The ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Inflammatory Bowel Disease Collaborative: Design, Implementation, and Validation of a Disease-specific Module

Association of Race and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Previous literature suggests that rates of postoperative complications following inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) surgery differ based on race.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between race and adverse events and wound complications in patients with IBD.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program Inflammatory Bowel Disease Collaborative from 2017 to 2022. The data was collected from 15 high-volume IBD centers across the United States. The data was analyzed using crude and multivariable logistic regressions.

RESULTS

4284 patients were included in the study. Overall rates of adverse events and wound complications were 20.3% and 11.3%, respectively, and did not differ based on race on bivariate analysis. Rates of adverse events were 20.0% vs 24.6% vs 22.1%, p = 0.13 for white, black and other minority subjects, respectively. The adjusted odds of adverse events were higher for black subjects (1.46 [95%CI 1.0-2.1], p = 0.03) compared to white subjects. No difference in adverse events was found between other minority subjects and either black or white subjects (1.29 [0.7-2.3], p = 0.58). Race was not associated with likelihood of wound complications in the final analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that a subset of black patients with IBD continue to experience more adverse events compared to white patients, primarily driven by a higher need for postoperative blood transfusion. Nonetheless, known risk factors, including comorbid conditions, decreased BMI, open surgery, and emergency surgery have a stronger association with postoperative complications than race alone.

Cutdown is Associated with Higher 30-day Unplanned Readmissions and Wound Complications than Percutaneous Access for EVAR

BACKGROUND

A 2023 Cochrane review showed no difference in bleeding/wound infection complications, short-term mortality and aneurysm exclusion between the percutaneous and cut-down approach for femoral access in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). In contrast, single-center studies have shown bilateral cutdown resulting in higher readmission rates due to higher rates of groin wound infections. Whether 30-day readmission rates vary by type of access during EVAR procedures is unknown. The goal of this study was to ascertain which femoral access approach for EVAR is associated with the lowest risk of 30-day readmission.

METHODS

The Targeted Vascular Module from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify patients undergoing EVAR for aortic disease from 2012-2021. All ruptures and other emergency cases were excluded. Cohorts were divided into bilateral cutdown, unilateral cutdown, failed percutaneous attempt converted to open and successful percutaneous access. The primary 30-day outcomes were unplanned readmission and wound complications. Univariate analyses were performed using the Fisher's exact test, Chi-Square test and the Student's t-test. Multivariable analysis was performed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2021, 14,002 patients met study criteria. Most (7,395 [53%]) underwent completely percutaneous access, 5,616 (40%) underwent bilateral cutdown, 849 (6%) underwent unilateral cutdown, and 146 (1%) had a failed percutaneous access which was converted to open. Unplanned readmissions by access strategy included 7.6% for bilateral cutdown, 7.3% for unilateral cutdown, 7.8% for attempted percutaneous converted to cutdown, and 5.7% for completely percutaneous access (P < 0.001, Figure 1). After multivariable analysis, unplanned readmissions compared to percutaneous access yielded: percutaneous converted to cutdown adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.38, 95% CI [0.76-2.53], P = 0.29; unilateral cutdown AOR: 1.18, 95% CI [0.92-1.51], P = 0.20; bilateral cutdown AOR: 1.26, 95% CI [1.09-1.43], P = 0.001. Bilateral cutdown was also associated with higher wound complications compared to percutaneous access (AOR: 4.41, CI [2.86-6.79], P < 0.001), as was unilateral cutdown (AOR: 3.04, CI [1.46-6.32], P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing cutdown for EVAR are at higher risk for 30-day readmission compared to completely percutaneous access. If patient anatomy allows for percutaneous EVAR, this access option should be prioritized.

Surgery for inflammatory bowel disease in Spain: How are we doing? Initial results of a nationwide prospective registry

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), requires a multidisciplinary approach, and surgery is commonly needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the types of surgery performed in these patients in a nationwide study by hospital type, global postoperative complications, and quality of life after surgery.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, national observational study was designed to collect the results of surgical treatment of IBD in Spain. Demographic characteristics, medical-surgical treatments, postoperative complications and quality of life were recorded with a one-year follow-up. Data were validated and entered by a surgeon from each institution.

