Early net ultrafiltration rate and mortality in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy

The interaction of net ultrafiltration rate with urine output and fluid balance after continuous renal replacement therapy initiation: A multi-Centre study

PURPOSE

During continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), a high net ultrafiltration rate (NUF) may worsen the decrease in urine output (UO) associated with starting CRRT. However, fluid balance (FB) may modulate this association. We aimed to examine the relationship between NUF, UO and FB at the start of CRRT.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 1030 CRRT-treated patients admitted to two tertiary ICUs.

RESULTS

Median age was 60 years (IQR, 48-70), median APACHE III was 94 (IQR, 76-114) and median NUF rate was 0.7 mL/kg/h. In the 24 h after CRRT started, the mean hourly UO decreased from 25.5 mL to 11.9 mL (P < 0.001). Moreover, after adjusting for multiple confounders on multivariable analysis, a higher NUF was not significantly associated with a lower UO (-1.5 mL/kg for every 1 mL/kg/h increase in NUF; 95% CI -3.1 to 0.04; p = 0.064). In addition, pre-CRRT FB did not modulate the above relationship between higher NUF and lower UO.

CONCLUSION

A higher NUF rate was not significantly associated with a greater immediate and sustained reduction in UO after CRRT commencement. FB before CRRT was also not associated with a greater reduction in UO. These findings do not provide evidence for an effect of NUF on renal function.

Behind the scenes: Key lessons learned from the RELIEVE-AKI clinical trial

Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is commonly used to manage critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury. While recent trials focused on the correct dosing and timing of CKRT, our understanding regarding the optimum dose of net ultrafiltration is limited to retrospective data. The Restrictive versus Liberal Rate of Extracorporeal Volume Removal Evaluation in Acute Kidney Injury (RELIEVE-AKI) trial has been conducted to assess the feasibility of a prospective randomized trial in determining the optimum net ultrafiltration rate. This paper outlines the relevant challenges and solutions in implementing this complex ICU-based trial. Several difficulties were encountered, starting with clinical issues related to conducting a trial on patients with rapidly changing hemodynamics, low patient recruitment rates, increased nursing workload, and the enormous volume of data generated by patients undergoing prolonged CKRT. Following several brainstorming sessions, several points were highlighted to be considered, including the need to streamline the intervention, add more flexibility in the trial protocols, ensure comprehensive a priori planning, particularly regarding nursing roles and their compensation, and enhance data management systems. These insights are critical for guiding future ICU-based dynamically titrated intervention trials, leading to more efficient trial management, improved data quality, and enhanced patient safety.

Relative Blood Volume Monitoring during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Prospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Hematocrit monitoring during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) allows the continuous estimation of relative blood volume (RBV). This may enable early detection of intravascular volume depletion prior to clinical sequelae. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of extended RBV monitoring and its epidemiology during usual CRRT management by clinicians unaware of RBV. Moreover, we studied the association between changes in RBV and net ultrafiltration (NUF) rates.

METHODS

In a cohort of adult intensive care unit patients receiving CRRT, we continuously monitored hematocrit and RBV using a pre-filter noninvasive optical sensor. We analyzed temporal changes in RBV and investigated the association between RBV change and NUF rates, using the classification of NUF rates into low, moderate, or high based on predefined cut-offs.

RESULTS

We obtained >60,000 minute-by-minute measurements in >1,000 CRRT hours in 36 patients. The median RBV change was negative (decrease) in 69% of patients and the median peak change in RBV was -9.3% (interquartile range: -3.9% to -14.3%). Moreover, the median RBV decreased from baseline by >5% in 40.2% of measurements and by >10% in 20.6% of measurements. Finally, RBV decreased significantly more when patients received a high NUF rate (>1.75 mL/kg/h) compared to low or moderate NUF rates (5.32% vs. 1.93% or 1.97%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Continuous hematocrit and RBV monitoring during CRRT was feasible. RBV decreased significantly during CRRT, and decreases were greater with higher NUF rates. RBV monitoring may help optimize NUF management and prevent the occurrence of intravascular volume depletion.

Knowledge, attitude, practice, needs, and implementation status of intensive care unit staff toward continuous renal replacement therapy: a survey of 66 hospitals in central and South China

BACKGROUND

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a commonly utilized form of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the intensive care unit (ICU). A specialized CRRT team (SCT, composed of physicians and nurses) engage playing pivotal roles in administering CRRT, but there is paucity of evidence-based research on joint training and management strategies. This study armed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of ICU staff toward CRRT, and to identify education pathways, needs, and the current status of CRRT implementation.

METHODS

This study was performed from February 6 to March 20, 2023. A self-made structured questionnaire was used for data collection. Descriptive statistics, T-tests, Analysis of variance (ANOVA), multiple linear regression, and Pearson correlation coefficient tests (α = 0.05) were employed.

