Synchronous Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas: Evidence of Clonality

Prognostic performance of FIGO 2023 endometrial carcinoma staging: a comparison to FIGO 2009 staging in the setting of known and unknown molecular classification

AIMS

The 2023 FIGO staging criteria for endometrial cancer (EC) introduced marked changes from the 2009 version. The full implication of these changes for patient diagnosis and treatment is unknown. We evaluate the differences in staging and prognostication between the two systems, with and without inclusion of molecular classification.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We assigned (1) FIGO 2009, (2) 2023 molecular-agnostic and (3) 2023 molecular-informed stages to 404 fully staged and molecularly classified patients with EC. Disease-specific and progression/relapse-free survival were analysed via the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank testing; 118 of 252 (47%) FIGO 2009 stage I patients were upstaged based on histopathological findings alone. Stage I/II subgroup survival distribution analysis showed a worse prognosis in FIGO 2023 IIB and IIC patients. In the molecular-informed FIGO 2023 system, three of 15 (20%) POLE-mutated stage I/II cases were downstaged from FIGO 2009 and eight (53%) were downstaged from molecular-agnostic FIGO 2023. Fifty-one of 60 (85%) p53-abnormal tumours were upstaged from the FIGO 2009, whereas 13 of 60 (22%) were upstaged from the 2023 molecular-agnostic stage. Molecular classification improved prognostic stratification for both 2009 and 2023 FIGO systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Downstaging based on POLE mutation more accurately represents patient outcomes. However, in the absence of known POLE status, applying molecular-agnostic FIGO 2023 criteria for stage I/II disease should be conducted with caution. For aggressive histotypes, additionally reporting FIGO 2009 stage should be considered. Upstaging based on substantial lymphovascular space invasion, aggressive histotype with any myometrial invasion and abnormal p53 improves prognostic discernment. Further subdivisions within stage I/II provide minimal additional prognostic information.

New clinicopathological concept of endometrial carcinoma with integration of histological features and molecular profiles

The dual-stratified pathway of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) has long been dominant. However, in 2013, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) defined four EC subgroups with distinctive prognoses. Inspired by TCGA, in 2018, the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) provided four pragmatic molecular classifiers to apply surrogate immunohistochemical markers to TCGA subgroup categorization. These trends prompted the revision of 2020 WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumors, 5th edition (2020 WHO classification), in which four molecular subtypes are recognized: POLE-ultramutated; mismatch repair-deficient; p53-mutant; and no specific molecular profile. In the 2020 WHO classification, the diagnostic algorithm is characterized by prioritizing POLEmut over other molecular abnormalities. Following the 2020 WHO classification, Federation of International Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) proposed a new staging system in 2023. The updated system focuses on diagnostic parameters, such as histological type and grade, lymphovascular space invasion, and molecular alterations. These new histomolecular diagnostic concepts of ECs are being accordingly introduced into the routine pathology practice. For the first time, the 2020 WHO classification includes mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) as a novel histological entity, mimicking the conventional mesonephric adenocarcinoma, but is considered of Müllerian ductal origin.

Prognostic performance of the 2023 FIGO staging schema for endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic performance of the 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) endometrial cancer staging schema.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study queried the Commission-on-Cancer's National Cancer Database. Study population was 129,146 patients with stage I-IV endometrial cancer per the 2009 FIGO staging schema. Stage-shifting and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to the 2023 FIGO staging schema.

RESULTS

Upstage (IA → II, 21.4 %; IB → II, 53.0 %) and downstage (IIIA→IA3, 22.2 %) occurred in both early and advanced diseases. Inter-stage prognostic performance improved in the 2023 schema with widened 5-year OS rate difference between the earliest and highest stages (68.2 % to 76.9 %). Stage IA1-IIB and IIC had distinct 5-year OS rate differences (85.8-96.1 % vs 75.4 %). The 5-year OS rate of the 2009 stage IIIA disease was 63.9 %; this was greater segregated in the 2023 schema: 88.0 %, 62.4 %, and 55.7 % for IIIA→IA3, IIIA1, and IIIA2, respectively (inter-substage rate-difference, 32.3 %). This 5-year OS rate of stage IA3 disease was comparable to the 2023 stage IB-IIB diseases (88.0 % vs 85.8-89.5 %). In the 2023 stage IIIC schema (micrometastasis rates: 29.6 % in IIIC1 and 15.6 % in IIIC2), micrometastasis and macrometastasis had the distinct 3-year OS rates in both pelvic (IIIC1-i vs IIIC1-ii, 84.9 % vs 71.1 %; rate-difference 13.8 %) and para-aortic (IIIC2-i vs IIIC2-ii, 82.9 % vs 65.2 %; rate-difference 17.7 %) nodal metastasis cases. The 5-year OS rate of the 2009 stage IVB disease was 23.4 %; this was segregated to 25.4 % for stage IVB and 19.2 % for stage IVC in the 2023 staging schema (rate-difference, 6.2 %).

CONCLUSION

The 2023 FIGO endometrial cancer staging schema is a major revision from the 2009 FIGO schema. Almost doubled enriched sub-stages based on detailed anatomical metastatic site and incorporation of histological information enable more robust prognostication.

Synchronous Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas: Pathologic and Molecular Analysis Highlights the Monoclonal Origin of the Lesions

The diagnosis of synchronous carcinomas, involving both the endometrium and ovaries, is not a rare finding in gynecologic pathology and represents a challenge with implications on tumor staging and therapeutic decision-making. A mono-institutional series of 11 metastatic and 6 paired synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas were reviewed by 2 expert pathologists based on previously published histopathologic criteria. The series was investigated for DNA mismatch repair proteins, p53, and POLE status and was subject to DNA-based next-generation sequencing targeting 67 cancer-related genes. Out of 17 pairs, 16 featured the same histotype (10 endometrioid, 4 serous high-grade, and 2 clear cells). By using WHO 2020 criteria, 11 couples of tumors were confirmed as metastatic and 6 couples were confirmed as independent. Based on next-generation sequencing analysis, 16 of 17 cases (11 metastatic and 5 independent) of our series showed evidence of a clonal relationship between endometrial and ovarian carcinomas. In metastatic cases, the adverse outcome was associated with nonendometrioid/high-grade endometrioid histotype and with the p53-abnormal molecular subtype. Four cases originally fulfilling clinicopathological criteria of independent endometrial and ovarian carcinomas were clonally related, low-grade endometrioid histotype and POLE -mut, mismatch repair deficient, and no specific molecular profile molecular subtypes; no adverse event was recorded in this group. In summary, the molecular characterization of synchronous gynecologic carcinomas confirms their clonal origin in most cases. However, the results of our study point out that the clinical behavior of these tumors seems to be determined by the presence of high-risk WHO 2020 histologic criteria and molecular features (i.e. p53-abnormal), rather than the monoclonal origin.

Radical total pelvic exenteration with concomitant right nephrectomy in the management of recurrent endometrioid ovarian adenocarcinoma: A case report and literature review

Endometrioid ovarian adenocarcinoma is a common subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer that can arise on a background of endometriosis. Maximal cytoreductive effort with an aim to remove all macroscopic disease (achieve R0) is the single independent prognostic factor for survival. Complex multidisciplinary surgeries may be required in order to achieve this.

