1
|
Poon DMC, Yuan J, Wong OL, Yang B, Tse MY, Fung YY, Chiu ST, Lin WC, Cheung KY, Chiu G, Yu SK. Post-Prostatectomy Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy on a 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Integrated Linear Accelerator: Feasibility, Toxicity, and Preliminary Clinical Outcomes. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2025; 21:247-255. [PMID: 39632357 PMCID: PMC12033039 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 09/10/2024] [Accepted: 11/23/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to prospectively investigate magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) for post-prostatectomy prostate cancer and report preliminary clinical outcomes. METHODS All included patients underwent salvage or adjuvant adaptive MRgRT on a 1.5T MR integrated linear accelerator (MR-LINAC). Gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were assessed. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate estimated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis. A progression event was defined as the first occurrence of biochemical failure, radiological progression, or death. Secondary endpoints were biochemical failure-free survival (bFFS) rate, radiological PFS (rPFS) rate, and ≥G2 adverse events. RESULTS Thirty post-prostatectomy patients were enrolled and followed (median follow-up: 32.0 months; 3.0-48.1 months). Three patients had biochemical failure during follow-up. One patient developed pelvic node metastases. All patients were alive. The estimated PFS rates were 96.4% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 89.8%-100.0%) at 2 years and 78.8% (95%CI: 61.3%-100%) at 3 years. The estimated bFFS rates were 96.4% (95%CI: 89.8%-100%) /86.6%(95%CI: 73.4%-100%) at 2/3 years, respectively. The corresponding rPFS rates were 100% at 2 years and 92.3% (95%CI: 78.9%-100%) at 3 years, respectively. There was only one acute G2 GI adverse event (1/30, 3.33%) of abdominal pain occurred. Two late G2 events (one rectal bleeding and one urinary frequency) were scored (2/30, 6.67%). No ≥G3 events were observed. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest the feasibility, excellent patient tolerance, and encouraging efficacy of post-prostatectomy MRgRT, extending our knowledge of the clinical outcomes of MRgRT and serving as a benchmark for future investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren M. C. Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology CenterHong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Jing Yuan
- Research DepartmentHong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Oi Lei Wong
- Research DepartmentHong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Bin Yang
- Medical Physics DepartmentHong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Mei Yan Tse
- Medical Physics DepartmentHong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Yan Yee Fung
- Research DepartmentHong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Sin Ting Chiu
- Department of RadiotherapyHong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Wai Chi Lin
- Research DepartmentHong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Kin Yin Cheung
- Medical Physics DepartmentHong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| | - George Chiu
- Department of RadiotherapyHong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Siu Ki Yu
- Medical Physics DepartmentHong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zaurito P, Stabile A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Gandaglia G. The prognostic role of prostate MRI in prostate cancer patients. Curr Opin Urol 2025:00042307-990000000-00241. [PMID: 40269557 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has been included in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the role of this imaging modality in predicting clinical outcomes after diagnosis has been poorly addressed so far. This review aims to summarize the most relevant updates on the prognostic role of mpMRI. RECENT FINDINGS Baseline mpMRI features help to predict adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy (RP) and grade reclassification during active surveillance. Parameters derived at prostate mpMRI such as PI-RADS score 4-5, the maximum diameter of the index lesion and the presence of extracapsular invasion/seminal vesicle invasion are among the strongest predictors of biochemical recurrence (BCR) for men treated with RP. mpMRI-based predictive models can achieve similar accuracy for BCR prediction when compared with validated models that relied on final pathology. Moreover, the use of mpMRI findings to predict disease recurrence after radiotherapy or focal therapy seems to optimize patient's risk stratification after treatment, ruling out disease recurrence. SUMMARY Clinicians should account for prostate mpMRI findings when predicting clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Zaurito
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang R, Wang S, Mi Y, Huang T, Wang J, Ni J, Wang J, Yin J, Li M, Ran X, Fan S, Sun Q, Tan SY, Phillip Koeffler H, Ding L, Chen YQ, Feng N. Elevated serum levels of GPX4, NDUFS4, PRDX5, and TXNRD2 as predictive biomarkers for castration resistance in prostate cancer patients: an exploratory study. Br J Cancer 2025; 132:543-557. [PMID: 39900986 PMCID: PMC11920399 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-025-02947-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2024] [Revised: 12/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2025] [Indexed: 02/05/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogeneous disease affecting over 14% of the male population worldwide. Although patients often respond positively to initial treatments within the first 2-3 years, many eventually develop a more lethal form of the disease known as castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). At present, no biomarkers that predict the onset of CRPC are available. This study aims to provide insights into the diagnosis and prediction of CRPC emergence. METHODS Protein expression dynamics were analysed in drug (androgen receptor inhibitor)-tolerant persister (DTP) and drug withdrawal cells using proteomics to identify potential biomarkers. These biomarkers were subsequently validated using a mouse model, 180-paired carcinoma/benign tissues, and 482 serum samples. Five machine learning algorithms were employed to build clinical prediction models, wherein the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) framework was used to interpret the best-performing model. Moreover, three regression models were developed to determine the Time from initial PCa diagnosis to CRPC development (TPC) in patients. RESULTS We identified that the protein expression levels of GPX4, NDUFS4, PRDX5, and TXNRD2 were significantly upregulated in PCa patients, particularly in those with CRPC. Among the tested machine learning models, the random forest and extreme gradient boosting models performed best on tissue and serum cohorts, achieving AUCs of 0.958 and 0.988, respectively. In addition, a significant inverse correlation was observed between TPC and serum levels of these four biomarkers. This correlation was formulated in three regression models, which achieved the smallest mean absolute error of 1.903 on independent datasets for predicting CRPC emergence. CONCLUSION Our study provides new insights into the role of DTP cells in CRPC development. The quad protein panel identified in our study, along with the post hoc and intrinsically explainable prediction models, may serve as a convenient and real-time prognostic tool, addressing the current lack of clinical biomarkers for CRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Wang
- Jiangnan University Medical Center, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
- Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
| | - Shaopeng Wang
- Jiangnan University Medical Center, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
| | - Yuanyuan Mi
- Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
| | - Tianyi Huang
- School of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jun Wang
- Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
| | - Jiang Ni
- Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
| | - Jian Yin
- Key Laboratory of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, School of Biotechnology & School of Life Sciences and Health Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
| | - Menglu Li
- Jiangnan University Medical Center, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
- Department of Urology, Wuxi No.2 People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China
| | - Xuebin Ran
- Department of Pathology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shuangyi Fan
- Department of Pathology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Qiaoyang Sun
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Soo Yong Tan
- Department of Pathology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - H Phillip Koeffler
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, UCLA School of Medicine, California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lingwen Ding
- Department of Pathology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Yong Q Chen
- Jiangnan University Medical Center, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
- Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
| | - Ninghan Feng
- Jiangnan University Medical Center, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
- Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
- Department of Urology, Wuxi No.2 People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mukai Y, Omura M, Minagawa Y, Mase M, Nishikawa Y, Miura I, Hata M. Long-term Outcomes of Salvage Radiotherapy Using TomoTherapy With Image-guided Radiotherapy for Postoperative Prostate Cancer Patients. CANCER DIAGNOSIS & PROGNOSIS 2025; 5:189-197. [PMID: 40034950 PMCID: PMC11871854 DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2025] [Revised: 02/01/2025] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025]
Abstract
Background/Aim This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes, treatment-related toxicity, and factors affecting postoperative prostate cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy and image-guided radiation therapy (IMRT-IGRT) using TomoTherapy as salvage radiotherapy (SRT). Patients and Methods A total of 71 consecutive patients who underwent SRT after radical prostatectomy between 2011 and 2023 were included in the study. Treatment outcomes, including the progression-free rate (PFR) and overall survival, were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Associations between treatment outcomes and factors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results The median follow-up time after SRT was 60 months (range=1-148 months). The 5-year and 10-year PFR were 69.05% and 54.73%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, maximum PSA >0.7 ng/ml was significantly associated with worse PFR (p<0.05). Additionally, eight patients (11.3%) experienced late grade 2 genitourinary toxicity, and one (1.4%) patient developed late grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity. No adverse events were rated higher than grade 3. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate a comparable PFR at 5-year (69.05%) and 10-year (54.73%) intervals with those of previous reports, confirming the efficacy of IMRT-IGRT as a viable option for SRT. Worse PFR was associated with factors such as mass PSA >0.7 ng/ml, providing critical insights into prognostication. SRT for prostate cancer with IMRT and IGRT using TomoTherapy showed similar treatment outcomes and low toxicity rates compared with those of previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Mukai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shona Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Motoko Omura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shona Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Yumiko Minagawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shona Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Misato Mase
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yuta Nishikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Ichiro Miura
- Department of Urology, Shona Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Masaharu Hata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tao H, Wu F, Li R, Du X, Zhu Y, Dong L, Pan J, Dong B, Xue W. Efficacy and Predictive Factors Analysis of Androgen Deprivation Plus Novel Hormone Therapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment for High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Prostate 2025; 85:198-206. [PMID: 39488849 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Revised: 09/24/2024] [Accepted: 10/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This investigation explored the clinical features, pathological outcomes, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) duration among high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) patients who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in combination with radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Additionally, we identified prognostic indicators that discern pathological complete response (pCR) or minimal residual disease (MRD) and BCR. METHODS In total, we examined 76 HRPC patients, who received NAT with either androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus apalutamide or ADT plus abiraterone, with subsequent RP and PLND. We conducted a genetic evaluation of patients receiving neoadjuvant apalutamide. Additionally, patient pathological outcomes, circulating prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rates, and BCR duration were analyzed. Lastly, we employed uni- and multivariate analyses to screen for prognostic factors that govern pCR or MRD and BCR duration. RESULTS Patient median age and median PSA at presentation were 69 years (IQR: 66-73), and 47.6 ng/mL (IQR: 24.1-105.75), respectively. We observed marked changes in pCR or MRD rates between the two cohorts. In particular, the ADT plus apalutamide cohort (51.5%) exhibited enhanced rates relative to the ADT plus abiraterone cohort (25.6%) (p = 0.03). The median BCR duration was substantially prolonged among neoadjuvant apalutamide cohort relative to the neoadjuvant abiraterone cohort (261 days vs. 76 days, p = 0.04). Using multivariate analysis, we revealed that the postintervention pre-RP PSA content (≤ 0.1 ng/mL vs. > 0.1 ng/mL) remained a substantial stand-alone indicator of pCR or MRD (odds ratio: 10.712, 95% CI: 2.725-42.105, p < 0.001). Furthermore, supplemental analyses revealed that the ADT plus apalutamide cohort exhibited an augmented serum response rate, which, in turn, reduced the post-intervention pre-RP PSA content. Based on our genetic profiling of the neoadjuvant apalutamide cohort demonstrated high-frequency deleterious changes in the AR axis (30.3%), followed by TP53 mutations (15.15%). Patients with defective AR axis experienced a remarkably shorter median BCR duration relative to patients with other or no genetic alterations (52.5 days vs. 286 and 336 days, respectively, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, using multivariate analysis, we demonstrated that achieving pCR or MRD (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.170, 95% CI: 0.061-0.477, p < 0.001) and presence of defective AR signaling (HR: 11.193, 95% CI: 3.499-35.806, p < 0.001) were strong stand-alone indicators of BCR. CONCLUSIONS Herein, we demonstrated the superior performance of ADT plus apalutamide in achieving pCR or MRD and in extending BCR duration among HRPC patients. Post-intervention pre-RP PSA content as well as genetic shifts, especially in the AR axis, are critical indicators of patient pathological and clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the significance of genetic testing and PSA content monitoring in treating HRPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanyang Tao
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Fan Wu
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Rui Li
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xinxing Du
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yinjie Zhu
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Liang Dong
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiahua Pan
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Baijun Dong
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Touma N, Larose M, Ouellet J, Bédard-Tremblay D, Singbo N, Hovington H, Neveu B, Archambault L, Pouliot F. External validation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center preoperative nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in a cohort of high-grade prostate cancer patients. Prostate 2024; 84:1093-1097. [PMID: 38800871 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Commonly used preoperative nomograms predicting clinical and pathological outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa) patients have not been yet validated in high-grade only PCa patients. Our objective is to perform an external validation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) preoperative nomogram as a predictor of lymph node invasion (LNI) in a cohort of high-grade PCa patients. METHODS We included patients with high-grade PCa (Gleason ≥8) treated at our institution between 2011 and 2020 with radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection without receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) was used to quantify the accuracy of the model to predict LNI. A calibration plot was used to evaluate the model's precision, and a decision curve analysis was computed to evaluate the net benefit associated with its use. This study was approved by our institution's ethics board. RESULTS A total of 242 patients with a median age of 66 (60-71) years were included. LNI was observed in 70 (29%) patients with a mean of 16 (median = 15; range = 2-42) resected nodes. The MSKCC nomogram discriminative accuracy, as evaluated by the AUC-ROC was 79.0% (CI: [0.727-0.853]). CONCLUSION The MSKCC preoperative nomogram is a good predictor of LNI and a useful tool associated with net clinical benefit in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nawar Touma
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Maxence Larose
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
- Department of Physics and Optical Engineering, Cancer Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Jade Ouellet
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | - Narcisse Singbo
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Hélène Hovington
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Bertrand Neveu
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Louis Archambault
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Frédéric Pouliot
