Lipoprotein(a) in patients with proteinuria

Elevated Llpoprotein(A) and Fibrinogen Serum Levels Increase the Cardiovascular Risk in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Objective

To analyze the relationship between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and fibrinogen as potential cardiovascular risk factors in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).

Patients

A total of 47 uremic patients receiving CAPD, 21 with coronary artery disease (CAD), 26 without CAD.

Measurements

Lp(a) levels were determined by an immunoradiometric assay. Since Lp(a) serum concentrations vary depending on the size, apoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoforms were determined (Westernblot). Fibrinogen was quantified according to Clauss.

Results

The mean Lp(a) serum concentration was 43 ± 5 mg/dL (SEM) (median 33 mg/dL) in CAPD patients and 21 ± 2 mg/dL (8 mg/dL) in controls (p < 0.01). Patients with low molecular weight apo(a) isoforms exhibited substantially elevated Lp(a) levels when compared with patients with high molecular isoforms (p < 0.01). In addition, we found elevated fibrinogen levels in the CAPD patients (538 ± 61 mg/dL) compared with healthy controls (288 ± 46 mg/dL). Twenty-one CAPD patients (45%) were suffering from CAD. Patients with CAD had higher Lp(a) levels (54 ± 5 mg/dL vs 34 ± 4 mg/dL) as well as higher fibrinogen concentrations (628 ± 59 mg/dL vs 459 ± 46 mg/dL). Furthermore, a positive correlation between the fibrinogen levels and the Lp(a) serum concentration was observed (r = 0.45, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

We suggest that elevated Lp(a) levels are influenced by the allelic variation of the apo(a) isoform. In addition to the typical dyslipidemia found in CAPD patients, high levels of Lp(a) and fibrinogen may contribute to the elevated risk of coronary artery disease and other cardiovascular complications.

Lipoprotein (a): impact by ethnicity and environmental and medical conditions

Levels of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], a complex between an LDL-like lipid moiety containing one copy of apoB, and apo(a), a plasminogen-derived carbohydrate-rich hydrophilic protein, are primarily genetically regulated. Although stable intra-individually, Lp(a) levels have a skewed distribution inter-individually and are strongly impacted by a size polymorphism of the LPA gene, resulting in a variable number of kringle IV (KIV) units, a key motif of apo(a). The variation in KIV units is a strong predictor of plasma Lp(a) levels resulting in stable plasma levels across the lifespan. Studies have demonstrated pronounced differences across ethnicities with regard to Lp(a) levels and some of this difference, but not all of it, can be explained by genetic variations across ethnic groups. Increasing evidence suggests that age, sex, and hormonal impact may have a modest modulatory influence on Lp(a) levels. Among clinical conditions, Lp(a) levels are reported to be affected by kidney and liver diseases.

Serum Lp(a) in diabetics with and without evidence of clinical nephropathy-A preliminary study

Type 2 diabetes is associated with a marked increase in the risk of coronary artery disease. Dyslipidaemia is believed to be a major cause of this increased risk. Recently, elevated levels of lipoprotein (a), Lp(a), have been reported to be associated with an increased risk. However there is very little data regarding Lp(a) concentrations and type 2 diabetes from India. The objective of the study was to assess serum Lp(a) levels in type 2 diabetics with and with out evidence of clinical nephropathy. We estimated serum Lp(a) levels in 30 control subjects, 30 diabetics without evidence of clinical nephropathy and 30 diabetics with evidence of clinical nephropathy. Statistical analysis showed that Lp(a) levels were increased in diabetic patients with nephropathy (mean 46.3±17.6 mg/dl). The Lp(a) levels however did not differ significantly between control (mean 20.2±15.9 mg/dl) and diabetics without nephropathy (mean 22.6±13.1mg/dl). Thus diabetes per se seems to have little or no influence on serum Lp(a) levels, however elevated levels were seen in patients with nephropathy.

Lipoprotein(a)- and low-density lipoprotein-derived cholesterol in nephrotic syndrome: Impact on lipid-lowering therapy?

BACKGROUND

Patients with nephrotic syndrome have the highest lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations known. Lp(a) is an low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle consisting of 45% cholesterol. The usual methods to determine LDL cholesterol do not distinguish between cholesterol derived from LDL and Lp(a) and are thus the net result of cholesterol levels from both lipoproteins. High Lp(a) concentrations therefore significantly contribute to the measured or calculated LDL cholesterol levels. Since statins have no influence on Lp(a) levels, it can be expected that the LDL cholesterol-lowering effect of statins may be diminished in patients who have a pronounced elevation of Lp(a) levels accompanied by only moderate elevations of LDL cholesterol.

