Continuous infusion versus intermittent administration of meropenem in critically ill patients

Reprint of: Does two-step infusion improve the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics target attainment of meropenem in critically Ill patients?

The optimal method for administering meropenem remains controversial. This study was conducted to explore the optimal two-step infusion strategy (TIT), and to investigate whether TIT is superior to intermittent infusion therapy (IIT) and prolonged infusion therapy (PIT). A physiologically based pharmacokinetics model for critically ill patients was established and evaluated. The validated model was utilized to evaluate the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target attainment of meropenem. The PK/PD target attainment of different TITs varied greatly, and the total infusion duration and the first-step dose greatly affected these values. The optimal TIT was 0.25 g (30 min) + 0.75 g (150 min) at MICs of ≤2 mg/L, and 0.25 g (45 min) + 0.75 g (255 min) at MICs of 4-8 mg/L. The PK/PD target attainment of optimal TIT, PIT, and IIT were 100 % at MICs of ≤1 mg/L. When MIC increased to 2-8 mg/L, the PK/PD target attainment of optimal TIT was similar to that of PIT and higher than IIT. In conclusion, TIT did not significantly improve the PK/PD target attainment of meropenem compared with PIT. IIT is adequate at MICs of ≤1 mg/L, and PIT may be the optimal meropenem infusion method in critically ill patients with MICs of 2-8 mg/L.

Does Two-Step Infusion Improve the Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Target Attainment of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients?

The optimal method for administering meropenem remains controversial. This study was conducted to explore the optimal two-step infusion strategy (TIT), and to investigate whether TIT is superior to intermittent infusion therapy (IIT) and prolonged infusion therapy (PIT). A physiologically based pharmacokinetics model for critically ill patients was established and evaluated. The validated model was utilized to evaluate the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target attainment of meropenem. The PK/PD target attainment of different TITs varied greatly, and the total infusion duration and the first-step dose greatly affected these values. The optimal TIT was 0.25 g (30 min) + 0.75 g (150 min) at MICs of ≤2 mg/L, and 0.25 g (45 min) + 0.75 g (255 min) at MICs of 4-8 mg/L. The PK/PD target attainment of optimal TIT, PIT, and IIT were 100 % at MICs of ≤1 mg/L. When MIC increased to 2-8 mg/L, the PK/PD target attainment of optimal TIT was similar to that of PIT and higher than IIT. In conclusion, TIT did not significantly improve the PK/PD target attainment of meropenem compared with PIT. IIT is adequate at MICs of ≤1 mg/L, and PIT may be the optimal meropenem infusion method in critically ill patients with MICs of 2-8 mg/L.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of meropenem in critically ill patients

This study aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model (PBPK/PD) of meropenem for critically ill patients. A PBPK model of meropenem in healthy adults was established using PK-Sim software and subsequently extrapolated to critically ill patients based on anatomic and physiological parameters. The mean fold error (MFE) and geometric mean fold error (GMFE) methods were used to compare the differences between predicted and observed values of pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-∞, and CL to evaluate the accuracy of the PBPK model. The model was verified using meropenem plasma samples obtained from Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, which were determined by HPLC-MS/MS. After that, the PBPK model was combined with a PKPD model, which was developed based on f%T > MIC. Monte Carlo simulation was utilized to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) in patients. The developed PBPK model successfully predicted the meropenem disposition in critically ill patients, wherein the MFE average and GMFE of all predicted PK parameters were within the 1.25-fold error range. The therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of meropenem was conducted with 92 blood samples from 31 ICU patients, of which 71 (77.17%) blood samples were consistent with the simulated value. The TDM results showed that meropenem PBPK modeling is well simulated in critically ill patients. Monte Carlo simulations showed that extended infusion and frequent administration were necessary to achieve curative effect for critically ill patients, whereas excessive infusion time (> 4 h) was unnecessary. The PBPK/PD modeling incorporating literature and prospective study data can predict meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients correctly. Our study provides a reference for dose adjustment in critically ill patients.

Vaborbactam increases meropenem susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates displaying MexXY and AmpC upregulation

To evaluate the resistance mechanisms among Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates exhibiting meropenem (MEM) MIC values higher than meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV). P. aeruginosa clinical isolates collected in US hospitals from 2014 to 2019 were susceptibility tested. Whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing were performed. Results were analyzed for strain typing, acquired β-lactamases, and mutations in chromosomal genes; gene expression was measured for known β-lactam resistance contributors. Results were compared to a control group of 10 P. aeruginosa isolates displaying MIC values at 8 mg/L for meropenem ± vaborbactam (MEM = MEV). Out of 88 isolates displaying MEM > MEV, 33 (37.5%) isolates had reproducibly lower MIC values for meropenem-vaborbactam compared to meropenem when retested. The expression of mexX, mexY, mexZ, and ampC was significantly greater among a higher percentage of the MEM > MEV isolates. Furthermore, the association of mexXY and ampC overexpression was detected in 17/33 MEM > MEV isolates and only 1/10 MEM = MEV isolate. In addition, the Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase amino acid substitution R79Q was detected among 33.3% of the isolates displaying MEM > MEV, and none of the isolates displayed MEM = MEV. Other resistance mechanisms were not observed or were equally observed in both groups. In rare cases, vaborbactam plays a role in lowering the meropenem MIC values in P. aeruginosa clinical isolates likely due to the inhibition of the AmpC gene that was overexpressed in the presence of upregulation of MexXY with or without alterations in the AmpC gene. IMPORTANCE Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates are intrinsically resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents and meropenem is an important therapeutic option to treat infections caused by this organism. Meropenem-vaborbactam activity is similar to that of meropenem alone against P. aeruginosa isolates. Isolates belonging to this species that display lower meropenem-vaborbactam compared to meropenem are rare. We initiated this study to understand the resistance mechanisms that could lead to lower meropenem-vaborbactam MIC values when compared to meropenem alone. We documented that isolates displaying lower meropenem-vaborbactam exhibited overexpression of MexXY and AmpC. In addition, isolates displaying the R79Q PDC (AmpC) mutation were more likely to display lower meropenem-vaborbactam when compared to isolates displaying the same MIC values for these agents.

Extended and Continuous Infusion of Novel Protected β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Narrative Review

Consolidated data from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies support the administration of β-lactam antibiotics in prolonged infusion (i.e., extended or continuous) to optimize therapeutic efficacy by increasing the probability of attaining maximal bactericidal activity. This is the longest possible time during which the free drug concentrations are approximately four-fold the minimum inhibitory concentration between dosing intervals. In the context of antimicrobial stewardship strategies, achieving aggressive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets is an important tool in the management of multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial infections and in the attainment of mutant preventing concentrations. However, prolonged infusion remains an unexploited resource. Novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (βL/βLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam) have been released in recent years to face the emerging challenge of MDR Gram-negative bacteria. Pre-clinical and real-life evidence has confirmed the promising role of prolonged infusion of these molecules in specific settings and clinical populations. In this narrative review we have summarized available pharmacological and clinical data, future perspectives, and current limitations of prolonged infusion of the novel protected β-lactams, their application in hospital settings and in the context of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics: narrative review of systematic reviews, and implications for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy

INTRODUCTION

Continuous infusion (CI) of beta-lactam antibiotics may be of benefit in some patients, particularly those with severe infections. However, most studies have been small and conflicting results have been reported. The best available evidence on clinical outcomes of beta-lactam CI comes from systematic reviews/meta-analyses that integrate the available data.

AREAS COVERED

A search of PubMed from inception to the end of February 2022 for systematic reviews of clinical outcomes with beta-lactam CI for any indication identified 12 reviews, all of which focused on hospitalized patients, most of whom were critically ill. A narrative overview of these systematic reviews/meta-analyses is provided. No systematic reviews evaluating the use of beta-lactam CI for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) were identified, as few studies have focused on this area. Relevant data are summarized, and consideration is given to issues that need to be addressed when using beta-lactam CI in the setting of OPAT.

EXPERT OPINION

Evidence from systematic reviews supports a role for beta-lactam CI in the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe/life-threatening infections. Beta-lactam CI can play a role in patients receiving OPAT for severe chronic/difficult-to-treat infections, but additional data are needed to clarify its optimal use.