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alessi S, Maggioni R, Luzzago S, Summers PE, Renne G, Zugni F, Belmonte M, Raimondi S, Vignati S, Mistretta FA, Di Meglio L, D'Ascoli E, Scarabelli A, Marvaso G, De Cobelli O, Musi G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Curigliano G, Petralia G. Association between mpMRI detected tumor apparent diffusion coefficient and 5-year biochemical recurrence risk after radical prostatectomy. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:1394-1404. [PMID: 39014292 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01857-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the ability of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to predict the risk of 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective analysis included 1207 peripheral and 232 non-peripheral zone prostate cancer (PCa) patients who underwent mpMRI before RP (2012-2015), with the outcome of interest being 5-year BCR. ADC was evaluated as a continuous variable and as categories: low (< 850 µm2/s), intermediate (850-1100 µm2/s), and high (> 1100 µm2/s). Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank testing of BCR-free survival, multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were formed to estimate the risk of BCR. RESULTS Among the 1439 males with median age 63 (± 7) years, the median follow-up was 59 months, and 306 (25%) patients experienced BCR. Peripheral zone PCa patients with BCR had lower tumor ADC values than those without BCR (874 versus 1025 µm2/s, p < 0.001). Five-year BCR-free survival rates were 52.3%, 74.4%, and 87% for patients in the low, intermediate, and high ADC value categories, respectively (p < 0.0001). Lower ADC was associated with BCR, both as continuously coded variable (HR: 5.35; p < 0.001) and as ADC categories (intermediate versus high ADC-HR: 1.56, p = 0.017; low vs. high ADC-HR; 2.36, p < 0.001). In the non-peripheral zone PCa patients, no association between ADC and BCR was observed. CONCLUSION Tumor ADC values and categories were found to be predictive of the 5-year BCR risk after RP in patients with peripheral zone PCa and may serve as a prognostic biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Alessi
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
| | - Roberta Maggioni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Paul E Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Renne
- Division of Uropathology and Intraoperative Diagnostic Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Zugni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Maddalena Belmonte
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Raimondi
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit Department of Experimental Oncology IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvano Vignati
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit Department of Experimental Oncology IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco A Mistretta
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Di Meglio
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa D'Ascoli
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Scarabelli
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sun R, A J, Yu H, Wang Y, He M, Tan L, Cheng H, Zhang J, Wang Y, Sun X, Lyu M, Qu M, Huang L, Li Z, Zhang W, Ma K, Dong Z, Ge W, Zhang Y, Ding X, Yang B, Hou J, Xu C, Wang L, Zhu Y, Guo T, Gao X, Yang C. Proteomic landscape profiling of primary prostate cancer reveals a 16-protein panel for prognosis prediction. Cell Rep Med 2024; 5:101679. [PMID: 39168102 PMCID: PMC11384950 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignant tumor in men. Currently, there are few prognosis indicators for predicting PCa outcomes and guiding treatments. Here, we perform comprehensive proteomic profiling of 918 tissue specimens from 306 Chinese patients with PCa using data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS). We identify over 10,000 proteins and define three molecular subtypes of PCa with significant clinical and proteomic differences. We develop a 16-protein panel that effectively predicts biochemical recurrence (BCR) for patients with PCa, which is validated in six published datasets and one additional 99-biopsy-sample cohort by targeted proteomics. Interestingly, this 16-protein panel effectively predicts BCR across different International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grades and pathological stages and outperforms the D'Amico risk classification system in BCR prediction. Furthermore, double knockout of NUDT5 and SEPTIN8, two components from the 16-protein panel, significantly suppresses the PCa cells to proliferate, invade, and migrate, suggesting the combination of NUDT5 and SEPTIN8 may provide new approaches for PCa treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Sun
- School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China; Westlake Center for Intelligent Proteomics, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310030, China; Research Center for Industries of the Future, Westlake University, 600 Dunyu Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China; Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jun A
- School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China; Westlake Center for Intelligent Proteomics, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310030, China; Research Center for Industries of the Future, Westlake University, 600 Dunyu Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China; Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Haolan Yu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumor, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China; Department of Pathology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Miaoxia He
- Department of Pathology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lingling Tan
- Westlake Omics (Hangzhou) Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310024, China
| | - Honghan Cheng
- School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China; Westlake Center for Intelligent Proteomics, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310030, China; Research Center for Industries of the Future, Westlake University, 600 Dunyu Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China; Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jili Zhang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yingrui Wang
- School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China; Westlake Center for Intelligent Proteomics, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310030, China; Research Center for Industries of the Future, Westlake University, 600 Dunyu Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China; Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiaochen Sun
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumor, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengge Lyu
- School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China; Westlake Center for Intelligent Proteomics, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310030, China; Research Center for Industries of the Future, Westlake University, 600 Dunyu Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China; Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Min Qu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lingling Huang
- School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China; Westlake Omics (Hangzhou) Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310024, China
| | - Zijian Li
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenhui Zhang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kunpeng Ma
- School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China; Westlake Center for Intelligent Proteomics, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310030, China; Research Center for Industries of the Future, Westlake University, 600 Dunyu Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China; Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhenyang Dong
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weigang Ge
- Westlake Omics (Hangzhou) Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310024, China
| | - Yun Zhang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xuan Ding
- Westlake Center for Intelligent Proteomics, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310030, China; Research Center for Industries of the Future, Westlake University, 600 Dunyu Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China; Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianguo Hou
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chuanliang Xu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Cell Engineering, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Cell Engineering, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Yi Zhu
- School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China; Westlake Center for Intelligent Proteomics, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310030, China; Research Center for Industries of the Future, Westlake University, 600 Dunyu Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China; Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Tiannan Guo
- School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China; Westlake Center for Intelligent Proteomics, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310030, China; Research Center for Industries of the Future, Westlake University, 600 Dunyu Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310030, China; Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Xu Gao
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Cell Engineering, Shanghai 200433, China.
| | - Chenghua Yang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Cell Engineering, Shanghai 200433, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Herlemann A, Cowan JE, Washington SL, Wong AC, Broering JM, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR. Long-term Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality After Prostatectomy, Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, Hormonal Therapy, or Monitoring for Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2024; 85:565-573. [PMID: 37858454 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To compare long-term survival among men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), brachytherapy (BT), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT), or monitoring (active surveillance [AS]/watchful waiting [WW]) for PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This is a cohort study with long-term follow-up from the multicenter, prospective, largely community-based Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) registry. Men with biopsy-proven, clinical T1-3aN0M0, localized PCa were consecutively accrued within 6 mo of diagnosis and had clinical risk data and at least 12 mo of follow-up after diagnosis available. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PCa risk was assessed, and multivariable analyses were performed to compare PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) and all-cause mortality by primary treatment, with extensive adjustment for age and case mix using the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score and a well-validated nomogram. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Among 11 864 men, 6227 (53%) underwent RP, 1645 (14%) received BT, 1462 (12%) received EBRT, 1510 (13%) received PADT, and 1020 (9%) were managed with AS/WW. At a median of 9.4 yr (interquartile range 5.8-13.7) after treatment, 764 men had died from PCa. After adjusting for CAPRA score, the hazard ratios for PCSM with RP as the reference were 1.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-1.98; p < 0.001) for BT, 1.55 (95% CI 1.26-1.91; p < 0.001) for EBRT, 2.36 (95% CI 1.94-2.87; p < 0.001) for PADT, and 1.76 (95% CI 1.30-2.40; p < 0.001) for AS/WW. In models for long-term outcomes, PCSM differences were negligible for low-risk disease and increased progressively with risk. Limitations include the evolution of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for PCa over time. In this nonrandomized study, the possibility of residual confounding remains salient. CONCLUSIONS In a large, prospective cohort of men with localized PCa, after adjustment for age and comorbidity, PCSM was lower after local therapy for those with higher-risk disease, and in particular after RP. Confirmation of these results via long-term follow-up of ongoing trials is awaited. PATIENT SUMMARY We evaluated different treatment options for localized prostate cancer in a large group of patients who were treated mostly in nonacademic medical centers. Results from nonrandomized trials should be interpret with caution, but even after careful risk adjustment, survival rates for men with higher-risk cancer appeared to be highest for patients whose first treatment was surgery rather than radiotherapy, hormones, or monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Herlemann
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Janet E Cowan
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Samuel L Washington
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anthony C Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeanette M Broering
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peter R Carroll
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
He X, Hu S, Wang C, Yang Y, Li Z, Zeng M, Song G, Li Y, Lu Q. Predicting prostate cancer recurrence: Introducing PCRPS, an advanced online web server. Heliyon 2024; 10:e28878. [PMID: 38623253 PMCID: PMC11016622 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the leading causes of cancer death in men. About 30% of PCa will develop a biochemical recurrence (BCR) following initial treatment, which significantly contributes to prostate cancer-related deaths. In clinical practice, accurate prediction of PCa recurrence is crucial for making informed treatment decisions. However, the development of reliable models and biomarkers for predicting PCa recurrence remains a challenge. In this study, the aim is to establish an effective and reliable tool for predicting the recurrence of PCa. Methods We systematically screened and analyzed potential datasets to predict PCa recurrence. Through quality control analysis, low-quality datasets were removed. Using meta-analysis, differential expression analysis, and feature selection, we identified key genes associated with recurrence. We also evaluated 22 previously published signatures for PCa recurrence prediction. To assess prediction performance, we employed nine machine learning algorithms. We compared the predictive capabilities of models constructed using clinical variables, expression data, and their combinations. Subsequently, we implemented these machine learning models into a user-friendly web server freely accessible to all researchers. Results Based on transcriptomic data derived from eight multicenter studies consisting of 733 PCa patients, we screened 23 highly influential genes for predicting prostate cancer recurrence. These genes were used to construct the Prostate Cancer Recurrence Prediction Signature (PCRPS). By comparing with 22 published signatures and four important clinicopathological features, the PCRPS exhibited a robust and significantly improved predictive capability. Among the tested algorithms, Random Forest demonstrated the highest AUC value of 0.72 in predicting PCa recurrence in the testing dataset. To facilitate access and usage of these machine learning models by all researchers and clinicians, we also developed an online web server (https://urology1926.shinyapps.io/PCRPS/) where the PCRPS model can be freely utilized. The tool can also be used to (1) predict the PCa recurrence by clinical information or expression data with high accuracy. (2) provide the possibility of PCa recurrence by nine machine learning algorithms. Furthermore, using the PCRPS scores, we predicted the sensitivity of 22 drugs from GDSC2 and 95 drugs from CTRP2 to the samples. These predictions provide valuable insights into potential drug sensitivities related to the PCRPS score groups. Conclusion Overall, our study provides an attractive tool to further guide the clinical management and individualized treatment for PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Chen Wang
- Department of Urology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), China
| | - Yongjun Yang
- Department of Urology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), China
| | - Zhuo Li
- Department of Urology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), China
| | - Mingqiang Zeng
- Department of Urology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), China
| | - Guangqing Song
- Department of Urology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), China
| | - Yuanwei Li
- Department of Urology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), China
| | - Qiang Lu
- Department of Urology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Crawford ED, Bryce AH, Hussain MH, Agarwal N, Beltran H, Cooperberg MR, Petrylak DP, Shore N, Spratt DE, Tagawa ST, Antonarakis ES, Aparicio AM, Armstrong AJ, Boike TP, Calais J, Carducci MA, Chapin BF, Cookson MS, Davis JW, Dorff T, Eggener SE, Feng FY, Gleave M, Higano C, Iagaru A, Morgans AK, Morris M, Murray KS, Poage W, Rettig MB, Sartor O, Scher HI, Sieber P, Small E, Srinivas S, Yu EY, Zhang T, Koo PJ. Expert Perspectives on Controversies in Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Management: Narrative Review and Report of the First US Prostate Cancer Conference Part 1. JU OPEN PLUS 2024; 2:e00029. [PMID: 38774466 PMCID: PMC11108024 DOI: 10.1097/ju9.0000000000000137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
Purpose Castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) is a complex and heterogeneous condition encompassing a range of clinical presentations. As new approaches have expanded management options, clinicians are left with myriad questions and controversies regarding the optimal individualized management of CSPC. Materials and Methods The US Prostate Cancer Conference (USPCC) multidisciplinary panel was assembled to address the challenges of prostate cancer management. The first annual USPCC meeting included experts in urology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and nuclear medicine. USPCC co-chairs and session moderators identified key areas of controversy and uncertainty in prostate cancer management and organized the sessions with multidisciplinary presentations and discussion. Throughout the meeting, experts responded to questions prepared by chairs and moderators to identify areas of agreement and controversy. Results The USPCC panel discussion and question responses for CSPC-related topics are presented. Key advances in CSPC management endorsed by USPCC experts included the development and clinical utilization of gene expression classifiers and artificial intelligence (AI) models for risk stratification and treatment selection in specific patient populations, the use of advanced imaging modalities in patients with clinically localized unfavorable intermediate or high-risk disease and those with biochemical recurrence, recommendations of doublet or triplet therapy for metastatic CSPC (mCSPC), and consideration of prostate and/or metastasis-directed radiation therapy in select patients with mCSPC. Conclusions CSPC is a diverse disease with many therapeutic options and the potential for adverse outcomes associated with either undertreatment or overtreatment. Future studies are needed to validate and clinically integrate novel technologies, including genomics, AI, and advanced imaging, to optimize outcomes among patients with CSPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. David Crawford
