Infections in travellers returning to the UK: a retrospective analysis (2015-2020)

Imported fever in returning travellers and migrants in Spain, 2009-2021. Analysis by the +REDIVI network

BACKGROUND

Travellers and migrants commonly present to health services with febrile syndrome, which can have different causes, including some that are life-threatening. A better understanding of these causes may help guide management and determine appropriate empirical treatments.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to identify the leading causes of fever and to assess their association with the region of travel and type of travellers.

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre study was conducted within the +REDIVI network. Data were collected on febrile syndrome cases among migrants, travellers, and people visiting friends and relatives (VFRs) from 2009 to 2021. Comparative analyses were performed according to patient categories and regions of travel/origin.

RESULTS

Of the 4186 patients with febrile syndrome, the most frequent diagnosis was malaria (31.0 %), followed by dengue fever (12.0 %) and nonspecific fever of less than three weeks' duration (11.6 %). Malaria predominated in people coming from sub-Saharan Africa (58.4 %), while dengue fever was more common in the rest of the regions (19.0 % in South America, 25.0 % in Central America and the Caribbean, 34.2 % in Southeast Asia, and 18.1 % in South-Central Asia). By type of traveller, tuberculosis was more frequent in migrants, malaria in VFRs, and dengue and other arboviral infections in travellers and VFRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Geographical area of travel and type of traveller are the main determinants of imported fever aetiology. Malaria remains the most common cause of febrile syndrome, especially in VFRs from sub-Saharan Africa, while dengue fever prevails in the other tropical regions.

First clinical experiences with the tetravalent live vaccine against dengue (Qdenga®) in travellers: a multicentric TravVacNet study in Germany

BACKGROUND

A study was conducted to assess the safety and tolerability of the tetravalent live-attenuated dengue vaccine Qdenga®, which received marketing approval in Germany in 2022. The study evaluated vaccine-related reactions in a predominantly dengue-naïve population, highlighting the importance of post-marketing surveillance as an essential component of safety evaluation for newly licensed vaccines.

METHODS

Following dengue vaccination, participants were recruited for an anonymous online questionnaire through the national 'Trav VacNet' network in Germany. The questionnaire focused on post-vaccination reactions up to 18 days after the first and second vaccination, as well as previous travel history and coadministration.

RESULTS

The study included 1176 participants, with a median age of 39 years (IQR 28-56), 53.2% female (n = 625), 46.5% male (n = 547), and 0.3% non-binary participants (n = 4). After the first dose, 51% of the participants reported systemic reactions such as headache [40% (190/474)], weakness [40% (189/474)], and malaise [32% (154/474)], which were most pronounced between days 7 and 11 post vaccination. After the second dose, localized signs and symptoms such as pain at the injection site [22% (n = 55/250)] were more common. Fever was more common after the first dose [20% (96/474)] vs. 2% (6/250) after the second. Females reported significantly more reactions than males after both vaccinations (1st dose P = 0.0002; 2nd dose P = 0.0003). A total of 334 (28%) co-administrations were reported whereby assessing adverse events were reported in 47% (157/333) of participants, with the highest prevalence observed when combined with the Japanese encephalitis vaccine [56.8%, (42/74)]. Differences in age groups were observed, with a decrease in reactions in the elderly (≥65 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccine-related reactions were frequently reported, predominantly after the first dose in dengue-naïve participants. Coadministration was a common strategy without significantly increasing side effects. The study provides important insights into reactogenicity and may help improve vaccination strategies in dengue-naïve populations.

Tick-borne encephalitis: from tick surveillance to the first confirmed human cases, the United Kingdom, 2015 to 2023

