Population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in premature newborns

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations of Antibiotic Use in Neonates

The selection of an appropriate dose of a given antibiotic for a neonate not only requires knowledge of the drug's basic pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties but also the profound effects that organ development might have on the volume of distribution and clearance, both of which may affect the PK/PD of a drug. Interest has grown in alternative antibiotic dosing strategies that are better aligned with the antibiotic's PK and PD properties. These strategies should be used in conjunction with minimum inhibitory concentration measurements and therapeutic drug monitoring to measure their potential success. They can also guide the clinician in tailoring the delivery of antibiotics to suit an individual patient's needs. Model-informed precision dosing, such as Bayesian forecasting dosing software (which incorporates PK/PD population models), may be utilized to optimize antibiotic exposure in neonatal populations. Consequently, optimizing the antibiotic dose and exposure in each newborn requires expertise in different fields. It drives the collaboration of physicians together with lab technicians and quantitative clinical pharmacologists.

Evaluating and Improving Neonatal Gentamicin Pharmacokinetic Models Using Aggregated Routine Clinical Care Data

Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) can aid dose decision-making for drugs such as gentamicin that have high inter-individual variability, a narrow therapeutic window, and a high risk of exposure-related adverse events. However, MIPD in neonates is challenging due to their dynamic development and maturation and by the need to minimize blood sampling due to low blood volume. Here, we investigate the ability of six published neonatal gentamicin population pharmacokinetic models to predict gentamicin concentrations in routine therapeutic drug monitoring from nine sites in the United State (n = 475 patients). We find that four out of six models predicted with acceptable levels of error and bias for clinical use. These models included known important covariates for gentamicin PK, showed little bias in prediction residuals over covariate ranges, and were developed on patient populations with similar covariate distributions as the one assessed here. These four models were refit using the published parameters as informative Bayesian priors or without priors in a continuous learning process. We find that refit models generally reduce error and bias on a held-out validation data set, but that informative prior use is not uniformly advantageous. Our work informs clinicians implementing MIPD of gentamicin in neonates, as well as pharmacometricians developing or improving PK models for use in MIPD.

Gentamicin Dosing in Neonates with Normal Renal Function: Trough and Peak Levels

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Gentamicin is commonly used in neonates, and it requires drug concentration monitoring. The objective of this study was to determine the extent of high trough (≥ 2 mg/l) and therapeutic peak serum gentamicin concentrations (5-12 mg/l) using our current gentamicin regimen and to adjust the dosing regimen accordingly and reassess.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of neonates, with normal renal function, who were prescribed gentamicin. Group 1: March 2014-July 2017-gentamicin intravenous (IV) 2.5 mg/kg given every 36 h if < 30 weeks gestational age (GA) and every 24 h if ≥ 30 weeks GA; Group 2: August 2019-February 2020-gentamicin IV 3.5 mg/kg given every 36 h if < 30 weeks GA and every 24 h if ≥ 30 weeks GA. We assessed the number of neonates with aberrant trough and peak serum gentamicin concentrations.

RESULTS

Forty-eight neonates < 30 weeks GA and 34 ≥ 30 weeks GA were given 2.5 mg/kg gentamicin. Eleven (23%) neonates < 30 weeks GA and four (13%) ≥ 30 weeks GA had subtherapeutic peak concentrations (< 5 mg/l); none had supratherapeutic (> 12 mg/l) or toxic trough concentrations (≥ 2 mg/l). Forty-four neonates < 30 weeks GA and 54 ≥ 30 weeks GA were given 3.5 mg/kg gentamicin. Eighty-four (86%) had non-toxic trough concentrations (< 2 mg/l). One (1%) < 30 weeks GA neonate had subtherapeutic (< 5 mg/l) and one (1%) neonate ≥ 30 weeks GA had supratherapeutic (> 12 mg/l) peak concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Gentamicin regimen of 2.5 mg/kg given every 36 h for neonates < 30 weeks GA and every 24 h for neonates ≥ 30 weeks GA was suboptimal at achieving therapeutic gentamicin peak. Increasing the dosage to 3.5 mg/kg achieved therapeutic peak concentrations in 98% and non-toxic trough concentrations in 86% of all neonates (prior to dose interval adjustment).

Prolonged Post-Discontinuation Antibiotic Exposure in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates at Risk for Early-Onset Sepsis

BACKGROUND

Premature, very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates are at risk for early-onset sepsis and receive ampicillin and gentamicin post-birth. Antimicrobial stewardship supports short-course antibiotics, but how long antibiotic concentrations remain therapeutic post-last dose is unknown.

METHODS

Using Monte Carlo simulations (NONMEM 7.3), we analyzed antibiotic exposures in a retrospective cohort of 34 689 neonates (<1500 g, 22-27 weeks of gestation). Therapeutic exposure for ampicillin and gentamicin was evaluated relative to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for common pathogens (MIC 0.25-8 mcg/mL for group B streptococcus [GBS] and Escherichia coli). Post-discontinuation antibiotic exposure (PDAE) was defined as the time from the last dose to time when concentration decreased below MIC.

RESULTS

Neonates had a median (range) gestational age of 26 (22-27) weeks and BW, 790 g (400-1497) . All ampicillin dosing regimens (50-100 mg/kg every 8-12 hours for 2-6 doses) achieved therapeutic exposures > MIC range. After the last dose, the PDAE mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) ranged from 34 to 50 hours (17-79) for E. coli (MIC 8) and 82 to 104 hours (95% CI: 39-122) for GBS (MIC 0.25); longer PDAE occurred with higher dose, shorter interval, and longer course. Short-course ampicillin (2 doses, 50 mg/kg every 12 hours) provided PDAE 34 hours for E. coli and 82 hours for GBS. Single-dose 5 mg/kg gentamicin provided PDAE > MIC 2 for 26 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

In VLBW neonates, ampicillin exposure remains therapeutic long after the last dose. Short-course ampicillin provided therapeutic exposures throughout the typical blood culture incubation period.

Simplified Dosing Regimens for Gentamicin in Neonatal Sepsis

Background: The effectiveness of antibiotics for the treatment of severe bacterial infections in newborns in resource-limited settings has been determined by empirical evidence. However, such an approach does not warrant optimal exposure to antibiotic agents, which are known to show different disposition characteristics in this population. Here we evaluate the rationale for a simplified regimen of gentamicin taking into account the effect of body size and organ maturation on pharmacokinetics. The analysis is supported by efficacy data from a series of clinical trials in this population.

