Proposed Standardized Neurological Endpoints for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: An Academic Research Consortium Initiative

Efficacy and safety of clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy in patients at high risk of subsequent cardiovascular event after percutaneous coronary intervention (SMART-CHOICE 3): a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy for long-term antiplatelet maintenance for patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy in patients who completed a standard duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following PCI with drug-eluting stents.

METHODS

In this multicentre, randomised, open-label trial, patients aged 19 years or older at high risk of recurrent ischaemic events (previous myocardial infarction at any time before enrolment, medication-treated diabetes, or complex coronary lesions) who completed a standard duration of DAPT after PCI were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive clopidogrel (75 mg once a day) or aspirin (100 mg once a day) oral monotherapy at 26 sites in South Korea. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Adverse events were captured as part of the secondary endpoints. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04418479). It is closed to accrual and extended follow-up is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 10, 2020, and July 31, 2023, 5542 patients were assessed for eligibility and 5506 were randomly assigned (2752 to clopidogrel monotherapy and 2754 to aspirin monotherapy). The median time between PCI and randomisation was 17·5 months (IQR 12·6-36·1 months). During a median follow-up period of 2·3 years (IQR 1·6-3·0), the primary endpoint occurred in 92 patients in the clopidogrel group and 128 patients in the aspirin group (Kaplan-Meier estimated 3-year incidence 4·4% [95% CI 3·4-5·4] vs 6·6% [5·4-7·8]; hazard ratio 0·71 [95% CI 0·54-0·93]; p=0·013). Death from any cause occurred in 50 patients in the clopidogrel group and 70 in the aspirin group (2·4% [1·6-3·1] vs 4·0% [2·9-5·0] at 3 years; 0·71 [0·49-1·02]); myocardial infarction in 23 patients in the clopidogrel group and 42 in the aspirin group (1·0% [0·6-1·4] vs 2·2% [1·4-2·9] at 3 years; 0·54 [0·33-0·90]); and stroke in 23 in the clopidogrel group and 29 in the aspirin group (1·3% [0·7-2·0] vs 1·3% [0·8-1·7] at 3 years; 0·79 [0·46-1·36]). There was no difference in the risk of bleeding between the clopidogrel and aspirin groups (3·0% [2·0-3·9] vs 3·0% [2·2-3·9] at 3 years; 0·97 [0·67-1·42]). Clopidogrel was not associated with a higher incidence of any adverse event compared with aspirin.

INTERPRETATION

Among patients who were at high risk of recurrent ischaemic events and who completed the standard duration of DAPT following PCI, clopidogrel monotherapy, compared with aspirin monotherapy, significantly reduced the cumulative incidence of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, and stroke, without an apparent increase in the risk of bleeding.

FUNDING

Dong-A ST.

Connecting the dots: A narrative review of the relationship between heart failure and cognitive impairment

Large clinical data underscore that heart failure is independently associated to an increased risk of negative cognitive outcome and dementia. Emerging evidence suggests that cerebral hypoperfusion, stemming from reduced cardiac output and vascular pathology, may contribute to the largely overlapping vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Despite these insights, cognitive outcomes remain largely overlooked in heart failure management. This narrative review outlines the prevalence and risk of cognitive impairment in heart failure patients, exploring potential shared pathophysiological mechanisms and examining the impact of heart failure therapy on cognitive deficits. Additionally, it discusses clinical implications and suggests future treatment approaches targeting therapeutic outcomes. Cognitive impairment is prevalent among individuals with heart failure, with reported rates varying widely depending on assessment methods. Shared pathological pathways and risk factors, including atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertension, obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, suggest a causal link. Mechanisms such as poor perfusion, microembolic events, ischaemic syndromes and cerebral inflammation contribute to this relationship. Moreover, heart failure itself may exacerbate cognitive dysfunction. This emerging understanding posits that vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease may represent a pathophysiological continuum, driven by both the accumulation of misfolded proteins and cerebrovascular pathology due to cardiovascular dysfunction. Understanding these links is crucial for developing effective treatment strategies. The complex interplay between heart failure and cognitive impairment underscores the necessity for a holistic patient care approach. Both conditions share analogous disease processes, influencing self-management and independence in patients. Prioritizing brain health in heart failure management is essential to enhance patient prognosis and general well-being.

[Advances in stroke after transcatheter aortic valve replacement]

With the clinical generalization and popularization of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), cerebrovascular events related to TAVR occur more frequently, which significantly impairs neurocognitive function, increases mortality, and seriously affects prognosis and quality of life in these patients. However, the reported incidence rates of TAVR-related stroke differ in literature due to inconsistent diagnostic criteria. According to the onset time, TAVR-related stroke can be divided into acute (≤24 h), subacute (24 h-30 d), early (31 d-1 year) and late (>1 year) types, and the cause of stroke generally varies according to the onset time. Both surgical (balloon aortic valvuloplasty, types of transcatheter heart valve, alternative access) and non-surgical (valvular calcium burden, bicuspid aortic valve, subclinical leaflet thrombosis, postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation) can be related to the occurrence of TAVR-related stroke. Postprocedural monitoring, postprocedural antithrombotic therapy, and cerebral embolic protection devices are important for the prevention of TAVR-related stoke. This article reviews the research progress on TAVR-related stroke, focusing on its epidemiology, risk factors and preventive measures, aiming to provide reference for the clinical management of stroke in TAVR.

Association Between Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy and Stroke After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

OBJECTIVE

The link between bovine aortic arch (BAA) and stroke after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was investigated.

METHODS

The multicenter retrospective study included consecutive Stanford type B aortic dissection patients undergoing TEVAR from January 2019 to December 2023. A multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess the correlation between BAA and early stroke, while a multivariable Cox regression was employed to evaluate the association between BAA and overall stroke. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the freedom from overall stroke rates.

RESULTS

In total, 138 (14.3%) had a BAA and 825 (85.7%) had a standard aortic arch (SAA). Patients with a BAA showed a greater early stroke incidence (11 [8.0%] vs 25 [3.0%]; p=0.005). An independent association was found between BAA and early stroke (odds ratio, 2.009 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.491-2.684]; p=0.012). During follow-up, a greater incidence of overall stroke was seen in patients with a BAA (15 [10.9%] vs 42 [5.1%]) (hazard ratio, 2.310 [95% CI, 1.889-2.950]; p=0.006). Moreover, the freedom from the overall stroke rate was notably lower in the BAA group (80.42% vs 88.74%) (log-rank p=0.0068). Furthermore, patients with type A BAA showed significantly lower freedom from overall stroke rates (79.48%) relative to those with type B BAA (82.09%) (log-rank p=0.0431), and the freedom from overall stroke rate for patients with BAA ≥60 years was markedly lower (63.35%) than that in those <60 years (93.51%) (log-rank p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

BAA was correlated with an increased risk of early and overall stroke following TEVAR, particularly among older and type A BAA patients.Clinical ImpactIndividualized stroke prevention protocols and efficient neuroprotective measures should be developed for patients with BAA and adequate anticoagulation should be ensured to reduce the risk of embolism during TEVAR. This population should also ensure proper needle alignment. For instance, minimize the contact between the guide wire and the aortic arch wall. Temporal-occlusion of the carotid dynamic pulse during stent release might prevent solid fragments from entering into the craniocerebral artery. Additionally, thorough CO2 or saline flushing technique can be utilized for all the stentgrafts. Furthermore, distal cerebral embolic protection devices should be conducted in patients with a BAA during TEVAR.

