Use of dalbavancin in infective endocarditis: a case series

Comparative Effectiveness of Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides vs Standard-of-Care Antibiotics in Serious Bacterial Infections

Importance

Serious bacterial infections such as bacteremia, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and septic arthritis typically require prolonged intravenous antibiotics. Long-acting lipoglycopeptides (laLGPs), such as dalbavancin and oritavancin, offer extended treatment intervals for gram-positive infections that may benefit populations with barriers to traditional treatment, including persons who use drugs (PWUD individuals).

Objective

To assess the effectiveness of laLGPs in managing serious bacterial infections in both PWUD and non-PWUD populations compared with standard-of-care (SOC) antibiotics.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This comparative effectiveness study using a target trial emulation framework included data extracted from the US Cerner Real World Data platform. Individuals hospitalized and discharged for serious bacterial infections between October 1, 2015, and October 1, 2022, were included in the analysis. Data were analyzed from July 7, 2023, to February 28, 2025.

Intervention

Receipt of an laLGP (dalbavancin or oritavancin) vs SOC antibiotics.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary outcome measure was a composite of readmission, emergency department visit, and inpatient death or discharge to hospice within 90 days post discharge from the index admission. Analyses were stratified by PWUD and non-PWUD status. Clone censor weighting was used to emulate a per-protocol analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) of time to the composite event and 95% CIs were calculated using bootstrapping.

Results

Among 42 067 included individuals, median age was 61 (IQR, 47-73) years, 24 704 were male (58.7%), and 5047 (12.0%) were classified as PWUD. laLGPs were prescribed in 825 individuals (2.0%). There was no statistically significant difference in the composite outcome between the laLGP and SOC groups in both the PWUD (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.88-1.13) and non-PWUD (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86-1.00) participants.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study of laLGPs vs SOC, findings suggested that laLGPs were effective as step-down treatment of serious gram-positive bacterial infections, offering comparable outcomes to those of SOC antibiotics in PWUD and non-PWUD individuals. Clinicians may consider laLGPs as alternative step-down options to SOC antibiotics for the treatment of serious gram-positive bacterial infections.

Dalbavancin as sequential therapy in infective endocarditis: Real-life experience in elder and comorbid patients

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dalbavancin as sequential therapy in patients with infective endocarditis (IE) due to gram positive bacteria (GPB) in a real-life heterogenous cohort with comorbid patients.

METHODS

A single center retrospective cohort study including all patients with definite IE treated with dalbavancin between January 2017 and February 2022 was developed. A 6-month follow-up was performed. The main outcomes were clinical cure rate, clinical and microbiological relapse, 6-month mortality, and adverse effects (AEs) rate.

RESULTS

The study included 61 IE episodes. The median age was 78.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 63.2-85.2), 78.7% were male, with a median Charlson comorbidity index of 7 (IQR 4-9) points. Overall, 49.2% suffered native valve IE. The most common microorganism was Staphylococcus aureus (26.3%) followed by Enterococcus faecalis (21.3%). The median duration of initial antimicrobial therapy and dalbavancin therapy were 27 (IQR 20-34) and 14 days (IQR 14-28) respectively. The total reduction of hospitalization was 1090 days. The most frequent dosage was 1500mg of dalbavancin every 14 days (96.7%). An AE was detected in 8.2% of patients, only one (1.6%) was attributed to dalbavancin (infusion reaction). Clinical cure was achieved in 86.9% of patients. One patient (1.6%) with Enterococcus faecalis IE suffered relapse. The 6-month mortality was 11.5%, with only one IE-related death (1.6%).

CONCLUSION

This study shows a high efficacy of dalbavancin in a heterogeneous real-world cohort of IE patients, with an excellent safety profile. Dalbavancin allowed a substantial reduction of in-hospital length of stay.

Impact of first-line dalbavancin for cellulitis on hospital admissions and costs: A case series

BACKGROUND

Many patients with cellulitis are treated with oral antibiotics as outpatients, but some require hospital admission for intravenous antibiotics. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board in Wales approved use of dalbavancin as first-line intravenous antibiotic from April to December 2020 to facilitate early discharge and prevent hospital admission.

