Use of geriatric assessment for older adults in the oncology setting: a systematic review

Prognostic value of Geriatric-8 for adverse outcomes within 30 days of surgery in older adults with colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

It is unclear whether the Geriatric-8 (G8) has the accuracy to preselect patients for complete geriatric assessment, and has the ability to predict adverse outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We therefore aimed to determine whether the G8, or other variables present in the medical record, are applicable in predicting 30-day adverse outcomes in older patients undergoing surgery for CRC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study involving patients ≥70 years who had surgery for CRC between 2018 and 2020 in a general hospital in the Netherlands. The primary outcome was adverse outcome(s), which is a composite of surgical and non-surgical complications, readmission and mortality, all within 30 days of surgery. The secondary endpoints were the individual components, such as delirium, infection and ileus. We explored potential prognostic factors using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Data were collected from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (DRCA) and medical records.

RESULTS

The study included 200 patients (mean age 78.9 years: 50% female), with 36.5% having adverse outcomes in the first 30 days of surgery. In neither univariate nor multivariable analysis were G8 scores associated with adverse outcomes. Factors with higher odds of adverse outcomes were male gender, and having cognitive decline or previous delirium.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that G8 scores have no prognostic value for adverse outcomes, complications and mortality within 30 days of surgery among older adults with CRC. Therefore, the G8 should not be the tool for short-term risk prediction of adverse outcomes in these patients.

How representative are participants in geriatric oncology clinical trials? The case of the 5C RCT in geriatric oncology: A cross-sectional comparison to a geriatric oncology clinic

INTRODUCTION

Frail older adults make up a substantial portion of the older adult population. However, frail patients are often excluded from randomized controlled trials. This underrepresentation restricts the extent to which trial findings can be generalized to this population. We compared a sample from the Canadian 5C Randomized Controlled Trial investigating comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in the geriatric oncology setting in terms of frailty to patients referred to the Older Adults with Cancer Clinic (OACC) to determine if the trial sample was representative of the normal geriatric oncology practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Baseline CGA data of 5C Trial participants seen at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM), were compared to data from OACC patients that were seen during the duration of the 5C trial (between April 2018 and April 2020) and that satisfied the 5C inclusion criteria. To assess the frailty of samples, sex, age, disease site, comorbidity level, medical optimization, social supports, functional status, falls risk, nutrition, cognition, and mood were compared between 5C participants and OACC patients using Fisher's exact and independent samples t-test.

RESULTS

A sample of 115 5C participants and 205 OACC patients were included. The mean age of 5C participants and OACC patients was 75.4 and 81.6 years, respectively (p < 0.001). The distribution of disease sites was significantly different between the samples (p < 0.001) and OACC patients were also significantly more impaired compared to 5C participants in comorbidity (23.4% versus 10.4% high comorbidity) (p = 0.001), IADL dependence (55.1% versus 42.6%) (p = 0.036), impaired physical function (70.6% versus 31.3%) (p < 0.001), falls risk (67.8% versus 27%) (p < 0.001), impaired nutrition (55.6% versus 40.9%) (p = 0.014), and cognition (47.2% versus 10%) (p < 0.001). There were no differences in sex, medication optimization, poor social supports, and impaired mood between the samples.

DISCUSSION

The 5C sample was less frail and younger than patients seen in the geriatric oncology clinic. Finding strategies to address barriers to the inclusion of frailer older adults is important to increase their representation in future trials to allow findings to be generalized to this vulnerable population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov # NCT03154671.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts radiation-induced acute toxicity in prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present prospective study was to evaluate the significance of geriatric conditions measured by a comprehensive geriatric assessment (GA) for the prediction of the risk of high-grade acute radiation-induced toxicity.

METHODS

A total of 314 prostate cancer patients (age ≥ 65 years) undergoing definitive radiotherapy at a tertiary academic center were included. Prior to treatment, patients underwent a GA. High-grade toxicity was defined as acute toxicity grade ≥ 2 according to standard RTOG/EORTC criteria. To analyze the predictive value of the GA, univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients (12.7%) developed acute toxicity grade ≥ 2; high grade genitourinary was found in 37 patients (11.8%) and rectal toxicity in 8 patients (2.5%), respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed a significant association of comorbidities with overall toxicity grade ≥ 2 (odds ratio [OR] 2.633, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.260-5.502; p = 0.010) as well as with high-grade genitourinary and rectal toxicity (OR 2.169, 95%CI1.017-4.625; p = 0.045 and OR 7.220, 95%CI 1.227-42.473; p = 0.029, respectively). Furthermore, the Activities of Daily Living score (OR 0.054, 95%CI 0.004-0.651; p = 0.022), social status (OR 0.159, 95%CI 0.028-0.891; p = 0.036), and polypharmacy (OR 4.618, 95%CI 1.045-20.405; p = 0.044) were identified as independent predictors of rectal toxicity grade ≥ 2.

CONCLUSION

Geriatric conditions seem to be predictive of the development of high-grade radiation-induced toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy.

Prognostic impact of clinical factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor with or without chemotherapy in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50

Introduction

The proportion of older patients diagnosed with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been increasing. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy (MONO) and combination therapy of ICI and chemotherapy (COMBO) are standard treatments for patients with NSCLC and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion scores (TPS) ≥ 50%. However, evidence from the clinical trials specifically for older patients is limited. Thus, it is unclear which older patients benefit more from COMBO than MONO.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 199 older NSCLC patients of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% who were treated with MONO or COMBO. We analyzed the association between treatment outcomes and baseline patient characteristics in each group, using propensity score matching.

Results

Of the 199 patients, 131 received MONO, and 68 received COMBO. The median overall survival (OS; MONO: 25.2 vs. COMBO: 42.2 months, P = 0.116) and median progression-free survival (PFS; 10.9 vs. 11.8 months, P = 0.231) did not significantly differ between MONO and COMBO group. In the MONO group, OS was significantly shorter in patients without smoking history compared to those with smoking history [HR for smoking history against non-smoking history: 0.36 (95% CI: 0.16-0.78), P = 0.010]. In the COMBO group, OS was significantly shorter in patients with PS 1 than those with PS 0 [HR for PS 0 against PS 1: 3.84 (95% CI: 1.44-10.20), P = 0.007] and for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) compared to non-squamous cell carcinoma (non-SQ) [HR for SQ against non-SQ: 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.44), P < 0.001]. For patients with ECOG PS 0 (OS: 26.1 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0031, PFS: 6.5 vs. 21.7 months, P = 0.0436) or non-SQ (OS: 23.8 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0038, PFS: 10.9 vs. 17.3 months, P = 0.0383), PFS and OS were significantly longer in the COMBO group.

Conclusions

ECOG PS and histological type should be considered when choosing MONO or COMBO treatment in older patients with NSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%.

Survival outcomes of patients with stage III colorectal cancer aged ≥ 80 years who underwent curative resection: the HiSCO-04 prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years with stage III colorectal cancer remains unclear. In parallel with a multicenter prospective phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of uracil-tegafur and leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy (HiSCO-03), we conducted a prospective observational study of these patients to assess survival outcomes, including those ineligible for chemotherapy.

METHODS

This multi-institutional prospective cohort study included 17 institutions in Hiroshima, Japan. Patients aged ≥ 80 years with stage III colorectal cancer who underwent curative resection were enrolled. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival, and the secondary endpoints were 3-year overall and relapse-free survival. Propensity score matching was used to assess the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 214 patients were analyzed between 2013 and 2018, including 99 males and 115 females with a median age of 84 years (range 80-101 years). Recurrence occurred in 58 patients and secondary cancers were observed in 17. The 3-year disease-free, overall, and relapse-free survival rates were 63.3%, 76.9%, and 62.9%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 65 patients with a completion rate of 52%. In a study of 80 patients that adjusted for background factors using propensity score matching, patients who completed the planned treatment showed improved disease-free survival (3-year disease-free survival: completed, 80.0%; not received, 65.5%; and discontinued, 56.3%; p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Completion of adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer aged ≥ 80 years, although the number of patients who would benefit from it is limited.

