Association Between Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act and Survival Among Newly Diagnosed Cancer Patients

Medicaid Expansion is Associated with Differences in Local Therapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act aimed to expand healthcare access, improve quality, and reduce costs. The effects of Medicaid expansion on receipt of local therapy for lung cancer are unknown.

METHODS

We utilized the National Cancer Database to conduct a retrospective analysis of patients with clinical T1-2, N0, M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without neoadjuvant treatment. Patients living in Medicaid expansion states as of January 2014 were compared with patients in non-expansion states between 2010 and 2013 (pre-expansion) and 2016 and 2019 (post-expansion). A difference-in-difference (DID) analysis was used to compare rates of surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

RESULTS

Among 149,966 patients, there were 80,514 patients (53.6%) in Medicaid non-expansion states and 69,452 patients (46.3%) in expansion states. Receipt of local therapy (surgery or SBRT) {- 1.6% vs. - 2.8%, DID 1.24% [confidence interval (CI) 0.45-2.02%]} and receipt of surgery (- 7.9% vs. - 9.3%, DID 1.4% [0.46-2.4%]) decreased at a lesser rate in expansion states between 2010-2013 and 2016-2019. Among patients with Medicaid, receipt of local therapy (surgery or SBRT) and surgery increased at a greater rate in expansion states with a stronger treatment effect (18.9% vs. 1.1%, DID 7.8% [76.12-9.4%]; 8.1 vs. 0.12%, DID 8.0% [6.3-9.66%]). Patients who traveled >10 miles decreased at a greater rate in expansion states (3.7% vs. 5.1%, DID - 1.5% [- 2.46 to - 0.35%]).

CONCLUSION

Based on Medicaid expansion status, states have different changes in local therapy rates for NSCLC. Our data suggest that Medicaid expansion may increase healthcare access in the receipt of first-line treatment for early-stage NSCLC.

Association of Policy With Palliative Care Uptake in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

BACKGROUND

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma presents substantial symptom burdens in advanced stages, yet only a small fraction of patients receive palliative care (PC). Medicaid expansion and state-specific PC policies may influence PC uptake in this population.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the impact of Medicaid expansion and state-level PC laws on PC utilization among patients with stage III and IV HNC across the United States.

METHODS

Using 2015-2020 National Cancer Database (NCDB) data, we identified deceased HNC patients with stage III or IV cancer and prognoses under 6 months. Using adjusted logistic regression, we analyzed the role of Medicaid expansion in PC utilization. Additionally, the Yale Palliative Care GPS was used to assess the distribution of state PC laws.

RESULTS

Of 10 305 eligible patients, 69.7% were from Medicaid expansion states. Medicaid expansion (aOR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01-1.49), higher Charles Comorbidity Index (CCI ≥ 3 vs. CCI = 1, aOR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.16-2.81), and later years were associated with increased PC use. Geographic differences in PC law implementation were observed, with the West having the most enacted/passed laws while the Northeast had the highest PC utilization rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid expansion and specific state PC laws positively impact PC access for advanced HNC patients. These findings underscore the potential of policy interventions in enhancing PC accessibility and utilization among vulnerable cancer populations.

Quality of gastrointestinal surgical oncology care according to insurance status

BACKGROUND

Despite efforts to expand insurance coverage, substantial inequalities persist, particularly in cancer treatment. This study aimed to evaluate whether quality disparities exist across major insurance plans for patients undergoing curative-intent resection for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with GI malignant neoplasms between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020. The primary tumor organ sites include the anus, colon, esophagus, gallbladder, liver, other biliary organ, pancreas, peritoneum, rectum, rectosigmoid, small intestine, and stomach. Multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate the effect of insurance status on resection margin, adequacy of lymphadenectomy, and receipt of lymphadenectomy. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 1,084,555 patients in this study, 594,013 (54.8%) had Medicare insurance, 380,287 (35.1%) had private insurance, 57,402 (5.3%) had Medicaid insurance, and 29,133 (2.7%) were uninsured. Privately insured patients were more likely to have negative margins (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.10) and adequate lymphadenectomies (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.06) than Medicare-insured patients. Uninsured patients were the least likely to have negative margins (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.75-0.81) and adequate lymphadenectomies (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99) than Medicare-insured patients. Non-Medicare-insured patients were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy, whereas Medicare-insured patients had higher omission rates because of comorbidities. Finally, multivariate survival analysis showed that Medicare-insured patients had a 14% increased risk of death compared with non-Medicare-insured patients.

CONCLUSION

Significant disparities in the quality of surgical oncology care exist based on insurance status. Healthcare policy interventions may be necessary to ensure equitable access to high-quality surgical GI cancer care in the United States.

Impact of medicaid expansion on screenable versus non-screenable gastrointestinal cancers

BACKGROUND

Medicaid expansion afforded increased healthcare access to low-income Americans contributing to a positive impact on cancer outcomes. However, it is unclear if these benefits were mainly due to enhanced access to cancer screening and earlier diagnosis versus access to cancer treatment METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried between 2010 and 2021 for Medicaid and uninsured patients with GI malignancies. Patients were stratified by screenable (SGI) and non-screenable (NGI) cancers and expansion state (ES) categories: early (EES) and late (LES) adopters, and non-expansion state (NES) cohorts. Statistical analyses, including difference-in-difference (DiD) and adjusted models, assessed the impact of Medicaid expansion on stage at diagnosis.

RESULTS

There were 230,159 pre-expansion and 539,028 post-expansion patients. There was an increase in Medicaid coverage (14.8 % vs. 11.1 %) and a concomitant decline in the uninsured population (5.3 % vs. 8.2 %) in the post-expansion era. For SGI cancers, Medicaid expansion was associated with significantly lower mean stage at diagnosis (DiD Coef. -0.12; p < 0.01). For NGI cancers, Medicaid expansion was associated with a lower mean stage at diagnosis but with much smaller coefficient (DiD Coef. -0.015; p < 0.01). Comparing EES and LES to NES, EES had more impact on lower mean stage at diagnosis (vs NES DiD Coef. -0.16; p < 0.01) compared to LES (vs NES DiD Coef. -0.02; p = 0.04) for SGI cancers. For NGI cancers, there was a modest reduction in mean stage at diagnosis only for EES (vs NES DiD Coef. -0.04; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Medicaid expansion, particularly for SGI cancers and early adopters, had a profound impact in lowering the mean stage at diagnosis. This emphasizes that long-term advantages of providing access to preventive care and screening, and thus earlier treatment, may be one of the main mechanisms of Medicaid expansion on improving cancer outcomes for GI malignancies.