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction - A Single-Center Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment strategy for patients with coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) remains unclear. This study investigated the long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and medical therapy (MT) in this specific patient cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective cohort study included 987 consecutive patients with CTO and LVSD who met the inclusion criteria and underwent either CTO-PCI (n=277), CTO-CABG (n=222), or CTO-MT (n=488) between 2014 and 2020. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality during follow-up. Secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and their components, including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, unplanned revascularization, and hospitalization for heart failure. During a median follow-up of 5.3 years, 232 (23.51%) patients died from any cause. In the unadjusted analysis, CTO-MT was associated with worse long-term survival prospects. After inverse probability of treatment weighting and variable adjustment, CTO-PCI and CTO-CABG demonstrated significant reductions in the long-term risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Notably, CTO-CABG was associated with the lowest long-term risks of MACCE, MI, unplanned revascularization, and hospitalization for heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with CTO and LVSD, successful CTO revascularization significantly improved long-term survival compared with CTO-MT. CTO-CABG can be regarded as the optimal treatment modality for better long-term prognosis.

Endovascular Repair of Penetrating Thoracic Aortic Ulcers Using Tubular Stent Grafts Versus Stent Grafts With a Proximal Scallop

PURPOSE

In penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs), limited data support tubular thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) as a viable treatment option. For treatment of more proximal PAUs, hybrid approaches and-more recently-scalloped TEVAR (scTEVAR) have been advocated. Outcomes of scTEVAR specifically for PAUs have not yet been reported. This study reports long-term outcomes for tubular and scTEVAR in PAUs and compares the safety profile in both cohorts regarding the significantly more proximal landing zone (LZ) for scTEVAR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study includes all nonacute patients treated for complicated PAU with scTEVAR and tubular TEVAR. Patient and PAU characteristics as well as procedural success, complication and reintervention rates, and all-cause and aortic mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 212 TEVAR procedures reviewed, 21 patients with tubular TEVAR and 19 patients with scTEVAR were included. Patient and PAU characteristics were similar, and LZ was significantly more proximal in the scTEVAR cohort (p=0.0001), with similar number and types of supra-aortic revascularization procedures. Clinical success was reached in all 40 patients (100%), and reintervention rate was 2/21 (9.5%) and 1/19 (5.3%), respectively. Over the mean follow-up of 63 (TEVAR) and 53 (scTEVAR) months, clinical success was stable in all patients with one (abdominal) aortic-related mortality in the scTEVAR cohort.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of complicated PAUs with TEVAR as well as scTEVAR provides excellent and similar clinical success, stability of clinical success, and aortic survival with acceptable complication and reintervention rates. Scalloped TEVAR safely lengthens the proximal sealing zone to address more proximal pathologies.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Treatment of asymptomatic complicated penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) provides excellent clinical success and acceptable complication and reintervention rates. More patients become amenable to endovascular treatment by including scalloped TEVAR (scTEVAR) as a means to safely lengthen the proximal sealing zone to address more proximal pathologies.

Cost-effectiveness of MLC601 in post-stroke functional recovery compared with placebo - the CHIMES & CHIMES-E studies

BACKGROUND

Despite progress in stroke therapy (e.g., revascularisation interventions by thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy, organised stroke care), many stroke survivors will have impairment of neurological function. We aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of an oral natural formulation, MLC601, versus placebo in functional recovery among subjects receiving standard of care after an ischemic stroke of intermediate severity assessed with NIH Stroke Scale at baseline (b-NIHSS 8-14).

METHODS

A Markov cohort model with a 2-year time horizon was developed to simulate patients from a published randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial of MLC601 in their post-stroke functional recovery assessed by modified Rankin Score (mRS), from a health system perspective. Transition probabilities were derived from a multi-centre clinical trial in South East Asia. As cost and utility data were not collected in the trial, therefore we extracted them from the published literature. The main outcomes were incremental cost, incremental quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Besides base-case and sensitivity analyses, we performed subgroup analyses to explore the heterogeneity of patients with poor-prognosis factors (b-NIHSS 10-14, stroke onset to treatment time > 48 h, rehabilitation during first 3 month). All costs are expressed in 2022 Euro and USD, with an annual discount rate of 3% applied to costs and QALYs.

RESULTS

Base-case analysis showed that MLC601 was cost-effective compared with placebo, with €5,080 saved and 0.45 QALY gained, resulting in an ICER of -€11,352.50 per QALY gained. Similarly, results from subgroup analyses indicated that the use of MLC601 was a dominant strategy in all subgroups with poor-prognosis factors. Sensitivity analyses revealed the results were robust.

CONCLUSION

Compared with placebo on top of standard stroke care, MLC601 was cost-effective in post-stroke functional recovery over two years. Due to the lack of cost and utility data from the study population, the results might not be generalizable to other settings. Further studies with country-specific data are needed to confirm the results of this study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov . Unique identifier NCT00554723 November 7, 2007.

Balloon-Expandable vs Self-Expanding Valves for Transcatheter Treatment of Sievers Type 1 Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) and self-expanding valves (SEVs) have different features that may impact the outcomes of patients with Sievers type 1 bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare procedural and clinical outcomes of BEVs and SEVs in Sievers type 1 BAV stenosis.

METHODS

AD-HOC (Characteristics, Sizing, and Outcomes of Stenotic Raphe-Type Bicuspid Aortic Valves Treated With Transcatheter Device Implantation) is an observational registry enrolling patients with Sievers type 1 BAV stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with current-generation BEVs and SEVs at 24 international centers. A 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust for baseline imbalances. The primary endpoint was midterm major adverse events, defined as a composite of all-cause death, neurologic events, or hospitalization for heart failure.

RESULTS

Among 955 eligible patients, propensity score matching resulted in 301 pairs. At a median follow-up of 1.3 years, BEVs and SEVs had a similar risk of major adverse events (BEV vs SEV: HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.49-1.16; P = 0.200). Technical success was similar (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 0.63-3.04; P = 0.421). At 30 days, BEVs were associated with a lower risk of new permanent pacemaker implantation (OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.24-0.72; P = 0.002) and moderate or greater paravalvular regurgitation (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.05-0.48; P = 0.001) but a higher risk of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (OR: 3.03; 95% CI 1.02-8.95; P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Current-generation BEVs and SEVs proved similar technical success and midterm clinical efficacy in Sievers type 1 BAV stenosis. Compared to SEVs, BEVs were associated with less permanent pacemaker implantation and moderate or greater paravalvular regurgitation but with more severe patient-prosthesis mismatch.

Incidence, Predictors, and Prognostic Impact of Neurologic Events After TAVR According to VARC-3 Criteria

BACKGROUND

The Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 definition for neurologic events after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) lacks clinical validation.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of neurologic events following TAVR as defined by VARC-3 criteria.