Effectiveness of geriatric assessment and management in older cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Frailty and multimorbidity among older cancer patients affect treatment tolerance and efficacy. Comprehensive geriatric assessment and management is recommended to optimize cancer treatment, but its effect on various outcomes remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cost-effectiveness studies comparing comprehensive geriatric assessment (with or without implementation of recommendations) to usual care in older cancer patients.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane trials from inception to January 27, 2023, for RCTs and cost-effectiveness studies. Pooled estimates for outcomes were calculated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 19 full-text articles representing 17 RCTs were included. Average participant age was 72-80 years, and 31%-62% were female. Comprehensive geriatric assessment type, mode of delivery, and evaluated outcomes varied across studies. Meta-analysis revealed no difference in risk of mortality (risk ratio [RR] = 1.08. 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.91 to 1.29), hospitalization (RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.77 to 1.10), early treatment discontinuation (RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.19), initial dose reduction (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.26), and subsequent dose reduction (RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.70 to 1.09). However, the risk of treatment toxicity was statistically significantly lower in the comprehensive geriatric assessment group (RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.86). No cost-effectiveness studies were identified.

CONCLUSION

Compared with usual care, comprehensive geriatric assessment was not associated with a difference in risk of mortality, hospitalization, treatment discontinuation, and dose reduction but was associated with a lower risk of treatment toxicity indicating its potential to optimize cancer treatment in this population. Further research is needed to evaluate cost-effectiveness.

The effect of comprehensive geriatric assessment on care received, treatment completion, toxicity, cancer-related and geriatric assessment outcomes, and quality of life for older adults receiving systemic anti-cancer treatment: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review aims to summarise the available literature on the effect of geriatric assessment (multidimensional health assessment across medical, social, and functional domains; "GA") or comprehensive geriatric assessment (geriatric assessment with intervention or management recommendations; "CGA") compared to usual care for older adults with cancer on care received, treatment completion, adverse treatment effects, survival and health-related quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials or prospective cohort comparison studies on the effect of GA/CGA on care received, treatment, and cancer outcomes for older adults with cancer.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included: seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs), two phase II randomised pilot studies, and one prospective cohort comparison study. All studies included older adults receiving systemic therapy, mostly chemotherapy, for mixed cancer types (eight studies), colorectal cancer (one study), and non-small cell lung cancer (one study). Integrating GA/CGA into oncological care increased treatment completion (three of nine studies), reduced grade 3+ chemotherapy toxicity (two of five studies), and improved quality of life scores (four of five studies). No studies found significant differences in survival between GA/CGA and usual care. GA/CGA incorporated into care decisions prompted less intensive treatment and greater non-oncological interventions, including supportive care strategies.

DISCUSSION

GA/CGA integrated into the care of an older adult with cancer has the potential to optimise care decisions, which may lead to reduced treatment toxicity, increased treatment completion, and improved health-related quality of life scores.

Preoperative evaluation of the elderly patient

Nowadays, the pre-operative evaluation of older patients is a critical step in the decision-making process. Clinical assessment and care planning should be considered a whole process rather than separate issues. Clinicians should use validated tools for pre-operative risk assessment of older patients to minimize surgery-related morbidity and mortality and enhance care quality. Traditional pre-operative consultation often fails to capture the pathophysiological and functional profiles of older patients. The elderly's pre-operative evaluation should be focused on determining the patient's functional reserve and reducing any possible peri-operative risk. Therefore, older adults may benefit from the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) that allows clinicians to evaluate several aspects of elderly life, such as depression and cognitive disorders, social status, multi-morbidity, frailty, geriatric syndromes, nutritional status, and polypharmacy. Despite the recognized challenges in applying the CGA, it may provide a realistic risk assessment for post-operative complications and suggest a tailored peri-operative treatment plan for older adults, including pre-operative optimization strategies. The older adults' pre-operative examination should not be considered a mere stand-alone, that is, an independent stage of the surgical pathway, but rather a vital step toward a personalized therapeutic approach that may involve professionals from different clinical fields. The aim of this review is to revise the evidence from the literature and highlight the most important items to be implemented in the pre-operative evaluation process in order to identify better all elderly patients' needs.

Influence of age on pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites in older adults with cancer: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Capecitabine is an oral chemotherapy prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with unpredictable toxicity, especially in older adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of capecitabine and its metabolites in younger adults (< 70 years) and older adults (≥ 70 years) receiving capecitabine for solid cancer.

METHODS

Eligible participants receiving capecitabine had 2 venous samples collected on day 14 of cycle 1 and cycle 2 of their treatment. Capecitabine and metabolite concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. A Bayesian estimation approach was used to generate individual estimates of PK parameters for 5-FU. A linear mixed-effect analysis of variance (ANOVA) model was used to compare dose-normalised log-transformed PK parameters between age groups. Correlations were determined by linear regression and logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of the total 26 participants, 58% were male with a median age of 67 years (range, 37-85) with 54% aged < 70 years and 46% aged ≥ 70 years. Participants aged ≥ 70 years, compared to those aged < 70 years, had a greater 5-FU exposure based on area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 17% (90% CI 103-134%; 0.893 vs. 0.762 mg h/L) and 14% increase in maximal concentration, C_max (90% CI 82.1-159%; 0.343 vs. 0.300 mg/L). The 5-FU C_max was positively associated with time up and go (TUG) (Pearson's correlation 0.77, p = 0.01), but not other geriatric assessment domains or severe toxicity.

CONCLUSION

5-FU exposure was significantly increased in older adults compared to younger adults receiving equivalent doses of capecitabine, and is a possible cause for increased toxicity in older adults.

Implementation of clinical recommendations from the geriatric oncology clinic

INTRODUCTION

While evidence on the value of routine geriatric assessment (GA) in cancer care for older patients is growing, there is limited data on the geriatric oncology (GO) clinic's specific recommendations and how they are implemented. In this study, we aimed to assess and evaluate the implementation of recommendations from the GO clinic at Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada, within six months of the initial visit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 100 consecutive adults age 65+ visiting the GO clinic from 2018 to 2019. For each patient, we evaluated the number and type of recommendations from the GO clinic. Recommendations were grouped based on clinical judgement. Of the recorded recommendations, we measured the rate of implementation within six months of the initial visit including who implemented the recommendations and why recommendations were not implemented. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

One hundred patients visiting the GO clinic (mean age of 80.5 years, 62% male, 52% with planned curative intent, with the genitourinary site being most common) received a median of six recommendations (range of 2-12), regardless of sex, cancer stage, cancer site, and treatment intent. Medication optimization (27%), patient education (26%), and referral to allied health (14%) were the top recommendations from the GO clinic. At six-month follow-up, 83% of all recommendations were implemented, of which 94% were performed by the GO clinic team. Patient education was implemented at a 100% rate by the GO clinic at the time of initial assessment. GO follow-up visit and other diagnostic tests (hearing test, vision test) were the recommendations with the lowest implementation rates, at 51% and 31%, respectively. The most common reasons for recommendations not being implemented were patient transfer to palliative care/death and patient declining recommendations due to busy appointment schedules.

DISCUSSION

A median of six recommendations were made per patient. The vast majority of recommendations were implemented, predominantly by the GO team. Overall, the study helps evaluate recommendations provided to patients visiting GO clinics, identify potential gaps, and assist with resource planning for optimal cancer care for older adults.

Multidrug chemotherapy, whole-brain radiation and cytarabine therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma in elderly patients with dose modification based on geriatric assessment: study protocol for a phase II, multicentre, non-randomised study

INTRODUCTION

Multidrug chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab, high-dose methotrexate, procarbazine and vincristine (R-MPV) is a standard therapy for younger patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL); however, prospective data regarding its use in elderly patients are lacking. This multi-institutional, non-randomised, phase II trial will assess the efficacy and safety of R-MPV and high-dose cytarabine (HD-AraC) for geriatric patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Forty-five elderly patients will be included. If R-MPV does not achieve complete response, the patients will undergo reduced-dose, whole-brain radiotherapy comprising 23.4 Gy/13 fractions, followed by local boost radiotherapy comprising 21.6 Gy/12 fractions. After achieving complete response using R-MPV with or without radiotherapy, the patients will undergo two courses of HD-AraC. All patients will undergo baseline geriatric 8 (G8) assessment before HD-AraC and after three, five and seven R-MPV courses. Patients with screening scores of ≥14 points that decrease to <14 points during subsequent treatment, or those with screening scores <14 points that decrease from the baseline during subsequent treatment are considered unfit for R-MPV/HD-AraC. The primary endpoint is overall survival, and the secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, treatment failure-free survival and frequency of adverse events. The results will guide a later phase III trial and provide information about the utility of a geriatric assessment for defining chemotherapy ineligibility.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study complies with the latest Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent will be obtained. All participants can quit the study without penalty or impact on treatment. The protocol for the study, statistical analysis plan and informed consent form have been approved by the Certified Review Board at Hiroshima University (CRB6180006) (approval number: CRB2018-0011). The study is ongoing within nine tertiary and two secondary hospitals in Japan. The findings of this trial will be disseminated through national and international presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

jRCTs061180093.