METHODS

We investigated 207 patients with nondiabetic nephrotic syndrome in whom Lp(a) concentrations were strikingly elevated when compared to 274 controls (60.4 +/- 85.4 mg/dL vs. 20.0 +/- 32.8 mg/dL, P < 0.0001).

RESULTS

According to National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Managing Dyslipidemias, almost 95% of these patients are candidates for a therapeutic intervention to lower LDL cholesterol. LDL cholesterol levels corrected for Lp(a)-derived cholesterol, however, were 27 mg/dL lower than uncorrected concentrations (compared to only 9 mg/dL in controls). If Lp(a)-corrected levels instead of total LDL cholesterol levels were used, 25.7% of patients with low-molecular-weight (LMW) apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoforms were classified no longer to be in need of LDL cholesterol-lowering therapeutic intervention compared to only 2.3% of patients with high-molecular-weight (HMW) apo(a) phenotypes (P < 0.00001). This ("pseudo") pharmacogenetic effect results in incorrect determination of LDL cholesterol.

CONCLUSION

Our observation has an impact on the indication for, and assessment of efficacy of intervention. This potential artifact should be investigated in ongoing large trials in renal patients as well as in nonrenal African American subjects who have on average markedly higher Lp(a) levels. In nonrenal Caucasian subjects with much lower Lp(a) concentrations, this issue will be less relevant.

The apolipoprotein(a) size polymorphism is associated with nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

The atherogenic serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is significantly elevated in patients with nephrotic syndrome. The underlying mechanism for this elevation is poorly understood.

METHODS

We investigated in 207 patients with nondiabetic nephrotic syndrome and 274 controls whether the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] kringle-IV repeat polymorphism explains the elevated Lp(a) levels in these patients.

RESULTS

Patients showed a tremendous elevation of Lp(a) concentrations when compared to controls (mean 60.4 vs. 20.0 mg/dL and median 29.8 vs. 6.4 mg/dL, P < 0.0001). Primary and secondary causes contributed to this elevation. The primary causes became apparent by a markedly elevated number of low-molecular-weight apo(a) phenotypes which are usually associated with high Lp(a) levels. This frequency was 35.7% in patients compared to only 24.8% in controls (P= 0.009). In addition, secondary causes by the pathogenetic mechanisms of the nephrotic syndrome itself resulted in a different increase of Lp(a) in the various apo(a) isoform groups. Based on the measured Lp(a) concentrations in each subject, we calculated separately the Lp(a) concentrations arising from the two expressed isoforms by estimating the relative proportion of the two serum isoforms in the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) agarose gel electrophoresis. Low-molecular-weight isoforms were associated with 40% to 75% elevated Lp(a) concentrations when compared to matched isoforms from controls. High-molecular-weight apo(a) isoforms showed 100% to 500% elevated Lp(a) levels compared to matched isoforms from controls. The severity of the nephrotic syndrome as well as the degree of renal impairment did not influence the Lp(a) concentrations.

CONCLUSION

The tremendously increased Lp(a) levels in nephrotic syndrome ar caused by primary genetic as well as disease-related mechanisms.

Association of kidney function with serum lipoprotein(a) level: the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1991-1994)

BACKGROUND

Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels have been observed in patients on dialysis therapy. However, few studies explored the relationship between kidney function and Lp(a) levels in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

We examined the association of estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with Lp(a) level in 7,675 participants in the second phase of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

RESULTS

There was no association between Lp(a) level and estimated GFR in the overall sample (geometric mean, 10.4 mg/dL [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.2 to 11.8] in the group with a GFR of 90 to 149 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus 9.3 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.9 to 11.0] in the group with a GFR of 60 to 89 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus 12.1 mg/dL [95% CI, 9.0 to 15.9] in the group with a GFR of 15 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.77 for linear trend) or non-Hispanic whites (geometric mean, 8.9 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.8 to 10.2] versus 8.5 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.1 to 10.2] versus 10.9 mg/dL [95% CI, 8.1 to 14.7]; P = 0.54 for linear trend). However, non-Hispanic blacks (geometric mean, 30.4 mg/dL [95% CI, 28.0 to 33.0] versus 35.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 31.4 to 39.4] versus 40.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 27.7 to 58.2]; P = 0.01 for linear trend) and Mexican Americans (geometric mean, 6.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 5.3 to 7.2] versus 7.4 mg/dL [95% CI, 6.4 to 8.5] versus 11.0 mg/dL [95% CI, 5.7 to 20.3]; P = 0.04 for linear trend) showed modestly, but significantly, greater Lp(a) levels with lower GFRs. In a weighed quantile regression model adjusted for age, sex, and race, a lower GFR was associated with greater 95th percentile serum Lp(a) values in the overall sample and non-Hispanic whites and with greater median Lp(a) levels in Mexican Americans.