RESULTS

A total of 1134 patients (77 centers) were included: 888 CD, 229 UC, and 17 indeterminate colitis. 1169 surgeries were recorded: 882 abdominal and 287 perianal. Before surgery, 81.6% of the patients were evaluated by a multidisciplinary committee, and the mean preoperative waiting time for elective surgery was 2.09 ± 2 meses (P > .05). Overall morbidity after one year of follow-up was 16%, and the major complication rate was 36.4%. Significant differences were observed among centers in complex CD surgeries. Overall quality of life improved after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

There is heterogeneity in the surgical treatment of IBD among Spanish centers. Differences were observed in patients with highly complex surgeries. Overall quality of life improved with surgical treatment.

Impact of Preoperative Factors in Patients With IBD on Postoperative Length of Stay: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Inflammatory Bowel Disease Collaborative Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with IBD are challenging to manage perioperatively because of disease complexity and multiple comorbidities.

OBJECTIVE

To identify whether preoperative factors and operation type were associated with extended postoperative length of stay after IBD-related surgery, defined by 75th percentile or greater (n = 926; 30.8%).

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study based on a retrospective multicenter database.

SETTING

The National Surgery Quality Improvement Program-Inflammatory Bowel Disease Collaborative captured data from 15 high-volume sites.

PATIENTS

A total of 3008 patients with IBD (1710 with Crohn's disease and 1291 with ulcerative colitis) with a median postoperative length of stay of 4 days (interquartile range, 3-7) from March 2017 to February 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was extended postoperative length of stay.

RESULTS

On multivariable logistic regression, increased odds of extended postoperative length of stay were associated with multiple demographic and clinical factors (model p < 0.001, area under receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.85). Clinically significant contributors that increased postoperative length of stay were rectal surgery (vs colon; OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.52-2.98), new ileostomy (vs no ileostomy; OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.15-1.97), preoperative hospitalization (OR, 13.45; 95% CI, 10.15-17.84), non-home discharge (OR, 4.78; 95% CI, 2.27-10.08), hypoalbuminemia (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.27-2.18), and bleeding disorder (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.22-4.82).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective review of only high-volume centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBD who were preoperatively hospitalized, who had non-home discharge, and who underwent rectal surgery had the highest odds of extended postoperative length of stay. Associated patient characteristics included bleeding disorder, hypoalbuminemia, and ASA classes 3 to 5. Chronic corticosteroid, immunologic, small molecule, and biologic agent use were insignificant on multivariable analysis. See Video Abstract.

IMPACTO DE LOS FACTORES PREOPERATORIOS EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL EN LA DURACIN DE LA ESTANCIA POSTOPERATORIA UN ANLISIS COLABORATIVO DEL PROGRAMA NACIONAL DE MEJORA DE LA CALIDAD QUIRRGICAENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL

ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal son difíciles de manejar perioperatoriamente debido a la complejidad de la enfermedad y a múltiples comorbilidades.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar si los factores preoperatorios y el tipo de operación se asociaron con una estadía postoperatoria prolongada después de una cirugía relacionada con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, definida por el percentil 75 o mayor (n = 926, 30.8%).DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio transversal basado en una base de datos multicéntrica retrospectiva.ESCENARIO:Datos capturados de quince sitios de alto volumen en El Programa Nacional de Mejoramiento de la Calidad de la Cirugía-Enfermedad Intestinal Inflamatoria en colaboración.PACIENTES:Un total de 3,008 pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (1,710 con enfermedad de Crohn y 1,291 con colitis ulcerosa) con una mediana de estancia postoperatoria de 4 días (RIC 3-7) desde marzo de 2017 hasta febrero de 2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la extensión de la estancia postoperatoria.RESULTADOS:En la regresión logística multivariable, el aumento de las probabilidades de prolongar la estancia postoperatoria se asoció con múltiples factores demográficos y clínicos (modelo p<0.001, área bajo la curva ROC - 0.85). Los contribuyentes clínicamente significativos que aumentaron la duración de la estancia postoperatoria fueron la cirugía rectal (frente al colon) (OR 2.13, IC del 95 %: 1.52 a 2.98), una nueva ileostomía (frente a ninguna ileostomía) (OR 1.50, IC del 95 %: 1.15 a 1.97), hospitalización preoperatoria (OR 13.45, IC 95% 10.15-17.84), alta no domiciliaria (OR 4.78, IC 95% 2.27-10.08), hipoalbuminemia (OR 1.66, IC 95% 1.27-2.18) y trastorno hemorrágico (OR 2.42, IC 95% 1.22-4.82).LIMITACIONES:Revisión retrospectiva de solo centros de alto volumen.CONCLUSIONES:Los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal que fueron hospitalizados antes de la operación, que tuvieron alta no domiciliaria y que se sometieron a cirugía rectal tuvieron las mayores probabilidades de prolongar la estancia postoperatoria. Las características asociadas de los pacientes incluyeron trastorno hemorrágico, hipoalbuminemia y clases ASA 3-5. El uso crónico de corticosteroides, inmunológicos, agentes de moléculas pequeñas y de agentes biológicos no fue significativo en el análisis multivariable. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).

Conventional Frailty Index Does Not Predict Risk of Postoperative Complications in Patients With IBD: A Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Frailty has been associated with adverse outcomes in patients with IBD.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the association between health deficit-defined frailty (using the 5-factor modified frailty index) and postoperative outcomes in patients with IBD.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Module.

PATIENTS

The included patients had IBD and underwent major abdominal surgery between 2016 and 2019. Patients were classified as frail (modified frailty index ≥2), prefrail (modified frailty index = 1), or normal (modified frailty index = 0) based on a validated, 5-factor modified frailty index.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The association was evaluated between frailty and risk of 30-day severe postoperative complications, prolonged hospital stay, and risk of readmission using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 3172 patients with IBD who underwent major abdominal surgery (42.7 ± 16.4 y, 49.3% female, 57.7% with Crohn's disease, 43.9% on biologics), 116 (3.7%) were classified as frail and 477 as prefrail (15%). After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking, BMI, type of surgery, corticosteroid use, and biologic and immunomodulator use, frailty was not associated with increased risk for severe postoperative complications (adjusted OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.81-1.90), mortality (adjusted OR, 1.38 [0.44-3.6]), or 30-day readmission (adjusted OR, 1.35 [0.77-2.30]). Nonelective surgery, significant weight loss, corticosteroid use, and need for ileostomy were associated with increased risk of severe postoperative complications.

LIMITATIONS

Limited information regarding IBD-specific characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with IBD undergoing major abdominal surgery, frailty measured by a conventional abbreviated health deficits index is not predictive of adverse postoperative outcomes. Biologic and functional measures of frailty may better risk-stratify surgical candidacy in patients with IBDs. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C108 .

EL NDICE DE FRAGILIDAD CONVENCIONAL NO PREDICE EL RIESGO DE COMPLICACIONES POSOPERATORIAS EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDADES INFLAMATORIAS DEL INTESTINO UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE MULTICNTRICO