Immunotherapy in the first-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of an International Experts Panel Meeting by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology (AIOT)

BACKGROUND

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the front-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is currently the standard of care. However, as clinical trials include a very limited number of elderly patients, evidence on the safety and efficacy of using ICI-based regimens is still limited.

METHODS

A virtual International Expert Panel took place in July 2022 to review the available evidence on the use of ICI-based regimens in the first-line setting in elderly patients with NSCLC and provide a position paper on the field both in clinical practice and in a research setting.

RESULTS

All panelists agreed that age per se is not a limitation for ICI treatments, as the elderly should be considered only as a surrogate for other clinical factors of frailty. Overall, ICI efficacy in the elderly population is supported by reviewed data. In addition, the panelists were confident that available data support the safety of single-agent immunotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC. Conversely, concerns were expressed on the safety of chemo + ICI-based combination, which were considered mainly related to the toxicities of chemotherapy components. Therefore, suggestions were proposed to tailor combined approaches in the elderly patients with NSCLC. The panelists defined high, medium, and low priorities in clinical research. High priority was attributed to implementing the real-world assessment of elderly patients treated with ICIs, who are mostly underrepresented in pivotal clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current evidence, the panelists outlined the significant limitations affecting the clinical practice in elderly patients affected by NSCLC, and reached common considerations on the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of ICI monotherapy and ICI combinations in the first-line setting.

A prospective feasibility study of uracil-tegafur and leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients aged ≥ 80 years after curative resection of colorectal cancer, the HiSCO-03 study

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on the safety and effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) aged ≥ 80 years. We conducted a prospective multi-institutional phase II study of uracil-tegafur and leucovorin (UFT/LV) as adjuvant chemotherapy in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage III CRC aged ≥ 80 years who underwent curative resection were enrolled. Eligible patients received UFT/LV therapy (UFT, 300 mg/m² per day as tegafur; LV, 75 mg/day on days 1-28, every 35 days for five courses). Primary endpoint was feasibility, and secondary endpoints were safety and relative dose intensity.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were enrolled between 2013 and 2021. Of the 69 patients, 65 were included in the analysis. There were 32 males and 33 females with a median age of 82 years (range 80-88 years). In the primary endpoint, administration completion rate was 67.3% (95% confidence interval 54.9-77.6%), and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was below the threshold of 60%. 21 patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (AEs) and refused treatment. The median relative dose intensities were 84% (range 4-100%) for UFT, and 100% (range 4-100%) for LV. Incidence of grade three or higher AEs were neutropenia (1.5%), aspartate transaminase elevation (3%), alanine transaminase elevation (1.5%), oral mucositis (3%), anemia (1.5%), and diarrhea (4.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The indications for adjuvant UFT/LV therapy for elderly CRC aged ≥ 80 years were considered limited. It is necessary to clarify the background of patients in whom drug administration is discontinued and investigate their impact on long-term prognosis.

Frailty and Cancer: Current Perspectives on Assessment and Monitoring

Frailty, an age-related condition of increased vulnerability to acute endogenous or exogenous stressors, is a key barrier to successful treatment of cancer in older people. In this group of patients, assessment of frailty is required before starting a new treatment. According to guidelines, the gold standard to assess frailty in older adults with cancer is geriatric screening followed by geriatric assessment (GA) across essential GA-domains (social status, physical function, nutrition, cognition, emotion, co-morbidity, polypharmacy). GA enables tailoring of both oncological therapy and non-oncological interventions to the patient's vulnerabilities. Large clinical trials recently have demonstrated that the feasibility and tolerability of systemic cancer treatment in older patients are significantly improved by such GA-guided management. Indications and optimal tools for frailty monitoring during the course of cancer treatment have not yet been defined in greater detail. New technologies such as wearable sensors or apps offer promising new opportunities to further develop frailty monitoring. This review describes the current standards and perspectives for the assessment and monitoring of frailty in elderly patients with cancer.

Premature aging as an accumulation of deficits in young adult survivors of pediatric cancer

BACKGROUND

We aimed to characterize premature aging as an accumulation of deficits in survivors of pediatric cancer compared with community controls and examine associations with host and treatment factors, neurocognition, and mortality.

METHODS

Pediatric cancer survivors (n = 4000, median age = 28.6, interquartile range [IQR] = 23-35 years; 20 years postdiagnosis: IQR = 15-27), and community participants without a history of cancer serving as controls (n = 638, median age = 32, IQR = 25-40 years) completed clinical assessments and questionnaires and were followed for mortality through April 30, 2020 (mean [SD] follow-up = 7.0 [3.4] years). A deficit accumulation index (DAI) score was calculated from 44 aging-related items including self-reported daily function, psychosocial symptoms, and health conditions. Items were weighted from 0 (absent) to 1 (present and/or most severe), summed and divided by the total yielding a ratio (higher = more deficits). Scores less than 0.20 are robust, and 0.06 is a clinically meaningful difference. Linear regression compared the DAI in survivors and controls with an age*survivor or control interaction. Logistic regression and Cox-proportional hazards estimated the risk of neurocognitive impairment and death. Models were minimally adjusted for age, sex, and race and ethnicity.

RESULTS

The adjusted mean DAI among survivors at age 30 years was 0.16 corresponding to age 63 years in controls (33 years premature aging; β = 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.06 to 0.08; P < .001). Cranial and abdominal radiation, alkylators, platinum, and neurosurgery were associated with worse DAI (P ≤ .001). Higher scores were associated with increased risk of neurocognitive impairment in all domains (P < .001) and increased risk of death (DAI = 0.20-0.35, hazard ratio = 2.80, 95% CI = 1.97 to 3.98; DAI ≥ 0.35, hazard ratio = 5.08, 95% CI = 3.52 to 7.34).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric cancer survivors experience clinically significant premature aging. The DAI may be used to identify survivors at greatest risk of poor health outcomes.

Impact of Geriatric Assessment and Management on Quality of Life, Unplanned Hospitalizations, Toxicity, and Survival for Older Adults With Cancer: The Randomized 5C Trial

PURPOSE

American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends that older adults with cancer being considered for chemotherapy receive geriatric assessment (GA) and management (GAM), but few randomized controlled trials have examined its impact on quality of life (QOL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The 5C study was a two-group parallel 1:1 single-blind multicenter randomized controlled trial of GAM for 6 months versus usual oncologic care. Eligible patients were age 70+ years, diagnosed with a solid tumor, lymphoma, or myeloma, referred for first-/second-line chemotherapy or immunotherapy or targeted therapy, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. The primary outcome QOL was measured with the global health scale of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL questionnaire and analyzed with a pattern mixture model using an intent-to-treat approach (at 6 and 12 months). Secondary outcomes included functional status, grade 3-5 treatment toxicity; health care use; satisfaction; cancer treatment plan modification; and overall survival.

RESULTS

From March 2018 to March 2020, 350 participants were enrolled. Mean age was 76 years and 40.3% were female. Fifty-four percent started treatment with palliative intent. Eighty-one (23.1%) patients died. GAM did not improve QOL (global QOL of 4.4 points [95% CI, 0.9 to 8.0] favoring the control arm). There was also no difference in survival, change in treatment plan, unplanned hospitalization/emergency department visits, and treatment toxicity between groups.

CONCLUSION

GAM did not improve QOL. Most intervention group participants received GA on or after treatment initiation per patient request. Considering recent completed trials, GA may have benefit if completed before treatment selection. The COVID-19 pandemic may have affected our QOL outcome and intervention delivery for some participants.