POLICY SUMMARY

To establish the benefits of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act 2010 for gastrointestinal cancer patients particularly in screening.

The lasting impact of the ACA: how Medicaid expansion reduces outcome disparities in AYAs with leukemia and lymphoma

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), fully implemented in 2014, introduced reforms to Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), aiming to enhance health care access for vulnerable populations. Key provisions that can influence health outcomes in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with blood cancers include Medicaid expansion, which covers adults with income less than or equal to 138% of the federal poverty level based on modified adjusted gross income (MAGI), streamlined eligibility and enrollment processes, CHIP and Medicaid integration, and dependent coverage reform. Non-MAGI eligibility pathways based on age, disability, or waiver programs provide alternative routes for Medicaid coverage. By improving insurance coverage, providing affordable care and financial protection, and addressing health-related social needs such as transportation to care, Medicaid expansion has the potential to mitigate outcome disparities along the continuum of AYA blood cancer care. However, challenges persist due to coverage gaps in nonexpansion states, complexities in administrative processes to maintain continuous coverage, and barriers to accessing specialists for complex, AYA-focused multidisciplinary cancer care. The ending of the COVID-19 public health emergency's Medicaid Continuous Enrollment Provision has disrupted coverage for many AYAs. Given limited research evaluating the impact of the ACA on AYA blood cancer outcomes, more evidence is needed to guide future policies tailored to this vulnerable population. Despite encouraging progress following the ACA, continued collaborative efforts between policymakers, health care providers, patient advocates, and researchers are essential for identifying targeted strategies to ensure continuous and affordable coverage, access to specialized and coordinated care, and fewer disparities in AYA blood cancer outcomes.

Pediatric Ewing Sarcoma Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes Across Sociodemographic Groups

INTRODUCTION

In this study, we evaluate the association between sociodemographics and disease presentation, treatment, and survival for children, adolescents, and young adults with Ewing sarcoma.

METHODS

Case-level data were downloaded from The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cases included patients ages 0-24 who were diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma between 2004 and 2020.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred forty four patients were included in the analysis. When compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, Hispanic patients were more likely to present with tumors ≥8 cm (odds ratio (OR) = 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.24-2.36) and metastases (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.23-2.20). Black patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.07-0.97). The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 73% for NHW patients, 65% for Black patients, 67% for Asian patients and 66% for Hispanic patients. When accounting for confounding factors, Hispanic and Asian patients had higher probabilities of death due to cancer compared to NHW patients (HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.10-1.81; HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.09-2.48, respectively). Young adults and adolescents were significantly more likely to present with metastases, experience ≥1 month between diagnosis and treatment, and had lower survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in Ewing sarcoma presentation, treatment, and survival were observed across age groups and race/ethnicity. Future work should focus on expanding access to care in underserved groups. Further qualitative studies could assist in determining the exact factors that prevent patients from accessing care or examine how genetic factors that contribute to Ewing sarcoma severity differ across demographic groups.

Medicaid expansion in California and breast cancer incidence across neighborhoods with varying social vulnerabilities

PURPOSE

To investigate changes in breast cancer incidence rates associated with Medicaid expansion in California.

METHODS

We extracted yearly census tract-level population counts and cases of breast cancer diagnosed among women aged between 20 and 64 years in California during years 2010-2017. Census tracts were classified into low, medium and high groups according to their social vulnerability index (SVI). Using a difference-in-difference (DID) approach with Poisson regression models, we estimated the incidence rate, incidence rate ratio (IRR) during the pre- (2010-2013) and post-expansion periods (2014-2017), and the relative IRR (DID estimates) across three groups of neighborhoods.

RESULTS

Prior to the Medicaid expansion, the overall incidence rate was 93.61, 122.03, and 151.12 cases per 100,000 persons among tracts with high, medium, and low-SVI, respectively; and was 96.49, 122.07, and 151.66 cases per 100,000 persons during the post-expansion period, respectively. The IRR between high and low vulnerability neighborhoods was 0.62 and 0.64 in the pre- and post-expansion period, respectively, and the relative IRR was 1.03 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.06, p = 0.026). In addition, significant DID estimate was only found for localized breast cancer (relative IRR = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.09, p = 0.049) between high and low-SVI neighborhoods, not for regional and distant cancer stage.

CONCLUSIONS

The Medicaid expansion had differential impact on breast cancer incidence across neighborhoods in California, with the most pronounced increase found for localized cancer stage in high-SVI neighborhoods. Significant pre-post change was only found for localized breast cancer between high and low-SVI neighborhoods.

Impact of Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on lung cancer care in the US

Background

Healthcare disparities significantly affect access to care and outcomes in lung cancer patients. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion (ME) was enacted with the aim of improving access to quality and affordable healthcare. This study aims to determine the impact of ME on access to care and outcomes for patients with lung cancer.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of adults (ages 40-64 years) diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the National Cancer Database between 2009-2019. The study population was divided into a pre-expansion era (A: 2009-2013) and a post-expansion era (B: 2015-2019). The exposure of interest was residence in a state that expanded Medicaid in 2014 (ME) vs. non-expansion (NE). Outcomes were insurance coverage, clinical stage at diagnosis, treatment facility, and survival. Propensity score analysis was used to determine the association between ME and survival.

Results

A total of 202,003 patients were included (era B, 51.6%). The median age was 58 years, the majority of patients were male (53.0%), White (79.7%), had no comorbidities (62.0%) and adenocarcinoma (57.4%). From era A to B, insurance coverage increased to 96.7% (+6.6%), stage I disease to 25.3% (+6.5%), and treatment at an academic facility to 43.9% (+3.5%) in the ME group. For the NE group, the increases were up to 88.3% (+4.3%), 21.6% (+4.0%), and 28.6% (+0.2%), respectively. The increase in stage I cancer diagnosis was most noticeable in females. Following risk adjustment, era B was associated with an improvement in survival outcomes irrespective of ME status.

