Impact of natural polymorphisms of HIV-1 non-group M on genotypic susceptibility to the attachment inhibitor fostemsavir

Current Challenges With Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy and New Hope and Horizon With CRISPR-CAS9 Technology for HIV Treatment

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR/Cas system) is now the predominant approach for genome editing. Compared to conventional genetic editing methods, CRISPR/Cas technology offers several advantages that were previously unavailable. Key benefits include the ability to simultaneously modify multiple locations, reduced costs, enhanced efficiency, and a more user-friendly design. By directing Cas-mediated DNA cleavage to specific genomic targets and utilizing intrinsic DNA repair processes, this system can produce site-specific gene modifications. This goal is achieved through an RNA-guided procedure. As the most effective gene editing method currently available, the CRISPR/Cas system has proven to be highly valuable in genomic research across a wide range of species since its discovery as a component of the adaptive immune system in bacteria. Its applicability extends to various organisms, making it increasingly prevalent in the medical field, where it shows great promise in investigating viral infections, cancer, and genetic disorders. Furthermore, it enhances our understanding of fundamental genetics. This article outlines the current antiretroviral therapy and its adverse effects but also CRISPR/Cas technology. This review article also discusses its mechanism of action and potential applications in the treatment of HIV/AIDS.

Susceptibility to lenacapavir, fostemsavir and broadly neutralizing antibodies in French primary HIV-1 infected patients in 2020-2023

Surveillance studies of Transmitted Drug Resistance (TDR) are crucial in tracking the evolution of HIV epidemiology. Our aim was to investigate TDR to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), integrase inhibitors (INIs), as well as to new drugs: lenacapavir, fostemsavir. Predictive sensitivity was evaluated for maraviroc and broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) (zinlirvimab and teropavimab). Between 2020 and 2023, 85 people with HIV (PWH) were diagnosed with primary HIV-1 infection (PHI). Pol and env sequences were analyzed and TDR was characterized according to the French ANRS algorithm. The genotypic-based prediction of bNAbs sensitivity was based on HIV env amino acid signatures I108, I201, F353 for teropavimab and N325, N332, H330 for zinlirvimab. TDR to NRTIs, NNRTIs, PIs and INIs was evidenced in 8.2%, 12.9%, 4.7%, and 5.9% strains, respectively. Ten viruses were CXCR4/dual mix. All viruses were susceptible to lenacapavir (100%) and 52% harbored resistance to fostemsavir. The genotypic profile was associated with a predictive positive value (PPV) > 83% of susceptibility to both teropavimab and zinlirvimab for 23 viruses (31%), while 22 (29%) had a PPV between 62% and 75%, suggesting reduced susceptibility to both bNAbs as soon as primary infection. The surveillance of TDR evidenced at the time of PHI is important with regard to new strategies for HIV patients with virological failure and global implementation of PrEP using NRTI, INI such as recently approved injectable cabotegravir, and future long-acting drugs such as lenacapavir and bNAbs.

In vitro phenotypic susceptibility of HIV-1 non-group M to CCR5 inhibitor (maraviroc): TROPI-CO study

The susceptibility of genetically divergent HIV-1 strains (HIV-1 non-M) from groups O, N, and P to the CCR5 co-receptor antagonist, maraviroc (MVC), was investigated among a large panel of 45 clinical strains, representative of the viral genetic diversity. The results were compared to the reference strains of HIV-1 group M (HIV-1/M) with known tropism. Among the non-M strains, a wide range of phenotypic susceptibilities to MVC were observed. The large majority of HIV-1/O strains (40/42) displayed a high susceptibility to MVC, with median and mean IC50 values of 1.23 and 1.33 nM, respectively, similar to the HIV-1/M R5 strain (1.89 nM). However, the two remaining HIV-1/O strains exhibited a lower susceptibility (IC50 at 482 and 496 nM), in accordance with their dual/mixed (DM) tropism. Interestingly, the two HIV-1/N strains demonstrated varying susceptibility patterns, despite always having relatively low IC50 values (2.87 and 47.5 nM). This emphasized the complexity of determining susceptibility solely based on IC50 values. Our study examined the susceptibility of all HIV-1 non-M groups to MVC and correlated these findings with virus tropism (X4, R5, or DM). The results confirm the critical significance of tropism determination before initiating MVC treatment in patients infected with HIV-1 non-M. Furthermore, we advocate for the consideration of additional parameters, such as the slope of inhibition curves, to provide a more thorough characterization of phenotypic susceptibility profiles.

