1
|
Buzigi E, Pillay K, Siwela M, Mkhwanazi B, Ngidi M, Mahinda BM. Perceptions and Acceptability of a Low Phytate: Iron Molar Ratio Biofortified Bean and Sweet Potato Dish Among Pregnant Women in Rural Uganda. Nutrients 2025; 17:1641. [PMID: 40431381 DOI: 10.3390/nu17101641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2025] [Revised: 04/30/2025] [Accepted: 05/08/2025] [Indexed: 05/29/2025] Open
Abstract
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) disproportionately affects pregnant women who reside in low-income countries because they predominantly consume staple legumes and tubers such as conventional common beans (CCBs) and white-fleshed sweet potatoes (WFSPs). Such staples are either low in iron or rich in iron absorption inhibitors such as phytates. To fight IDA, a high-iron-biofortified common bean (IBCB) was introduced in Uganda. However, there is limited knowledge about its acceptability among pregnant women. This experimental crossover study determined the sensory acceptability of a low phytate:iron molar ratio dish, WFSP + IBCB (test food), against a high phytate:iron molar ratio dish, WFSP + CCB (control food), among pregnant women in rural Uganda. Their perceptions of consuming the test food during pregnancy were also explored. Methods: A total of 104 pregnant women participated in this study. The sensory attributes (taste, color, aroma, texture, and general acceptability) of the test and control foods were rated using a five-point facial hedonic scale ranging from "dislike very much", "dislike", "neutral", "like", to "like very much". An attribute was acceptable if the participant scored either "like" or "like very much". Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted to explore participant perceptions about the factors that may influence them to eat WFSP + IBCB during pregnancy. The chi-square test was used to detect the proportion difference for each sensory attribute within participants between test and control foods, while FGD data were analyzed by thematic analysis. Results: All the sensory attributes were acceptable to the participants and not significantly different between control and test foods (p > 0.05). Participants were willing to consume IBCB if it was affordable, sustainably available, and provided healthy pregnancy outcomes. Conclusions: The sensory attributes of the test food were equally accepted as the control food, suggesting that the consumption of WFSP + IBCB has the potential to replace WFSP + CCB among the study participants. The study participants showed positive perceptions of consuming IBCB if it was accessible, sustainable, affordable, and provided healthy pregnancy outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Buzigi
- Department of Community Health & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, Uganda
- Department of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg 3201, South Africa
- Department of Public Health & Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, Victoria University, Kampala P.O. Box 30866, Uganda
| | - Kirthee Pillay
- Department of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg 3201, South Africa
| | - Muthulisi Siwela
- Department of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg 3201, South Africa
| | - Blessing Mkhwanazi
- Department of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg 3201, South Africa
| | - Mjabuliseni Ngidi
- Department of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg 3201, South Africa
| | - Babra Muhindo Mahinda
- Department of Public Health & Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, Victoria University, Kampala P.O. Box 30866, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mmbando GS, Missanga J. The current status of genetic biofortification in alleviating malnutrition in Africa. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 2024; 22:100445. [PMID: 39674627 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2024.100445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2024] [Revised: 10/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/14/2024] [Indexed: 12/16/2024]
Abstract
Africa is a continent where undernutrition and micronutrient deficiencies are common and malnutrition is a major problem. Genetic biofortification (GB) offers a promising way to combat malnutrition. But little is still known about how widely used GB is in Africa today. This review explores the status, achievements, and challenges of GB on the continent today. It draws attention to the potential for enhanced nutritional results from biofortified crops that are enhanced with vital elements like zinc, iron, and vitamin A. Biofortification has a demonstrable positive effect on health and wellness, as evidenced by success stories from several African nations. However, obstacles like a lack of farmer awareness, difficulty obtaining biofortified seeds, and complicated regulations make adoption difficult. Research and collaboration advances hold the potential for increasing GB's effectiveness. This study offers guidance for the future and calls for coordinated efforts to implement GB programs to achieve a well-nourished Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gideon Sadikiel Mmbando
- Department of Biology, College of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, University of Dodoma, P. O. BOX 259, Dodoma, Tanzania.