Conclusions

Disparities in lung cancer care seem to have improved after ME. Ongoing monitoring is still necessary to confirm the program's long-term impact on lung cancer survival.

Association Between State Medicaid Policies and Accrual of Black or Hispanic Patients to Cancer Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

It is unknown whether Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or state-level policies mandating Medicaid coverage of the routine costs of clinical trial participation have ameliorated longstanding racial and ethnic disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional difference-in-differences analysis examining the effect of Medicaid expansion on rates of enrollment for Black or Hispanic nonelderly adults in nonobservational, US cancer clinical trials using data from Medidata's Rave platform for 2012-2019. We examined heterogeneity in this effect on the basis of whether states had pre-existing mandates requiring Medicaid coverage of the routine costs of clinical trial participation.

RESULTS

The study included 47,870 participants across 1,353 clinical trials and 344 clinical trial sites. In expansion states, the proportion of participants who were Black or Hispanic increased from 16.7% before expansion to 17.2% after Medicaid expansion (0.5 percentage point [PP] change [95% CI, -1.1 to 2.0]). In nonexpansion states, this proportion increased from 19.8% before 2014 (when the first states expanded eligibility under the ACA) to 20.4% after 2014 (0.6 PP change [95% CI, -2.3 to 3.5]). These trends yielded a nonsignificant difference-in-differences estimate of 0.9 PP (95% CI, -2.6 to 4.4). Medicaid expansion was associated with a 5.3 PP (95% CI, 1.9 to 8.7) increase in the enrollment of Black or Hispanic participants in states with mandates requiring Medicaid coverage of the routine costs of trial participation, but not in states without mandates (-0.3 PP [95% CI, -4.5 to 3.9]).

CONCLUSION

Medicaid expansion was not associated with a significant increase in the proportion of Black or Hispanic oncology trial participants overall, but was associated with an increase specifically in states that mandated Medicaid coverage of the routine costs of trial participation.

Health-related social needs, medical financial hardship, and mortality risk among cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors may face challenges affording food, housing, and other living necessities, which are known as health-related social needs (HRSNs). However, little is known about the associations of HRSNs and mortality risk among adult cancer survivors.

METHODS

Adult cancer survivors were identified from the 2013-2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and linked with the NHIS Mortality File with vital status through December 31, 2019. HRSNs, measured by food insecurity, and nonmedical financial worries (e.g., housing costs), was categorized as severe, moderate, and minor/none. Medical financial hardship, including material, psychological, and behavioral domains, was categorized as 2-3, 1, or 0 domains. Using age as the time scale, the associations of HRSNs and medical financial hardship and mortality risk were assessed with weighted adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among cancer survivors 18-64 years old (n = 5855), 25.5% and 18.3% reported moderate and severe levels of HRSNs, respectively; among survivors 65-79 years old (n = 5918), 15.6% and 6.6% reported moderate and severe levels of HRSNs, respectively. Among cancer survivors 18-64 years old, severe HRSNs was associated with increased mortality risk (hazards ratio [HR], 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-2.93, p < .001; reference = minor/none) in adjusted analyses. Among cancer survivors 65-79 years old, 2-3 domains of medical financial hardship was associated with increased mortality risk (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.13-2.20, p = .007; reference = 0 domain).

CONCLUSIONS

HSRNs and financial hardship are associated with increased mortality risk among cancer survivors; comprehensive assessment of HRSN and financial hardship connecting patients with relevant services can inform efforts to mitigate adverse consequences of cancer.

Associations of State Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Eligibility Policies With Mammography

PURPOSE

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) addresses food insecurity for low-income households, which is associated with access to care. Many US states expanded SNAP access through policies eliminating the asset test (ie, restrictions based on SNAP applicant assets) and/or broadening income eligibility. The objective of this study was to determine whether state SNAP policies were associated with the use of mammography among women eligible for breast cancer screening.

METHODS

Data for income-eligible women 40 to 79 years of age were obtained from the 2006 to 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Difference-in-differences analyses were conducted to compare changes in the percentage of mammography in the past year from pre- to post-SNAP policy adoption (asset test elimination or income eligibility increase) between states that and did not adopt policies expanding SNAP eligibility.

RESULTS

In total, 171,684 and 294,647 income-eligible female respondents were included for the asset test elimination policy and income eligibility increase policy analyses, respectively. Mammography within 1 year was reported by 58.4%. Twenty-eight and 22 states adopted SNAP asset test elimination and income increase policies, respectively. Adoption of asset test elimination policies was associated with a 2.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-4.15; P = .043) percentage point increase in mammography received within 1 year, particularly for nonmetropolitan residents (4.14 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.07-7.21 percentage points; P = .008), those with household incomes <$25,000 (2.82 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.68-4.97 percentage points; P = .01), and those residing in states in the South (3.08 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.17-5.99 percentage points; P = .038) or that did not expand Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (3.35 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.36-6.34; P = .028). There was no significant association between mammography and state-level policies broadening of SNAP income eligibility.

CONCLUSIONS

State policies eliminating asset test requirements for SNAP eligibility were associated with increased mammography among low-income women eligible for breast cancer screening, particularly for those in the lowest income bracket or residing in nonmetropolitan areas or Medicaid nonexpansion states.

Trends in volumes and survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation in racial/ethnic minorities

ABSTRACT

There has been an increase in volume as well as an improvement in overall survival (OS) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for hematologic disorders. It is unknown if these changes have affected racial/ethnic minorities equally. In this observational study from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research of 79 904 autologous (auto) and 65 662 allogeneic (allo) HCTs, we examined the volume and rates of change of autoHCT and alloHCT over time and trends in OS in 4 racial/ethnic groups: non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs), non-Hispanic African Americans (NHAAs), and Hispanics across 5 2-year cohorts from 2009 to 2018. Rates of change were compared using Poisson model. Adjusted and unadjusted Cox proportional hazards models examined trends in mortality in the 4 racial/ethnic groups over 5 study time periods. The rates of increase in volume were significantly higher for Hispanics and NHAAs vs NHW for both autoHCT and alloHCT. Adjusted overall mortality after autoHCT was comparable across all racial/ethnic groups. NHAA adults (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.22; P = .004) and pediatric patients (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.3-2.03; P < .001) had a higher risk of mortality after alloHCT than NHWs. Improvement in OS over time was seen in all 4 groups after both autoHCT and alloHCT. Our study shows the rate of change for the use of autoHCT and alloHCT is higher in NHAAs and Hispanics than in NHWs. Survival after autoHCT and alloHCT improved over time; however, NHAAs have worse OS after alloHCT, which has persisted. Continued efforts are needed to mitigate disparities for patients requiring alloHCT.