Optimization of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs Using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics Protocols: A Cost-Benefit Review

PURPOSE

Antimicrobial stewardship programs are important for reducing antimicrobial resistance because they can readjust antibiotic prescriptions to local guidelines, switch intravenous to oral administration, and reduce hospitalization times. Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) empirically based prescriptions and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) programs are essential for antimicrobial stewardship, but there is a need to fit protocols according to cost benefits. The cost benefits can be demonstrated by reducing toxicity and hospital stay, decreasing the amount of drug used per day, and preventing relapses in infection. Our aim was to review the data available on whether PK-PD empirically based prescriptions and TDM could improve the cost benefits of an antimicrobial stewardship program to decrease global hospital expenditures.

METHODS

A narrative review based on PubMed search with the relevant studies of vancomycin, aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, and voriconazole.

RESULTS

TDM protocols demonstrated important cost benefit for patients treated with vancomycin, aminoglycosides, and voriconazole mainly due to reduce toxicities and decreasing the hospital length of stay. In addition, PK-PD strategies that used infusion modifications to meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, and cefepime, such as extended or continuous infusion, demonstrated important cost benefits, mainly due to reducing daily drug needs and lengths of hospital stays.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM protocols and PK-PD empirically based prescriptions improve the cost-benefits and decrease the global hospital expenditures.

The clinical and paraclinical effectiveness of four-hour infusion vs. half-hour infusion of high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam in treatment of critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock: An assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to determine whether critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis and septic shock may benefit from extended infusion of ampicillin/sulbactam compared with those receiving intermittent infusion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This randomized assessor-blinded clinical trial was conducted in the ICUs of Nemazee and Shahid Rajaee hospital, Shiraz, Iran, from August 2019 to August 2021. The participants randomly received 9 g Ampicillin/Sulbactam every 8 h by either extended (infused over 4 h) or intermittent (infused over 30 min) intravenous infusion if their estimated glomerular filtration rate based on Cockrorft-Gault formula was higher than 60 ml/min.

RESULTS

Totally, 136 patients were enrolled and allocated to the intervention and control groups, each with 68 patients. Clinical cure was significantly higher in the extended group (P = 0.039), but ICU and hospital length of stay did not differ between the groups (P = 0.87 and 0.83, respectively). The ICU (P = 0.031) and hospital (P = 0.037) mortality rates in the extended infusion group were significantly lower than those in the intermittent infusion group.

CONCLUSION

These data should be replicated in larger clinical trials before providing any recommendation in favor of this method of administration in clinical practice.

Meropenem plus Ceftaroline Is Active against Enterococcus faecalis in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model Using Humanized Dosing Simulations

The standard of care for serious Enterococcus faecalis infections is ampicillin plus ceftriaxone. Ampicillin's inconvenient dosing schedule, drug instability, allergy potential, along with ceftriaxone's high risk for Clostridioides difficile infection and its promotion of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), led our team to explore alternative options. This work aimed to understand the role of carbapenems in combination with cephalosporins in these infections. We selected two ampicillin and penicillin susceptible E. faecalis strains (AMP-MIC 0.5-2 μg/mL; PCN-MIC 2 μg/mL) and simulated human therapeutic dosing regimens in a 48-h in vitro pharmacodynamic model (IVPD) with ampicillin (2g q4h), ertapenem (1g q24h), meropenem (2g q8h), ceftriaxone (2g q12h), and ceftaroline (600 mg q8h). As expected, ampicillin plus ceftriaxone demonstrated enhanced activity compared with ampicillin monotherapy with no MIC increases in either isolate. Meropenem and ceftaroline demonstrated significant kill against both isolates, with no regrowth or MIC increases occurring. Meropenem plus ceftriaxone also demonstrated significant kill, and while no MIC increases were identified for meropenem, there was minor regrowth and larger standard deviations. Ertapenem combined with either ceftriaxone or ceftaroline enhanced activity at 24 h, but at 48 h, regrowth occurred, and ertapenem MIC increases were noted. Meropenem-based combination therapy against E. faecalis may provide clinicians with another regimen to treat severe E. faecalis infections. Meropenem plus ceftaroline was as active as the standard of care treatment (ampicillin plus ceftriaxone) and may serve as an alternative for serious E. faecalis infections. Further studies are warranted to determine the clinical efficacy.

A dosing nomograph for cerebrospinal fluid penetration of meropenem applied by continuous infusion in patients with nosocomial ventriculitis

OBJECTIVES

In difficult to treat infections such as nosocomial ventriculitis, meropenem exposure in the infected compartment is often uncertain but crucial for antibacterial effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration of meropenem in patients with nosocomial ventriculitis and to derive a nomograph to predict effective meropenem doses as a function of clinical parameters.

METHODS

Retrospective patient data including meropenem serum and CSF levels, as well as CSF inflammation markers were analysed using NONMEM® to assess the general pharmacokinetics and CSF penetration. Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) were used to evaluate different meropenem dosing regimens. Probability of target attainment (PTA) in CSF was assessed and a nomograph to achieve a target concentration of 4 mg/L was developed.

RESULTS

A one-compartment model with meropenem clearance dependent on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI eGFR, p< 5 e-10) best described meropenem serum pharmacokinetics of 51 critically ill patients. CSF penetration ratio was correlated with the amount of protein in CSF (p< 1 e-8), with higher CSF protein levels accounting for higher penetration ratios. Preserved renal function (CKD-EPI GFR> 50 ml/min/1.73 m²) as well as low CSF protein levels (<500 mg/L) resulted in 80 % PTA (100 %fT>_2xMIC) for a meropenem dose of 6 g/24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

High interindividual variability in meropenem CSF concentration was observed in patients with nosocomial ventriculitis. A nomograph to predict the daily meropenem dose required for target attainment for a given eGFR and CSF protein count was developed.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Optimization of Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Challenges and Strategies

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are correlated with high mortality rates worldwide. Thus, the administration of antibiotic therapy with appropriate dosing regimen is critical. An efficient antibiotic is needed to maintain an adequate concentration at the infection site, for a sufficient period of time, to achieve the best therapeutic outcome. It can, however, be challenging for antibiotics to penetrate the pulmonary system due to the complexity of its structure. Crossing the blood alveolar barrier is a difficult process determined by multiple factors that are either drug related or infection related. Thus, the understanding of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of antibiotics identifies the optimum dosing regimens to achieve drug penetration into the epithelial lining fluid at adequate therapeutic concentrations. Critically ill patients in the ICU can express augmented renal clearance (ARC), characterized by enhanced renal function, or may have renal dysfunction necessitating supportive care such as continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Both ARC and CRRT can alter drug elimination, thus affecting drug concentrations. PK of critically ill patients is less clear due to the multiple variabilities associated with their condition. Therefore, conventional dosing regimens often lead to therapeutic failure. Another major hurdle faced in optimizing treatment for HAP/VAP is the reduction of the in vitro potency. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), if available, may allow health care providers to personalize treatment to maximize efficacy of the drug exposures while minimizing toxicity. TDM can be of significant importance in populations whom PK are less defined and for resistant infections to achieve the best therapeutic outcome.

Impact of Maximizing Css/MIC Ratio on Efficacy of Continuous Infusion Meropenem Against Documented Gram-Negative Infections in Critically Ill Patients and Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis to Support Treatment Optimization

Introduction: optimal treatment of Gram-negative infections in critically ill patients is challenged by changing pathophysiological conditions, reduced antimicrobial susceptibility and limited therapeutic options. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of maximizing Css/MIC ratio on efficacy of continuous infusion (CI) meropenem in treating documented Gram-negative infections in critically ill patients and to perform a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis to support treatment optimization.

Materials and Methods: Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to identify whether a cutoff of steady-state meropenem concentration (Css)-to-minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (Css/MIC) ratio correlated with favorable clinical outcome. A non-parametric approach with Pmetrics was used for pharmacokinetic analysis and covariate evaluation. The probability of target attainment (PTA) of the identified Css/MIC ratio was calculated by means of Monte Carlo simulations. Cumulative fraction of response (CFRs) were calculated against common Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii as well.