| | - Julius Missanga
- Department of Biology, College of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, University of Dodoma, P. O. BOX 259, Dodoma, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Izquierdo P, Sadohara R, Wiesinger J, Glahn R, Urrea C, Cichy K. Genome-wide association and genomic prediction for iron and zinc concentration and iron bioavailability in a collection of yellow dry beans. Front Genet 2024; 15:1330361. [PMID: 38380426 PMCID: PMC10876999 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1330361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Dry bean is a nutrient-dense food targeted in biofortification programs to increase seed iron and zinc levels. The underlying assumption of breeding for higher mineral content is that enhanced iron and zinc levels will deliver health benefits to the consumers of these biofortified foods. This study characterized a diversity panel of 275 genotypes comprising the Yellow Bean Collection (YBC) for seed Fe and Zn concentration, Fe bioavailability (FeBio), and seed yield across 2 years in two field locations. The genetic architecture of each trait was elucidated via genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and the efficacy of genomic prediction (GP) was assessed. Moreover, 82 yellow breeding lines were evaluated for seed Fe and Zn concentrations as well as seed yield, serving as a prediction set for GP models. Large phenotypic variability was identified in all traits evaluated, and variations of up to 2.8 and 13.7-fold were observed for Fe concentration and FeBio, respectively. Prediction accuracies in the YBC ranged from a low of 0.12 for Fe concentration, to a high of 0.72 for FeBio, and an accuracy improvement of 0.03 was observed when a QTN, identified through GWAS, was used as a fixed effect for FeBio. This study provides evidence of the lack of correlation between FeBio estimated in vitro and Fe concentration and highlights the potential of GP in accurately predicting FeBio in yellow beans, offering a cost-effective alternative to the traditional assessment of using Caco2 cell methodologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo Izquierdo
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | - Rie Sadohara
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | - Jason Wiesinger
- USDA-ARS, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Ithaca, NY, United States
| | - Raymond Glahn
- USDA-ARS, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Ithaca, NY, United States
| | - Carlos Urrea
- Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Panhandle Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Scottsbluff, NE, United States
| | - Karen Cichy
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
- USDA-ARS, Sugarbeet and Bean Research Unit, East Lansing, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li J, Martin C, Fernie A. Biofortification's contribution to mitigating micronutrient deficiencies. NATURE FOOD 2024; 5:19-27. [PMID: 38168782 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-023-00905-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Biofortification was first proposed in the early 1990s as a low-cost, sustainable strategy to enhance the mineral and vitamin contents of staple food crops to address micronutrient malnutrition. Since then, the concept and remit of biofortification has burgeoned beyond staples and solutions for low- and middle-income economies. Here we discuss what biofortification has achieved in its original manifestation and the main factors limiting the ability of biofortified crops to improve micronutrient status. We highlight the case for biofortified crops with key micronutrients, such as provitamin D3/vitamin D3, vitamin B12 and iron, for recognition of new demographics of need. Finally, we examine where and how biofortification can be integrated into the global food system to help overcome hidden hunger, improve nutrition and achieve sustainable agriculture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Li
- Department of Biochemistry and Metabolism, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK
| | - Cathie Martin
- Department of Biochemistry and Metabolism, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK.