METHODS

This was a multicenter study including 2,924 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR. Based on Neurologic Academic Research Consortium (NeuroARC) classification, neurologic events were classified as NeuroARC type 1 (stroke), NeuroARC type 2 (covert central nervous system injury), and NeuroARC type 3 (transient ischemic attack and delirium). Baseline, procedural, and follow-up data were prospectively collected in a dedicated database.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 13 (7-37) months, neurologic events occurred in 471 patients (16.1%), NeuroARC type 1, 2, and 3 in 37.4%, 4.7%, and 58.0% of cases, respectively, and the majority (58.6%) were periprocedural. Advanced age, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, major vascular complications, and in-hospital bleeding determined an increased risk of periprocedural events (P < 0.03 for all). Neurologic events occurring during the periprocedural time frame were independently associated with a substantial increase in mortality at 1 year after the intervention (HR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.23-2.97; P = 0.004). However, although NeuroARC type 1 was associated with an increased mortality risk (IRR: 3.38; 95% CI: 2.30-5.56; P < 0.001 and IRR: 21.7; 95% CI: 9.63-49.1; P < 0.001 for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, respectively), the occurrence of NeuroARC type 3 events had no impact on mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurologic events after TAVR were associated with poorer short- and long-term survival. This correlation was related to the type of NeuroARC event defined by the VARC-3 criteria. Given the negative impact on clinical outcomes, every attempt should be made to reduce the risk of neurologic complications after TAVR.

Effect of menopausal hormonal therapy on cardiovascular risks in Korean postmenopausal women: A nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), according to various regimens, dosages, routes of administration and starting ages of MHT.

DESIGN

A population-based cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance Services database.

SETTING

Nationwide health insurance database.

POPULATION

Women who reported entering menopause at an age of ≥40 years with no history of CVD in the national health examination.

METHODS

The study population comprised 1 120 705 subjects enrolled between 2002 and 2019, categorised according to MHT status (MHT group, n = 319 007; non-MHT group, n = 801 698).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of CVD (a composite of myocardial infarction and stroke).

RESULTS

The incidence of CVD was 59 266 (7.4%) in the non-MHT group and 17 674 (5.5%) in the MHT group. After adjusting for confounding factors, an increased risk of CVD was observed with the administration of tibolone (hazard ratio, HR 1.143, 95% CI 1.117-1.170), oral estrogen (HR 1.246, 95% CI 1.198-1.295) or transdermal estrogen (HR 1.289, 95% CI 1.066-1.558), compared with the non-MHT group; the risk was based on an increased risk of stroke. The risk trends were consistent regardless of the age of starting MHT or the physicians' specialty. Among tibolone users, a longer period from entering menopause to taking tibolone and the use of any dosage (1.25 or 2.5 mg) were linked with a higher risk of CVD, compared with non-MHT users.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide cohort study demonstrated an increased risk of CVD, driven mainly by an increased risk of stroke, among tibolone and oral or transdermal estrogen users, compared with that of non-MHT users.

Drug-coated balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stenting for the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions: REC-CAGEFREE I trial rationale and design

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with primary stenting, which stands for stent implantation regardless of obtaining satisfactory results with balloon angioplasty, has superseded conventional plain old balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting. With drug-coated balloon (DCB), primary DCB angioplasty with provisional stenting has shown non-inferiority to primary stenting for de novo coronary small vessel disease. However, the long-term efficacy and safety of such a strategy to the primary stenting on clinical endpoints in de novo lesions without vessel diameter restrictions remain uncertain.

STUDY DESIGN

The REC-CAGEFREE I is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial aimed to enroll 2270 patients with acute or chronic coronary syndrome from 43 interventional cardiology centers in China to evaluate the non-inferiority of primary paclitaxel-coated balloons angioplasty to primary stenting for the treatment of de novo, non-complex lesions without vessel diameter restrictions. Patients who fulfill all the inclusion and exclusion criteria and have achieved a successful lesion pre-dilatation will be randomly assigned to the two arms in a 1:1 ratio. Protocol-guided DCB angioplasty and bailout stenting after unsatisfactory angioplasty are mandatory in the primary DCB angioplasty group. The second-generation sirolimus-eluting stent will be used as a bailout stent in the primary DCB angioplasty group and the treatment device in the primary stenting group. The primary endpoint is the incidence of Device-oriented Composite Endpoint (DoCE) within 24 months after randomization, including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically and physiologically indicated target lesion revascularization.

DISCUSSION

The ongoing REC-CAGEFREE I trial is the first randomized trial with a clinical endpoint to assess the efficacy and safety of primary DCB angioplasty for the treatment of de novo, non-complex lesions without vessel diameter restrictions. If non-inferiority is shown, PCI with primary DCB angioplasty could be an alternative treatment option to primary stenting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered on clinicaltrial.gov (NCT04561739).

Impact of Duration of Diabetes Mellitus on Long-Term Outcome in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention after the First Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The impact of the diabetes duration on the long-term outcome of those with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after the first AMI is unclear. In this study, we evaluated the predictive value of diabetes duration in the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs).

METHODS

A total of 394 type 2 DM patients with PCI after the first AMI were enrolled and were divided into two groups by the diabetes duration: a short-DM group with diabetes duration of <5 years and a long-DM group with a duration of ≥5 years. The clinical endpoint was MACCEs.

RESULTS

Multivariate Cox regression analysis found that the diabetes duration was independently associated with increased occurrence of MACCEs (HR: 1.512, 95% CI: 1.033, 2.215, p = 0.034), along with hypertension, Killip class III or IV, creatinine, multivessel disease, and continuous hypoglycemic therapy. After adjusting for the confounding variables, a nested Cox model showed that diabetes duration was still an independent risk factor of MACCEs (HR: 1.963, 95% CI: 1.376, 2.801, p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve illustrated a significantly high risk of MACCEs (HR: 2.045, p < 0.0001) in long-duration DM patients. After propensity score matching, a longer diabetes duration was associated with an increased risk of MACCE occurrence.

CONCLUSION

Long-duration diabetes was independently associated with poor clinical outcomes after PCI in patients with their first myocardial infarction. Despite the diabetes duration, continuous hypoglycemic therapy significantly improved long-term clinical outcomes.

Long-Term Impact of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Introduction

The long-term impact of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors for secondary prevention in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and coexisting coronary artery disease remains unclear.

Methods

Altogether, 1,160 consecutive patients with CKD (mean age, 70 ± 9 years; 78% men) who underwent their first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2000 and 2018 were included and analyzed. Based on their RAS inhibitor use, 674 patients (58%) were allocated to the RAS inhibitor group, and 486 patients (42%) were allocated to the non-RAS inhibitor group. This study evaluated the incidence of 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE), including cardiovascular death, nonfatal acute coronary syndrome and nonfatal stroke, admission for heart failure (HF), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and all-cause death.

Results

During a median follow-up duration of 7.8 years, 280 patients (24.1%) developed 3P-MACE, 134 patients (11.6%) were hospitalized for HF, 171 patients (14.7%) underwent TVR, and 348 patients (30.0%) died of any causes. The cumulative incidence rate of 3P-MACE in the RAS inhibitor group was significantly lower than in the non-RAS inhibitor group (31.7% vs. 39.0%, log-rank test, p = 0.034); however, that of admission for HF in the RAS inhibitor group was significantly higher than in the non-RAS inhibitor group (28.1% vs. 13.3%, log-rank test, p < 0.001). The subgroup of preserved ejection fraction, non-acute myocardial infarction, and non-proteinuria tended to promote the onset of HF rather than cardiovascular prevention by RAS inhibitors.