ANTECEDENTES:La fragilidad se ha asociado con resultados adversos en pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino.OBJETIVO:Examinamos la asociación entre la fragilidad definida por déficit de salud (utilizando el índice de fragilidad modificado de 5 factores) y los resultados postoperatorios en pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte prospective.ESCENARIO:Programa Nacional de Mejoramiento de la Calidad Quirúrgica del Colegio Estadounidense de Cirujanos, Módulo de Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino.PACIENTES:Pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias intestinales inscritos en la cohorte que se sometieron a cirugía abdominal mayor entre 2016-19.EXPOSICIÓN:Los pacientes se clasificaron como frágiles (índice de fragilidad modificado ≥2), prefrágiles (índice de fragilidad modificado = 1) o normales (índice de fragilidad modificado = 0) según un índice de fragilidad modificado de 5 factores validado.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Examinamos la asociación entre la fragilidad y el riesgo de complicaciones postoperatorias graves a los 30 días, la estancia hospitalaria prolongada y el riesgo de reingreso, mediante regresión logística multivariable.RESULTADOS:De 3172 pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias intestinales que se sometieron a cirugía abdominal mayor (42,7 ± 16,4 años, 49,3% mujeres, 57,7% con enfermedad de Crohn, 43,9% con biológicos), 116 (3,7%) fueron clasificados como frágiles y 477 como pre- frágil (15%). Después de ajustar por edad, sexo, raza/origen étnico, tabaquismo, índice de masa corporal, tipo de cirugía, uso de corticosteroides, uso de biológicos e inmunomoduladores, la fragilidad no se asoció con un mayor riesgo de complicaciones postoperatorias graves (odds ratio ajustado, 1,24; 95 % de confianza intervalos, 0,81-1,90), mortalidad (odds ratio ajustado, 1,38 [0,44-3,6]) o reingreso a los 30 días (odds ratio ajustado, 1,35 [0,77-2,30]). La cirugía no electiva, la pérdida de peso significativa, el uso de corticosteroides y la necesidad de ileostomía se asociaron con un mayor riesgo de complicaciones posoperatorias graves.LIMITACIONES:Información limitada sobre las características específicas de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.CONCLUSIONES:En pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino sometidos a cirugía abdominal mayor, la fragilidad medida por un índice de déficit de salud abreviado convencional no es predictivo de resultados postoperatorios adversos. Las medidas biológicas y funcionales de fragilidad pueden estratificar mejor la candidatura quirúrgica en pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino. Consulte el Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C108 . (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

National Databases for Assessment of Quality

With the rise in the availability of large health care datasets, database research has become an important tool for colorectal surgeon to assess health care quality and implement practice changes. In this chapter, we will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of database research for quality improvement, review common markers of quality for colorectal surgery, provide an overview of frequently used datasets (including Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program, National Surgical Quality Improvement Project, National Cancer Database, National Inpatient Sample, Medicare Data, and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results), and look ahead to the future of database research for the improvement of quality.

Big Data in Surgery

The emergence of Big Data has been facilitated by technological advancements in the processing, storage, and analysis of large quantities of data. Its strength is derived from its size, ease of access, and speed of analysis, and it has enabled surgeons to investigate areas of interest that traditional research models have historically been unable to address. In the future, Big Data will likely assist in the incorporation of more advanced technologies into surgical practice, including artificial intelligence and machine learning to realize the full potential of Big Data in Surgery.

Venous thromboembolism risk stratification for patients undergoing surgery for IBD using a novel six factor scoring system using NSQIP-IBD registry

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing colorectal surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are recognized to have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to determine the perioperative risk factors for VTE and to create a predictive scoring system for VTE in the IBD cohort.

METHODS

The NSQIP-IBD Collaboration Registry from 2017 to 2020 was used to identify patients. Demographics, operative and outcomes data of IBD patients undergoing surgeries for IBD were analysed. A logistic multivariate regression model was performed using all significant variables to develop a predictive scoring system of VTE.

RESULTS

Five-thousand and three patients (51.9% male, mean age: 42.7, 42.7% ulcerative colitis) were included in the study. 125 (2.49%) developed VTE. On multivariate analysis ASA grade, ulcerative colitis, sepsis, serum sodium <139 mmol/L, an open abdomen and preoperative inter hospital transfer were associated with greater risk of VTE. Using these 6 significant factors, a risk model was constructed. The risk of VTE with one risk factor was 0.7% and 1.8% with two risk factors. The risk of VTE increased to 3.6% and 4.5% with three and four risk factors respectively. With five and six risk factors, the risk of VTE increased exponentially to 10.9% and 25% respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that there are cumulative risk factors which increase the risk of VTE after surgery for IBD. The risk increases exponentially with more than five risk factors, and extended chemoprophylaxis may not be enough in reducing this risk.