CONCLUSION

In a cross-section of the US population, a low GFR is associated with only moderately greater Lp(a) levels, and this association may differ by race-ethnicity.

Impact of apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes on long-term renal transplant survival

The long-term success of renal transplantation is limited because of chronic rejection (CR), which shows histologic parallels to atherosclerosis. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, but its role in CR has not been investigated. Plasma levels of Lp(a) are determined mainly by the inherited isoform (phenotype) of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] and show an inverse correlation with the molecular weight of apo(a). Apo(a) isoforms were identified in frozen sera of 327 patients who received a renal transplant during 1982 to 1992. Long-term graft survival in recipients with high molecular weight (HMW) or low molecular weight (LMW) apo(a) phenotypes were compared retrospectively. Mean (95% confidence interval) transplant survival was 12.8 yr (range, 11.9 to 13.6 yr) in patients with HMW and 11.9 yr (range, 10.8 to 13.1 yr) in patients with LMW apo(a) phenotypes (P = 0.2065). In patients who were 35 yr or younger at the time of transplantation, mean transplant survival was more than 3 yr longer in recipients with HMW apo(a) phenotypes compared with those with LMW apo(a) phenotypes (13.2 yr [range, 12.1 to 14.4 yr] versus 9.9 yr (range, 8.5 to 11.5 yr); P = 0.0156). In a Cox's proportional hazards regression model, the presence of LMW phenotypes-but not gender, immunosuppression, or HLA mismatches-in young patients was associated with a statistically significant risk of CR (P = 0.0434). These retrospective data indicate that young renal transplant recipients with LMW apo(a) phenotypes have a significantly shorter long-term graft survival, regardless of the number of HLA mismatches, gender, or immunosuppressive treatment.

Are lipid-dependent indicators of cardiovascular risk affected by renal transplantation?

Hyperlipoproteinemia has been reported to frequently occur in kidney transplanted patients, thus possibly explaining, at least in part, the increased incidence of cardiovascular disease in this population. To evaluate the impact of renal transplantation (Tx), and related immunosuppressive therapy, on plasma lipoprotein and Lp(a) profile, we selected a cohort of kidney transplanted patients (36 M/14 F; age 33.8 + 12.0 yr, range 13-62) lacking significant causes of hyperlipidemia. All patients received a triple immunosuppressive regimen and showed a stable renal function after Tx (plasma creatinine: 1.36 +/- 0.35 mg/dL). One year after Tx, we found a significant increase of total cholesterol (TC), LDL, HDL, ApoB and ApoA-I (p < 0.005), while plasma triglyceride levels remained unmodified. Lp(a) plasma levels after Tx were within the normal range and displayed a significant inverse relationship with apo(a) size. Noteworthy, LDL/HDL ratio and ApoB/ ApoA-I ratio in kidney transplanted patients were almost superimposable with those of normal controls. Specifically, LDL/HDL ratio significantly decreased in 64% of patients after Tx, due to a prevalent increase of HDL, and was associated with a moderate amelioration of plasma TG. In a multiple linear regression model, post-Tx HDL level was significantly related to recipient's age, gender, BMI and cyclosporine (CyA) trough levels (Adj-R2 = 0.35, p = 0.0002), with gender and CyA trough levels being the better predictors of HDL. In conclusion, immunosuppressive regimens, in themselves, do not appear to significantly increase the atherogenic risk related to lipoproteins. Rather, other factors can affect the lipoprotein profile and its vascular effects in renal transplant recipients.

Lipoprotein(a) stimulates growth of human mesangial cells and induces activation of phospholipase C via pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins

BACKGROUND

Renal disease is commonly associated with hyperlipidemia and correlates with glomerular accumulation of atherogenic lipoproteins, for example, lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], and mesangial hypercellularity. Specific binding of Lp(a) to mesangial cells and induction of c-myc and c-fos expression has been demonstrated. Therefore, in this study, we investigated a possible growth stimulatory effect and mode of action of Lp(a) in human mesangial cells.

METHODS

Lp(a) was purified from the regenerate fluid of a dextran sulfate column-based low-density lipoprotein apheresis system. Human mesangial cells were isolated by a sequential sieving technique from patients undergoing tumor nephrectomy. DNA synthesis was measured by [3H]-thymidine incorporation. The intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) was determined by Fura 2-fluorescence, and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (1,4,5-IP3) concentration was measured by a radioreceptor assay.

RESULTS

The data show that Lp(a) bound to the cells with a Kd of 17.0 micrograms/ml and increased DNA synthesis and cell proliferation. Lp(a) caused a rapid increase in 1,4,5-IP3 and [Ca2+]i via a pertussis toxin-sensitive mechanism. The phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor U73122 abolished Lp(a)-induced cell proliferation. In contrast, vasopressin-induced increase in 1,4,5-IP3 and [Ca2+]i was pertussis toxin insensitive.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that Lp(a) stimulates growth of human mesangial cells. Lp(a)-induced signaling involves binding to a receptor and stimulation of PLC via Gi proteins. Stimulation of PLC appears to be essential for the growth stimulatory effect of Lp(a). Whether these effects of Lp(a) contribute to the pathophysiology of renal disease needs to be determined.