Gastric-type glandular lesions of the female genital tract excluding the cervix: emerging pathological entities

In the last two decades or so, a spectrum of benign, premalignant and malignant cervical glandular lesions exhibiting gastric differentiation has been described, with gastric-type adenocarcinoma representing the most common human papillomavirus (HPV)-independent cervical adenocarcinoma. More recently, limited literature has reported a variety of gastric-type glandular lesions at other sites within the female genital tract and, as in the cervix (the most common site for these lesions), a spectrum of benign, premalignant and malignant lesions has been proposed. We provide an update and review of the emerging spectrum of gastric-type glandular lesions at female genital tract sites other than the cervix. In the endometrium, putative gastric-type glandular lesions include mucinous metaplasia of gastric-type, atypical mucinous proliferation of gastric-type and gastric-type adenocarcinoma. Similarly in the vagina, gastric-type adenosis, atypical adenosis and adenocarcinoma have been described. There have also been occasional reports of gastric-type lesions involving the ovary and fallopian tube. We provide guidance on how to recognise gastric-type lesions morphologically and immunophenotypically and stress that sometimes these lesions occur at more than one site within the female genital tract (synchronous/multifocal gastric-type lesions of the female genital tract), sometimes in association with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.

Synchronous Endometrial and Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma With MUTYH Germline Mutation: A Case Report With Genetic Analysis

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian endometrioid carcinoma, which simultaneously involves the endometrium and ovary, is a relatively rare entity among gynecological cancers. Precise diagnosis and risk stratification are crucial for disease management. We present a unique case of a 40-year-old woman diagnosed with synchronous endometrial and ovarian endometrioid carcinoma carrying a monoallelic pathogenic MUTYH germline variant. Despite the histological morphology of the right ovarian tumor exhibiting some differences compared to the uterine tumor, we identified three identical somatic mutations shared between the uterine tumor and right ovarian tumor, along with four additional mutations exclusive to the uterine tumor, through the utilization of massively parallel sequencing of a 196-gene panel. These findings enabled us to elucidate the clonal relatedness and potential clonal evolution of the tumor across the two anatomical sites. Furthermore, in accordance with the 2023 FIGO staging system, the patient was diagnosed with Stage IIIB2 uterine cancer, and consequently, adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy were administered after surgery. She is being followed periodically and is normal 15 months after surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this study presents the first case of a patient with synchronous endometrial and ovarian endometrioid carcinoma harboring a monoallelic pathogenic MUTYH germline variant.

Molecular Pathology of Ovarian Epithelial Neoplasms: Predictive, Prognostic, and Emerging Biomarkers

This review focuses on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive molecular biomarkers in ovarian epithelial neoplasms in the context of their morphologic classifications. Currently, most clinically actionable molecular findings are reported in high-grade serous carcinomas; however, the data on less common tumor types are rapidly accelerating. Overall, the advances in genomic knowledge over the last decade highlight the significance of integrating molecular findings with morphology in ovarian epithelial tumors for a wide-range of clinical applications, from assistance in diagnosis to predicting response to therapy.

Molecular and pathologic data to guide selection of patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer for ovarian preservation

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association of molecular and pathologic factors with concurrent or recurrent ovarian disease to guide ovarian preservation in endometrioid endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Patients with endometrial cancer ≤50 years of age at diagnosis were grouped by elective oophorectomy versus ovarian preservation at staging (January 2010 to June 2021). Tumors were stratified by molecular sub-type and CTNNB1 mutational status with next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Germline data identified patients with Lynch syndrome. Associations between molecular/pathologic features and concurrent ovarian disease in patients electing oophorectomy were compared with the Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact tests. Associations with isolated ovarian recurrences in patients who chose ovarian preservation were examined using survival analyses.

RESULTS

Among 317 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent bilateral oophorectomy, 27 (9%) had malignant ovarian tumors, of whom 11 (41%) had no gross ovarian involvement on intra-operative survey. For patients with sequencing, concurrent malignant ovarian tumors were diagnosed in 0/14 (0%) POLE, 2/48 (4%) copy number-low/no specific molecular profile, 10/22 (45%) microsatellite instability-high, and 3/6 (50%) copy number-high/TP53abnormal patients (p<0.001). Concurrent malignant ovarian tumors were present in 1/30 (3%) hotspot CTNNB1-mutated versus 10/60 (17%) wildtype/CTNNB1 non-hotspot mutated endometrial cancer patients (p=0.11) and 7/28 (25%) Lynch versus 7/74 (9%) non-Lynch syndrome patients (p=0.06). Concurrent malignant ovarian tumors were present in patients with higher grade endometrial cancer (5% grade 1 vs 20% grade 2 and 24% grade 3; p<0.001), present versus absent lymphovascular space invasion (20% vs 6%; p=0.004), positive versus negative pelvic washings (28% vs 7%; p=0.016), and ≥50% versus <50% myoinvasion (24% vs 7%; p=0.004). Of 103 patients who chose ovarian preservation, four had isolated ovarian recurrences (two had high-risk pathologic features and two had high-risk molecular features).

CONCLUSIONS

The integration of molecular and pathologic data may improve risk stratification of pre-menopausal patients with endometrial cancer and enhance candidate selection for ovarian preservation.

2023 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: The evolution of the revolution

INTRODUCTION

Embracing the complex and diverse nature of the heterogenous group of malignancies that are included under the umbrella of "endometrial cancer" (EC) to better align prognosis with treatment recommendations, requires a more comprehensive staging system. Our goal at the development of the new FIGO staging was to provide 1) high accuracy in the predictive prognosis for a patient with EC, which is the genuine purpose of a staging system, and 2) identification of distinct treatment relevant subgroups. Since the publication of the 2009 staging system by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 14  years ago (1, 2), our understanding of the biology and natural history of EC has undergone a radical transformation. The TGCA results in 2013 (3), and the many validation reports published since then (4-9), have taught us that "EC" is composed of at least four distinct molecularly defined diseases. Strong histopathologic markers reflecting tumor biology such as lymph vascular space invasion (LVSI) were identified. Importantly, anatomical borders were shown to lose their prognostic relevance for EC patients in the presence of dominant tumor biology-markers such as molecular subtypes/LVSI (10, 11). This emphasizes the integration of these novel markers into a prognostic staging system that aims to be relevant to patients. The 2023 FIGO staging system for EC harmonizes and integrates old and new knowledge on anatomic, histopathologic, and molecular features (12). It requires a change in our perception of a staging system, from a traditional purely anatomical borders-based system to an integrated staging system integrating anatomical borders and tumor biology as pivotal prognostic factors for EC patients while providing important information for treatment decision making. Therefore, the 2023 FIGO staging system demonstrates the logical next step in the evolution of the revolution in a patient-centric staging approach. Below, we elucidate the rationale for the FIGO 2023 endometrial cancer staging system.

Perceptions of Controversies and Unresolved Issues in the 2014 FIGO Staging System for Endometrial Cancer: Survey Results From Members of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists and International Gynecologic Cancer Society

Long-standing controversial and unresolved issues in the current "International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics" staging system for endometrial cancer are well-recognized by pathologists and clinicians alike and exist primarily as a result of limitations to the existing literature. To guide the design of future outcome-based studies specifically aimed at resolving such gaps, the International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists developed a survey of the current perceptions of pathologists (n = 172) and clinicians (n= 135) from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists and from the International Gynecologic Cancer Society on areas for potential refinement of the current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system. The highest priority issues for pathologists and clinicians alike were the need to determine whether stage IIIA patients (ovarian/fallopian tube involvement) can be reliably separated into favorable versus unfavorable outcome groups to avoid over-treatment of the former group and to determine whether stage IIIC patients (lymph node metastases) can be separated into favorable versus unfavorable outcome groups based on the size of lymph node metastases. The majority of pathologists and clinicians viewed lymphovascular space invasion as an independent prognostic variable and favored incorporating lymphovascular space invasion into staging, though the level of support did not meet the threshold of 75% in support that we used to define a formal consensus. While pathologists did agree on the prognostic value of reporting the extent of lymphovascular space invasion, there was no consensus on the diagnostic criteria to distinguish focal versus substantial involvement. The majority of pathologists and clinicians viewed that a universally accepted protocol for sentinel lymph node ultra-staging is lacking. Both survey groups conveyed a slight preference for incorporating tumor histotype and molecular classification into staging but the support was short of the 75% threshold for formal consensus. Collectively, this survey permits the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists to develop a pathologist and clinician-driven long-term strategy for prioritizing and designing outcome-based studies specifically targeted to resolving controversial and unresolved issues in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging of endometrial cancer.