RESULTS

A total of 405 ICU staff from 66 hospitals in Central and South China participated in this study, yielding 395 valid questionnaires. The mean knowledge score was 51.46 ± 5.96 (61.8% scored highly). The mean attitude score was 58.71 ± 2.19 (73.9% scored highly). The mean practice score was 18.15 ± 0.98 (85.1% scored highly). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that gender, age, years of CRRT practice, ICU category, and CRRT specialist panel membership independently affected the knowledge score; Educational level, years of CRRT practice, and CRRT specialist panel membership independently affected the attitude score; Education level and teaching hospital employment independently affected the practice score. The most effective method for ICU staff to undergo training and daily work experience is within the department.

CONCLUSION

ICU staff exhibit good knowledge, a positive attitude and appropriately practiced CRRT. Extended CRRT practice time in CRRT, further training in a general ICU or teaching hospital, joining a CRRT specialist panel, and upgraded education can improve CRRT professional level. Considering the convenience of training programs will enhance ICU staff participation. Training should focus on basic CRRT principles, liquid management, and alarm handling.

Current Fluid Management Practice in Critically Ill Adults on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Binational, Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

In critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), a positive fluid balance (FB) is associated with adverse outcomes. However, current FB management practices in CRRT patients are poorly understood. We aimed to study FB and its components in British and Australian CRRT patients to inform future trials.

METHODS

We obtained detailed electronic health record data on all fluid-related variables during CRRT and hourly FB for the first 7 days of treatment.

RESULTS

We studied 1,616 patients from three tertiary intensive care units (ICUs) in two countries. After the start of CRRT, the mean cumulative FB became negative at 31 h and remained negative over 7 days to a mean nadir of -4.1 L (95% confidence interval (CI) of -4.6 to -3.5). The net ultrafiltration (NUF) rate was the dominant fluid variable (-67.7 mL/h; standard deviation (SD): 75.7); however, residual urine output (-34.7 mL/h; SD: 54.5), crystalloid administration (48.1 mL/h; SD: 44.6), and nutritional input (36.4 mL/h; SD: 29.7) significantly contributed to FB. Patients with a positive FB after 72 h of CRRT were more severely ill, required high-dose vasopressors, and had high lactate concentrations (5.0 mmol/L; interquartile range: 2.3-10.5). A positive FB was independently associated with increased hospital mortality (odds ratio: 1.70; 95% CI; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

In the study ICUs, most CRRT patients achieved a predominantly NUF-dependent negative FB. Patients with a positive FB at 72 h had greater illness severity and haemodynamic instability. Achieving equipoise for conducting trials that target a negative early FB in such patients may be difficult.

Proceedings of the 2022 UAB CRRT Academy: Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring to Guide Fluid Removal with CRRT and Proliferation of Extracorporeal Blood Purification Devices

In 2022, we celebrated the 15th anniversary of the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) Academy, a 2-day conference attended yearly by an international audience of over 100 nephrology, critical care, and multidisciplinary trainees and practitioners. This year, we introduce the proceedings of the UAB CRRT Academy, a yearly review of select emerging topics in the field of critical care nephrology that feature prominently in the conference. First, we review the rapidly evolving field of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring and its potential to guide fluid removal by renal replacement therapy (RRT). We begin by summarizing the accumulating data associating fluid overload with harm in critical illness and the potential for harm from end-organ hypoperfusion caused by excessive fluid removal with RRT, underscoring the importance of accurate, dynamic assessment of volume status. We describe four applications of point-of-care ultrasound used to identify patients in need of urgent fluid removal or likely to tolerate fluid removal: lung ultrasound, inferior vena cava ultrasound, venous excess ultrasonography, and Doppler of the left ventricular outflow track to estimate stroke volume. We briefly introduce other minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies before concluding that additional prospective data are urgently needed to adapt these technologies to the specific task of fluid removal by RRT and to learn how best to integrate them into practical fluid-management strategies. Second, we focus on the growth of novel extracorporeal blood purification devices, starting with brief reviews of the inflammatory underpinnings of multiorgan dysfunction and the specific applications of pathogen, endotoxin, and/or cytokine removal and immunomodulation. Finally, we review a series of specific adsorptive technologies, several of which have seen substantial clinical use during the COVID-19 pandemic, describing their mechanisms of target removal, the limited existing data supporting their efficacy, ongoing and future studies, and the need for additional prospective trials.

Current management of fluid balance in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: A scoping review

Objective

The overall objective of this scoping review is to assess the extent of the literature related to the fluid management of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI).

Introduction

AKI is common in critically ill patients where fluid therapy is a mainstay of treatment. An association between fluid balance (FB) and adverse patient-centred outcomes in critically ill patients with AKI regardless of severity has been demonstrated. The evidence for the prospective intervention of FB and its impact on outcomes is unknown.