Urinary apolipoprotein (a) excretion in patients with proteinuria

Increased plasma lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) levels are strongly associated with premature cardiovascular disease and stroke. Recently we, as well as other groups, found that apolipoprotein (a) (apo(a)) fragments appear in the urine of healthy individuals, and that renal transplant patients with impaired renal function excrete fewer apo(a) fragments into their urine compared with controls. As the excretion mode of apo(a) is presently unknown, we determined plasma Lp(a) levels and urinary apo(a) excretion in relation to kidney function in 58 proteinuric patients and 58 healthy controls. For the first time, urinary apo(a) excretion was related to apo(a) isoforms. Plasma Lp(a) values were higher in the proteinuric patients compared with the controls, independent of their renal function. The patients with low-molecular-weight apo(a) isoforms had higher Lp(a) plasma levels, whereas the patients with high-molecular-weight apo(a) isoforms had lower Lp(a) plasma levels. Urinary apo(a) showed a very similar pattern to that of plasma Lp(a), being significantly higher in patients with low-molecular-weight isoforms as compared with patients with high-molecular-weight isoforms. Urinary apo(a) excretion was significantly decreased in the patient group when compared with healthy controls. There was a close correlation (P < 0.001) between the plasma Lp(a) and urinary apo(a) excretion in both the patient group and the control group. Urinary apo(a) excretion did not correlate with protein excretion, creatinine clearance or plasma creatinine levels. We conclude that urinary apo(a) excretion correlates with plasma Lp(a) and Lp(a) isoforms, and that proteinuric patients excrete significantly less apo(a) into their urine than healthy controls, a factor that might contribute to increased plasma Lp(a) levels in these patients.

Decreased urinary apolipoprotein (a) excretion in patients with impaired renal function

BACKGROUND

Plasma lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels are elevated in patients with kidney disease and are strongly associated with premature cardiovascular disease and stroke.

METHODS

As the kidney is suggested to play an important role in apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)] catabolism and as apo(a) fragments appear in urine, we determined plasma Lp(a) levels and urinary apo(a) excretion in relation to kidney function in a large cohort of renal patients. A total of 368 renal patients with normal or different degrees of impaired renal function and 163 healthy control subjects matched for age and sex were investigated. Plasma Lp(a) and urinary apo(a) were analysed immunochemically.

RESULTS

Renal patients were found to have significantly elevated total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-C values but lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-C values than control subjects. Plasma Lp(a) values were significantly higher only in patients with creatinine clearance < 70 mL min-1. There was a significant correlation between urinary apo(a) and plasma Lp(a) in patients and control subjects. Urinary apo(a) excretion was significantly lower in patients than in control subjects and showed no correlation with urinary protein excretion.

CONCLUSION

Although it is unlikely that impaired renal excretion of apo(a) fragments largely contributes to increased plasma Lp(a) levels in patients suffering from impaired kidney function, these data suggest that urinary apo(a) excretion is significantly decreased in renal patients and that this might contribute to increased plasma Lp(a) levels in this patient group.

Role of dyslipidemia in the progression of chronic renal disease

The connection between lipids and the rate of progression of chronic renal disease was retrospectively examined in 70 patients who were divided into 2 groups according to their baseline creatinine clearance (CCr): Group 1 (Gp1) contained 30 patients with CCr 60-40 mL/min followed for 40.0 +/- 13.3 months; Group 2 (G2) contained 40 patients with CCr 39-15 mL/min followed for 39.0 +/- 18.2 months. The following parameters were considered: basal and final CCr proteinuria per unit of CCr (UProt/CCr); the difference between final and basal UProt/CCr (delta UProt/CCr); the change in CCr/month (delta CCr); baseline triglycerides (TG), total (TC), HDL (HDLC) and LDL (LDLC) cholesterol, Apo AI, Apo B, Lp(a). Besides in basal CCr the 2 groups significantly differed in the final CCr, final UProt/CCr, delta UProt/CCr, delta CCr. No differences were observed concerning lipid parameters except for Lp(a) (G1 14.8 +/- 13.6, G2 28.7 +/- 27.4 mg/dL; p < 0.05). Baseline TG (G1 184.1 +/- 61.3, G2 187.5 +/- 72.1 mg/dL) and Apo B (only G2 1.05 +/- 0.32 g/L) were significantly higher than normal subjects and the Apo AI/Apo B ratio (G1 1.42 +/- 0.43, G2 1.33 +/- 0.45) were significantly lower than in normal subjects. delta CCr, while inversely correlated in both groups with delta UProt/CCr (p < 0.01), only in G2 did it correlate directly with the Apo AI/Apo B ratio (p < 0.05) and inversely with Apo B and LDLC (p < 0.05). Although a correlation between Lp(a) and delta CCr was not found, 20/22 patients (3/5 G1, 17/17 G2) with a level > 30 mg% ran a progressive course. A natural progression of CRI, heralded by an increasing UProt, is highly frequent when baseline CCr is < 40 mL/min; only then lipids seem to add a burden to the renal damage.