| | - Alisdair Fernie
- Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huey SL, Konieczynski EM, Mehta NH, Krisher JT, Bhargava A, Friesen VM, Mbuya MNN, Monterrosa EC, Nyangaresi AM, Mehta S. A systematic review of the impacts of post-harvest handling on provitamin A, iron and zinc retention in seven biofortified crops. NATURE FOOD 2023; 4:978-985. [PMID: 37945785 PMCID: PMC10661739 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-023-00874-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Post-harvest handling can affect micronutrient retention in biofortified crops through to the point of consumption. Here we conduct a systematic review identifying 67 articles examining the retention of micronutrients in conventionally bred biofortified maize, orange sweet potato, cassava, pearl millet, rice, beans and wheat. Provitamin A crops maintain high amounts compared with non-biofortified counterparts. Iron and zinc crops have more variability in micronutrient retention dependent on processing method; for maximum iron and zinc content, whole grain product consumption such as whole wheat flour or only slightly milled brown rice is beneficial. We offer preliminary suggestions for households, regulatory bodies and programme implementers to increase consumer awareness on best practices for preparing crops to maximize micronutrient content, while highlighting gaps in the literature. Our online, interactive Micronutrient Retention Dashboard ( https://www.cpnh.cornell.edu/mn-retention-db ) offers an at-a-glance view of the compiled minimum and maximum retention found, organized by processing method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha L Huey
- Center for Precision Nutrition and Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Program in International Nutrition, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Elsa M Konieczynski
- Center for Precision Nutrition and Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Neel H Mehta
- Center for Precision Nutrition and Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Jesse T Krisher
- Center for Precision Nutrition and Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Arini Bhargava
- Center for Precision Nutrition and Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Saurabh Mehta
- Center for Precision Nutrition and Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
- Program in International Nutrition, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
- Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Amongi W, Nkalubo ST, Ochwo-Ssemakula M, Badji A, Dramadri IO, Odongo TL, Nuwamanya E, Tukamuhabwe P, Izquierdo P, Cichy K, Kelly J, Mukankusi C. Phenotype based clustering, and diversity of common bean genotypes in seed iron concentration and cooking time. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0284976. [PMID: 37167229 PMCID: PMC10174564 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Common bean is the world's most important directly consumed legume food crop that is popular for calories, protein and micronutrients. It is a staple food in sub-Saharan Africa, and a significant source of iron for anemic people. However, several pests, soil and weather challenges still impede its production. Long cooking time, and high phytic acid and polyphenols that influence bioavailable iron also limit the health benefits. To inform population improvement strategies and selection decisions for resilient fast cooking and iron biofortified beans, the study determined diversity and population structure within 427 breeding lines, varieties, or landraces mostly from Alliance Uganda and Columbia. The genotypes were evaluated for days to flowering and physiological maturity, yield, seed iron (FESEED) and zinc (ZNSEED) and cooking time (COOKT). Data for all traits showed significant (P≤0.001) differences among the genotypes. Repeatability was moderate to high for most traits. Performance ranged from 52 to 87 ppm (FESEED), 23-38 ppm (ZNSEED), 36-361 minutes (COOKT), and 397-1299 kg/ha (yield). Minimal differences existed between the gene pools in the mean performance except in yield, where Mesoamerican beans were better by 117 kg/ha. The genotypes exhibited high genetic diversity and thus have a high potential for use in plant breeding. Improvement of FESEED and ZNSEED, COOKT and yield performance within some markets such as red and small white beans is possible. Hybridization across market classes especially for yellow beans is essential but this could be avoided by adding other elite lines to the population. Superior yielding and fast cooking, yellow and large white beans were specifically lacking. Adding Fe dense elite lines to the population is also recommended. The population was clustered into three groups that could be considered for specific breeding targets based on trait correlations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winnyfred Amongi
- Department of Agricultural Production, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- Alliance of Bioversity and CIAT, National Agricultural Research Laboratories Kawanda, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Mildred Ochwo-Ssemakula
- Alliance of Bioversity and CIAT, National Agricultural Research Laboratories Kawanda, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Arfang Badji
- National Crops Resources Research Institute (NaCRRI-NARO), Kampala, Uganda
- Makerere University Regional Center for Crop Improvement (MaRCCI), Collage of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Isaac Onziga Dramadri
- Department of Agricultural Production, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- Makerere University Regional Center for Crop Improvement (MaRCCI), Collage of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Thomas Lapaka Odongo
- Department of Agricultural Production, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Ephraim Nuwamanya
- Department of Agricultural Production, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Phineas Tukamuhabwe
- Department of Agricultural Production, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Paulo Izquierdo
- Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Karen Cichy
- Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
