Submaximal Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Peri-Procedural and Long-Term Risk

ARISE II Consensus on the Management of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is one of the leading causes of ischemic stroke worldwide. Despite advances in its diagnosis and management, there is no clear consensus on best practices to manage ICAD. This report summarizes the ARISE II (Roundtable Discussion With Industry and Stroke Experts) consensus in treating ICAD. The consensus underscored the importance of lifestyle modification and medical management in patients with ICAD. Patients who fail medical management are candidates for endovascular treatment. Open surgery is not recommended in patients who lack demonstrated hemodynamic insufficiency. The consensus also identified gaps in knowledge about the optimal duration of antithrombotics, the effect of the CYP2C19 genotype on medical management, the need for newer devices, and the standardization of antithrombotic protocols before stenting in an acute setting. Optical coherence tomography requires additional clinical data before defining its role in the diagnosis of ICAD.

Modified microcatheter first-pass effect: Enhancing diagnostic accuracy and treatment strategies for ICAS in acute ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of the modified microcatheter first-pass effect in guiding treatment decisions for ICAS-related occlusions during endovascular therapy (EVT) for AIS.

METHODS

This study analyzed data from 31 AIS patients with a positive modified microcatheter first-pass effect from the OCEAN-AIS-EVT REGISTRY collected between July 2023 and January 2024. We evaluated diagnostic accuracy, procedural efficiency, recanalization rates, and safety.

RESULTS

ICAS was confirmed in all cases. The median age was 69 years, with 61.29 % males. The median NIHSS score was 9, and ASPECTS was 9. Stenosis primarily occurred in the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (74.19 %). The median puncture-to-recanalization time was 18.92 min. Successful recanalization (eTICI grade 3) was achieved in 87.10 % of cases. Post-procedural hemorrhage occurred in 12.90 % of patients, with symptomatic hemorrhage in 3.23 %. At 90-day follow-up, 80.64 % had an mRS score of 0-2.

CONCLUSION

The modified microcatheter first-pass effect may serve as a promising preliminary tool for guiding EVT strategy in ICAS-related AIS. By confirming distal vessel patency, it enables direct angioplasty without prior thrombectomy, simplifying the procedure and reducing mechanical manipulation. While this exploratory approach has shown potential to enhance treatment efficiency and improve clinical outcomes, larger-scale prospective studies are needed to further validate these preliminary findings.

Stenting Versus Medical Therapy for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Whether the long-term benefit of stroke prevention when stenting is added to medical therapy (MT) over MT alone for symptomatic severe intracranial artery stenosis offsets the perioperative risks of the stenting has not been directly evaluated in a randomized trial. We aimed to compare the long-term (>3 years) effect of stenting versus MT alone in patients with symptomatic severe intracranial artery stenosis in a randomized trial.

METHODS

We extended the follow-up of 358 subjects enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial conducted at 8 centers in China. Patients with transient ischemic attack or stroke attributed to severe intracranial stenosis (70% to 99%) were recruited between March 5, 2014, and November 10, 2016. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or death within 30 days or stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery beyond 30 days. Other secondary outcomes included stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery, as well as disabling stroke or death after enrollment.

RESULTS

A total of 358 patients (stenting 176 versus MT 182) were recruited from March 5, 2014, and followed up till January 22, 2024. The median duration of follow-up was 7.4 years (interquartile range, 6.0-8.0). The primary outcome was not significantly different (stenting 14.8% versus MT 14.3%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.58-1.77]; P=0.97). No significant difference was found between groups for the secondary outcomes: stroke in the territory of qualifying artery (14.8% versus 14.3%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.58-1.77]; P=0.97), disabling stroke or death (16.5% versus 14.3%; hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.66-1.91]; P=0.70), and death (9.1% versus 7.1%; hazard ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.58-2.58]; P=0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides compelling evidence that, even over prolonged observed periods, the addition of stenting to MT does not confer additional benefits to MT alone in patients with symptomatic severe intracranial artery stenosis. These results underscore the importance of MT as the cornerstone of long-term stroke prevention in this patient population.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01763320.