Impact of the Implementation of the Affordability Care Act on Gastric Cancer Survival Rates

Introduction  Gastric cancer, a significant public health concern, remains one of the most challenging malignancies to treat effectively. In the United States, survival rates for gastric cancer have historically been low, partly due to late-stage diagnosis and disparities in access to care. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) sought to address such disparities by expanding healthcare coverage and improving access to preventive and early treatment services.  Objective This study aims to determine the causal effects of the ACA's implementation on gastric cancer survival rates, focusing on a comparative analysis between two distinct U.S. states: New Jersey, which fully embraced ACA provisions, and Georgia, which has not adopted the policy, as of 2023.  Methods In this retrospective analysis, we utilized data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) registry to assess the impact of the ACA on cancer-specific survival (CSS) among gastric cancer patients. The study spanned the period from 2000 to 2020, divided into pre-ACA (2000-2013) and post-ACA (2016-2020) periods, with a two-year washout (2013-2015). We compared Georgia (a non-expansion state) to New Jersey (an expansion state since 2014) using a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) approach. We adjusted for patient demographics, income, metropolitan status, disease stage, and treatment modalities.  Results Among 25,061 patients, 58.7% were in New Jersey (14,711), while 41.3% were in Georgia (10,350). The pre-ACA period included 18,878 patients (40.0% in Georgia and 60.0% in New Jersey), and 6,183 patients were in the post-ACA period (45.2% in Georgia and 54.8% in New Jersey). The post-ACA period was associated with a 20% reduction in mortality hazard among gastric cancer patients, irrespective of the state of residence (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.88). Patients who were residents of New Jersey experienced a 12% reduction in mortality hazard compared to those who resided in Georgia in the post-ACA period (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.99). Other factors linked to improved survival outcomes included surgery (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.28-0.34) and female gender (OR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.76-0.91).  Conclusion The study underscores the ACA's potential positive impact on CSS among gastric cancer patients, emphasizing the importance of healthcare policy interventions in improving patient outcomes.

Cancer diagnosis and treatment in working-age adults: Implications for employment, health insurance coverage, and financial hardship in the United States

The rising costs of cancer care and subsequent medical financial hardship for cancer survivors and families are well documented in the United States. Less attention has been paid to employment disruptions and loss of household income after a cancer diagnosis and during treatment, potentially resulting in lasting financial hardship, particularly for working-age adults not yet age-eligible for Medicare coverage and their families. In this article, the authors use a composite patient case to illustrate the adverse consequences of cancer diagnosis and treatment for employment, health insurance coverage, household income, and other aspects of financial hardship. They summarize existing research and provide nationally representative estimates of multiple aspects of financial hardship and health insurance coverage, benefit design, and employee benefits, such as paid sick leave, among working-age adults with a history of cancer and compare them with estimates among working-age adults without a history of cancer from the most recently available years of the National Health Interview Survey (2019-2021). Then, the authors identify opportunities for addressing employment and health insurance coverage challenges at multiple levels, including federal, state, and local policies; employers; cancer care delivery organizations; and nonprofit organizations. These efforts, when informed by research to identify best practices, can potentially help mitigate the financial hardship associated with cancer.

Effect of Medicaid expansion on cancer treatment and survival among Medicaid beneficiaries and the uninsured

BACKGROUND

The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid coverage for people with low income in the United States. Expanded insurance coverage could promote more timely access to cancer treatment, which could improve overall survival (OS), yet the long-term effects of Medicaid expansion (ME) remain unknown. We evaluated whether ME was associated with improved timely treatment initiation (TTI) and 3-year OS among patients with breast, cervical, colon, and lung cancers who were affected by the policy.

METHODS

Medicaid-insured or uninsured patients aged 40-64 with stage I-III breast, cervical, colon, or non-small cell lung cancer within the National Cancer Database (NCDB). A difference-in-differences (DID) approach was used to compare changes in TTI (within 60 days) and 3-year OS between patients in ME states versus nonexpansion (NE) states before (2010-2013) and after (2015-2018) ME. Adjusted DID estimates for TTI and 3-year OS were calculated using multivariable linear regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models, respectively.

RESULTS

ME was associated with a relative increase in TTI within 60 days for breast (DID = 4.6; p < 0.001), cervical (DID = 5.0 p = 0.013), and colon (DID = 4.0, p = 0.008), but not lung cancer (p = 0.505). In Cox regression analysis, ME was associated with improved 3-year OS for breast (DID hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82, p = 0.009), cervical (DID-HR = 0.81, p = 0.048), and lung (DID-HR = 0.87, p = 0.003). Changes in 3-year OS for colon cancer were not statistically different between ME and NE states (DID-HR, 0.77; p = 0.075).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that expanded insurance coverage can improve treatment and survival outcomes among low income and uninsured patients with cancer. As the debate surrounding ME continues nationwide, our findings serve as valuable insights to inform the development of policies aimed at fostering accessible and affordable healthcare for all.