Low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer with adnexal only metastasis: Evaluation of de-escalation of adjuvant therapy

OBJECTIVE

To assess survival outcomes of stage IA3 endometrial cancer and the association of adjuvant therapy and survival.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was retrospectively queried to examine 594 and 1455 patients with stage IA3 and IIIA1 endometrial cancer, respectively, from 2010-2015. Overall survival (OS) was examined based on adjuvant therapy: multimodal combination chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy, chemotherapy alone, external beam radiotherapy alone, and none.

RESULTS

For stage IA3 disease, 109 (18.4%) patients did not receive adjuvant therapy. The 5-year OS rates for the no adjuvant therapy group and the combination group were 86.3% and 91.4%, respectively (adjusted-hazard ratio [aHR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-2.18). This survival association was consistent when compared to chemotherapy alone (5-year OS rates 86.3% vs 86.3%, aHR 1.11, 95%CI 0.67-1.83). The results were similar among those who underwent nodal evaluation (5-year OS rates, 92.6%, 86.6%, and 89.4% for combination therapy, chemotherapy alone, and no adjuvant therapy), including grade 1 lesions (96.2%, 89.4%, and 100%, respectively). In grade 2 lesions, 5-year OR rates was modestly lower for no adjuvant therapy than combination therapy (89.4%, 84.0%, and 82.7% for combination, chemotherapy alone, and no adjuvant therapy, P = 0.03). For stage IIIA1 disease, omission of adjuvant therapy was associated with decreased OS compared to combination therapy (43.2% vs 73.1%, aHR 1.65, 95%CI 1.30-2.11) or chemotherapy alone (43.2% vs 67.1%, aHR 1.62, 95%CI 1.32-1.99).

CONCLUSION

The results of this investigation suggest that survival effects of adjuvant therapy differ for stage IA3 and IIIA1 diseases. Patients with stage IA3 disease have overall good prognosis regardless of adjuvant therapy particularly grade 1 lesions, partly supporting the FIGO committee suggestion for adjuvant therapy de-escalation in stage IA3 endometrial cancer.

Comprehensive molecular assessment of mismatch repair deficiency in Lynch associated ovarian cancers using next generation sequencing panel

OBJECTIVES

Abnormalities in mismatch repair have been described in ovarian cancer, but few studies have examined the causes of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). To address this, we completed targeted mutational and methylation sequencing on MMRd ovarian cancer cases. The objective of this study was to explore the molecular mechanism of MMRd using our targeted next generation sequencing panel.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed non-serous/mucinous ovarian cancers (n=215) were prospectively recruited from three cancer centers in Ontario, Canada, between 2015 and 2018. Tumors were reflexively assessed for mismatch repair protein by immunohistochemistry. Matched tumor-normal MMRd cases were analyzed on a custom next generation sequencing panel to identify germline and somatic mutations, copy number variants, rearrangements, and promoter methylation in mismatch repair and associated genes.

RESULTS

Of 215 cases, 28 (13%) were MMRd. The MMRd cohort had a median age of 52.3 years (range 33.6-62.2), with mostly stage I (50%) and grade 1 or 2 endometrioid histotype (57%). Of the 28 cases, 22 were available for molecular analysis, and Lynch syndrome was detected in 50% of MMRd cases (11/22; seven ovarian cancer and four synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancer: seven MSH6, two MLH1, one PMS2, and one MSH2). An explanation for the observed mismatch repair phenotype was available for 22/22 deficient cases, including 12 MLH1/PMS2 deficient (nine somatic methylation, one bi-allelic somatic deletion, and two pathogenic germline variant), one PMS2 deficient (one pathogenic germline variant), seven MSH6 deficient (seven pathogenic germline variant), and two MSH2/MSH6 deficient (one pathogenic germline variant and one bi-allelic somatic mutation). Concordance between clinical germline testing and panel sequencing results was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of our custom next generation sequencing panel allowed for the streamlined assessment of hereditary and somatic causes of MMRd in ovarian cancers.

FIGO 2023 endometrial cancer staging: too much, too soon?

An updated International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for endometrial carcinoma was introduced in June 2023. The new system represents a significant departure from traditional endometrial and other gynecological carcinoma staging systems which are agnostic of parameters such as tumor type, tumor grade, lymphovascular space invasion, and molecular alterations. The updated system, which incorporates all of these 'non-anatomical' parameters, is an attempt to make staging more personalized and relevant to patient prognostication and management, and to align with the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology (ESGO/ESTRO/ESP) risk stratification. Herein, we present a critical review of the new staging system and discuss its advantages and disadvantages. The authors propose that the new FIGO staging system should be first appraised at a multi-institutional and global level with the input of all relevant societies (gynecology, pathology, gynecologic oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology) to understand the impact, scope, and supporting evidence of the proposed changes. Such a process is fundamental to produce a robust system that pathologists and treating clinicians can adopt.

Dedifferentiated and Undifferentiated Ovarian Carcinoma: An Aggressive and Molecularly Distinct Ovarian Tumor Characterized by Frequent SWI/SNF Complex Inactivation

Dedifferentiated and undifferentiated ovarian carcinomas (DDOC/UDOC) are rare neoplasms defined by the presence of an undifferentiated carcinoma. In this study, we detailed the clinical, pathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of a series of DDOC/UDOC. We collected a multi-institutional cohort of 23 DDOC/UDOC and performed immunohistochemistry for core switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) complex proteins (ARID1A, ARID1B, SMARCA4, and SMARCB1), mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, and p53. Array-based genome-wide DNA methylation and copy number variation analyses were performed on a subset of cases with comparison made to a previously reported cohort of undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (UDEC), small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT), and tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). The age of all 23 patients with DDOC/UDOC ranged between 22 and 71 years (with an average age of 50 years), and a majority of them presented with extraovarian disease (16/23). Clinical follow-up was available for 19 patients. Except for 2 patients, the remaining 17 patients died from disease, with rapid disease progression resulting in mortality within a year in stage II-IV settings (median disease-specific survival of 3 months). Eighteen of 22 cases with interpretable immunohistochemistry results showed loss of expression of core SWI/SNF protein(s) that are expected to result in SWI/SNF complex inactivation as 10 exhibited coloss of ARID1A and ARID1B, 7 loss of SMARCA4, and 1 loss of SMARCB1. Six of 23 cases were MMR-deficient. Two of 20 cases exhibited mutation-type p53 immunoreactivity. Methylation profiles showed coclustering of DDOC/UDOC with UDEC, which collectively were distinct from SCCOHT and HGSC. However, DDOC/UDOC showed an intermediate degree of copy number variation, which was slightly greater, compared with SCCOHT but much less compared with HGSC. Overall, DDOC/UDOC, like its endometrial counterpart, is highly aggressive and is characterized by frequent inactivation of core SWI/SNF complex proteins and MMR deficiency. Its molecular profile overlaps with UDEC while being distinct from SCCOHT and HGSC.