FOxTROT2: innovative trial design to evaluate the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treating locally advanced colon cancer in older adults or those with frailty

Treating older adults with cancer is increasingly important in modern oncology practice. However, we currently lack the high-quality evidence needed to guide optimal management of this heterogeneous group. Principally, historic under-recruitment of older adults to clinical trials limits our understanding of how existing evidence can be applied to this group. Such uncertainty is particularly prevalent in the management of colon cancer (CC). With CC being most common in older adults, many patients also suffer from frailty, which is recognised as being strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes. Conducting clinical trials in older adults presents several major challenges, many of which impact the clinical relevance of results to a real-world population. When considering this heterogeneous group, it may be difficult to define the target population, recruit participants effectively, choose an appropriate trial design, and ensure participants remain engaged with the trial during follow-up. Furthermore, after overcoming these challenges, clinical trials tend to enrol highly selected patient cohorts that comprise only the fittest older patients, which are not representative of the wider population. FOxTROT1 was the first phase III randomised controlled trial to illustrate the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the treatment of CC. Patients receiving NAC had greater 2-year disease-free survival compared to those proceeding straight to surgery. Outcomes for older adults in FOxTROT1 were similarly impressive when compared to their younger counterparts. Yet, this group inevitably represents a fitter subgroup of the older patient population. FOxTROT2 has been designed to investigate NAC in a full range of older adults with CC, including those with frailty. In this review, we describe the key challenges to conducting a robust clinical trial in this heterogeneous patient group, highlight our strategies for overcoming these challenges in FOxTROT2, and explain how we hope to provide clarity on the optimal treatment of CC in older adults.

A scoping review of ageism towards older adults in cancer care

INTRODUCTION

Ageism towards older adults with cancer may impact treatment decisions, healthcare interactions, and shape health/psychosocial outcomes. The purpose of this review is twofold: (1) To synthesize the literature on ageism towards older adults with cancer in oncology and (2) To identify interventions that address ageism in the healthcare context applicable to oncology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley and Levac methods and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We conducted an exhaustive multi-database search, screening 30,926 titles/abstracts. Following data abstraction, we conducted tabular, narrative, and textual synthesis.

RESULTS

We extracted data on 133 papers. Most (n = 44) were expert opinions, reviews, and letters to editors highlighting the negative impacts of ageism, expressing the need for approaches addressing heterogeneity of older adults, and calling for increased clinical trial inclusion for older adults. Qualitative studies (n = 3) described healthcare professionals' perceived influence of age on treatment recommendations, whereas quantitative studies (n = 32) were inconclusive as to whether age-related bias impacted treatment recommendations/outcomes or survival. Intervention studies (n = 54) targeted ageism in pre/post-licensure healthcare professionals and reported participants' improvement in knowledge and/or attitudes towards older adults. No interventions were found that had been implemented in oncology.

DISCUSSION

Concerns relating to ageism in cancer care are consistently described in the literature. Interventions exist to address ageism; however, none have been developed or tested in oncology settings. Addressing ageism in oncology will require integration of geriatric knowledge/interventions to address conscious and unconscious ageist attitudes impacting care and outcomes. Interventions hold promise if tailored for cancer care settings. 249/250.

Surgical Tolerability and Frailty in Elderly Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Narrative Review

Simple Summary

Life expectancy in Western countries and East Asian countries has incremented over the past decades, resulting in a rapidly aging world, while in general, radical prostatectomy (RP) is not recommended in elderly men aged ≥75 years. Together with the evolving technique of robotic surgeries, surgical indications for RP should be reconsidered in ‘elderly’ and ‘frail’ men, since this procedure has now become one of the safest and most effective cancer treatments for prostate cancer. One important element to determine surgical indications is surgical tolerability. However, evidence is scarce regarding the surgical tolerability in elderly men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). In this review, we focused on the surgical tolerability in ‘elderly’ and/or ‘frail’ men undergoing RARP, with the intent to provide up-to-date information on this matter and to support the decision making of therapeutic options in this spectrum of patients.

Abstract

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has now become the gold standard treatment for localized prostate cancer. There are multiple elements in decision making for the treatment of prostate cancer. One of the important elements is life expectancy, which the current guidelines recommend as an indicator for choosing treatment options. However, determination of life expectancy can be complicated and difficult in some cases. In addition, surgical tolerability is also an important issue. Since frailty may be a major concern, it may be logical to use geriatric assessment tools to discriminate ‘surgically fit’ patients from unfit patients. Landmark studies show two valid models such as the phenotype model and the cumulative deficit model that allow for the diagnosis of frailty. Many studies have also developed geriatric screening tools such as VES-13 and G8. These tools may have the potential to directly sort out unfit patients for surgery preoperatively.

Pembrolizumab monotherapy for untreated PD-L1-Positive non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly or those with poor performance status: A prospective observational study

Objectives

We investigated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) and elderly patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We also investigated clinical prognostic factors for the efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy, based on patient characteristics.

Materials and methods

In this prospective observational study, PS-2 and elderly NSCLC patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1% who received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy, from October 2019 to March 2021, at 10 institutions in Japan were enrolled. Patients judged eligible by their physicians for combined chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line treatment were excluded. Clinicopathological characteristics and adverse events were investigated for correlation with clinical outcomes.

Results

Forty patients were enrolled in the study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with PS 2 and those aged ≥ 75 years were 4.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9–14.4) months and 5.3 (95% CI 2.9–9.4) months, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) of patients with PS 2 and those aged ≥ 75 years were 11.6 (95% CI: 1.4–not evaluable [NE]) months and 11.6 (95% CI 7.4–18.1) months, respectively. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were observed in 19 patients; 6 patients had severe irAEs of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or higher. Patients who achieved stable disease or better, had a statistically significant increase in PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the acquisition of disease control with pembrolizumab monotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS.

Conclusion

Pembrolizumab monotherapy was relatively effective and tolerable as a first-line treatment for patients with PD-L1-positive advanced NSCLC who had poor PS or were elderly. Our results suggest that disease control might be an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS in this population. (UMIN000044052 https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050176)

Use of geriatric assessment in cancer clinical trials: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Older adults are underrepresented in cancer clinical trials despite accounting for most of the disease burden. Geriatric assessment (GA) could be used in clinical trials of cancer drugs for older adults to improve the clinical evidence for cancer drug use among older adults.

OBJECTIVE

To examine patterns of use of GA in cancer clinical trials.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic review of the studies reporting use of GA in a clinical trial setting for all cancer types and published between January 2010 and January 2020. Characteristics of GA use were extracted for each study, along with study phase, cancer type, and participant age (PROSPERO: CRD42020170584).

RESULTS

We identified 320 studies and 63 studies met the final inclusion criteria. Among 74 purposes of GA use, the most common was to examine the association between impairments in GA domains and clinical outcomes (28/74, 38%). Among 258 GA domains assessed across 63 studies, physical status (59/258, 23%) and comorbidities (50/258, 19%) were most often evaluated. There was significant heterogeneity in the instruments used to assess physical function (n = 16) and mood disorders (n = 7). Most studies were phase 2 (32/63, 51%).

CONCLUSIONS

GA is most often used in clinical trial settings to examine associations between GA-identified deficits and clinical outcomes. Significant heterogeneity exists in the GA instruments used across trials. Comprehensive and consistent incorporation of GA into future cancer clinical trial designs could help collect more older adult-specific clinical information and adjust trial eligibility criteria to increase representation by older adults.

Practical management of older adults with cancer: geriatric oncology in Japan

Japan has the highest proportion of older adults globally, and the average life expectancy of the Japanese population has increased in recent decades. Given that the incidence of cancer increases with age, it is a major health concern for older adults. However, geriatric oncology is a relatively new field and collaboration between oncologists and geriatricians in Japan is limited. Hence, oncologists and other healthcare professionals engaged in cancer care have not been able to adequately understand geriatric care, and information and experience are insufficient for this specific population. Thus, they may struggle with the assessment and management of older adults with cancer. Recently, several Japanese academic societies for cancer have developed practical guidelines and research policy with regard to geriatric research in older adults with cancer, in addition to organizing symposia and workshops focusing especially on geriatric oncology. Furthermore, because the Japan Geriatrics Society established a discipline committee on cancer, close collaboration between oncologists and geriatricians has grown steadily. Geriatric oncology is currently recognized as an important field of cancer care in Japan. The integration of oncology and geriatric care is anticipated in the near future. However, understanding the aspects of geriatric care and meanings of technical jargons used in geriatric oncology is difficult. Accordingly, this article provides an overview of the current knowledge and recent advancements in geriatric oncology. In addition, it outlines the current status and problems of geriatric oncology in Japan.