Results: a total of 74 patients with 183 meropenem Css were included. CART analysis identified a Css/MIC ratio ≥4.63 as cutoff value significantly associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed the association [OR (95%CI): 20.440 (2.063–202.522); p < 0.01]. Creatinine clearance (CL_CR) was the only covariate associated with meropenem clearance. Monte Carlo simulations showed that, across different classes of renal function, dosages of meropenem ranging between 0.5 and 2 g q6h over 6 h (namely by CI) may grant PTAs of Css/MIC ratios ≥4.63 against susceptible pathogens with an MIC up to the EUCAST clinical breakpoint of 2 mg/L. The CFRs achievable with these dosages were very high (>90%) against Enterobacterales across all the classes of renal function and against P. aeruginosa among patients with CL_CR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m², and quite lower against A. baumannii.

Discussion: our findings suggest that Css/MIC ratio ≥4.63 may be considered the pharmacodynamic target useful at maximizing the efficacy of CI meropenem in the treatment of Gram-negative infections in critically ill patients. Dosages ranging between 0.5 g q6h and 2 g q6h by CI may maximize the probability of favorable clinical outcome against meropenem-susceptible Gram-negative pathogens among critically ill patients having different degrees of renal function.

Clinical and pharmacokinetic/dynamic outcomes of prolonged infusions of beta-lactam antimicrobials: An overview of systematic reviews

OBJECTIVE

This overview of reviews aims to map and compare of objectives, methods, and findings of existing systematic reviews to develop a greater understanding of the information available about prolonged beta-lactam infusions in hospitalized patients with infection.

DESIGN

Overview of systematic reviews.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, PROSPERO and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from January, 1990 to June, 2019 using a peer reviewed search strategy. Grey literature was also searched for relevant reviews.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING REVIEWS

Systematic reviews were sought that compared two or more infusion strategies for intravenous beta-lactam antimicrobials and report clinical cure or mortality. Populations of included reviews were restricted to hospitalized patients with infection, without restrictions on age, infection type, or disease.

DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS

Abstract screening, data extraction, quality and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. Overlap between reviews was assessed using a modified corrected covered area. Overview findings are reported in accordance with Cochrane's recommendation for overview conduct. Clinical outcomes extracted included survival, clinical cure, treatment failure, microbiological cure, length of stay, adverse events, cost, and emergence of resistance.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 3327 unique citations from which 21 eligible reviews were included. Reviews varied by population, intervention and outcomes studied. Between reviews, overlap of primary studies was generally high, methodologic quality generally low and risk of bias variable. Nine of 14 reviews that quantitatively evaluated mortality and clinical cure identified a benefit with prolonged infusions of beta lactams when compared with intermittent infusions. Evidence of mortality and clinical cure benefit was greater among critically ill patients when compared to less sick patients and lower in randomized controlled trials when compared with observational studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from our review demonstrate a consistent and reproducible lack of harm with prolonged infusions of beta-lactam antibiotics with variability in effect size and significance of benefits. Despite 21 systematic reviews addressing prolonged infusions of beta-lactams, this overview supports the continued need for a definitive systematic review given variability in populations, interventions and outcomes in the current systematic reviews. Subsequent systematic reviews should have more rigorous and transparent methods, only include RCTs and evaluate the proposed benefits found in various subgroup-analyses-i.e. high risk of mortality.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospero registry, CRD42019117118.

Population pharmacokinetics and evaluation of the predictive performance of pharmacokinetic models in critically ill patients receiving continuous infusion meropenem: a comparison of eight pharmacokinetic models

Background

Several population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models for meropenem dosing in ICU patients are available. It is not known to what extent these models can predict meropenem concentrations in an independent validation dataset when meropenem is infused continuously.

Patients and methods

A PopPK model was developed with concentration-time data collected from routine care of 21 ICU patients (38 samples) receiving continuous infusion meropenem. The predictability of this model and seven other published PopPK models was studied using an independent dataset that consisted of 47 ICU patients (161 samples) receiving continuous infusion meropenem. A statistical comparison of imprecision (mean square prediction error) and bias (mean prediction error) was conducted.

Results

A one-compartment model with linear elimination and creatinine clearance as a covariate of clearance best described our data. The mean ± SD parameter estimate for CL was 9.89 ± 3.71 L/h. The estimated volume of distribution was 48.1 L. The different PopPK models showed a bias in predicting serum concentrations from the validation dataset that ranged from -8.76 to 7.06 mg/L. Imprecision ranged from 9.90 to 42.1 mg/L.

Conclusions

Published PopPK models for meropenem vary considerably in their predictive performance when validated in an external dataset of ICU patients receiving continuous infusion meropenem. It is necessary to validate PopPK models in a target population before implementing them in a therapeutic drug monitoring program aimed at optimizing meropenem dosing.

Calculated initial parenteral treatment of bacterial infections: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

This is the third chapter of the guideline "Calculated initial parenteral treatment of bacterial infections in adults - update 2018" in the 2nd updated version. The German guideline by the Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie e.V. (PEG) has been translated to address an international audience. The chapter features the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties of the most frequently used antiinfective agents.

Novel Cassette Assay To Quantify the Outer Membrane Permeability of Five β-Lactams Simultaneously in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae

Poor penetration through the outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria is a major barrier of antibiotic development. While β-lactam antibiotics are commonly used against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae, there are limited data on OM permeability especially in K. pneumoniae Here, we developed a novel cassette assay, which can simultaneously quantify the OM permeability to five β-lactams in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae Both clinical isolates harbored a blaKPC-2 and several other β-lactamases. The OM permeability of each antibiotic was studied separately ("discrete assay") and simultaneously ("cassette assay") by determining the degradation of extracellular β-lactam concentrations via multiplex liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analyses. Our K. pneumoniae isolate was polymyxin resistant, whereas the E. cloacae was polymyxin susceptible. Imipenem penetrated the OM at least 7-fold faster than meropenem for both isolates. Imipenem penetrated E. cloacae at least 258-fold faster and K. pneumoniae 150-fold faster compared to aztreonam, cefepime, and ceftazidime. For our β-lactams, OM permeability was substantially higher in the E. cloacae compared to the K. pneumoniae isolate (except for aztreonam). This correlated with a higher OmpC porin production in E. cloacae, as determined by proteomics. The cassette and discrete assays showed comparable results, suggesting limited or no competition during influx through OM porins. This cassette assay allowed us, for the first time, to efficiently quantify the OM permeability of multiple β-lactams in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae Characterizing the OM permeability presents a critical contribution to combating the antimicrobial resistance crisis and enables us to rationally optimize the use of β-lactam antibiotics.IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial resistance is causing a global human health crisis and is affecting all antibiotic classes. While β-lactams have been commonly used against susceptible isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae, carbapenem-resistant isolates are spreading worldwide and pose substantial clinical challenges. Rapid penetration of β-lactams leads to high drug concentrations at their periplasmic target sites, allowing β-lactams to more completely inactivate their target receptors. Despite this, there are limited tangible data on the permeability of β-lactams through the outer membranes of many Gram-negative pathogens. This study presents a novel, cassette assay, which can simultaneously characterize the permeability of five β-lactams in multidrug-resistant clinical isolates. We show that carbapenems, and especially imipenem, penetrate the outer membrane of K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae substantially faster than noncarbapenem β-lactams. The ability to efficiently characterize the outer membrane permeability is critical to optimize the use of β-lactams and combat carbapenem-resistant isolates.

