Tissue-specific chromatin structure of the phenobarbital-responsive unit and proximal promoter of CYP2B1/2 and modulation by phenobarbital

Histone deacetylase inhibitors induce cytochrome P450 2B by activating nuclear receptor constitutive androstane receptor

Valproic acid, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, induces the cytochrome P450 2B subfamily. However, the effects of HDAC inhibitors on CYP2B induction are still not fully understood. Nuclear receptor constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) is a key regulator of CYP2B induction. In this study, we investigated the effect of HDAC inhibitors on CAR-mediated CYP2B induction. The expression of CYP2B6 mRNA was induced in HepG2 cells stably expressing mouse CAR (Ym17) by HDAC inhibitors including valproic acid, phenylbutyrate, and trichostatin A. HDAC inhibitors activated the phenobarbital-responsive enhancer module of the CYP2B6 promoter in transient transfection reporter assays with Ym17 cells. Furthermore, HDAC inhibitors synergistically augmented the effect of the CAR ligand, 1,4-bis[2-(3,5-dichloropyridyloxy)]benzene, in the transactivation of CYP2B6 mRNA and the promoter assay in Ym17 cells. Intraperitoneal injection of HDAC inhibitors induced Cyp2b10 mRNA in wild-type mice. However, such induction was not observed in CAR(-/-) mice. Immunoprecipitation demonstrated that CAR formed a complex with HDACs. HDAC inhibitors diminished the binding between CAR and HDAC1 and augmented the binding of steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) to CAR. Furthermore, small interfering RNA knockdown of HDAC1 increased CYP2B6 mRNA expression. These results provide novel insight into the mechanism by which HDAC inhibitors affect gene expression of CYP2B6. HDAC inhibitors have the potential to up-regulate CYP2B6 through the dissociation of HDAC1 and recruitment of SRC-1 to receptor CAR.

Induction of cytochrome P4502B: Role of regulatory elements and nuclear receptors

Cytochrome P450 of the 2B subfamily is easily induced by many xenobiotics. In spite of intensive investigations, the molecular mechanisms of regulation of the CYP2B genes are not clear. The nuclear receptor CAR is shown to play a crucial role in the activation of CYP2B genes by xenobiotics, but many problems of CAR activation in different animal species and humans remain unsolved. This review focuses on signaling pathways involved in the control of CYP2B gene expression in mammals.

Analysis of multiple nuclear receptor binding sites for CAR/RXR in the phenobarbital responsive unit of CYP2B2

The phenobarbital (PB) responsive enhancers in CYP2B genes contain a core of two direct repeat-4 nuclear receptor binding sites, NR-1 and NR-2, which flank an NF-1 site and appear to be most important for PB responsiveness. Additional sequences outside the core are required for maximal PB responsiveness, including a third direct repeat-4 site, NR-3. The PB response is mediated by constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) which binds as a CAR/RXR heterodimer to the NR sites. To determine the relative importance of the third NR site, each of the NR sites was mutated individually and in all combinations in the rat PB responsive unit (PBRU). Mutation of NR-3 resulted in similar effects on transactivation of the PBRU by CAR in HepG2 cells as did mutations of NR-1 and NR-2. The recruitment of GRIP1/SRC-2 by CAR/RXR to the PBRU assessed by gel shift assays was cooperatively enhanced if more than one NR site in the PBRU was occupied by CAR/RXR. NR-3 in combination with NR-1 or NR-2 was equal to NR-1 and NR-2 in mediating this cooperative recruitment. Recruitment of SRC-1 and GRIP1/SRC-2 was similar for all NR sites, while some selectivity of NR-1 for SRC-3 was observed. SRC-3 also exhibited CAR-independent activation of the PBRU in HepG2 cells. Micrococcal nuclease mapping of nucleosomes revealed that the NR-1/NR-2 core of the PBRU is present in a nucleosome while NR-3 is present in the linker adjacent to the nucleosome. In the linear sequence NR-3 is further from NR-1 than NR-2 is, but in a nucleosomal structure, NR-3 is well positioned for cooperative recruitment of GRIP1/SRC-2 by CAR/RXR that is bound to NR-3 and either NR-1 or NR-2, while NR-1 and NR-2 are on opposite sides of the nucleosome separated by the histone core. These results demonstrate that NR-3 is functionally similar to NR-1 and NR-2 in CAR transactivation of the PBRU in vitro and suggest that NR-3 may have a greater role in a chromatin context in vivo than is apparent from transient transfection studies.