The impact of individual-level income predicted from the BRFSS on the association between insurance status and overall survival among adults with cancer from the SEER program

INTRODUCTION

Among patients with cancer in the United States, Medicaid insurance is associated with worse outcomes than private insurance and with similar outcomes as being uninsured. However, prior studies have not addressed the impact of individual-level socioeconomic status, which determines Medicaid eligibility, on the associations of Medicaid status and cancer outcomes. Our objective was to determine whether differences in cancer outcomes by insurance status persist after accounting for individual-level income.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried for 18-64 year-old individuals with cancer from 2014-2016. Individual-level income was imputed using a model trained on Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance Survey participants including covariates also present in SEER. The association of 1-year overall survival and insurance status was estimated with and without adjustment for estimated individual-level income and other covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 416,784 cases in SEER were analyzed. The 1-yr OS for patients with private insurance, Medicaid insurance, and no insurance was 88.7%, 76.1%, and 73.7%, respectively. After adjusting for all covariates except individual-level income, 1-year OS differences were worse with Medicaid (-6.0%, 95% CI = -6.3 to -5.6) and no insurance (-6.7%, 95% CI = -7.3 to -6.0) versus private insurance. After also adjusting for estimated individual-level income, the survival difference for Medicaid patients was similar to privately insured (-0.4%, 95% CI = -1.9 to 1.1) and better than uninsured individuals (2.1%, 95% CI = 0.7 to 3.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Income, rather than Medicaid status, may drive poor cancer outcomes in the low-income and Medicaid-insured population. Medicaid insurance coverage may improve cancer outcomes for low-income individuals.

American Cancer Society's report on the status of cancer disparities in the United States, 2023

In 2021, the American Cancer Society published its first biennial report on the status of cancer disparities in the United States. In this second report, the authors provide updated data on racial, ethnic, socioeconomic (educational attainment as a marker), and geographic (metropolitan status) disparities in cancer occurrence and outcomes and contributing factors to these disparities in the country. The authors also review programs that have reduced cancer disparities and provide policy recommendations to further mitigate these inequalities. There are substantial variations in risk factors, stage at diagnosis, receipt of care, survival, and mortality for many cancers by race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and metropolitan status. During 2016 through 2020, Black and American Indian/Alaska Native people continued to bear a disproportionately higher burden of cancer deaths, both overall and from major cancers. By educational attainment, overall cancer mortality rates were about 1.6-2.8 times higher in individuals with ≤12 years of education than in those with ≥16 years of education among Black and White men and women. These disparities by educational attainment within each race were considerably larger than the Black-White disparities in overall cancer mortality within each educational attainment, ranging from 1.03 to 1.5 times higher among Black people, suggesting a major role for socioeconomic status disparities in racial disparities in cancer mortality given the disproportionally larger representation of Black people in lower socioeconomic status groups. Of note, the largest Black-White disparities in overall cancer mortality were among those who had ≥16 years of education. By area of residence, mortality from all cancer and from leading causes of cancer death were substantially higher in nonmetropolitan areas than in large metropolitan areas. For colorectal cancer, for example, mortality rates in nonmetropolitan areas versus large metropolitan areas were 23% higher among males and 21% higher among females. By age group, the racial and geographic disparities in cancer mortality were greater among individuals younger than 65 years than among those aged 65 years and older. Many of the observed racial, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in cancer mortality align with disparities in exposure to risk factors and access to cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment, which are largely rooted in fundamental inequities in social determinants of health. Equitable policies at all levels of government, broad interdisciplinary engagement to address these inequities, and equitable implementation of evidence-based interventions, such as increasing health insurance coverage, are needed to reduce cancer disparities.

Impact of Medicaid expansion on the multimodal treatment of biliary tract cancer

INTRODUCTION

The impact of Medicaid expansion (ME) on the treatment of patients with cancer remains controversial, especially individuals requiring complex multidisciplinary care. We sought to evaluate the impact of Medicaid expansion (ME) on receipt of multimodal care, including surgical resection, for Stage I-III biliary tract cancer (BTC).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with BTC between 40 and 65 years of age were identified from the National Cancer Database and divided into pre- (2008-2012) and post- (2015-2018) ME cohorts. Difference-in-difference (DID) analysis was used to determine the impact of ME on the utilization of surgery and multimodal chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy treatment for BTC.

RESULTS

Among 12,415 patients with BTC (extrahepatic, n = 5622, 45.3%; intrahepatic, n = 4352, 35.1%; gallbladder, n = 1944, 15.7%; overlapping, n = 497, 4.0%), 5835 (47.0%) and 6580 (53.0%) patients were diagnosed before versus after ME, respectively. Overall utilization of surgery (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.26) and multimodality therapy (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.27) increased in states that adopted ME. Utilization of surgery among uninsured/Medicaid patients in ME states increased relative to patients living in non-ME states (∆+10.1%, p = 0.01). Similarly, the use of multimodal treatment increased among uninsured/Medicaid patients living in ME versus non-ME states (∆+6.4%, p = 0.04); in contrast, there were no difference among patients with other insurance statuses (overall: ∆+1.5%, private: ∆-2.0%, other: ∆+3.9%, all p > 0.5). Uninsured/Medicaid patients with BTC who lived in a ME state had a lower risk of long-term death in the post-ME era (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.98; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of ME positively impacted survival among patients who underwent surgical and multimodal treatment for Stage I-III BTC.

Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act and Early Mortality Following Lung Cancer Surgery

Importance

Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is associated with gains in health insurance coverage, earlier stage diagnosis, and improved survival among patients with cancer.

Objective

To examine the association of Medicaid expansion with changes in early mortality among adults undergoing surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a setting in which access to care is a major determinant of survival.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used the National Cancer Database to identify 14 984 adults 45 to 64 years of age who underwent surgical resection of NSCLC between 2008 and 2019. Analysis was conducted between March 28, 2021, and September 1, 2023.

Exposure

State of residence Medicaid expansion status.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Descriptive statistics were used to compare study population characteristics by Medicaid expansion status of patients' state of residence. Difference-in-differences analyses were used to evaluate the association between Medicaid expansion and postoperative mortality before implementation of the ACA (2008-2013) vs after (2014-2019).