Pattern A endocervical adenocarcinomas with ovarian metastasis are indolent and molecularly distinct from destructively invasive adenocarcinomas

AIMS

The invasive pattern in HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma (HPVA) has prognostic value. Non-destructive (pattern A) HPVA has excellent prognosis mirroring adenocarcinoma in-situ (AIS). However, the rare occurrence of ovarian spread in these tumours suggests aggressiveness in a subset of patients with these otherwise indolent lesions. We hypothesise that AIS/pattern A HPVA with ovarian metastases are biologically different than metastatic destructively invasive HPVA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Samples from patients with HPVA and synchronous or metachronous metastases were retrieved and reviewed to confirm diagnosis and determine the Silva pattern in the primary lesion. For each case, normal tissue, cervical tumour and at least one metastasis underwent comprehensive sequencing using a 447-gene panel. Pathogenic single-nucleotide variants and segmental copy-number alterations (CNA), tumour mutational burden and molecular signatures were evaluated and compared between primary and metastases and among invasive pattern categories. We identified 13 patients: four had AIS/pattern A primaries, while nine had pattern B/C tumours. All AIS/pattern A lesions had metastasis only to ovary; 50% of patients with ovarian involvement, regardless of invasive pattern, also had involvement of the endometrium and/or fallopian tube mucosa by HPVA. In the ovary, AIS/pattern A HPVA showed deceptive well-differentiated glands, often with adenofibroma-like appearance. Conversely, pattern C HPVAs consistently showed overt infiltrative features in the ovary. Sequencing confirmed the genetic relationship between primary and metastatic tumours in each case. PIK3CA alterations were identified in three of four AIS/pattern A HPVAs and three of eight pattern B/C tumours with sequenced metastases. Pattern C tumours showed a notably higher number of CNA in primary tumours compared to pattern A/B tumours. Only one metastatic AIS/pattern A HPVA had a novel pathogenic variant compared to the primary. Conversely, five of eight pattern B/C tumours with sequenced metastases developed novel pathogenic variants in the metastasis not seen in the primary. All four AIS/pattern A patients were alive and free of disease at 31, 47, 58 and 212 months after initial diagnosis. Conversely, cancer-related death was documented in five of nine pattern B/C patients with follow-up at 7, 20, 20, 43 and 87 months.

CONCLUSION

Morphologically and genomically, AIS/pattern A HPVA with secondary ovarian involvement appears distinct from destructively invasive tumours. In at least a subset of these cases, ovarian spread appears to occur via trans-Mullerian superficial extension, different from the stromal and lymphatic vascular spread typical of more aggressive tumours (pattern C). These differences may explain the indolent outcome observed in the rare subset of patients with AIS/pattern A HPVA and ovarian metastasis. Our data underscore the potential for conservative surgical management approaches to pattern A HPVA.

Practical Updates and Diagnostic Challenges in Endometrial Carcinoma

CONTEXT.—

Clinical management of endometrial carcinoma largely depends on the morphologic parameters ascertained based on the pathologic evaluation of surgical resection specimens. However, there are numerous controversial and nonstandardized aspects of both the macroscopic and microscopic assessment of surgical specimens, including grossing, adequate sampling, diagnosis, staging, reporting, and ancillary testing.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide a comprehensive practical review of standardized grossing, key morphologic findings for reporting and staging, and diagnostic and prognostic use of ancillary testing in endometrial carcinomas.

DATA SOURCES.—

The existing literature, recommendations of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists, and specialty consensus guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This review article summarizes important aspects of the grossing and sampling of surgical resection specimens for microscopic examination, key morphologic parameters that are required for reporting and staging, and morphologic features and immunoprofiles helpful in the differential diagnosis of low-grade and high-grade endometrial carcinomas, as well as the current status of the molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in serous carcinoma. The information presented herein can be helpful in overcoming diagnostic challenges and issues related to the pathology reporting of endometrial carcinoma to practicing anatomic pathologists.

The pregnancy and oncology outcome of fertility-sparing management for synchronous primary neoplasm of endometrium and ovary

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of fertility-preserving treatment for young women with synchronous primary neoplasm of endometrium and ovary.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed eight patients with concurrent primary grade 1 presumed stage IA endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (EEA) or endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH) and primary stage I ovarian tumors who underwent fertility-sparing treatment in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University between April 2016 and December 2022.

RESULTS

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers (SEOC) accounted for 50% of these eight patients. The median age of patients was 30.5 years (range, 28-34 years). None of them received chemotherapy. The median treatment time was 4 months (range, 3-8 months). 87.5% (7/8) cases achieved complete response (CR), and the median time to CR was 3.8 months (range, 1.5-7.7 months). Among patients who got CR, none of them showed any signs of recurrence. Pregnancies and successful deliveries were achieved in 4 of 5 patients. Till September 2023, the median follow-up period was 50.5 months (range:15.2-85.2 months).

CONCLUSION

Fertility-sparing treatment is feasible for highly selected patients with synchronous neoplasm of the endometrium and ovary, but strict screening and monitoring are mandatory. Though the results of our limited cases are encouraging, long follow-up and more clinical data are required. Enrolled patients must be fully informed of the risks during conservative treatment.

The research progress on synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinoma

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinoma (SEOC) is the most common combination of primary double cancer in the female reproductive system. The etiology and pathogenesis of SEOC remain unclear, and clinically, it is often misdiagnosed as metastatic cancer, affecting the formulation of treatment plans and prognosis for patients. This article provides a review of its epidemiology, pathological and clinical characteristics, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.

Molecular biological analysis revealed a case of synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer with different histological grade as metastatic ovarian cancer from endometrial cancer: Case report and review of literature

The diagnosis of synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer or metastatic cancer of the same histological type is difficult. In this study, molecular biology analysis was performed to determine ovarian metastasis from endometrial cancer. A 38-year-old woman had pathological evidence of endometrial cancer (endometrioid carcinoma, grade 1) and ovarian cancer (endometrioid carcinoma, grade 3); a disseminated nodule in the serosa uteri was also diagnosed as endometrioid carcinoma (grade 3). Customized panel sequencing revealed a common mutation pattern in ovarian cancer and disseminated nodules. Furthermore, endometrial cancer showed the same mutation patterns for FGFR3 and PTEN as ovarian cancer and disseminated nodules. All tumors were microsatellite instability high. Clinicopathological and molecular biology analyses suggested that the patient had ovarian metastasis from endometrial cancer. The patient underwent adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin, with no recurrence. Molecular biology techniques may enable appropriate treatment based on clinically accurate diagnosis.

The Prognostic Effect of Immune Cell Infiltration Depends on Molecular Subtype in Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinomas

PURPOSE

Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) is the second most-common type of ovarian carcinoma, comprising 10%-20% of cases. Recently, the study of ENOC has benefitted from comparisons to endometrial carcinomas including defining ENOC with four prognostic molecular subtypes. Each subtype suggests differential mechanisms of progression, although tumor-initiating events remain elusive. There is evidence that the ovarian microenvironment may be critical to early lesion establishment and progression. However, while immune infiltrates have been well studied in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, studies in ENOC are limited.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We report on 210 ENOC, with clinical follow-up and molecular subtype annotation. Using multiplex IHC and immunofluorescence, we examine the prevalence of T-cell lineage, B-cell lineage, macrophages, and populations with programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed death-ligand 1 across subtypes of ENOC.