Methods: A previously published pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate gentamicin concentration vs. time profiles in a virtual cohort of neonates. Model predictive performance was assessed by supplementary external validation procedures using therapeutic drug monitoring data collected in neonates and young infants with or without sepsis. Subsequently, clinical trial simulations were performed to characterize the exposure to intra-muscular gentamicin after a q.d. regimen. The selection of a simplified regimen was based on peak and trough drug levels during the course of treatment.

Results: In contrast to current World Health Organization guidelines, which recommend gentamicin doses between 5 and 7.5 mg/kg, our analysis shows that gentamicin can be used as a fixed dose regimen according to three weight-bands: 10 mg for patients with body weight <2.5 kg, 16 mg for patients with body weight between 2.5 and 4 kg, and 30 mg for those with body weight >4 kg.

Conclusion: The choice of the dose of an antibiotic must be supported by a strong scientific rationale, taking into account the differences in drug disposition in the target patient population. Our analysis reveals that a simplified regimen is feasible and could be used in resource-limited settings for the treatment of sepsis in neonates and young infants with sepsis aged 0–59 days.

Does "Birth" as an Event Impact Maturation Trajectory of Renal Clearance via Glomerular Filtration? Reexamining Data in Preterm and Full-Term Neonates by Avoiding the Creatinine Bias

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is an important measure of renal function. Various models for its maturation have recently been compared; however, these have used markers, which are subject to different renal elimination processes. Inulin clearance data (a purer probe of GFR) collected from the literature were used to determine age‐related changes in GFR aspects of renal drug excretion in pediatrics. An ontogeny model was derived using a best‐fit model with various combinations of covariates such as postnatal age, gestational age at birth, and body weight. The model was applied to the prediction of systemic clearance of amikacin, gentamicin, vancomycin, and gadobutrol. During neonatal life, GFR increased as a function of both gestational age at birth and postnatal age, hence implying an impact of birth and a discrepancy in GFR for neonates with the same postmenstrual age depending on gestational age at birth (ie, neonates who were outside the womb longer had higher GFR, on average). The difference in GFR between pre‐term and full‐term neonates with the same postmenstrual age was negligible from beyond 1.25 years. Considering both postnatal age and gestational age at birth in GFR ontogeny models is important because postmenstrual age alone ignores the impact of birth. Most GFR models use covariates of body size in addition to age. Therefore, prediction from these models will also depend on the change in anthropometric characteristics with age. The latter may not be similar in various ethnic groups, and this makes the head‐to‐head comparison of models very challenging.

Pharmacokinetic considerations in pediatric pharmacotherapy

Purpose

The changes in physiological functions as children grow and organ systems mature result in pharmacokinetic alterations throughout childhood. These alterations in children result in absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of drugs that are different from those seen in the typical adult diseased population.

Summary

Changes in gastrointestinal motility and gastric pH in neonates and infants affect the absorption rate and bioavailability of drugs. Skin absorption rate and extent can be altered by different skin structures and perfusion in young children. Intramuscular and rectal absorption become less predictable in children due to erratic absorption site perfusion and other factors. Children’s body compositions also differ greatly from that in adults. Water-soluble drugs distribute more extensively in newborns due to larger water content than in older children and adults. Drug elimination and excretion are also affected in pediatric population due to differences in liver and renal function. Immature enzyme development and renal function result in reduced clearance of drugs in young children. There are limited pharmacokinetic data available for many drugs used in children.

Conclusion

Considering the changes in pharmacokinetics in children can help pharmacists optimize the dosing and monitoring of drugs and do the best they can to help this vulnerable population.

Optimizing gentamicin conventional and extended interval dosing in neonates using Monte Carlo simulation - a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Although aminoglycosides are routinely used in neonates, controversy exists regarding empiric dosing regimens. The objectives were to determine gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates, and develop initial mg/kg dosing recommendations that optimized target peak and trough concentration attainment for conventional and extended-interval dosing (EID) regimens.

METHODS

Patient demographics and steady-state gentamicin concentration data were retrospectively collected for 60 neonates with no renal impairment admitted to a level III neonatal intensive care unit. Mean pharmacokinetics were calculated and multiple linear regression was performed to determine significant covariates of clearance (L/h) and volume of distribution (L). Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis identified breakpoints for significant covariates. Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) was used to determine optimal dosing recommendations for each CART-identified sub-group.

RESULTS

Gentamicin clearance and volume of distribution were significantly associated with weight at gentamicin initiation. CART-identified breakpoints for weight at gentamicin initiation were: ≤ 850 g, 851-1200 g, and > 1200 g. MCS identified that a conventional dose of gentamicin 3.5 mg/kg given every 48 h or an EID of 8-9 mg/kg administered every 72 h in neonates weighing ≤ 850 g, and every 24 and 48 h, respectively, in neonates weighing 851-1200 g, provided the best probability of attaining conventional (peak: 5-10 mg/L and trough: ≤ 2 mg/L) and EID targets (peak:12-20 mg/L, trough:≤ 0.5 mg/L). Insufficient sample size in the > 1200 g neonatal group precluded further investigation of this weight category.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides initial gentamicin dosing recommendations that optimize target attainment for conventional and EID regimens in neonates weighing ≤ 1200 g. Prospective validation and empiric dose optimization for neonates > 1200 g is needed.

Pharmacometrics in Pediatrics

Pharmacometrics have advanced from compartmental analysis to noncompartmental analysis and population pharmacokinetics that require complicated mathematical programs. These sophisticated mathematical analyses determine not only the usual pharmacometric measures of clearance and volume of distribution but also the effects of covariates on these measures. Although these analyses are very suitable to studies of small patient populations often encountered in pediatric studies, most pediatric clinicians have not been trained in how these analyses are conducted or the meaning of the results of these analyses expressed in terms of error measures and fixed and variable effects. In addition, clinicians may not be able to evaluate whether their patient population is adequately represented in the analysis. Thorough and clear descriptions of the methodology and the strengths and weaknesses of these analyses need to be published in journals read by clinicians.