Results

Among 14 984 adults included, the mean (SD) age was 56.3 (5.1) years, 54.6% were women, and 62.1% lived in Medicaid expansion states. Both 30-day (from 0.97% to 0.26%) and 90-day (from 2.63% to 1.32%) postoperative mortality decreased from before the ACA to after among patients residing in Medicaid expansion states (both P < .001) but not in nonexpansion states (30-day mortality before the ACA, 0.75% vs after the ACA, 0.68%; P = .74; and 90-day mortality before the ACA, 2.43% vs after the ACA, 2.20%; P = .57), leading to a difference-in-differences of -0.64 percentage points (95% CI, -1.19 to -0.08; P = .03) for 30-day mortality and -1.08 percentage points (95% CI, -2.08 to -0.08; P = .03) for 90-day mortality. The difference-in-differences for in-hospital mortality was not significant (P = .34) between expansion states (1.41% before the ACA to 0.77% after the ACA; 0.63 percentage point decrease; P = .004) and nonexpansion states (1.49% before the ACA to 1.20% after the ACA; 0.30 percentage point decrease; P = .29).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of patients with NSCLC, Medicaid expansion was associated with declines in 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality following hospital discharge. These findings suggest that Medicaid expansion may be an effective strategy for improving access to care and cancer outcomes in this population.

Health insurance coverage among incident cancer cases from population-based cancer registries in 49 US states, 2010-2019

Having health insurance coverage is a strong determinant of cancer care access and survival in the United States. The expansion of Medicaid income eligibility under the Affordable Care Act has increased insurance coverage for working-age adults. Using data from the Cancer Incidence in North America (CiNA) in 2010-2019, we identified 6 432 117 incident cancer cases with known insurance status diagnosed at age 18-64 years from population-based registries of 49 states. Considerable variation in Medicaid coverage and uninsured rate exists across states, especially by Medicaid expansion status. Among expansion states, Medicaid coverage increased from 14.1% in 2010 to 19.9% in 2019, while the Medicaid coverage rate remained lower (range = 11.7% - 12.7%) in non-expansion states. The uninsured rate decreased from 4.9% to 2.1% in expansion states, while in non-expansion states, the uninsured rate decreased slightly from 9.5% to 8.1%. In 2019, 111 393 cancer cases (16.9%) had Medicaid coverage at diagnosis (range = 7.6%-37.9% across states), and 48 357 (4.4%) were uninsured (range = 0.5%-13.2%). These estimates suggest that many patients with cancer may face challenges with care access and continuity, especially following the unwinding of COVID-19 pandemic protections for Medicaid coverage. State cancer prevention and control efforts are needed to mitigate cancer care disparities among vulnerable populations.

Pancreatic Cancer Health Disparity: Pharmacologic Anthropology

Pancreatic cancer (PCa) remains a formidable global health challenge, with high mortality rates and limited treatment options. While advancements in pharmacology have led to improved outcomes for various cancers, PCa continues to exhibit significant health disparities, disproportionately affecting certain populations. This paper explores the intersection of pharmacology and anthropology in understanding the health disparities associated with PCa. By considering the socio-cultural, economic, and behavioral factors that influence the development, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of PCa, pharmacologic anthropology provides a comprehensive framework to address these disparities and improve patient care.

State Public Assistance Spending and Survival Among Adults With Cancer

Importance

Social determinants of health contribute to disparities in cancer outcomes. State public assistance spending, including Medicaid and cash assistance programs for socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals, may improve access to care; address barriers, such as food and housing insecurity; and lead to improved cancer outcomes for marginalized populations.

Objective

To determine whether state-level public assistance spending is associated with overall survival (OS) among individuals with cancer, overall and by race and ethnicity.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included US adults aged at least 18 years with a new cancer diagnosis from 2007 to 2013, with follow-up through 2019. Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Data were analyzed from November 18, 2021, to July 6, 2023.

Exposure

Differential state-level public assistance spending.

Main Outcome and Measure

The main outcome was 6-year OS. Analyses were adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, sex, metropolitan residence, county-level income, state fixed effects, state-level percentages of residents living in poverty and aged 65 years or older, cancer type, and cancer stage.

Results

A total 2 035 977 individuals with cancer were identified and included in analysis, with 1 005 702 individuals (49.4%) aged 65 years or older and 1 026 309 (50.4%) male. By tertile of public assistance spending, 6-year OS was 55.9% for the lowest tertile, 55.9% for the middle tertile, and 56.6% for the highest tertile. In adjusted analyses, public assistance spending at the state-level was significantly associated with higher 6-year OS (0.09% [95% CI, 0.04%-0.13%] per $100 per capita; P < .001), particularly for non-Hispanic Black individuals (0.29% [95% CI, 0.07%-0.52%] per $100 per capita; P = .01) and non-Hispanic White individuals (0.12% [95% CI, 0.08%-0.16%] per $100 per capita; P < .001). In sensitivity analyses examining the roles of Medicaid spending and Medicaid expansion including additional years of data, non-Medicaid spending was associated with higher 3-year OS among non-Hispanic Black individuals (0.49% [95% CI, 0.26%-0.72%] per $100 per capita when accounting for Medicaid spending; 0.17% [95% CI, 0.02%-0.31%] per $100 per capita Medicaid expansion effects).

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study found that state public assistance expenditures, including cash assistance programs and Medicaid, were associated with improved survival for individuals with cancer. State investment in public assistance programs may represent an important avenue to improve cancer outcomes through addressing social determinants of health and should be a topic of further investigation.

Medicaid expansion is associated with treatment receipt, timeliness, and outcomes among young adults with breast cancer

Female breast cancer is a common cancer in young adults, an age group with the highest uninsured rate. Among 51 675 young adult women (ages 18-39 years) diagnosed with breast cancer between 2011 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database, we estimated changes in guideline-concordant treatment receipt, treatment timeliness, and survival associated with the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion. Of young adults with stage I-III estrogen receptor-positive or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer, Medicaid expansion was associated with a net increase of 2.42 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.56 to 4.28 percentage points) in the percentage receiving endocrine therapy. Among all young adults with stage I-III breast cancer, Medicaid expansion was associated with a net reduction of 1.65 percentage points (95% CI = 0.08 to 3.22 percentage points) in treatment delays defined as treatment initiation of at least 60 days after diagnosis and a net increase of 1.00 percentage points (95% CI = 0.21 to 1.79 percentage points) in 2-year overall survival. Our study provides evidence of benefit in cancer care and outcomes from Medicaid expansion among the young adult population.