Current Perspectives on Indications for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Older Patients

The population of older patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is expected to continue to increase in the coming decades, which necessitates and improved understanding of the critical issues faced by patients in this population. Although restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA remains the surgical procedure of choice for the majority of patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) and UC-related dysplasia, the evidence surrounding surgery for older patients UC remains sparse. In particular, comparisons of outcomes among older and younger patients undergoing IPAA and comparisons between older patients undergoing IPAA and those undergoing proctocolectomy with end ileostomy remain an understudied and important issue, as evidence in this area will be used to guide patient-centered surgical choices among older patients who require colectomy for UC. In this narrative review, we review the available literature regarding IPAA for older patients, as well as the pre-, peri-, and postoperative factors that may influence outcomes in this population.

Contemporary Endovascular 30-Day Outcomes for Critical Limb Threatening Ischemia Relative to Surgical Bypass Grafting

OBJECTIVES

Data from 2011-2014 showed lower extremity bypass(LEB) outperforming infrainguinal endovascular intervention(IEI) regarding major adverse limb events(MALE) but noted no significant difference in major adverse cardiac events(MACE) in propensity matched cohorts. This study aimed to determine if more recent(2015-2018) endovascular outcomes data have improved relative to surgical bypass.

METHODS

Patients who underwent intervention for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) from 2015-2018 were identified using the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program(NSQIP) Vascular Surgery module. The cohort was categorized as undergoing lower extremity bypass(LEB) or infrainguinal endovascular intervention(IEI). Primary 30-day outcomes included major adverse cardiac events(MACE), major adverse limb events(MALE), and major amputation. Inverse probability weighting was used for multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 10,783 patients underwent an infrainguinal intervention for CLTI from 2015-2018. Of these, 6,003(55.7%) underwent LEB and 4,780(44.3%) underwent IEI. Forty percent of the cohort was considered "high anatomic risk" by Objective Performance Goals(OPG) standards, and 13.6% were considered "high clinical risk." The IEI cohort vs. the LEB cohort experienced a Myocardial infarction(MI)/Stroke rate of 1.8% vs. 3.6%(p < .001), and had a mortality rate of 2.0% vs. 1.7%(p = .22), which yielded a composite MACE of 3.4% vs. 4.8%(p = .001). The rate of reintervention for IEI vs LEB was 4.4% vs. 5.3%(p = .04), the loss of patency (without re-intervention) rate was 1.8% vs. 1.8%(p = 1.0), and the major amputation rate was 4.1% vs. 3.5%(p = .15), which resulted in a MALE rate of 9.1% vs. 8.8%(p = .50). Following inverse probability weighting, comparing the IEI to the referent LEB, MALE AOR = 1.17, 95% CI[1.01 -1.36], p = .036, MACE AOR = 0.61, 95% CI[0.49-0.74], p < .001, and major amputation AOR = 1.31, 95% CI[1.05 -1.62], p = .016.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular outcomes continue to demonstrate inferiority in major amputation and overall MALE. However, endovascular intervention has a significantly reduced incidence of MACE. Overall, these results demonstrate an improvement in endovascular MACE rates in recent years relative to surgical bypass.

Surgical Resection for Crohn's and Cancer: A Comparison of Disease-Specific Risk Factors and Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to compare disease-specific risk factors and 30-day outcomes between patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and colon cancer (CC) undergoing right-sided surgical resection.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP®) was interrogated to extract all patients ≥18 years undergoing elective right-sided resection for CD versus CC. Independent risk factors for surgical complications were identified through multivariable logistic regression for both groups. In a second step, surgical and medical 30-day morbidity was compared after risk adjustment.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 17,516 patients, of which 2,899 (16.6%) underwent surgery for CD versus 14,617 (83.4%) for CC. Independent risk factors for surgical complications in patients with CD were male gender, African American race, ASA score (III or IV), active smoking, prolonged surgery, and preoperative anemia. Independent risk factors for surgical complications in the cancer group were age ≥70 years, male gender, ASA score (III or IV), respiratory and cardiovascular comorbidities, and preoperative hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL). After risk adjustment, surgical complications (OR 1.25, p = 0.002), sepsis (OR 1.64, p = 0.012), and unplanned readmissions (OR 1.39, p = 0.004) were more common in patients with CD. Thirty-day mortality was higher in cancer patients (1.1 vs. 0.1%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Crohn's disease were more prone to surgical complications and postoperative sepsis compared to the cancer group undergoing the same procedure. Careful evaluation and correction of disease-specific modifiable risk factors of patients with CD and CC, respectively, are important.