Impact of anticancer chemotherapy on the extension of beta-lactamase spectrum: an example with KPC-type carbapenemase activity towards ceftazidime-avibactam

Through their action on DNA replication, anticancer chemotherapies could increase the basal mutation rate in bacteria and increase the risk of selecting antibiotic resistant mutants. We investigated the impact of several drugs on a beta-lactamase model using KPC-type carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. We studied the impact of anticancer chemotherapies used in pediatric hematologic malignancies on 7 clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae producing KPC-type carbapenemases. We compared the mutation rates from cultures with/without chemotherapy on ceftazidime-avibactam, rifampicin and ceftazidime-avibactam combined with meropenem media. Mechanisms of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance were explored on a subset of mutants. After exposure to some cytotoxic molecules, the bacterial mutation rates leading to ceftazidime-avibactam and to rifampicin resistance increased up to 104-fold while we observed no emergence of resistant mutants (frequency of <10-10) on a meropenem combined with ceftazidime-avibactam media. Compared to the parental strains, an increased susceptibility to meropenem was observed in the ceftazidime-avibactam resistant mutants. The blaKPC genes of ceftazidime-avibactam mutants harbored either mutations, deletions or insertions, especially in the region encoding the Ω-loop of the KPC-type carbapenemase. Anticancer chemotherapy can increase the mutation rates of bacteria accelerating the extension of KPC-type carbapenemases towards ceftazidime-avibactam, one of the last resort antimicrobial chemotherapy.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of 3-h extended infusion of meropenem in adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: implications for empirical therapy against Gram-negative bacteria

Background

Optimal anti-bacterial activity of meropenem requires maintenance of its plasma concentration (Cp) above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen for at least 40% of the dosing interval (fT > MIC > 40). We aimed to determine whether a 3-h extended infusion (EI) of meropenem achieves fT > MIC > 40 on the first and third days of therapy in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. We also simulated the performance of the EI with respect to other pharmacokinetic (PK) targets such as fT > 4 × MIC > 40, fT > MIC = 100, and fT > 4 × MIC = 100.

Methods

Arterial blood samples of 25 adults with severe sepsis or septic shock receiving meropenem 1000 mg as a 3-h EI eight hourly (Q8H) were obtained at various intervals during and after the first and seventh doses. Plasma meropenem concentrations were determined using a reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography assay, followed by modeling and simulation of PK data. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) definitions of MIC breakpoints for sensitive and resistant Gram-negative bacteria were used.

Results

A 3-h EI of meropenem 1000 mg Q8H achieved fT > 2 µg/mL > 40 on the first and third days, providing activity against sensitive strains of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. However, it failed to achieve fT > 4 µg/mL > 40 to provide activity against strains susceptible to increased exposure in 33.3 and 39.1% patients on the first and the third days, respectively. Modeling and simulation showed that a bolus dose of 500 mg followed by 3-h EI of meropenem 1500 mg Q8H will achieve this target. A bolus of 500 mg followed by an infusion of 2000 mg would be required to achieve fT > 8 µg > 40. Targets of fT > 4 µg/mL = 100 and fT > 8 µg/mL = 100 may be achievable in two-thirds of patients by increasing the frequency of dosing to six hourly (Q6H).

Conclusions

In patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, EI of 1000 mg of meropenem over 3 h administered Q8H is inadequate to provide activity (fT > 4 µg/mL > 40) against strains susceptible to increased exposure, which requires a bolus of 500 mg followed by EI of 1500 mg Q8H. While fT > 8 µg/mL > 40 require escalation of EI dose, fT > 4 µg/mL = 100 and fT > 8 µg/mL = 100 require escalation of both EI dose and frequency.

Development of a dosing nomogram for continuous-infusion meropenem in critically ill patients based on a validated population pharmacokinetic model

Background

Optimal antibiotic exposure is a vital but challenging prerequisite for achieving clinical success in ICU patients.

Objectives

To develop and externally validate a population pharmacokinetic model for continuous-infusion meropenem in critically ill patients and to establish a nomogram based on a routinely available marker of renal function.

Methods

A population pharmacokinetic model was developed in NONMEM® 7.3 based on steady-state meropenem concentrations (CSS) collected during therapeutic drug monitoring. Different serum creatinine-based markers of renal function were compared for their influence on meropenem clearance (the Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance CLCRCG, the CLCR bedside estimate according to Jelliffe, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation and the four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation). After validation of the pharmacokinetic model with independent data, a dosing nomogram was developed, relating renal function to the daily doses required to achieve selected target concentrations (4/8/16 mg/L) in 90% of the patients. Probability of target attainment was determined for efficacy (CSS ≥8 mg/L) and potentially increased likelihood of adverse drug reactions (CSS >32 mg/L).

Results

In total, 433 plasma concentrations (3.20-48.0 mg/L) from 195 patients (median/P0.05 - P0.95 at baseline: weight 77.0/55.0-114 kg, CLCRCG 63.0/19.6-168 mL/min) were used for model building. We found that CLCRCG best described meropenem clearance (CL = 7.71 L/h, CLCRCG = 80 mL/min). The developed model was successfully validated with external data (n = 171, 73 patients). According to the nomogram, daily doses of 910/1480/2050/2800/3940 mg were required to reach a target CSS = 8 mg/L in 90% of patients with CLCRCG = 20/50/80/120/180 mL/min, respectively. A low probability of adverse drug reactions (<0.5%) was associated with these doses.

Conclusions

A dosing nomogram was developed for continuous-infusion meropenem based on renal function in a critically ill population.

Scaling beta-lactam antimicrobial pharmacokinetics from early life to old age

AIMS

Beta-lactam dose optimization in critical care is a current priority. We aimed to review the pharmacokinetics (PK) of three commonly used beta-lactams (amoxicillin ± clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem) to compare PK parameters reported in critically and noncritically ill neonates, children and adults, and to investigate whether allometric and maturation scaling principles could be applied to describe changes in PK parameters through life.

METHODS

A systematic review of PK studies of the three drugs was undertaken using MEDLINE and EMBASE. PK parameters and summary statistics were extracted and scaled using allometric principles to 70 kg individual for comparison. Pooled data were used to model clearance maturation and decline using a sigmoidal (Hill) function.

RESULTS

A total of 130 papers were identified. Age ranged from 29 weeks to 82 years and weight from 0.9-200 kg. PK parameters from critically ill populations were reported with wider confidence intervals than those in healthy volunteers, indicating greater PK variability in critical illness. The standard allometric size and sigmoidal maturation model adequately described increasing clearance in neonates, and a sigmoidal model was also used to describe decline in older age. Adult weight-adjusted clearance was achieved at approximately 2 years postmenstrual age. Changes in volume of distribution were well described by the standard allometric model, although amoxicillin data suggested a relatively higher volume of distribution in neonates.

CONCLUSIONS

Critical illness is associated with greater PK variability than in healthy volunteers. The maturation models presented will be useful for optimizing beta-lactam dosing, although a prospective, age-inclusive study is warranted for external validation.

Single-Center Pharmacokinetic Study and Simulation of a Low Meropenem Concentration in Brain-Dead Organ Donors

Meropenem is an ultrabroad-spectrum antibiotic of the carbapenem family. In brain-dead organ donors, administration of standard meropenem dosages does not reach therapeutic levels. Our objectives were to determine the plasma concentration of meropenem after the administration of standard meropenem dose and to estimate an improved dosage regimen for these patients. One gram of meropenem was administered as a 1-h infusion every 8 h for 1 to 3 days, and blood samples were collected. The plasma concentration of meropenem was measured and subjected to pharmacokinetic analysis. Simcyp simulation was performed to predict the optimum plasma levels and dosage based on the patients' individual pharmacokinetic parameters. The maximum plasma concentration of meropenem was 3.29 μg/ml, which was lower than four times the MIC of 8 μg/ml. Although the mean creatinine clearance of patients was moderately low (67.5 ml/min), the apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) and time-averaged total body clearance (CL) of meropenem were markedly elevated (4.97 liters/kg and 2.06 liters/h/kg, respectively), owing to massive fluid loading to decrease the high sodium levels and to treat shock or dehydration. The simulation revealed that dose and infusion time of meropenem should be increased based on patients' Vss and CL, and a loading dose is recommended to reach rapidly the target concentration. In conclusion, a standard meropenem regimen is insufficient to achieve optimal drug levels in brain-dead patients, and an increase in dose and extended or continuous infusion with intravenous bolus administration of a loading dose are recommended for these patients.