A review of population pharmacokinetic models of gentamicin in paediatric patients

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Gentamicin is often used for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. Due to pharmacokinetic variability in paediatric patients, appropriate dosing of gentamicin in the paediatric population is challenging. This article reviews published population pharmacokinetic models of gentamicin in paediatric patients, identifies covariates that significantly influence gentamicin pharmacokinetics, and determines whether there is a consensus on proposed dosing for intravenous gentamicin in this population.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for articles published until the end of 2017. If the articles described population pharmacokinetic models of gentamicin in the paediatric population (after intravenous administration of gentamicin), the following data were extracted: type of study, year of publication, population characteristics and number of patients, gentamicin dosing, total number of gentamicin (serum and/or plasma) concentrations, type of population modelling approach, developed model with pharmacokinetic parameters and covariates included.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In most of the studies, one- or two-compartment modelling was applied. The mean estimated gentamicin clearance for newborns, infants and the complete paediatric population was 0.048, 0.13 and 0.067 L/h/kg, respectively, and the mean predicted volume of distribution was 0.475, 0.35 and 0.33 L/kg, respectively. The values reflect differences in body composition and kidney maturation within the different paediatric populations. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics were most influenced by age, body size and renal function.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Based on our review, the authors agree on a prolonged dosing interval for preterm and term newborns (up to 48 hours). However, there was no agreement on proposed dosing with respect to gestational age. In general, the proposed daily doses were lower compared to those initially applied for preterm newborns and comparable to those for term newborns. For infants and children, the dosing interval remained unchanged (24 hours), but the proposed daily doses were higher than actually applied. When differences in the paediatric population are considered and an appropriate population PK model with applicable covariates is applied, dosing can be individualized. In the future, studies of gentamicin pharmacokinetics in paediatric patients should focus on currently underestimated covariates, such as fat-free mass, concomitantly administered drugs, body temperature and critical illness because these can change gentamicin PK considerably. Consequently, different dosing is required and TDM becomes even more important.

Innovative Study Designs Optimizing Clinical Pharmacology Research in Infants and Children

Almost half of recent pediatric trials failed to achieve labeling indications, in large part because of inadequate study design. Therefore, innovative study methods are crucial to optimizing trial design while also reducing the potential harms inherent with drug investigation. Several methods exist to optimize the amount of pharmacokinetic data collected from the smallest possible volume and with the fewest number of procedures, including the use of opportunistic and sparse sampling, alternative and noninvasive matrices, and microvolume assays. In addition, large research networks using master protocols promote collaboration, reduce regulatory burden, and increase trial efficiency for both early- and late-phase trials. Large pragmatic trials that leverage electronic health records can capitalize on central management strategies to reduce costs, enroll patients with rare diseases on a large scale, and augment study generalizability. Further, trial efficiency and safety can be optimized through Bayesian adaptive techniques that permit planned protocol changes based on analyses of prior and accumulated data. In addition to these trial design features, advances in modeling and simulation have paved the way for systems-based and physiologically based models that individualize pediatric dosing recommendations and support drug approval. Last, given the low prevalence of many pediatric diseases, collecting deidentified genetic and clinical data on a large scale is a potentially transformative way to augment clinical pharmacology research in children.

External Evaluation of a Gentamicin Infant Population Pharmacokinetic Model Using Data from a National Electronic Health Record Database

Gentamicin is a common antibiotic used in neonates and infants. A recently published population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed using data from multiple studies, and the objective of our analyses was to evaluate the feasibility of using a national electronic health record (EHR) database for further external evaluation of this model. Our results suggest that, with proper data capture procedures, EHR data can serve as a potential data source for external evaluation of PK models.

Effect of hypothermia treatment on gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Hypothermia is the current standard therapy for asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). Gentamicin is used for the empirical treatment of early-onset neonatal sepsis. We investigated the influence of hypothermia treatment on gentamicin pharmacokinetics and suggested the appropriate dosing recommendations for gentamicin in neonates with HIE receiving hypothermia treatment.

METHODS

We searched studies published until February 2017 in MEDLINE using PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Three independent reviewers screened the literature and extracted data from each study. All of the studies that reported the blood concentrations or pharmacokinetic parameters of gentamicin in hypothermic neonates with HIE were included in this review. Articles were excluded if they were not original research.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

A total of 8 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were performed in which the mean difference of gentamicin for the trough concentration and clearance between hypothermic and normothermic neonates were 0.81 mg/L (95% confidence interval [-0.07, 1.69]) and -0.21 mL/kg/min (95% confidence interval [-0.31, -0.12]), respectively. The factors affecting gentamicin clearance in hypothermic neonates with HIE were gestational age, birthweight and serum creatinine.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Gentamicin clearance is decreased in neonates with HIE receiving hypothermia treatment compared to those not receiving hypothermia treatment. Modified gentamicin dosing regimens are required to avoid potential toxicity related to higher concentrations during hypothermia treatment.

Quantitative Analysis of Gentamicin Exposure in Neonates and Infants Calls into Question Its Current Dosing Recommendations

Optimal dosing of gentamicin in neonates is still a matter of debate despite its common use. We identified gentamicin dosing regimens from eight international guidelines and seven Swiss neonatal intensive care units. The dose per administration, the dosing interval, the total daily dose, and the demographic characteristics between guidelines were compared. There was considerable variability with respect to dose (4 to 6 mg/kg), dosing interval (24 h to 48 h), total daily dose (2.5 to 6 mg/kg/day), and patient demographic characteristics that were used to calculate individualized dosing regimens. A model-based simulation study in 1071 neonates was performed to determine the achievement of efficacious peak gentamicin concentrations according to predefined MICs (Cmax/MIC ≥ 10) and safe trough concentrations (Cmin ≤ 2 mg/liter) with recommended dosing regimens. MIC targets of 0.5 and 1 mg/liter were used. Dosing optimization was performed giving priority to the first day of treatment and with the goal of simplifying dosing. Current gentamicin neonatal guidelines allow to achieve effective peak concentrations for MICs ≤ 0.5 mg/liter but not higher. Model-based simulations indicate that to attain peak gentamicin concentrations of ≥10 mg/liter, a dose of 7.5 mg/kg should be administered using an extended dosing interval regimen. Trough concentrations of ≤2 mg/liter can be maintained with a dosing interval of 36 to 48 h in neonates according to gestational and postnatal age. For treatment beyond 3 days, therapeutic drug monitoring is advised to maintain adequate serum concentrations.

Population pharmacokinetic modelling, Monte Carlo simulation and semi-mechanistic pharmacodynamic modelling as tools to personalize gentamicin therapy

Population pharmacokinetic modelling, Monte Carlo simulation and semi-mechanistic pharmacodynamic modelling are all tools that can be applied to personalize gentamicin therapy. This review summarizes and evaluates literature knowledge on the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of gentamicin and identifies areas where further research is required to successfully individualize gentamicin therapy using modelling and simulation techniques. Thirty-five studies have developed a population pharmacokinetic model of gentamicin and 15 studies have made dosing recommendations based on Monte Carlo simulation. Variability in gentamicin clearance was most commonly related to renal function in adults and body weight and age in paediatrics. Nine studies have related aminoglycoside exposure indices to clinical outcomes. Most commonly, efficacy has been linked to a Cmax/MIC ≥7-10 and a AUC24/MIC ≥70-100. No study to date has shown a relationship between predicted achievement of exposure targets and actual clinical success. Five studies have developed a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to predict bacteria killing and regrowth following gentamicin exposure and one study has developed a deterministic model of aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity. More complex semi-mechanistic models are required that consider the immune response, use of multiple antibiotics, the severity of illness, and both efficacy and toxicity. As our understanding grows, dosing of gentamicin based on sound pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles should be applied more commonly in clinical practice.