Perioperative outcomes for carotid revascularization on asymptomatic dialysis-dependent patients meet Society for Vascular Society guidelines

OBJECTIVE

The current Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines recommend carotid revascularization for asymptomatic disease in patients with at least a 3-year life expectancy and stenosis >60% when the expected perioperative stroke and death rate is <3%. Based on this recommendation, it was previously determined that asymptomatic patients who require dialysis would not meet the perioperative stroke and death thresholds nor the long-term survival benchmarks to justify carotid surgery. To determine whether carotid surgery for patients requiring dialysis is appropriate, the present study compared the perioperative outcomes after carotid revascularization for dialysis-dependent patients relative to nondialysis patients in a contemporary, national cohort.

METHODS

The targeted vascular module from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify patients who undergone carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting for asymptomatic carotid disease from 2011 to 2018. The cohort was categorized as requiring or not requiring dialysis. The primary 30-day outcomes included mortality and the composite of stroke/death and stroke/death/myocardial infarction (MI). Univariate analyses were performed using the Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Multivariable analyses were used to assess the independent associations of the estimated glomerular filtration rate and dialysis dependence with the stroke/death rate.

RESULTS

A total of 17,579 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 226 (1.3%) required dialysis at revascularization. No difference was found in the degree of severe stenosis (80%-99%) demonstrated by 69% of the dialysis cohort and 72% of the nondialysis cohort (P = .9). Of the dialysis and nondialysis cohorts, 5% and 3.6% underwent carotid artery stenting (P = .3). The dialysis-dependent patients were younger (68 vs 71 years; P < .001) and were more likely to have insulin-dependent diabetes (47% vs 12%; P < .001), congestive heart failure (8.4% vs 1.4%; P < .001), and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (15% vs 10%; P = .03). In the dialysis and nondialysis cohort, 2 (0.9%) and 88 (0.5%) patients died (P = .3); 4 (1.8%) and 247 (1.4%) experienced strokes (P = .6); and 3 (1.3%) and 185 (1.1%) patients experienced MI (P = .5), respectively. The composite outcomes of stroke/death and stroke/death/MI was 2.2% (n = 5) and 1.8% (n = 319; P = .6) and 3.5% (n = 8) and 2.8% (n = 479; P = .4) in the dialysis and nondialysis cohorts, respectively. After multivariable analysis, neither the estimated glomerular filtration rate (adjusted odds ratio, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01; P = .26) nor dialysis dependence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-1.57; P = .13) was independently associated with the composite outcome of stroke/death.

CONCLUSIONS

The 30-day carotid revascularization outcomes for asymptomatic disease in dialysis-dependent patients met the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines in this national cohort and might be better than previously surmised. Hence, vascular surgeons could consider carotid revascularization for select dialysis-dependent patients with the appropriate expected longevity and perioperative risk.

Ileostomy reversal after subtotal colectomy in Crohn's disease: a single institutional experience at a high-volume center

PURPOSE

Our aim was to evaluate factors leading to ostomy reversal among a group of 44 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who underwent subtotal colectomy (STC) between June 2011 and September 2018.

METHODS

Our study design was a retrospective chart review. Patients with CD who underwent STC were included. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate several risk factors for non-reversal including medications received prior to surgery and indication for STC.

RESULTS

Of 44 STCs performed, 31 (70.5%) were completed laparoscopically and 13 required an open approach (29.5%). Nine patients (20.4%) underwent ostomy reversal, and the mean time to reversal was 8.4 months. Preoperative therapy with an immunomodulator or biologic was associated with ostomy reversal (OR and CI: 0.43, 0.09-0.93; 0.47, 0.10-0.96), as was a diagnosis of intraabdominal abscess (0.43, 0.09-0.93).