RESULTS

Immune cell infiltrates in tumor epithelium and stroma showed higher densities in ENOC subtypes with known high mutation burden (POLEmut and MMRd). While molecular subtypes were prognostically significant, immune infiltrates were not (overall survival P > 0.2). Analysis by molecular subtype revealed that immune cell density was prognostically significant in only the no specific molecular profile (NSMP) subtype, where immune infiltrates lacking B cells (TILB minus) had inferior outcome (disease-specific survival: HR, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-14.7; P < 0.05). Similar to endometrial carcinomas, molecular subtype stratification was generally superior to immune response in predicting outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Subtype stratification is critical for better understanding of ENOC, in particular the distribution and prognostic significance of immune cell infiltrates. The role of B cells in the immune response within NSMP tumors warrants further study.

FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023

INTRODUCTION

Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies.

METHODS

The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system.

RESULTS

Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: Stage I (IA1): non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. Stage II (IIA): non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. Stage III (IIIA): differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. Stage IV (IVA): locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (POLEmut, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or POLEmut status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICmp53abn or IAmPOLEmut).

SUMMARY

The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.

Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer and the 2023 FIGO Staging: Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities for Pathologists

This commentary explores the complexities of the FIGO 2023 staging system and the inclusion of The Cancer Genome Atlas's (TCGA) molecular classification in the management of endometrial cancer. It highlights the importance of histology as a prognostic tool, while scrutinizing the merits and demerits of its application to aggressive endometrial cancers. The commentary review sheds light on the recent introductions of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and lymph node metastasis size in cancer staging. It outlines the difficulties in differentiating between synchronous and metastatic endometrial and ovarian cancers, underlining their implications on treatment strategies. Furthermore, the commentary discusses the integration of molecular classifications within the FIGO 2023 framework, emphasizing the pivotal yet challenging implementation of the pathogenic POLE mutation test. The commentary concludes by reaffirming the vital role of pathologists in executing the FIGO 2023 staging system.

FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023

INTRODUCTION

Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies.

METHODS

The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system.

RESULTS

Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: Stage I (IA1): non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. Stage II (IIA): non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. Stage III (IIIA): differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. Stage IV (IVA): locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (POLEmut, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or POLEmut status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICmp53abn or IAmPOLEmut ).

SUMMARY

The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) is a rare genital tract tumor. Precise diagnosis is crucial for the disease management since prognosis and overall survival differ substantially between metastatic endometrial cancer (EC) or OC. In this review we present 2 cases of women who were diagnosed with SEOC, and discuss the clinical characteristic of SEOC, diagnostic and molecular profiling issues. Next generation sequencing of 10 gene panel was performed on cancerous tissue and uterine lavage samples.

CASE SUMMARY

In our report patients with SEOC had endometroid type histology with early stage and low-grade histology for both EC and OC. They underwent surgical treatment and staging. Next-generation sequencing of 10 gene-panel identified CTNNB1, PIK3CA, and PTEN gene mutations in ovarian tissue in one case, while none of these genes were mutated in other case. Literature review in support to our data suggest a good prognosis for SEOC diagnosed at early stage.

CONCLUSION

Accurate diagnosis of SEOC is essential for disease management and gene mutation analysis can be helpful as a complementary diagnostic and prognostic tool.

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer and its recurrent risk factors: Case series

BACKGROUND

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) is a relatively rare entity with indistinct clinical manifestation but have a better prognosis compared to metastatic malignancy of each organ. The aim of the study is to determine the prognosis and factors associated with recurrence of SEOC.

METHODS

This case-series study was performed on 37 histologically confirmed SEOC, diagnosed and treated in our tertiary hospital from March 2009 to September 2021. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates following indicated procedure were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to determine risk factors of recurrence.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 49.38 (age range: 26-78). The most common complaints and symptoms were abdominal pain (40.5%), followed by abnormal uterine bleeding (29.7%). Most common histological presentation was endometroid type for both ovarian (46%) and endometrial (97.3%) cancers. Over the mean follow-up period of 85.54 months, 11 patients developed recurrence without mortality. Non-endometrioid histology of ovarian cancer, higher grade and stage of ovarian cancer, and omentum invasion were significantly associated with worse DFS in unvariate analysis. Lymphovascular invasion was the sole predictor of DFS in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

While this study was not able to investigate the risk factors of overall survival associated with SEOC, the results of this study provides an overview of clinicopathological presentation of the disease and emphasizes the importance of lymphovascular invasion in determining prognosis and DFS in SEOC.

Endometrial, Ovarian, and Peritoneal Involvement by Endometrioid Carcinoma, Yolk Sac Tumor, and Endometriosis: Molecular Evidence for a Shared Precursor

Recent studies have provided molecular confirmation that a subset of yolk sac tumors is somatically derived. Somatically derived yolk sac tumors are typically diagnosed in older women and are often seen adjacent to epithelial proliferations (such as endometriosis or endometrioid carcinoma) with which they share mutations. Here, we present a case of a postmenopausal woman with a yolk sac tumor and endometriosis in the right ovary, endometriosis with glandular crowding and reactive changes in the left ovary, endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, and yolk sac tumor involving the serosa of the colon. Targeted next-generation sequencing of these five tumor components demonstrated identical mutations in PTEN (p.R130G), PIK3CA (p.G1049S), FGFR2 (p.S252W), and FBXW7 (p.R689Q), suggesting that all components arose from a common precursor. The endometrial endometrioid carcinoma harbored additional exclusive mutations involving PIK3CA (p.H1048R) and CTNNB1 (p.S37F).

Data Set for the Reporting of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR)

The move toward consistent and comprehensive surgical pathology reports for cancer resection specimens has been a key development in supporting evidence-based patient management and consistent cancer staging. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) previously developed a data set for reporting of the ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinomas which was published in 2015. In this paper, we provide an update on this data set, as a second edition, that reflects changes in the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumours as well as some other minor modifications. The data set has been developed by a panel of internationally recognized expert pathologists and a clinician and consists of "core" and "noncore" elements to be included in surgical pathology reports, with detailed commentary to guide users, including references. This data set replaces the widely used first edition, and will facilitate consistent and accurate case reporting, data collection for quality assurance and research, and allow for comparison of epidemiological and pathologic parameters between different populations.

Data Set for the Reporting of Endometrial Cancer: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR)

Endometrial cancer is one of the most common cancers among women. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) developed a standardized endometrial cancer data set in 2011, which provided detailed recommendations for the reporting of resection specimens of these neoplasms. A new data set has been developed, which incorporates the updated 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tumors, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular classification of endometrial cancers, and other major advances in endometrial cancer reporting, all of which necessitated a major revision of the data set. This updated data set has been produced by a panel of expert pathologists and an expert clinician and has been subject to international open consultation. The data set includes core elements which are unanimously agreed upon as essential for cancer diagnosis, clinical management, staging, or prognosis and noncore elements which are clinically important, but not essential. Explanatory notes are provided for each element. Adoption of this updated data set will result in improvements in endometrial cancer patient care.

Multisite gynecologic endometrioid adenocarcinomas: Can mutation profiling be used to distinguish synchronous primary cancers from metastases?

It is well recognized that some patients with endometrioid gynecological cancers have tumors arising in multiple sites (ovary, endometrium, and endometriosis) at the time of diagnosis. Molecular analysis has helped discern whether these multisite cancers represent synchronous primary tumors or alternatively metastatic disease. We present a complex case of a patient with endometrioid carcinomas arising in multiple sites. We discuss the use of mutation profiling to discern clonality and highlight how this information may inform the clinical management of such cases.

Elucidation of genomic origin of synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEO) by genomic and microsatellite analysis

OBJECTIVE

Elucidation of clonal origin of synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers (SEOs).

METHODS

We reviewed 852 patients who diagnosed endometrial and/or ovarian cancer. Forty-five (5.3%) patients were diagnosed as SEOs. We evaluated blood and tissue samples from 17 patients. We analyzed the clonal origins of 41 samples from 17 patients by gene sequencing, mismatch microsatellite instability (MSI) polymerase chain reaction assay and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of 4 repair genes.