Comparing the effectiveness and safety of rescue balloon angioplasty versus stenting in acute large vessel occlusion after thrombectomy

BACKGROUND

Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a leading cause of failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT). To achieve successful recanalisation, rescue strategies such as balloon angioplasty and stenting are frequently employed. In this study, we aimed to investigate the comparative efficacy and safety of these strategies.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the data of 321 patients with ICAS-related large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with rescue balloon angioplasty (n=212) or stenting (n=109) after MT. The primary outcome was favourable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 3 months. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of outcomes, including subgroup analyses for anterior and posterior circulation.

RESULTS

Overall, data of 321 patients (median age, 60 (IQR, 53-67) years; 80.4% male) were analysed from an initial cohort of 1601 patients. At 3 months, the balloon group demonstrated a trend towards a higher rate of favourable outcomes (34.9% vs 45.8%; OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.09, p=0.098). The stent group showed a trend towards a higher incidence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (11.0% vs 4.2%; OR 2.22, 95% CI 0.80 to 6.14, p=0.124). In the posterior circulation subgroup, favourable outcomes were significantly lower in the stent group (20.5% vs 41.5%; OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.98, p=0.047).

CONCLUSION

Balloon angioplasty after MT may improve clinical outcomes to some extent in ICAS-related LVO with a lower incidence of intracranial haemorrhage compared with stenting, while stenting is an effective measure to prevent long-term restenosis.

Comparison of drug-coated balloon with bare-metal stent in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: the AcoArt sICAS randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Restenosis after stenting with a standard bare-metal stent (BMS) is the main cause of stroke recurrence for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS). Whether a drug-coated balloon (DCB) could reduce the risk of restenosis for such patients is unknown. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of DCB in reducing 6 month restenosis in patients with sICAS.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint clinical trial was conducted at 13 stroke centers across China. Eligible patients aged 18-80 years with sICAS defined as a recent transient ischemic attack (<180 days) or ischemic stroke (14-180 days) before enrollment attributed to a 70-99% atherosclerotic stenosis of a major intracranial artery were recruited between June 4, 2021 and September 15, 2022 (final follow-up: April 13, 2023). Patients were randomly assigned to receive a DCB (n=90) or BMS at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the post-procedure incidence of restenosis in the target lesion at 6 months (165-225 days). The safety outcome was post-procedure target vessel-related stroke (hemorrhage or ischemia) or death at 30 days.

RESULTS

Among 201 randomized patients, 180 were confirmed eligible (mean age 58 years) and completed the trial. Compared with BMS, DCB was associated with a lower rate of post-procedure incidence of restenosis in the target lesion at 6 months (6.9% vs 32.9%, OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.42, P=0.0003). Regarding the safety outcome, post-procedure target vessel-related stroke (hemorrhage or ischemia) or death at 30 days did not differ between the two groups (4.4% vs 5.6%, OR 0.79, 95%CI 0.21 to 3.05, P=0.73).

CONCLUSION

DCB was superior to BMS in reducing the incidence of restenosis without increasing the risk of target vessel-related stroke or death within 6 months. Further trials comparing the outcomes of DCB with medical management for sICAS are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04631055.

Submaximal versus aggressive angioplasty with drug-coated balloons for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloons (DCB) can decrease the incidence of restenosis in the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of submaximal angioplasty with DCB dilation compared with aggressive angioplasty in patients with symptomatic ICAS.

METHODS

This study prospectively and consecutively enrolled patients with symptomatic ICAS who underwent DCB angioplasty between January 2021 and December 2023. Based on the balloon size, the patients were divided into submaximal (50-80% of normal vessel diameter) or aggressive (80-100% of normal vessel diameter) angioplasty groups. The efficacy and safety of angioplasty including ischemic stroke/intracranial hemorrhage, death, arterial dissection, and follow-up outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into submaximal (n=55) and aggressive (n=62) angioplasty groups. All the balloons were successfully delivered to the lesion location and expanded. The dissection rate (3.6% vs 17.7%, P=0.018) and incidence of remedial stenting (7.3% vs 21.0%, P=0.040) after balloon dilation were significantly greater after aggressive angioplasty than after submaximal angioplasty. A residual stenosis rate of ≥30% was more common in the submaximal angioplasty group than in the aggressive angioplasty group (27.3% vs 8.1%, P=0.006). Periprocedural complications (1.8% vs 8.1%, P=0.212), recurrent ischemic events (1.8% vs 4.8%, P=0.621), and restenosis (3.6% vs 8.1%, p=0.445) were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Submaximal angioplasty has a favorable technical profile, periprocedural safety, and long-term efficacy, suggesting that it is a promising alternative treatment for symptomatic ICAS.