BackgroundTick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is a flavivirus spread by ticks and can cause tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in humans. Previously, TBE has been reported in returning travellers in the United Kingdom (UK), but in 2019 and 2020, two probable cases of TBE acquired in the UK were identified.AimThe aim of this study was to investigate TBE cases in the UK between 2015 and 2023, describing the incidence, place and mode of acquisition and diagnostic process.MethodsA retrospective review of possible, probable and confirmed cases of TBE diagnosed by the Rare and Imported Pathogens Laboratory (RIPL) between January 2015 and December 2023 was performed. For cases identified in 2022 and 2023, clinical data were collected for enhanced surveillance using structured case record forms. Laboratory diagnosis is reviewed and described.ResultsWe identified 21 cases: three possible, seven probable and 11 confirmed cases. Of these, 12 were between January 2022 and December 2023: three possible, three probable and six confirmed cases. Two confirmed TBE cases had definite or highly probable acquisition in the UK, in June and August 2022, respectively. One of the possible cases had definite UK acquisition. Cases typically have a biphasic presentation, with encephalitis in the second phase.ConclusionClinicians should be aware of the possibility of TBE when the cause for encephalitis is not identified, even in the absence of travel to previously identified endemic regions.

Pooled safety evaluation for a new single-shot live-attenuated chikungunya vaccine†

BACKGROUND

Chikungunya disease, caused by chikungunya virus (CHIKV), is associated with substantial morbidity, including debilitating CHIKV-related arthralgia.

METHODS

Three clinical trials of a CHIKV vaccine (VLA1553, IXCHIQ®) were conducted in the USA: a Phase 1 dose-finding trial, a pivotal Phase 3 trial and a Phase 3 lot-to-lot consistency trial. Participants were healthy adults (≥18 years) and received a single intramuscular dose of VLA1553 (3520 participants) or placebo (1033 participants). Solicited injection site and systemic adverse events (AEs) (10-14 days post-vaccination), unsolicited AEs (28 and 180 days post-vaccination), AEs of special interest (AESIs) (28 days post-vaccination), medically attended AEs (MAAEs), serious AEs (SAEs) (180 days post-vaccination) and pregnancies were evaluated. Safety data were pooled, and analyses were descriptive.

RESULTS

Overall, 63.7% of participants receiving VLA1553 experienced AEs (44.7% for placebo) that were generally mild. Solicited injection-site AEs, solicited systemic AEs and unsolicited (Day 29) AEs were reported by 15.5, 50.9 and 22.7% of participants who received VLA1553 and 11.1, 26.9 and 13.4% who received placebo. Arthralgia was reported by 16.7% of participants who received VLA1553 and 4.8% of participants who received placebo; none required medical attention. MAAEs, AESIs and SAEs were reported by 12.4, 0.3 and 1.5% of participants who received VLA1553 and 11.3, 0.1 and 0.8% of participants who received placebo. Protocol-defined AESIs were mild and short-lived, and two VLA1553-related SAEs resolved without sequelae. There were no clinically important differences in AE incidence based on age or medical history and no VLA1553-related adverse pregnancy outcomes. There were three deaths (two in the VLA1553 group and one in the placebo group); none was vaccine-related.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of VLA1553 presented with an excellent local tolerability profile and overall safety in line with that expected for a live-attenuated vaccine. The safety profile was comparable in participants aged 18-64 years and ≥65 years.

Skin dermatoses in the returning traveller: a practical guide

Skin problems are common in returning travellers, despite the fact that vaccination, insect repellent techniques, adequate clothing and footwear are all ways to prevent skin disease. When travelling to unusual areas, the traveller can still expect to pick up diseases that are common across the world, such as lice, scabies, and staphylococcal or streptococcal infections. What can differ are the different arthropods and the diseases they can spread. Given the plethora of dermatoses in returning travellers, a methodological approach is necessary. We attempted such an approach by creating a practical guide that includes a diagnostic flowchart alongside a world map presenting common skin problems by continent. Additional information regarding possible investigations, along with tables presenting common infectious skin diseases and their corresponding presentations, is also included in our study. Our aim is to help clinicians approach skin dermatosis in patients returning from holidays, acknowledging the diagnostic difficulties that this might entail.

Epidemiology of travel-associated dengue from 2007 to 2022: A GeoSentinel analysis

BACKGROUND

Dengue is a leading cause of febrile illness among international travellers. We aimed to describe the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of imported dengue in returning travellers evaluated at GeoSentinel sites from 2007 to 2022.