Exploring Cost-Effectiveness of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Geriatric Oncology: A Narrative Review

Simple Summary

The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment is a multidimensional and multidisciplinary evaluation designed for elderly patients with the goal of structuring tailored care and follow-up. Despite the known benefits of this approach, the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment is not universally applied to elderly cancer patients due to economic and practical barriers. This narrative review aims to investigate the cost-effectiveness of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment adopted in geriatric oncology. The results revealed a lack of research on the topic, but recurrent cost-saving effects of this approach in geriatric oncology settings were highlighted—suggesting a positive cost-effectiveness ratio. Further structured research with comprehensive economic evaluations is needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract

The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and the corresponding geriatric interventions are beneficial for community-dwelling older persons in terms of reduced mortality, disability, institutionalisation and healthcare utilisation. However, the value of CGA in the management of older cancer patients both in terms of clinical outcomes and in cost-effectiveness remains to be fully established, and CGA is still far from being routinely implemented in geriatric oncology. This narrative review aims to analyse the available evidence on the cost-effectiveness of CGA adopted in geriatric oncology, identify the relevant parameters used in the literature and provide recommendations for future research. The review was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane databases, covering published studies without selection by the publication year. The extracted data were categorised according to the study design, participants and measures of cost-effectiveness, and the results are summarised to state the levels of evidence. The review conforms to the SANRA guidelines for quality assessment. Twenty-nine studies out of the thirty-seven assessed for eligibility met the inclusion criteria. Although there is a large heterogeneity, the overall evidence is consistent with the measurable benefits of CGA in terms of reducing the in-hospital length of stay and treatment toxicity, leaning toward a positive cost-effectiveness of the interventions and supporting CGA implementation in geriatric oncology clinical practice. More research employing full economic evaluations is needed to confirm this evidence and should focus on CGA implications both from patient-centred and healthcare system perspectives.

Reliable Prediction of Post-Operative Complications' Rate Using the G8 Screening Tool: A Prospective Study on Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery for Kidney Cancer

In the last years the incidence of renal neoplasms has been steadily increasing, along with the average age of patients at the time of diagnosis. Surgical management for localized disease is becoming more challenging because of patients’ frailty. We conducted a multi-center prospective study to evaluate the role of the G8 as a screening tool in the assessment of intra and post-operative complications of elderly patients (≥70 y.o.) undergoing surgery for kidney cancer. A total of 162 patients were prospectively enrolled between January 2015 to January 2019 and divided into two study groups (frail vs. not-frail) according to their geriatric risk profile based on G8 score. Several factors (i.e., age, CCI, ASA score, preoperative anemia, RENAL score, surgical procedures, and techniques) were analyzed to identify whether any of them would configure as a statistically significant predictor of surgical complications. According to the G8 Score, 90 patients were included in the frail group. A total of 52 frail patients vs. 4 non-frail patients developed a postoperative complication of any kind (p < 0.001). Of these, 11 were major complications and all occurred in the frail group. Our results suggest that the G8 screening tool is an effective and useful instrument to predict the risk of overall complications in elderly patients prior to renal surgery.

How-to guide for medication reviews in older adults with cancer: A Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology and Nursing & Allied Health Interest Group initiative

For patients with polypharmacy or potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use identified on geriatric assessment, a medication review is recommended. The medication review aims to ensure that the potential benefits of medication outweigh any potential harms and ensures the patient is receiving medication to effectively treat their medical conditions while minimizing risk of toxicity. The medication review encompasses: (1) collecting information to identify medication indications, efficacy and side effects, (2) evaluating adherence, (3) identifying PIMs, (4) identifying drug interactions, and (5) deprescribing. This paper provides the "how-to" guide to conduct a high-quality medication review by the cancer care multidisciplinary team.

Age-related health deficits and five-year mortality among older, long-term cancer survivors

INTRODUCTION

Geriatric assessment evaluates multiple domains of health that, together, are superior to using chronologic age for predicting outcomes, such as hospitalization and mortality among patients with cancer. Most studies have not included comparison groups of individuals without cancer and assessed domains around the time of initial cancer diagnosis. Further, the potential for brief, self-reported measures to capture deficits that similarly predict mortality has not been well examined. This study compared age-related health deficit prevalence between older, long-term cancer survivors and individuals without a cancer history, and estimated associations between deficits and mortality risk among survivors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analyses included participants in the Cancer Prevention Study (CPS)-II Nutrition Cohort who were cancer-free at enrollment in 1992/1993 and completed the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) global health questionnaire in 2011. Age-related deficits in five domains (comorbidities, functional status, mental health, malnutrition/weight loss, and social support) were self-reported. Cancer information was self-reported and confirmed via medical records or state cancer registries. Vital status through 2016 and cause of death was ascertained by linkage with the National Death Index.

RESULTS

Analyses included 9979 participants (median age = 80) diagnosed with invasive cancer 5-20 years prior to completing the 2011 survey and 63,578 participants without a cancer history (median age = 79). Overall deficits in the five domains were similar among long-term cancer survivors and controls. However, survivors of specific cancer types - non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), lung, and kidney cancer - were more likely to report deficits in mental health and functional status than the control group. Among all survivors, each domain was independently associated with all-cause mortality, particularly functional status (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.80-2.27) and mental health (HR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.65-2.04). Mortality risk increased with the number of deficits.

DISCUSSION

These results suggest that, several years after treatment, NHL, lung, and kidney cancer survivors are still more likely to experience age-related deficits compared to other similarly-aged individuals. Furthermore, results show that shorter, self-reported physical and mental health assessments, such as the PROMIS® global health questions, are predictive of mortality among older, long-term cancer survivors and, therefore, may be useful in clinical and research settings.

The Prognostic Value of Eight Comorbidity Indices in Older Patients with Cancer: The ELCAPA Cohort Study

Background: A prognostic assessment is crucial for making cancer treatment decisions in older patients. We assessed the prognostic performance (relative to one-year mortality) of eight comorbidity indices in a cohort of older patients with cancer. Methods: We studied patients with cancer aged ≥70 included in the Elderly Cancer Patient (ELCAPA) cohort between 2007 and 2010. We assessed seven nonspecific indices (Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), three modified versions of the CCI, the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, the Gagne index, and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G)) and the National Cancer Institute Comorbidity Index. Results: Overall, 510 patients were included. Among patients with nonmetastatic cancer, all the comorbidity indices were independently associated with 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of 1.44 to 2.51 for one standard deviation increment; p < 0.05 for all) and had very good discriminant ability (Harrell’s C > 0.8 for the eight indices), but were poorly calibrated. Among patients with metastatic cancer, only the CIRS-G was independently associated with 1-year mortality (aHR (95% confidence interval): 1.26 [1.06−1.50]). Discriminant ability was moderate (0.61 to 0.70) for the subsets of patients with metastatic cancer and colorectal cancer. Conclusion: Comorbidity indices had strong prognostic value and discriminative ability for one-year mortality in older patients with nonmetastatic cancer, although calibration was poor. In older patients with metastatic cancer, only the CIRS-G was predictive of one-year mortality.

Unmet needs in the management of unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a review after the 'Radio Talk' webinars

INTRODUCTION

Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a variable entity, encompassing bulky primary tumors, nodal involvement or both. Multidisciplinary evaluation is essential to discuss multiple treatment options, to outline optimal management and to examine the main debated topics and critical issues not addressed by current trials and guidelines that influence daily clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

From March to May 2021, 5 meetings were scheduled in a webinar format titled 'Radio Talk' due to the COVID-19 pandemic; the faculty was composed of 6 radiation oncologists from 6 different Institutions of Italy, all of them were the referring radiation oncologist for lung cancer treatment at their respective departments and were or had been members of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) Thoracic Oncology Study Group. The topics covered included: pulmonary toxicity, cardiac toxicity, radiotherapy dose, fractionation and volumes, unfit/elderly patients, multidisciplinary management.