Extended-interval Dosing of Gentamicin in Premature Neonates Born at <32 Weeks' Gestation and >7 Days of age

PURPOSE

Extended-interval dosing (EID) regimens of gentamicin have been validated for treating confirmed or suspected early- and late-onset sepsis in preterm infants in the first week of life. Despite the marked changes in volume of distribution and renal clearance in preterm infants after the first few days of life, few studies have validated EID regimens of gentamicin in this population. The objective of the study was to evaluate an EID regimen of gentamicin in infants born at <32 weeks' gestational age and aged >7 days.

METHODS

This observational study of an EID regimen was conducted in 39 infants. Dosing interval was based on the serum drug concentration at 22 hours after the administration of the first dose of 5 mg/kg. Gentamicin peak (5-12 µg/mL) and trough (<2 µg/mL) levels were compared to those in a historical control group of 39 infants who received traditional-interval dosing (TID) of 2.5 mg/kg of gentamicin with dosing intervals of 8, 12, or 24 hours.

FINDINGS

There were no differences in birthweight, gestational age at birth, postmenstrual age, weight at the start of gentamicin administration, postnatal age, small for gestational age status, antenatal corticosteroid use, or postnatal indomethacin exposure between the 2 groups. In the EID group, dosing intervals were 24 hours in 30 infants, 36 hours in 6 infants, and 48 hours in 3 infants. Compared with the TID group (n = 39), the EID group had a significantly higher peak level (median, 9.0 vs 4.7 µg/mL) and a significantly lower trough level (median, 0.7 vs 1.1 µg/mL) (both, P < 0.001). On regression analysis, the postmenstrual age was correlated significantly with trough levels in the EID group. There was no adverse effect on renal function in either group. On follow-up, 1 infant in the EID group and 2 infants in the TID group had evidence of sensorineural hearing loss.

IMPLICATIONS

In infants born at <32 weeks' gestation and >7 days of age, an EID gentamicin regimen, with a dosing interval based on a single concentration measurement at 22 hours after the administration of the first dose, achieved therapeutic peak and trough levels and performed significantly better than did a TID regimen in reaching target peak and trough levels. Larger-scale trials are needed for assessing the clinical efficacy (treatment failure/success) of these regimens.

One dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin for treatment of suspected or proven sepsis in neonates

BACKGROUND

Animal studies and trials in older children and adults suggest that a 'one dose per day' regimen of gentamicin is superior to a 'multiple doses per day' regimen.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of one dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin in suspected or proven sepsis in neonates.

SEARCH METHODS

Eligible studies were identified by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 3) in the Cochrane Library (searched 8 April 2016), MEDLINE (1966 to 8 April 2016), Embase (1980 to 8 April 2016), and CINAHL (December 1982 to 8 April 2016).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing one dose per day ('once a day') compared to multiple doses per day ('multiple doses a day') of gentamicin to newborn infants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection and analysis was performed according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven RCTs were included (N = 574) and 28 excluded. All except one study enrolled infants of more than 32 weeks' gestation. Limited information suggested that infants in both 'once a day' as well as 'multiple doses a day' regimens showed adequate clearance of sepsis (typical RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.19; typical RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.19; 3 trials; N = 37). 'Once a day' gentamicin regimen was associated with fewer failures to attain peak level of at least 5 µg/ml (typical RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.47; typical RD -0.13, 95% CI -0.19 to -0.08; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 8; 9 trials; N = 422); and fewer failures to achieve trough levels of 2 µg/ml or less (typical RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.55; typical RD -0.22, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.15; NNTB = 4; 11 trials; N = 503). 'Once a day' gentamicin achieved higher peak levels (MD 2.58, 95% CI 2.26 to 2.89; 10 trials; N = 440) and lower trough levels (MD -0.57, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.44; 10 trials; N = 440) than 'multiple doses a day' regimen. There was no significant difference in ototoxicity between two groups (typical RR 1.69, 95% CI 0.18 to 16.25; typical RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.05; 5 trials; N = 214). Nephrotoxicity was not noted with either of the treatment regimens. Overall, the quality of evidence was considered to be moderate on GRADE analysis, given the small sample size and unclear/high risk of bias in some of the domains in a few of the included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from the currently available RCTs to conclude whether a 'once a day' or a 'multiple doses a day' regimen of gentamicin is superior in treating proven neonatal sepsis. However, data suggest that pharmacokinetic properties of a 'once a day' gentamicin regimen are superior to a 'multiple doses a day' regimen in that it achieves higher peak levels while avoiding toxic trough levels. There was no change in nephrotoxicity or auditory toxicity. Based on the assessment of pharmacokinetics, a 'once a day regimen' may be superior in treating sepsis in neonates of more than 32 weeks' gestation.

Scaling clearance in paediatric pharmacokinetics: All models are wrong, which are useful?

Linked Articles

This article is commented on in the editorial by Holford NHG and Anderson BJ. Why standards are useful for predicting doses. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2017; 83: 685–7. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13230

Aim

When different models for weight and age are used in paediatric pharmacokinetic studies it is difficult to compare parameters between studies or perform model‐based meta‐analyses. This study aimed to compare published models with the proposed standard model (allometric weight^0.75 and sigmoidal maturation function).

Methods

A systematic literature search was undertaken to identify published clearance (CL) reports for gentamicin and midazolam and all published models for scaling clearance in children. Each model was fitted to the CL values for gentamicin and midazolam, and the results compared with the standard model (allometric weight exponent of 0.75, along with a sigmoidal maturation function estimating the time in weeks of postmenstrual age to reach half the mature value and a shape parameter). For comparison, we also looked at allometric size models with no age effect, the influence of estimating the allometric exponent in the standard model and, for gentamicin, using a fixed allometric exponent of 0.632 as per a study on glomerular filtration rate maturation. Akaike information criteria (AIC) and visual predictive checks were used for evaluation.

Results

No model gave an improved AIC in all age groups, but one model for gentamicin and three models for midazolam gave slightly improved global AIC fits albeit using more parameters: AIC drop (number of parameters), –4.1 (5), –9.2 (4), –10.8 (5) and –10.1 (5), respectively. The 95% confidence interval of estimated CL for all top performing models overlapped.

Conclusion

No evidence to reject the standard model was found; given the benefits of standardised parameterisation, its use should therefore be recommended.