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Alan H. Bryce
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Maha H. Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew R. Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center/Genesis Care, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
| | | | - Scott T. Tagawa
- Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Ana M. Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew J. Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Brian F. Chapin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael S. Cookson
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - John W. Davis
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tanya Dorff
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Scott E. Eggener
- Departments of Surgery (Urology), University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Felix Y. Feng
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Martin Gleave
- Urological Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Celestia Higano
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Alicia K. Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Katie S. Murray
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Wendy Poage
- Prostate Conditions Education Council, Centennial, Colorado
| | - Matthew B. Rettig
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Departments of Medicine and Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Howard I. Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul Sieber
- Keystone Urology Specialists, Lancaster, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Sandy Srinivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Evan Y. Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Tian Zhang
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Utah Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Panaiyadiyan S, Kumar R. Prostate cancer nomograms and their application in Asian men: a review. Prostate Int 2024; 12:1-9. [PMID: 38523898 PMCID: PMC10960090 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Nomograms help to predict outcomes in individual patients rather than whole populations and are an important part of evaluation and treatment decision making. Various nomograms have been developed in malignancies to predict and prognosticate clinical outcomes such as severity of disease, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival. In prostate cancer, nomograms were developed for determining need for biopsy, disease course, need for adjuvant therapy, and outcomes. Most of these predictive nomograms were based on Caucasian populations. Prostate cancer is significantly affected by race, and Asian men have a significantly different racial and genetic susceptibility compared to Caucasians, raising the concern in generalizability of these nomograms. We reviewed the existing literature for nomograms in prostate cancer and their application in Asian men. There are very few studies that have evaluated the applicability and validity of the existing nomograms in these men. Most have found significant differences in the performance in this population. Thus, more studies evaluating the existing nomograms in Asian men or suggesting modifications for this population are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sridhar Panaiyadiyan
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rajeev Kumar
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Singh KB, London KI, Wong VCK, Mansberg R. Diagnostic accuracy of bone scan at different PSA levels in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2024; 55:91-96. [PMID: 38216344 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2023.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Bone Scan at different PSA levels for detecting skeletal metastases in men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of the statewide RIS-PACS to identify 251 men with biochemical recurrence who underwent both a Bone Scan and Ga68 PSMA PET/CT (within 2 months of each other) between September 2019 and December 2022 at a single institution. The Ga68 PSMA PET/CT report was considered to be the reference standard. RESULTS The median age was 72 years (IQR 67-76) with a median PSA level of 1 ng/ml (IQR 0.25-2.8). Using Ga68 PSMA PET/CT as the reference standard, 68/251 patients (25%) were positive for osseus metastases. Overall sensitivity and specificity of Bone Scan was 51% (95% CI 40-64%) and 99% (95% CI 98-100%) respectively. Using PSA banding, a PSA threshold of 20 ng/ml provided the greatest discriminatory benefit with sensitivity of the Bone Scan below the threshold being 46% (95% CI 33-59%) and above the threshold being 89% (95% CI 68-100%). Specificity remained consistently high both below and above this threshold. CONCLUSION Bone Scan provides greater diagnostic accuracy for detecting skeletal metastases in biochemical recurrence when the PSA level is above 20 ng/ml. This knowledge is valuable in optimising imaging algorithms in biochemical recurrence, particularly in regions where PSMA PET/CT is less readily available or affordable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karan B Singh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
| | - Kevin I London
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia; Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Veronica C K Wong
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia
| | - Robert Mansberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Xie S, Li L, Meng F, Wang H. Regional anesthesia might reduce recurrence and metastasis rates in adult patients with cancers after surgery: a meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:19. [PMID: 38200414 PMCID: PMC10777509 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02400-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of anesthesia techniques on cancer recurrence and metastasis following oncological surgery is a topic of growing interest. This meta-analysis investigates the potential effects of regional anesthesia (RA), either independently or combined with general anesthesia (GA), on these outcomes. METHODS We performed an extensive search across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcome was cancer recurrence, while the secondary outcomes were local recurrence and distant metastasis. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by utilizing random-effects models. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for quality assessment of observational studies, the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (Rob 2.0) was used for randomized controlled trials, and all the outcomes were assessed by using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS This study included 32 studies comprising 24,724 cancer patients. RA, either alone or in combination with GA, was significantly associated with reduced cancer recurrence compared to GA alone (OR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.94; p < 0.01). This association remained significant for prostate cancer patients in subgroup analyses (OR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.98; p = 0.04) and in the context of epidural anesthesia combined with GA. However, there were no significant associations noted for local recurrence or distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis provides evidence that RA, used alone or adjunctively with GA, is associated with a lower risk of cancer recurrence, particularly in patients with prostate cancer. However, no significant effects were observed on local recurrence or distant metastasis. Further prospective studies should be conducted to clarify this important issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Xie
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China
| | - Liang Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Fanqing Meng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jinan Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Shandong First medical university, Jinan, China
| | - Huanliang Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Takano S, Tomita N, Niwa M, Torii A, Takaoka T, Kita N, Uchiyama K, Nakanishi-Imai M, Ayakawa S, Iida M, Tsuzuki Y, Otsuka S, Manabe Y, Nomura K, Ogawa Y, Miyakawa A, Miyamoto A, Takemoto S, Yasui T, Hiwatashi A. Impact of radiation doses on clinical relapse of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:113. [PMID: 38167430 PMCID: PMC10761985 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50434-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The relationship between radiation doses and clinical relapse in patients receiving salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains unclear. We identified 292 eligible patients treated with SRT between 2005 and 2018 at 15 institutions. Clinical relapse-free survival (cRFS) between the ≥ 66 Gy (n = 226) and < 66 Gy groups (n = 66) were compared using the Log-rank test, followed by univariate and multivariate analyses and a subgroup analysis. After a median follow-up of 73 months, 6-year biochemical relapse-free survival, cRFS, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival rates were 58, 92, 98, and 94%, respectively. Six-year cRFS rates in the ≥ 66 Gy and < 66 Gy groups were 94 and 87%, respectively (p = 0.022). The multivariate analysis revealed that Gleason score ≥ 8, seminal vesicle involvement, PSA at BCR after RP ≥ 0.5 ng/ml, and a dose < 66 Gy correlated with clinical relapse (p = 0.015, 0.012, 0.024, and 0.0018, respectively). The subgroup analysis showed the consistent benefit of a dose ≥ 66 Gy in patients across most subgroups. Doses ≥ 66 Gy were found to significantly, albeit borderline, increase the risk of late grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity compared to doses < 66 Gy (14% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.055). This large multi-institutional retrospective study demonstrated that a higher SRT dose (≥ 66 Gy) resulted in superior cRFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiya Takano
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Natsuo Tomita
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.
| | - Masanari Niwa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Akira Torii
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Taiki Takaoka
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Nozomi Kita
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Kaoru Uchiyama
- Department of Radiology, Kariya Toyota General Hospital, 5-15 Sumiyoshi-Cho, Kariya, Aichi, 448-8505, Japan
| | - Mikiko Nakanishi-Imai
- Department of Radiology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, 2-9 Myoken-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8650, Japan
| | - Shiho Ayakawa
- Department of Radiology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Chukyo Hospital, 1-1-10 Sanjo, Minami-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 457-8510, Japan
| | - Masato Iida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Suzuka General Hospital, 1275-53 Yamanoue, Yasuzuka-Cho, Suzuka, Mie, 513-0818, Japan
| | - Yusuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, 1-1-1 Hirate-Cho, Kita-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Shinya Otsuka
- Department of Radiology, Okazaki City Hospital, 3-1 Goshoai, Koryuji-Cho, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-8553, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Manabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanbu Tokushukai General Hospital, 171-1 Hokama, Yaese-Cho, Shimajiri, Okinawa, 901-0493, Japan
| | - Kento Nomura
- Department of Radiotherapy, Nagoya City West Medical Center, 1-1-1 Hirate-Cho, Kita-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kasugai Municipal Hospital, 1-1-1 Takaki-Cho, Kasugai, Aichi, 486-8510, Japan
| | - Akifumi Miyakawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, 4-1-1, Sannomaru, Naka-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 460-0001, Japan
| | - Akihiko Miyamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokuto Hospital, 7-5 Kisen, Inada-Cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-0833, Japan
| | - Shinya Takemoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujieda Heisei Memorial Hospital, 123-1 Mizukami-Cho, Fujieda, Shizuoka, 426-8662, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yasui
- Department of Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Akio Hiwatashi
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhou J, Yu M, Ding J, Qi J. Does the Gleason Score 7 Upgrading Always Predict Worse Prognosis? Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:e412-e421. [PMID: 37248147 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical significance of Gleason score(GS) 7 upgraded on radical prostatectomy(RP) and its impact on the prognosis of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to study 8832 men diagnosed with M0 GS 3+4/4+3 prostate cancer (PCa) from 2010 to 2015 treated by RP. Logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of clinicopathological characteristics on the Gleason sore upgraded. Cox hazards regression analysis was performed to find significant factors of overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 6237 (70.6%) biopsy GS 3+4 patients and 2595(29.4%) biopsy GS 4+3 patients were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis found that prostate-specific antigen (PSA)>20ng/ml, T stage 3-4, lymph node metastasis are independent risk factors in predicting the incidence of GS upgraded after RP (all P<0.05). Through multivariate analysis, we found that black race, GS upgraded, chemotherapy played significant roles in predicting poor OS (all P<0.05). It was surprising to find that the biopsy GS upgraded in patients with PSA 0-4ng/ml and 4.1-10ng/ml had a significant association with poor OS (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that only in patients with PSA 4-10ng/ml, biopsy GS upgrade had a statistically important relationship with poor OS (P=0.046). CONCLUSIONS Not all patients with GS 7 upgraded had a worse prognosis than those without GS upgraded. Only in patients with PSA 4.1-10ng/ml, biopsy GS 7 upgraded was an independent risk factor affecting OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiatong Zhou
- Department of Urology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Minghao Yu
- Department of Urology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Ding
- Department of Urology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Jun Qi
- Department of Urology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Luzzago S, Colombo A, Mistretta FA, Alessi S, Di Trapani E, Summers PE, Piccinelli ML, Raimondi S, Vignati S, Clemente A, Rosati E, di Meglio L, d'Ascoli E, Scarabelli A, Zugni F, Belmonte M, Maggioni R, Ferro M, Fusco N, de Cobelli O, Musi G, Petralia G. Multiparametric MRI-based 5-year Risk Prediction Model for Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy. Radiology 2023; 309:e223349. [PMID: 37987657 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.223349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Current predictive tools to estimate the risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after treatment of prostate cancer do not consider multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) information. Purpose To develop a risk prediction tool that considers mpMRI findings to assess the risk of 5-year BCR after radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods In this retrospective single-center analysis in 1459 patients with prostate cancer who underwent mpMRI before radical prostatectomy (in 2012-2015), the outcome of interest was 5-year BCR (two consecutive prostate-specific antigen [PSA] levels > 0.2 ng/mL [0.2 µg/L]). Patients were randomly divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Kaplan-Meier plots were applied to the training set to estimate survival probabilities. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to test the relationship between BCR and different sets of exploratory variables. The C-index of the final model was calculated for the training and test sets and was compared with European Association of Urology, University of California San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and Partin risk tools using the partial likelihood ratio test. Five risk categories were created. Results The median duration of follow-up in the whole cohort was 59 months (IQR, 32-81 months); 376 of 1459 (25.8%) patients had BCR. A multivariable Cox regression model (referred to as PIPEN, and composed of PSA density, International Society of Urological Pathology grade group, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System category, European Society of Urogenital Radiology extraprostatic extension score, nodes) fitted to the training data yielded a C-index of 0.74, superior to that of other predictive tools (C-index 0.70 for all models; P ≤ .01) and a median higher C-index on 500 test set replications (C-index, 0.73). Five PIPEN risk categories were identified with 5-year BCR-free survival rates of 92%, 84%, 71%, 56%, and 26% in very low-, low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk patients, respectively (all P < .001). Conclusion A five-item model for predicting the risk of 5-year BCR after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer was developed and internally verified, and five risk categories were identified. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Aguirre and Ortegón in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Luzzago
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Alberto Colombo
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Francesco A Mistretta
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Sarah Alessi
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Ettore Di Trapani
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Paul E Summers
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Mattia Luca Piccinelli
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Sara Raimondi
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Silvano Vignati
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Alfredo Clemente
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Elisa Rosati
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Letizia di Meglio
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Elisa d'Ascoli
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Alice Scarabelli
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Fabio Zugni