- USDA-ARS, Sugarbeet and Bean Research Unit, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
| | - James Kelly
- Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Clare Mukankusi
- Alliance of Bioversity and CIAT, National Agricultural Research Laboratories Kawanda, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jepleting N, N. Sila D, N. Orina I. Nutritional Composition and Antinutrient to Mineral Molar Ratios of Selected Improved Common Beans Grown in Kenya. CURRENT RESEARCH IN NUTRITION AND FOOD SCIENCE JOURNAL 2022. [DOI: 10.12944/crnfsj.10.3.35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
A decline in common bean production has been ascribed to climate change. The adoption of improved beans aims to increase productivity, profitability, and consumption, thus reducing food and nutrition insecurity in the country. The aim of this study was to determine the proximate composition, antinutrient content, mineral content, and bioaccessibility of zinc and iron in two improved bean varieties grown in Kenya; Faida (biofortified) and RM 01 (drought tolerant)). The protein content of RM 01 (22.48%) was significantly higher than the Faida bean variety (20.90%). RM 01 bean variety had higher crude fat (4.20%) and crude fiber (4.31%) content compared to Faida which had 3.78% and 3.31% for crude fat and crude fiber respectively. Faida recorded significantly higher levels of iron (61.5 mg/kg) and zinc (26.8 mg/kg) content. Faida beans also had significantly (p< 0.05) high levels of phytates (11.70 mg/g) and tannins (4.39 mg CE/g). Phytate to iron ratio for Faida was 17.08 and RM 01 was 15.19 while the phytate-to-zinc ratio was 42.26 and 35.36 for Faida and RM 01 respectively. The RM 01 bean variety had iron bioaccessibility of 35% and zinc bioaccessibility of 65% compared to the Faida bean variety which had bioaccessibility of 29% and 42% for iron and zinc respectively. In conclusion, RM 01 variety is a better source of iron, zinc, and protein compared to the Faida variety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Jepleting
- Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Daniel N. Sila
- Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Irene N. Orina
- Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang YY, Stockmann R, Ng K, Ajlouni S. The role of legume peptides released during different digestion stages in modulating the bioaccessibility of exogenous iron and zinc: An in-vitro study. Curr Res Food Sci 2021; 4:737-745. [PMID: 34729500 PMCID: PMC8545669 DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The effects of legume protein fractions on Fe and Zn bioaccessibility remain equivocal to date, largely due to the protein’s structure and the presence of anti-nutritional compounds. We administered Fe and Zn salts with legume concentrates consisting mainly of albumin or globulin from lupin, pea and faba to in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Under the fasted intestinal state, faba globulins were found to enhance Fe2+ and Zn solubility compared to control salts without legume proteins. Meanwhile, other fractions had no effect or significantly lowered Fe and Zn solubility. Under the fed intestinal state, the presence globulins enhanced Fe solubility versus the control, where protein solubilization due to high bile concentration likely played a role in circumventing precipitation. The lupin albumin fraction significantly enhanced Fe2+ and Zn solubility, whilst other fractions generally reduced Zn solubility under fed state. Our results highlight the complex role of legume proteins towards Fe and Zn solubility. Bioaccessibility of Fe/Zn mineral salts were examined with and without legume protein fractions. Bile concentrations and/or digestion time affected Fe3+/Fe2+ and Zn solubility in presence of legume protein fractions. Globulins consistently enhanced Fe2+, but not Fe3+ solubility during the high-bile (fed state) intestinal digestion phase. Both enhancements and reductions in Zn solubility were reflected by different legume fractions. A non-linear relationship was observed between soluble protein and Fe/Zn bioaccessibility during simulated digestion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yianna Y Zhang
- School of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.,CSIRO Agriculture & Food, 671 Sneydes Road, Werribee, VIC, 3030, Australia
| | - Regine Stockmann
- CSIRO Agriculture & Food, 671 Sneydes Road, Werribee, VIC, 3030, Australia
| | - Ken Ng
- School of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
| | - Said Ajlouni
- School of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wafula EN, Onduso M, Wainaina IN, Buvé C, Kinyanjui PK, Githiri SM, Saeys W, Sila DN, Hendrickx M. Antinutrient to mineral molar ratios of raw common beans and their rapid prediction using near-infrared spectroscopy. Food Chem 2021; 368:130773. [PMID: 34399183 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
The presence of antinutrients in common beans negatively affects mineral bioavailability. Therefore, this study aimed to predict the antinutrient to mineral molar ratios (proxy-indicators of in vitro mineral bioavailability) of a wide range of raw bean types, using near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. Iron, zinc, phytate and tannin concentrations and, antinutrient to mineral molar ratios were determined. Next, model calibration using NIR spectra from milled beans was performed. This entailed wavelength selection, pre-processing and partial least squares regression. Bean type had a significant effect on tannin content. The average values of phytate to iron (Phy:Fe), phytate to zinc (Phy:Zn), tannins to iron (Tan:Fe) and phytate and tannins to iron (Phy + Tan:Fe) MRs were 27.6, 61.7, 16.0 and 43.6, respectively. With determination coefficients for test set prediction above 75%, the PLS-R models for Phy:Zn, Tan:Fe and Phy + Tan:Fe molar ratios are useful for screening purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Nakhungu Wafula
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems (M(2)S), Laboratory of Food Technology, Kasteelpark Arenberg 22, Box 2457, 3001 Leuven, Belgium; Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Department of Food Science and Technology, P.O. Box 62, 000-00200 Nairobi, Kenya.