IMPORTANCE

Unlike HIV-1 group M, the scarcity of studies on HIV-1 non-M groups (O, N, and P) presents challenges in understanding their susceptibility to antiretroviral treatments, particularly due to their natural resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The TROPI-CO study logically complements our prior investigations into integrase inhibitors and anti-gp120 efficacy. The largest panel of 45 non-M strains existing so far yielded valuable results on maraviroc (MVC) susceptibility. The significant variations in MVC IC50 reveal a spectrum of susceptibilities, with most strains displaying R5 tropism. Notably, the absence of MVC-resistant strains suggests a potential therapeutic avenue. The study also employs a robust novel cell-based phenotropism assay and identifies distinct groups of susceptibilities based on inhibition curve slopes. Our findings emphasize the importance of determining tropism before initiating MVC and provide crucial insights for selecting effective therapeutic strategies in the delicate context of HIV-1 non-M infections.

The Phenomenon of Antiretroviral Drug Resistance in the Context of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment: Dynamic and Ever Evolving Subject Matter

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a significant global health issue that affects a substantial number of individuals across the globe, with a total of 39 million individuals living with HIV/AIDS. ART has resulted in a reduction in HIV-related mortality. Nevertheless, the issue of medication resistance is a significant obstacle in the management of HIV/AIDS. The unique genetic composition of HIV enables it to undergo rapid mutations and adapt, leading to the emergence of drug-resistant forms. The development of drug resistance can be attributed to various circumstances, including noncompliance with treatment regimens, insufficient dosage, interactions between drugs, viral mutations, preexposure prophylactics, and transmission from mother to child. It is therefore essential to comprehend the molecular components of HIV and the mechanisms of antiretroviral medications to devise efficacious treatment options for HIV/AIDS.

Mechanism of action, resistance, interaction, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of fostemsavir

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has licensed many antiretroviral medications to treat human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), however, treatment options for people with multi-drug resistant HIV remain limited. Medication resistance, undesirable effects, prior tolerance, and previous interlacement incapacity to deliver new drug classes all lead to the requirement for new medication classes and drug combination therapy. Fostemsavir (FTR) is a new CD-4 attachment inhibitor medicine that was recently authorized by the United States FDA to treat HIV-1. In individuals with multidrug-resistant (MDR) HIV-1, FTR is well tolerated and virologically active. According to recent investigations, drug combination therapy can positively affect MDR-HIV. The mechanism of action, resistance, interaction, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of FTR has been highlighted in this review.

HIV-1 Non-Group M Strains and ART

To eliminate HIV infection, there are several elements to take into account to limit transmission and break viral replication, such as epidemiological, preventive or therapeutic management. The UNAIDS goals of screening, treatment and efficacy should allow for this elimination if properly followed. For some infections, the difficulty is linked to the strong genetic divergence of the viruses, which can impact the virological and therapeutic management of patients. To completely eliminate HIV by 2030, we must therefore also be able to act on these atypical variants (HIV-1 non-group M) which are distinct from the group M pandemic viruses. While this diversity has had an impact on the efficacy of antiretroviral treatment in the past, recent data show that there is real hope of eliminating these forms, while maintaining vigilance and constant surveillance, so as not to allow more divergent and resistant forms to emerge. The aim of this work is therefore to share an update on the current knowledge on epidemiology, diagnosis and antiretroviral agent efficacy of HIV-1 non-M variants.

