1
|
Moore A, Zhang Z, Fei T, Zhang L, Accomando L, Schmitt AM, Higginson DS, Mueller BA, Zinovoy M, Gelblum DY, Yerramilli D, Xu AJ, Brennan VS, Guttmann DM, Grossman CE, Dover LL, Shaverdian N, Pike LRG, Cuaron JJ, Dreyfuss A, Lis E, Barzilai O, Bilsky MH, Yamada Y. 40 Gray in 5 Fractions for Salvage Reirradiation of Spine Lesions Previously Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Neurosurgery 2024:00006123-990000000-01077. [PMID: 38456696 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A retrospective single-center analysis of the safety and efficacy of reirradiation to 40 Gy in 5 fractions (reSBRT) in patients previously treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy to the spine was performed. METHODS We identified 102 consecutive patients treated with reSBRT for 105 lesions between 3/2013 and 8/2021. Sixty-three patients (61.8%) were treated to the same vertebral level, and 39 (38.2%) to overlapping immediately adjacent levels. Local control was defined as the absence of progression within the treated target volume. The probability of local progression was estimated using a cumulative incidence curve. Death without local progression was considered a competing risk. RESULTS Most patients had extensive metastatic disease (54.9%) and were treated to the thoracic spine (53.8%). The most common regimen in the first course of stereotactic body radiotherapy was 27 Gy in 3 fractions, and the median time to reSBRT was 16.4 months. At the time of simulation, 44% of lesions had advanced epidural disease. Accordingly, 80% had myelogram simulations. Both the vertebral body and posterior elements were treated in 86% of lesions. At a median follow-up time of 13.2 months, local failure occurred in 10 lesions (9.5%). The 6- and 12-month cumulative incidences of local failure were 4.8% and 6%, respectively. Seven patients developed radiation-related neuropathy, and 1 patient developed myelopathy. The vertebral compression fracture rate was 16.7%. CONCLUSION In patients with extensive disease involvement, reSBRT of spine metastases with 40 Gy in 5 fractions seems to be safe and effective. Prospective trials are needed to determine the optimal dose and fractionation in this clinical scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Assaf Moore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
- Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Teng Fei
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Laura Accomando
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam M Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Daniel S Higginson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Boris A Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Melissa Zinovoy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Daphna Y Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Divya Yerramilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amy J Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Victoria S Brennan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - David M Guttmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Craig E Grossman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Laura L Dover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Narek Shaverdian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Luke R G Pike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - John J Cuaron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexandra Dreyfuss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric Lis
- Department of Imaging, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ori Barzilai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mark H Bilsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Burgess L, Nguyen E, Tseng CL, Guckenberger M, Lo SS, Zhang B, Nielsen M, Maralani P, Nguyen QN, Sahgal A. Practice and principles of stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100716. [PMID: 38226025 PMCID: PMC10788412 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is the dominant treatment modality for painful spine and non-spine bone metastases (NSBM). Historically, this was achieved with conventional low dose external beam radiotherapy, however, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied for these indications. Meta-analyses and randomized clinical trials have demonstrated improved pain response and more durable tumor control with SBRT for spine metastases. However, in the setting of NSBM, there is limited evidence supporting global adoption and large scale randomized clinical trials are in need. SBRT is technically demanding requiring careful consideration of organ at risk tolerance, and strict adherence to technical requirements including immobilization, simulation, contouring and image-guidance procedures. Additional considerations include follow up practices after SBRT, with appropriate imaging playing a critical role in response assessment. Finally, there is renewed research into promising new technologies that may further refine the use of SBRT in both spinal and NSBM in the years to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Burgess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Walker Family Cancer Centre, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simon S. Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Beibei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle Nielsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pejman Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Centre, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Z, Wang Y, Zhao L, Li Y. Epidemiology, Characteristics, and Prognostic Factors of Primary Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors in the Spinal Canal: A Systematic Review. Neurospine 2024; 21:182-203. [PMID: 38317556 PMCID: PMC10992646 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2347096.548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Primary atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RTs) in the spinal canal are rare central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms that are challenging to diagnose and treat. To date, there has been no standard treatment regimen for these challenging malignant tumors. Thus, we conducted this research to explore potential prognostic factors and feasible treatment modalities for improving the prognosis of these tumors. Articles were retrieved from the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases, using the keywords "atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor," "rhabdoid tumor," "spine," "spinal," "spinal neoplasm", and "spinal cord neoplasm." All eligible cases demonstrated SMARCB1-deficient expression validated by pathological examination. We collected and analyzed data related to clinical presentation, radiological features, pathological characteristics, treatment modalities and prognosis via Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Thirty-six articles comprising 58 spinal AT/RT patients were included in the study. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 18 and 22 months, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significant survival improvements for OS in the nonmetastasis, male, radiotherapy and intrathecal chemotherapy groups as well as for PFS in the chemotherapy and radiotherapy groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that chemotherapy and radiotherapy were prognostic factors for improved PFS, and that intrathecal chemotherapy reduced the risk of mortality. Spinal AT/RTs are uncommon malignant entities with a dismal survival rate. Although our review is limited by variability between cases, there is some evidence revealing potential risk factors and the importance of systematic chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy and radiotherapy in spinal AT/RT treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhibin Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yubo Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Liyan Zhao