Conclusion

The long-term RAS inhibitor use for patients with CKD after PCI might prevent cardiovascular events but increase the risk of HF.

Randomized evaluation of 5-month Ticagrelor monotherapy after 1-month dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with drug-coated balloons: REC-CAGEFREE II trial rationale and design

BACKGROUND

Patients treated with drug-coated balloons (DCB) have the theoretical advantage of adopting a low-intensity antiplatelet regimen due to the absence of struts and polymers. Nevertheless, the optimal antiplatelet strategy for patients undergoing DCB-only treatment remains a topic of debate and has not been investigated in randomized trials.

METHODS

The REC-CAGEFREE II is an investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, multi-center, randomized, non-inferiority trial aimed to enroll 1908 patients from ≥ 40 interventional cardiology centers in China to evaluate the non-inferiority of an antiplatelet regimen consisting of Aspirin plus Ticagrelor for one month, followed by five months Ticagrelor monotherapy, and then Aspirin monotherapy for six months (Experimental group) compared to the conventional treatment of Aspirin plus Ticagrelor for 12 months (Reference group) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using paclitaxel-coated balloons (DCB) exclusively. Participants will be randomly assigned to the Experimental or Reference group in a 1:1 ratio. The randomization will be stratified based on the center and the type of lesion being treated (De novo or in-stent restenosis). The primary endpoint is net adverse clinical events (NACE) within 12 months of PCI, which includes the composite of all-cause death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction, any revascularization and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) defined type 3 or 5 bleeding. The secondary endpoint, any ischemic and bleeding event, which includes all-cause death, any stroke, MI, BARC-defined type 3 bleeding, any revascularization, and BARC-defined type 2 bleeding events, will be treated as having hierarchical clinical importance in the above order and analyzed using the win ratio method.

DISCUSSION

The ongoing REC-CAGEFREE II trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of a low-intensity antiplatelet approach among ACS patients with DCB. If non-inferiority is shown, the novel antiplatelet approach could provide an alternative treatment for ACS patients with DCB.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04971356.

Frequency, Predictors, and Clinical Impact of Valvular and Perivalvular Thrombus After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Subclinical aortic valve complex (valvular and perivalvular) thrombus is not rare after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The risk factors and clinical implications of these findings remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the frequency, predictors, and clinical outcome of aortic valve complex thrombus after TAVR.

METHODS

In the ADAPT-TAVR (Anticoagulation Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Prevention of Leaflet Thrombosis and Cerebral Embolization After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement) trial comparing edoxaban vs dual antiplatelet therapy in TAVR patients without an indication for chronic anticoagulation, the frequency of valvular (subclinical leaflet thrombus) and perivalvular (supravalvular, subvalvular, and sinus of Valsalva) thrombus was evaluated by 4-dimensional computed tomography at 6 months. The association of these phenomena with new cerebral thromboembolism on brain magnetic resonance imaging, neurologic and neurocognitive dysfunction, and clinical outcomes was assessed.

RESULTS

Among 211 patients with 6-month computed tomography evaluations, 91 patients (43.1%) had thrombus at any aortic valve complex, 30 (14.2%) patients had leaflet thrombus, and 78 (37.0%) patients had perivalvular thrombus. A small maximum diameter of the stent at the valve level and low body surface area were independent predictors of aortic valve complex and perivalvular thrombus, and decreased renal function was an independent predictor of leaflet thrombus. No significant differences were observed in new cerebral lesions, neurologic or neurocognitive functions, or clinical outcomes among patients with or without valvular or perivalvular thrombus.

CONCLUSIONS

Subclinical aortic valve complex (valvular and perivalvular) thrombus was common in patients who had undergone successful TAVR. However, these imaging phenomena were not associated with new cerebral thromboembolism, neurologic or neurocognitive dysfunction, or adverse clinical outcomes. (Anticoagulation Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Prevention of Leaflet Thrombosis and Cerebral Embolization After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement [ADAPT-TAVR]; NCT03284827).

Effect of Edoxaban Versus Antiplatelet Therapy on Leaflet Thrombosis and Cerebral Thromboembolism After TAVI According to Major Clinical and Anatomic Factors in Prespecified Subgroup Analysis from the ADAPT-TAVR Trial

It is unknown whether edoxaban versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has differential treatment effects on leaflet thrombosis, cerebral thromboembolism, and neurologic or neurocognitive dysfunction according to clinical and anatomic factors after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. To investigate the relative effects of edoxaban and DAPT on leaflet and cerebral thromboembolism in patients with major risk factors. The primary end point of this study was the incidence of leaflet thrombosis on computed tomography at 6 months. The secondary end points were new cerebral lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging and neurologic and neurocognitive dysfunction between baseline and 6-month follow-up. Cox regression models assessed the consistency of the treatment effects in the prespecified subgroups. The favorable effect of edoxaban versus DAPT on the leaflet thrombosis was consistent across multiple clinical or anatomic subgroups, without significant interaction between the drug effect and each subgroup (p for interaction for age = 0.597, gender = 0.557, body mass index = 0.866, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score = 0.307, valve type = 0.702, edoxaban reduction criteria = 0.604, and valve morphology = 0.688). However, the incidence of new cerebral lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging and worsening of neurologic and neurocognitive function were not significantly different between the groups among the various key subgroups. The relative effects of edoxaban and DAPT on the risk of leaflet thrombosis, cerebral thromboembolism, and neurologic dysfunction were consistent across a diverse spectrum of clinical or anatomical factors. Further studies are required to define tailored antithrombotic therapy for high-risk groups with specific clinical or anatomic characteristics.

Postoperative delirium in 47 379 individuals undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

The study aims to discuss the assessment methods used for the incidence of in-hospital postoperative delirium (IHPOD) in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients and explore possible strategies for preventing and reducing postoperative complications in the geriatric population.

Methodology

An electronic search of PubMed, Embase, BioMedCentral, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted up to August 2021, to identify studies on the IHPOD following TAVR in patients above 70 years. The primary objective of the study was to determine the incidence of delirium following TAVR and procedures like transfemoral (TF) and non-TF approaches. The secondary objectives were to determine the incidence of stroke and incidence according to the confusion assessment method (CAM) diagnostic tool. The authors only included studies published in English and excluded patients with comorbidities and studies with inaccessible full-text.

Results

Among the selected 42 studies with 47 379 patients, the incidence of IHPOD following TAVR was 10.5% (95% CI: 9.2-11.9%, I2=95.82%, P<0.001). Incidence based on CAM was 15.6% (95% CI: 10.5-20.7%, I2=95.36%, P<0.001). The incidence of IHPOD after TF-TAVR was 9.3% (95% CI: 7.6-11.0%, I2=94.52%, P<0.001), and after non-TF TAVI was 25.3% (95% CI: 15.4-35.1%, I2=92.45%, P<0.001). The incidence of stroke was 3.7% (95% CI: 2.9-4.5%, I2=89.76%, P<0.001). Meta-regression analyses between mean age (P=0.146), logistic EuroSCORE (P=0.099), or percentage of participants treated using the TF approach (P=0.276) were nonsignificant while stroke (P=0.010) was significant. When considering these variables, the residual heterogeneity remained high indicating that other variables influence the heterogeneity.