EXPERT OPINION

The debate was focused on the unmet needs triggered by case reports, personal experiences and questions; the answers were often not univocal, however, the exchange of opinion and the contribution of different centers confirmed the role of multidisciplinary management and the necessity that the most critical issues should be investigated in clinical trials.

Exploring Determinants of Interdisciplinary Collaboration within a Geriatric Oncology Setting: A Mixed-Method Study

Simple Summary

Collaboration between oncologists and geriatricians has been shown to improve the quality of elderly cancer patient care. However, previous research has revealed how interpersonal factors might hinder this interdisciplinary work. This study aims to assess sprocessual and contextual determinants of the collaboration between these two disciplines, including shared time and routines, medical decision criteria and perceptions of age and needs of elderly patients. These aspects are important to develop a more efficient patient-centered approach in oncogeriatric care and improve collaboration between the different disciplines involved.

Abstract

Therapeutic challenges regarding the population of elderly cancer patients and their heterogeneity lead to the need to implement person-centered approaches in order to optimize care strategies and adapt oncology treatments to each pattern of aging. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology recommends a multidisciplinary evaluation of these patients and the use of screening tools prior to the initiation of treatments. However, previous research shows a poor implementation of these recommendations in geriatric oncology. Although some studies have identified how different perceptions of geriatric oncology might hinder routine teamwork, little is known about the impact of other factors on promoting the collaboration between the two specialties. This mixed-method exploratory study used an online questionnaire to assess the perception of a group of 22 geriatricians and oncology physicians on different determinants of oncology care and teamwork. In this sample, older oncology patients benefited from geriatric care. However, there was a variability regarding age criteria and a limited use of screening tools. The multidimensional framework for interprofessional teamwork by Reeves has been used to analyze some of the determinants of the collaboration between oncology physicians and geriatricians. This study has identified systematic issues to consider when promoting communication and common values between the two disciplines, including available resources in terms of shared time, space and routine actions.

Short- and long-term predictive power of the preoperative Geriatric Assessment components in older cancer patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery

INTRODUCTION

The pathological stage of the cancer and presence of postoperative complications are the most important predictors of survival in older oncologic patients. Therefore, determining biological age, and risks connected with it, should be the key factor in the preoperative assessment. It may be accomplished by using a Geriatric Assessment (GA). However, it is not established which components are most useful for predicting short- and long-term postoperative outcomes in cancer patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 334 consecutive cancer patients aged ≥70 years underwent elective abdominal surgery and were followed-up prospectively for 12 months. The preoperative GA consisted of eight domains: functional, physical activity, comorbidity, polypharmacotherapy, nutritional, cognition, mood, and social support. Logistic regression analyses were used to analyse the predictive ability.

RESULTS

All components of GA were independent risk factors of 30-day major morbidity apart from ADL, BOMC, Polypharmacy (OR 0.6-1.3; p < 0.001). However, ADL, TUG, the polypharmacy and the MOS-SSS turned out to be significant predictors of 30-day mortality (OR 0.72-1.46; p < 0.001). In turn, only ADL, CDT and MOS-SSS were valid predictors of 12-months mortality (OR 0.46-0.85; p < 0.001). Frailty (surrogate of the biological age), not the chronological age, were also independent predictors of all outcomes (OR 4.71-8.56 p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Not the chronological age but components of GA and frailty are significant predictors of both 30-day postoperative outcome and 12-months mortality in older cancer patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery.

Comparison of preoperative assessment tools in older patients undergoing cancer surgery: A prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Surgery in older adults with cancer is complex due to multiple age related confounding factors. There are many scoring systems available for preoperative risk stratifications of older patients. Currently very few prospective studies comparing the various commonly used scales are available. This is the first study which compares the established preoperative risk assessment tools of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale (ECOG) and American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Scale (ASA) with frailty scores of Modified Frailty Index (MFI) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a prospective observational study of older patients with cancer who underwent oncosurgery in a tertiary cancer centre during the one-year study period. Patients were scored on the CFS, MFI, ASA and ECOG scales. All patients were followed up for 30 days immediately following surgery and their post operative complications were documented. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done and a p value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 820 patients studied, 15.6% had prolonged hospital stay, 9.1% had 30-day morbidity, 0.7% had readmission, and mortality was 1.1%. High-risk scores on the ASA and CFS were significantly associated with prolonged postoperative stay, readmission, morbidity, and mortality (p < 0.05). High-risk scores on the ECOG was significantly associated with prolonged hospital stay (p = 0.027), 30-day morbidity (p = 0.003), and mortality (p = 0.001), but not with readmission. There was no significant association between MFI score and the postoperative variables studied (p > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, morbidity was significantly associated only with male gender (p = 0.015), higher cancer stage (p = 0.005), higher ASA score (p = 0.029), and prolonged hospital stay (p = 0.001). Mortality was significantly associated only with emergency surgery (p = 0.012) and prolonged hospital stay (p = 0.004), and prolonged hospital stay was significantly associated with advanced cancer stage (p = 0.001) and emergency surgery (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In older patients undergoing cancer surgery, ASA and CFS are predictors of prolonged postoperative stay, morbidity, mortality, and readmission. A high-risk ECOG score is predictive of prolonged post operative stay, 30-day morbidity, and mortality, but not of readmission. Score on MFI is not a predictor of postoperative outcomes. Newer predictive tools which include cancer- specific factors are required for better management of these patients.

Quality of care of consultations from the geriatric oncology clinic: "Are we addressing the needs of patients?"

INTRODUCTION

A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is recommended for older adults with cancer in the pre-treatment setting to optimize care. A CGA systematically evaluates multiple domains to develop a holistic view of the patient's health and facilitate timely interventions to ameliorate patient outcomes. For a CGA to be most effective, optimization of each abnormal domain should occur. However, there is limited literature exploring this issue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consultations of patients seen in a Geriatric Oncology clinic from June 2015 to June 2018 were reviewed. The percentage of "no recommendations made" in the consultation letter following the identification of impairment in each of eight geriatric domains was calculated. Trends over time were examined by stratifying the data into three periods ("Year 1", "Year 2", and "Year 3") and conducting a logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 365 consultation notes were reviewed. The patients were predominately older (mean age 79.9 years), male (66.9%), with genitourinary (38.6%) or gastrointestinal (23.3%) cancers. The most common stage was metastatic (40.6%). The most common treatment intent and modality were palliative (50.4%) and hormonal (50.9%), respectively. The geriatric domains that had the greatest frequency of impairments were medication optimization (76.2%), functional status (68.8%), and falls risk (64.9%). The domains that had the highest frequency of "no recommendations made" following identification of impairment were nutrition (39.8%), social support (39.5%), and mood (26.4%). The prevalence of "no recommendations made" decreased over time in social support (54.6% in Year 1 to 27.8% in Year 3, p = 0.043) and possibly nutrition (53.1% in Year 1 to 34.3% in Year 3, p = 0.088) but not for mood (p = 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Nutrition, social supports and mood were the CGA domains with the highest proportion of "no recommendations made" following an identification of impairment. This is the first quality assurance study to identify social supports, mood, and nutrition domains as less frequently addressed following an identification of an impairment amongst older patients with cancer. Subsequent prospective research is required to understand reasons for these observations and identification of barriers to address these geriatric domains amongst older adults with cancer.

Benefits, Challenges, and Opportunities of Integrating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Geriatric Oncology to Advance Patient Screening for Functional Fitness for Treatment

OBJECTIVES

To discuss potential benefits, challenges, and opportunities of integrating patient-reported outcome measures in geriatric oncology, with the goal being to advance patient screening for 'functional fitness for treatment.'

DATA SOURCES

This is narrative review of the relevant literature using PubMed.

