Epidemiology, Biology, Treatment, and Prevention of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)

Duration of Endocrine Treatment for DCIS impacts second events: Insights from a large cohort of cases at two academic medical centers

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) incidence has risen rapidly with the introduction of screening mammography, yet it is unclear who benefits from both the amount and type of adjuvant treatment (radiation therapy, (RT), endocrine therapy (ET)) versus what constitutes over-treatment. Our goal was to identify the effects of adjuvant RT, or ET+/- RT versus breast conservation surgery (BCS) alone in a large multi-center registry of retrospective DCIS cases (N = 1,916) with median follow up of 8.2 years. We show that patients with DCIS who took less than 2 years of adjuvant ET alone have a similar second event rate as BCS. However, patients who took more than 2 years of ET show a significantly reduced second event rate, similar to those who received either RT or combined ET+RT, which was independent of age, tumor size, grade, or period of diagnosis. This highlights the importance of ET duration for risk reduction.

Association of DCIS size and margin status with risk of developing breast cancer post-treatment: multinational, pooled cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between size and margin status of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and risk of developing ipsilateral invasive breast cancer and ipsilateral DCIS after treatment, and stage and subtype of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer.

DESIGN

Multinational, pooled cohort study.

SETTING

Four large international cohorts.

PARTICIPANTS

Patient level data on 47 695 women with a diagnosis of pure, primary DCIS between 1999 and 2017 in the Netherlands, UK, and US who underwent surgery, either breast conserving or mastectomy, often followed by radiotherapy or endocrine treatment, or both.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcomes were 10 year cumulative incidence of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer and ipsilateral DCIS estimated in relation to DCIS size and margin status, and adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals, estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses with multiple imputed data RESULTS: The 10 year cumulative incidence of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer was 3.2%. In women who underwent breast conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy, only adjusted risks for ipsilateral DCIS were significantly increased for larger DCIS (20-49 mm) compared with DCIS <20 mm (hazard ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 1.72). Risks for both ipsilateral invasive breast cancer and ipsilateral DCIS were significantly higher with involved compared with clear margins (invasive breast cancer 1.40, 1.07 to 1.83; DCIS 1.39, 1.04 to 1.87). Use of adjuvant endocrine treatment was not significantly associated with a lower risk of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer compared to treatment with breast conserving surgery only (0.86, 0.62 to 1.21). In women who received breast conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy, higher DCIS grade was not significantly associated with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer, only with a higher risk of ipsilateral DCIS (grade 1: 1.42, 1.08 to 1.87; grade 3: 2.17, 1.66 to 2.83). Higher age at diagnosis was associated with lower risk (per year) of ipsilateral DCIS (0.98, 0.97 to 0.99) but not ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (1.00, 0.99 to 1.00). Women with large DCIS (≥50 mm) more often developed stage III and IV ipsilateral invasive breast cancer compared to women with DCIS <20 mm. No such association was found between involved margins and higher stage of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer. Associations between larger DCIS and hormone receptor negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive ipsilateral invasive breast cancer and involved margins and hormone receptor negative ipsilateral invasive breast cancer were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The association of DCIS size and margin status with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer and ipsilateral DCIS was small. When these two factors were added to other known risk factors in multivariable models, clinicopathological risk factors alone were found to be limited in discriminating between low and high risk DCIS.

Risk factors for breast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis differ from those for invasive recurrence

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ is rare, making it difficult to predict which patients are at risk and to identify whether risk factors for this outcome are the same as those for invasive recurrence. We aimed to identify whether risk factors for invasive recurrences are similar to those for breast cancer death after a diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was queried for female patients diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ. Cumulative incidence was estimated by treatment group using competing risks. Competing risks regression was then performed for the development of in-breast invasive recurrence with competing risks of breast and non-breast cancer death. Competing risks regression was then again performed for development of breast cancer mortality with the competing risk of non-breast cancer death.