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yunqian Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Redmond KJ, Hattangadi-Gluth J, Pollum EL, Trifiletti DM, Kim MM, Milano M. Navigating the Spinal Frontier: Recent Data on Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spine Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:313-317. [PMID: 38220248 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | | | - Erqi Liu Pollum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | | | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Michael Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nguyen EK, Ruschin M, Zhang B, Soliman H, Myrehaug S, Detsky J, Chen H, Sahgal A, Tseng CL. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases: a review of 24 Gy in 2 daily fractions. J Neurooncol 2023; 163:15-27. [PMID: 37155133 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04327-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has proven to be a highly effective treatment for selected patients with spinal metastases. Randomized evidence shows improvements in complete pain response rates and local control with lower retreatment rates favoring SBRT, compared to conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT). While there are several reported dose-fractionation schemes for spine SBRT, 24 Gy in 2 fractions has emerged with Level 1 evidence providing an excellent balance between minimizing treatment toxicity while respecting patient convenience and financial strain. METHODS We provide an overview of the 24 Gy in 2 SBRT fraction regimen for spine metastases, which was developed at the University of Toronto and tested in an international Phase 2/3 randomized controlled trial. RESULTS The literature summarizing global experience with 24 Gy in 2 SBRT fractions suggests 1-year local control rates ranging from 83-93.9%, and 1-year rates of vertebral compression fracture ranging from 5.4-22%. Reirradiation of spine metastases that failed prior cEBRT is also feasible with 24 Gy in 2 fractions, and 1-year local control rates range from 72-86%. Post-operative spine SBRT data are limited but do support the use of 24 Gy in 2 fractions with reported 1-year local control rates ranging from 70-84%. Typically, the rates of plexopathy, radiculopathy and myositis are under 5% in those series reporting mature follow up, with no cases of radiation myelopathy (RM) reported in the de novo setting when the spinal cord avoidance structure is limited to 17 Gy in 2 fractions. However, re-irradiation RM has been observed following 2 fraction SBRT. More recently, 2-fraction dose escalation with 28 Gy, with a higher dose constraint to the critical neural tissues, has been reported suggesting improved rates of local control. This regimen may be important in those patients with radioresistant histologies, high grade epidural disease, and/or paraspinal disease. CONCLUSION The dose-fractionation of 24 Gy in 2 fractions is well-supported by published literature and is an ideal starting point for centers looking to establish a spine SBRT program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric K Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Mark Ruschin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Beibei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guckenberger M, Dahele M, Ong WL, Sahgal A. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases: Benefits and Limitations. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:159-171. [PMID: 36990633 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Progress in biological cancer characterization, targeted systemic therapies and multimodality treatment strategies have shifted the goals of radiotherapy for spinal metastases from short-term palliation to long-term symptom control and prevention of compilations. This article gives an overview of the spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) methodology and clinical results of SBRT in cancer patients with painful vertebral metastases, metastatic spinal cord compression, oligometastatic disease and in a reirradiation situation. Outcomes after dose-intensified SBRT are compared with results of conventional radiotherapy and patient selection criteria will be discussed. Though rates of severe toxicity after spinal SBRT are low, strategies to minimize the risk of vertebral compression fracture, radiation induced myelopathy, plexopathy and myositis are summarized, to optimize the use of SBRT in multidisciplinary management of vertebral metastases.
Collapse
|
7
|
Radiation myelopathy following stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine metastases. J Neurooncol 2022; 159:23-31. [PMID: 35737172 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04037-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now considered a standard of care treatment option in the management of spine metastases. One of the most feared complications of spine SBRT is radiation myelopathy (RM). METHODS We provided a narrative review of RM following spine SBRT based on review of the published literature, including data on spinal cord dose constraints associated with the risk of RM, strategies to mitigate the risk, and management options for RM. RESULTS There are limited published data of cases of RM following spine SBRT with detailed spinal cord dosimetry. The HyTEC report provided recommendations for the point maximal dose (Dmax) for the spinal cord that is associated with a < 5% risk of RM for 1-5 fractions spine SBRT. In the setting of spine SBRT reirradiation after previous conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT), factors associated with RM are: SBRT spinal cord Dmax, cumulative spinal cord Dmax, and the time interval between previous RT and SBRT reirradiation. There are various strategies to mitigate the risk of RM, including accurate delineation of the spinal cord (or thecal sac), strict adherence to the recommended spinal cord dose constraints, and robust treatment immobilisation set-up and delivery. Limited effective treatment options are available for patients who develop RM, and these include corticosteroids, hyperbaric oxygen, and bevacizumab; however, none have been supported by high quality evidence. CONCLUSION RM is a rare but devastating complication following SBRT for spine metastases. There are strategies to minimise the risk of RM to ensure safe delivery of spine SBRT.