ACE inhibitors and proteinuria

This review discusses the clinical consequences of urinary protein loss and the effects of inhibitors of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) on this clinical finding. Proteinuria appears to be an important risk factor for renal function deterioration and for cardiovascular mortality. ACE inhibitors have been shown to reduce proteinuria more effectively than other antihypertensives. Their antiproteinuric effect seems to be independent of the underlying renal disease, and is mediated by a specific, not yet fully elucidated mechanism. Urinary protein loss related phenomena, such as hypoalbuminemia and aberrant lipoprotein profile, tend to improve also during ACE inhibitor treatment. Furthermore, ACE inhibition has been shown to prevent the renal function deterioration that is frequently observed in patients with renal disease. Interestingly, it has recently been shown that in proteinuric patients with renal disease the initial proteinuria lowering response to ACE inhibition predicts long-term renal function outcome during this treatment the more proteinuna is lowered during the first months, the better renal function will be preserved over the following years. Because of these favorable effects ACE inhibitors have become a widely used class of agents in nephrology. They are not only prescribed for lowering blood pressure in the hypertensive renal patient, but also as symptomatic treatment of patients with proteinuria, and to prevent renal function loss in patients with both diabetic and non-diabetic renal disease.

Fibrinogen, coagulation factor VII, tissue plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and lipid as cardiovascular risk factors in chronic hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients

Mortality rates associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) are high in long-term dialysis patients. Increased levels of plasma fibrinogen (FBG), coagulation factor VII (FVII), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) as well as hyperlipidemia are regarded as important risk factors for CVD. To investigate whether there are differences in the risk of CVD between chronic hemodialysis (HD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients, serum lipid levels and plasma FBG, FVII, t-PA, and PAI-1 levels were measured in 17 patients on HD and 17 patients on CAPD. FBG was measured by the thrombin time method, FVII activity (FVIIc) by the chromogenic prothrombin time method, and t-PA and PAI-1 activity by the chromogenic substrate assay. No difference was found in body mass index (BMI) between HD and CAPD patients. Total cholesterol (TC), TC/high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-C ratio, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-C, and triglycerides (TG) were significantly increased, and HDL-C was significantly decreased in CAPD patients compared with HD patients. FBG and FVIIc were significantly elevated in CAPD patients compared with controls or HD patients. T-PA activities were significantly higher in HD and CAPD patients than in controls. CAPD patients showed significantly higher PAI-1 activities than controls or HD patients. Significant positive correlations were found between FBG or FVIIc and TC, between FBG and LDL-C or TG, and between FVIIc and LDL-C in these patients. T-PA showed significant negative correlations with FBG, PAI-1, TC, LDL-C, and TG. There was a significant positive correlation between PAI-1 and TG and a significant negative correlation between PAI-1 and HDL-C. We conclude that CAPD patients may have a greater risk of CVD than do HD patients, and that coagulation and fibrinolytic activity are correlated with lipid disorders in these patients.

Factors influencing plasma lipid profiles including lipoprotein (a) concentrations in renal transplant recipients

Fasting plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and apoprotein (apo) B were elevated in 214 nondiabetic renal transplant recipients when compared to a reference group. Apo (a) was slightly but not significantly lower in transplant recipients (median 118 mg/dl, range 16-1680 vs 130 mg/dl, 10-1176) and this difference could be predicted from Lp (a) isoform analysis. Cholesterol, triglyceride, apo B and apo (a) concentrations correlated negatively with creatinine clearance but none of these parameters showed a significant association with proteinuria. Patients treated with steroids had higher plasma HDL concentrations than those receiving cyclosporin monotherapy (P < 0.01). The use of diuretics was associated with raised triglycerides (P < 0.001) and cholesterol (P < 0.01) and with reduced HDL (P < 0.01) whilst patients receiving beta-blockers had significantly higher triglycerides (P < 0.01) and lower HDL levels (P < 0.02). In multiple regression analysis, age (P < 0.01), creatinine clearance (P < 0.05) and diuretic therapy (P < 0.005) were independent risk factors for increased cholesterol whilst apo (a) levels correlated negatively with creatinine clearance (P < 0.005). These results suggest that impaired renal function, steroids and non-immunosuppressive drugs contribute to lipid abnormalites in renal transplant recipients.