First-in-human trial of a self-expandable, temporary dilation system for intracranial atherosclerotic disease in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) significantly contributes to ischemic stroke, especially among Asian populations. Large vessel occlusion (LVO) due to underlying ICAD accounts for 15-35% of acute ischemic stroke cases requiring endovascular therapy. However, the successful recanalization rate of ICAD-related LVO remains lower. The TG dilator is a self-expandable device, temporarily dilating ICAD-related blocked blood vessels.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate TG dilator safety and efficacy for ICAD-related acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

This was a single-arm, open-label, non-randomized, prospective, multicenter, and investigator-initiated trial that involved patients undergoing TG dilator application for acute ischemic stroke caused by ICAD-related LVO or severe stenosis.

RESULTS

We enrolled 10 patients in this trial between November 2022 and April 2023. The median (IQR) age was 68 (59.3-75.3) years. Before using the dilator, seven patients received stent retriever treatment. All 10 patients were prescribed a loading dose of aspirin with prasugrel. The median application time was 10 (10-12) min. At the end of the procedure, we achieved significant recanalization immediately in all patients. The stenosis/occlusion decreased from 100% (100-100) to 68% (56.3-75.3). No patient experienced recurrent ischemic stroke or reocclusion within 90 days. We achieved a modified Rankin scale score of 0-2 in 8 patients by day 90. We detected no cases of intracranial hemorrhage, equipment failure, distal embolism, vasospasm, dissection, or perforation requiring intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute revascularization using the TG dilator on patients with ICAD-related LVO or severe stenosis did not cause any significant adverse event, and consistently improved blood flow at 90 days.

Prevalence, diagnosis and management of intracranial atherosclerosis in White populations: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) represents a leading cause of ischemic stroke worldwide, conferring increased risk of recurrent stroke and poor clinical outcomes among stroke survivors. Emerging evidence indicates a paradigm shift, pointing towards increasing detection rates of ICAD among White populations and an evolving epidemiological profile across racial and ethnic groups. The present review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of ICAD, focusing on its pathophysiology, diagnostic approach, and evolving epidemiological trends, including underlying mechanisms, advanced neuroimaging techniques for diagnostic evaluation, racial disparities in prevalence, and current and emerging management strategies.

MAIN BODY

Atherosclerotic plaque accumulation and progressive arterial stenosis of major intracranial arteries comprise the pathophysiological hallmark of ICAD. In clinical practice, the diagnosis of intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS) or high-grade ICAS is reached when luminal narrowing exceeds 50% and 70%, respectively. Advanced neuroimaging, including high-resolution vessel wall MRI (HRVW-MRI), has recently enabled ICAD detection before luminal stenosis occurs. While earlier studies disclosed significant racial disparities in ICAS prevalence, with higher rates among Asians, Hispanics, and Blacks, recent evidence reveals rising detection rates of ICAD among White populations. Genetic, environmental and epigenetic factors have been suggested to confer an increased susceptibility of certain ethnicities and races to ICAD. Nevertheless, with improved accessibility to advanced neuroimaging, ICAD is increasingly recognized as an underlying stroke etiology among White patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke and stroke of undetermined etiology. While conventional management of ICAS entails risk factor modification, pharmacotherapy, and endovascular treatment in selected high-risk patients, substantial progress remains to be made in the management of ICAD at its early, pre-stenotic stages.

CONCLUSION

ICAD remains a critical yet underappreciated risk factor for ischemic stroke across all populations, highlighting the need for increased awareness and improved diagnostic strategies. The emerging epidemiological profile of ICAD across racial groups necessitates a reassessment of risk factors, screening protocols and preventive strategies. Future research should focus on refining the diagnostic criteria and expanding the therapeutic options to cover the full spectrum of ICAD, with the aim of improving patient outcomes and reducing the global burden of intracranial atherosclerosis and stroke.