Stability of Meropenem After Reconstitution for Administration by Prolonged Infusion

Objective: Meropenem is a parenteral carbapenem antibiotic which has a broad spectrum of activity against aerobes and anaerobes. Meropenem's bactericidal activity is determined by the time during which meropenem concentration remains above the minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) during the dosing interval. Thus, prolonged infusion is the optimal way to maximize the time-dependant activity. However, studies to date have shown that carbapenems and in particular, meropenem, are relatively unstable in solution. The aims of this study were therefore (1) to establish the effects of temperature on the concentration of a generic brand reconstituted meropenem solution and (2) to determine whether 24-hour continuous infusion is possible without concentrations dropping below the recommended 90%. Method: Preliminary examination was carried out by the means of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Meropenem was subsequently assayed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The method was developed and validated in compliance with International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines. Meropenem's stability was examined at two temperatures 22°C and 33°C to mimic average and high temperature in hospital wards. Solutions were prepared aseptically at the clinically relevant concentration. Results: NMR results obtained showed an increase in open ring methyl groups peak intensity, indicating that meropenem begins to degrade upon dissolution (d=1.05 and 1.25). Results obtained from quantitative HPLC confirm that meropenem concentrations dropped to 90% of initial concentration at 7.4 hours and 5.7 hours at 22°C and 33°C, respectively. Conclusion: Although results obtained indicate that meropenem should not be continuously infused over 24 hours, it is possible that meropenem could be continuously infused for at least 7 hours if temperature does not exceed 22°C and for 5 hours if temperature does not exceed 33°C.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Efficacies of Continuous versus Intermittent Administration of Meropenem in Patients with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study

Background:

The antibiotic meropenem is commonly administered in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. We compared the pharmacokinetic, clinical, and bacteriological efficacies of continuous infusion of meropenem versus intermittent administration in such patients.

Methods:

Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with severe sepsis or septic shock who received meropenem were randomly assigned to either the continuous (n = 25) or intermittent groups (n = 25). The continuous group received a loading dose of 0.5 g of meropenem followed by a continuous infusion of 3 g/day; the intermittent group received an initial dose of 1.5 g followed by 1 g for every 8 h. Clinical success, microbiological eradication, superinfection, ICU mortality, length of ICU stay, and duration of meropenem treatment were assessed. Serial plasma meropenem concentrations for the first and third dosing periods (steady state) were also measured.

Results:

Clinical success was similar in both the continuous (64%) and intermittent (56%) groups (P = 0.564); the rates of microbiological eradication and superinfection (81.8% vs. 66.7% [P = 0.255] and 4% vs. 16% [P = 0.157], respectively) showed improvement in the continuous group. The duration of meropenem treatment was significantly shorter in the continuous group (7.6 vs. 9.4 days; P = 0.035), where a better steady-state concentration was also achieved. Peak and trough concentrations were significantly different between the continuous and intermittent groups both in the first (Cmax: 19.8 mg/L vs. 51.8 mg/L, P = 0.000; Cmin: 11.2 mg/L vs. 0.5 mg/L, P = 0.000) and third dosing periods (Cmax: 12.5 mg/L vs. 46.4 mg/L, P = 0.000; Cmin: 11.4 mg/L vs. 0.6 mg/L, P = 0.000). For medium-susceptibility pathogens, continuous infusion concentrations above the minimal inhibitory concentration were 100%, which was better than that in the intermittent group.

Conclusions:

Continuous infusion of meropenem provides significantly shorter treatment duration and a tendency for superior bacteriological efficacy than intermittent administration. Continuous infusion may be more optimal against intermediate-susceptibility pathogens.

Continuous and Prolonged Intravenous β-Lactam Dosing: Implications for the Clinical Laboratory

Beta-lactam antibiotics serve as a cornerstone in the management of bacterial infections because of their wide spectrum of activity and low toxicity. Since resistance rates among bacteria are continuously on the rise and the pipeline for new antibiotics does not meet this trend, an optimization of current beta-lactam treatment is needed. This review provides an overview of optimization through use of prolonged- and continuous-infusion dosing strategies compared with more traditional intermittent infusions. Included is an overview of the scientific basis for using these nontraditional prolonged- and continuous-infusion-based regimens, with a focus on major areas in which the clinical laboratory can support the clinical use of these regimens.

Comparison of Short Versus Prolonged Infusion of Standard Dose of Meropenem Against Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates in Different Patient Groups: A Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Approach

Dose optimization is required to increase carbapenem's efficacy against carbapenemase-producing isolates. Four clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were used: one susceptible to meropenem with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 0.031 mg/L and 3 verona integron-borne metallo bete-lactamase-1-producing isolates with MICs 8, 16, and 128 mg/L. The human pharmacokinetics of short (0.5-h) and prolonged (3-h) infusion regimens of 1 g meropenem every 8 h were simulated in an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. Time-kill curves were constructed for each isolate and dosing regimen, and the %T > MIC associated with maximal bactericidal activity was estimated. The percentage of pharmacodynamic target attainment for isolates with different MICs was calculated for 350 ICU, surgical, and internal medicine patients. The isolates with MIC ≤8 mg/L were killed with both dosing regimens. The %T > MIC corresponding to maximal bactericidal activity was ∼40%. The percentages of target attainment were >90%, 61%-83%, 23%-33%, and <3% with the short infusion regimen and >90%, 98%-99%, 55%-79%, and <5% with the prolonged infusion regimen for isolates with MIC ≤2, 4, 8, and ≥16 mg/L, respectively. The lowest target attainment rates were observed for the ICU patients and the highest for internal medicine patients. The prolonged infusion regimen was more effective than the short infusion regimen against isolates with MIC 4-8 mg/L.

Meropenem by Continuous Versus Intermittent Infusion in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia due to Gram-Negative Bacilli

Background:

It is known that β-lactam antibiotics exhibit time-dependent bactericidal activity. Several studies have found continuous infusion of meropenem more effective than intermittent infusion in maintaining constant serum concentrations in excess of the minimum inhibitory concentration. However, limited data exist on the clinical efficacy of meropenem administered by continuous infusion.

Objective:

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of continuous versus intermittent infusion of meropenem for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to gram-negative bacilli.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients with VAP caused by gram-negative bacilli who received initial empiric antibiotic therapy with meropenem. We analyzed 2 contemporary cohorts: one group received meropenem by continuous infusion (1 g over 360 min every 6 h), the other by intermittent infusion (1 g over 30 min every 6 h). The administration method was prescribed according to the physician's discretion. Patients received meropenem plus tobramycin for 14 days.

Results:

There were no significant differences between patient groups with regard to gender, age, APACHE-II at intensive care unit admission, diagnosis, microorganism responsible for VAP, or organ dysfunction severity at the time VAP was suspected. The group receiving medication by continuous infusion showed a greater clinical cure rate than the group treated with intermittent infusion (38 of 42, 90.47%, vs 28 of 47, 59.57%, respectively, with OR 6.44 [95% Cl 1.97 to 21.05; p < 0.001]).

Conclusions:

Meropenem administered by continuous infusion may have more clinical efficacy than intermittent infusion.

Cerebrospinal fluid penetration of meropenem in neurocritical care patients with proven or suspected ventriculitis: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Ventriculitis is a complication of temporary intraventricular drains. The limited penetration of meropenem into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is well known. However, ventricular CSF pharmacokinetic data in patients with ventriculitis are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate meropenem pharmacokinetics in the serum and CSF of neurocritical care patients with proven or suspected ventriculitis.

METHODS

We conducted an observational pharmacokinetic study of neurocritical care patients with proven or suspected ventriculitis receiving meropenem. Multiple blood and CSF samples were taken and were described using nonparametric pharmacokinetic modelling with Pmetrics.

RESULTS

In total, 21 patients (median age 52 years, median weight 76 kg) were included. The median (range) of peak and trough concentrations in serum were 20.16 (4.40-69.00) mg/L and 2.54 (0.00-31.40) mg/L, respectively. The corresponding peak and trough concentrations in CSF were 1.20 (0.00-6.20) mg/L and 1.28 (0.00-4.10) mg/L, respectively, with a median CSF/serum ratio (range) of 0.09 (0.03-0.16). Median creatinine clearance ranged from 60.7 to 217.6 ml/minute (median 122.5 ml/minute). A three-compartment linear population pharmacokinetic model was most appropriate. No covariate relationships could be supported for any of the model parameters. Meropenem demonstrated poor penetration into CSF, with a median CSF/serum ratio of 9 % and high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of higher-than-standard doses of meropenem and therapeutic drug monitoring in both serum and CSF should be considered to individualise meropenem dosing in neurocritical care patients with ventriculitis.