Lipoprotein(a) in renal disease

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease. Several studies have described a correlation between high Lp(a) plasma levels and coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral atherosclerosis. In healthy individuals Lp(a) plasma concentrations are almost exclusively controlled by the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene locus on chromosome 6q2.6-q2.7. More than 30 alleles at this highly polymorphic gene locus determine a size polymorphism of apo(a). There exists an inverse correlation between the size (molecular weight) of apo(a) isoforms and Lp(a) plasma concentrations. Average Lp(a) levels are high in individuals with low molecular weight isoforms and low in those with high molecular weight isoforms. Mean Lp(a) plasma levels are elevated over controls in patients with renal disease. Patients with nephrotic syndrome exhibit excessively high Lp(a) plasma concentrations, which can be reduced with antiproteinuric treatment. The mechanism underlying this elevation is unclear, but the general increase in protein synthesis caused by the liver due to high urinary protein loss is a likely explanation. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) also have elevated Lp(a) levels. These are even higher in patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis than in those receiving hemodialysis. Lipoprotein(a) concentrations decrease to values observed in controls matched for apo(a) type following renal transplantation. This clearly demonstrates the nongenetic origin of Lp(a) elevation in ESRD. Both the increase in ESRD and the decrease following renal transplantation are apo(a) phenotype dependent. Only patients with high molecular weight phenotypes show the described changes in Lp(a) levels. In patients with low molecular weight types the Lp(a) concentrations remain unchanged during both phases of renal disease. As in the general population, Lp(a) is a risk factor for cardiovascular events in ESRD patients. In this patient group the apo(a) phenotype seems to be equally or better predictive of the degree of atherosclerosis than is Lp(a) concentration. Further prospective studies will be necessary to confirm these observations. Whether Lp(a) also plays a key role in the pathogenesis and progression of renal diseases needs further study. Controversial data on the role of the kidney in Lp(a) metabolism result from insufficient sample sizes of several studies. Due to the broad range and skewed distribution of Lp(a) plasma concentrations, large study groups must be investigated to obtain reliable results.

Levels of lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein cholesterol distribution in IDDM. Results from follow-up in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial

Levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], apolipoprotein (apo) B, and lipoprotein cholesterol distribution using density-gradient ultracentrifugation were measured as part of a cross-sectional study at the final follow-up examination (mean 6.2 years) in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Compared with the subjects in the conventionally treated group (n = 680), those subjects receiving intensive diabetes therapy (n = 667) had a lower level of Lp(a) (Caucasian subjects only, median 10.7 vs 12.5 mg/dl, respectively; P = 0.03), lower apo B (mean 83 vs. 86 mg/dl, respectively; P = 0.01), and a more favorable distribution of cholesterol in the lipoprotein fractions as measured by density-gradient ultracentrifugation with less cholesterol in the very-low-density lipoprotein and the dense low-density lipoprotein fractions and greater cholesterol content of the more buoyant low-density lipoprotein. Compared with a nondiabetic Caucasian control group (n = 2,158), Lp(a) levels were not different in the intensive treatment group (median 9.6 vs. 10.7 mg/dl, respectively; NS) and higher in the conventional treatment group (9.6 vs. 12.5 mg/dl, respectively; P < 0.01). No effect of renal dysfunction as measured by increasing albuminuria or reduced creatinine clearance on Lp(a) levels could be demonstrated in the diabetic subjects. Prospective follow-up of these subjects will determine whether these favorable lipoprotein differences in the intensive treatment group persist and whether they influence the onset of atherosclerosis in insulin-dependent diabetes.

Lipid abnormalities in the nephrotic syndrome: causes, consequences, and treatment

Hyperlipidemia so commonly complicates heavy proteinuria that it has come to be regarded as an integral feature of the nephrotic syndrome (NS). Characteristically, total plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels are elevated, as are very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Although high-density lipoprotein (HDL) concentrations may be normal, HDL subtypes are abnormally distributed, with a reduction of HDL2 and an increase in HDL3. In addition, lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] levels may be elevated. The mechanisms underlying these abnormalities are multifactorial, involving both increased rates of lipoprotein synthesis and defective clearance and catabolism of circulating particles. Although recent dietary and therapeutic studies have demonstrated that nephrotic hyperlipidemia can be effectively treated, the need for such intervention has not been clearly established. This pattern of lipoprotein abnormality is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in the general population, and several studies have suggested that nephrotic individuals are more likely to develop atherosclerosis. However, no prospective trials have evaluated the relationship between deranged lipid metabolism and coronary or cerebral artery disease in patients with NS. In addition, although recent experimental studies suggest that lipid abnormalities may accelerate renal injury and that lipid-lowering agents may protect renal function, there is little current evidence to suggest that such intervention is of value in preserving residual renal function in humans. Further studies are clearly required to assess the potential long-term benefits of lipid-lowering intervention in individuals with NS. In the meantime, based on data generated from other population groups, a rational approach to the clinical management of hyperlipidemia in these patients is presented.