The Effect of Treatment-Associated Mutations on HIV Replication and Transmission Cycles

HIV/AIDS mortality has been decreasing over the last decade. While promising, this decrease correlated directly with increased use of antiretroviral drugs. As a natural consequence of its high mutation rate, treatments provide selection pressure that promotes the natural selection of escape mutants. Individuals may acquire drug-naive strains, or those that have already mutated due to treatment. Even within a host, mutation affects HIV tropism, where initial infection begins with R5-tropic virus, but the clinical transition to AIDS correlates with mutations that lead to an X4-tropic switch. Furthermore, the high mutation rate of HIV has spelled failure for all attempts at an effective vaccine. Pre-exposure drugs are currently the most effective drug-based preventatives, but their effectiveness is also threatened by viral mutation. From attachment and entry to assembly and release, the steps in the replication cycle are also discussed to describe the drug mechanisms and mutations that arise due to those drugs. Revealing the patterns of HIV-1 mutations, their effects, and the coordinated attempt to understand and control them will lead to effective use of current preventative measures and treatment options, as well as the development of new ones.

Prevalence of gp160 polymorphisms known to be related to decreased susceptibility to temsavir in different subtypes of HIV-1 in the Los Alamos National Laboratory HIV Sequence Database

Background

Fostemsavir, a prodrug of the gp120-directed attachment inhibitor temsavir, is indicated for use in heavily treatment-experienced individuals with MDR HIV-1. Reduced susceptibility to temsavir in the clinic maps to discrete changes at amino acid positions in gp160: S375, M426, M434 and M475.

Objectives

To query the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) HIV Sequence Database for the prevalence of polymorphisms at gp160 positions of interest.

Methods

Full-length gp160 sequences (N = 7560) were queried for amino acid polymorphisms relative to the subtype B consensus at positions of interest; frequencies were reported for all sequences and among subtypes/circulating recombinant forms (CRFs) with ≥10 isolates in the database.

Results

Among 239 subtypes in the database, the 5 most prevalent were B (n = 2651, 35.1%), C (n = 1626, 21.5%), CRF01_AE (n = 674, 8.9%), A1 (n = 273, 3.6%) and CRF02_AG (n = 199, 2.6%). Among all 7560 sequences, the most prevalent amino acids at positions of interest (S375, 73.5%; M426, 82.1%; M434, 88.2%; M475, 89.9%) were the same as the subtype B consensus. Specific polymorphisms with the potential to decrease temsavir susceptibility (S375H/I/M/N/T/Y, M426L/P, M434I/K and M475I) were found in <10% of isolates of subtypes D, G, A6, BC, F1, CRF07_BC, CRF08_BC, 02A, CRF06_cpx, F2, 02G and 02B. S375H and M475I were predominant among CRF01_AE (S375H, 99.3%; M475I, 76.3%; consistent with previously reported low temsavir susceptibility of this CRF) and 01B (S375H, 71.7%; M475I, 49.5%).

Conclusions

Analysis of the LANL HIV Sequence Database found a low prevalence of gp160 amino acid polymorphisms with the potential to reduce temsavir susceptibility overall and among most of the common subtypes.

In vitro susceptibility to fostemsavir is not affected by long-term exposure to antiviral therapy in MDR HIV-1-infected patients

OBJECTIVES

Fostemsavir is the prodrug of the HIV-1 attachment inhibitor temsavir and is currently under clinical assessment in heavily treatment-experienced patients with limited therapeutic options. We evaluated the genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility to temsavir in a panel of samples collected from patients harbouring MDR strains enrolled in the Italian PRESTIGIO Registry.

METHODS

Plasma samples from 24 patients were used for HIV-1 gp120 sequencing, while viral tropism and susceptibility to temsavir were assessed through a homemade phenotypic assay with pseudotyped viruses expressing patient-derived Env protein.