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Maddalena Belmonte
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Roberta Maggioni
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Matteo Ferro
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Nicola Fusco
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Gennaro Musi
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- From the Department of Urology (S.L., F.A.M., E.D.T., M.L.P., M.F., O.D.C., G.M.), Division of Radiology (A.C., S.A., P.E.S., F.Z., M.B.), Department of Experimental Oncology (S.R., S.V.), Division of Pathology (N.F.), and Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (G.P.), European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology (S.L., F.A.M., N.F., O.D.C., G.M., G.P.) and Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics (E.R., L.D.M., E.D., A.S., R.M.), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and Radiology and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy (A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rao BV, Soni S, Kulkarni B, Bindhu MR, Ambekar A, Midha D, Kaushal S, Patil S, Jagdale R, Sundaram S, Kumar RM, Desai S, Menon S. Grossing and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens: An evidence-based approach. Indian J Cancer 2023; 60:449-457. [PMID: 38155443 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_1550_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy (RP) constitutes the primary treatment option for patients with clinically localized, biopsy-proven prostate cancer that requires local treatment with curative intent. Accurate reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens is required to guide further risk stratification and management of patients. Hence, for the handling and reporting of RP specimens, a standardized protocol should be followed. Many general pathologists may not be well-versed with the guidelines for the handling of radical prostatectomy specimens. This article discusses a detailed approach to grossing techniques, including specimen description, fixation requirements, gross cut-up, and reporting of the grade and stage of RP specimens. This will enable the pathologist to aid in multidisciplinary management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Vishal Rao
- Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Shailesh Soni
- Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Bijal Kulkarni
- Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - M R Bindhu
- Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | | | - Divya Midha
- Tata Medical Centre Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | | | - Sachin Patil
- Shri Siddhivinayak Ganapati Cancer Hospital, Miraj, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rakhi Jagdale
- Shri Siddhivinayak Ganapati Cancer Hospital, Miraj, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sandhya Sundaram
- Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - Sangeeta Desai
- Department of Pathology, Tata Medical Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Santosh Menon
- Department of Pathology, Tata Medical Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Volpe F, Nappi C, Piscopo L, Zampella E, Mainolfi CG, Ponsiglione A, Imbriaco M, Cuocolo A, Klain M. Emerging Role of Nuclear Medicine in Prostate Cancer: Current State and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4746. [PMID: 37835440 PMCID: PMC10571937 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most frequent epithelial neoplasia after skin cancer in men starting from 50 years and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) dosage can be used as an early screening tool. Prostate cancer imaging includes several radiological modalities, ranging from ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance to nuclear medicine hybrid techniques such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. Innovation in radiopharmaceutical compounds has introduced specific tracers with diagnostic and therapeutic indications, opening the horizons to targeted and very effective clinical care for patients with prostate cancer. The aim of the present review is to illustrate the current knowledge and future perspectives of nuclear medicine, including stand-alone diagnostic techniques and theragnostic approaches, in the clinical management of patients with prostate cancer from initial staging to advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michele Klain
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy; (F.V.); (C.N.); (L.P.); (E.Z.); (C.G.M.); (A.P.); (M.I.); (A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mapelli P, Ghezzo S, Pini C, Samanes Gajate AM, Spataro A, Bezzi C, Landoni C, Scifo P, Briganti A, Chiti A, Picchio M. Predictors of PSMA PET Positivity: Analysis in a Selected Cohort of Biochemical Recurrence Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4589. [PMID: 37760557 PMCID: PMC10526235 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Localized prostate cancer (PCa) can be treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Up to 30% of patients undergoing this procedure experience biochemical recurrence (BCR), namely the rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels during the post-surgical follow-up, requiring further treatments and with the risk of severe disease progression. Currently, the most accurate imaging technique to confirm, detect, and locate disease relapses in BCR patients is prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET, as recommended by international clinical guidelines. The aim of the study was to investigate potential clinical and pathological predictors of PSMA PET positivity, validated by clinical and instrumental follow-up or histopathological data. In this study, a selected cohort of BCR patients after RP and no other PCa-related therapy who underwent either PSMA PET/CT or PSMA PET/MRI has been analysed. Among the considered predictors, both pathological staging after RP equal or higher than pT3a and higher PSA levels at the time of the scan were significantly correlated with PSMA PET positivity on multivariate logistic regression analysis. As expected, PSMA PET confirmed its role as an accurate imaging technique in the setting of BCR in PCa. These findings may inform appropriate and tailored patient selection and scan timing to optimize and fully exploit this powerful diagnostic tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Mapelli
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (C.B.); (A.B.); (A.C.)
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Samuele Ghezzo
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (C.B.); (A.B.); (A.C.)
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Cristiano Pini
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (C.P.); (A.S.); (C.L.)
| | - Ana Maria Samanes Gajate
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Alessandro Spataro
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (C.P.); (A.S.); (C.L.)
| | - Carolina Bezzi
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (C.B.); (A.B.); (A.C.)
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Claudio Landoni
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (C.P.); (A.S.); (C.L.)
| | - Paola Scifo
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (C.B.); (A.B.); (A.C.)
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (C.B.); (A.B.); (A.C.)
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Maria Picchio
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (C.B.); (A.B.); (A.C.)
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (P.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhu X, Shao L, Liu Z, Liu Z, He J, Liu J, Ping H, Lu J. MRI-derived radiomics models for diagnosis, aggressiveness, and prognosis evaluation in prostate cancer. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2023; 24:663-681. [PMID: 37551554 PMCID: PMC10423970 DOI: 10.1631/jzus.b2200619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a pernicious tumor with high heterogeneity, which creates a conundrum for making a precise diagnosis and choosing an optimal treatment approach. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) with anatomical and functional sequences has evolved as a routine and significant paradigm for the detection and characterization of PCa. Moreover, using radiomics to extract quantitative data has emerged as a promising field due to the rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) and image data processing. Radiomics acquires novel imaging biomarkers by extracting imaging signatures and establishes models for precise evaluation. Radiomics models provide a reliable and noninvasive alternative to aid in precision medicine, demonstrating advantages over traditional models based on clinicopathological parameters. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of related studies of radiomics in PCa, specifically around the development and validation of radiomics models using MRI-derived image features. The current landscape of the literature, focusing mainly on PCa detection, aggressiveness, and prognosis evaluation, is reviewed and summarized. Rather than studies that exclusively focus on image biomarker identification and method optimization, models with high potential for universal clinical implementation are identified. Furthermore, we delve deeper into the critical concerns that can be addressed by different models and the obstacles that may arise in a clinical scenario. This review will encourage researchers to design models based on actual clinical needs, as well as assist urologists in gaining a better understanding of the promising results yielded by radiomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuehua Zhu
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Lizhi Shao
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
| | - Zhenyu Liu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
- School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China
| | - Zenan Liu
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Jide He
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Jiangang Liu
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
- Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Hao Ping
- Department of Urology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.
| | - Jian Lu
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sonni I, Dal Pra A, O'Connell DP, Ells Z, Benz M, Nguyen K, Yoon SM, Deng J, Smith C, Grogan T, Nickols NG, Cao M, Kishan AU, Calais J. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-Based Atlas for Prostate Bed Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Clinical Implications for Salvage Radiation Therapy Contouring Guidelines. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:902-909. [PMID: 36759200 PMCID: PMC10241009 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the patterns of prostate bed (PB) recurrence in prostate cancer patients experiencing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence (BCP) or biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA PET) in relation to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) clinical target volumes (CTVs). Methods: This single-center, retrospective analysis included patients with BCP or BCR after radical prostatectomy and PB recurrence on 68Ga-PSMA PET. The PB recurrences were delineated by nuclear medicine physicians, the CTVs by radiation oncologists contouring guidelines on the 68Ga-PSMA PET, respectively, masked from each other. The coverage of the 68Ga-PSMA PET recurrence was categorized as PSMA recurrence completely covered, partially covered, or not covered by the RTOG-based CTV. Further, we evaluated the differences in PSMA recurrence patterns among patients with different 68Ga-PSMA PET staging (miTNM). Mann-Whitney U tests, the chi-square test, and Spearman (ρ) correlation analysis were used to investigate associations between CTV coverage and 68Ga-PSMA PET-based tumor volume, serum PSA levels, miTNM, and rectal/bladder involvement. Results: A total of 226 patients were included in the analysis; 127 patients had PSMA recurrence limited to the PB (miTrN0M0), 30 had pelvic nodal disease (miTrN1M0), 32 had extrapelvic disease (miTrN0M1), and 37 had both pelvic nodal disease and extrapelvic disease (miTrN1M1). In the miTrN0M0 cohort, the recurrence involved the rectal and bladder walls in 12 of 127 (9%) and 4 of 127 (3%), respectively. The PSMA-positive PB recurrences were completely covered by the CTV in 68 of 127 patients (53%), partially covered in 43 of 127 (34%), and not covered in 16 of 127 (13%). Full coverage was associated with a smaller tumor volume (P = 0.043), a lack of rectal/bladder wall involvement (P = 0.03), and lower miTNM staging (P = 0.035) but not with lower serum PSA levels (P = 0.979). Conclusion: Our study suggests that 68Ga-PSMA PET can be a valuable tool for guiding salvage radiation therapy (SRT) planning directed to the PB in the setting of postoperative BCR or BCP. These data should be incorporated into the redefinition of PB contouring guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Sonni
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California;
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Dylan P O'Connell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Zachary Ells
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthias Benz
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kathleen Nguyen
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stephanie M Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jie Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Clayton Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tristan Grogan
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Nickolas G Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veteran Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Oh J, Tyldesley S, Pai H, McKenzie M, Halperin R, Duncan G, Morton G, Keyes M, Hamm J, Morris WJ. An Updated Analysis of the Survival Endpoints of ASCENDE-RT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1061-1070. [PMID: 36528488 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Using the primary endpoint of time to biochemical progression (TTP), Androgen Suppression Combined with Elective Nodal and Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy (ASCENDE-RT) randomized National Comprehensive Cancer Network patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer to low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (LDR-PB) or dose-escalated external beam boost (DE-EBRT). Randomization to the LDR-PB arm resulted in a 2-fold reduction in biochemical progression compared with the DE-EBRT group at a median follow-up of 6.5 years (P < .001). Herein, the primary endpoint and secondary survival endpoints of the ASCENDE-RT trial are updated at a 10-year median follow-up. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to either the LDR-PB or the DE-EBRT arm (1:1). All patients received 1 year of androgen deprivation therapy and 46 Gy in 23 fractions of pelvic RT. Patients in the DE-EBRT arm received an additional 32 Gy in 16 fractions, and those in the LDR-PB arm received an 125I implant prescribed to a minimum peripheral dose of 115 Gy. Two hundred patients were randomized to the DE-EBRT arm and 198 to the LDR-PB arm. RESULTS The 10-year Kaplan-Meier TTP estimate was 85% ± 5% for LDR-PB compared with 67% ± 7% for DE-EBRT (log rank P < .001). Ten-year time to distant metastasis (DM) was 88% ± 5% for the LDR-PB arm and 86% ± 6% for the DE-EBRT arm (P = .56). There were 117 (29%) deaths. Ten-year overall survival (OS) estimates were 80% ± 6% for the LDR-PB arm and 75% ± 7% for the DE-EBRT arm (P = .51). There were 30 (8%) patients who died of prostate cancer: 12 (6%) in the LDR-PB arm, including 2 treatment-related deaths, and 18 (9%) in the DE-EBRT arm. CONCLUSIONS Men randomized to the LDR-PB boost arm of the ASCENDE-RT trial continue to experience a large advantage in TTP compared with those randomized to the DE-EBRT arm. ASCENDE-RT was not powered to detect differences in its secondary survival endpoints (OS, DM, and time to prostate cancer-specific death) and none are apparent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Scott Tyldesley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Howard Pai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael McKenzie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ross Halperin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Graeme Duncan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mira Keyes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jeremy Hamm
- Department of Population Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - W James Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yu YP, Liu S, Ren BG, Nelson J, Jarrard D, Brooks JD, Michalopoulos G, Tseng G, Luo JH. Fusion Gene Detection in Prostate Cancer Samples Enhances the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes from Radical Prostatectomy through Machine Learning in a Multi-Institutional Analysis. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2023; 193:392-403. [PMID: 36681188 PMCID: PMC10123524 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2022.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer remains one of the most fatal malignancies in men in the United States. Predicting the course of prostate cancer is challenging given that only a fraction of prostate cancer patients experience cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. This study examined the expressions of 14 fusion genes in 607 prostate cancer samples from the University of Pittsburgh, Stanford University, and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The profiling of 14 fusion genes was integrated with Gleason score of the primary prostate cancer and serum prostate-specific antigen level to develop machine-learning models to predict the recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Machine-learning algorithms were developed by analysis of the data from the University of Pittsburgh cohort as a training set using the leave-one-out cross-validation method. These algorithms were then applied to the data set from the combined Stanford/Wisconsin cohort (testing set). The results showed that the addition of fusion gene profiling consistently improved the prediction accuracy rate of prostate cancer recurrence by Gleason score, serum prostate-specific antigen level, or a combination of both. These improvements occurred in both the training and testing cohorts and were corroborated by multiple models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan-Ping Yu
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Silvia Liu
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Bao-Guo Ren
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Joel Nelson
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David Jarrard
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - James D Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - George Michalopoulos