Population pharmacokinetics and probability of target attainment of meropenem in critically ill patients

PURPOSE

Patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with Klebsiella pneumoniae infections are characterized by high mortality. The aims of the present study were to investigate the population pharmacokinetics parameters and to assess the probability of target attainment of meropenem in critically ill patients to provide information for more effective regimens.

METHODS

Twenty-seven consecutive patients were included in the study. Meropenem was administered as 3-h intravenous (i.v.) infusions at doses of 1-2 g every 8 or 12 h. Meropenem plasma concentrations were measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, and a population pharmacokinetics analysis was performed using NONMEM software. Meropenem plasma disposition was simulated for extended (3 h; 5 h) or continuous i.v. infusions, and the following parameters were calculated: time during which free drug concentrations were above minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (fT > MIC), free minimum plasma concentrations above 4× MIC (fCmin > 4× MIC), probability of target attainment (PTA), and cumulative fraction of response (CFR).

RESULTS

Gender and severity of sepsis affected meropenem clearance, whose typical population values ranged from 6.22 up to 12.04 L/h (mean ± standard deviation (SD) value, 9.38 ± 4.47 L/h). Mean C min value was 7.90 ± 7.91 mg/L, suggesting a high interindividual variability. The simulation confirmed that 88 and 97.5 % of patients achieved effective C min > 4× MIC values after 3- and 5-h i.v. infusions of meropenem 2 g × 3/day, respectively. On the contrary, the same total daily doses reached the target C min > 4× MIC values in 100 % of patients when administered as continuous i.v. infusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Several factors may influence meropenem pharmacokinetics in ICU patients. Continuous i.v. infusions of meropenem seem to be more effective than standard regimens to achieve optimal therapeutic targets.

Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem during continuous infusion in surgical ICU patients

Continuous infusion of meropenem is a candidate strategy for optimization of its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile. However, plasma concentrations are difficult to predict in critically ill patients. Steady-state concentrations of meropenem were determined prospectively during continuous infusion in 32 surgical ICU patients (aged 21-85 years, body weight 55-125 kg, APACHE II 5-29, measured creatinine clearance 22.7-297 mL/min). Urine was collected for the quantification of renal clearance of meropenem and creatinine. Cystatin C was measured as an additional marker of renal function. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed using NONMEM(®) , which described total meropenem clearance and its relationship with several estimates of renal function (measured creatinine clearance CLCR , Cockcroft-Gault formula CLCG , Hoek formula, 1/plasma creatinine, 1/plasma cystatin C) and other patient characteristics. Any estimate of renal function improved the model performance. The strongest association of clearance was found with CLCR (typical clearance = 11.3 L/h × [1 + 0.00932 × (CLCR  - 80 mL/min)]), followed by 1/plasma cystatin C; CLCG was the least predictive covariate. Neither age, weight, nor sex was found to be significant. These models can be used to predict dosing requirements or meropenem concentrations during continuous infusion. The covariate CLCR offers the best predictive performance; if not available, cystatin C may provide a promising alternative to plasma creatinine.

Clinical outcomes with alternative dosing strategies for piperacillin/tazobactam: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

A better dosing strategy can improve clinical outcomes for patients. We sought to compare the extended or continuous infusion with conventional intermittent infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam, investigating which approach is better and worthy of recommendation for clinical use.

Methods

Articles were gathered from PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, Science Direct, Cochrane, two Chinese literature databases (CNKI, Wan Fang Data) and related ICAAC and ACCP conferences. Randomized controlled and observational studies that compared extended or continuous infusion with conventional intermittent infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam were identified from the databases above and analyzed. Two reviewers independently extracted and investigated the data. A meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.2 software. The quality of each study was assessed. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were evaluated.

Results

Five randomized controlled trials and nine observational studies were included in this study. All included studies had high quality and no publication bias was found. Compared to the conventional intermittent infusion approach, the extended or continuous infusion group had a significantly higher clinical cure rate (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.29-2.73, P = 0.0009) and a lower mortality rate (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.89, P = 0.005). No statistical difference was observed for bacteriologic cure (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.82-2.37, P = 0.22) between the two dosing regimens. The sensitivity analysis showed the results were stable.

Conclusions

Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that the extended or continuous infusion strategy of piperacillin/tazobactam should be recommended for clinical use considering its higher clinical cure rate and lower mortality rate in comparison with conventional intermittent strategy. Data from this study could be extrapolated for other β-lactam antimicrobials. Therefore, this dosing strategy could be considered in clinical practice.

Modelled target attainment after meropenem infusion in patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia: the PROMESSE study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to propose an optimal treatment regimen of meropenem in critically ill patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 55 patients in intensive care treated with 1 g of meropenem every 8 h for severe nosocomial pneumonia, 30 were assigned to intermittent infusion (II; over 0.5 h) and 25 to extended infusion (EI; over 3 h) groups. Based on plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations determined at steady-state, pharmacokinetic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations were undertaken to assess the probability of attaining drug concentrations above the MIC for 40%-100% of the time between doses (%T > 1-fold and 4-fold MIC), for 1 or 2 g administered by either method.

RESULTS

Penetration ratio, measured by the ELF/plasma ratio of AUCs, was statistically higher in the EI group than in the II group (mean ± SEM: 0.29 ± 0.030 versus 0.20 ± 0.033, P = 0.047). Considering a maximum susceptibility breakpoint of 2 mg/L, all dosages and modes of infusions achieved 40%-100% T > 1-fold MIC in plasma, but none did so in ELF, and only the 2 g dose over EI achieved 40%-100% T > 4-fold MIC in plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimum regimen to treat severe nosocomial pneumonia was 2 g of meropenem infused over 3 h every 8 h. This regimen achieved the highest pharmacodynamic targets both in plasma and in ELF.

Influence of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of antibacterials in their dosing regimen selection

The choice of antimicrobial dosing in clinical practice in the past was based upon a 'penicillin mentality', that is, on the assumption that the in vivo antimicrobial efficacy is dependent on the duration of drug levels above the minimum inhibitory concentration of target microorganisms. Really, a rational antimicrobial therapy is strongly related to a basic understanding of the influence the patient has on the antibiotic (pharmacokinetics [PKs]) and the patient's response to the specific drug effects (pharmacodynamics [PDs]). PK/PD parameters are essential in facilitating the translation of microbiological activity into clinical situations, ensuring a successful outcome. This review will analyze the typical patterns of antimicrobial activity and the corresponding PK/PD parameters, with a special focus on a PK/PD dosing approach with the most commonly utilized antimicrobial agent classes.

Optimal dosing of antibiotics in critically ill patients by using continuous/extended infusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

The aim of this study was to determine whether using pharmacodynamic-based dosing of antimicrobials, such as extended/continuous infusions, in critically ill patients is associated with improved outcomes as compared with traditional dosing methods.

Methods

We searched Medline, HealthStar, EMBASE, Cochrane Clinical Trial Registry, and CINAHL from inception to September 2013 without language restrictions for studies comparing the use of extended/continuous infusions with traditional dosing. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data on methodology and outcomes, and performed quality assessment. Meta-analyses were performed by using random-effects models.

Results

Of 1,319 citations, 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 782 patients) and 13 cohort studies (n = 2,117 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with traditional non-pharmacodynamic-based dosing, RCTs of continuous/extended infusions significantly reduced clinical failure rates (relative risk (RR) 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 0.94, P = 0.02) and intensive care unit length of stay (mean difference, −1.5; 95% CI, −2.8 to −0.2 days, P = 0.02), but not mortality (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.19; P = 0.38). No significant between-trial heterogeneity was found for these analyses (I² = 0). Reduced mortality rates almost achieved statistical significance when the results of all included studies (RCTs and cohort studies) were pooled (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.00; P = 0.054).

Conclusions

Pooled results from small RCTs suggest reduced clinical failure rates and intensive care unit length-of-stay when using continuous/extended infusions of antibiotics in critically ill patients. Reduced mortality rates almost achieved statistical significance when the results of RCTs were combined with cohort studies. These results support the conduct of adequately powered RCTs to define better the utility of continuous/extended infusions in the era of antibiotic resistance.