RESULTS

Of the 24 patients enrolled, 18 (75%) were male, median (IQR) age was 55 years (52-61), time since HIV-1 diagnosis was 27 years (24-30), time on ART was 26 years (23-27) and 11 (46%) had a previous AIDS diagnosis. Exposure to entry inhibitors (maraviroc and/or enfuvirtide) had occurred in 19 (79%) patients. Among 23/24 gp120 sequences obtained, temsavir resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were detected in three cases (two M426L and one S375N). Pseudotyped viruses were obtained from 23/24 samples and viral tropism was CXCR4-tropic, CCR5-tropic and dual/mixed-tropic in six, nine and eight cases, respectively. Phenotypic susceptibility to temsavir was comparable to the reference WT viruses NL4-3 and AD8 in all samples, irrespective of RAMs. Viral tropism and exposure to entry inhibitors did not impact temsavir susceptibility.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the use of fostemsavir as a valuable therapy option in patients harbouring MDR virus. The role of laboratory testing in optimal screening of patients eligible for fostemsavir treatment remains to be investigated.

Identification of gp120 polymorphisms in HIV-1 B subtype potentially associated with resistance to fostemsavir

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated natural resistance to the new antiretroviral fostemsavir and its potential association with other HIV-1 gp120 polymorphisms.

METHODS

A total of 1997 HIV-1 B subtype gp120 sequences from the Los Alamos HIV Database were analysed for mutation prevalence at fostemsavir resistance-associated positions and potential association with other gp120 polymorphisms. The role of each fostemsavir resistance-related position and the correlated gp120 mutations, both in protein stability and in reducing the binding affinity between antibody and/or T cell lymphocyte epitopes and the MHC molecules, was estimated.

RESULTS

The prevalence of fostemsavir resistance mutations was as follows: L116Q (0.05%), S375H/M/T (0.55%/1.35%/17.73%, the latter being far less relevant in determining resistance), M426L (7.56%), M434I (4.21%) and M475I (1.65%). Additionally, the M426R polymorphism had a prevalence of 16.32%. A significantly higher prevalence in X4 viruses versus R5 viruses was found only for S375M (0.69% versus 3.93%, P = 0.009) and S375T (16.60% versus 22.11%, P = 0.030). Some fostemsavirv resistance positions positively and significantly correlated with specific gp120 polymorphisms: S375T with I371V; S375M with L134W, I154V and I323T; M475I with K322A; and M426R with G167N, K192T and S195N. The topology of the dendrogram suggested the existence of three distinct clusters (bootstrap ≥0.98) involving these fostemsavir resistance mutations and gp120 polymorphisms. Interestingly, all clustered mutations are localized in class I/II-restricted T cell/antibody epitopes, suggesting a potential role in immune HIV escape.

CONCLUSIONS

A low prevalence of known fostemsavir resistance mutations was found in the HIV-1 B subtype. The detection of novel HIV-1 gp120 polymorphisms potentially relevant for fostemsavir resistance deserves new in-depth in vitro investigations.

Fostemsavir: The first oral attachment inhibitor for treatment of HIV-1 infection

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and role in therapy of fostemsavir in management of HIV-1 infection are reviewed, with an emphasis on clinical efficacy and safety data from phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials.

SUMMARY

Fostemsavir (Rukobia, ViiV Healthcare), is a prodrug of temsavir, a novel pyridine compound with potent activity against HIV-1. Fostemsavir, the first oral attachment inhibitor, was approved and granted the breakthrough therapy designation by the Food and Drug Administration for use in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in heavily treatment-experienced adults. As absorption of temsavir is not altered with increased gastric pH, patients may take acid suppressive agents such as famotidine during fostemsavir therapy.Temsavir is primarily metabolized through hydrolysis but also via cytochrome P-450 (CYP) oxidation; therefore, coadministration of fostemsavir with strong CYP3A inducers such as rifampin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, mitotane, enzalutamide, or St John's wort is contraindicated because it may result in significantly lower temsavir exposure, which can ultimately impair virologic response. The most common adverse reactions associated with fostemsavir use include nausea, diarrhea, headache, abdominal pain, dyspepsia, fatigue, rash, and sleep disturbance.