| | - Mercyline Onduso
- Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Department of Food Science and Technology, P.O. Box 62, 000-00200 Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Irene Njoki Wainaina
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems (M(2)S), Laboratory of Food Technology, Kasteelpark Arenberg 22, Box 2457, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carolien Buvé
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems (M(2)S), Laboratory of Food Technology, Kasteelpark Arenberg 22, Box 2457, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Kahenya Kinyanjui
- Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Department of Food Science and Technology, P.O. Box 62, 000-00200 Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Stephen Mwangi Githiri
- Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, School of Agriculture and Environmental Resources, Department of Horticulture and Food Security, P.O. Box 62, 000-00200 Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Wouter Saeys
- KU Leuven, Department of Biosystems (BIOSYST), Division of Mechatronics, Biostatistics and Sensors (MeBios), Kasteelpark Arenberg30, Box 2456, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniel Ndaka Sila
- Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Department of Food Science and Technology, P.O. Box 62, 000-00200 Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Marc Hendrickx
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems (M(2)S), Laboratory of Food Technology, Kasteelpark Arenberg 22, Box 2457, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Glahn RP, Noh H. Redefining Bean Iron Biofortification: A Review of the Evidence for Moving to a High Fe Bioavailability Approach. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.682130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Iron biofortification of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) commenced in earnest ~18 years ago. Based on knowledge at the time, the biofortification approach for beans was simply to breed for increased Fe concentration based on 3 major assumptions: (1) The average bean Fe concentration is ~50 μg/g; (2) Higher Fe concentration results in more bioavailable Fe delivered for absorption; (3) Breeding for high Fe concentration is a trait that can be achieved through traditional breeding and is sustainable once a high Fe bean sample is released to farmers. Current research indicates that the assumptions of the high Fe breeding approach are not met in countries of East Africa, a major focus area of bean Fe biofortification. Thus, there is a need to redefine bean Fe biofortification. For assumption 1, recent research indicates that the average bean Fe concentration in East Africa is 71 μg/g, thus about 20 μg/g higher than the assumed value. For assumption 2, recent studies demonstrate that for beans higher Fe concentration does not always equate to more Fe absorption. Finally, for assumption 3, studies show a strong environment and genotype by environment effect on Fe concentration, thus making it difficult to develop and sustain high Fe concentrations. This paper provides an examination of the available evidence related to the above assumptions, and offers an alternative approach utilizing tools that focus on Fe bioavailability to redefine Fe biofortification of the common bean.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wright TIC, Gardner KA, Glahn RP, Milner MJ. Genetic control of iron bioavailability is independent from iron concentration in a diverse winter wheat mapping population. BMC PLANT BIOLOGY 2021; 21:212. [PMID: 33975563 PMCID: PMC8112066 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-02996-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anemia is thought to affect up to 1.6 billion people worldwide. One of the major contributors to low iron (Fe) absorption is a higher proportion of cereals compared to meats and pulse crops in people's diets. This has now become a problem in both the developed and developing world, as a result of both modern food choice and food availability. Bread wheat accounts for 20 % of the calories consumed by humans and is an important source of protein, vitamins and minerals meaning it could be a major vehicle for bringing more bioavailable Fe into the diet. RESULTS To investigate whether breeding for higher concentrations of Fe in wheat grains could help increase Fe absorption, a multiparent advanced generation intercross (MAGIC) population, encompassing more than 80 % of UK wheat polymorphism, was grown over two seasons in the UK. The population was phenotyped for both Fe concentration and Fe bioavailability using an established Caco-2 cell bioassay. It was found that increasing Fe concentrations in the grains was not correlated with higher Fe bioavailability and that the underlying