METHODS

We retrieved GeoSentinel records of dengue among travellers residing in non-endemic countries. We considered dengue confirmed when diagnosed by a positive dengue virus (DENV)-specific reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, positive NS-1 antigen and/or anti-DENV IgG seroconversion, and probable when diagnosed by single anti-DENV IgM or high-titre anti-DENV IgG detection. Severe dengue was defined as evidence of clinically significant plasma leakage or bleeding, organ failure, or shock, according to the 2009 World Health Organization guidance. Complicated dengue was defined as either severe dengue or dengue with presence of any warning sign. Analyses were descriptive.

RESULTS

This analysis included 5958 travellers with confirmed (n = 4859; 81.6%) or probable (n = 1099; 18.4%) dengue. The median age was 33 years (range: <1-91); 3007 (50.5%) travellers were female. The median travel duration was 21 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 15-32). The median time between illness onset and GeoSentinel site visit was 7 days (IQR: 4-15). The most frequent reasons for travel were tourism (67.3%), visiting friends or relatives (12.2%) and business (11.0%). The most frequent regions of acquisition were South East Asia (50.4%), South Central Asia (14.9%), the Caribbean (10.9%) and South America (9.2%). Ninety-five (1.6%) travellers had complicated dengue, of whom 27 (0.5%) had severe dengue and one died. Of 2710 travellers with data available, 724 (26.7%) were hospitalized. The largest number of cases (n = 835) was reported in 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

A broad range of international travellers should be aware of the risk of acquiring dengue and receive appropriate pre-travel counselling regarding preventive measures. Prospective cohort studies are needed to further elucidate dengue risk by destination and over time, as well as severe outcomes and prolonged morbidity (long dengue) due to travel-related dengue.

Histoplasma capsulatum as a cause for prolonged pulmonary illness in an immunocompetent returning traveller from Bangladesh

Fungal infections can be challenging to diagnose in returning travellers due to their non-specific clinical manifestations and changing epidemiology. We present a case of progressive disseminated histoplasmosis in a returning traveller from Bangladesh. The patient had a progressive and prolonged respiratory illness necessitating mechanical ventilatory support. The clue to potential fungal aetiology was provided by serum fungal markers - 1-3-β-D-glucan and Aspergillus galactomannan. Diagnosis was eventually made using panfungal PCR on bronchioalveolar lavage fluid.

The Ready-To-Go Questionnaire predicts health outcomes during travel: a smartphone application-based analysis

BACKGROUND

The Ready-To-Go (R2G) Questionnaire is a tool for rapid assessment of health risks for travel consultation. This study aims to assess the utility of the R2G Questionnaire in identifying high-risk travellers and predicting health events and behaviour during travel in the TOURIST2 prospective cohort.

METHODS

TOURIST2 data were used to calculate the R2G medical and travel risk scores and categorize each participant based on their risk. The TOURIST2 study enrolled 1000 participants from Switzerland's largest travel clinics between 2017 and 2019. Participants completed daily smartphone application surveys before, during and after travel on health events and behaviours. We used regression models to analyse incidence of overall health events and of similar health events grouped into health domains (e.g. respiratory, gastrointestinal, accident/injury). Incidence rate ratios (IRR) are displayed with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

R2G high-risk travellers experienced significantly greater incidence of health events compared to lower-risk travellers (IRR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.22-1.33). Both the medical and travel scores showed significant positive associations with incidence of health events during travel (IRR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07-1.16; IRR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.03-1.12, respectively), with significant increases in all health domains except skin disorders. Medical and travel risk scores were associated with different patterns in behaviour. Travellers with chronic health conditions accessed medical care during travel more often (IRR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.03-1.31), had greater difficulty in carrying out planned activities (IRR = -0.04, 95% CI: -0.05, -0.02), and rated their travel experience lower (IRR = -0.04, 95% CI: -0.06, -0.02). Travellers with increased travel-related risks due to planned travel itinerary had more frequent animal contact (IRR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.18) and accidents/injuries (IRR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.15-1.44).

CONCLUSIONS

The R2G Questionnaire is a promising risk assessment tool that offers a timesaving and reliable means to identify high-risk travellers. Incorporated into travel medicine websites, it could serve as a pre-consultation triage to help travellers self-identify their risk level, direct them to the appropriate medical provider(s), and help practitioners in giving more tailored advice.