Self-expanding intracranial drug-eluting stent system in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: initial experience and midterm angiographic follow-up

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a major cause of ischemic stroke worldwide. In patients undergoing endovascular treatment for ICAS, in-stent restenosis (ISR) is associated with ischemic stroke recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

Intracranial drug-eluting self-expanding stent systems (COMETIU; Sinomed Neurovita Technology Inc., CHN) are new devices for treating ICAS. This study evaluated the perioperative experience and medium-term outcomes of COMETIU in 16 patients.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 16 patients with ICAS (≥ 70% stenosis) who underwent intravascular therapy between September 4, 2022, and February 1, 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of ISR at 6 months postoperatively. The secondary efficacy outcomes were device and technical success rates. The secondary safety outcomes included stroke or death within 30 days after the procedure and the cumulative annual rate of recurrent ischemic stroke in the target-vessel territory from 31 days to 6 months and 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients with 16 intracranial atherosclerotic lesions were treated with 16 COMETIUs. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia with 100% device and technical success rates, with no cases of periprocedural stroke or death. The mean radiographic follow-up duration was at least 6 months postoperatively, and all patients presented for radiographic and clinical follow-up. There were no reported ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes. Angiographic follow-up for all patients revealed no cases of ISR.

CONCLUSION

COMETIU is safe and effective for treating ICAS, with minimal risk during the procedure and a low rate of ISR during medium-term follow-up.

Balloon Angioplasty vs Medical Management for Intracranial Artery Stenosis: The BASIS Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Previous randomized clinical trials did not demonstrate the superiority of endovascular stenting over aggressive medical management for patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS). However, balloon angioplasty has not been investigated in a randomized clinical trial.

Objective

To determine whether balloon angioplasty plus aggressive medical management is superior to aggressive medical management alone for patients with sICAS.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A randomized, open-label, blinded end point clinical trial at 31 centers across China. Eligible patients aged 35 to 80 years with sICAS defined as recent transient ischemic attack (<90 days) or ischemic stroke (14-90 days) before enrollment attributed to a 70% to 99% atherosclerotic stenosis of a major intracranial artery receiving treatment with at least 1 antithrombotic drug and/or standard risk factor management were recruited between November 8, 2018, and April 2, 2022 (final follow-up: April 3, 2023).

Interventions

Submaximal balloon angioplasty plus aggressive medical management (n = 249) or aggressive medical management alone (n = 252). Aggressive medical management included dual antiplatelet therapy for the first 90 days and risk factor control.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a composite of any stroke or death within 30 days after enrollment or after balloon angioplasty of the qualifying lesion or any ischemic stroke in the qualifying artery territory or revascularization of the qualifying artery after 30 days through 12 months after enrollment.

Results

Among 512 randomized patients, 501 were confirmed eligible (mean age, 58.0 years; 158 [31.5%] women) and completed the trial. The incidence of the primary outcome was lower in the balloon angioplasty group than the medical management group (4.4% vs 13.5%; hazard ratio, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.16-0.63]; P < .001). The respective rates of any stroke or all-cause death within 30 days were 3.2% and 1.6%. Beyond 30 days through 1 year after enrollment, the rates of any ischemic stroke in the qualifying artery territory were 0.4% and 7.5%, respectively, and revascularization of the qualifying artery occurred in 1.2% and 8.3%, respectively. The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in the balloon angioplasty and medical management groups was 1.2% and 0.4%, respectively. In the balloon angioplasty group, procedural complications occurred in 17.4% of patients and arterial dissection occurred in 14.5% of patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

In patients with sICAS, balloon angioplasty plus aggressive medical management, compared with aggressive medical management alone, statistically significantly lowered the risk of a composite outcome of any stroke or death within 30 days or an ischemic stroke or revascularization of the qualifying artery after 30 days through 12 months. The findings suggest that balloon angioplasty plus aggressive medical management may be an effective treatment for sICAS, although the risk of stroke or death within 30 days of balloon angioplasty should be considered in clinical practice.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03703635.