Comparative Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Doripenem and Meropenem in Obese Patients

Background: Antimicrobial pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data are limited in obesity. Objective: To evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doripenem and meropenem in obese patients hospitalized on a general ward. Methods: Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m2 or total body weight (TBW) ≥100 pounds over their ideal body weight randomly received doripenem 500 mg (1-hour infusion) or meropenem 1 g (0.5-hour infusion) every 8 hours. Differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by unpaired t test. Monte Carlo simulations were performed for 500 mg and 1 g every 8 hours, infused over 1 and 4 hours for doripenem and 0.5 and 3 hours for meropenem. Probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated using a pharmacodynamic target of 40% fT > MIC (free drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC]), and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was calculated using MIC data for 8 Gram-negative pathogens. Results: Twenty patients were studied. Volume of distribution at steady state, corrected for TBW, was significantly larger (0.18 ± 0.04 vs 0.13 ± 0.05 L/kg, P = .048) and systemic clearance was significantly faster for doripenem (11.7 ± 4.1 vs 8.1 ± 2.6 L/h, P = .03). PTA was >90% for all regimens at MICs ≤2 µg/mL. CFR was >90% for all regimens against 6 enteric Gram-negative pathogens and for 3 of 4 regimens for each drug against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Conclusions: Doripenem and meropenem pharmacokinetics differ in obesity. However, currently approved dosing regimens provide adequate pharmacodynamic exposures for susceptible bacteria in obese patients.

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with severe infections

BACKGROUND

Meropenem is an effective β-lactam antibiotic that is frequently used to treat serious infections in both intensive care unit (ICU) and febrile neutropenic hematology/oncology (Hem/Onc) patients. Studies suggest that to be effective, meropenem concentrations must be maintained above the inhibitory concentrations for the majority of a dosing interval. However, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem seem to differ in critically ill patients compared with healthy or less ill subjects used to select labeled dosing regimens.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to investigate meropenem PK in critically ill patients and to see how often standard dosing regimens produced adequate plasma concentrations. A secondary objective was to investigate how achieved concentrations were related to outcomes (morbidity and mortality) in these patients.

METHODS

Meropenem plasma concentrations over time were measured using a high pressure liquid chromatography assay in febrile Hem/Onc and ICU patients who were treated with standard meropenem dosing schedules. Outcomes such as fever control and survival were assessed in these patients and compared with individual meropenem PK data and with recommended target concentrations.

RESULTS

A total of 25 subjects including 10 febrile Hem/Onc and 15 ICU patients with a variety of serious illnesses and baseline renal function were studied. Mean peak concentrations were less variable than were pre-dose concentrations. Post peak and trough concentrations were often below recommended minimum inhibitory concentrations. Both clearance and volumes of distribution were greater than reported in less ill subjects, only in part explained by increased renal clearance. Therefore, serum concentrations often did not exceed recommended concentration targets even for moderately sensitive organisms. Inadequate concentrations were especially common in the mostly ill, febrile neutropenic Hem/Onc subjects and seemed to explain at least some therapeutic failures. Conversely, drug accumulation occurred in ICU subjects with decreased renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard meropenem dosing regimens were inadequate in many critically ill febrile, neutropenic Hem/Onc, and septic ICU patients. These data suggest a role for meropenem concentration monitoring in such patients.

Drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion considerations in critically ill adults

INTRODUCTION

All critically ill patients require medication to treat organ dysfunction. However, the pharmacokinetics of drugs used to treat these patients is complex due to frequent alterations in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME).

AREAS COVERED

This review examines pharmacokinetic aspects of drug administration for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Specifically, the authors examine the ADME changes that occur and which should be considered by clinicians when delivering drug therapy to critically ill patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Dosage pharmacokinetics determined from single-dose or limited-duration administration studies in healthy volunteers may not apply to critically ill patients. Organ dysfunction among these patients may be due to pre-existing disease or the effects of a systemic or locoregional inflammatory response precipitated by their illness. Alterations in pharmacokinetics observed among the critically ill include altered bioavailability after enteral administration, increased volume of distribution and blood-brain barrier permeability and changes in P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 enzyme function. However, the effect of these changes on clinically important outcomes remains uncertain and poorly studied. Future investigations should examine not only pharmacokinetic changes among the critically ill, but also whether recognition of these changes and alterations in drug therapy directed as a consequence of their observation alters patient outcomes.

Continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of severe acute infections

BACKGROUND

Intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics are indicated for the treatment of severe infections. However, the emergence of infections caused by multi-drug resistant organisms in conjunction with a lack of novel antibiotics has prompted the investigation of alternative dosing strategies to improve clinical efficacy and tolerability. To optimise pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic antibiotic parameters, continuous antibiotic infusions have been compared to traditional intermittent antibiotic infusions.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of continuous intravenous administration of concentration-dependent and time-dependent antibiotics to traditional intermittent intravenous administration in adults with severe acute bacterial infections.

SEARCH METHODS

The following electronic databases were searched in September 2012: The Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP), CINAHL, ISI Web of Science: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), ISI Web of Science: Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S). The reference lists of all relevant material, the Internet and the trials registry www.clinicaltrials.gov for completed and ongoing trials were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials in adults with a bacterial infection requiring intravenous antibiotic therapy comparing continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics were included. Both time-dependent and concentration-dependent antibiotics were considered.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three independent authors performed data extraction for the included studies. All data was cross-checked and disagreements resolved by consensus. An intention to treat analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria with a combined total of over 1,600 patients. The majority of included studies were judged to be at unclear or high risk of bias with regard to randomisation sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, management of incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other potential threats to validity. No studies were judged to be at low risk of bias for all methodological quality items assessed. There were no differences in all-cause mortality (n=1241, RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.67 - 1.20, p=0.45), infection recurrence (n=398, RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.35 - 4.19, p=0.76), clinical cure (n=975, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93 - 1.08, p=0.98), and superinfection post-therapy (n=813, RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.60 - 1.94, p=0.79). There were no differences in safety outcomes including adverse events (n=575, RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94 - 1.12, p=0.63), serious adverse events (n=871, RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.80 - 2.30, p=0.26), and withdrawal due to adverse events (n=871, RR 2.03, 95% CI 0.52 - 7.95, p=0.31). A difference was observed in the subgroup analyses of clinical cure in septic versus non-septic patients, where intermittent antibiotic infusions were favoured for clinical cure in septic patients. However, this effect was not consistent between random-effects and fixed-effects analyses. No differences were found in sensitivity analyses conducted.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in mortality, infection recurrence, clinical cure, superinfection post-therapy, and safety outcomes when comparing continuous infusions of intravenous antibiotics to traditional intermittent infusions of antibiotics. However, the wide confidence intervals suggest that beneficial or harmful effects cannot be ruled out for all outcomes. Therefore, the current evidence is insufficient to recommend the widespread adoption of continuous infusion antibiotics in the place of intermittent infusions of antibiotics. Further large prospective randomised trials, with consistent and complete reporting of clinical outcome measures, conducted with concurrent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in special populations are required to determine whether adoption of continuous antibiotic infusions is warranted in specific circumstances.

Does Beta-lactam Pharmacokinetic Variability in Critically Ill Patients Justify Therapeutic Drug Monitoring? A Systematic Review

The pharmacokinetics of beta-lactam antibiotics in intensive care patients may be profoundly altered due to the dynamic, unpredictable pathophysiological changes that occur in critical illness. For many drugs, significant increases in the volume of distribution and/or variability in drug clearance are common. When “standard” beta-lactam doses are used, such pharmacokinetic changes can result in subtherapeutic plasma concentrations, treatment failure, and the development of antibiotic resistance. Emerging data support the use of beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and individualized dosing to ensure the achievement of pharmacodynamic targets associated with rapid bacterial killing and optimal clinical outcomes. The purpose of this work was to describe the pharmacokinetic variability of beta-lactams in the critically ill and to discuss the potential utility of TDM to optimize antibiotic therapy through a structured literature review of all relevant publications between 1946 and October 2011. Only a few studies have reported the utility of TDM as a tool to improve beta-lactam dosing in critically ill patients. Moreover, there is little agreement between studies on the pharmacodynamic targets required to optimize antibiotic therapy. The impact of TDM on important clinical outcomes also remains to be established. Whereas TDM may be theoretically rational, clinical studies to assess utility in the clinical setting are urgently required.