Progress in reducing cancer mortality in the United States by congressional district, 1996-2003 to 2012-2020

BACKGROUND

United States cancer death rates have been steadily declining since the early 1990s, but information on disparities in progress against cancer mortality across congressional districts is lacking. This study examined trends in cancer death rates, overall and for lung, colorectal, female breast, and prostate cancer by congressional district.

METHODS

County level cancer death counts and population data from the National Center for Health Statistics were used to estimate relative change in age-standardized cancer death rates from 1996-2003 to 2012-2020 by sex and congressional district.

RESULTS

From 1996-2003 to 2012-2020, overall cancer death rates declined in every congressional district, with most congressional districts showing a 20%-45% decline among males and a 10%-40% decline among females. In general, the smallest percent of relative declines were found in the Midwest and Appalachia, whereas the largest declines were found in the South along the East Coast and the southern border. As a result, the highest cancer death rates generally shifted from congressional districts across the South in 1996-2003 to districts in the Midwest and central divisions of the South (including Appalachia) in 2012-2020. Death rates for lung, colorectal, female breast, and prostate cancers also declined in almost all congressional districts, although with some variation in relative changes and geographical patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Progress in reducing cancer death rates during the past 25 years considerably vary by congressional district, underscoring the need for strengthening existing and implementing new public health policies for broad and equitable application of proven interventions such as raising tax on tobacco and Medicaid expansion.

Changes in cancer mortality after Medicaid expansion and the role of stage at diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Medicaid expansion is associated with improved survival following cancer diagnosis. However, little research has assessed how changes in cancer stage may mediate improved cancer mortality or how expansion may have decreased population-level cancer mortality rates.

METHODS

Nationwide state-level cancer data from 2001 to 2019 for individuals ages 20-64 years were obtained from the combined Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results National Program of Cancer Registries (incidence) and the National Center for Health Statistics (mortality) databases. We estimated changes in distant stage cancer incidence and cancer mortality rates from pre- to post-2014 in expansion vs nonexpansion states using generalized estimating equations with robust standard errors. Mediation analyses were used to assess whether distant stage cancer incidence mediated changes in cancer mortality.

RESULTS

There were 17 370 state-level observations. For all cancers combined, there were Medicaid expansion-associated decreases in distant stage cancer incidence (adjusted odds ratio = 0.967, 95% confidence interval  = 0.943 to 0.992; P = .01) and cancer mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 0.965, 95% confidence interval = 0.936 to 0.995; P = .022). This translates to 2591 averted distant stage cancer diagnoses and 1616 averted cancer deaths in the Medicaid expansion states. Distant stage cancer incidence mediated 58.4% of expansion-associated changes in cancer mortality overall (P = .008). By cancer site subgroups, there were expansion-associated decreases in breast, cervix, and liver cancer mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid expansion was associated with decreased distant stage cancer incidence and cancer mortality. Approximately 60% of the expansion-associated changes in cancer mortality overall were mediated by distant stage diagnoses.

The Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Patients with Cancer in the United States: A Review

Since 2014, American states have had the option to expand their Medicaid programs as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which was signed into law by former President Barack H. Obama in 2010. Emerging research has found that Medicaid expansion has had a significant impact on patients with cancer, who often face significant financial barriers to receiving the care they need. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive examination of the research conducted thus far on the impact of Medicaid expansion on patients with cancer. We begin with a discussion of the history of Medicaid expansion and the key features of the ACA that facilitated it. We then review the literature, analyzing studies that have investigated the impact of Medicaid expansion on cancer patients in terms of access to care, quality of care, and health outcomes. Our findings suggest that Medicaid expansion has had a positive impact on patients with cancer in a number of ways. Patients in expansion states are more likely to receive timely cancer screening and diagnoses, and are more likely to receive appropriate cancer-directed treatment. Additionally, Medicaid expansion has been associated with improvements in cancer-related health outcomes, including improved survival rates. However, limitations and gaps in the current research on the impact of Medicaid expansion on patients with cancer exist, including a lack of long-term data on health outcomes. Additionally, further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms through which Medicaid expansion impacts cancer care.

Medicaid Expansion Associated With Increase In Palliative Care For People With Advanced-Stage Cancers

Clinical guidelines have endorsed early palliative care for patients with advanced malignancies, but receipt remains low in the US. This study examined the association between Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act and receipt of palliative care among patients newly diagnosed with advanced-stage cancers. Using the National Cancer Database, we found that the percentage of eligible patients who received palliative care as part of first-course treatment increased from 17.0 percent preexpansion to 18.9 percent postexpansion in Medicaid expansion states and from 15.7 percent to 16.7 percent, respectively, in nonexpansion states, resulting in a net increase of 1.3 percentage points in expansion states in adjusted analyses. Increases in receipt of palliative care associated with Medicaid expansion were largest for patients with advanced pancreatic, colorectal, lung, and oral cavity and pharynx cancers and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Our findings suggest that increasing Medicaid coverage facilitates access to guideline-based palliative care for advanced cancer, and they provide additional evidence of benefit in cancer care from states' expansion of income eligibility for Medicaid.

The association of Medicaid expansion and pediatric cancer overall survival

Medicaid eligibility expansion, though not directly applicable to children, has been associated with improved access to care in children with cancer, but associations with overall survival are unknown. Data for children ages 0 to 14 years diagnosed with cancer from 2011 to 2018 were queried from central cancer registries data covering cancer diagnoses from 40 states as part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries. Difference-in-differences analyses were used to compare changes in 2-year survival from 2011-2013 to 2015-2018 in Medicaid expansion relative to nonexpansion states. In adjusted analyses, there was a 1.50 percentage point (95% confidence interval = 0.37 to 2.64) increase in 2-year overall survival after 2014 in expansion relative to nonexpansion states, particularly for those living in the lowest county income quartile (difference-in-differences  = 5.12 percentage point, 95% confidence interval = 2.59 to 7.65). Medicaid expansion may improve cancer outcomes for children with cancer.

Medicaid expansion, chemotherapy delays, and racial disparities among women with early-stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act extends eligibility for participating states and has been associated with improved outcomes by facilitating access to care. Delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with worse outcomes among patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC). The impact of Medicaid expansion in narrowing delays by race and ethnicity has not been studied, to our knowledge.

