Carrier prevalence of Clostridioides difficile in emergency departments and the association of prior antibiotic consumption: a combined cross-sectional and nested case-control study

Antibiotic Usage and Healthcare-Associated Clostridioides difficile in Patients with and Without COVID-19: A Tertiary Hospital Experience

Background/Objectives: Data about the relationship between COVID-19 and healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile infection (HA-CDI) occurrence are still controversial. This study examines antibiotics associated with CDI in patients with and without COVID-19 infection. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at the University Clinical Center Belgrade, Serbia, from January 2019 to December 2021. Patients with the first episode of HA-CDI without and with COVID-19 were included. Results of bacteriology analyses, demographic and clinical data, and data on antibiotic usage and daily defined doses (DDD) were collected by the hospital Infection Control Team. Results: Out of 547 HA-CDI cases, 341 (62.3%) had COVID-19 infection. HA-CDI patients with COVID-19 were significantly younger (p = 0.017) with fewer comorbidities (<0.001). Two or more antibiotics in therapy were more frequently used by those patients (p = 0.03). COVID-19 patients were treated significantly more by third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones (p < 0.001) and macrolides (p = 0.01). Ceftriaxone had a higher median DDD in COVID-19 patients (6.00, range 1.00-20.00) compared to non-COVID-19 patients (4.00, range 1.00-14.00), (p = 0.007). Conversely, meropenem showed a lower median DDD in COVID-19 patients. Multivariate analysis identified the use of fourth-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones as independent risk factors for HA-CDI in COVID-19 patients. Conclusions: Patients with HA-CDI and COVID-19 more frequently received two or more antibiotics before the onset of HAI-CDI. The third and fourth generations of cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones and macrolides were administered significantly more often in these patients. More frequent administration of ceftriaxone was observed, but the lower DDD associated with meropenem needed additional analysis.

Heterogeneity of Clostridioides difficile asymptomatic colonization prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Asymptomatic carriers significantly influence the transmission dynamics of C. difficile. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of toxigenic C. difficile asymptomatic colonization (tCDAC) and investigate its heterogeneity across different populations. We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus for articles published between 2000 and 2023 on tCDAC. Studies including asymptomatic adults with laboratory-confirmed tCDAC were eligible. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence by clinical characteristics, settings, and geographic areas. In addition, we used outlier analyses and meta-regression to explore sources of prevalence variability.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies involving 39,447 patients were included. The tCDAC prevalence ranged from 0.5 to 51.5%. Among pooled estimates, a high prevalence was observed in patients with cystic fibrosis, outbreak settings, and cancer patients, whereas the lowest rates were found in healthy individuals and healthcare workers. Similar colonization rates were observed between admitted and hospitalized patients. Our meta-regression analysis revealed lower rates in healthy individuals and higher rates in cystic fibrosis patients and studies from North America. Additionally, compared with that among healthy individuals, the prevalence significantly increased by 15-47% among different populations and settings.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that tCDAC is a common phenomenon. We found high prevalence estimates that showed significant variability across populations. This heterogeneity could be partially explained by population characteristics and settings, supporting their role in the pathogenesis and burden of this disease. This highlights the need to identify high-risk groups to improve infection control strategies, decrease transmission dynamics, and better understand the natural history of this disease.

Experience with PCR Testing for Enteric Bacteria and Viruses of Emergency Department Patients with Acute Gastroenteritis: Are There Implications for the Early Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection?

Early identification of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) pathogens via PCR may improve the management of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). In this study, we evaluated the implementation of a testing algorithm for ED patients with AGE using the BD MAX automated PCR system. Data from 133 patients were analyzed. A total of 56 patients (42%) tested positive via PCR for at least one bacterial or viral pathogen. The median time to report PCR results was 6.17 h compared to 57.28 h for culture results for bacterial pathogens. The most common pathogen was Clostridioides difficile (n = 20, 15%). In total, 14 of the 20 C. difficile-positive patients were aged >65 years and 17 of the 20 patients (85%) were diagnosed with a clinically relevant infection based on typical symptoms and laboratory values. They received antibiotics, mostly oral vancomycin, starting a median of 11.37 h after ED admission. The introduction of PCR for the diagnosis of AGE infection in patients presenting to the ED may have the greatest impact on the rapid identification of C. difficile and the timely administration of antibiotics if necessary.

Can the Evidence-Based Use of Probiotics (Notably Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) Mitigate the Clinical Effects of Antibiotic-Associated Dysbiosis?

Dysbiosis corresponds to the disruption of a formerly stable, functionally complete microbiota. In the gut, this imbalance can lead to adverse health outcomes in both the short and long terms, with a potential increase in the lifetime risks of various noncommunicable diseases and disorders such as atopy (like asthma), inflammatory bowel disease, neurological disorders, and even behavioural and psychological disorders. Although antibiotics are highly effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in infectious diseases, antibiotic-associated diarrhoea is a common, non-negligible clinical sign of gut dysbiosis (and the only visible one). Re-establishment of a normal (functional) gut microbiota is promoted by completion of the clinically indicated course of antibiotics, the removal of any other perturbing external factors, the passage of time (i.e. recovery through the microbiota's natural resilience), appropriate nutritional support, and-in selected cases-the addition of probiotics. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials have confirmed the strain-specific efficacy of some probiotics (notably the yeast Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 and the bacterium Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) in the treatment and/or prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in children and in adults. Unusually for a probiotic, S. boulardii is a eukaryote and is not therefore directly affected by antibiotics-making it suitable for administration in cases of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. A robust body of evidence from clinical trials and meta-analyses shows that the timely administration of an adequately dosed probiotic (upon initiation of antibiotic treatment or within 48 h) can help to prevent or resolve the consequences of antibiotic-associated dysbiosis (such as diarrhoea) and promote the resilience of the gut microbiota and a return to the pre-antibiotic state. A focus on the prescription of evidence-based, adequately dosed probiotics should help to limit unjustified and potentially ineffective self-medication.