Role of an mSin3A-Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling complex in the feedback repression of bile acid biosynthesis by SHP

The orphan receptor SHP interacts with many nuclear receptors and inhibits their transcriptional activities. SHP is central to feedback repression of cholesterol 7alpha hydroxylase gene (CYP7A1) expression by bile acids, which is critical for maintaining cholesterol homeostasis. Using CYP7A1 as a model system, we studied the molecular mechanisms of SHP repression at the level of native chromatin. Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies showed that mSin3A and a Swi/Snf complex containing Brm as a central ATPase were recruited to the promoter. This recruitment was associated with chromatin remodeling after bile acid treatment that was blunted by inhibition of the endogenous Swi/Snf function by dominant-negative ATPase mutants. Biochemical studies indicated that SHP was associated with the mSin3A-Swi/Snf complex by direct interaction with Brm and mSin3A through its repression domain. Expression of Brm, but not an ATPase mutant, inhibited CYP7A1 promoter activity and further enhanced SHP-mediated repression. Bile acid-induced recruitment of mSin3A/Brm, chromatin remodeling, and concomitant repression of endogenous CYP7A1 expression were impaired when SHP expression was inhibited by SHP small interfering RNA. Our results suggest that SHP mediates recruitment of mSin3A-Swi/Snf to the CYP7A1 promoter, resulting in chromatin remodeling and gene repression, which may also be a mechanism for the repression by SHP of genes activated by many nuclear receptors. Our study establishes the first link between a Swi/Snf complex and regulation of cholesterol metabolism.

CAR, Driving into the Future

The nuclear orphan receptor CAR is active in the absence of ligand with the unique capability to be further regulated by activators. A number of these activators, including phenobarbital, do not directly bind to the receptor. Considered a xenobiotic sensing receptor, CAR transcriptionally modifies the expression of genes involved in the metabolism and elimination of xenobiotics and steroids in response to these compounds and other cellular metabolites. Its hepatic expression pattern endows the liver with the ability to protect against not only exogenous but also endogenous insults. The mechanism of CAR activation is complex, involving translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in the presence of activators, followed by further activation steps in the nucleus. Although this mechanism remains under investigation, we have summarized here the cellular signaling pathways elucidated so far and speculate on the mechanism by which CAR activators regulate gene expression through this network.

Induction of drug metabolism: the role of nuclear receptors

Induction of drug metabolism was described more than 40 years ago. Progress in understanding the molecular mechanism of induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes was made recently when the important roles of the pregnane X receptor (PXR) and the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), two members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of transcription factors, were discovered to act as sensors for lipophilic xenobiotics, including drugs. CAR and PXR bind as heterodimeric complexes with the retinoid X receptor to response elements in the regulatory regions of the induced genes. PXR is directly activated by xenobiotic ligands, whereas CAR is involved in a more complex and less well understood mechanism of signal transduction triggered by drugs. Most recently, analysis of these xenobiotic-sensing nuclear receptors and their nonmammalian precursors such as the chicken xenobiotic receptor suggests an important role of PXR and CAR also in endogenous pathways, such as cholesterol and bile acid biosynthesis and metabolism. In this review, recent findings regarding xenosensors and their target genes are summarized and are put into an evolutionary perspective in regard to how a living organism has derived a system that is able to deal with potentially toxic compounds it has not encountered before.

Phenobarbital response elements of cytochrome P450 genes and nuclear receptors

Phenobarbital (PB) response elements are composed of various nuclear receptor (NR)-binding sites. A 51-bp distal element PB-responsive enhancer module (PBREM) conserved in the PB-inducible CYP2B genes contains two NR-binding direct repeat (DR)-4 motifs. Responding to PB exposure in liver, the NR constitutive active receptor (CAR) translocates to the nucleus, forms a dimer with the retinoid X receptor (RXR), and activates PBREM via binding to DR-4 motifs. For CYP3A genes, a common NR site [DR-3 or everted repeat (ER)-6] is present in proximal promoter regions. In addition, the distal element called the xenobiotic responsive module (XREM) is found in human CYP3A4 genes, which contain both DR-3 and ER-6 motifs. Pregnane X receptor (PXR) could bind to all of these sites and, upon PB induction, a PXR:RXR heterodimer could transactivate XREM. These response elements and NRs are functionally versatile, and capable of responding to distinct but overlapping groups of xenochemicals.