Conclusion

IHPOD following TAVR was observed in 10.5% of individuals and in 15.6% using CAM. Its incidence was found to be three times higher after non-TF TAVR (25.3%) compared to TF TAVR (9.3%). Stroke showed an incidence of 3.7% after TAVR and was found to be significantly associated with the risk of developing delirium following TAVR. Further studies are needed to evaluate possible causes and risk factors responsible for delirium and to assess the role of anesthesia and cerebral embolic protection in preventing delirium after TAVR.

Real-Life Performance and Clinical Outcomes of Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve with FlexNav Delivery System: One-Year Data from a Single-Center Experience

Significant progress has been made in both valves and delivery systems (DSs) for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures. We aimed to present one-year real-life data regarding TAVR procedures using Portico transcatheter heart valves (THVs) with new-generation, low-profile FlexNav DSs. This retrospective, single-center study enrolled 169 consecutive patients (mean age: 75.8 years, 68% females) with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR with Portico THVs and FlexNav DSs between 2020 and 2021. We evaluated safety and efficacy outcomes, following the VARC-3 consensus, periprocedurally and at 30 days and 1 year. Procedural success was observed in 95.9% of cases, and no procedural mortality occurred. At 30 days, the rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and neurological events were 4.7%, 3.6%, and 3.0%, respectively. Additionally, major vascular complications, acute kidney injury, and bleeding were recorded at rates of 11.2%, 14.8%, and 7.7%, respectively. The 1-year data showed all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and neurological event rates of 10.7%, 8.3%, and 7.7%, respectively. The moderate paravalvular leak and permanent pacemaker rates at 1 year were 2.6% and 12.2%, respectively. This real-life data provided evidence of positive outcomes and high technical success with Portico THVs and FlexNav DSs. Furthermore, we found low rates of mortality and neurological events, with satisfactory hemodynamic and functional results.

STICH3C: Rationale and Study Protocol

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the recommended mode of revascularization in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (iLVSD) and multivessel disease. However, contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes have improved with the integration of novel technologies and refinement of revascularization strategies, and PCI is often used in clinical practice in this population. There is a lack of evidence from randomized trials comparing contemporary state-of-the-art PCI versus CABG for the treatment of iLVSD and multivessel disease. This was the impetus for the STICH3C trial (Canadian CABG or PCI in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy), described here.

METHODS

The STICH3C trial is a prospective, unblinded, international, multicenter trial with an expected sample size of 754 participants from ≈45 centers. Patients with multivessel/left main coronary artery disease and iLVSD with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% considered by the local Heart Team appropriate for and amenable to revascularization by both modes of revascularization will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to state-of-the-art PCI or CABG.

RESULTS

The primary end point is the composite of death from any cause, stroke, spontaneous myocardial infarction, urgent repeat revascularization, or heart failure readmission, summarized as a time-to-event outcome. The key hierarchical end point is time to death and frequency of hospitalizations for heart failure. The key safety outcome is a composite of major adverse events. Disease-specific quality-of-life and health economics measures will be compared between groups. Participants will be followed for a median of 5 years, with a minimum follow-up of 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

STICH3C will directly inform patients, clinicians, and international practice guidelines about the efficacy and safety of CABG versus PCI in patients with iLVSD. The results will provide novel and broad evidence, including clinical events, health status, and economic assessments, to guide care for patients with iLVSD and severe coronary artery disease.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT05427370.

Routine cerebral embolic protection in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: rationale and design of the randomised British Heart Foundation PROTECT-TAVI trial

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment for aortic stenosis. Cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices may impact periprocedural stroke by capturing debris destined for the brain. However, there is a lack of high-quality randomised trial evidence supporting the use of CEP during TAVI. The British Heart Foundation (BHF) PROTECT-TAVI trial will address whether the routine use of CEP reduces the incidence of stroke in patients undergoing TAVI. BHF PROTECT-TAVI is a prospective, open-label, outcome-adjudicated, multicentre randomised controlled trial. The trial is open to all adult patients scheduled for TAVI at participating specialist cardiac centres across the United Kingdom who are able to receive the CEP device. The trial will recruit 7,730 participants. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to undergo TAVI with CEP or TAVI without CEP (standard of care). The primary outcome is the incidence of stroke at 72 hours post-TAVI. Key secondary outcomes include the incidence of stroke and all-cause mortality up to 12 months post-TAVI, disability and cognitive outcomes, stroke severity, access site complications and a health economics analysis. The sample size of 7,730 participants has 80% power to detect a 33% relative risk reduction from a 3% incidence of the primary outcome in the controls. Trial recruitment commenced in October 2020. As of October 2022, 3,068 patients have been enrolled. BHF PROTECT-TAVI is designed to provide definitive evidence on the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using routine CEP with the SENTINEL device to reduce stroke in TAVI.

The Relationship Between Hospital Stroke Center Designation and TVT Reported Stroke: The Michigan TAVR Experience

BACKGROUND

The 30-day rate of stroke after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been suggested as a hospital quality metric. Thirty-day stroke rates for nonsurgical, high, and moderate-risk TAVR trials were 3.4% to 6.1%, whereas those in the national Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) Registry for the same patient population were much lower. Hospital comprehensive stroke center (CSC) is the highest designation for integrated acute stroke recognition, management, and care.

OBJECTIVES

Using Michigan TVT data, we assessed whether in-hospital post-TAVR stroke rates varied between CSC and non-CSC institutions.

METHODS

TVT data submitted from the 22 Michigan Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Collaborative participating institutions between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2019, were included (N = 6,231). Bayesian hierarchical regression models accounting for patient clinical characteristics and hospital clustering were fitted to assess the association between hospital CSC accreditation and in-hospital post-TAVR stroke. Adjusted ORs and 95% credible intervals were estimated. The University of Michigan Institutional Review Board has waived the need for the approval of studies based on the data collected by the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium registry.

RESULTS

There were 3,882 (62.3%) patients at 9 CSC sites and 2,349 (37.7%) patients at 13 non-CSC sites. CSC sites had significantly higher rates of in-hospital post-TAVR stroke (CSC: 2.65% vs non-CSC: 1.15%; P < 0.001). After adjustment, patients who underwent TAVR at a CSC hospital had a significantly higher risk of in-hospital stroke (adjusted OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.03-4.62). However, CSC designation was not significantly associated with other important post-TAVR clinical outcomes including 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Reported Michigan Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Collaborative TVT stroke rates were significantly higher at sites with Joint Hospital Commission stroke designation status; however, other reported important clinical outcomes did not differ significantly based on this designation. CSC designation is a possible factor in stroke rate detection differences between TAVR institutions and might be a factor in the observed differences in stroke rates between TAVR trials and those reported in TVT. In addition, these data suggest that comparison between hospitals based on post-TAVR stroke rates is potentially problematic.