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - George Tseng
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jian-Hua Luo
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cooperberg MR, Meeks W, Fang R, Gaylis FD, Catalona WJ, Makarov DV. Time Trends and Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Management of Low-risk Prostate Cancer in the US. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e231439. [PMID: 36862409 PMCID: PMC9982696 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Active surveillance (AS) is endorsed by clinical guidelines as the preferred management strategy for low-risk prostate cancer, but its use in contemporary clinical practice remains incompletely defined. Objective To characterize trends over time and practice- and practitioner-level variation in the use of AS in a large, national disease registry. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study included men with low-risk prostate cancer, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) less than 10 ng/mL, Gleason grade group 1, and clinical stage T1c or T2a, newly diagnosed between January 1, 2014, and June 1, 2021. Patients were identified in the American Urological Association (AUA) Quality (AQUA) Registry, a large quality reporting registry including data from 1945 urology practitioners at 349 practices across 48 US states and territories, comprising more than 8.5 million unique patients. Data are collected automatically from electronic health record systems at participating practices. Exposures Exposures of interest included patient age, race, and PSA level, as well as urology practice and individual urology practitioners. Main Outcomes and Measures The outcome of interest was the use of AS as primary treatment. Treatment was determined through analysis of electronic health record structured and unstructured clinical data and determination of surveillance based on follow-up testing with at least 1 PSA level remaining greater than 1.0 ng/mL. Results A total of 20 809 patients in AQUA were diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer and had known primary treatment. The median age was 65 (IQR, 59-70) years; 31 (0.1%) were American Indian or Alaska Native; 148 (0.7%) were Asian or Pacific Islander; 1855 (8.9%) were Black; 8351 (40.1%) were White; 169 (0.8%) were of other race or ethnicity; and 10 255 (49.3%) were missing information on race or ethnicity. Rates of AS increased sharply and consistently from 26.5% in 2014 to 59.6% in 2021. However, use of AS varied from 4.0% to 78.0% at the urology practice level and from 0% to 100% at the practitioner level. On multivariable analysis, year of diagnosis was the variable most strongly associated with AS; age, race, and PSA value at diagnosis were all also associated with odds of surveillance. Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study of AS rates in the AQUA Registry found that national, community-based rates of AS have increased but remain suboptimal, and wide variation persists across practices and practitioners. Continued progress on this critical quality indicator is essential to minimize overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer and by extension to improve the benefit-to-harm ratio of national prostate cancer early detection efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew R. Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - William Meeks
- American Urological Association Education and Research Inc, Linthicum, Maryland
| | - Raymond Fang
- American Urological Association Education and Research Inc, Linthicum, Maryland
| | | | - William J. Catalona
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Belkacemi Y, Debbi K, Coraggio G, Bendavid J, Nourieh M, To NH, Cherif MA, Saldana C, Ingels A, De La Taille A, Loganadane G. Genomic Prostate Score: A New Tool to Assess Prognosis and Optimize Radiation Therapy Volumes and ADT in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030945. [PMID: 36765902 PMCID: PMC9913491 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic classifiers such as the Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) could help to personalize treatment for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (I-PCa). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the ability of the GPS to change therapeutic decision making in I-PCa. Only patients in the intermediate NCCN risk group with Gleason score 3 + 4 were considered. The primary objective was to assess the impact of the GPS on risk stratification: NCCN clinical and genomic risk versus NCCN clinical risk stratification alone. We also analyzed the predictive role of the GPS for locally advanced disease (≥pT3+) and the potential change in treatment strategy. Thirty patients were tested for their GPS between November 2018 and March 2020, with the median age being 70 (45-79). Twenty-three patients had a clinical T1 stage. Eighteen patients were classified as favorable intermediate risk (FIR) based on the NCCN criteria. The median GPS score was 39 (17-70). Among the 23 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy, Gleason score 3 + 4 was found in 18 patients. There was a significant correlation between the GPS and the percentage of a Gleason grade 4 or higher pattern in the surgical sample: correlation coefficient r = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.2-0.8; p = 0.005. In this study, the GPS combined with NCCN clinical risk factors resulted in significant changes in risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazid Belkacemi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-149814522 or +33-677439810
| | - Kamel Debbi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Gabriele Coraggio
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Jérome Bendavid
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Maya Nourieh
- Department of Pathology, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Nhu Hanh To
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Mohamed Aziz Cherif
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Carolina Saldana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Alexandre Ingels
- Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Alexandre De La Taille
- Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Gokoulakrichenane Loganadane
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Brain surgery offers the best chance of seizure-freedom for patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy, but only 50% achieve sustained seizure-freedom. With the explosion of data collected during routine presurgical evaluations and recent advances in computational science, we now have a tremendous potential to achieve precision epilepsy surgery: a data-driven tailoring of surgical planning. This review highlights the clinical need, the relevant computational science focusing on machine learning, and discusses some specific applications in epilepsy surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Jehi
- Cleveland Clinic Ringgold Standard Institution, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Detti B, Carnevale MG, Lucidi S, Burchini L, Caini S, Orsatti C, Bertini N, Roghi M, di Cataldo V, Fondelli S, Ingrosso G, Francolini G, Scartoni D, Sardaro A, Pisani A, Scoccianti S, Aristei C, Livi L. Choline PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1079808. [PMID: 37025599 PMCID: PMC10070677 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1079808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Biochemical recurrence (BR) occurs in up to 40% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with primary radical prostatectomy (RP). Choline PET/CT may show, in a single-step examination, the site of tumor recurrence earlier than traditional imaging methods, particularly at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, thus influencing subsequent treatment. Methods/patients Patients with recurrent and non-metastatic prostate cancer (nmPCa), who were assessed with choline PET/CT, were included in the analysis. Based on imaging results, the following therapeutic strategies were chosen: radiotherapy to the prostatic bed, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and chemotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to either the pelvic lymph nodes or distant metastases. We assessed the impact of age, PSA levels, Gleason score (GS), and adjuvant therapy on oncological outcomes. Results Data from 410 consecutive nmPCa patients with BR who underwent RP as primary treatment were analyzed. One hundred seventy-six (42.9%) patients had a negative choline PET/CT, and 234 (57.1%) patients resulted positive. In the multivariate analysis, only chemotherapy and PSA at recurrence were significant independent prognostic factors on overall survival (OS). In the PET-positive subgroup, the number of relapses, PSA post-prostatectomy, and chemotherapy impacted on OS. PSA (post-surgery and at recurrence) affected progression-free survival (PFS) in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, GS, the number of relapse sites, and PSA (post-surgery and at recurrence) were significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS). Conclusion Choline PET/CT provides better accuracy than conventional imaging for the assessment of nmPCa with BR after prostatectomy, thereby enabling salvage strategies and improving quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Detti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Carnevale
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sara Lucidi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Burchini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Saverio Caini
- Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network - Istituto per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologia (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Carolina Orsatti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Niccolò Bertini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Manuele Roghi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- *Correspondence: Manuele Roghi,
| | - Vanessa di Cataldo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Simona Fondelli
- Struttura Organizzativa Complessa (SOC) Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, Bagno a Ripoli, Firenze, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Scartoni
- Proton Therapy Center-Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | | | | | - Silvia Scoccianti
- Struttura Organizzativa Complessa (SOC) Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, Bagno a Ripoli, Firenze, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rans K, Charlien B, Filip A, Olivier DH, Julie DH, Céderic D, Herlinde D, Benedikt E, Karolien G, Annouschka L, Nick L, Kenneth P, Carl S, Koen S, Hans V, Ben V, Steven J, Gert DM. SPARKLE: a new spark in treating oligorecurrent prostate cancer: adding systemic treatment to stereotactic body radiotherapy or metastasectomy: key to long-lasting event-free survival? BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1294. [PMID: 36503429 PMCID: PMC9743623 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10374-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) significantly delays the initiation of palliative androgen deprivation therapy (pADT) in patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) with a positive impact on patient's quality of life. However, it remains unclear whether the addition of ADT improves polymetastatic free survival (PMFS) and metastatic castration refractory PCa-free survival (mCRPC-FS) and how long concomitant hormone therapy should be given. A significant overall survival (OS) benefit was shown when an androgen receptor targeted agent (ARTA) was added to pADT in patients with metastatic hormone sensitive PCa (HSPC). However, whether the addition of and ARTA to MDT in the treatment of oligorecurrent PCa results in better PMFS and mCRPC-FS has not been proven yet. METHODS & DESIGN Patients diagnosed with oligorecurrent HSPC (defined as a maximum of 5 extracranial metastases on PSMA PET-CT) will be randomized in a 1:1:1 allocation ratio between arm A: MDT alone, arm B: MDT with 1 month ADT, or arm C: MDT with 6 months ADT together with ARTA (enzalutamide 4 × 40 mg daily) for 6 months. Patients will be stratified by PSA doubling time (≤ 3 vs. > 3 months), number of metastases (1 vs. > 1) and initial localization of metastases (M1a vs. M1b and/or M1c). The primary endpoint is PMFS, and the secondary endpoints include mCRPC-FS, biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), clinical progression free survival (cPFS), cancer specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL) and toxicity. DISCUSSION This is the first prospective multicentre randomized phase III trial that investigates whether the addition of short-term ADT during 1 month or short-term ADT during 6 months together with an ARTA to MDT significantly prolongs PMFS and/or mCRPC-FS. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05352178, registered April 28, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kato Rans
- grid.410569.f0000 0004 0626 3338Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Berghen Charlien
- grid.410569.f0000 0004 0626 3338Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ameye Filip
- grid.420034.10000 0004 0612 8849Department of Urology, AZ Maria Middelares Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - De Hertogh Olivier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Verviers, Verviers, Belgium
| | - den Hartog Julie
- grid.410569.f0000 0004 0626 3338Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Draulans Céderic
- grid.410569.f0000 0004 0626 3338Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dumez Herlinde
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Engels Benedikt
- grid.478056.80000 0004 0439 8570Department of Radiation Oncology, AZ Delta Roeselare-Menen-Torhout, Roeselare, Belgium
| | - Goffin Karolien
- grid.410569.f0000 0004 0626 3338Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laenen Annouschka
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liefhooghe Nick
- grid.420028.c0000 0004 0626 4023Department of Radiation Oncology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Poels Kenneth
- grid.410569.f0000 0004 0626 3338Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Salembier Carl
- grid.459485.10000 0004 0614 4793Department of Radiotherapy, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Vanneste Ben
- grid.410566.00000 0004 0626 3303Department of Human Structure and Repair; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joniau Steven
- grid.410569.f0000 0004 0626 3338Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - De Meerleer Gert
- grid.410569.f0000 0004 0626 3338Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Li PI, Chen SJ, Chen YH, Chen WC, Huang CP. Comparative Outcomes of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58121820. [PMID: 36557022 PMCID: PMC9782116 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58121820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The effectiveness of radical prostatectomy alone for locally advanced prostate cancer is controversial owing to an increased complication rate and treatment-related morbidity. With technical advances and refinements in surgical techniques, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has improved the outcomes of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. RARP therefore plays a role in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer. In this study, we enrolled a total of 76 patients with pathologic stage pT3a, pT3b, pT4, or pN1. All patients were followed from surgery to June 2022, and their characteristics, perioperative outcomes, complications, adjuvant therapies and outcomes were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 69 years, and the initial PSA level was 20.5 (IQR 10.8-31.6) ng/mL. The median operative time was 205 (IQR 182-241) minutes. Sixty-six patients (86.8%) regained continence within 1 year, and the continence rate within 3 years of follow-up was 90.8% (69 patients). The overall survival rate was 100%. Twenty-two patients had BCR, of whom 13 received salvage androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), 2 received salvage external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone, and 7 received combined ADT and EBRT. No patient had disease progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer during a median 36 months of follow-up after salvage therapy. Our results suggest that RARP can also decrease tumor burden and allow for accurate and precise pathological staging with the need for subsequent treatment. Therefore, we recommend that RARP represents a well-standardized, safe, and oncologically effective option for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-I Li
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan
| | - Szu-Ju Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Hsiang Chen
- Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- Department of Psychology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chi Chen
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Li B, Duan L, Shi J, Han Y, Wei W, Cheng X, Cao Y, Kader A, Ding D, Wu X, Gao Y. Diagnostic performance of 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA SPECT/CT for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1072437. [PMID: 36568205 PMCID: PMC9768541 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1072437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA is a novel technetium-99m-labeled small-molecule inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for detection of prostate cancer. The present study investigated the diagnostic yield of 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in 147 patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Methods 147 patients with biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy were finally eligible for this retrospective analysis. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 8.26 ng/mL (range, 0.22-187.40 ng/mL). Of the 147 patients, 72 patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) at least 6 months before the 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA SPECT/CT. All patients underwent planar whole-body scans and subsequent SPECT/CT of the thoracic and abdominal regions after intravenous injection of 705 ± 70 MBq of 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA. Images were evaluated for the presence and location of PSMA-positive lesions, in which SUVmax were also measured. Detection rates were stratified according to PSA levels, ADT and Gleason scores. The relationships between SUVmax and clinical characteristics were analyzed using univariate and multivariable linear regression models for patients with positive findings. Results Of the 147 patients, 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA SPECT/CT revealed at least one positive lesion in 118 patients with a high detection rate (80.3%). The detection rates were 48.6% (17/35), 85.1% (40/47), 92.1% (35/38), and 96.3% (26/27) at PSA levels of greater than 0.2 to 2, greater than 2 to 5, greater than 5 to 10, and greater than 10 ng/mL, respectively. PSMA SPECT/CT indicated local recurrence, lymph node metastases, bone metastases, and visceral metastases in 14 (9.5%), 73 (49.7%), 48 (32.7%) and 3 (2.0%) patients. The detection rates of local recurrence and metastasis increased with increasing PSA levels. The detection rate was higher in patients treated with ADT than those without (90.3% vs. 70.7%; P =0.0029). In patients with Gleason scores ≥8, detection rate was slightly higher than those with ≤7 (81.7% vs. 78.5%), but not statistically significant (P = 0.6265). Multivariable linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation of PSA levels and ADT with SUVmax (P=0.0005 and P=0.0397). Conclusions 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA SPECT/CT offers high detection rates for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. The detection rate and SUVmax were positively correlated with PSA levels and ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Li