CONCLUSION

Patient screening in geriatric cancer care can be driven by patient self-reports. Most of the research on patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care to date has involved, in different proportions and to different extents, older patients with cancer (≥70 years of age). However, reports specifically targeting implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in geriatric cancer care are surprisingly fewer. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology Priorities Initiative calls for more research into the use of patient-reported outcome measures for older adults with cancer. More feasibility studies will be required to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures as fit-for-purpose, reporting frequency, patient burden, integration and display of patient-reported information, and workflow impact. Developing, adapting, and validating patient-reported outcome measures for use in geriatric oncology will be key to ensure adequacy of measurement. Groundwork involving consultation of all potential end users of patient-reported information is paramount because there is no one size fits all. When the ground is ready for implementation adequate preparation, training, resources, and ongoing support will be needed.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Working within the multidisciplinary team, nurses can promote patient screening that is led by the patient. Nursing roles can be developed, supported, expanded, or repurposed to involve greater use of patient-reported outcome measures for several key patient outcomes in geriatric cancer care.

Exploring the relationships between income and emotional/practical concerns and help-seeking by older adult cancer survivors: A secondary analysis

PURPOSE

The number of older cancer survivors is growing rapidly and expected to double through the next decade. Survivors can face challenges from treatment as well as other co-morbid conditions which may influence quality of living and generate distress. Understanding more about factors influencing whether older cancer survivors receive the help they desire is important for cancer program planning. The purpose of this analysis was to understand relationships between income and emotional/practical concerns, help-seeking experiences and unmet needs of adults 65+ years one to three years following cancer treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey was conducted with randomly selected Canadian cancer survivors about their survivorship care. Drawing from these publicly available data, this secondary analysis examines prevalence of concerns, help-seeking, receipt of help, reasons for not seeking help, responses to information questions, and overall unmet needs for trends across income groups.

RESULTS

7975 respondents 65+ years responded, of which the 5891 (73.9%) indicating annual household income were analyzed. Over 80% responded to questions regarding emotional/practical concerns following treatment with the largest proportions reporting emotional concerns for anxiety/fear of cancer returning (63%) and depression (49%), and practical concerns regarding transportation for appointments (33%) and paying healthcare bills (31%). Individuals with household incomes <$25,000 reported higher levels of concern than other income groups and higher proportions sought assistance for their concerns. Across income levels, 20% reported difficulty finding assistance to address their concerns.

DISCUSSION

Older cancer survivors across all income categories reported emotional/practical concerns, lack of information about these issues, and unmet needs regarding both emotional and practical concerns. Many encountered challenges obtaining help with those in lower income categories more severely affected despite Canada's universal health care system. Financial burden ought to be assessed with older survivors on an on-going basis to ensure relevant intervention.

Geriatric assessment with management for older patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy. Protocol of a Norwegian cluster-randomised controlled pilot study

About 50% of patients with cancer are expected to need radiotherapy (RT), and the majority of these are older. To improve outcomes for older patients with cancer, geriatric assessment (GA) with management (GAM) is highly recommended. Evidence for its benefits is still scarce, in particular for patients receiving RT. We report the protocol of a cluster-randomised pilot study designed to test the effect, feasibility and health economic impact of a GAM intervention for patients ≥65 years, referred for palliative or curative RT. The randomising units are municipalities and city districts. The intervention is municipality-based and carried out in collaboration between hospital and municipal health services from the start of RT to eight weeks after the end of RT. Its main constituents are an initial GA followed by measures adapted to individual patients' impairments and needs, systematic symptom assessments and regular follow-up by municipal cancer nurses, appointed to coordinate the patient's care. Follow-up includes at least one weekly phone call, and a house call four weeks after the end of RT. All patients receive an individually adapted physical exercise program and nutritional counselling. Detailed guidelines for management of patients' impairments are provided. Patients allocated to the intervention group will be compared to controls receiving standard care. The primary outcome is physical function assessed by the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30. Secondary outcomes are global quality of life, objectively tested physical performance and use of health care services. Economic evaluation will be based on a comparison of costs and effects (measured by the main outcome measures). Feasibility will be assessed with mixed methodology, based on log notes and questionnaires filled in by the municipal nurses and interviews with patients and nurses. The study is carried out at two Norwegian RT centres. It was opened in May 2019. Follow-up will proceed until June 2022. Statistical analyses will start by the end of 2021. We expect the trial to provide important new knowledge about the effect, feasibility and costs of a GAM intervention for older patients receiving RT. Trial registration: ClinTrials.gov, ID NCT03881137, initial release 13th of March 2019.

DASC-21: a novel geriatric assessment for discriminating best supportive care in older patients with inoperable advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether the Dementia Assessment Sheet for the Community-based Integrated Care System is useful for decision-making or problem detection in the treatment and care of older patients with inoperable advanced non-small cell lung cancer compared with the current standard model using performance status.

METHODS

This study retrospectively examined 1595 cases admitted to the Department of Respiratory Medicine at the Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital between 26 July 2016 and 28 January 2020. Among these, 29 and 31 patients who received pharmacotherapies and best supportive care were extracted, respectively. The performance in identifying best supportive care using the Dementia Assessment Sheet for the Community-based Integrated Care System was evaluated in comparison with performance status. The ability to detect impairments in each Dementia Assessment Sheet for the Community-based Integrated Care System domain was also assessed.

RESULTS

The Dementia Assessment Sheet for the Community-based Integrated Care System total score had an area under the curve of 0.831 (95% confidence interval, 0.694-0.914), which was statistically equivalent to performance status. The discriminatory cut-off value for identification of best supportive care was set at 29 with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.742 and 0.897, respectively. Dementia Assessment Sheet for the Community-based Integrated Care System total score showed good concordance with performance status especially when reported by family members or caregivers. Deficits other than activities of daily living were recognized (2.8-19.4%) in patients with good performance status. Impairments were more frequently detected when reported by family members or caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS

The Dementia Assessment Sheet for the Community-based Integrated Care System discriminates the best supportive care for older patients with inoperable advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Moreover, it can identify vulnerabilities especially when reported by family members or caregivers that cannot be detected by performance status.

Evolving Therapeutic Approaches for Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in 2021

Simple Summary

The better understanding of disease biology, the availability of new effective drugs and the increased awareness of patients’ heterogeneity in terms of fitness and personal expectations has made the current treatment paradigm of AML in the elderly very challenging. Here, we discuss the evolving criteria used to define eligibility for induction chemotherapy and transplantation, the introduction of new agents in the treatment of patients with very different clinical conditions, the implications of precision medicine and the importance of quality of life and supportive care, proposing a simplified algorithm that we follow in 2021.

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients is characterized by unfavorable prognosis due to adverse disease features and a high rate of treatment-related complications. Classical therapeutic options range from intensive chemotherapy in fit patients, potentially followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), to hypomethylating agents or palliative care alone for unfit/frail ones. In the era of precision medicine, the treatment paradigm of AML is rapidly changing. On the one hand, a plethora of new targeted drugs with good tolerability profiles are becoming available, offering the possibility to achieve a prolonged remission to many patients not otherwise eligible for more intensive therapies. On the other hand, better tools to assess patients’ fitness and improvements in the selection and management of those undergoing allo-HCT will hopefully reduce treatment-related mortality and complications. Importantly, a detailed genetic characterization of AML has become of paramount importance to choose the best therapeutic option in both intensively treated and unfit patients. Finally, improving supportive care and quality of life is of major importance in this age group, especially for the minority of patients that are still candidates for palliative care because of very poor clinical conditions or unwillingness to receive active treatments. In the present review, we discuss the evolving approaches in the treatment of older AML patients, which is becoming increasingly challenging following the advent of new effective drugs for a very heterogeneous and complex population.

Functional status in older patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Functional Status (FS) is an important domain in Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and is most often evaluated using the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scales separately.

METHOD AND OBJECTIVES

This secondary analysis of a previous prospective cohort study was conducted between September 2015 and May 2018 at Marseille University Hospital, France, on 613 cancer outpatients aged ≥70 years. The first objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of FS impairment in older outpatients with cancer using a combination of the information collected with the ADL and short IADL scales. Our second objective was to describe the potential impact of this combined FS on three-month unplanned hospitalizations and three-month mortality in this population.