Inclusion criteria

All studies investigating FB in patients with AKI admitted to an intensive care unit were included. Literature not related to FB in the critically ill patient with AKI population was excluded.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from January 1st, 2012, onwards. We included primary research studies, experimental and observational, recruiting adult participants admitted to an intensive care unit who had an AKI. We extracted data on study and patient characteristics, as well as FB, renal-based outcomes, and patient-centred outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened citations for eligible studies and performed data extraction.

Results

Of the 13,767 studies reviewed, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Two studies examined manipulation of fluid input, 18 studies assessed enhancing fluid removal, and two studies applied a restrictive fluid protocol. Sixteen studies examined patients receiving renal replacement therapy, five studies included non-renal replacement therapy patients, and one study included both. Current evidence is broad with varied approaches to managing fluid input and fluid removal. The studies did not demonstrate a consensus approach for any aspect of the fluid management of critically ill patients. There was a limited application of a restrictive fluid protocol with no conclusions possible.

Conclusions

The current body of evidence for the management of FB in critically ill patients with AKI is limited in nature. The current quality of evidence is unable to guide current clinical practice. The key outcome of this review is to highlight areas for future research.

CARPEDIEM® for continuous kidney replacement therapy in neonates and small infants: a French multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The Cardio-Renal Pediatric Dialysis Emergency Machine (CA.R.P.E.D.I.E.M.®) device is a continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) equipment dedicated to neonates and small infants. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness, feasibility, outcomes, and technical considerations relating to CARPEDIEM® use.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 19 newborns and six infants receiving CARPEDIEM® in five French pediatric and neonatal intensive care units. Laboratory parameters were collected at the initiation and end of the first CARPEDIEM® session. Results are presented as median [IQR] (range).

RESULTS

At initiation, age was 4 days [2-13] (1-1134) with a body weight of 3.3 kg [2.5-4] (1.3-11.1). Overall, 131 sessions and 2125 h of treatment were performed. Treatment duration per patient was 42 h [24-91] (8-557). Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) was performed in 20 children. Blood flow rate was 8 mL/kg/min [6-9] (3-16). The effluent flow rate for CVVH was 74 mL/kg/h [43-99] (28-125) and net ultrafiltration (UF) 6 mL/kg/h [2-8] (1-12). In the five children treated by hemodialysis, the blood and dialysate flow rates were 6 mL/kg/min [5-7] (4-7) and 600 mL/h [300-600] (120-600), respectively, while session duration was 8 h [6-12] (2-24). Most infants required a catheter between 4.5 and 6.5 French. Hemodynamic instability with a need for volume replacement occurred in 31 sessions (23%). Thrombocytopenia was observed in 29 sessions (22%). No hemorrhage occurred; all the patients survived the sessions, but only eight patients (32%) were alive at hospital discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm that the use of CARPEDIEM® is safe and effective in critically ill neonates and infants. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Restrictive versus Liberal Rate of Extracorporeal Volume Removal Evaluation in Acute Kidney Injury (RELIEVE-AKI): a pilot clinical trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Observational studies have linked slower and faster net ultrafiltration (UFNET) rates during kidney replacement therapy (KRT) with mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and fluid overload. To inform the design of a larger randomised trial of patient-centered outcomes, we conduct a feasibility study to examine restrictive and liberal approaches to UFNET during continuous KRT (CKRT).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is an investigator-initiated, unblinded, 2-arm, comparative-effectiveness, stepped-wedged, cluster randomised trial among 112 critically ill patients with AKI treated with CKRT in 10 intensive care units (ICUs) across 2 hospital systems. In the first 6 months, all ICUs started with a liberal UFNET rate strategy. Thereafter, one ICU is randomised to the restrictive UFNET rate strategy every 2 months. In the liberal group, the UFNET rate is maintained between 2.0 and 5.0 mL/kg/hour; in the restrictive group, the UFNET rate is maintained between 0.5 and 1.5 mL/kg/hour. The three coprimary feasibility outcomes are (1) between-group separation in mean delivered UFNET rates; (2) protocol adherence; and (3) patient recruitment rate. Secondary outcomes include daily and cumulative fluid balance, KRT and mechanical ventilation duration, organ failure-free days, ICU and hospital length of stay, hospital mortality and KRT dependence at hospital discharge. Safety endpoints include haemodynamics, electrolyte imbalance, CKRT circuit issues, organ dysfunction related to fluid overload, secondary infections and thrombotic and haematological complications.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The University of Pittsburgh Human Research Protection Office approved the study, and an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board monitors the study. A grant from the United States National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases sponsors the study. The trial results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This trial has been prospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05306964). Protocol version identifier and date: 1.5; 13 June 2023.

Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 - From Pathophysiological Mechanisms to a Personalized Therapeutic Model

Acute kidney injury is a common complication of COVID-19, frequently fuelled by a complex interplay of factors. These include tubular injury and three primary drivers of cardiocirculatory instability: heart-lung interaction abnormalities, myocardial damage, and disturbances in fluid balance. Further complicating this dynamic, renal vulnerability to a "second-hit" injury, like a SARS-CoV-2 infection, is heightened by advanced age, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes mellitus. Moreover, the influence of chronic treatment protocols, which may constrain the compensatory intrarenal hemodynamic mechanisms, warrants equal consideration. COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury not only escalates mortality rates but also significantly affects long-term kidney function recovery, particularly in severe instances. Thus, the imperative lies in developing and applying therapeutic strategies capable of warding off acute kidney injury and decelerating the transition into chronic kidney disease after an acute event. This narrative review aims to proffer a flexible diagnostic and therapeutic strategy that recognizes the multi-faceted nature of COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury in critically ill patients and underlines the crucial role of a tailored, overarching hemodynamic and respiratory framework in managing this complex clinical condition.

Fluid Management for Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury Receiving Kidney Replacement Therapy: An International Survey

BACKGROUND

In critically ill patients receiving KRT, high ultrafiltration rates and persistent fluid accumulation are associated with adverse outcomes. The purpose of this international survey was to evaluate current practices and evidence gaps related to fluid removal with KRT in critically ill patients.

METHODS

This was a multinational, web-based survey distributed by seven networks comprising nephrologists and intensivists. Physicians involved in the care of critically ill patients were invited to complete a 39-question survey about fluid management practices on KRT. The survey was distributed from September 2021 to December 2021.

RESULTS

There were 757 respondents from 96 countries (response rate of 65%). Most respondents practiced adult medicine (89%) and worked in an academic center (69%). The majority (91%) reported aiming for a 0.5- to 2-L negative fluid balance per day when fluid removal is indicated, although there was important variability in what respondents considered a safe maximal target. Intensivists were more likely than nephrologists to use adjunct volume status assessment methods ( i.e. , ultrasound, hemodynamic markers, and intra-abdominal pressure), while nephrologists were more likely to deploy cointerventions aimed at improving tolerance to fluid removal ( i.e. , osmotic agents and low-temperature dialysate). There was a broad consensus that rapid decongestion should be prioritized when fluid accumulation is present, but the prevention of hypotension was also reported as a competing priority. A majority (77%) agreed that performing trials that compare fluid management strategies would be ethical and clinically relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified multiple areas of variability in current practice of fluid management for patients receiving KRT. Most nephrologists and intensivists agreed that several knowledge gaps related to fluid removal strategies should be investigated in future randomized controlled trials.

Volume Management with Kidney Replacement Therapy in the Critically Ill Patient

While the administration of intravenous fluids remains an important treatment, the negative consequences of subsequent fluid overload have raised questions about when and how clinicians should pursue avenues of fluid removal. Decisions regarding fluid removal during critical illness are complex even for patients with preserved kidney function. This article seeks to apply general concepts of fluid management to the care of patients who also require KRT. Because optimal fluid management for any specific patient is likely to change over the course of critical illness, conceptual models using phases of care have been developed. In this review, we will examine the implications of one such model on the use of ultrafiltration during KRT for volume removal in distributive shock. This will also provide a useful lens to re-examine published data of KRT during critical illness. We will highlight recent prospective trials of KRT as well as recent retrospective studies examining ultrafiltration rate and mortality, review the results, and discuss applications and shortcomings of these studies. We also emphasize that current data and techniques suggest that optimal guidelines will not consist of recommendations for or against absolute fluid removal rates but will instead require the development of dynamic protocols involving frequent cycles of reassessment and adjustment of net fluid removal goals. If optimal fluid management is dynamic, then frequent assessment of fluid responsiveness, fluid toxicity, and tolerance of fluid removal will be needed. Innovations in our ability to assess these parameters may improve our management of ultrafiltration in the future.

How to Determine Fluid Management Goals during Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy in Patients with AKI: Focus on POCUS

The utilization of kidney replacement therapies (KRT) for fluid management of patients who are critically ill has significantly increased over the last years. Clinical studies have suggested that both fluid accumulation and high fluid removal rates are associated with adverse outcomes in the critically ill population receiving KRT. Importantly, the ideal indications and/or fluid management strategies that could favorably affect these patients are unknown; however, differentiating clinical scenarios in which effective fluid removal may provide benefit to the patient by avoiding congestive organ injury, compared with other settings in which this intervention may result in harm, is direly needed in the critical care nephrology field. In this review, we describe observational data related to fluid management with KRT, and examine the role of point-of-care ultrasonography as a potential tool that could provide physiologic insights to better individualize decisions related to fluid management through KRT.

Dose Optimization of Teicoplanin for Critically Ill Patients With Renal Dysfunction and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Experience From a Prospective Interventional Study

Background: Due to the lack of updated information on teicoplanin (TEI) for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), no exact dosage regimen has been recommended. The aim of this study was to optimize the dosage regimen of TEI in renal dysfunction patients with or without CRRT, evaluate the influence factors of the eradication of Gram-positive bacteria, and evaluate the effect of CRRT on the clearance of TEI.