OBJECTIVES

To report cost savings and admission avoidance through first-line intravenous use of dalbavancin for cellulitis in one health board in Wales.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with cellulitis who presented to the emergency department or medical assessment unit at Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board's two hospitals between April and December 2020 were identified for treatment with dalbavancin, because they had not responded to oral antibiotics or their initial presentation warranted intravenous antibiotics. Patients received 1500 mg dalbavancin by intravenous infusion according to prescribing information and were sent home without being admitted. Outcomes were admission within 30 d of dalbavancin and cost savings from avoiding admission.

RESULTS

31 patients were treated with dalbavancin for cellulitis in the emergency department or medical assessment unit. No patient was admitted within 30 d of receiving dalbavancin. Use of dalbavancin is estimated to have saved 248 bed-days over the study period, with an estimated saving of $120,444.23 based on avoidance of admission. The cost of dalbavancin for these 31 patients was $69,959.08, giving an overall cost saving of $50,485.15 ($1529.95 per patient).

CONCLUSIONS

Prescribing dalbavancin as first-line intravenous antibiotic for cellulitis prevents admission, saving bed-days and admission-related costs.

Off-label use of dalbavancin in children: a case series

INTRODUCTION

Dalbavancin is an antibiotic active against most Gram-positive bacteria approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Owing to its long half-life, it is being increasingly used for other indications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present a case series of children and adolescents treated with dalbavancin for osteoarticular, catheter-related and other non-ABSSSI infections.

RESULTS

Dalbavancin was prescribed to 15 patients. Six (40%) were female and median age at prescription was 11.9 (IQR 1.3-18.0) years. Most of them (12/15) had significant comorbidities. Patients presented mainly with deep surgical site infections, osteoarticular infections and central-line-associated bloodstream infections. The most common isolate was Staphylococcus aureus followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Major reasons to prescribe dalbavancin were to ensure compliance and patients' convenience. Two patients discontinued the drug due to adverse events possibly related to it. The rest of the patients completed the treatment with dalbavancin, with a median duration of 56 days (IQR 17.5, 115.5). All achieved complete resolution and present no relapse after a median follow-up of 9.9 months (IQR 4.8, 16.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Dalbavancin was a safe, effective and convenient alternative in selected paediatric patients with complicated non-ABSSSI infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria.

Evaluation of two commercial broth microdilution systems for dalbavancin susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other resistant Gram-positive cocci

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate two commercial broth microdilution (BMD) systems, E1-185-100 (Merlin) and FDANDPF (ThermoFisher), for dalbavancin susceptibility testing in comparison with reference BMD assay.

METHODS

Study collection was composed of 200 non-replicate multidrug-resistant Gram-positive cocci of clinical origin, including 180 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 10 vancomycin-resistant enterococci, seven linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, and three methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. S. aureus ATCC 29213 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 reference strains were also included as controls. Testing was performed according to the ISO 20776-1 standard, starting from the same bacterial inoculum, and results were compared according to the ISO 20776-2 standard.

RESULTS

Reference BMD showed that 92.6% (187/202) of the strains were susceptible to dalbavancin, whereas few staphylococci and all VanA-producing enterococci showed a resistant phenotype. In comparison with the reference method, Category Agreement and Essential Agreement were 98% (198/202; 95% CI, 95.4-99.3%) and 98% (198/202; 95% CI, 95.4-99.3%) for both Merlin and ThermoFisher panels. A few false susceptibilities were observed, for both commercial systems, with dalbavancin-resistant staphylococci. BIAS values of 11% and 3% were calculated for the Merlin and ThermoFisher systems, respectively.

DISCUSSION

This study, reporting the first evaluation of the two commercially available BMD assays for dalbavancin susceptibility testing, revealed an overall good correlation with reference BMD, although with some underestimation tendency of MIC values by both commercial systems. Further studies involving a higher number of resistant isolates will be necessary to better evaluate this issue.

New advances in management and treatment of cardiac implantable electronic devices infections

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are increasingly used worldwide, and infection of these devices remains one of the most feared complications.CIED infections (CDIs) represent a challenge for physicians and the healthcare system in general as they require prolonged hospitalization and antibiotic treatment and are burdened by high mortality and high costs, so management of CDIs must be multidisciplinary.The exact incidence of CDIs is difficult to define, considering that it is influenced by various factors mainly represented by the implanted device and the type of procedure. Risk factors for CDIs could be divided into three categories: device related, patient related, and procedural related and the etiology is mainly sustained by Gram-positive bacteria; however, other etiologies cannot be underestimated. As a matter of fact, the two cornerstones in the treatment of these infections are device removal and antimicrobial treatment. Finally, therapeutic drug monitoring and PK/PD correlations should be encouraged in all patients with CDIs receiving antibiotic therapy and may result in a better clinical outcome and a reduction in antibiotic resistance and economic costs.In this narrative review, we look at what is new in the management of these difficult-to-treat infections.