Development and Evaluation of a Gentamicin Pharmacokinetic Model That Facilitates Opportunistic Gentamicin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neonates and Infants

Trough gentamicin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is time-consuming, disruptive to neonatal clinical care, and a patient safety issue. Bayesian models could allow TDM to be performed opportunistically at the time of routine blood tests. This study aimed to develop and prospectively evaluate a new gentamicin model and a novel Bayesian computer tool (neoGent) for TDM use in neonatal intensive care. We also evaluated model performance for predicting peak concentrations and the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 h to time t h (AUC0- t). A pharmacokinetic meta-analysis was performed on pooled data from three studies (1,325 concentrations from 205 patients). A 3-compartment model was used with the following covariates: allometric weight scaling, postmenstrual and postnatal age, and serum creatinine concentration. Final parameter estimates (standard errors) were as follows: clearance, 6.2 (0.3) liters/h/70 kg of body weight; central volume (V), 26.5 (0.6) liters/70 kg; intercompartmental disposition (Q), 2.2 (0.3) liters/h/70 kg; peripheral volume V2, 21.2 (1.5) liters/70 kg; intercompartmental disposition (Q2), 0.3 (0.05) liters/h/70 kg; peripheral volume V3, 148 (52.0) liters/70 kg. The model's ability to predict trough concentrations from an opportunistic sample was evaluated in a prospective observational cohort study that included data from 163 patients and 483 concentrations collected in five hospitals. Unbiased trough predictions were obtained; the median (95% confidence interval [CI]) prediction error was 0.0004 (-1.07, 0.84) mg/liter. Results also showed that peaks and AUC0- t values could be predicted (from one randomly selected sample) with little bias but relative imprecision, with median (95% CI) prediction errors being 0.16 (-4.76, 5.01) mg/liter and 10.8 (-24.9, 62.2) mg · h/liter, respectively. neoGent was implemented in R/NONMEM and in the freely available TDMx software.

Pharmacometric Approaches to Personalize Use of Primarily Renally Eliminated Antibiotics in Preterm and Term Neonates

Sepsis remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity in neonates, and, as a consequence, antibiotics are the most frequently prescribed drugs in this vulnerable patient population. Growth and dynamic maturation processes during the first weeks of life result in large inter- and intrasubject variability in the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of antibiotics. In this review we (1) summarize the available population PK data and models for primarily renally eliminated antibiotics, (2) discuss quantitative approaches to account for effects of growth and maturation processes on drug exposure and response, (3) evaluate current dose recommendations, and (4) identify opportunities to further optimize and personalize dosing strategies of these antibiotics in preterm and term neonates. Although population PK models have been developed for several of these drugs, exposure-response relationships of primarily renally eliminated antibiotics in these fragile infants are not well understood, monitoring strategies remain inconsistent, and consensus on optimal, personalized dosing of these drugs in these patients is absent. Tailored PK/PD studies and models are useful to better understand relationships between drug exposures and microbiological or clinical outcomes. Pharmacometric modeling and simulation approaches facilitate quantitative evaluation and optimization of treatment strategies. National and international collaborations and platforms are essential to standardize and harmonize not only studies and models but also monitoring and dosing strategies. Simple bedside decision tools assist clinical pharmacologists and neonatologists in their efforts to fine-tune and personalize the use of primarily renally eliminated antibiotics in term and preterm neonates.

Population pharmacokinetic study of gentamicin in a large cohort of premature and term neonates

AIM

This study aims to investigate the clinical and demographic factors influencing gentamicin pharmacokinetics in a large cohort of unselected premature and term newborns and to evaluate optimal regimens in this population.

METHODS

All gentamicin concentration data, along with clinical and demographic characteristics, were retrieved from medical charts in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit over 5 years within the frame of a routine therapeutic drug monitoring programme. Data were described using non-linear mixed-effects regression analysis ( nonmem®).

RESULTS

A total of 3039 gentamicin concentrations collected in 994 preterm and 455 term newborns were included in the analysis. A two compartment model best characterized gentamicin disposition. The average parameter estimates, for a median body weight of 2170 g, were clearance (CL) 0.089 l h(-1) (CV 28%), central volume of distribution (Vc ) 0.908 l (CV 18%), intercompartmental clearance (Q) 0.157 l h(-1) and peripheral volume of distribution (Vp ) 0.560 l. Body weight, gestational age and post-natal age positively influenced CL. Dopamine co-administration had a significant negative effect on CL, whereas the influence of indomethacin and furosemide was not significant. Both body weight and gestational age significantly influenced Vc . Model-based simulations confirmed that, compared with term neonates, preterm infants need higher doses, superior to 4 mg kg(-1) , at extended intervals to achieve adequate concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

This observational study conducted in a large cohort of newborns confirms the importance of body weight and gestational age for dosage adjustment. The model will serve to set up dosing recommendations and elaborate a Bayesian tool for dosage individualization based on concentration monitoring.

Population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin and dosing optimization for infants

The aim of this study was to characterize and validate the population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in infants and to determine the influences of clinically relevant covariates to explain the inter- and intraindividual variabilities associated with this drug. Infants receiving intravenous gentamicin and with routine therapeutic drug monitoring were consecutively enrolled in the study. Plasma concentration and time data were retrospectively collected from 208 infants (1 to 24 months old) of the Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa (Spain), of whom 44% were males (mean age [± standard deviation], 5.8 ± 4.8 months; mean body weight, 6.4 ± 2.2 kg). Data analysis was performed with NONMEM 7.2. One- and two-compartment open models were analyzed to estimate the gentamicin population parameters and the influences of several covariates. External validation was carried out in another population of 55 infants. The behavior of gentamicin in infants exhibits two-compartment pharmacokinetics, with total body weight being the covariate that mainly influences central volume (Vc) and clearance (CL); this parameter was also related to creatinine clearance. Both parameters are age related and different from those reported for neonatal populations. On the basis of clinical presentation and diagnosis, a once-daily dosage regimen of 7 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h is proposed for intravenous gentamicin, followed by therapeutic drug monitoring in order to avoid toxicity and ensure efficacy with minimal blood sampling. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics and disposition were accurately characterized in this pediatric population (infants), with the parameters obtained being different from those reported for neonates and children. These differences should be considered in the dosing and therapeutic monitoring of this antibiotic.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling approaches in paediatric infectious diseases and immunology

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modelling is used to describe and quantify dose-concentration-effect relationships. Within paediatric studies in infectious diseases and immunology these methods are often applied to developing guidance on appropriate dosing. In this paper, an introduction to the field of PKPD modelling is given, followed by a review of the PKPD studies that have been undertaken in paediatric infectious diseases and immunology. The main focus is on identifying the methodological approaches used to define the PKPD relationship in these studies. The major findings were that most studies of infectious diseases have developed a PK model and then used simulations to define a dose recommendation based on a pre-defined PD target, which may have been defined in adults or in vitro. For immunological studies much of the modelling has focused on either PK or PD, and since multiple drugs are usually used, delineating the relative contributions of each is challenging. The use of dynamical modelling of in vitro antibacterial studies, and paediatric HIV mechanistic PD models linked with the PK of all drugs, are emerging methods that should enhance PKPD-based recommendations in the future.