genetic regions controlling grain Fe concentrations do not co-localise with increased Fe absorption. Furthermore, we show that phytate concentrations do not correlate with Fe bioavailability in our wheat population and thus phytate-binding is insufficient to explain the lack of correlation between Fe bioavailability and Fe concentrations in the wheat grain. Finally, we observed no (Fe bioavailability) or low (Fe concentration) correlation between years for these traits, confirming that both are under strong environmental influence. CONCLUSIONS This suggests that breeders will have to select not only for Fe concentrations directly in grains, but also increased bioavailability. However the use of numerous controls and replicated trials limits the practicality of adoption of screening by Caco-2 cells by many breeders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Raymond P Glahn
- Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, USDA-ARS, 14853, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Katuuramu DN, Wiesinger JA, Luyima GB, Nkalubo ST, Glahn RP, Cichy KA. Investigation of Genotype by Environment Interactions for Seed Zinc and Iron Concentration and Iron Bioavailability in Common Bean. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2021; 12:670965. [PMID: 34040625 PMCID: PMC8141707 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.670965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Iron and zinc malnutrition are global public health concerns afflicting mostly infants, children, and women in low- and middle-income countries with widespread consumption of plant-based diets. Common bean is a widely consumed staple crop around the world and is an excellent source of protein, fiber, and minerals including iron and zinc. The development of nutrient-dense common bean varieties that deliver more bioavailable iron and zinc with a high level of trait stability requires a measurement of the contributions from genotype, environment, and genotype by environment interactions. In this research, we investigated the magnitude of genotype by environment interaction for seed zinc and iron concentration and seed iron bioavailability (FeBIO) using a set of nine test genotypes and three farmers' local check varieties. The research germplasm was evaluated for two field seasons across nine on-farm locations in three agro-ecological zones in Uganda. Seed zinc concentration ranged from 18.0 to 42.0 μg g-1 and was largely controlled by genotype, location, and the interaction between location and season [28.0, 26.2, and 14.7% of phenotypic variability explained (PVE), respectively]. Within a genotype, zinc concentration ranged on average 12 μg g-1 across environments. Seed iron concentration varied from 40.7 to 96.7 μg g-1 and was largely controlled by genotype, location, and the interaction between genotype, location, and season (25.7, 17.4, and 13.7% of PVE, respectively). Within a genotype, iron concentration ranged on average 28 μg g-1 across environments. Seed FeBIO ranged from 8 to 116% of Merlin navy control and was largely controlled by genotype (68.3% of PVE). The red mottled genotypes (Rozi Koko and Chijar) accumulated the most seed zinc and iron concentration, while the yellow (Ervilha and Cebo Cela) and white (Blanco Fanesquero) genotypes had the highest seed FeBIO and performed better than the three farmers' local check genotypes (NABE-4, NABE-15, and Masindi yellow). The genotypes with superior and stable trait performance, especially the Manteca seed class which combine high iron and zinc concentrations with high FeBIO, would serve as valuable parental materials for crop improvement breeding programs aimed at enhancing the nutritional value of the common bean.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis N. Katuuramu
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
- USDA – ARS, U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Jason A. Wiesinger
- USDA – ARS, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Ithaca, NY, United States
| | - Gabriel B. Luyima
- Legumes Research Program, National Crops Resources Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Stanley T. Nkalubo
- Legumes Research Program, National Crops Resources Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Raymond P. Glahn
- USDA – ARS, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Ithaca, NY, United States
| | - Karen A. Cichy
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
- USDA – ARS, Sugarbeet and Bean Research Unit, East Lansing, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anderson GJ. Iron Biofortification: Who Gives a Bean? J Nutr 2020; 150:2841-2842. [PMID: 33025000 DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxaa268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory J Anderson
- Iron Metabolism Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|