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen X, LeCompte MC, Gui C, Huang E, Khan MA, Hu C, Sciubba DM, Kleinberg LR, Lo SFL, Redmond KJ. Deviation from consensus contouring guidelines predicts inferior local control after spine stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:215-222. [PMID: 35667571 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To analyze the impact of target delineation on local control (LC) after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spine metastasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with de novo metastasis of the spine treated with SBRT, excluding those with prostate or hematologic malignancies, were retrospectively reviewed. Deviations from consensus contouring guidelines included incomplete coverage of involved vertebral compartments, omission of adjacent compartments, or unnecessary circumferential coverage. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed using death as a competing risk. RESULTS 283 patients with 360 discrete lesions were included with a median follow up of 14.6 months (range 1.2-131.3). The prescription dose was 24-27Gy in 2-3 fractions for the majority of lesions. Median survival after SBRT was 18.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.8-22.8). The 1 and 2-year LC rates were 81.1% (95% CI: 75.5-85.6%) and 70.6% (95% CI: 63.2-76.8%), respectively. In total, 60 deviations (16.7%) from consensus contouring guidelines were identified. Deviation from guidelines was associated with inferior LC (1-year LC 63.0% vs 85.5%, p<0.001). GI primary, epidural extension, and paraspinal extension were all associated with inferior LC on univariable analyses. After adjusting for confounding factors, deviation from guidelines was the strongest predictor of inferior LC (HR 3.52, 95% CI: 2.11-5.86, p<0.001). Among guideline-compliant treatments, progressions were mainly in field (61%) and/or epidural (49%), while marginal (42%) and/or epidural progressions (58%) were most common for those with deviations. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to consensus contouring guidelines for spine SBRT is associated with superior LC and fewer marginal misses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuguang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Michael C LeCompte
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Chengcheng Gui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ellen Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Majid A Khan
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University. Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Chen Hu
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States; Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, North Shore University Hospital. Manhasset, NY, United States
| | - Lawrence R Kleinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Sheng-Fu Larry Lo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States; Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, North Shore University Hospital. Manhasset, NY, United States
| | - Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Faruqi S, Chen H, Fariselli L, Levivier M, Ma L, Paddick I, Pollock BE, Regis J, Sheehan J, Suh J, Yomo S, Sahgal A. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Postoperative Spine Malignancy: A Systematic Review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guidelines. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:e65-e78. [PMID: 34673275 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine safety and efficacy of postoperative spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the published literature, and to present practice recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed, specific to postoperative spine SBRT, using PubMed and Embase databases. A meta-analysis for 1-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and vertebral compression fracture (VCF) probability was conducted. RESULTS The literature search revealed 251 potentially relevant articles after duplicates were removed. Of these 56 were reviewed in-depth for eligibility and 12 met all the inclusion criteria for analysis. 7 studies were retrospective, 2 prospective observational and 3 were prospective phase I/II clinical trials. Outcomes for a total of 461 patients and 499 spinal segments were reported. 10 studies used an MRI fused to CT-simulation for treatment planning, 2 investigations reported on all patients receiving a CT-myelogram at the time of planning. Meta-analysis for 1 year LC and OS was 88.9% and 57%, respectively. The crude reported VCF rate was 5.6%. One case of myelopathy was described in a patient with a previously irradiated spinal segment. One patient developed an esophageal fistula requiring surgical repair. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative spine SBRT delivers a high 1-year LC with acceptably low toxicity. Patients that may benefit from this include those with oligometastatic disease, radioresistant histology, paraspinal masses and/or those with a history of prior irradiation to the affected spinal segment. The ISRS recommends a minimum interval of 8 to 14 days after invasive surgery prior to simulation for SBRT, with initiation of radiotherapy within 4 weeks of surgery. An MRI fused to the planning CT, and/or the use of a CT-myelogram, are necessary for target and organ-at-risk delineation. A planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV) of 1.5 to 2mm for the spinal cord is advised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salman Faruqi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Laura Fariselli
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milano, Unità di Radioterapia, Milan, Italy
| | - Marc Levivier
- Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Lijun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ian Paddick
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bruce E Pollock
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jean Regis
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - John Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Shoji Yomo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vellayappan BA, Foote M, Chang EL, Suh JH, Saigal R, Hofstetter CP, Lo SS. Commentary: Mature Imaging-Based Outcomes Supporting Local Control for Complex Reirradiation Salvage Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Neurosurgery 2020; 87:E498-E499. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Balamurugan A Vellayappan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Matthew Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Eric L Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Rajiv Saigal
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Christoph P Hofstetter
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|