Xenobiotic induction of cytochrome P450 2B1 (CYP2B1) is mediated by the orphan nuclear receptor constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and requires steroid co-activator 1 (SRC-1) and the transcription factor Sp1

The constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activates the expression of a reporter gene attached to the phenobarbital-response element (PBRE) of the cytochrome P450 2B1 (CYP2B1) gene in response to the barbiturate phenobarbital and the plant product picrotoxin. The xenobiotic-mediated increase in transactivation occurs in transfected primary hepatocytes and in liver transfected by biolistic-particle-mediated DNA transfer, but not in the transformed cell lines HepG2, CV-1 and HeLa, which support only constitutive activation of gene expression by CAR. Steroid co-activator 1 (SRC-1) enhances both constitutive and xenobiotic-induced CAR-mediated transactivation via the CYP2B1 PBRE in transfected primary hepatocytes. The nuclear receptor 1 (NR1) site of the PBRE is sufficient for CAR-mediated transactivation, but additional sequences within the PBRE, and hence the proteins that bind to them, are required for the interaction of CAR with SRC-1. The NR2 site of the PBRE binds proteins other than CAR, including an unidentified nuclear receptor heterodimerized with retinoid X receptor alpha. By binding to the proximal promoter of CYP2B1, the transcription factor Sp1 increases both basal transcription and xenobiotic-induced expression via the PBRE. Thus induction of CYP2B1 expression by xenobiotics is mediated by the nuclear receptor CAR and, for optimal expression, requires SRC-1 and Sp1.

Chromatin assembly enhances binding to the CYP2B1 phenobarbital-responsive unit (PBRU) of nuclear factor-1, which binds simultaneously with constitutive androstane receptor (CAR)/retinoid X receptor (RXR) and enhances CAR/RXR-mediated activation of the PBRU

Phenobarbital induction of CYP2B genes is mediated by a complex phenobarbital-responsive enhancer (PBRU), which contains a binding site for nuclear factor-1 (NF-1) flanked by two DR-4 nuclear receptor (NR) binding sites for a heterodimer of constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and retinoid X receptor (RXR). To examine potential interactions between NF-1 and CAR/RXR, binding of purified recombinant proteins to DNA, or to chromatin assembled using Drosophila embryo extract, was examined. NF-1 and CAR/RXR bound simultaneously and independently to the overlapping NF-1 and NR-1 sites; binding of CAR/RXR to the NR-2 site was modestly increased by NF-1 binding; and CAR/RXR bound to a new site in the PBRU region, designated NR-3. Assembly of plasmid DNA into chromatin using Drosophila extract resulted in linearly phased nucleosomes in the PBRU region. The apparent binding affinity of NF-1 was increased by about 10-fold in assembled chromatin compared with DNA, whereas CAR/RXR binding was decreased. As observed for DNA, however, simultaneous, largely independent, binding to the NF-1 and NR sites was observed. CAR-mediated transactivation of the PBRU in cultured cells of hepatic origin was inhibited by mutations in the NF-1 site, and overexpression of NF-1 increased CAR transactivation in HepG2 cells. These studies demonstrate that NF-1 and CAR/RXR can both bind to the PBRU at the same time and that chromatin assembly increases NF-1 binding, which is consistent with previous in vivo footprinting studies in which the NF-1 site was occupied in untreated animals and the NF-1 and flanking NR sites were occupied after phenobarbital treatment. CAR-mediated trans-activation of the PBRU was increased by NF-1, analogous to NF-1 effects on phenobarbital induction in previous transient transfection studies and consistent with mediation of phenobarbital induction by CAR.

Mutational analysis of the CYP2B2 phenobarbital response unit and inhibitory effect of the constitutive androstane receptor on phenobarbital responsiveness

A 163-base pair enhancer in the CYP2B2 5' flank confers phenobarbital (PB) inducibility and constitutes a PB response unit (PBRU). By transfection of primary hepatocytes, we analyzed the function of elements comprising the PBRU and evaluated the role of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) in PB responsiveness. A 51-base pair PB-responsive enhancer module (PBREM) within the PBRU confers near-maximal PB response when fused to a tk promoter. However, replacing the PBRU with the PBREM in the CYP2B2 5' flank in the natural sequence context reduced PB responsiveness by approximately 4-fold. Mutational analysis also demonstrated that PBRU sequence elements outside the PBREM are essential for maximal PB responsiveness. The PBRU contains two putative nuclear receptor binding sites, NR1 and NR2. CAR binds to retinoic acid beta2 response elements (betaRARE) and to the NR1 and NR2 sites of the PBRU and activates transcription of reporter genes in cell lines. However, conversion of NR1 into betaRARE was the equivalent of an inactivating mutation, indicating that CAR does not activate PB-dependent transcription via NR1 in the natural sequence context. A betaRAREx2-tk reporter construct was inducible by all-trans-retinoic acid (at-RA) as expected and also responded to PB. The latter can be attributed to nuclear accumulation of CAR after PB exposure. Exogenous CAR increased both the basal and PB-induced response of betaRAREx2-tk but reduced PBRU-dependent PB response. Furthermore, exogenous CAR also reduced the at-RA response of the betaRAREx2-tk construct. Thus, CAR acts negatively on PB responsiveness mediated by the CYP2B2 PBRU just as it prevents maximal at-RA responsiveness mediated by betaRARE.