Every 36-h gentamicin dosing in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy receiving hypothermia

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of a change in the empiric gentamicin dose from 5 mg kg(-1) every 24 h (Q24 h period) to 5 mg kg every 36 h (Q36 h period) on target drug concentration achievement in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) receiving therapeutic hypothermia.

STUDY DESIGN

Gentamicin drug concentrations in neonates with HIE receiving therapeutic hypothermia were examined during two time periods in a retrospective chart review. During the initial treatment period (November 2007 to March 2010; n=29), neonates received Q24 h period. During the second treatment period (January 2011 to May 2012; n=23), the dose was changed to Q36 h period. Cooling criteria and protocol remained the same between treatment periods. Gentamicin drug concentrations including achievement of target trough concentrations (<2 mg l(-1)) were compared between treatment periods. Individual Bayesian estimates of gentamicin clearance were also compared.

RESULT

Neonates with an elevated trough concentration >2 mg l(-1) decreased from 38 to 4% with implementation of a Q36-h dosing interval (P<0.007). The mean gentamicin trough concentration was 2.0 ± 0.8 mg l(-1) during the Q24 h period and 0.9 ± 0.4 mg l(-1) during the Q36 h period (P<0.001). Peak concentrations were minimally impacted (Q24 h 11.4 ± 2.3 mg l(-1) vs Q36 h 10.0 ± 1.9 mg l(-1); P=0.05). The change in gentamicin trough concentration could not be accounted for by differences in gentamicin clearance between treatment periods (P=0.9).

CONCLUSION

A 5 mg kg(-1) every 36-h gentamicin dosing strategy in neonates with HIE receiving therapeutic hypothermia improved achievement of target trough concentration <2 mg l(-1), while still providing high peak concentration exposure.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis during the first 2 years of life: an overview

Three decades after its introduction, pharmacokinetic population approaches have become a reference method for drug modelling, particularly in paediatrics. The main practical limitation in this specific population is the collected blood volume. Pharmacokinetic population approaches using sparse sampling may resolve this issue. The pharmacokinetics of many drugs have been studied during the last 25 years using such methods. This review summarizes all of the published studies concerning population pharmacokinetic approaches in paediatric subjects from neonate to 2 years old. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database, from 1985 to December 2010, using the following terms: pharmacokinetic(s), population, paediatric/pediatric and neonate(s). Articles were excluded if they were not pertinent according to our criteria. References of all relevant articles were also evaluated. Ninety-eight studies were included in this review. The following information was extracted from the articles: drug name, therapeutic class, population size, age of patients, number of samples per patient, covariates used for clearance and volume of distribution estimates, software used for modelling and validation methods. An increasing rate of publications over the years was observed; 44 different drugs were studied using a pharmacokinetic population approach. Antibacterials were the most studied class of drugs, including a large number of studies devoted to vancomycin and gentamicin. It must be underlined that few studies have been performed on anticonvulsant drugs and anaesthetics used in clinical daily practice conditions.

Gentamicin pharmacokinetics and dosing in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy receiving hypothermia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) receiving hypothermia and to identify an empiric gentamicin dosing strategy in this population that optimizes achievement of target peak and trough concentrations.

DESIGN

Population pharmacokinetic study using retrospective medical record data.

SETTING

Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

A total of 29 full-term neonates diagnosed with HIE treated with hypothermia who received gentamicin and underwent therapeutic drug monitoring

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Patient demographics and gentamicin concentration data were retrospectively collected over a 2-year period. A population-based pharmacokinetic model was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM). Using the developed model, Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the probability of achieving target peak (> 6 mg/L) and trough (< 2 mg/L) gentamicin concentrations for various potential dosing regimens. A one-compartment model best described the available gentamicin concentration data. Birthweight and serum creatinine significantly influenced gentamicin clearance. For the typical study neonate (birthweight 3.3 kg, serum creatinine 0.9 mg/dl), clearance was 0.034 L/hour/kg and volume was 0.52 L/kg. At a 24-hour dosing interval, Monte Carlo simulations predicted target gentamicin peak and trough concentrations could not be reliably achieved at any dose. At a 36-hour dosing interval, a dose of 4-5 mg/kg is predicted to achieve target gentamicin peak and trough concentrations in more than 90% of neonates.

CONCLUSIONS

Gentamicin clearance is decreased in neonates with HIE treated with hypothermia compared with previous reports in nonasphyxiated normothermic full-term neonates. A prolonged 36-hour dosing interval will be needed to achieve target gentamicin trough concentrations in this population. Further prospective evaluation of this dosing recommendation is needed.

Extended interval dosing of gentamicin in premature neonates ≤ 28-week gestation

AIM

To evaluate an extended interval dosing (EID) regimen of gentamicin in neonates ≤28-week gestation.

METHODS

In 2008, an EID regimen for gentamicin was introduced for all neonates admitted to the NICU in Calgary. The dosing interval was based on a 22 h level after the first dose of 5mg/kg. We conducted an observational study in 33 infants ≤28-week gestation on the EID regimen from the first day of life and compared gentamicin peak and trough levels with a historical control of 34 infants who received gentamicin in a dose of 2.5 mg/kg every 24 h (TID, traditional interval dosing).

RESULTS

In the EID group, based on the 22 h level, dosing interval was 36 h in 20 neonates and 48 h in 13 neonates. All neonates, except one, achieved therapeutic peak and trough levels. Compared to the TID group, the EID group had higher peak levels (median 9.8 μg/mL vs. 4.6 μg/mL, p < 0.001) with no difference in trough levels. With target peak levels of 5-12 μg/mL and trough levels of <2 μg/mL, a higher proportion of neonates in the TID group would need dose adjustment.

CONCLUSION

In neonates ≤ 28-week gestation, an EID regimen from day one of life, using a single level 22 h after the first dose for dosing interval, achieves therapeutic peak and trough levels and more optimum peak levels as compared to a TID regimen.