Clinical, organizational, and pharmacoeconomic perspectives of dalbavancin vs standard of care in the infectious disease network

Introduction

The therapeutic approach to the patient with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) and complicated infections often involves the early transition from intravenous to oral therapy (early switch) or early discharge. Our study aimed to evaluate sustainable and innovative care models that can be transferred to community healthcare and the economic impact of dalbavancin therapy vs Standard of Care (SoC) therapy for the treatment of ABSSSI and other Gram-positive infections including those by multidrug-resistant organisms. We also described the organization of an infectious disease network that allows optimizing the treatment of ABSSSI and other complex infections with dalbavancin.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively studied all patients treated with dalbavancin in the University Hospital "S. Anna" of Ferrara, Italy, between November 2016 and December 2022. The clinical information of each patient was collected from the hospital's SAP database and used to evaluate the impact of dalbavancin in early discharge with reduction of length of stay promoting dehospitalization and in improving adherence to antibiotic therapy.

Results

A total of 287 patients (165 males and 122 females) were included in the study of which 62 were treated with dalbavancin. In 13/62 patients dalbavancin was administered in a single dose at the completion of therapy to facilitate early discharge. Assuming a 12-day hospitalization required for the treatment of ABSSSI or to complete the treatment of osteomyelitis or spondilodiscitis, the treatment with dalbavancin results in a cost reduction of more than €3,200 per single patient compared to SoC (dancomycin, linezolid or vancomycin).

Conclusions

Dalbavancin has proven to be a valid therapeutic aid in the organization of a territorial infectious disease network given its prolonged action, which allows the dehospitalization with management of even patients with complex infections in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

New Antimicrobials and New Therapy Strategies for Endocarditis: Weapons That Should Be Defended

The overall low-quality evidence concerning the clinical benefits of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE), which has made it difficult to strongly support or reject any regimen of antibiotic therapy, has led to a discrepancy between the available guidelines and clinical practice. In this complex scenario, very recently published guidelines have attempted to fill this gap. Indeed, in recent years several antimicrobials have entered the market, including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, and the long-acting lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin. Despite being approved for different indications, real-world data on their use for the treatment of IE, alone or in combination, has accumulated over time. Furthermore, an old antibiotic, fosfomycin, has gained renewed interest for the treatment of complicated infections such as IE. In this narrative review, we focused on new antimicrobials and therapeutic strategies that we believe may provide important contributions to the advancement of Gram-positive IE treatment, providing a summary of the current in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence supporting their use in clinical practice.

EN-DALBACEN 2.0 Cohort: real-life study of dalbavancin as sequential/consolidation therapy in patients with infective endocarditis due to Gram-positive cocci

OBJECTIVES

Infective endocarditis (IE) has high mortality and morbidity and requires long hospital stays to deliver the antibiotic treatment recommended in clinical practice guidelines. We aimed to analyse the health outcomes of the use of dalbavancin (DBV) in the consolidation treatment of IEs caused by Gram-positive cocci and to perform a pharmacoeconomic study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This observational, retrospective, Spanish multicentre study in patients with IE who received DBV as part of antibiotic treatment in consolidation phase were followed for at least 12 months. The study was approved by the Provincial Committee of the coordinating centre.

RESULTS

The study included 124 subjects, 70.2% male, with a mean age of 67.4 years and median Charlson index of 4 (interquartile range: 2.5-6). Criteria for definite IE were met by 91.1%. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (38.8%), Staphylococcus aureus (22.6%), Enterococcus faecalis (19.4%), and Streptococcus Spp. (9.7%) were isolated more frequently, all susceptible to vancomycin. Before DVB administration, 91.2% had undergone surgery; 60.5% had received a second regimen for 24.5 d (16.6-56); and 20.2% had received a third regimen for 14.5 d (12-19.5). DBV was administered to facilitate discharge in 95.2% of cases. At 12 months, the effectiveness was of 95.9%, and there was 0.8% loss to follow-up, 0.8% IE-related death, and 3.2% relapse. Adverse events were recorded in 3.2%. The hospital stay was reduced by 14 d, and there was a mean savings of 5548.57 €/patient vs. conventional treatments.