CONCLUSION

Ileostomy reversal after STC in Crohn's disease is uncommon. Certain treatment regimens and diagnostic factors may impact the likelihood of ostomy reversal. Based on the available data, patients with CD whose disease is severe enough to require STC should be counseled that their ostomy will most likely be permanent. However, due to the low incidence of this procedure for CD, more data is needed.

Contemporary Endovascular Outcomes for Critical Limb Ischemia Are Still Failing to Meet Society for Vascular Surgery Objective Performance Goals

OBJECTIVES

The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) created Objective Performance Goals (OPGs) for critical limb ischemia (CLI) in 2009. It was previously shown that endovascular therapy for CLI was not meeting these benchmarks. The OPG for all peripheral interventions is <8% for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), <8% for major adverse limb events (MALE), and <3% for major amputation. The goal of this study is to evaluate if outcomes have improved for CLI in recent years, specifically 2015-2018.

METHODS

The Targeted Vascular Module from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was queried to identify patients who underwent endovascular intervention for critical limb ischemia from 2011-2018. Cohorts were divided into 2011-2014 and 2015-2018. Primary 30-day outcomes were MACE, MALE, and major amputation. Univariate analyses were performed using the Fisher's exact test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Multivariate analysis comparing groups was performed using inverse probability weights and trend over time analysis was performed using logistic regression with year of intervention as a continuous variable.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2018, 7,168 patients underwent an endovascular intervention for CLI. 28% were classified as "OPG high anatomic risk," and 17% were classified as "OPG high clinical risk." The 2015-2018 cohort vs. the 2011-14 cohort experienced MACE in 3.3% vs. 2.7% (p = .23), MALE in 9.1% vs. 8.9% (p = 0.83), and amputation in 4.0% vs. 4.2% (p = 0.71). When only high anatomic risk patients were considered (n = 1988), MACE was experienced in 2.4% vs. 2.2% (p = 0.87), MALE by 9.5% vs. 10.6% (p = 0.47) and amputation by 5.1% vs. 6.0% (p = 0.40). When only high clinical risk patients were considered (n = 1224), MACE was experienced in 5.2% vs. 3.9% (p = 0.33), MALE by 8.0% vs. 7.4% (p = 0.74) and amputation by 3.9% vs. 3.7% (p = 0.88). Comparing 2015-2018 to the reference 2011-2014, MALE adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.99, 95% CI [0.83-1.18], MACE AOR = 1.19 95% CI [0.88-1.60], and major amputation AOR = 0.91 95% CI [0.70-1.17]. There were no decreases in the trend over time for MALE (AOR per year 0.97, CI [.94-1.02], major amputation (AOR per year: 0.97, CI [0.91-1.03], nor for MACE (AOR per year: 1.05, CI [.98-1.13]).

CONCLUSION

Outcomes following endovascular interventions for CLI continue to underperform when compared to OPG benchmarks for MALE and amputations. There is no decrease over time for these target outcomes. Target MACE events remain acceptable despite the increasing clinical complexity of patients being treated.

Modified two-stage restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational research

PURPOSE

Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) is performed for patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). This operation is performed in 2 or 3 stages and involves forming a diverting loop ileostomy thought to protect patients from complications related to anastomotic leak. However, some advocate for a modified 2-stage approach, consisting of subtotal colectomy followed by completion proctectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis without diverting ileostomy. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing postoperative complication rates between modified 2-stage and traditional RPC with ileal pouch anal anastomosis.

METHODS

Records were sourced from PubMed/Embase databases. Studies comparing postoperative complications following RPC for ulcerative colitis (UC) were selected according to PRISMA guidelines comparing modified 2-stage (exposure), classic 2-stage, and 3-stage approaches (comparators). The primary outcome measure was safety as measured by postoperative complication rates. We employed random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We included ten observational studies including 1727 patients (38% modified 2-stage). Among pediatric patients, modified 2-stage approaches had higher rates of anastomotic leak than 3-stage approaches (p = 0.03). Among adult cohorts with lower preoperative biologic use rates, modified 2-stage approaches had lower leak rates than classic 2-stage approaches (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified 2-stage approach may be safe for adult patients who otherwise require a 3-stage approach while reducing costs and length of stay. Pediatric patients may benefit from lower leak rates when receiving 3-stage compared with modified 2-stage approaches, especially when on biologics. The modified 2-stage approach may be safer than the classic 2-stage approach for adult patients with lower biologic exposure.