- Henan Key Laboratory for Molecular Nuclear Medicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China,Department of Medical Imaging, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps 13 division Red Star Hospital, Hami, China
| | - Lili Duan
- Henan Key Laboratory for Molecular Nuclear Medicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jingqi Shi
- Henan Key Laboratory for Molecular Nuclear Medicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yunyun Han
- Henan Key Laboratory for Molecular Nuclear Medicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Urology Surgery, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiaoliang Cheng
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong Universityl, Xi’an, China
| | - Yong Cao
- Department of Medical Imaging, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps 13 division Red Star Hospital, Hami, China
| | - Akeban Kader
- Department of Medical Imaging, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps 13 division Red Star Hospital, Hami, China,*Correspondence: Yongju Gao, ; Xinyu Wu, ; Degang Ding, ; Akeban Kader,
| | - Degang Ding
- Department of Urology Surgery, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China,*Correspondence: Yongju Gao, ; Xinyu Wu, ; Degang Ding, ; Akeban Kader,
| | - Xinyu Wu
- Henan Key Laboratory for Molecular Nuclear Medicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China,*Correspondence: Yongju Gao, ; Xinyu Wu, ; Degang Ding, ; Akeban Kader,
| | - Yongju Gao
- Henan Key Laboratory for Molecular Nuclear Medicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China,*Correspondence: Yongju Gao, ; Xinyu Wu, ; Degang Ding, ; Akeban Kader,
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nocera L, Stolzenbach LF, Collà Ruvolo C, Wenzel M, Wurnschimmel C, Tian Z, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Mirone V, Chun FKH, Shariat SF, Graefen M, Saad F, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Predicting the probability of pT3 or higher pathological stage at radical prostatectomy: COVID19-specific considerations. Front Oncol 2022; 12:990851. [PMID: 36561531 PMCID: PMC9763886 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.990851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We tested whether a model identifying prostate cancer (PCa) patients at risk of pT3-4/pN1 can be developed for use during COVID19 pandemic, in order to guarantee appropriate treatment to patients harboring advanced disease patients without compromising sustainability of care delivery. Methods Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database 2010-2016, we identified 27,529 patients with localized PCa and treated with radical prostatectomy. A multivariable logistic regression model predicting presence of pT3-4/pN1 disease was fitted within a development cohort (n=13,977, 50.8%). Subsequently, external validation (n=13,552, 49.2%) and head-to-head comparison with NCCN risk group stratification was performed. Results In model development, age, PSA, biopsy Gleason Grade Group (GGG) and percentage of positive biopsy cores were independent predictors of pT3-4/pN1 stage. In external validation, prediction of pT3-4/pN1 with novel nomogram was 74% accurate versus 68% for NCCN risk group stratification. Nomogram achieved better calibration and showed net-benefit over NCCN risk group stratification in decision curve analyses. The use of nomogram cut-off of 49% resulted in pT3-4/pN1 rate of 65%, instead of the average 35%. Conclusion The newly developed, externally validated nomogram predicts presence of pT3-4/pN1 better than NCCN risk group stratification and allows to focus radical prostatectomy treatment on individuals at highest risk of pT3-4/pN1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Nocera
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada,Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy,*Correspondence: Luigi Nocera,
| | - Lara F. Stolzenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada,Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada,Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada,Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christoph Wurnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada,Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mirone
- Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Felix K. H. Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria,Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czechia,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Oh SW, Suh M, Cheon GJ. Current Status of PSMA-Targeted Radioligand Therapy in the Era of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Acquiring Marketing Authorization. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 56:263-281. [PMID: 36425273 PMCID: PMC9679068 DOI: 10.1007/s13139-022-00764-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed in PCa, which gradually increases in high-grade tumors, metastatic tumors, and tumors nonresponsive to androgen deprivation therapy. PSMA has been a topic of interest during the past decade for both diagnostic and therapeutic targets. Radioligand therapy (RLT) utilizes the delivery of radioactive nuclides to tumors and tumor-associated targets, and it has shown better efficacy with minimal toxicity compared to other systemic cancer therapies. Nuclear medicine has faced a new turning point claiming theranosis as the core of academic identity, since new RLTs have been introduced to clinics through the official new drug development processes for approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or European Medical Agency. Recently, PSMA targeting RLT was approved by the US FDA in March 2022. This review introduces PSMA RLT focusing on ongoing clinical trials to enhance our understanding of nuclear medicine theranosis and strive for the development of new radiopharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- So Won Oh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, 07061 Korea
| | - Minseok Suh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080 Korea
| | - Gi Jeong Cheon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080 Korea
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Andolfi C, Vickers AJ, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Cowan JE, Paner GP, Helfand BT, Liauw SL, Eggener SE. Blood Prostate-specific Antigen by Volume of Benign, Gleason Pattern 3 and 4 Prostate Tissue. Urology 2022; 170:154-160. [PMID: 35987380 PMCID: PMC10515713 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate how blood levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relate to prostate volume of benign tissue, Gleason pattern 3 (GP3) and Gleason pattern 4 (GP4) cancer. METHODS The cohort included 2209 consecutive men undergoing radical prostatectomy at 2 academic institutions with pT2N0, Grade Group 1-4 prostate cancer and an undetectable postoperative PSA. Volume of benign, GP3, and GP4 were estimated. The primary analysis evaluated the association between PSA and volume of each type of tissue using multivariable linear regression. R2, a measure of explained variation, was calculated using a multivariable model. RESULTS Estimated contribution to PSA was 0.04/0.06 ng/mL/cc for benign, 0.08/0.14 ng/mL/cc for GP3, and 0.62/0.80 ng/ml/cc for GP4 for the 2 independent cohorts, respectively. GP4 was associated with 6 to 8-fold more PSA per cc compared to GP3 and 15-fold higher compared to benign tissue. We did not observe a difference between PSA per cc for GP3 vs. benign tissue (P = 0.2). R2 decreased only slightly when removing age (0.006/0.018), volume of benign tissue (0.051/0.054) or GP3 (0.014/0.023) from the model. When GP4 was removed, R2 decreased 0.051/0.310. PSA density (PSA divided by prostate volume) was associated with volume of GP4 but not GP3, after adjustment for benign volume. CONCLUSION Gleason pattern 4 cancer contributes considerably more to PSA and PSA density per unit volume compared to GP3 and benign tissue. Contributions from GP3 and benign are similar. Further research should examine the utility of determining clinical management recommendations by absolute volume of GP4 rather than the ratio of GP3 to GP4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciro Andolfi
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Peter R Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Janet E Cowan
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Gladell P Paner
- Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Stanley L Liauw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Scott E Eggener
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wasim S, Lee SY, Kim J. Complexities of Prostate Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:14257. [PMID: 36430730 PMCID: PMC9696501 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232214257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer has a long disease history and a wide variety and uncertainty in individual patients' clinical progress. In recent years, we have seen a revolutionary advance in both prostate cancer patient care and in the research field. The power of deep sequencing has provided cistromic and transcriptomic knowledge of prostate cancer that has not discovered before. Our understanding of prostate cancer biology, from bedside and molecular imaging techniques, has also been greatly advanced. It is important that our current theragnostic schemes, including our diagnostic modalities, therapeutic responses, and the drugs available to target non-AR signaling should be improved. This review article discusses the current progress in the understanding of prostate cancer biology and the recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sobia Wasim
- Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon 21936, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Yoon Lee
- Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon 21936, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaehong Kim
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon 21999, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ferrari C, Mammucci P, Lavelli V, Pisani AR, Nappi AG, Rubini D, Sardaro A, Rubini G. [ 18F]fluciclovine vs. [ 18F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients. Tomography 2022; 8:2709-2722. [PMID: 36412685 PMCID: PMC9680271 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8060226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Nowadays, there is still no consensus on the most accurate PET radiopharmaceutical to early detect prostate cancer (PCa) relapse. A tailored radiotracer choice based on a specific patient's profile could ensure prompt disease detection and an improvement in patients management. We aimed to compare the [18F]fluciclovine and [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT detection rate (DR) in PCa patients restaged for early biochemical recurrence (BCR), according to clinical and biochemical features. A cohort of 138 PCa patients with early BCR (mean age: 71 y, range: 50-87 y) were homogeneously randomized 1:1 to a [18F]fluciclovine or a [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT group. The respective PET/CT DR, according to per-patient and per-region analysis, and the impact of the biochemical, clinical, and histological parameters, were compared. The PSA cut-off values predictive of a positive scan were also calculated. Overall, the [18F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR was 64%, significantly higher than the [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT DR of 35% (p = 0.001). Similarly, in the per-region analysis, the [18F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR was 51% in the prostate region, significantly higher compared to 15% of [18F]fluorocholine (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, a statistically significant higher DR in per-patient and per-region (prostate/prostate bed) analysis was observed in the [18F]fluciclovine group for 0.5-1 ng/mL (p = 0.018, p = 0.049) and >1 ng/mL (p = 0.040, p < 0.0001) PSA values. A PSA of 0.45 ng/mL for [18F]fluciclovine and of 0.94 ng/mL for [18F]fluorocholine was identified as the optimal cut-off value in predicting a positive PET/CT scan. Our results demonstrated a better [18F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR compared to [18F]fluorocholine for restaging PCa patients in early BCR, particularly in the detection of locoregional recurrence. The significantly higher [18F]fluciclovine DR for low PSA values (PSA < 1 ng/mL) supports its use in this setting of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Ferrari
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Paolo Mammucci
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Valentina Lavelli
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Rosario Pisani
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Anna Giulia Nappi
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Dino Rubini
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Angela Sardaro
- Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rubini
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wang Y, Wu N, Wang K, Liao Y, Guo J, Zhong B, Guo T, Liang J, Jiang N. Specific classification and new therapeutic targets for neuroendocrine prostate cancer: A patient-based, diagnostic study. Front Genet 2022; 13:955133. [PMID: 36118857 PMCID: PMC9479159 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.955133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is an aggressive variant of prostate cancer (PC) that may arise de novo or in patients previously treated with hormonal therapies for prostate adenocarcinoma as a mechanism of resistance. In our investigation, there appeared to be a strong correlation between neuroendocrine differentiation prostate cancer (NEDPC) and NEPC. The objectives of this study included exploring whether NEDPC is an intermediate stage in the progression of high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) to NEPC and identifying risk factors and new targets associated with survival in the treatment of NEPC. Methods: The selected prostate cancer patients were progressed to high-risk and characterized by neuroendocrine. We collected the clinical data and characteristics of patients with three types of cancer: the incidence of metastasis, site and time of metastasis, recurrence rate, related treatment methods, etc. The similarity and differences of the three groups were compared through experiment and database. Results: By analyzing the clinical data and immunohistochemical results, we found that there seems to be a clinical feature of neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) status in between when patients progress from PC to NEPC. Finding novel treatment targets would therefore be beneficial by taking into account NEDPC as the stage of PC progression prior to NEPC. The metastasis-free survival curve and the immunohistochemical results are informing us that NEDPC can be a pre-state for diagnosing NEPC. Conclusion: NEPC is a late PC symptom that is frequently disregarded and has a bad prognosis. Finding novel treatment targets would therefore be beneficial by taking into account NEDPC as the stage of PC progression prior to NEPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- YouZhi Wang
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Ning Wu
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, State Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Tianjin, China
| | - KeKe Wang
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - YiHao Liao
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - JiaNing Guo
- Department of Pathology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - BoQiang Zhong
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Tao Guo
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - JiaMing Liang
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Ning Jiang
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
18F-Fluoroethylcholine PET/CT Radiomic Analysis for Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients: A Monocentric Study. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23169120. [PMID: 36012384 PMCID: PMC9409104 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23169120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study is to assess whether there are some correlations between radiomics and baseline clinical-biological data of prostate cancer (PC) patients using Fluorine-18 Fluoroethylcholine (18F-FECh) PET/CT. Methods: Digital rectal examination results (DRE), Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) serum levels, and bioptical-Gleason Score (GS) were retrospectively collected in newly diagnosed PC patients and considered as outcomes of PC. Thereafter, Volumes of interest (VOI) encompassing the prostate of each patient were drawn to extract conventional and radiomic PET features. Radiomic bivariate models were set up using the most statistically relevant features and then trained/tested with a cross-fold validation test. The best bivariate models were expressed by mean and standard deviation to the normal area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (mAUC, sdAUC). Results: Semiquantitative and radiomic analyses were performed on 67 consecutive patients. tSUVmean and tSkewness were significant DRE predictors at univariate analysis (OR 1.52 [1.01; 2.29], p = 0.047; OR 0.21 [0.07; 0.65], p = 0.007, respectively); moreover, tKurtosis was an independent DRE predictor at multivariate analysis (OR 0.64 [0.42; 0.96], p = 0.03) Among the most relevant bivariate models, szm_2.5D.z.entr + cm.clust.tend was a predictor of PSA levels (mAUC 0.83 ± 0.19); stat.kurt + stat.entropy predicted DRE (mAUC 0.79 ± 0.10); cm.info.corr.1 + szm_2.5D.szhge predicted GS (mAUC 0.78 ± 0.16). Conclusions: tSUVmean, tSkewness, and tKurtosis were predictors of DRE results only, while none of the PET parameters predicted PSA or GS significantly; 18F-FECh PET/CT radiomic models should be tested in larger cohort studies of newly diagnosed PC patients.