METHODS

This was a population-based study using the National Cancer Database. Patients diagnosed with primary early-stage BC between 2007 and 2017 residing in states that underwent Medicaid expansion in January 2014 were included. Time to chemotherapy initiation and proportion of patients experiencing chemotherapy delays (>60 days) were evaluated using difference-in-difference and Cox proportional hazards models in preexpansion and postexpansion periods according to race and ethnicity.

RESULTS

A total 100 643 patients were included (63 313 preexpansion and 37 330 postexpansion). After Medicaid expansion, the proportion of patients experiencing chemotherapy initiation delay decreased from 23.4% to 19.4%. The absolute decrease was 3.2, 5.3, 6.4, and 4.8 percentage points (ppt) for Black, Hispanic, White, and Other patients. Compared with White patients, statistically significant adjusted difference-in-differences were observed for Black (-2.1 ppt, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -3.7% to -0.5%) and Hispanic patients (-3.2 ppt, 95% CI = -5.6% to -0.9%). Statistically significant reductions in time to chemotherapy between expansion periods were observed among White patients (adjusted hazard ratio = .11, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.12) and those belonging to racialized groups (adjusted hazard ratio  = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with early-stage BC, Medicaid expansion was associated with a reduction in racial disparities by decreasing the gap in the proportion of Black and Hispanic patients experiencing delays in adjuvant chemotherapy initiation.

Insurance Coverage and Forgoing Medical Appointments Because of Cost Among Cancer Survivors After 2016

PURPOSE

The uninsured rate began rising after 2016, which some have attributed to health policies undermining aspects of the Affordable Care Act. Our primary objectives were to assess the changes in insurance coverage and forgoing medical care because of cost in cancer survivors from pre-enactment (2016) through postenactment of those policies (2019) and determine whether there were subgroups that were disproportionately affected.

METHODS

The 2016-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys were queried for 18- to 64-year-old cancer survivors. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to assess temporal changes in (1) insurance coverage and (2) forgoing medical appointments because of cost in the preceding 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 62,669 cancer survivors were identified. The percentage of insured cancer survivors decreased from 92.4% in 2016 to 90.4% in 2019 (odds ratio for change in insurance coverage or affordability per one-year increase [ORyear], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.98; P = .01), translating to 161,000 fewer cancer survivors in the United States with insurance coverage. There were decreases in employer-sponsored insurance coverage (ORyear, 0.89) but increases in Medicaid coverage (ORyear, 1.17) from 2016 to 2019. Forgoing medical appointments because of cost increased from 17.9% in 2016 to 20.0% in 2019 (ORyear, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.1; P = .025), affecting an estimated 169,000 cancer survivors. The greatest changes were observed among individuals with low income, particularly those residing in nonexpansion states.

CONCLUSION

Between 2016 and 2019, there were 161,000 fewer cancer survivors in the United States with insurance coverage, and 169,000 forwent medical care because of cost.

Survival in Young Adults With Cancer Is Associated With Medicaid Expansion Through the Affordable Care Act

PURPOSE

Medicaid expansion through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been shown to improve insurance coverage and early diagnosis of cancer in young adults (YAs); whether these improvements translate to survival benefits remains unknown. We examined the association between Medicaid expansion under the ACA and 2-year overall survival among YAs with cancer.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 345,413 YAs (age 18-39 years) diagnosed with cancer in 2010-2017. We applied the difference-in-differences (DD) method to estimate changes in 2-year overall survival after versus before Medicaid expansion in expansion versus nonexpansion states.

RESULTS

Among all YAs, 2-year overall survival increased more in expansion states (90.39% pre-expansion to 91.85% postexpansion) than in nonexpansion states (88.98% pre-expansion to 90.07% postexpansion), resulting in a net increase of 0.55 percentage points (ppt; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.96). The expansion-associated survival benefit was concentrated in patients with female breast cancer (DD, 1.20 ppt; 95%CI, 0.27 to 2.12) when stratifying by cancer type and in patients with stage IV disease (DD, 2.56; 95%CI, 0.36 to 4.77) when stratifying by stage. In addition, greater survival benefit associated with Medicaid expansion was observed among racial and ethnic minoritized groups (DD, 1.01 ppt; 95% CI, 0.14 to 1.87) as compared with non-Hispanic White peers (DD, 0.41 ppt; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.87) and among patients with a Charlson comorbidity score of ≥ 2 (DD, 6.48 ppt; 95% CI, 0.81 to 12.16) than those with a comorbidity score of 0 (DD, 0.44 ppt; 95% CI, 0.005 to 0.87).

CONCLUSION

Medicaid expansion under the ACA was associated with an improvement in overall survival among YAs with cancer, with survival benefits most pronounced among patients of under-represented race and ethnicity and patients with high-risk diseases.

Changes in Cancer Mortality by Race and Ethnicity Following the Implementation of the Affordable Care Act in California

Although Affordable Care Act (ACA) implementation has improved cancer outcomes, less is known about how much the improvement applies to different racial and ethnic populations. We examined changes in health insurance coverage and cancer-specific mortality rates by race/ethnicity pre- and post-ACA. We identified newly diagnosed breast (n = 117,738), colorectal (n = 38,334), and cervical cancer (n = 11,109) patients < 65 years in California 2007-2017. Hazard rate ratios (HRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using multivariable Cox regression to estimate risk of cancer-specific death pre- (2007-2010) and post-ACA (2014-2017) and by race/ethnicity [American Indian/Alaska Natives (AIAN); Asian American; Hispanic; Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (NHPI); non-Hispanic Black (NHB); non-Hispanic white (NHW)]. Cancer-specific mortality from colorectal cancer was lower post-ACA among Hispanic (HRR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.74 to 0.92), NHB (HRR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.82), and NHW (HRR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.97) but not Asian American (HRR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.82 to 1.10) patients. We observed a lower risk of death from cervical cancer post-ACA among NHB women (HRR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.99). No statistically significant differences in breast cancer-specific mortality were observed for any racial or ethnic group. Cancer-specific mortality decreased following ACA implementation for colorectal and cervical cancers for some racial and ethnic groups in California, suggesting Medicaid expansion is associated with reductions in health inequity.