CONCLUSION

DBV is highly effective, safe, and cost-effective as consolidation therapy in patients with IE by Gram-positive cocci, with few adverse events.

Off-label use versus formal recommendations of conventional and novel antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria

The infections caused by multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant (MDR, XDR) bacteria, including Gram-positive cocci (GPC, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MDR-Streptococcus pneumoniae and vancomycin-resistant enterococci) and Gram-negative bacilli (GNB, including carbapenem-resistant [CR] Enterobacterales, CR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa and XDR/CR-Acinetobacter baumannii complex) can be quite challenging for physicians with respect to treatment decisions. Apart from complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections (cUTIs, cIAIs), bloodstream infections and pneumonia, these difficult-to-treat bacteria also cause infections at miscellaneous sites (bones, joints, native/prosthetic valves and skin structures, etc.). Antibiotics like dalbavancin, oritavancin, telavancin and daptomycin are currently approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structural infections (ABSSSIs) caused by GPC. Additionally, ceftaroline, linezolid and tigecycline have been formally approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and ABSSSI. Cefiderocol and meropenem-vaborbactam are currently approved for the treatment of cUTIs caused by XDR-GNB. The spectra of ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam are broader than that of ceftolozane-tazobactam, but these three antibiotics are currently approved for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, cIAIs and cUTIs caused by MDR-GNB. Clinical investigations of other novel antibiotics (including cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam and sulbactam-durlobactam) for the treatment of various infections are ongoing. Nevertheless, evidence for adequate antibiotic regimens against osteomyelitis, arthritis and infective endocarditis due to several GPC and MDR-GNB is still mostly lacking. A comprehensive review of PubMed publications was undertaken and the formal indications and off-label use of important conventional and novel antibiotics against MDR/XDR-GPC and GNB isolates cultured from miscellaneous sites are presented in this paper.

Dalbavancin as sequential therapy for infective endocarditis due to Gram-positive organisms: a review

Dalbavancin is a parenteral lipoglycopeptide antibiotic derived from teicoplanin, an analogue of vancomycin. It is mainly used for skin and soft tissue infections. The sustained half-life of approximately 14 days makes dalbavancin a novel option for potential use as sequential treatment in infections such as infective endocarditis, which require prolonged antibiotic courses. However, only a few studies have been reported in the literature, and the use of dalbavancin remains limited. This article is a review of the currently available literature using dalbavancin for the treatment of infective endocarditis due to Gram-positive organisms. Almost all patients received dalbavancin as sequential therapy following standard-of-care antibiotics. The overall clinical efficacy of dalbavancin was approximately 90%, and it appeared to be well tolerated.

Dalbavancin in clinical practice in Spain: a 2 year retrospective study

Objectives

Dalbavancin is approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) in adults. Its unique pharmacokinetic properties allow daily dosing to be avoided. The objective was to describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients treated with dalbavancin in Spain, and to evaluate its effectiveness and safety in real-world settings.

Patients and methods

This non-interventional, retrospective, observational and multicentre study included patients who received at least one dose between 2018 and 2019 in seven Spanish hospitals.

Results

In total, 187 patients were included. The most common comorbidities were cardiovascular disease (27.4%) and diabetes mellitus (23.5%). Dalbavancin was used to treat osteoarticular infections (28.3%), ABSSSIs (22.5%), cardiovascular infections (20.9%) and catheter-related infections (18.2%). The most prevalent pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (34.2%), CoNS (32.6%), and enterococci (12.8%). The main reason for use was early hospital discharge (65.8%). Most patients were treated with 1500 mg in a single dose (35.3%) and the median duration of treatment was 2 weeks. The treatment was clinically successful in 91.4% of cases. Six patients (3.2%) reported adverse events. Physicians agreed on the potential reduction of hospitalization days (85.3%). A subanalysis of patient characteristics and type of pathogen showed similar results in terms of efficacy and safety.

Conclusions

Dalbavancin seems to be effective and safe as second-line treatment in severe Gram-positive infections. It improves treatment adherence and allows outpatient management. Furthermore, the effectiveness and safety profile are maintained against diverse microorganisms in Gram-positive infections and regardless of the patients' comorbidities at baseline, or age.