Collapse
|
39
|
The Role of PSMA PET/CT in the Primary Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Prostate Cancer-A Practical Clinical Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153638. [PMID: 35892897 PMCID: PMC9367536 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The combination of positron emission tomography (PET)-diagnostics with ligands binding to the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been a diagnostic milestone in the situation of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer and is gaining importance in primary diagnostics, providing a highly specific and sensitive diagnostic method in various clinical situations. However, the clinical application of this method requires a comprehensive knowledge of its advantages and disadvantages, potential pitfalls and influencing factors. This review aims to provide a practical clinical review of the currently available background data on PSMA PET/CT, as well as the clinical implications. Although a large amount of data already exist, a thorough analysis is complicated by study heterogeneity, showing the need for future systematic and prospective research. Abstract The importance of PSMA PET/CT in both primary diagnostics and prostate cancer recurrence has grown steadily since its introduction more than a decade ago. Over the past years, a vast amount of data have been published on the diagnostic accuracy and the impact of PSMA PET/CT on patient management. Nevertheless, a large heterogeneity between studies has made reaching a consensus difficult; this review aims to provide a comprehensive clinical review of the available scientific literature, covering the currently known data on physiological and pathological PSMA expression, influencing factors, the differences and pitfalls of various tracers, as well as the clinical implications in initial TNM-staging and in the situation of biochemical recurrence. This review has the objective of providing a practical clinical overview of the advantages and disadvantages of the examination in various clinical situations and the body of knowledge available, as well as open questions still requiring further research.
Collapse
|
40
|
Wo Q, Liu Z, Hu L. Identification of Ferroptosis-Associated Genes in Prostate Cancer by Bioinformatics Analysis. Front Genet 2022; 13:852565. [PMID: 35860472 PMCID: PMC9289098 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.852565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In order to reveal the functions of ferroptosis in prostate cancer (PCa), a ferroptosis potential index (FPI) was built. This study researched the influence of ferroptosis on gene mutations, various cellular signaling pathways, biochemical recurrence (BCR), and drug resistance in both FPI-high and FPI-low groups. Methods: RNA-seq, somatic mutation data, and clinical data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). FPI values were calculated. All samples were divided into FPI-high and FPI-low groups. The BCR-free survival rate, tumor mutation burden (TMB) value, cellular signaling pathway, differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and drug resistance in the two FPI groups were identified. Human PCa cells, LNCaP, were treated with ferroptosis inducer erastin or inhibitor ferrostatin-1. The expression of hub genes was detected by qRT-PCR and Western blot. Results: A high FPI level was significantly related to poor BCR-free survival. Also, higher TMB value was found in the FPI-high group, and FPI was shown to be associated with gene mutations. Then, genes in both groups were revealed to be enriched in different pathways. A total of 310 DEGs were identified to be involved in muscle system processes and neuroactive ligand–receptor interactions. A total of 101 genes were found to be related to BCR-free survival, and a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed. Two sub-modules were identified by MCODE, and eight hub genes were screened out, among which SYT4 had higher expression levels and poorer BCR-free survival in the FPI-high group, while the remaining hub genes had lower expression levels and poorer BCR-free survival. Drug sensitivity was revealed to be different in the two groups by study on the IC50 data of different molecules and ferroptosis regulator gene (FRG) expressions. Finally, erastin increased the expression of SYT4 in LNCaP and decreased the expression of the other four genes (ACTC1, ACTA1, ACTN2, and MYH6), while ferrostatin-1 led to the opposite results. The molecular experimental results were consistent with those of bioinformatics analysis, except TNNI1, TNNC2, and NRAP. Conclusion: The current research depicted the ferroptosis level and FRGs in PCa. Ferroptosis was related to TMB value, BCR-free survival, and drug resistance. This study will be beneficial to further research studies on ferroptosis-related molecular mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qijun Wo
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhenghong Liu
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Linyi Hu
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Linyi Hu,
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer after Primary Treatment with Curative Intent-Impact of Delayed Imaging. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11123311. [PMID: 35743385 PMCID: PMC9225064 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) on prostate cancer cells and its metastases allows its use in diagnostics using PET/CT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of delayed phase images in the Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Methods: 108 patients with prostate cancer (median age: 68.5 years, range: 49−83) were referred for Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT due to biochemical relapse (PSA (prostate-specific antigen) (3.2 ± 5.4 ng/mL). Examinations were performed at 60 min, with an additional delayed phase of the pelvis region at 120−180 min. Results: The Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT showed lesions in 86/108 (80%) patients; detection rate depending on the PSA level: 0.2 < PSA < 0.5 ng/mL vs. 0.5 ≤ PSA < 1.0 ng/mL vs. 1.0 ≤ PSA < 2.0 ng/mL vs. PSA ≥ 2.0 ng/mL was 56% (standard vs. delay: 56 vs. 56%) vs. 60% (52 vs. 60%) vs. 87% (83 vs. 87%) vs. 82% (77 vs. 82%) of patients, respectively. The delayed phase had an impact on the treatment in 14/86 patients (16%) (p < 0.05): 7 pts increased uptake was seen only after 60 min, which was interpreted as physiological or inflammatory accumulation; the delayed image showed increased accumulation in 7 patients only: 4 in regional lymph nodes, 1 in local recurrence, and 2 patients with local recurrence showed additional foci. Conclusions: Delayed phase of Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT has an impact on treatment management in 16% of patients.
Collapse
|
42
|
Perry E, Talwar A, Taubman K, Ng M, Wong LM, Sutherland TR. Pathological predictors of 18 F-DCFPyL prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2022; 130 Suppl 1:28-36. [PMID: 35768883 PMCID: PMC9540526 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To assess the correlation of pathological radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen features and prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) characteristics to imaging findings on subsequent 18F‐DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with biochemical failure (BF). Patients and Methods Retrospective analysis of combined 18F‐DCFPyL PET/CT database of patients from centres in Australia and New Zealand was performed. A total of 205 patients presenting with BF after RP were included in this study. Imaging findings on 18F‐DCFPyL PET/CT were recorded and correlated with the PSA characteristics at BF and pathological features of the original tumour. Results Of the 205 patients, 120 (58.5%) had evidence of abnormal prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression compatible with recurrent prostate cancer. Increasing PSA velocity (P = 0.01), International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (P = 0.02), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.05) and nodal positivity (P = 0.02) at the time of RP were more likely to demonstrate PSMA positivity. Multivariable logistic regression revealed a higher PSA level prior to PSMA PET/CT (P < 0.01), adjuvant radiotherapy (P = 0.09), Gleason score ≥8 (P < 0.01) and nodal positivity (P = 0.05) were all predictive of PSMA positivity. Conclusion 18F‐DCFPyL PET/CT positivity, both generally and site specific, correlates with PSA and RP pathological factors. Our results echo cohorts focussing on post‐RP patients, those imaged with 68Ga‐PSMA and those concerning biochemical persistence. Nomograms that include risk factors for ‘PSMA‐positive recurrence’ in the BF population may increase the catchment of patients with disease confined to the prostate bed or pelvis who have a greater probability of prolonged disease‐free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Perry
- Pacific Radiology, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.,Department of Medical Imaging, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Arpit Talwar
- Department of Medical Imaging, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Kim Taubman
- Department of Medical Imaging, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Michael Ng
- GenesisCare, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Lih-Ming Wong
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Tom R Sutherland
- Department of Medical Imaging, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pollack A, Karrison TG, Balogh AG, Gomella LG, Low DA, Bruner DW, Wefel JS, Martin AG, Michalski JM, Angyalfi SJ, Lukka H, Faria SL, Rodrigues GB, Beauchemin MC, Lee RJ, Seaward SA, Allen AM, Monitto DC, Seiferheld W, Sartor O, Feng F, Sandler HM. The addition of androgen deprivation therapy and pelvic lymph node treatment to prostate bed salvage radiotherapy (NRG Oncology/RTOG 0534 SPPORT): an international, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 2022; 399:1886-1901. [PMID: 35569466 PMCID: PMC9819649 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01790-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In men with a detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after prostatectomy for prostate cancer, salvage prostate bed radiotherapy (PBRT) results in about 70% of patients being free of progression at 5 years. A three-group randomised trial was designed to determine whether incremental gains in patient outcomes can be achieved by adding either 4-6 months of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to PBRT, or both short-term ADT and pelvic lymph node radiotherapy (PLNRT) to PBRT. METHODS The international, multicentre, randomised, controlled SPPORT trial was done at 283 radiation oncology cancer treatment centres in the USA, Canada, and Israel. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) were those who after prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate had a persistently detectable or an initially undetectable and rising PSA of between 0·1 and 2·0 ng/mL. Patients with and without lymphadenectomy (N0/Nx) were eligible if there was no clinical or pathological evidence of lymph node involvement. Other eligibility criteria included pT2 or pT3 disease, prostatectomy Gleason score of 9 or less, and a Zubrod performance status of 0-1. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive PBRT alone at a dose of 64·8-70·2 Gy at 1·8 Gy per fraction daily (group 1), PBRT plus short-term ADT (group 2), or PLNRT (45 Gy at 1·8 Gy per fraction, and then a volume reduction made to the planning target volume for the remaining 19·8-25 ·2 Gy) plus PBRT plus short-term ADT (group 3). The primary endpoint was freedom from progression, in which progression was defined as biochemical failure according to the Phoenix definition (PSA ≥2 ng/mL over the nadir PSA), clinical failure (local, regional, or distant), or death from any cause. A planned interim analysis of 1191 patents with minimum potential follow-up time of 5 years applied a Haybittle-Peto boundary of p<0·001 (one sided) for comparison of 5-year freedom from progression rates between the treatment groups. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00567580. The primary objectives of the trial have been completed, although long-term follow-up is continuing. FINDINGS Between March 31, 2008, and March 30, 2015, 1792 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the three treatment groups (592 to group 1 [PBRT alone], 602 to group 2 [PBRT plus short-term ADT], and 598 to group 3 [PLNRT plus PBRT plus short-term ADT]). 76 patients subsequently found to be ineligible were excluded from the analyses; thus, the evaluable patient population comprised 1716 patients. At the interim analysis (n=1191 patients; data cutoff May 23, 2018), the Haybittle-Peto boundary for 5-year freedom from progression was exceeded when group 1 was compared with group 3 (difference 17·9%, SE 2·9%; p<0·0001). The difference between groups 2 and 3 did not exceed the boundary (p=0·0063). With additional follow-up beyond the interim analysis (the final planned analysis; data cutoff May 26, 2021), at a median follow-up among survivors of 8·2 years (IQR 6·6-9·4), the 5-year freedom from progression rates in all 1716 eligible patients were 70·9% (95% CI 67·0-74·9) in group 1, 81·3% (78·0-84·6) in group 2, and 87·4% (84·7-90·2) in group 3. Per protocol criteria, freedom from progression in group 3 was superior to groups 1 and 2. Acute (≤3 months after radiotherapy) grade 2 or worse adverse events were significantly more common in group 3 (246 [44%] of 563 patients) than in group 2 (201 [36%] of 563; p=0·0034), which, in turn, were more common than in group 1 (98 [18%] of 547; p<0·0001). Similar findings were observed for grade 3 or worse adverse events. However, late toxicity (>3 months after radiotherapy) did not differ significantly between the groups, apart from more late grade 2 or worse blood or bone marrow events in group 3 versus group 2 (one-sided p=0·0060) attributable to the addition of PLNRT in this group. INTERPRETATION The results of this randomised trial establish the benefit of adding short-term ADT to PBRT to prevent progression in prostate cancer. To our knowledge, these are the first such findings to show that extending salvage radiotherapy to treat the pelvic lymph nodes when combined with short-term ADT results in meaningful reductions in progression after prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. FUNDING National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Pollack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Theodore G Karrison
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Leonard G Gomella
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel A Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Deborah W Bruner
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, and Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Wefel
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andre-Guy Martin
- CHU de Quebec-Université Laval (L'Hotel-Dieu de Quebec), Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Jeff M Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Steve J Angyalfi
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Himanshu Lukka
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - George B Rodrigues
- Department of Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Beauchemin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - R Jeffrey Lee
- Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Aaron M Allen
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Drew C Monitto
- Spartanburg Regional Medical Center, Spartanburg, SC, USA
| | | | - Oliver Sartor
- Department of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Felix Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wei J, Wu X, Li Y, Tao X, Wang B, Yin G. Identification of Potential Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15:4897-4905. [PMID: 35592542 PMCID: PMC9113455 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s355435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate cancer is a common malignancy in men. Radical prostatectomy is one of the primary treatment modalities for patients with prostate cancer. However, early identification of biochemical recurrence is a major challenge for post-radical prostatectomy surveillance. There is a lack of reliable predictors of biochemical recurrence. The purpose of this study was to explore potential biochemical recurrence indicators for prostate cancer. Materials and Methods We analyzed transcriptomic data of cases with biochemical recurrence in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Then, we performed integrative bioinformatics analyses to establish a biochemical recurrence predictor model of prostate cancer. Results There were 146 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between prostate cancer and normal prostate, including 12 upregulated and 134 downregulated genes. Comprehensive pathway enrichment analyses revealed that these DEGs were associated with multiple cellular metabolic pathways. Subsequently, according to the random assignment principle, 208 patients were assigned to the training cohort and 205 patients to the validation cohort. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that 7 genes were significantly associated with the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. A model consisting of 5 genes was constructed using LASSO regression and multivariate Cox regression to predict biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Expression of PAH and AOC1 decreased with an increasing incidence of prostate cancer, whereas expression of DDC, LINC01436 and ORM1 increased with increasing incidence of prostate cancer. Kaplan–Meier curves and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves indicated that the 5-gene model had reliable utility in identifying the risk of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Conclusion This study provides a model for predicting prostate cancer recurrence after surgery, which may be an optional indicator for postoperative follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingchao Wei