Lipid parameters including Lp(a) in hemodialysis patients

Chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients have a high incidence and prevalence of atherosclerotic disease which may be related to numerous atherosclerotic risk factors. Among them dyslipidemia plays a significant role. Elevated Lp(a) levels, which are strongly associated with atherosclerosis, have been reported recently in uremic patients. The aim of our study was the determination of the levels of lipid parameters including Lp(a) in 151 CHD patients (76 male) aged 57 (12-81) years, who were on hemodialysis for a mean of 44.3 (range 1 to 189) months. Eighty-four normal individuals age and sex matched were used as controls. The median serum Lp(a) concentration in hemodialysis patients was 13 mg/dL compared with 6.5 mg/dL in healthy controls, p < 0.001 by distribution-free Mann-Whitney test. The prevalence of subjects with Lp(a) levels above 25 mg/dL was significantly higher in CHD patients compared to normal subjects (30% vs. 8%, p < 0.001). Even if CHD patients were matched for fasting lipid levels, they showed Lp(a) levels significantly higher than controls. No significant correlation was found between Lp(a) levels and either the age of the patients or the duration of hemodialysis. The etiology of primary renal disease did not influence the Lp(a) levels.

Elevated lipoprotein (a) levels in primary nephrotic syndrome

Elevated plasma levels of total cholesterol and increase in the hepatic synthesis of some apo B-containing lipoproteins have been noted in the nephrotic syndrome. Apoprotein (a), the apolipoprotein distinguishing lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] from low-density lipoprotein, is equally of hepatic origin, and Lp(a) recently has been shown to possess both atherogenic and thrombogenic activities. However, little is known of Lp(a) levels in nephrotic patients. We measured plasma Lp(a) concentrations in 11 patients with primary nephrotic syndrome in the absence of hematuria, hypertension, and renal insufficiency. Histologic lesions were minimal-change disease in five cases, membranous glomerulopathy in four cases, and focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis in two cases. Mean levels of Lp(a) (98 +/- 92 mg/dL [mean +/- SD]) were markedly elevated in the nephrotic patients as compared with the controls (14 +/- 13 mg/dL). No correlation was noted between plasma Lp(a) and proteinuria, albuminemia, total cholesterolemia, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apoprotein B100, or plasminogen. Furthermore, there was no correlation between Lp(a) levels and apoprotein (a) isoform size. In four patients, the level of Lp(a) decreased approximately fourfold after remission of the nephrotic syndrome under corticosteroid treatment. Our observation that Lp(a) levels are elevated in the nephrotic syndrome is consistent with the hypothesis that these patients may be at an increased risk of cardiovascular and thrombotic complications.

Lipoprotein(a) and treatment of chronic renal disease

OBJECTIVES

To compare lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and albumin concentrations in patients with chronic renal disease receiving different forms of treatment and to determine, if any, the relationship between these variables.

DESIGN

A prospective cross-sectional, case-controlled study.

SETTING

A tertiary referral nephrology and dialysis unit.

SUBJECTS

Forty-four consecutive non-diabetic patients with chronic renal failure treated by renal transplantation (n = 18), haemodialysis (n = 18), continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD; n = 8), and 30 healthy controls from subjects drawn from University personnel were studied.

INTERVENTIONS

Fasting morning venous blood was analysed for Lp(a), albumin, total cholesterol and glucose concentrations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Comparison of plasma levels of these variables between the sub-groups.

RESULTS

Concentrations (median; 95% CI) of Lp(a) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher (38.4 mg dl-1; range 15.4-72.0) and of albumin lower (31.6 g l-1; range 28-35.2) in the CAPD group compared with both control subjects and other groups of chronic renal disease patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The elevated Lp(a) concentrations seen only in association with reduced albumin concentrations in CAPD patients suggest a regulatory role for albumin with albumin losses stimulating production of Lp(a).