CONCLUSION

Fostemsavir may be an effective option for heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection. Fostemsavir is a particularly attractive treatment option for patients who are no longer able to achieve viral suppression with use of currently available antiretroviral therapies and who are able to adhere to a twice-daily oral regimen.

Mechanisms underlying of antiretroviral drugs in different cellular reservoirs with a focus on macrophages

Ongoing with current combinations of antiretroviral drugs for the treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection can successfully maintain long-term suppression of HIV-1 replication in plasma. Still, none of these therapies is capable of extinguishing the virus from the long-lived cellular reservoir, including monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), that means the principal obstacle to HIV cure. MDM are widely distributed in all tissues and organs, including central system nervous (CNS) where they represent the most frequent HIV-infected cells that means the principal obstacle to HIV cure. Current FDA-approved antiretroviral drugs target viral reverse transcriptase, protease, integrase, and entry processes (coreceptor or fusion blockade). It is desirable to continue to develop new antiretrovirals directed against alternative targets in the virus lifecycle in order to further optimize therapeutic options, overcome resistance to existing medications, and potentially contribute to the elimination of viral reservoirs.This review provides a comprehensive overview of the activity of antiretroviral drugs (classical and upcoming) in monocytes-derived macrophages (MDM). Defining the antiviral activity of these drugs in this important cellular HIV-1 reservoir provides crucial hints about their efficacy in HIV-1 infected patients.

Pharmacogenomics of Antiretroviral Drug Metabolism and Transport

Antiretroviral therapy has markedly reduced morbidity and mortality for persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Individual tailoring of antiretroviral regimens has the potential to further improve the long-term management of HIV through the mitigation of treatment failure and drug-induced toxicities. While the mechanisms underlying anti-HIV drug adverse outcomes are multifactorial, the application of drug-specific pharmacogenomic knowledge is required in order to move toward the personalization of HIV therapy. Thus, detailed understanding of the metabolism and transport of antiretrovirals and the influence of genetics on these pathways is important. To this end, this review provides an up-to-date overview of the metabolism of anti-HIV therapeutics and the impact of genetic variation in drug metabolism and transport on the treatment of HIV. Future perspectives on and current challenges in pursuing personalized HIV treatment are also discussed.

Virological response to integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based antiretroviral combinations in HIV-1 group O-infected patients

: Although integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are widely used in HIV-1 group M (HIV-1/M) infections, little is known about their efficacy against genetically divergent HIV-1 group O (HIV-1/O) strains. Previous phenotypic works have demonstrated the variable susceptibility of HIV-1/O strains, depending on INSTI drugs. Clinical data are very limited and obtained from a few patients.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the virological success rate of an INSTI-based combination of antiretroviral therapy (cART) in a large population of HIV-1/O-infected patients, and to describe resistance-associated mutations (RAM) at virological failure.

METHODS

The virological response of 39 patients receiving INSTI-based cART during their follow-up was analysed i) at the last point of the first INSTI initiation and ii) at their most recent visit. RAM analysis was performed at virological failures. Resistance interpretation was based on the French National Agency of Research on AIDS and viral hepatitis (ANRS) rules.

RESULTS

Virological success at both time points of analysis was high, with more than 87% of the patients with undetectable plasma viral load. Among the six patients with virological failure, three selected RAM described for HIV-1/M resistance, and two had already RAM, before INSTI initiation.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that HIV-1/O infected patients receiving INSTI-based cART presented a high rate of virological success whatever their previous lines; we have also shown that resistance rules for HIV-1/M could be considered when failure occurs. These data are of importance especially in the context of WHO recommendations for a wider use of this class.