Methods: Patients with renal dysfunction receiving TEI treatment in the ICU were prospectively recruited and divided into CRRT and non-CRRT groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the factors affecting the eradication of Gram-positive bacteria. The filtrate concentration of the CRRT group was measured at the time of TEI C_min, and the filtration coefficient of TEI was calculated to evaluate the effect of CRRT on the clearance of TEI.

Results: A total of 106 patients were included, 40 cases in the CRRT group and 66 cases in the non-CRRT group. After giving high-loading doses of TEI, 75.8 and 70% of TEI C_min in the non-CRRT and CRRT groups reached the range of 10–30 mg/L before the 3rd dose, respectively. The risk of G⁺ bacteria being uneradicated was higher while the APACHEⅡscore was higher than 22.5. The albumin level before the start of TEI administration and before the 6th–8th dose was lower than 32.8 g/L and 29.3 g/L, respectively, and C_min before the 3rd dose and 6th–8th dose was lower than 13.2 mg/L and 17.1 mg/L, respectively, with the duration of TEI therapy shorter than 10.5 days. The correlation coefficient (r) was 0.6490 between C_min before the 3rd dose and the albumin level (p < 0.001). The filtration coefficient of TEI was 10.7 ± 2.4% at C_min and 11.1 ± 2.5% at C_max. The GFR had no correlation with the filtration coefficient (r = −0.06204; r = −0.08059). The clearance of TEI in CRRT patients was negatively correlated with the albumin level (r = −0.6305, p = 0.0013).

Conclusion: The early stage of the albumin level can significantly affect the initial C_min and clinical efficacy of TEI, and also had effect on the clearance of TEI by CRRT. The filtration coefficient of TEI was stable, even with a higher ultrafiltration rate.

Ultrafiltration in Japanese critically ill patients with acute kidney injury on renal replacement therapy

A recent worldwide survey indicates an international diversity in net ultrafiltration (UF^NET) practices for the treatment of fluid overload in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). The sub-analysis of the survey has demonstrated that maximum doses of furosemide used before determination of diuretic resistance are lower in Japan than those prescribed worldwide and UF^NET is lower but is initiated earlier. In contrast, the interval during which practitioners evaluate fluid balance is longer. The characterization of RRT in critically ill patients in Japan should unveil more appropriate approaches to the successful treatment of AKI.

The Association of an Early Net Ultrafiltration Rate and 28-Day Mortality in Patients Receiving Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy

Background: An early net ultrafiltration (NUF) rate may be associated with prognosis in patients receiving continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). In this study, we tested whether high or low early NUF rates in patients treated with CKRT were associated with increased mortality. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational study among all patients in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database who received CKRT for more than 24 h within 14 days after intensive care unit admission. We defined the early (initial 48 h) NUF rate as the amount of fluid removal per hour adjusted by the patients' weight and took it as a classified variable (low rate: <1.6, moderate rate: 1.6-3.1 and high rate: > 3.1 ml/kg/h). The association between 28-day mortality and the NUF rate was analyzed by logistic regression and mediation analyses. Results: A total of 911 patients were included in our study. The median NUF rate was 2.71 (interquartile range 1.90-3.86) ml/kg/h and the 28-day mortality was 40.1%. Compared with the moderate NUF rate, the low NUF rate (adjusted odds ratio 1.56, 95% CI 1.04-2.35, p = 0.032) and high NUF rate (adjusted odds ratio 1.43, 95% CI 1.02-2.01, p = 0.040) were associated with higher 28-day mortality. The putative effect of high or low NUF rates on 28 day mortality was not direct [adjusted average direct effects (ADE) for a low NUF rate = 0.92, p = 0.064; adjusted ADE for a high NUF rate = 1.03, p = 0.096], but mediated by effects of the NUF rate on fluid balance during the same period [adjusted average causal mediation effects (ACME) 0.96, p = 0.010 for a low NUF rate; adjusted ACME 0.99, p = 0.042 for a high NUF rate]. Moreover, we found an increase trend in the NUF rate corresponding to the lowest mortality when fluid input increased. Conclusion: Compared with NUF rates between 1.6-3.1 ml/kg/h in the first 48 h of CKRT, NUF rates > 3.1 and <1.6 ml/kg/h were associated with higher mortality.

Timing of renal-replacement therapy in intensive care unit-related acute kidney injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The optimal timing of renal-replacement therapy (RRT) initiation for the management of acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is frequently controversial. An earlier-strategy has biological rationale, even in the absence of urgent indications; however, a delayed-strategy may prevent selected patients from receiving RRT and avoid complications related to RRT.

RECENT FINDINGS

Previous studies assessing the optimal timing of RRT initiation found conflicting results, contributing to variation in clinical practice. The recent multinational trial, standard vs. accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury (STARRT-AKI) found no survival benefit and a higher risk of RRT dependence with an accelerated compared to a standard RRT initiation strategy in critically ill patients with severe AKI. Nearly 40% of patients allocated to the standard-strategy group did not receive RRT. The Artificial Kidney Initiation in Kidney Injury-2 (AKIKI-2) trial further assessed delayed compared to more-delayed strategies for RRT initiation. The more-delayed strategy did not confer an increase in RRT-free days and was associated with a higher risk of death.