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaohang Wu
- Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuxiang Li
- Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaowu Tao
- Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bo Wang
- Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
| | - Guangming Yin
- Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Guangming Yin, Email
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Li J, Cai Z, Wei W, Wang X, Peng X. Establishment of Prognostic Nomograms for Early-Onset Prostate Cancer Patients: A SEER Database Analysis. J INVEST SURG 2022; 35:1581-1590. [PMID: 35414345 DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2022.2062495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Clinical prostate cancer (PCa) is rare in men aged <50 years (early-onset). A well-designed nomogram for prognosis prediction in patients with early-onset PCa has not been studied. Here, we tried to establish nomogram models of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with early-onset PCa. METHODS The clinical variables of patients diagnosed with early-onset PCa between 2004 and 2016 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly divided into training and validation groups at a ratio of 7:3. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to select prognostic factors associated with OS or CSS, followed by the construction and validation of nomograms. RESULTS We enrolled 8259 patients with early-onset PCa. New nomograms were established and showed good discriminative abilities. Finally, ROC curve analysis demonstrated that these nomograms were superior to the TNM stage and Gleason score in predicting both OS and CSS for patients with early-onset PCa. CONCLUSION This is the first study to establish nomograms with effective and high accuracy for prognosis in patients with early-onset PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingtao Li
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhen Cai
- Department of Operation Room, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xia Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xiulan Peng
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ruder S, Gao Y, Ding Y, Bu P, Miles B, De Marzo A, Wheeler T, McKenney JK, Auman H, Fazli L, Simko J, Coll AH, Troyer DA, Carroll PR, Gleave M, Platz E, Trock B, Han M, Sayeeduddin M, True LD, Rowley D, Lin DW, Nelson PS, Thompson IM, Feng Z, Wei W, Brooks JD, Ittmann M, Lee M, Ayala G. Development and validation of a quantitative reactive stroma biomarker (qRS) for prostate cancer prognosis. Hum Pathol 2022; 122:84-91. [PMID: 35176252 PMCID: PMC9832989 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
To develop and validate a new tissue-based biomarker that improves prediction of outcomes in localized prostate cancer by quantifying the host response to tumor. We use digital image analysis and machine learning to develop a biomarker of the prostate stroma called quantitative reactive stroma (qRS). qRS is a measure of percentage tumor area with a distinct, reactive stromal architecture. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to determine survival in a large retrospective cohort of radical prostatectomy samples. qRS was validated in two additional, distinct cohorts that include international cases and tissue from both radical prostatectomy and biopsy specimens. In the developmental cohort (Baylor College of Medicine, n = 482), patients whose tumor had qRS > 34% had increased risk of prostate cancer-specific death (HR 2.94; p = 0.039). This result was replicated in two validation cohorts, where patients with qRS > 34% had increased risk of prostate cancer-specific death (MEDVAMC; n = 332; HR 2.64; p = 0.02) and also biochemical recurrence (Canary; n = 988; HR 1.51; p = 0.001). By multivariate analysis, these associations were shown to hold independent predictive value when compared to currently used clinicopathologic factors including Gleason score and PSA. qRS is a new, validated biomarker that predicts prostate cancer death and biochemical recurrence across three distinct cohorts. It measures host-response rather than tumor-based characteristics, and provides information not represented by standard prognostic measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Ruder
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center Medical School. 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030. USA
| | - Yan Gao
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center Medical School. 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030. USA
| | - Yi Ding
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center Medical School. 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030. USA
| | - Ping Bu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center Medical School. 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030. USA
| | - Brian Miles
- Department of Urology, The Methodist Hospital. 6560 Fannin Street, Suite 2100. Houston, TX, 77030. USA
| | - Angelo De Marzo
- Departments of Pathology, Epidemiology and Urology, Johns Hopkins Hospital School of Medicine. 600 N. Wolfe Street/Carnegie 417, Baltimore, MD, 21287. USA
| | - Thomas Wheeler
- Department of Pathology & Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine - BCM 215. One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030. USA
| | - Jesse K. McKenney
- Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Mail Code L25, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195. USA
| | - Heidi Auman
- Canary Foundation, 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA, 94304. USA
| | - Ladan Fazli
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia. 2660 Oak St., Vancouver, BC, V6H 3Z6. Canada
| | - Jeff Simko
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco. 505 Parnassus Avenue, Suite M590, Box 0511, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0511. USA
| | - Antonio Hurtado Coll
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia. 2660 Oak St., Vancouver, BC, V6H 3Z6. Canada
| | - Dean A. Troyer
- Department of Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, PO Box 1980, Norfolk, VA, 23501-1980. USA
| | - Peter R. Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Avenue, Suite A-610. San Francisco, CA, 94143-0330. USA
| | - Martin Gleave
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia. 2660 Oak St., Vancouver, BC, V6H 3Z6. Canada
| | - Elizabeth Platz
- Departments of Pathology, Epidemiology and Urology, Johns Hopkins Hospital School of Medicine. 600 N. Wolfe Street/Carnegie 417, Baltimore, MD, 21287. USA
| | - Bruce Trock
- Departments of Pathology, Epidemiology and Urology, Johns Hopkins Hospital School of Medicine. 600 N. Wolfe Street/Carnegie 417, Baltimore, MD, 21287. USA
| | - Misop Han
- Departments of Pathology, Epidemiology and Urology, Johns Hopkins Hospital School of Medicine. 600 N. Wolfe Street/Carnegie 417, Baltimore, MD, 21287. USA
| | - Mohammad Sayeeduddin
- Department of Pathology & Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine - BCM 215. One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030. USA
| | - Lawrence D. True
- Department of Urology, University of Washington. Surgery Pavilion, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195. USA
| | - David Rowley
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, BCMA-514B, Houston, TX, 77030. USA
| | - Daniel W. Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Washington. Surgery Pavilion, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195. USA
| | - Peter S. Nelson
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 110 Fairview Ave. N., PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA, 98109-1024. USA
| | - Ian M. Thompson
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, Mail Code 7845, San Antonio, TX, 78229-3900. USA
| | - Ziding Feng
- Biostatistics Department - Unit 1411, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, P.O. Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402. USA
| | - Wei Wei
- Biostatistics Department - Unit 1411, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, P.O. Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402. USA
| | - James D. Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, 453 Quarry Road, Urology 5656, Palo Alto, CA, 94304. USA
| | - Michael Ittmann
- Department of Pathology & Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine - BCM 215. One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030. USA
| | - MinJae Lee
- Biostatistics/Epidemiology/Research Design (BERD) Core, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center Medical School, 6410 Fannin St, Houston, TX, 77030. USA
| | - Gustavo Ayala
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center Medical School. 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030. USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Risk subtyping and prognostic assessment of prostate cancer based on consensus genes. Commun Biol 2022; 5:233. [PMID: 35293897 PMCID: PMC8924191 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03164-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent malignancy in male urogenital system around worldwide. We performed molecular subtyping and prognostic assessment based on consensus genes in patients with PCa. Five cohorts containing 1,046 PCa patients with RNA expression profiles and recorded clinical follow-up information were included. Univariate, multivariate Cox regression analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression were used to select prognostic genes and establish the signature. Immunohistochemistry staining, cell proliferation, migration and invasion assays were used to assess the biological functions of key genes. Thirty-nine intersecting consensus prognostic genes from five independent cohorts were identified. Subsequently, an eleven-consensus-gene classifier was established. In addition, multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that the classifier served as an independent indicator of recurrence-free survival in three of the five cohorts. Combined receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis achieved synthesized effects by combining the classifier with clinicopathological features in four of five cohorts. SRD5A2 inhibits cell proliferation, while ITGA11 promotes cell migration and invasion, possibly through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. To conclude, we established and validated an eleven-consensus-gene classifier, which may add prognostic value to the currently available staging system. By analysis of gene expression profiles of prostate cancer patients from multiple platforms, an eleven-consensus-gene classifier is constructed to provide a robust tool for the prediction of recurrence-free survival.
Collapse
|
48
|
Baas DJH, Schilham M, Hermsen R, de Baaij JMS, Vrijhof HJEJ, Hoekstra RJ, Sedelaar JPM, Küsters-Vandevelde HVN, Gotthardt M, Wijers CHW, van Basten JP, Somford DM. Preoperative PSMA-PET/CT as a predictor of biochemical persistence and early recurrence following radical prostatectomy with lymph node dissection. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022; 25:65-70. [PMID: 34471231 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00452-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of lymph nodes (LN) suspicious for metastases on preoperative prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT for biochemical persistence (BCP) and early biochemical recurrence (BCR) following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic LN dissection (ePLND). METHODS We evaluated 213 patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent clinical staging with preoperative 68Ga- or 18F-PSMA-PET/CT scan and subsequent RARP with ePLND. Patients were grouped as PSMA- or PSMA+ depending on their LN status on PSMA-PET/CT and subdivided according to histological LN status in pN0 or pN1. Diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-PET/CT for the detection of pN1 was evaluated. BCP was defined as a first postoperative serum PSA level ≥0.1 ng/mL 6-12 weeks following RP. Early BCR was defined as detectable PSA > 0.2 ng/mL within 12 months of follow-up. Univariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the effect of PSMA+ on BCP and BCR. RESULTS Forty patients (19%) were PSMA+. The overall incidence of pN1 was 23%. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV on a per patient level for the detection of pN1 was 29%, 84%, 35%, and 80% respectively. BCP was observed in 26 of 211 patients (12%) and early BCR in 23 of 110 patients (21%). The presence of PSMA+ was a significant predictor for BCP (OR 7.1, 2.9-17.1 95% CI) and BCR (OR 8.1, 2.9-22.6 95% CI). CONCLUSION Preoperative PSMA-PET/CT may be a valuable tool for patient counseling for RARP and ePLND as it is a significant predictor for the risk of postoperative BCP and early BCR. We conclude that an ePLND should not be avoided in men with intermediate or high-risk PCa and preoperative negative PSMA-PET/CT, as 20% have microscopic LN metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J H Baas
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - M Schilham
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - R Hermsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J M S de Baaij
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - H J E J Vrijhof
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - R J Hoekstra
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - J P M Sedelaar
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - M Gotthardt
- Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - C H W Wijers
- CWZ Academy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J P van Basten
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - D M Somford
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Comparison of Different Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Postirradiation Recurrence in Prostate Carcinoma Patients. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:7943609. [PMID: 35178455 PMCID: PMC8844388 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7943609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
After primary treatment of localized prostate carcinoma (PC), up to a third of patients have disease recurrence. Different predictive models have already been used either for initial stratification of PC patients or to predict disease recurrence. Recently, artificial intelligence has been introduced in the diagnosis and management of PC with a potential to revolutionize this field. The aim of this study was to analyze machine learning (ML) classifiers in order to predict disease progression in the moment of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation during follow-up. The study cohort consisted of 109 PC patients treated with external beam radiotherapy alone or in combination with androgen deprivation therapy. We developed and evaluated the performance of two ML algorithms based on artificial neural networks (ANN) and naïve Bayes (NB). Of all patients, 72.5% was randomly selected for a training set while the remaining patients were used for testing of the models. The presence/absence of disease progression was defined as the output variable. The input variables for models were conducted from the univariate analysis preformed among two groups of patients in the training set. They included two pretreatment variables (UICC stage and Gleason's score risk group) and five posttreatment variables (nadir PSA, time to nadir PSA, PSA doubling time, PSA velocity, and PSA in the moment of disease reevaluation). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and predictive accuracy was calculated to test the models' performance. The results showed that specificity was similar for both models, while NB achieved better sensitivity then ANN (100.0% versus 94.4%). The ANN showed an accuracy of 93.3%, and the matching for NB model was 96.7%. In this study, ML classifiers have shown potential for application in routine clinical practice during follow-up when disease progression was suspected.
Collapse
|
50
|
So AI. Targeting the androgen receptor axis at the time of RP. Can Urol Assoc J 2022; 15:280. [PMID: 35099377 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alan I So
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|