RESULTS

Sixteen of 17 patients had at least 2 or more trunk mutations shared between endometrial and ovarian cancer suggesting the identical clonal origins. The shared trunk mutation are frequently found in endometrial cancer of the uterus, suggesting the uterine primary. Four out of 17 (24%) SEOs had mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency and MSI-high (MSI-H) states. One case was an endometrial carcinoma with local loss of MSH6 protein expression by IHC staining, and the result of MSI analysis using the whole formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimen was microsatellite stable. In contrast, ovarian tissue was deficient MMR and MSI-H in the whole specimen. This indicated that MMR protein deficiency could occur during the progression of disease.

CONCLUSION

Most SEOs are likely to be a single tumor with metastasis instead of double primaries, and their origin could be endometrium. In addition, SEOs have a high frequency of MMR gene abnormalities. These findings not only can support the notion of uterine primary, but also can help to expect the benefit for patients with SEOs by immuno-oncology treatment.

Molecular analysis suggests oligoclonality and metastasis of endometriosis lesions across anatomically defined subtypes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the heterogeneity of somatic cancer-driver mutations within patients and across endometriosis types.

DESIGN

A single-center cohort, retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary specialist-care center at a university hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Patients with surgically and histologically confirmed endometriosis of at least 2 anatomically distinct types (ovarian, deep infiltrating, and superficial).

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Specimens were analyzed for the presence or absence of somatic cancer-driver mutations using targeted panel sequencing with orthogonal validation using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and mutation-surrogate immunohistochemistry.

RESULT(S)

It was found that 13 of 27 patients had informative somatic driver mutations in endometriosis lesions; of these 13 patients, 9 had identical mutations across distinct lesions. Endometriomas showed a higher mutational complexity, with functionally redundant driver mutations in the same gene and within the same lesions.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our data are consistent with clonality across endometriosis lesions, regardless of subtype. Further, the finding of redundancy in mutations within the same gene and lesions is consistent with endometriosis representing an oligoclonal disease with dissemination likely to consist of multiple epithelial clones traveling together. This suggests that the current anatomically defined classification of endometriosis does not fully recognize the etiology of the disease. A novel classification should consider genomic and other molecular features to promote personalized endometriosis diagnosis and care.

Endometrial cancer with concomitant endometriosis is highly associated with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Endometriosis is assumed to be involved in ovarian cancer development, which is called endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC). Uterine endometrial cells may be the cell of origin of EAOC. Accumulated carcinogenic changes in the uterine endometrial cells may increase the risk of developing EAOC. To further understand the pathogenesis of EAOCs, we focused on the clinicopathological characteristics of EAOCs in endometrial cancer patients with concomitant endometriosis.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 376 patients who were surgically treated for stage I–III endometrial cancer. Clinicopathological characteristics were compared between patients with and without endometriosis. Furthermore, the incidence of simultaneous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) and the histological characteristics of SEOC were compared between the two groups.

Results

Among 376 patients with endometrial cancer, 51 had concomitant endometriosis. Patients with endometriosis were significantly younger and more frequently had endometrioid G1/G2 tumors than those without endometriosis. The incidence of SEOCs was significantly higher in endometrial cancer patients with endometriosis than those without it (p < 0.0001); notably, 12 of 51 endometrial cancer patients with endometriosis (24%) had SEOCs. All of the ovarian cancers in endometrial cancer patients with endometriosis were endometrioid carcinomas. Moreover, even in those without endometriosis, endometrioid carcinoma was the most common histological type of SEOC.

Conclusion

We revealed that endometrial cancer patients with endometriosis had a high probability of SEOC and that endometrioid carcinoma was the most common histological subtype of SEOC regardless of the presence of endometriosis. For patients with endometrial cancer and endometriosis, careful examination of ovarian endometriotic lesions may be important to detect EAOCs.

Safety of ovarian preservation for premenopausal patients with FIGO stage I grade 2 and 3 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utilization and outcomes of ovarian preservation for premenopausal patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I grade 2 and 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma undergoing hysterectomy.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was accessed; patients aged ≤45 years diagnosed between January 2004 and December 2015 with FIGO stage I grade 2 or 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, who underwent hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and had at least 1 month of follow-up, were identified. Overall survival was assessed following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control for a priori selected variables.

RESULTS

A total of 2941 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified; 200 (6.8%) patients did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Rate of ovarian preservation was comparable between patients with grade 2 (n=163, 6.6%) and grade 3 (n=37, 7.7%) tumors (p=0.38). Patients who did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were younger (median 39 vs 41 years, p<0.001) and less likely to undergo surgical lymph node assessment (52% vs 76.2%, p<0.001). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who did and did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (p=0.94); 5 year overall survival rates were 96.6% and 97%, respectively. After controlling for confounders, including tumor grade, ovarian preservation was not associated with worse overall survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.84).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with grade 2 and 3 FIGO stage I endometrioid carcinoma undergoing hysterectomy, ovarian preservation is rarely performed while no clear detrimental effect on overall survival was found.

Validated biomarker assays confirm that ARID1A loss is confounded with MMR deficiency, CD8+ TIL infiltration, and provides no independent prognostic value in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas

ARID1A (BAF250a) is a component of the SWI/SNF chromatin modifying complex, plays an important tumour suppressor role, and is considered prognostic in several malignancies. However, in ovarian carcinomas there are contradictory reports on its relationship to outcome, immune response, and correlation with clinicopathological features. We assembled a series of 1623 endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas, including 1078 endometrioid (ENOC) and 545 clear cell (CCOC) ovarian carcinomas, through combining resources of the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) Consortium, the Canadian Ovarian Unified Experimental Resource (COEUR), local, and collaborative networks. Validated immunohistochemical surrogate assays for ARID1A mutations were applied to all samples. We investigated associations between ARID1A loss/mutation, clinical features, outcome, CD8+ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8+ TILs), and DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). ARID1A loss was observed in 42% of CCOCs and 25% of ENOCs. We found no associations between ARID1A loss and outcomes, stage, age, or CD8+ TIL status in CCOC. Similarly, we found no association with outcome or stage in endometrioid cases. In ENOC, ARID1A loss was more prevalent in younger patients (p = 0.012) and was associated with MMRd (p < 0.001) and the presence of CD8+ TILs (p = 0.008). Consistent with MMRd being causative of ARID1A mutations, in a subset of ENOCs we also observed an association with ARID1A loss-of-function mutation as a result of small indels (p = 0.035, versus single nucleotide variants). In ENOC, the association with ARID1A loss, CD8+ TILs, and age appears confounded by MMRd status. Although this observation does not explicitly rule out a role for ARID1A influence on CD8+ TIL infiltration in ENOC, given current knowledge regarding MMRd, it seems more likely that effects are dominated by the hypermutation phenotype. This large dataset with consistently applied biomarker assessment now provides a benchmark for the prevalence of ARID1A loss-of-function mutations in endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers and brings clarity to the prognostic significance. © 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Intratumor genetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution to decode endometrial cancer progression

Analyzing different tumor regions by next generation sequencing allows the assessment of intratumor genetic heterogeneity (ITGH), a phenomenon that has been studied widely in some tumor types but has been less well explored in endometrial carcinoma (EC). In this study, we sought to characterize the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of 9 different ECs using whole-exome sequencing, and by performing targeted sequencing validation of the 42 primary tumor regions and 30 metastatic samples analyzed. In addition, copy number alterations of serous carcinomas were assessed by comparative genomic hybridization arrays. From the somatic mutations, identified by whole-exome sequencing, 532 were validated by targeted sequencing. Based on these data, the phylogenetic tree reconstructed for each case allowed us to establish the tumors’ evolution and correlate this to tumor progression, prognosis, and the presence of recurrent disease. Moreover, we studied the genetic landscape of an ambiguous EC and the molecular profile obtained was used to guide the selection of a potential personalized therapy for this patient, which was subsequently validated by preclinical testing in patient-derived xenograft models. Overall, our study reveals the impact of analyzing different tumor regions to decipher the ITGH in ECs, which could help make the best treatment decision.