SUMMARY

Early preemptive initiation of RRT in critically ill patients with AKI does not confer clear clinical benefits. However, protracted delays in RRT initiation may be harmful.

["Intravascular space contracted-tissue space expanded": interstitial edema and fluid management in intensive care medicine]

In the second phase of shock therapy, we regularly find fluid overload with edema in our patients, which not only involves the skin and interstitial tissue but can also impair kidney, liver and pulmonary function. Revision of the Starling principle and new insights into physiology of the endothelial glycocalyx have important implications for fluid therapy in intensive care medicine. Determination of fluid overload and an appropriate therapy with either diuretics or ultrafiltration are the focus of "late goal-directed fluid removal" management.

Survey of U.S. Critical Care Practitioners on Net Ultrafiltration Prescription and Practice among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Kidney Replacement Therapy

INTRODUCTION

The current prescription and practice of net ultrafiltration among critically ill patients receiving kidney replacement therapy in the U.S. are unclear.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To assess the attitudes of U.S. critical care practitioners on net ultrafiltration (UFNET) prescription and practice among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury treated with kidney replacement therapy.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was conducted of a multinational survey of intensivists, nephrologists, advanced practice providers, and ICU and dialysis nurses practising in the U.S.

RESULTS

Of 1,569 respondents, 465 (29.6%) practitioners were from the U.S. Mainly were nurses and advanced practice providers (58%) and intensivists (38.2%). The median duration of practice was 8.7 (IQR, 4.2-19.4) years. Practitioners reported using continuous kidney replacement therapy (as the first modality in 60% (IQR 20%-90%) for UFNET. It was found that there was a significant variation in assessment of prescribed-to-delivered dose of UFNET, use of continuous kidney replacement therapy for UFNET, methods used to achieve UFNET, and assessment of net fluid balance during continuous kidney replacement therapy. There was also variation in interventions performed for managing hemodynamic instability, perceived barriers to UFNET, belief that early and protocol-based fluid removal is beneficial, and willingness to enroll patients in a clinical trial.

CONCLUSIONS

There was considerable practice variation in UFNET among critical care practitioners in the U.S., reflecting the need to generate evidence-based practice guidelines for UFNET.

Early restrictive fluid balance is associated with lower hospital mortality independent of acute disease severity in critically ill patients on CRRT

Fluid overload (FO) with coincident acute kidney injury has been associated with increased mortality. However, it is unclear whether FO is an independent determinant of mortality for disease severity. We aimed to explore whether the development of fluid balance (FB) during the first 72 h of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is independently associated with hospital mortality. All patients admitted to a single centre ICU requiring CRRT for at least 24 h between years 2010–2019 were included. Extracted data included patient demographics and clinical parameters including daily cumulative fluid balance (FB^cum), lactate, SOFA score and vasoactive requirement at the initiation and during the first 72 h of CRRT. 399 patients were included in the analysis. Hospital survivors had a significantly lower FB^cum at CRRT initiation compared to non-survivors (median 1382 versus 3265 ml; p = 0.003). Hourly fluid balance per bodyweight (FB^net) was lower in survivors at 0–24, 24–48 and 48–72 h after initiation of CRRT (p < 0.008 for all comparisons). In the survival analysis (analyzed with counting process model) significant time-dependent explanatory variables for hospital mortality were FB^net (per ml/kg/h: HR: 1.319, 95% CI 1.038–1.677, p = 0.02), lactate (HR: 1.086, 95% CI 1.030–1.145, p = 0.002) and SOFA score (per ml/kg/h: HR: 1.084, 95% CI 1.025–1.146, p = 0.005) during the first 72 h of CRRT. Even after careful adjustment for repeated measures of disease severity, FB^net during the first 72 h of CRRT remains independently associated with hospital mortality, in critically ill patients with AKI.

[Intravenous fluid therapy and acute kidney injury - What's new?]

Optimization of intravascular volume is crucial for patients who are at risk or undergo Acute Kidney Injury. In sepsis or after acute fluid loss extensive fluid expansion is mostly needed. However, in cardiorenal syndroms fluid overload can even lead to AKI itself and reduction of intravascular volume is needed. Thus, an individualized fluid guidance in terms of a "fluid management stewartship" for the right patient, the right drug, the right route and the right dose 1 has to be applied.