Original Research: Practice Variations in Documenting Neurologic Examinations in Non-Neuroscience ICUs

BACKGROUND

In critical care units, the neurologic examination (neuro exam) is used to detect changes in neurologic function. Serial neuro exams are a hallmark of monitoring in neuroscience ICUs. But less is known about neuro exams that are performed in non-neuroscience ICUs. This knowledge gap likely contributes to the insufficient guidance on what constitutes an adequate neuro exam for patients admitted to a non-neuroscience ICU.

PURPOSE

The study purpose was to explore existing practices for documenting neuro exams in ICUs that don't routinely admit patients with a primary neurologic injury.

METHODS

A single-center, prospective, observational study examined documented neuro exams performed in medical, surgical, and cardiovascular ICUs. A comprehensive neuro exam assesses seven domains that can be divided into 20 components. In this study, each component was scored as present (documentation was found) or absent (documentation was not found); a domain was scored as present if one or more of its components had been documented.

RESULTS

There were 1,482 assessments documented on 120 patients over a one-week period. A majority of patients were male (56%), White (71%), non-Hispanic (77%), and over 60 years of age (50%). Overall, assessments of the domains of consciousness, injury severity, and cranial nerve function were documented 80% of the time or more. Assessments of the domains of pain, motor function, and sensory function were documented less than 60% of the time, and that of speech less than 5% of the time. Statistically significant differences in documentation were found between the medical, surgical, and cardiovascular ICUs for the domains of speech, cranial nerve function, and pain. There were no significant differences in documentation frequency between day and night shift nurses. Documentation practices were significantly different for RNs versus providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that the frequency and specific components of neuro exam documentation vary significantly across nurses, providers, and ICUs. These findings are relevant for nurses and providers and may help to improve guidance for neurologic assessment of patients in non-neurologic ICUs. Further studies exploring variance in documentation practices and their implications for courses of treatment and patient outcomes are warranted.

Neurological outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with or without cerebral embolic protection devices: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) are designed to prevent embolization of debris during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Current evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies is controversial.

AIMS

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to study the influence of CEPDs on stroke, silent ischemic lesions and neurocognitive function.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted including RCTs or adjusted observational studies comparing TAVI with or without CEPDs. Pooled odds ratios, risk ratios or standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the inverse of variance method. Risk of bias sensitivity analyses and meta regression for CEPD type were also conducted.

RESULTS

Five RCTs and five adjusted observational studies were included (n= 159,865). Mean age of the patients was 81.1 (SD 1.04) years in CEPDs and 81 (SD 1.86) in non-CEPD. The overall quality of evidence using the GRADE system for each endpoint was low to very low, mainly due to serious risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision. Random effects meta-analysis detected no significant differences between CEPD and non-CEPD (OR= 0.74; 95% CI 0.51-1.07; P= 0.105; I²= 82.1%) for 30-day stroke. This finding was consistent in meta regression for CEPD type and subgroup analyses by study type and CEPD type. No significant differences between groups were observed in cerebral DW-MRI assessment and neurocognitive function evaluation.

CONCLUSION

In the present meta- analysis of five RCTs and five adjusted observational studies, the use of a CEPD during TAVI was not associated with a significant benefit on 30- day stroke, total lesion volume per patient, number of ischemic lesions per patient and neurocognitive function assessments.

Intravenous Thrombolysis After First-Ever Ischemic Stroke and Reduced Incident Dementia Rate

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The use of intravenous thrombolysis is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Whether thrombolysis is associated with reduced incidence of poststroke dementia remains uncertain. We sought to estimate if the use of thrombolysis following first-ever ischemic stroke was associated with a reduced rate of incident dementia using a pragmatic observational design.

METHODS

We included first-ever ischemic stroke patients from the Ontario Stroke Registry who had not previously been diagnosed with dementia. The primary outcome was incident dementia ascertained by a validated diagnostic algorithm. We employed inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the cause-specific hazard ratio for the association of thrombolysis and incident dementia at 1 and 5 years following stroke.

RESULTS

From July 2003 to March 2013, 7072 patients with ischemic stroke were included, 3276 (46.3%) were female and mean age was 71.0 (SD, 12.8) years. Overall, 38.2% of the cohort (n=2705) received thrombolysis, 77.2% (n=2087) of which was administered within 3 hours of stroke onset. In the first year following stroke, thrombolysis administration was associated with a 24% relative reduction in the rate of developing dementia (cause-specific hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.58-0.97]). This association remained significant at 5 years (cause-specific hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.66-0.91]) and at the end of follow-up (median 6.3 years; cause-specific hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.68-0.89]).

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombolysis administration following first-ever ischemic stroke was independently associated with a reduced rate of dementia. Incident dementia should be considered as a relevant outcome when evaluating risk/benefit of thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients.

Randomised controlled trial to investigate optimal antithrombotic therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a study protocol of the OPTIMA-AF trial

INTRODUCTION

The optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is uncertain. For patients with non-AF, many trials are now evaluating short 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy. In patients with AF undergoing PCI, in contrast, short dual therapy (P2Y12 inhibitor +direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)) has not yet been evaluated.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The OPTIMA-AF trial (OPTIMAl antiplatelet therapy in combination with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting stent) is an investigator-initiated, open-label, nationwide, multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy and safety of short dual therapy (1-month DOAC +P2Y12 inhibitor followed by DOAC monotherapy) against long dual therapy (12-month DOAC +P2Y12 inhibitor followed by DOAC monotherapy) in the treatment of AF subjects undergoing PCI. The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of death or thromboembolic events (myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, stroke or systemic embolism) at 365 days; and the primary safety endpoint is bleeding (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding) at 365 days. This trial is intended to show the non-inferiority of short dual therapy versus long dual therapy in terms of the primary efficacy endpoint and show superiority in terms of the primary safety endpoint. A total of 1090 subjects will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio at approximately 60 sites.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study received approval from the Certified Review Board of Osaka University (a certified research ethics committee by the Japanese Clinical Research Act). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCTs051190053; Pre-results.

Access site complications of postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of primary arterial access in patients receiving peripheral postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support on associated complications and outcome.

METHODS

Of 573 consecutive patients requiring PC-ECLS between 2000 and 2019 at a single center, 436 were included in a retrospective analysis and grouped according to primary arterial extracorporeal life support access site. Survival and rate of access-site-related complications with special emphasis on fatal/disabling stroke were compared.

RESULTS

The axillary artery was cannulated in 250 patients (57.3%), whereas the femoral artery was used as primary arterial access in 186 patients (42.6%). There was no significant difference in 30-day (axillary: 62%; femoral: 64.7%; P = .561) and 1-year survival (axillary: 42.5%; femoral: 44.8%; P = .657). Cerebral computed tomography-confirmed stroke with a modified ranking scale ≥4 was significantly more frequent in the axillary group (axillary: n = 28, 11.2%; femoral: n = 4, 2.2%; P = .0003). Stroke localization was right hemispheric (n = 20; 62.5%); left hemispheric (n = 5; 15.6%), bilateral (n = 5; 15.6%), or infratentorial (n = 2; 6.25%). Although no difference in major cannulation site bleeding was observed, cannulation site change for bleeding was more frequent in the axillary group (axillary: n = 13; 5.2%; femoral: n = 2; 1.1%; P = .03). Clinically apparent limb ischemia was significantly more frequent in the femoral group (axillary: n = 12, 4.8%; femoral: n = 31, 16.7%; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although survival did not differ, surgeons should be aware of access-site-specific complications when choosing peripheral PC-ECLS access. Although lower rates of limb ischemia and the advantage of antegrade flow seem beneficial for axillary cannulation, the high incidence of right hemispheric strokes in axillary artery cannulation should be considered.