Unplanned readmissions after endovascular intervention or surgical bypass for critical limb ischemia

OBJECTIVE

After surgery or other interventions, unplanned readmissions are associated with poor outcomes and drain health care resources. Patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) are at particularly high risk of readmission, and readmissions result in increased health care costs. The primary aims of the study were to discover and compare the 30-day readmission rates of patients who underwent lower extremity surgical bypass (LEB) and endovascular infrainguinal endovascular intervention (IEI) for CLI and to evaluate the relationship between unplanned readmissions likely related to the primary procedure for IEI compared with LEB.

METHODS

The Targeted Vascular Module from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify all infrainguinal LEB or IEI for CLI from 2015 to 2018. Those who were not eligible for the primary outcome of interest were excluded. The primary 30-day outcome was unplanned readmission. Univariate analyses for primary and secondary outcomes were performed using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum testing. Multivariate analysis was performed using inverse probability weighting and independent risk factors for readmission were identified with logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were 12,873 patients who met inclusion criteria. In the LEB cohort, there were 7270 (56.5%) patients, and in the IEI cohort, there were 5603 (43.5%) patients. Thirty percent (n = 1696) of the IEI cohort underwent a tibial intervention, and 49% (n = 3547) underwent a distal bypass. The IEI cohort was more likely to be high physiologic risk (P < .001) and to present with tissue loss (P < .001), whereas the LEB cohort was more likely to have high anatomic risk features (P < .001) and be performed under emergent conditions (P < .001). After multivariable analysis, LEB was found to be independently predictive for both unplanned readmissions due to any cause (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.51; P < .001) and procedure-related unplanned interventions (adjusted odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-2.11; P < .001). Independent predictors of readmission were LEB, preoperative sepsis, severe chronic kidney disease, dependent functional status, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, high-risk physiologic features, African American race, preoperative steroid use, history of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and preoperative tissue loss.

CONCLUSIONS

LEB is independently associated with unplanned readmission from all causes and from procedure-related causes after adjusting for the measured confounders. More research is required to determine the economic burden of these readmissions.

Better characterization of operation for ulcerative colitis through the National surgical quality improvement program: A 2-year audit of NSQIP-IBD

INTRODUCTION

There is little consensus of quality measurements for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis(RPC-IPAA) performed for ulcerative colitis(UC). The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program(NSQIP) cannot accurately classify RPC-IPAA staged approaches. We formed an IBD-surgery registry that added IBD-specific variables to NSQIP to study these staged approaches in greater detail.

METHODS

We queried our validated database of IBD surgeries across 11 sites in the US from March 2017 to March 2019, containing general NSQIP and IBD-specific perioperative variables. We classified cases into delayed versus immediate pouch construction and looked for independent predictors of pouch delay and postoperative Clavien-Dindo complication severity.

RESULTS

430 patients received index surgery or completed pouches. Among completed pouches, 46(28%) and 118(72%) were immediate and delayed pouches, respectively. Significant predictors for delayed pouch surgery included higher UC surgery volume(p = 0.01) and absence of colonic dysplasia(p = 0.04). Delayed pouch formation did not significantly predict complication severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data allows improved classification of complex operations. Curating disease-specific variables allows for better analysis of predictors of delayed versus immediate pouch construction and postoperative complication severity.

SHORT SUMMARY

We applied our previously validated novel NSIP-IBD database for classifying complex, multi-stage surgical approaches for UC to a degree that was not possible prior to our collaborative effort. From this, we describe predictive factors for delayed pouch formation in UC RPC-IPAA with the largest multicenter effort to date.