Innovative clinical trial design for pediatric therapeutics

Until approximately 15 years ago, sponsors rarely included children in the development of therapeutics. US and European legislation has resulted in an increase in the number of pediatric trials and specific label changes and dosing recommendations, although infants remain an understudied group. The lack of clinical trials in children is partly due to specific challenges in conducting trials in this patient population. Therapeutics in special populations, including premature infants, obese children and children receiving extracorporeal life support, are even less studied. National research networks in Europe and the USA are beginning to address some of the gaps in pediatric therapeutics using novel clinical trial designs. Recent innovations in pediatric clinical trial design, including sparse and scavenged sampling, population pharmacokinetic analyses and 'opportunistic' studies, have addressed some of the historical challenges associated with clinical trials in children.

Factors Affecting Gentamicin Penetration in Lower Extremity Ischemic Tissues With Ulcers

The aims of the study were to analyze the penetration of gentamicin in foot ulcers in patients with different severities of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and to determine significant parameters affecting lower limb tissue concentrations. Patients undergoing debridement of a wound or an amputation procedure were included. All patients received a 120 mg or 240 mg intravenous dose of gentamicin prior to the procedure. Patients were classified according to the degree of PAD. Tissue and serum samples were collected at the time of intervention, and gentamicin concentrations were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Blood and tissue samples were taken from 61 patients, 41 males and 20 females with a mean age of 66 years. Nineteen patients had nil or borderline PAD, 9 patients had mild or moderate PAD, and 26 patients had severe PAD. Forty-eight patients had type 2 diabetes, 8 patients had type 1 diabetes, and 5 patients were nondiabetic. The concentration of gentamicin in peripheral skeletal muscle tissue was dependent on the serum concentration, degree of PAD, gender, and age. For patients with ischemic lower extremity wounds (patients with mild, moderate, and severe PAD), the concentration of gentamicin was significantly lower ( P = .010) than the concentration in nonischemic wounds, and the concentration in female patients was also significantly lower than in male patients ( P = .047). The concentration in peripheral subcutaneous tissue was 0.663 times the concentration in skeletal muscle tissue ( P < .00001). Gentamicin showed greatest penetration in male patients without PAD. For patients with severe PAD, higher doses of gentamicin may be required to achieve the same effect.

Tolerability and outcomes of kinetically guided therapy with gentamicin in critically ill neonates during the first week of life: an open-label, prospective study

BACKGROUND

Aminoglycosides are bactericidal antibiotics used worldwide for the treatment of serious infections in critically ill patients, including neonates. Critically ill neonates constitute a unique challenge in dosing owing to the pathologic alterations that accompany severe illness and the rapidly changing conditions of these patients.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this study was to analyze the kinetically guided dosage adjustment of gentamicin in neonates critically ill during the first week of life based on plasma concentrations after the first dose and to identify the impact of covariates (eg, fluid intake, body fluid retention) with respect to gestational age (GA). Tolerability of therapy was also assessed.

METHODS

This 10-day, open-label, prospective study included neonates critically ill during the first week of life admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of a children's hospital between January 2006 and July 2009. Hearing and renal assessments were conducted over a 24-month follow-up period. The patients were treated with gentamicin for suspected sepsis, proven sepsis, or pneumonia as an early sign of sepsis. The first and second doses of gentamicin 4 mg/kg were adjusted according to birth weight and GA: group 1 (GA < 34 weeks), 48-hour interdose intervals; group 2 (GA 34-38 weeks), 36 hours; and group 3 (GA > 38 weeks), 24 or 48 hours. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated after the first dose (given in 30-minute intravenous infusions) using 4 concentrations. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by fitting the parameters of a 2-compartment model into 4 concentrations. The last 2 blood samples were taken 30 minutes before the fourth infusion (C(trough,3)) and 1 hour after its start (C(max,4)). Dosing was individualized to reach target ranges for the C(trough,3) (0.5-2.0 mg/L) and C(max,4) (6-10 mg/L) values. If needed, initial dosing was changed after the second dose by adjusting (reducing or increasing) the third and subsequent doses, or by adjusting (prolonging or shortening) the interdose intervals. C(trough,3) and C(max,4) were assessed to determine differences between predicted and assayed values. Fluid retention was registered as the difference between fluid intake and urine output at different intervals related to the first dose per kilogram of birth weight, and from the start of the first infusion (0 hour) to the day of the fourth infusion. The C(max)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio was determined for assessment of optimal response. Tolerability was evaluated during the 24-month follow-up period using renal sonography to screen for nephrocalcinosis and transient evoked otoacoustic emission recordings to evaluate hearing abnormalities.

RESULTS

A total of 84 neonates (all white; 53 males, 31 females; birth weight range, 0.8-4.56 kg; GA range, 24-42 weeks) were enrolled in 3 groups: group 1, GA < 34 weeks, n = 27; group 2, GA 34-38 weeks, n = 22; and group 3, GA > 38 weeks, n = 35. The C(max) value detected 1 hour after the start of the first infusion (C(max,1)) reached the target range of 6-10 mg/L in 66 of the 84 neonates (79%). After the initial dose, C(max,1) was variable (%CV, 29%); the failure rate to reach 6 mg/L was 13%. V(d) decreased with GA (r = -0.30, P < 0.01) and achieved mean (SD) rates of 0.51 (0.10), 0.48 (0.13), and 0.40 (0.15) L/kg in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Neither C(max) nor V(d) was correlated with fluid intake relative to the first infusion. Mean gentamicin clearance measured after dose 1 (0.47 [0.23], 0.66 [0.26], and 0.76 [0.32] mL/min/kg) increased with GA (r = 0.45, P < 0.001). The interdose interval was prolonged after the second and subsequent infusions in 8 of 84 neonates (10%) or by decreasing the third dose and subsequent doses in 51 neonates (61%). The target C(max,4) and C(trough,3) values occurred in 63% (22 of 35) and 83% (29 of 35) of full-term patients (GA >38 weeks), respectively. In preterm neonates, the target range for C(max,4) was reached in 11 of 27 patients (41%) in group 1 and 11 of 22 patients (50%) in group 2; for C(trough,3), the target range was reached in 25 patients (93%) in group 1 and in 16 (73%) in group 2. C(trough,3) >2 mg/L was detected in 1 full-term neonate, and gentamicin was withdrawn. Suspected fluid retention within the time period of 0 hour to the day of the fourth infusion was well correlated with actual body weight (r = 0.58, P < 0.001), but it was negatively correlated with C(max,4) (r = -0.25, P = 0.02). Thirteen of the 84 neonates (15%) had confirmed sepsis. C(max)/MIC was >12 except for 2 resistant staphylococcal infections (C(max)/MIC = 0.4); amikacin and vancomycin were substituted for gentamicin in these cases. Clinical signs and laboratory data indicative of suspected sepsis disappeared in 5 to 10 days in 68 of 71 neonates. In 1 neonate, gentamicin was withdrawn after dose 4 because of a high C(trough,3) value. In the 3 remaining neonates, C-reactive protein was decreased >10 days without changing therapy. Two neonates died, 1 of severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy as a consequence of perinatal asphyxia and another of stage IV intraventricular hemorrhage. Transient renal dysfunction attributable to gentamicin was detected in 1 case. No signs of late toxicity (nephrocalcinosis) were found during the second year of follow-up. Two neonates were diagnosed with unilateral hearing loss, a secondary phenomenon of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy thought to be related to the severe perinatal asphyxia.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial dose of gentamicin 4 mg/kg for these critically ill premature and mature neonates with sepsis during the first week of life was high enough to reach bactericidal C(max,1) within 6-10 mg/L. C(max,1) <6 mg/L occurred in 13% of neonates. The interdose interval modified according to the recommendation resulted in C(trough) values within the target range of 0.5-2.0 mg/L in all but 2 neonates. The kinetically guided maintenance dosing of gentamicin based on plasma concentrations after the first dose should be optimized, taking into account actual body weight. (EudraCT number: 2005-002723-13).