Long-term impact of β-blocker in elderly patients without myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention

AIMS

Little is known about the long-term outcomes of β-blockers use in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) without myocardial infarction (MI) and reduced ejection fraction (rEF). However, more attention should be paid to the oral administration of β-blockers in elderly patients who are susceptible to heart failure (HF), sinus node dysfunction, or rate response insufficiency. We aimed to evaluate the long-term impact of β-blockers in elderly patients with CAD without MI or systolic HF who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1018 consecutive elderly patients with CAD (mean age, 72 ± 7 years; 77% men) who underwent their first intervention between 2010 and 2018 were included in this study. According to the presence or absence of the use of β-blockers, 514 patients (50.5%) were allocated to the β-blocker group, and 504 (49.5%) to the non-β-blocker group. We evaluated the incidence of 4-point major adverse cardiovascular events (4P-MACE), including cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, admission for HF, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and all-cause death. We focused on the association between chronotropic incompetence of β-blockers and incidence of a new HF and analysed the results using an exercise electrocardiogram regularly performed in the outpatient department after percutaneous coronary intervention. During a median follow-up duration of 5.1 years, 83 patients (8.3%) developed 4P-MACE, including cardiovascular death in 17, non-fatal MI in 13, non-fatal stroke in 25, and admission for HF in 39 patients. Additionally, 124 patients (12.2%) had a TVR and 104 (10.2%) died of other causes. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative incidence rate of 4P-MACE in the β-blocker group was significantly higher than that in the non-β-blocker group (15.4% vs. 10.0%, log-rank test, P = 0.015). Above all, the cumulative incidence rate of admission for HF in the β-blocker group was significantly higher (8.8% vs. 3.2%, log-rank test, P < 0.001). The β-blocker group had significantly lower resting heart rate, stress heart rate, and stress-rest Δ heart rate on exercise electrocardiogram. Multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that EF, β-blocker use, stress-rest Δ heart rate, and CKD were strong independent predictors of admission for HF.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term β-blocker use was significantly associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events in elderly patients with CAD without MI or systolic HF. In particular, the chronotropic incompetence action of β-blockers could increase the risk of admission for HF in elderly patients with CAD without MI and systolic HF, and the present findings warrant further investigation.

Neurologic Dysfunction and Neuroprotection in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a fast-growing procedure. Expanding to low-risk patients, it has surpassed surgical aortic valve implantation in frequency and has been associated with excellent outcomes. Stroke is a devastating complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Silent brain infarcts identified by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging are present in most patients following TAVI. Postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction are common neurologic complications. The stroke and silent brain infarcts are likely caused by particulate emboli released during the procedure. Intravascularly positioned cerebral embolic protection devices are designed to prevent debris from entering the aortic arch vessels to avoid stroke. Despite promising design, randomized clinical trials have not demonstrated a reduction in stroke in patients receiving cerebral embolic protection devices. Similarly, the association of cerebral embolic protection devices with silent brain infarcts, postoperative delirium, and cognitive dysfunction is uncertain. Monitored anesthesia care or conscious sedation is as safe as general anesthesia and is associated with lower cost, but different anesthetic techniques have not been shown to decrease stroke risk, postoperative delirium, or cognitive dysfunction. Anesthesiologists play important roles in providing perioperative care including management of neurologic events in patients undergoing TAVI. Large randomized clinical trials are needed that focus on the correlation between perioperative interventions and neurologic outcomes.

Intimal aortic atherosclerosis in cardiac surgery: surgical strategies to prevent embolic stroke

 

OBJECTIVES

Although the incidence of perioperative stroke after cardiac surgery gradually decreased over the last decades, there is much variation between centres. This review aimed to create a concise overview of the evidence on possible surgical strategies to prevent embolic stroke in patients with intimal aortic atherosclerosis.

METHODS

The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for studies on surgical management of aortic atherosclerosis and the association with perioperative stroke in cardiac surgery, including specific searches on the most common types of surgery. Articles were screened with emphasis on studies comparing multiple strategies and studies reporting on the patients’ severity of aortic atherosclerosis. The main findings were summarized in a figure, with a grade of the corresponding level of evidence.

RESULTS

Regarding embolic stroke risk, aortic atherosclerosis of the tunica intima is most relevant. Although several strategies in general cardiac surgery seem to be beneficial in severe disease, none have conclusively been proven most effective. Off-pump surgery in coronary artery bypass grafting should be preferred with severe atherosclerosis, if the required expertise is present. Although transcatheter aortic valve replacement is used as an alternative to surgery in patients with a porcelain aorta, the risk profile concerning intimal atherosclerosis remains poorly defined.

CONCLUSIONS

A tailored approach that uses the discussed alternative strategies in carefully selected patients is best suited to reduce the risk of perioperative stroke without compromising other outcomes. More research is needed, especially on the perioperative stroke risk in patients with moderate aortic atherosclerosis.

Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research

Aims 

The Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC), founded in 2010, was intended to (i) identify appropriate clinical endpoints and (ii) standardize definitions of these endpoints for transcatheter and surgical aortic valve clinical trials. Rapid evolution of the field, including the emergence of new complications, expanding clinical indications, and novel therapy strategies have mandated further refinement and expansion of these definitions to ensure clinical relevance. This document provides an update of the most appropriate clinical endpoint definitions to be used in the conduct of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve clinical research.

Methods and results 

Several years after the publication of the VARC-2 manuscript, an in-person meeting was held involving over 50 independent clinical experts representing several professional societies, academic research organizations, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and industry representatives to (i) evaluate utilization of VARC endpoint definitions in clinical research, (ii) discuss the scope of this focused update, and (iii) review and revise specific clinical endpoint definitions. A writing committee of independent experts was convened and subsequently met to further address outstanding issues. There were ongoing discussions with FDA and many experts to develop a new classification schema for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure. Overall, this multi-disciplinary process has resulted in important recommendations for data reporting, clinical research methods, and updated endpoint definitions. New definitions or modifications of existing definitions are being proposed for repeat hospitalizations, access site-related complications, bleeding events, conduction disturbances, cardiac structural complications, and bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure (including valve leaflet thickening and thrombosis). A more granular 5-class grading scheme for paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is being proposed to help refine the assessment of PVR. Finally, more specific recommendations on quality-of-life assessments have been included, which have been targeted to specific clinical study designs.

Conclusions 

Acknowledging the dynamic and evolving nature of less-invasive aortic valve therapies, further refinements of clinical research processes are required. The adoption of these updated and newly proposed VARC-3 endpoints and definitions will ensure homogenous event reporting, accurate adjudication, and appropriate comparisons of clinical research studies involving devices and new therapeutic strategies.

Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research

AIMS

The Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC), founded in 2010, was intended to (i) identify appropriate clinical endpoints and (ii) standardize definitions of these endpoints for transcatheter and surgical aortic valve clinical trials. Rapid evolution of the field, including the emergence of new complications, expanding clinical indications, and novel therapy strategies have mandated further refinement and expansion of these definitions to ensure clinical relevance. This document provides an update of the most appropriate clinical endpoint definitions to be used in the conduct of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve clinical research.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Several years after the publication of the VARC-2 manuscript, an in-person meeting was held involving over 50 independent clinical experts representing several professional societies, academic research organizations, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and industry representatives to (i) evaluate utilization of VARC endpoint definitions in clinical research, (ii) discuss the scope of this focused update, and (iii) review and revise specific clinical endpoint definitions. A writing committee of independent experts was convened and subsequently met to further address outstanding issues. There were ongoing discussions with FDA and many experts to develop a new classification schema for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure. Overall, this multi-disciplinary process has resulted in important recommendations for data reporting, clinical research methods, and updated endpoint definitions. New definitions or modifications of existing definitions are being proposed for repeat hospitalizations, access site-related complications, bleeding events, conduction disturbances, cardiac structural complications, and bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure (including valve leaflet thickening and thrombosis). A more granular 5-class grading scheme for paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is being proposed to help refine the assessment of PVR. Finally, more specific recommendations on quality-of-life assessments have been included, which have been targeted to specific clinical study designs.

CONCLUSIONS

Acknowledging the dynamic and evolving nature of less-invasive aortic valve therapies, further refinements of clinical research processes are required. The adoption of these updated and newly proposed VARC-3 endpoints and definitions will ensure homogenous event reporting, accurate adjudication, and appropriate comparisons of clinical research studies involving devices and new therapeutic strategies.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Silent Brain Infarction After On-Pump Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression of 29 Prospective Cohort Studies

BACKGROUND

Silent brain infarction (SBI) happens at a considerable rate after on-pump cardiac surgery. Though termed silent, SBI is related to unfavorable clinical outcomes including higher incidence of future stroke and neurocognitive impairment in the general population. The risk factors of SBI have not been fully identified in both individual studies and several meta-analyses addressing the topic. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to conduct meta-regression analysis for the first time to explore risk factors for SBI after on-pump cardiac surgery.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Medline, Embase, Central, Web of Science, and Wiley databases were searched for relevant studies. Preoperative patient baseline characteristics and intraoperative surgical parameters were extracted from included studies. For meta-regression, a P value of less than 0.1 was considered statistically significant in both univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies with 1478 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The summarized SBI rate after on-pump cardiac surgery was 37% (95% CI 0.27-0.47, P < 0.0001). Heterogeneity between studies was significant (I2 = 94.9%, P < 0.0001). In multivariable meta-regression, we found that age (coefficient 0.014, 95% CI 0.001-0.029, P = 0.043), diabetes (coefficient 0.006, 95% CI - 0.001 to 0.013, P = 0.075), and proportion of CABG (coefficient - 0.001, 95% CI - 0.003 to 0.0003, P = 0.096) were significantly associated with SBI incidence.

CONCLUSION

From the meta-regression, we concluded that advanced age and diabetes were related to increased SBI incidence after on-pump cardiac surgery, while CABG procedure alone was associated with less SBI onset. Studies with more accurate diagnoses of SBI are required to add more conclusive evidence to the field.

Periprocedural Stroke After Coronary Revascularization (from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-3)

There is a scarcity of data on incidence, risk factors, especially clinical severity, and long-term prognostic impact of periprocedural stroke after coronary revascularization in contemporary real-world practice. Among 14,867 consecutive patients undergoing first coronary revascularization between January 2011 and December 2013 (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]: N = 13258, and coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]: N = 1609) in the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG registry Cohort-3, we evaluated the details on periprocedural stroke. Periprocedural stroke was defined as stroke within 30 days after the index procedure. Incidence of periprocedural stroke was 0.96% after PCI and 2.13% after CABG (log-rank p <0.001). Proportions of major stroke defined by modified Rankin Scale ≥2 at hospital discharge were 68% after PCI, and 77% after CABG. Independent risk factors of periprocedural stroke were acute coronary syndrome (ACS), carotid artery disease, advanced age, heart failure, and end-stage renal disease after PCI, whereas they were ACS, carotid artery disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignancy, and frailty after CABG. There was excess long-term mortality risk of patients with periprocedural stroke relative to those without after both PCI and CABG (hazard ratio 1.71 [1.25 to 2.33], and hazard ratio 4.55 [2.79 to 7.43]). In conclusion, incidence of periprocedural stroke was not negligible not only after CABG, but also after PCI in contemporary real-world practice. Majority of patients with periprocedural stroke had at least mild disability at hospital discharge. ACS and carotid artery disease were independent strong risk factors of periprocedural stroke after both PCI and CABG. Periprocedural stroke was associated with significant long-term mortality risk after both PCI and CABG.

Trial Design Principles for Patients at High Bleeding Risk Undergoing PCI: JACC Scientific Expert Panel

Investigating the balance of risk for thrombotic and bleeding events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is especially relevant for patients at high bleeding risk (HBR). The Academic Research Consortium for HBR recently proposed a consensus definition in an effort to standardize the patient population included in HBR trials. The aim of this consensus-based document, the second initiative from the Academic Research Consortium for HBR, is to propose recommendations to guide the design of clinical trials of devices and drugs in HBR patients undergoing PCI. The authors discuss the designs of trials in HBR patients undergoing PCI and various aspects of trial design specific to HBR patients, including target populations, intervention and control groups, primary and secondary outcomes, and timing of endpoint reporting.

Aortic calcifications on routine preoperative chest X-ray and perioperative stroke during cardiac surgery: a nested matched case-control study

OBJECTIVES

Perioperative stroke in cardiac surgery is most often embolic in origin. Preoperative chest X-ray (CXR) is routinely used amongst others to screen for relevant aortic calcification, a potential source of embolic stroke. We performed a nested matched case-control study to examine the relationship between aortic calcifications on CXR and the occurrence of embolic stroke.

METHODS

Among all consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery in our hospital between January 2014 and July 2017, we selected all patients with perioperative embolic stroke (cases). Controls, all patients without perioperative stroke, were matched on age, sex and type of surgery. All preoperative CXRs were scored for aortic calcifications (none, mild, severe) in the ascending aorta, arch, aortic knob and descending aorta.

RESULTS

Out of the 3038 eligible patients, 27 cases were detected and 78 controls were selected. In the stroke group, mild-to-severe calcifications were found least often in the ascending aorta [9% of patients, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1-29%] and most frequently in the aortic knob (63% of patients, 95% CI 44-78%). The distribution of aortic calcification was comparable in cases versus controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcification burden was comparable between the cases and their matched controls. In our study population, CXR findings on aortic calcification were not related to the risk of embolic stroke. In these patients, the correlation between findings on the preoperative CXR and the risk of stroke might, therefore, be too weak to use the CXR directly for the assessment of the safety of manipulating the ascending aorta during surgery.