Key changes to the world health organisation (who) classification of female genital tumours introduced in the 5TH edition (2020)

An updated World Health Organisation (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumours was published in Autumn 2020. We discuss the major new additions and changes from the prior 2014 Classification with discussion of the reasons underlying these. A feature of the new Classification is the greater emphasis on key molecular events with integration of morphological and-molecular features. Most of the major changes from the prior Classification pertain to uterine (corpus and cervix) and vulval tumours but changes in all organs are covered.

Does the "Devil" originate from the fallopian tubes?

Epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) is a heterogeneous disease and continues to be mostly diagnosed in advanced stages. The high lethality, the high rate of platinum-resistance, and the poor survival outcomes are the principal factors for categorizing OC among the most aggressive gynecological cancers. Only recently, a substantial progress has been made in our latest understanding of the origins of OC, particularly of high-grade serous histology. For a long time, the accumulation of genetic alterations in epithelial single layer cells of ovarian cysts caused by cyclic ovulations was considered as the most important driver and the long-standing dogma of ovarian tumorigenesis. Besides, the unique biological features and high histological heterogeneity of OC did not support this hypothesis. Indeed, various extra-ovarian cells of origin and multiple sites to each histotype were proposed, supported by cogent evidence from clinical cohorts and animal studies. In light of this enigma, this review was conducted to discuss the recent evidence supporting the revised origins of ovarian carcinoma histotypes with a particular focus on high-grade serous OC which may impact diagnostic and preventive approaches.

Molecular Pathology of Ovarian Epithelial Neoplasms: Predictive, Prognostic, and Emerging Biomarkers

This review focuses on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive molecular biomarkers in ovarian epithelial neoplasms in the context of their morphologic classifications. Currently, most clinically actionable molecular findings are reported in high-grade serous carcinomas; however, the data on less common tumor types are rapidly accelerating. Overall, the advances in genomic knowledge over the last decade highlight the significance of integrating molecular findings with morphology in ovarian epithelial tumors for a wide-range of clinical applications, from assistance in diagnosis to predicting response to therapy.

Clinical outcomes of patients with endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer following surgical treatment

BACKGROUND

Endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer (EEOC) is rare, and its management poorly defined. We examined factors associated with 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) after surgery for EEOC.

METHODS

Retrospective study: treatment and outcomes of all EEOC patients undergoing initial surgery at, or presenting to, our institution within 3 months of initial surgery, 1/2002-9/2017.

RESULTS

In total, 212 patients were identified. Median follow-up, 63.9 months (range, 0.7-192); median age at diagnosis, 52 years (range, 20-88); disease stage: I, n = 145 (68%); II, n = 47 (22%); III/IV, n = 20 (9%); FIGO grade: 1, 127 (60%); 2, 66 (31%); 3, 17 (8%); unknown, 2 (1%). One hundred twenty-eight (60%) had endometriosis; 75 (35%), synchronous endometrioid endometrial cancer (80%, IA); 101 (48%), complete surgical staging; 8 (5%), positive pelvic lymph nodes (LNs); 6 (4%), positive para-aortic LNs; 176 (97%), complete gross resection; 123 (60%), postoperative chemotherapy; 56(28%), no additional treatment. Five-year PFS, 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76.6%-87.8%); 5-year overall survival (OS), 92.7% (95% CI: 87.7%-95.8%). Age, stage, and surgical staging were associated with improved 5-year PFS, and younger age at diagnosis with improved 5-year OS (p < 0.001). Chemotherapy did not improve 5-year PFS in IA/IB versus observation, but improved survival in IC (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.22-4.59, p = 0.99; HR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.7, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Age, stage, and full surgical staging were associated with improved 5-year PFS. Chemotherapy showed no benefit in IA/IB disease.

Diagnostic workup for endometrioid borderline ovarian tumors (eBOT) requires histopathological evaluation of the uterus

Background

For young borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) patients, preservation of the uterus was incorporated as an accepted option into treatment guidelines. For the endometrioid subtype (eBOT) however, adequate histological evaluation is challenging and might be associated with synchronous endometrial disorders or misinterpreted as spread from uterine primaries.

Case presentation

We report the cases of two young patients with eBOT who underwent treatment according to current guidelines. In both cases, unexpected findings of invasive uterine carcinomas were established in final histopathological evaluation.

Conclusions

This constellation highlights the challenging diagnostic workup of BOT and underlines that uterine curettage is indispensable for eBOT to exclude uterine primary tumors when fertility preservation is planned. Accordingly, we suggest to include this procedure into recommendations for diagnostic workup and to state the potential risk in treatment guidelines.

Molecular evidence for a clonal relationship between synchronous uterine endometrioid carcinoma and ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a new example of "precursor escape"?

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas (SEOCs) that share the same endometrioid histology are generally considered as the result of metastatic spread from one organ to another. However, SEOCs with different histologies are regarded as distinct primary lesions that arise independently from each other. This study was undertaken to compare the mutational landscape of SEOCs with different histologies to confirm or refute the hypothesis of an independent origin. Four patients with synchronous uterine endometrioid carcinoma (UEMC) and ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) were examined. UEMCs were accompanied by endometrial hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia, whereas endometriosis was evident in two cases. Paired UEMC and OCCC specimens were subjected to mutation analysis with massively parallel sequencing. Surprisingly, we found that 50% (2/4) of paired SEOCs with different histologies shared the same somatic mutations, some of which localized in cancer driver genes. Clonality analyses indicated that these tumors were clonally related to each other. Notably, 75% (3/4) of the study patients had Lynch syndrome. The cancer-specific survival figures of patients with synchronous UEMCs and OCCCs were more favorable than those observed in a historical cohort of patients with isolated stage 2/3 OCCCs. Taken together, we set forth a potential explanation that considers clonally related SEOCs as a result of "precursor escape" - whereby precursor cells of endometrial cancer spread beyond the uterus to reach the pelvis and eventually evolve into an OCCC under an increasing mutational burden. KEY MESSAGES: • SEOCs characterized by different histologies are rare. • All cases of SEOCs were accompanied by endometrial hyperplasia. • Fifty percent of SEOCs were clonally related to each other. • Shared mutations in cancer driver genes were evident among SEOCs. • Clonally related SEOCs may be a result of "precursor escape." • Lynch syndrome is highly prevalent in patients with UEMC and synchronous OCCC. • The prognosis of synchronous UEMC and OCCC was favorable.