RESULTS

The median age was 81 years and 61.2% were men. The most common types of tumours were lung and thoracic (22.3%). Concerning FS, 255 patients (41.6%) had unimpaired ADL-IADL, 131 patients (21.4%) had IADL impairment, 38 patients (6.2%) had ADL impairment, and 189 patients (30.8%) had impaired ADL-IADL. In the multivariate Cox analysis, metastatic stage (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) = 1.79; 95% CI [1.14-2.80]) and impaired ADL-IADL (aHR = 3.46; 95% CI [1.89-6.33]) were independently associated with three-month mortality. In the logistic regression model, impaired ADL-IADL (adjusted Odd ratio (aOR) = 3.64; 95% CI [1.84-7.20]) was the only factor independently associated with three-month unplanned hospitalizations.

INTERPRETATION

The combined use of the ADL and IADL scales to evaluate functional status in older patients with cancer is of significant prognostic value regarding the risks of three-month unplanned hospitalizations and mortality.

Patient assessment and feasibility of treatment in older patients with cancer: results from the IN-GHO® Registry

PURPOSE

Predicting feasibility of treatment in older patients with cancer is a major clinical task. The Initiative Geriatrische Hämatologie und Onkologie (IN-GHO^®) registry prospectively collected data on the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), physician's and patient's-self assessment of fitness for treatment, and the course of treatment in patients within a treatment decision aged ≥ 70 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The registry included 3169 patients from 93 centres and evaluated clinical course and treatment outcomes 2-3 and 6 months after initial assessment. Fitness for treatment was classified as fit, compromised and frail according to results of a CGA, and in addition by an experienced physician's and by patient's itself. Feasibility of treatment (termed IN-GHO^®-FIT) was defined as a composite endpoint, including willingness to undergo the same treatment again in retrospect, no modification or unplanned termination of treatment, and no early mortality (within 90 days).

RESULTS

CGA classified 30.0% as fit, 35.8% as compromised, and 34.2% as frail. Physician's and patient's-self assessment classified 61.8%/52.3% as fit, 34.2%/42.4% as compromised, and 3.9%/5.3%, as frail, respectively. Survival status at day 180 was available in 2072 patients, of which 625 (30.2%) had died. After 2-3 months, feasibility of treatment could be assessed in 1984 patients. 62.8% fulfilled IN-GHO®-FIT criteria. Multivariable analysis identified physician's assessment as the single most important item regarding feasibility of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Geriatricians were involved in 2% of patients only. Classification of fitness for treatment by CGA, and physician's or patient's-self assessment showed marked discrepancies. For the prediction of feasibility of treatment no single item was superior to physician's assessment. However CGA was not performed by trained geriatricians.

High World Heath Organization Performance Status Is Associated With Short- and Long-term Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

The value of performance status is widely used in medical oncology, but the association with surgical outcomes in colorectal cancer has not been described.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between World Heath Organization performance status and 90-day mortality, 30-day mortality, complications, and overall survival after elective colorectal cancer surgery.

DESIGN

The study was conducted as a nationwide population-based cohort study with prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Data from 2014 through 2016 were provided by the Danish nationwide colorectal cancer database (Danish Colorectal Cancer Group).

PATIENTS

All patients aged ≥18, who had elective surgery for colorectal cancer were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Multiple logistic regressions were performed to investigate 90-day mortality, 30-day mortality, and complications. One-year mortality was determined by Cox regression, and overall survival was illustrated by Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

A total of 10,279 patients had elective colorectal cancer surgery during the study period (6892 colonic and 3387 rectal). Thirty-four percent of the patients with colorectal cancer had a World Heath Organization performance status ≥1. The odds ratios of postoperative 90-day mortality in colon cancer for performance status 1, 2, and 3/4 compared with performance status 0 were 2.50 (95% CI, 1.67-3.73), 5.00 (95% CI, 3.19-7.86), and 17.34 (95% CI, 10.18-29.55). The odds ratios of postoperative 90-day mortality in rectal cancer for performance status 1, 2, and 3/4 were 3.90 (95% CI, 2.23-6.85), 9.25 (95% CI, 4.75-18.02), and 10.56 (95% CI, 4.07-27.41). Performance status was also associated with 30-day mortality, overall survival, and medical complications.

LIMITATIONS

Only 1 year of follow-up was possible for all patients, and cancer-specific survival was not available.

CONCLUSION

One of three patients has a performance status >0 and is associated with an increased risk of death, complications, and overall survival for both colonic and rectal cancers. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B540.

EL ALTO NIVEL DE DESEMPEO DE LA ORGANIZACIN MUNDIAL DE LA SALUD SE ASOCIA CON RESULTADOS A CORTO Y LARGO PLAZO DESPUS DE LA CIRUGA DEL CNCER COLORRECTAL UN ESTUDIO POBLACIONAL A NIVEL NACIONAL

ANTECEDENTES:El valor del estado funcional se usa ampliamente en oncología médica, pero no se ha descrito la asociación con los resultados quirúrgicos en el cáncer colorrectal.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue investigar la asociación entre el estado funcional de la Organización Mundial de la Salud y la mortalidad a 90 días, la mortalidad a 30 días, las complicaciones y la supervivencia general después de la cirugía electiva del cáncer colorrectal.DISEÑO:El estudio se realizó como un estudio de cohorte poblacional a nivel nacional con datos recolectados prospectivamente.ENTORNO CLINICO:Los datos fueron proporcionados por la base de datos de cáncer colorrectal a nivel nacional danés (DCCG.dk) en un período de estudio de 2014-2016.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron todos los pacientes de ≥18 años que se sometieron a cirugía electiva por cáncer colorrectal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Para investigar la mortalidad a los 90 días, la mortalidad a los 30 días y las complicaciones se realizaron regresiones logísticas múltiples. La mortalidad a un año se determinó mediante regresión de Cox y la supervivencia general se ilustra mediante curvas de Kaplan-Meier.RESULTADOS:Un total de 10 279 pacientes se sometieron a cirugía electiva de cáncer colorrectal en el período de estudio (6892 colónico y 3387 rectal). Treinta y cuatro por ciento de los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal tenían un estado funcional de la Organización Mundial de la Salud ≥1. Los ratios de probabilidades (odds ratios) de mortalidad postoperatoria a los 90 días en cáncer de colon para el estado funcional 1, 2 y 3/4 en comparación con el estado funcional 0 fueron 2,50 (IC del 95%: 1,67-3,73), 5,00 (IC del 95%: 3,19-7,86) y 17,34 (IC del 95%: 10,18-29,55), respectivamente. Los ratios de probabilidades de mortalidad postoperatoria de 90 días en cáncer de recto para el estado funcional 1, 2 y 3/4 fueron 3,90 (IC del 95%: 2,23-6,85), 9,25 (IC del 95%: 4,75-18,02) y 10,56 (IC del 95%: 2,23-6,85) % CI: 4,07-27,41). El estado funcional también se asoció con la mortalidad a los 30 días, la supervivencia general y las complicaciones médicas.LIMITACIONES:Solo fue posible un año de seguimiento para todos los pacientes y la supervivencia específica del cáncer no estaba disponible.CONCLUSIÓN:Uno de cada tres pacientes tiene un estado funcional> 0 y se asocia con un mayor riesgo de muerte, complicaciones y supervivencia general para los cánceres de colon y recto. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B540.

Living with cancer and multimorbidity: A qualitative study of self-management experiences of older adults with cancer

PURPOSE

Older adults are most commonly diagnosed with cancer but needs related to managing multiple chronic conditions (multimorbidity) are often overlooked. Although self-management is a growing imperative in cancer care, the experiences of older adults managing multimorbidity alongside a cancer diagnosis have been less explored. In this study we interviewed older adults with cancer and multimorbidity to understand their experiences with cancer self-management while living with multimorbidity.

METHODS AND SAMPLE

We used a descriptive qualitative approach and interviewed older adults (n = 14) about their experiences and had them complete the Multimorbidity Treatment Questionnaire; qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We identified three themes, including: Situating cancer and aging: personal, illness, and caregiving experiences; enacting and engaging in self-management; and challenges of living with cancer and navigating multimorbidity. Older adults demonstrated many strengths in engaging in self-management work but faced many challenges as they navigated the siloed healthcare system.

CONCLUSION

Oncology nurses play a critical role in supporting self-management for older adults with cancer. We propose that more in-depth research is needed to explore older adults' experiences with cancer self-management to ensure that they are able to engage in the self-management that is required in our healthcare system.