Association between Net Ultrafiltration Rate and Renal Recovery among Critically Ill Adults with Acute Kidney Injury Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An Observational Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Higher net ultrafiltration (UFNET) rates are associated with mortality among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to discover whether UFNET rates are associated with renal recovery and independence from renal replacement therapy (RRT).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using data from the Randomized Evaluation of Normal versus Augmented Level of Renal Replacement Therapy trial that enrolled 1,433 critically ill patients with AKI and treated with CRRT between December 2005 and November 2008 across 35 intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand. We examined the association between UFNET rate and time to independence from RRT by day 90 using competing risk regression after accounting for mortality. The UFNET rate was defined as the volume of fluid removed per hour adjusted for patient body weight.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Median age was 67.3 (interquartile range [IQR], 57-76.3) years, 64.4% were male, median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-III score was 100 (IQR, 84-118), and 634 (44.2%) died by day 90. Kidney recovery occurred in 755 patients (52.7%). Using tertiles of UFNET rates, 3 groups were defined: high, >1.75; middle, 1.01-1.75; and low, <1.01 mL/kg/h. Proportion of patients alive and independent of RRT among the groups were 47.8 versus 57.2 versus 53.0%; p = 0.01. Using competing risk regression, higher UFNET rate tertile compared with middle (cause-specific hazard ratio [csHR], 0.79, 95% CI, 0.66-0.95; subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.80, 95% CI, 0.67-0.97) and lower (csHR, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.56-0.85; sHR, 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.95) tertiles were associated with a longer time to independence from RRT. Every 1.0 mL/kg/h increase in rate was associated with a lower probability of kidney recovery (csHR, 0.81, 95% CI, 0.74-0.89; and sHR, 0.87, 95% CI, 0.80-0.95). Using the joint model, longitudinal increases in UFNET rates were also associated with a lower renal recovery (β = -0.29, p < 0.001). UFNET rates >1.75 mL/kg/h compared with rates 1.01-1.75 and <1.01 mL/kg/h were associated with a longer duration of dependence on RRT. Randomized clinical trials are required to confirm this UFNET rate-outcome relationship.

Ultrafiltration in critically ill patients treated with kidney replacement therapy

Management of fluid overload is one of the most challenging problems in the care of critically ill patients with oliguric acute kidney injury. Various clinical practice guidelines support fluid removal using ultrafiltration during kidney replacement therapy. However, ultrafiltration is associated with considerable risks. Emerging evidence from observational studies suggests that both slow and fast rates of net fluid removal (that is, net ultrafiltration (UFNET)) during continuous kidney replacement therapy are associated with increased mortality compared with moderate UFNET rates. In addition, fast UFNET rates are associated with an increased risk of cardiac arrhythmias. Experimental studies in patients with kidney failure who were treated with intermittent haemodialysis suggest that fast UFNET rates are also associated with ischaemic injury to the heart, brain, kidney and gut. The UFNET rate should be prescribed based on patient body weight in millilitres per kilogramme per hour with close monitoring of patient haemodynamics and fluid balance. Dialysate cooling and sodium modelling may prevent haemodynamic instability and facilitate large volumes of fluid removal in patients with kidney failure who are treated with intermittent haemodialysis, but the effects of this strategy on organ injury are less well studied in critically ill patients treated with continuous kidney replacement therapy. Randomized trials are required to examine whether moderate UFNET rates are associated with a reduced risk of haemodynamic instability, organ injury and improved outcomes in critically ill patients.

Kidney Replacement Therapy for Fluid Management

Emerging evidence from observational studies suggests that both slower and faster net ultrafiltration rates during kidney replacement therapy are associated with increased mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury and fluid overload. Faster rates are associated with ischemic organ injury. The net ultrafiltration rate should be prescribed based on patient body weight in milliliters per kilogram per hour, with close monitoring of patient hemodynamics and fluid balance. Randomized trials are required to examine whether moderate net ultrafiltration rates compared with slower and faster rates are associated with reduced risk of hemodynamic instability, organ injury, and improved outcomes.

Regional citrate anticoagulation versus low molecular weight heparin for CRRT in hyperlactatemia patients: A retrospective case-control study

INTRODUCTION

There were controversial opinions on the use of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in hyperlactatemia patients, which was considered as one of the contraindications of citrate. The aim of our present study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RCA versus LMWH for CRRT in hyperlactatemia patients.

METHODS

Adult patients with hyperlactatemia who underwent RCA or LMWH CRRT in our center between January 2014 and March 2018 were retrospectively recruited. Filter lifespan, ultrafiltration, purification, bleeding, citrate accumulation, filter clot, and the infusion of blood production were evaluated as endpoints.

RESULTS

Of the 127 patients included in the original cohort, 81 and 46 accepted RCA and LMWH CRRT, respectively. The filter lifespan was significantly prolonged in the RCA group compared to the LMWH group (44.25 h [2 -83] vs. 24 h [4 -67], p < 0.001). The accumulated filter survival proportions were significantly improved in the RCA group compared to the LMWH group in the original cohort (p < 0.001) as well as the matched group (p < 0.001). The filters clotted more frequently in the LMWH group than in the RCA group in both of the original (52.2% vs 26.8%, p = 0.001) and matched cohort (58.6% vs 19.4%, p = 0.001). The bleeding complication was significantly reduced in the RCA group than in the LMWH group in the matched cohort (28.6% vs 4.5%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

In critically ill patients with hyperlactatemia requiring CRRT, RCA is superior to LMWH in terms of filter lifespan and bleeding risk without significantly increased risk of citrate accumulation and citrate related metabolic complications. RCA most likely is a safe and effective anticoagulation method for CRRT in patients with hyperlactatemia.