Pharmacokinetic outcomes of a simplified, weight-based, extended-interval gentamicin dosing protocol in critically ill neonates

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the pharmacokinetic outcomes of a simplified, weight-based, extended-interval gentamicin dosing protocol for critically ill neonates.

DESIGN

Retrospective medical record review with pharmacokinetic analysis.

SETTING

Two neonatal intensive care units in a pediatric tertiary care system.

PATIENTS

Sequential sample of 644 critically ill neonates less than 7 days old without evidence of renal dysfunction who received gentamicin, dosed by using a simplified, weight-based, extended-interval dosing protocol, on the first day of life for suspected sepsis between February 2003 and January 2008, and who had subsequent gentamicin plasma concentrations measured during their first week of life.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data were collected on birth weight, gestational age at birth, serum creatinine concentration during the first 10 days of life, medical conditions, and concomitant drugs. Gentamicin dosing and its pharmacokinetic parameters were noted for each patient. A mean dose of 3.96 mg/kg/dose of gentamicin was administered intravenously every 48 hours in neonates weighing less than 1250 g at birth and every 24 hours in those weighing 1250 g or more. If the neonate received concurrent indomethacin, however, gentamicin was given every 48 hours. Protocol success was defined as a peak gentamicin plasma concentration of 7-10 mg/L and a trough concentration less than 2 mg/L. Mean gentamicin peak and trough concentrations were 9.38 mg/L (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.24-9.52 mg/L) and 1.00 mg/L (95% CI 0.96-1.04 mg/L), respectively. With use of the protocol, 361 neonates (56.1%) achieved gentamicin peak plasma concentrations in the range defined as successful and 610 neonates (94.7%) achieved successful trough concentrations. The mean gentamicin apparent volume of distribution and half-life were 0.48 L/kg (95% CI 0.47-0.49 L/kg) and 8.31 hours (95% CI 8.09-8.52 hrs), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This simplified, weight-based, extended-interval gentamicin dosing protocol for critically ill neonates was effective in achieving therapeutic peak plasma concentrations of gentamicin in most of the patients and, as a high proportion of patients had acceptable trough concentrations, may minimize the potential for toxicity.

Developmental pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in preterm and term neonates: population modelling of a prospective study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Preterm and term newborn infants show wide interindividual variability (IIV) in pharmacokinetic parameters of gentamicin. More extensive knowledge and use of predictive covariates could lead to faster attainment of therapeutic concentrations and a reduced need for concentration monitoring. This study was performed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in preterm and term neonates and to identify and quantify relationships between patient characteristics and IIV. A secondary aim was to evaluate cystatin C as a marker for gentamicin clearance in this patient population.

METHODS

Data were collected in a prospective study performed in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at the University Children's Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM) software. Bodyweight was included as the primary covariate according to an allometric power model. Other evaluated covariates were age (postmenstrual age, gestational age [GA], postnatal age [PNA]), markers for renal function (serum creatinine, serum cystatin C) and concomitant medication with cefuroxime, vancomycin or indometacin. Covariate-parameter relationships were explored using a stepwise covariate model building procedure. The predictive performance of the developed model was evaluated using an independent external dataset for a similar patient population.

RESULTS

Sixty-one newborn infants (GA range 23.3-42.1 weeks, PNA range 0-45 days) were enrolled in the study. In total, 894 serum gentamicin samples were included in the analysis. The concentration-time profile was described using a three-compartment model. Gentamicin clearance increased with the GA and PNA (included in a nonlinear fashion). The GA was also identified as having a significant influence on the central volume of distribution, with a preterm neonate having a larger central volume of distribution per kilogram of bodyweight than a term neonate. Cystatin C and creatinine were not correlated with gentamicin clearance in this study population. The external dataset was well predicted by the developed model.

CONCLUSION

Bodyweight and age (GA and PNA) were found to be major factors contributing to IIV in gentamicin clearance in neonates. Based on these data, cystatin C and serum creatinine were not correlated with gentamicin clearance and therefore not likely to be predictive markers of renal function in this patient population. Based on predictions from the developed model, preterm neonates do not reach targeted peak and trough gentamicin concentrations after a standard dosage regimen of 4 mg/kg given once daily, suggesting a need for higher loading doses and prolonged dosing intervals in this patient population.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides in neonates

The efficacy and toxicity of aminoglycosides show a strong direct positive relationship with blood drug concentrations, therefore, therapy with aminoglycosides in adults is usually guided by therapeutic drug monitoring. Dosing regimens in adults have evolved from multiple daily dosing to extended-interval dosing. This evolution has also taken place in neonates. Neonates, however, display large interindividual differences in the pharmacokinetics of aminoglycosides due to developmental differences early in life. The volume of distribution of aminoglycosides shows a strong relationship with bodyweight, which tends to be larger (corrected for bodyweight) in more premature infants and those with sepsis. Renal clearance of aminoglycosides increases with gestational age and accelerates immediately after birth. Because of these developmental influences, there is great inter- and intraindividual variability in the volume of distribution and clearance of these drugs, and investigators have established aminoglycoside dosing regimens based on bodyweight and/or gestational age. Widely practised dosing regimens comprise 4-5 mg/kg bodyweight of gentamicin every 24-48 hours as a first dose, followed by dose adjustment based on therapeutic drug monitoring. Although formal toxicity studies are scarce, there is no evidence that aminoglycoside toxicity in neonates differs from that in adults. Monitoring of blood drug concentrations and intelligent reconstruction of individual pharmacokinetic behaviour using a population pharmacokinetic model, optimally chosen blood sampling times and appropriate pharmacokinetic software, help clinicians to quickly optimize aminoglycoside dosing regimens to maximize the clinical effect and minimize the toxicity of these drugs.