Simvastatin therapy for hypercholesterolemic patients with nephrotic syndrome or significant proteinuria

Experimental evidence suggests that lipid lowering therapy could slow the progression of renal disease in humans. We have conducted a double-blind, placebo controlled trial of the HMG CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin in patients with the nephrotic syndrome or significant proteinuria (> 1 g/day) and hypercholesterolemia (> or = 6.5 mmol/liter). Patients were placed on a lipid lowering diet for at least 10 weeks before randomization. After a four-week placebo run-in, 30 adults were randomized to simvastatin or placebo therapy (10 mg/day, increasing to 20 to 40 mg/day as required) for 24 weeks. There were seven dropouts, none of whom were "definitely" related to drug therapy. Total and LDL cholesterol levels fell by a mean of 33 and 31%, respectively, in simvastatin treated patients, compared with only 5 and 1% in patients on placebo (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Apolipoprotein B100 levels fell by a mean of 31% in the simvastatin group but rose 0.3% in the placebo group (P = 0.014). There were no significant changes in HDL levels. There were no significant differences between the groups in their urine protein levels, their rise in plasma creatinine, or decline in plasma inulin clearance. Simvastatin is a safe, effective therapy for hypercholesterolemia in proteinuric states. A much larger trial is needed to show if potent lipid-lowering therapy slows progression of hypercholesterolemic proteinuric diseases.

Lipoprotein(a) in nephrotic syndrome

Lipoprotein(a) [LP(a)] is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and it has also been speculated that it promotes thrombosis. Recent studies have shown that patients with gross proteinuria have greatly increased plasma levels of Lp(a), but the genesis is obscure. In the present study, plasma Lp(a) levels were measured in 31 patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS), 24 patients with IgA nephropathy and 43 healthy control subjects. Lp(a) levels were significantly elevated in NS (median 49.0 mg/dl), in contrast to the control subjects and patients with IgA nephropathy (median 7.0 and 9.7 mg/dl, respectively). Plasma Lp(a) levels fell markedly in 10 of 10 NS patients after remission. In NS, Lp(a) levels correlated directly with serum cholesterol levels (P < 0.05) and indirectly with plasma orosomucoid levels (P < 0.05), but not with serum albumin, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, urinary protein excretion or GFR. In addition, Lp(a) tended to be higher in NS patients with edema (median 54.3 mg/dl) than in patients without edema (19.0 mg/dl; P = 0.06). Nine NS patients were further evaluated with plasma ANP levels and urinary sodium excretion. Plasma Lp(a) correlated directly with ANP (P < 0.01) and indirectly with urinary sodium excretion (P < 0.05). Excellent correlations were found between Lp(a) and VLDL cholesterol and VLDL triglycerides, respectively, suggesting a close link between Lp(a) and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in nephrosis.

Lipoprotein(a) in patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been identified as an independent, inherited risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease. An elevation of Lp(a) plasma levels has been documented in several series of uremic patients submitted to maintenance dialysis treatment methods or after renal transplantation. We have measured the plasma levels of Lp(a) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent enzyme method in 19 patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Mean (+/- SD) concentration of Lp(a) was significantly higher in the patients than in the 19 healthy controls (51 +/- 48 mg/dL v 16 +/- 15 mg/dL, P < 0.005). No significant differences in Lp(a) levels were found between diabetic patients (n = 5) and nondiabetic patients (n = 14) or between patients who had (n = 6) or had not (n = 13) suffered a previous major cardiovascular complication. No correlation was evident between Lp(a) levels and the patients' ages, period of time on CAPD treatment, or any other lipid-lipoprotein investigated parameter. The mechanisms accounting for the elevation of Lp(a) levels in CAPD patients as well as the specific value of increased Lp(a) concentration as a cardiovascular risk predictor in uremic patients remain thus far speculative. Additional experimental and clinical studies are warranted before the administration of drugs to attempt to lower Lp(a) levels in CAPD patients can be recommended.

Does cyclosporin increase lipoprotein(a) concentrations in renal transplant recipients?

Cyclosporin, the immunosuppressant of choice for renal transplant recipients, has been implicated as the cause of abnormalities in serum lipid concentrations in these patients. We have measured serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations and analysed the distribution of apoprotein(a) isoforms in 90 renal transplant recipients receiving cyclosporin and prednisolone (with or without azathioprine), 59 patients receiving azathioprine and prednisolone alone, and 146 non-hyperlipidaemic controls. Cyclosporin-treated patients had significantly higher lipoprotein(a) concentrations (median 170 [interquartile range 55-382] mg/L) than those receiving azathioprine and prednisolone (64 [10-204] mg/L, p = 0.001) or the healthy controls (94 [18-280] mg/L, p = 0.008). The difference between the azathioprine and prednisolone group and the controls was not significant. Although the time since transplantation was significantly shorter for the cyclosporin-treated group, there was no correlation between lipoprotein(a) concentration and time since transplantation (r = -0.13, p = 0.18). Apoprotein(a) phenotyping showed no significant differences in the distribution of apoprotein(a) isoforms between the treatment groups or between patient and control groups. Lipoprotein(a) concentrations are higher in renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporin than in those maintained on azathioprine and prednisolone. The mechanisms underlying this abnormality remain to be elucidated.