Virological outcomes of boosted protease inhibitor-based first-line ART in subjects harbouring thymidine analogue-associated mutations as the sole form of transmitted drug resistance

Prevalence and risk of residual viremia after ART in low- and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional study

ABSTRACT

In order to design effective strategies to eradicate the HIV, an understanding of persistent viral reservoirs is needed. Many studies have demonstrated HIV residual viremia prevalence in high income countries, data from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) are limited. We assessed the prevalence, and factors associated with residual viremia in people with HIV (PWH), who were virally-suppressed on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in LMIC. We also compared residual viremia prevalence between the LMIC and US.This is a cross-sectional, retrospective study that utilized stored specimen samples from the AIDS clinical trials group (ACTG) studies A5175 and A5208. The last available sample among participants with plasma HIV RNA < 400 copies/mL for ≥3 years were tested by the HIV molecular and monitoring core gag (HMMCgag) single copy assay (SCA). Residual viremia was defined as detectable if ≥1 copy/mL. Spearman's correlation and multivariable stepwise logistic regression were used to assess associations of various factors with SCA.A total of 320 participants, 246 (77%) from LMIC and 74 (23%) from US, were analyzed. Median (IQR) age was 33 (2840) years; baseline CD4 166 (88,230) cells/mm3; HIV RNA 5.0 (4.5, 5.3) log10 copies/mL; duration of viral suppression 3.4 (3.1, 4.0) years and 48% were male. In 85 participants with information available, 53% were subtype C, 42% subtype B and 5% other subtypes. Overall prevalence of residual viremia was 57% [95% CI, 52-63] with 51% [40-63] in US and 59% [53-65] in LMIC. Among participants with detectable SCA, the median (IQR) HIV RNA was 3.8 (2.2, 8.1) copies/mL. The multivariable model conducted in LMIC participants showed that higher baseline HIV RNA was associated with detectable residual RNA (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.8, 4.6 for every log10 increase, P < .001). After including both US and LMIC in the final model, baseline HIV RNA remained significant. No difference in SCA detestability was found between US and LMIC sites (OR 1.1 [0.6, 2.0], P = .72) after adjusting for baseline RNA and parent study.The prevalence of residual viremia between both groups were not different and more than half of the participants had detectable viremia. Higher baseline HIV RNA was independently associated with residual viremia.

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based combination antiretroviral therapy is associated with lower cell-associated HIV RNA and DNA levels as compared with therapy based on protease inhibitors

Background:

It remains unclear whether combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens differ in their ability to fully suppress human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication. Here, we report the results of two cross-sectional studies that compared levels of cell-associated (CA) HIV markers between individuals receiving suppressive ART containing either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or a protease inhibitor (PI).

Methods:

CA HIV unspliced RNA and total HIV DNA were quantified in two cohorts (n = 100, n = 124) of individuals treated with triple ART regimens consisting of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus either an NNRTI or a PI. To compare CA HIV RNA and DNA levels between the regimens, we built multivariable models adjusting for age, gender, current and nadir CD4⁺ count, plasma viral load zenith, duration of virological suppression, NRTI backbone composition, low-level plasma HIV RNA detectability, and electronically measured adherence to ART.

Results:

In both cohorts, levels of CA HIV RNA and DNA strongly correlated (rho = 0.70 and rho = 0.54) and both markers were lower in NNRTI-treated than in PI-treated individuals. In the multivariable analysis, CA RNA in both cohorts remained significantly reduced in NNRTI-treated individuals (p_adj = 0.02 in both cohorts), with a similar but weaker association between the ART regimen and total HIV DNA (p_adj = 0.048 and p_adj = 0.10). No differences in CA HIV RNA or DNA levels were observed between individual NNRTIs or individual PIs, but CA HIV RNA was lower in individuals treated with either nevirapine or efavirenz, compared to PI-treated individuals.

Conclusions:

All current classes of antiretroviral drugs only prevent infection of new cells but do not inhibit HIV RNA transcription in long-lived reservoir cells. Therefore, these differences in CA HIV RNA and DNA levels by treatment regimen suggest that NNRTIs are more potent in suppressing HIV residual replication than PIs, which may result in a smaller viral reservoir size.

Funding:

This work was supported by ZonMw (09120011910035) and FP7 Health (305522).

First-line HIV treatment outcomes following the introduction of integrase inhibitors in UK guidelines

Objective:

To investigate the characteristics and outcomes of people who initiated different antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens during the era of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs).

Design:

UK-based observational cohort study.

Methods:

UK Collaborative HIV Cohort study participants were included if they had started ART between 1 January 2012 and 30 June 2017. Virological failure was defined as the first of two consecutive plasma HIV RNA more than 50 copies/ml, at least 6 months after starting ART. Follow-up was censored at ART discontinuation, class switch or death. The risk of virological failure among those on INSTI, protease inhibitor or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) regimens was compared using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods.

Results:

Of 12 585 participants, 45.6% started a NNRTI, 29.0% a protease inhibitor and 25.4% an INSTI regimen. Over a median follow-up of 20.3 months (interquartile range 7.9–38.9), 7.5% of participants experienced virological failure. Compared with those starting an NNRTI regimen, people receiving INSTIs or protease inhibitors were more likely to experience virological failure: INSTI group adjusted hazard ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.19–1.95, P = 0.0009; protease inhibitor group adjusted hazard ratio 2.70, 95% confidence interval 2.27–3.21, P less than 0.0001, likelihood ratio test P less than 0.0001.

Conclusion:

First-line INSTI regimens were associated with a lower risk of virological failure than protease inhibitor regimens but both groups were more likely to experience virological failure than those initiating treatment with a NNRTI. There is likely to be residual channelling bias resulting from selected use of INSTIs and protease inhibitors in specific clinical contexts, including in those with a perceived risk of poor adherence.

Differences in HIV Markers between Infected Individuals Treated with Different ART Regimens: Implications for the Persistence of Viral Reservoirs

In adherent individuals, antiretroviral therapy (ART) suppresses HIV replication, restores immune function, and prevents the development of AIDS. However, ART is not curative and has to be followed lifelong. Persistence of viral reservoirs forms the major obstacle to an HIV cure. HIV latent reservoirs persist primarily by cell longevity and proliferation, but replenishment by residual virus replication despite ART has been proposed as another potential mechanism of HIV persistence. It is a matter of debate whether different ART regimens are equally potent in suppressing HIV replication. Here, we summarized the current knowledge on the role of ART regimens in HIV persistence, focusing on differences in residual plasma viremia and other virological markers of the HIV reservoir between infected individuals treated with combination ART composed of different antiretroviral drug classes.