Genomic alterations in gynecological malignancies: histotype-associated driver mutations, molecular subtyping schemes, and tumorigenic mechanisms

There are numerous histological subtypes (histotypes) of gynecological malignancies, with each histotype considered to largely reflect a feature of the "cell of origin," and to be tightly linked with the clinical behavior and biological phenotype of the tumor. The recent advances in massive parallel sequencing technologies have provided a more complete picture of the range of the genomic alterations that can persist within individual tumors, and have highlighted the types and frequencies of driver-gene mutations and molecular subtypes often associated with these histotypes. Several large-scale genomic cohorts, including the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), have been used to characterize the genomic features of a range of gynecological malignancies, including high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma, uterine cervical carcinoma, and uterine carcinosarcoma. These datasets have also been pivotal in identifying clinically relevant molecular targets and biomarkers, and in the construction of molecular subtyping schemes. In addition, the recent widespread use of clinical sequencing for the more ubiquitous types of gynecological cancer has manifested in a series of large genomic datasets that have allowed the characterization of the genomes, driver mutations, and histotypes of even rare cancer types, with sufficient statistical power. Here, we review the field of gynecological cancer, and seek to describe the genomic features by histotype. We also will demonstrate how these are linked with clinicopathological attributes and highlight the potential tumorigenic mechanisms.

A Review of the Clinical Characteristics and Novel Molecular Subtypes of Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common gynecologic cancers that has the highest mortality rate. Endometrioid ovarian cancer, a distinct subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, is associated with endometriosis and Lynch syndrome, and is often accompanied by synchronous endometrial carcinoma. In recent years, dysbiosis of the microbiota within the female reproductive tract has been suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer, with some specific pathogens exhibiting oncogenic having been found to contribute to cancer development. It has been shown that dysregulation of the microenvironment and accumulation of mutations are stimulatory factors in the progression of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. This would be a potential therapeutic target in the future. Simultaneously, multiple studies have demonstrated the role of four molecular subtypes of endometrioid ovarian cancer, which are of particular importance in the prediction of prognosis. This literature review aims to compile the potential mechanisms of endometrioid ovarian cancer, molecular characteristics, and molecular pathological types that could potentially play a role in the prediction of prognosis, and the novel therapeutic strategies, providing some guidance for the stratified management of ovarian cancer.

Ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer: a 2-step schema

In 2020, endometrial cancer continues to be the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States. The majority of endometrial cancer is low grade, and nearly 1 of every 8 low-grade endometrial cancer diagnoses occurs in women younger than 50 years with early-stage disease. The incidence of early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer is increasing particularly among women in their 30s. Women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer generally have a favorable prognosis, and hysterectomy-based surgical treatment alone can often be curative. In young women with endometrial cancer, consideration of ovarian conservation is especially relevant to avoid both the short-term and long-term sequelae of surgical menopause including menopausal symptoms, cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, and osteoporosis. Although disadvantages of ovarian conservation include failure to remove ovarian micrometastasis (0.4%-0.8%), gross ovarian metastatic disease (4.2%), or synchronous ovarian cancer (3%-5%) at the time of surgery and the risk of future potential metachronous ovarian cancer (1.2%), ovarian conservation is not negatively associated with endometrial cancer-related or all-cause mortality in young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer. Despite this, utilization of ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer remains modest with only a gradual increase in uptake in the United States. We propose a framework and strategic approach to identify young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer who may be candidates for ovarian conservation. This evidence-based schema consists of a 2-step assessment at both the preoperative and intraoperative stages that can be universally integrated into practice.

Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma: A 21-year retrospective study

Objective

This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics of Chinese patients with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC) and clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and to assess the impact of concurrent endometriosis on this group.

Methods

The present study reviewed the medical records of patients who received initial treatment and a postoperative pathological diagnosis of EC or CCC at our center in China between 1998 and 2018.

Results

Of 211 patients, 73 had pure EC, and 91 had pure CCC, and the remaining 47 had mixed cancer. The proportion of EC and CCC remained stable over past 21 years. The proportion of EC declined with aging and the age of EC onset to incline to the young. And the age of CCC onset had two peaks, namely, 36 and 77 years. After review by the pathologist, the number of endometriosis cases found in the pathological section of the analysis increased to 114, accounting for 54% of patients. As the stage progressed, the appearance of endometriosis became increasingly scarce in pathological sections(p = 0.001).

Compared with CCC, EC had a higher frequency of concurrent endometrial cancer (independent endometrial lesions) and estrogen and progesterone receptor expression(p = 0.000). And more patients were in premenopausal state in EC group(p = 0.040).

In the pure group, multivariate analysis showed that correlation existed between relevance to endometriosis and worse outcomes(p = 0.041). In patients with mixed cancer, mixed endometrioid histology was associated with better survival than other subtypes, even with stage III or poorly differentiated tumors(p = 0.001).

Conclusions

CCC and EC which are common in ovarian cancer patients who have associated with endometriosis have distinct clinicopathological characteristics. Attention should be paid to ovarian cancer patients with a history of endometriosis and those with concurrent endometriosis in pathological sections.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13048-021-00804-1.

How to manage synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer patients?

Backgrounds

We aimed to evaluate the prognosis in patients with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) by comparing the differences between double primary cancer (DPC) and metastatic cancer (MC).

Methods

The medical records of 47 patients diagnosed synchronously with endometrial and ovarian cancer between January 2006 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-eight and 19 patients were diagnosed with DPC and MC, respectively. Demographics, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and 5-year overall survival (OS) were compared. The clinical factors affecting survival were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

The demographics were not different between both groups. Endometrioid histology and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade were higher in the MC group than in the DPC group (42.1% vs. 10.7%; P = 0.018, P = 0.002, respectively). The ratio of post-operative adjuvant therapy was not different in both groups. Recurrence occurred in five patients with DPC and seven with MC. The difference in RFS was not significantly different (P = 0.131) but the OS was different between both groups (P = 0.020). Histology and para-aortic lymph node metastasis were associated wtih RFS in univariate analysis, but no difference was found in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Although DPC patients had longer OS, multivariate analysis did not identify any influential factors. Focus should be placed on defining the appropriate adjuvant treatment for high-risk patients, which will improve prognosis, rather than on discriminating between DPC and MC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08220-w.

Clonal relationship and directionality of progression of synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas in patients with DNA mismatch repair-deficiency associated syndromes

Sporadic synchronous endometrial (ECs) and ovarian cancers (OCs), although clinically considered to be independent primaries, have been shown to be clonally related and likely constitute metastases from each other. We sought to define whether synchronous ECs/OCs in patients with DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-deficiency syndromes would be clonally related. We subjected synchronous ECs/OCs from four patients (LS3-LS6) with clinically confirmed Lynch syndrome (LS) and one patient with constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency syndrome (CMMRD) to massively parallel sequencing targeting 468 cancer-related genes. Somatic mutations, copy number alterations (CNAs), clonal relatedness and clonal decomposition analyses were performed using previously described bioinformatics methods. All synchronous ECs/OCs analyzed were considered independent primaries based on clinicopathologic criteria. Sequencing analysis revealed that the ECs/OCs of three cases (LS2-CMMRD, L3, L4) harbored similar repertoires of somatic mutations and CNAs and were clonally related. In these three cases, a subset of subclonal mutations in the EC became clonal in the OC, suggesting that the EC was likely the substrate from which the OC developed. LS5's EC/OC had distinct mutational profiles but shared specific CNAs. In contrast, LS6's EC/OC harbored distinct somatic mutations and lacked CNAs, consistent with each tumor constituting an independent primary lesion. In LS5 and LS6, PTEN mutations and PTEN loss of protein expression were found to be restricted to the EC. Finally, re-analysis of sequencing data of sporadic synchronous ECs/OCs supported the observations made in the current study that the directionality of progression is likely from the endometrium to the ovary. In conclusion, contrary to sporadic synchronous ECs/OCs, which are almost invariably clonally related, ECs/OCs simultaneously involving the uterus and ovary in LS patients may represent distinct primary tumors. A subset of MMR-deficiency syndrome-related synchronous ECs/OCs, however, may originate from a single primary tumor at variance with their clinical diagnosis, with the endometrium being the likeliest site of origin.

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma

A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma

A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.