Short versus long infusion of meropenem in very-low-birth-weight neonates

Prolonged infusion of meropenem has been suggested in studies with population pharmacokinetic modeling but has not been tested in neonates. We compared the steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem given as a short (30-min) or prolonged (4-h) infusion to very-low-birth-weight (gestational age, <32 weeks; birth weight, <1,200 g) neonates to define the appropriate dosing regimen for a phase 3 efficacy study. Short (n = 9) or prolonged (n = 10) infusions of meropenem were given at a dose of 20 mg/kg every 12 h. Immediately before and 0.5, 1.5, 4, 8, and 12 h after the 4th to 7th doses of meropenem, blood samples were collected. Meropenem concentrations were measured by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography. PK analysis was performed with WinNonlin software, and modeling was performed with NONMEM software. A short infusion resulted in a higher mean drug concentration in serum (C(max)) than a prolonged infusion (89 versus 54 mg/liter). In all but two patients in the prolonged-infusion group, the free serum drug concentration was above the MIC (2 mg/liter) 100% of the time. Meropenem clearance (CL) was not influenced by postnatal or postmenstrual age. In population PK analysis, a one-compartment model provided the best fit and the steady-state distribution volume (V(ss)) was scaled with body weight and CL with a published renal maturation function. The covariates serum creatinine and postnatal and gestational ages did not improve the model fit. The final parameter estimates were a V(ss) of 0.301 liter/kg and a CL of 0.061 liter/h/kg. Meropenem infusions of 30 min are acceptable as they balance a reasonably high C(max) with convenience of dosing. In very-low-birth-weight neonates, no dosing adjustment is needed over the first month of life.

Antibiotics in critically ill patients: a systematic review of the pharmacokinetics of β-lactams

INTRODUCTION

Several reports have shown marked heterogeneity of antibiotic pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients admitted to ICUs, which might potentially affect outcomes. Therefore, the pharmacodynamic (PD) parameter of the efficacy of β-lactam antibiotics, that is, the time that its concentration is above the bacteria minimal inhibitory concentration (T > MIC), cannot be safely extrapolated from data derived from the PK of healthy volunteers.

METHODS

We performed a full review of published studies addressing the PK of intravenous β-lactam antibiotics given to infected ICU patients. Study selection comprised a comprehensive bibliographic search of the PubMed database and bibliographic references in relevant reviews from January 1966 to December 2010. We selected only English-language articles reporting studies addressing β-lactam antibiotics that had been described in at least five previously published studies. Studies of the PK of patients undergoing renal replacement therapy were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 57 studies addressing six different β-lactam antibiotics (meropenem, imipenem, piperacillin, cefpirome, cefepime and ceftazidime) were selected. Significant PK heterogeneity was noted, with a broad, more than twofold variation both of volume of distribution and of drug clearance (Cl). The correlation of antibiotic Cl with creatinine clearance was usually reported. Consequently, in ICU patients, β-lactam antibiotic half-life and T > MIC were virtually unpredictable, especially in those patients with normal renal function. A better PD profile was usually obtained by prolonged or even continuous infusion. Tissue penetration was also found to be compromised in critically ill patients with septic shock.

CONCLUSIONS

The PK of β-lactam antibiotics are heterogeneous and largely unpredictable in ICU patients. Consequently, the dosing of antibiotics should be supported by PK concepts, including data derived from studies of the PK of ICU patients and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Optimizing antimicrobial therapy in sepsis and septic shock

Every patient with sepsis and septic shock must be evaluated thoroughly at presentation before the initiation of antibiotic therapy. However, in most situations, an abridged initial assessment focusing on critical diagnostic and management planning elements is sufficient. Intravenous antibiotics should be administered as early as possible, and always within the first hour of recognizing severe sepsis and septic shock. Broad-spectrum antibiotics must be selected with one or more agents active against likely bacterial or fungal pathogens and with good penetration into the presumed source. Antimicrobial therapy should be reevaluated daily to optimize efficacy, prevent resistance, avoid toxicity, and minimize costs. Consider combination therapy in Pseudomonas infections, and combination empiric therapy in neutropenic patients. Combination therapy should be continued for no more than 3 to 5 days and de-escalation should occur following availability of susceptibilities. The duration of antibiotic therapy typically is limited to 7 to 10 days; longer duration is considered if response is slow, if there is inadequate surgical source control, or in the case of immunologic deficiencies. Antimicrobial therapy should be stopped if infection is not considered the etiologic factor for a shock state.

Recommended β-lactam regimens are inadequate in septic patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy

Introduction

Sepsis is responsible for important alterations in the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), which is commonly used in septic patients, may further contribute to pharmacokinetic changes. Current recommendations for antibiotic doses during CRRT combine data obtained from heterogeneous patient populations in which different CRRT devices and techniques have been used. We studied whether these recommendations met optimal pharmacokinetic criteria for broad-spectrum antibiotic levels in septic shock patients undergoing CRRT.

Methods

This open, prospective study enrolled consecutive patients treated with CRRT and receiving either meropenem (MEM), piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), cefepime (FEP) or ceftazidime (CAZ). Serum concentrations of these antibiotics were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography from samples taken before (t = 0) and 1, 2, 5, and 6 or 12 hours (depending on the β-lactam regimen) after the administration of each antibiotic. Series of measurements were separated into those taken during the early phase (< 48 hours from the first dose) of therapy and those taken later (> 48 hours).

Results

A total of 69 series of serum samples were obtained in 53 patients (MEM, n = 17; TZP, n = 16; FEP, n = 8; CAZ, n = 12). Serum concentrations remained above four times the minimal inhibitory concentration for Pseudomonas spp. for the recommended time in 81% of patients treated with MEM, in 71% with TZP, in 53% with CAZ and in 0% with FEP. Accumulation after 48 hours of treatment was significant only for MEM.

Conclusions

In septic patients receiving CRRT, recommended doses of β-lactams for Pseudomonas aeruginosa are adequate for MEM but not for TZP, FEP and CAZ; for these latter drugs, higher doses and/or extended infusions should be used to optimise serum concentrations.

Efficacy of carbapenems against a metallo-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolate in a rabbit intra-abdominal abscess model

BACKGROUND

Although metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) hydrolyse most β-lactams, including carbapenems, MBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae very often remain susceptible to carbapenems in vitro. We studied the in vivo efficacy of imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem and aztreonam against a carbapenem-susceptible MBL-producing clinical Escherichia coli strain in a rabbit intra-abdominal abscess model.

METHODS

Rabbits were inoculated intraperitoneally with 10(8) cfu/mL of VIM-1-positive E. coli and were assigned to receive no treatment (controls) or intravenous imipenem/cilastatin (imipenem) 70 mg/kg/12 h or meropenem 125 mg/kg/12 h or ertapenem 60 mg/kg/12 h or aztreonam 70 mg/kg/12 h. Dosing regimens were chosen on the basis of preliminary pharmacokinetic studies so that T(>MIC) was achieved for ≥50% of the dosing interval for all tested antibiotics. A total of eight doses were administered before sacrifice and the abscesses were harvested and quantitatively cultured.

RESULTS

MICs of imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem and aztreonam for the infecting isolate were 1, ≤0.25, 1.5 and ≤0.25 mg/L, respectively. The log(10) cfu/g (mean ± SD) viable counts in pus were as follows: controls (n = 16), 8.71 ± 1.34 (P < 0.001 versus all other groups); imipenem (n = 15), 4.89 ± 2.42; meropenem (n = 15), 4.24 ± 2.44; ertapenem (n = 16), 3.17 ± 1.85 (P = 0.022 versus imipenem); and aztreonam (n = 15), 3.62 ± 3.05. Mortality among treated rabbits was significantly reduced compared with controls. Four animals in the aztreonam group (26.7%) had culture-negative pus and no mortality was noted among aztreonam-treated animals.

CONCLUSIONS

In the rabbit experimental model, carbapenems were shown to be effective in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection due to an extended-spectrum β-lactamase-negative carbapenem-susceptible VIM-1-producing clinical E. coli strain, but treatment with aztreonam resulted in a more favourable outcome overall.