How To Prescribe And Troubleshoot Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Case-Based Review

Continuous RRT (CRRT) is the preferred dialysis modality for solute management, acid-base stability, and volume control in patients who are critically ill with AKI in the intensive care unit (ICU). CRRT offers multiple advantages over conventional hemodialysis in the critically ill population, such as greater hemodynamic stability, better fluid management, greater solute control, lower bleeding risk, and a more continuous (physiologic) approach of kidney support. Despite its frequent use, several aspects of CRRT delivery are still not fully standardized, or do not have solid evidence-based foundations. In this study, we provide a case-based review and recommendations of common scenarios and interventions encountered during the provision of CRRT to patients who are critically ill. Specific focus is on initial prescription, CRRT dosing, and adjustments related to severe hyponatremia management, concomitant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, dialysis catheter placement, use of regional citrate anticoagulation, and antibiotic dosing. This case-driven simulation is made as the clinical status of the patient evolves, and is on the basis of step-wise decisions made during the care of this patient, according to the specific patient's needs and the logistics available at the corresponding institution.

Net ultrafiltration prescription survey in Europe

Background

Fluid overload is common in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and ultrafiltration (UF) is frequently required. There is lack of guidance on optimal UF practice. We aimed to explore patterns of UF practice, barriers to achieving UF targets, and concerns related to UF practice among practitioners working in Europe.

Methods

This was a sub-study of an international open survey with focus on adult intensivists and nephrologists, advanced practice providers, and ICU and dialysis nurses working in Europe.

Results

Four hundred eighty-five practitioners (75% intensivists) from 31 countries completed the survey. The most common criteria for UF initiation was persistent oliguria/anuria (45.6%), followed by pulmonary edema (16.7%). Continuous renal replacement therapy was the preferred initial modality (90.0%). The median initial and maximal rate of net ultrafiltration (UF^NET) prescription in hemodynamically stable patients were 149 mL/hr. (IQR 100–200) and 300 mL/hr. (IQR 201–352), respectively, compared to a median UF^NET rate of 98 mL/hr. (IQR 51–108) in hemodynamically unstable patients and varied significantly between countries.

Two-thirds of nurses and 15.5% of physicians reported assessing fluid balance hourly. When hemodynamic instability occurred, 70.1% of practitioners reported decreasing the rate of fluid removal, followed by starting or increasing the dose of a vasopressor (51.3%). Most respondents (90.7%) believed in early fluid removal and expressed willingness to participate in a study comparing protocol-based fluid removal versus usual care.

Conclusions

There was a significant variation in UF practice and perception among practitioners in Europe. Future research should focus on identifying the best strategies of prescribing and managing ultrafiltration in critically ill patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-020-02184-y.

Heterogeneity of Effect of Net Ultrafiltration Rate among Critically Ill Adults Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

INTRODUCTION

In continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)-treated patients, a net ultrafiltration (NUF) rate >1.75 mL/kg/h has been associated with increased mortality. However, there may be heterogeneity of effect of NUF rate on mortality, according to patient characteristics.

METHODS

To investigate the presence and impact of heterogeneity of effect, we performed a secondary analysis of the "Randomized Evaluation of Normal versus Augmented Level of Renal Replacement Therapy" (RENAL) trial. Exposure was NUF rate (weight-adjusted fluid volume removed per hour) stratified into tertiles (<1.01 mL/kg/h; 1.01-1.75 mL/kg/h; or >1.75 mL/kg/h). Primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Patients were clustered according to baseline characteristics. Heterogeneity of effect was assessed according to clusters and baseline edema and related to the additional impact of baseline cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. We excluded patients with missing values for baseline weight and/or treatment duration.

RESULTS

We identified 2 clusters. The largest (cluster 1; n = 941) included more severely ill patients, with more sepsis, more edema, and more vasopressor therapy (all p < 0.001). Compared to the middle tertile, the probability of harm was greater with the high tertile of NUF rate in patients in cluster 1 and in patients with baseline edema (probability of harm, cluster 1: 99.9%; edema: 99.1%). Moreover, higher baseline cardiovascular SOFA score also increased mortality risk with both high and low compared to middle NUF rates in cluster 1 patients and in patients with edema.

CONCLUSIONS

In CRRT patients, both high and low NUF rates may be harmful, especially in those with edema, sepsis, and greater illness severity. Cardiovascular SOFA scores modulate this association. Additional studies are needed to test these hypotheses, and targeted trials of NUF rates based on risk stratification appear justified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00221013.