RESULTS

A total of 29,515 patients were identified. Of them, 164 patients suffered breast cancer mortality without an intervening invasive recurrence, and 44 suffered breast cancer mortality after an invasive in-breast recurrence. On competing risks analysis for invasive in-breast recurrence, significant factors included lesion size >5 cm (hazard ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval 1.24-2.04, P < .001), diffuse disease (hazard ratio = 0.0005, 95% confidence interval 0.0003-0.0007, P < .001), other race (hazard ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.52, P = .002), Black race (hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.46, P = .04), age at diagnosis (hazard ratio = 0.99, confidence interval 0.98-1.00, P = .02), low-grade disease (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.96, P = .02), lumpectomy with radiation (hazard ratio = 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.77, P < .001), and mastectomy (hazard ratio = 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.44, P < .001). Significant factors for breast cancer mortality included age at diagnosis (hazard ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.05, P < .001), Black race (hazard ratio = 2.88, 95% confidence interval 2.08-3.99, P < .001), diffuse disease (hazard ratio = 6.02, 95% confidence interval 1.39-26.07, P = .02), lumpectomy with radiation (hazard ratio = 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.72, P < .001), and mastectomy (hazard ratio = 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.92, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that risk factors for in-breast invasive recurrence after a diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ differ from risk factors for breast cancer mortality and development of metastatic recurrence. In-breast invasive recurrence is not the only consideration for breast cancer specific mortality in ductal carcinoma in situ patients.

Insights into Immune Escape During Tumor Evolution and Response to Immunotherapy Using a Rat Model of Breast Cancer

Animal models are critical for the preclinical validation of cancer immunotherapies. Unfortunately, mouse breast cancer models do not faithfully reproduce the molecular subtypes and immune environment of the human disease. In particular, there are no good murine models of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, the predominant subtype in patients. Here, we show that Nitroso-N-methylurea-induced mammary tumors in outbred Sprague-Dawley rats recapitulate the heterogeneity for mutational profiles, ER expression, and immune evasive mechanisms observed in human breast cancer. We demonstrate the utility of this model for preclinical studies by dissecting mechanisms of response to immunotherapy using combination TGFBR inhibition and PD-L1 blockade. Short-term treatment of early-stage tumors induced durable responses. Gene expression profiling and spatial mapping classified tumors as inflammatory and noninflammatory, and identified IFNγ, T-cell receptor (TCR), and B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling, CD74/MHC II, and epithelium-interacting CD8+ T cells as markers of response, whereas the complement system, M2 macrophage phenotype, and translation in mitochondria were associated with resistance. We found that the expression of CD74 correlated with leukocyte fraction and TCR diversity in human breast cancer. We identified a subset of rat ER+ tumors marked by expression of antigen-processing genes that had an active immune environment and responded to treatment. A gene signature characteristic of these tumors predicted disease-free survival in patients with ER+ Luminal A breast cancer and overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving anti-PD-L1 therapy. We demonstrate the usefulness of this preclinical model for immunotherapy and suggest examination to expand immunotherapy to a subset of patients with ER+ disease. See related Spotlight by Roussos Torres, p. 672.

"Is it cancer or not?" A qualitative exploration of survivor concerns surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND

Of the nearly 50,000 women in the United States who undergo treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) annually, many may not benefit from treatment. To better understand the impact of a DCIS diagnosis, patients self-identified as having had DCIS were engaged regarding their experience.

METHODS

In July 2014, a web-based survey was administered through the Susan Love Army of Women breast cancer listserv. The survey included open-ended questions designed to assess patients' perspectives about DCIS diagnosis and treatment. Deductive and inductive codes were applied to the responses; common themes were summarized.

RESULTS

Among the 1832 women included in the analytic sample, the median age at diagnosis was 60 years. Four primary themes were identified: 1) uncertainty surrounding a DCIS diagnosis, 2) uncertainty about DCIS treatment, 3) concern about treatment side effects, and 4) concern about recurrence and/or developing invasive breast cancer. When diagnosed, participants were often uncertain about whether they had cancer or not and whether they should be considered a "survivor." Uncertainty about treatment manifested as questioning the appropriateness of the amount of treatment received. Participants expressed concern about the "cancer spreading" or becoming invasive and that they were not necessarily "doing enough" to prevent recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large, national sample, participants with a history of DCIS reported confusion and concern about the diagnosis and treatment, which caused worry and significant uncertainty. Developing strategies to improve patient and provider communications regarding the nature of DCIS and acknowledging gaps in the current knowledge of management options should be a priority.

Large and diffuse ductal carcinoma in situ: potentially lethal subtypes of "preinvasive" disease

PURPOSE

Trials for DCIS have not explored whether outcomes for patients with large disease burden requiring mastectomy are comparable to those of patients with lumpectomy-amenable disease. We aim to identify whether patients with DCIS larger than 5 cm and diffuse-type DCIS differ in breast cancer mortality (BCM) from patients with disease less than 5 cm.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with DCIS in the SEER program were assessed to identify factors prognostic of breast-cancer-specific survival using competing risks regression.

