamily of GTP-binding proteins, but defines a new subfamily within the superfamily of GTP-binding proteins, together with similar prokaryotic proteins of as yet unidentified function.

The McrBC endonuclease translocates DNA in a reaction dependent on GTP hydrolysis

McrBC specifically recognizes and cleaves methylated DNA in a reaction dependent on GTP hydrolysis. DNA cleavage requires at least two recognition sites that are optimally separated by 40-80 bp, but can be spaced as far as 3 kb apart. The nature of the communication between two recognition sites was analyzed on DNA substrates containing one or two recognition sites. DNA cleavage of circular DNA required only one methylated recognition site, whereas the linearized form of this substrate was not cleaved. However, the linearized substrate was cleaved if a Lac repressor was bound adjacent to the recognition site. These results suggest a model in which communication between two remote sites is accomplished by DNA translocation rather than looping. A mutant protein with defective GTPase activity cleaved substrates with closely spaced recognition sites, but not substrates where the sites were further apart. This indicates that McrBC translocates DNA in a reaction dependent on GTP hydrolysis. We suggest that DNA cleavage occurs by the encounter of two DNA-translocating McrBC complexes, or can be triggered by non-specific physical obstacles like the Lac repressor bound on the enzyme's path along DNA. Our results indicate that McrBC belongs to the general class of DNA "motor proteins", which use the free energy associated with nucleoside 5'-triphosphate hydrolysis to translocate along DNA.