RESULTS

44,849 patients met criteria for the cumulative incidence estimate. On competing risks cumulative incidence approximation, the 10-year estimate for BCM for each group was 1.3%, 1.3%, 2.3%, and 5.1%, respectively, and the difference among groups was significant (p = 0.017). On competing risks regression of patients with known covariates, both diffuse-type disease and disease larger than 5 cm (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.2 and 1.7, p = 0.013 and p = 0.042, respectively) were associated with increased risk of BCM. After matching, DCIS > 5 cm and diffuse disease were associated with increased BCM relative to disease < 5 cm (HR = 1.69, p = 0.04). Among patients undergoing mastectomy for disease larger than 5 cm or diffuse disease, the 10-year cumulative incidence for BCM was 0.5% among patients undergoing bilateral mastectomy and 2.4% for patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy.

CONCLUSION

Patients with large and diffuse DCIS represent uncommon but poorly studied DCIS subgroups with worse prognoses than patients with disease smaller than 5 cm. Further studies are needed to elucidate the appropriate treatment for these patients.

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in non-invasive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The role of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as a biomarker in non-invasive breast cancer is unclear. This meta-analysis assessed the prognostic impact of TIL levels in patients with non-invasive breast cancer.

Methods

Systematic literature search was performed to identify studies assessing local recurrence in patients with non-invasive breast cancer according to TIL levels (high vs. low). Subgroup analyses per local recurrence (invasive and non-invasive) were performed. Secondary objectives were the association between TIL levels and non-invasive breast cancer subtypes, age, grade and necrosis. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted from each study and a pooled analysis was conducted with random-effect model.

Results

Seven studies (N = 3437) were included in the present meta-analysis. High-TILs were associated with a higher likelihood of local recurrence (invasive or non-invasive, N = 2941; OR 2.05; 95%CI, 1.03–4.08; p = 0.042), although with a lower likelihood of invasive local recurrence (N = 1722; OR 0.69; 95%CI, 0.49–0.99; p = 0.042). High-TIL levels were associated with triple-negative (OR 3.84; 95%CI, 2.23–6.61; p < 0.001) and HER2-positive (OR 6.27; 95%CI, 4.93–7.97; p < 0.001) subtypes, high grade (OR 5.15; 95%CI, 3.69–7.19; p < 0.001) and necrosis (OR 3.09; 95%CI, 2.33–4.10; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

High-TIL levels were associated with more aggressive tumours, a higher likelihood of local recurrence (invasive or non-invasive) but a lower likelihood of invasive local recurrence in patients with non-invasive breast cancer.

•

The prognostic role of TILs in non-invasive breast cancer is unknown.

•

We observed an association between high-TILs and local recurrence.

•

High-TILs were associated with triple-negative and HER2+ subtypes, high grade and necrosis.

•

Non-invasive lesions with aggressive characteristics may also be more immunogenic.

•

Patients with low-TILs showed a higher likelihood of presenting an invasive recurrence.

A Pooled Analysis to Compare the Clinical Characteristics of Human Papillomavirus-positive and -Negative Cervical Precancers

Given that high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is the necessary cause of virtually all cervical cancer, the clinical meaning of HPV-negative cervical precancer is unknown. We, therefore, conducted a literature search in Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar to identify English-language studies in which (i) HPV-negative and -positive, histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe diagnoses (CIN2+) were detected and (ii) summarized statistics or deidentified individual data were available to summarize proportions of biomarkers indicating risk of cancer. Nineteen studies including 3,089 (91.0%) HPV-positive and 307 (9.0%) HPV-negative CIN2+ were analyzed. HPV-positive CIN2+ (vs. HPV-negative CIN2+) was more likely to test positive for biomarkers linked to cancer risk: a study diagnosis of CIN3+ (vs. CIN2; 18 studies; 0.56 vs. 0.24; P < 0.001) preceding high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology (15 studies; 0.54 vs. 0.10; P < 0.001); and high-grade colposcopic impression (13 studies; 0.30 vs. 0.18; P = 0.03). HPV-negative CIN2+ was more likely to test positive for low-risk HPV genotypes than HPV-positive CIN2+ (P < 0.001). HPV-negative CIN2+ appears to have lower cancer risk than HPV-positive CIN2+. Clinical studies of human high-risk HPV testing for screening to prevent cervical cancer may refer samples of HPV test-negative women for disease ascertainment to correct verification bias in the estimates of clinical performance. However, verification bias adjustment of the clinical performance of HPV testing may overcorrect/underestimate its clinical performance to detect truly precancerous abnormalities.

HER2-Overexpressing Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Associated with Increased Risk of Ipsilateral Invasive Recurrence, Receptor Discordance with Recurrence

The impact of HER2 status in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on the risk of progression to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) has been debated. We aim to use a national database to identify patients with known HER2 status to elucidate the effect of HER2 overexpression on ipsilateral IDC (iIDC) development. We performed survival analysis on patient-level data using the U.S. NCI's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program. We identified patients diagnosed with DCIS who underwent lumpectomy and had known HER2 status. Competing risks analysis was performed. A total of 1,540 patients had known HER2 status and met inclusion criteria. Median age at diagnosis was 60, median follow-up time was 44.5 months. A total of 417 (27.1%) patients were HER2 positive and 1,035 (67.2%) were HER2 negative. Twenty-two (1.4%) patients developed iIDC and 27 (1.8%) developed ipsilateral in situ or contralateral disease. The estimated cumulative incidence of iIDC at 5 years was 1.9% for all patients, 1.2% for HER2-negative and borderline patients, and 3.9% for HER2-positive patients. On multivariate competing risks regression, two factors were significant for iIDC: radiation (protective) therapy within 24 months (HR, 0.05; P = 0.00006) and HER2 overexpression (increased likelihood; HR, 2.72; P = 0.044). Patients with HER2-positive DCIS were more likely to have recurrences with receptor discordance. HER2 may serve as a prognostic factor for invasive recurrence and was the only lesion-related factor to significantly relate to iIDC development. It may also be associated with receptor discordance of recurrences. Further large studies will be needed to confirm these results.

Estimating the magnitude of clinical benefit of local therapy in patients with DCIS

DCIS represents a heterogeneous disease with a wide range of outcomes according to biology. Without treatment, it is estimated that only 20-30% of DCIS will progress to invasive cancer. Long-term outcomes following treatment are at least as favorable as those for some other early stage cancer types such as prostate cancer, for which active surveillance is routinely offered as a standard of care option. However, active surveillance has not yet been tested in relation to DCIS. Worldwide, there are three international trials (LORIS, COMET, LORD) which are evaluating whether DCIS with favorable biologic features may be managed with close monitoring, with treatment only undertaken upon disease progression. These trials will determine whether there may be some women with low-risk DCIS who do not substantially benefit from treatment and who could thus be safely managed with close surveillance. If active monitoring for DCIS is deemed to be safe and feasible, additional work must be done to optimally implement this approach, involving effective communication between patients and their physicians about the risks and benefits of treatment versus surveillance. Importantly, these treatment decisions must take into account patient factors such as risk tolerance, age, and competing causes of mortality. Tailoring treatment to biology for early screen-detected cancers such as DCIS is an important goal of ongoing research. An improved understanding of the biology and clinical implications of this heterogeneous disease will improve the overall health and quality of life for hundreds of thousands of future women who will be diagnosed with DCIS.

Everolimus Inhibits the Progression of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Breast Cancer Via Downregulation of MMP9 Expression

PURPOSE

We evaluated the role of everolimus in the prevention of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) progression.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The effects of everolimus on breast cancer cell invasion, DCIS formation, and DCIS progression to IDC were investigated in a 3D cell culturing model, intraductal DCIS xenograft model, and spontaneous MMTV-Her2/neu mouse model. The effect of everolimus on matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) expression was determined with Western blotting and IHC in these models and in patients with DCIS before and after a window trial with rapamycin. Whether MMP9 mediates the inhibition of DCIS progression to IDC by everolimus was investigated with knockdown or overexpression of MMP9 in breast cancer cells.

RESULTS

Everolimus significantly inhibited the invasion of human breast cancer cells in vitro. Daily intragastric treatment with everolimus for 7 days significantly reduced the number of invasive lesions from intraductal DCIS foci and inhibited DCIS progression to IDC in the MMTV-Her2/neu mouse mammary tumor model. Mechanistically, everolimus treatment decreased the expression of MMP9 in the in vitro and in vivo models, and in breast tissues from patients with DCIS treated with rapamycin for 1 week. Moreover, overexpression of MMP9 stimulated the invasion, whereas knockdown of MMP9 inhibited the invasion of breast cancer cell-formed spheroids in vitro and DCIS in vivo. Knockdown of MMP9 also nullified the invasion inhibition by everolimus in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting mTORC1 can inhibit DCIS progression to IDC via MMP9 and may be a potential strategy for DCIS or early-stage IDC therapy.