A case of acute basilar artery occlusion due to atherosclerotic disease revascularized by drug-coated balloon dilation

Acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) accounts for 1% of all ischemic stroke cases, but has a high rate of severe complications and mortality (75-91%). Intracranial atherosclerosis is an significant cause of ischemic stroke. Revascularization using stents has shown good efficacy. However, intra-stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis (ISR) are significant complications following stent placement. Drug-coated balloons (DCB), coated with the anti-proliferative drug paclitaxel (an inhibitor of endothelial proliferation), can prevent in-stent restenosis. Successful use of DCB dilation in the coronary and lower extremity vasculature has been reported. In our case, a 68-year-old Chinese male with ABAO was successfully revascularized by DCB dilation and showed dramatic improvement in stroke symptoms. This report may inform future treatment of patients with ABAO.

Balloon angiopLasty for intracranial Atherosclerotic minor Stroke/TIA (BLAST): study protocol for a multicenter prospective cohort study

Rationale/Aim

Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a common cause of stroke in Asia and is significantly associated with stroke recurrence. The Balloon angiopLasty for intracranial Atherosclerotic minor Stroke/TIA (BLAST) study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of early submaximal balloon angioplasty (SBA) combined with standard medical therapy vs. standard medical therapy alone in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) due to ICAS.

Methods

The BLAST study is a multicenter prospective cohort study which will enroll patients with minor stroke or TIA due to symptomatic ICAS within 1 week of symptom onset from 20 centers in China. Eligible patients will receive either SBA with standard medical therapy or standard medical therapy alone based on the decision of the patient or legal representative. Participants will be followed up for 1 year.

Study outcomes

The primary outcome is a composite of stroke or death within 30 days or ischemic stroke in the culprit artery territory from 30 days to 1 year. Secondary outcomes include stroke or death within 30 days, ischemic stroke in the culprit artery territory from 30 days to 1 year, restenosis rate of the culprit artery at 1 year, and neurological improvement at 90 days (assessed by mRS score). Safety outcomes include intracranial hemorrhage within 30 days and endovascular complications.

Sample size estimate

According to previous studies, the incidence of the composite clinical outcomes is 15% in the group receiving medical therapy alone. We assumed the incidence would decrease to 5% in the SBA combined with the medical therapy group. The target sample size is 416 patients (208 per group), with 90% power and 5% type I error, allowing for a 10% loss to follow-up.

Implications

The BLAST study will provide evidence regarding whether early SBA can reduce stroke recurrence and mortality in patients with minor stroke/TIA due to ICAS compared with medical therapy alone.Clinical trial registration:Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT06014723.

Balloon Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis (BASIS): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The superiority of balloon angioplasty plus aggressive medical management (AMM) to AMM alone for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis (sICAS) on efficacy and safety profiles still lacks evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

AIM

To demonstrate the design of an RCT on balloon angioplasty plus AMM for sICAS.

DESIGN

Balloon Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis (BASIS) trial is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end-point trial to investigate whether balloon angioplasty plus AMM could improve clinical outcome compared with AMM alone in patients with sICAS. Patients eligible in BASIS were 35-80 years old, with a recent transient ischaemic attack within the past 90 days or ischaemic stroke between 14 days and 90 days prior to enrolment due to severe atherosclerotic stenosis (70%-99%) of a major intracranial artery. The eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive balloon angioplasty plus AMM or AMM alone at a 1:1 ratio. Both groups will receive identical AMM, including standard dual antiplatelet therapy for 90 days followed by long-term single antiplatelet therapy, intensive risk factor management and life-style modification. All participants will be followed up for 3 years.

STUDY OUTCOMES

Stroke or death in the next 30 days after enrolment or after balloon angioplasty procedure of the qualifying lesion during follow-up, or any ischaemic stroke or revascularisation from the qualifying artery after 30 days but before 12 months of enrolment, is the primary outcome.

DISCUSSION

BASIS trail is the first RCT to compare the efficacy and safety of balloon angioplasty plus AMM to AMM alone in sICAS patients, which may provide an alternative perspective for treating sICAS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03703635; https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

Future of Endovascular and Surgical Treatments of Atherosclerotic Intracranial Stenosis

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease and resultant intracranial stenosis is a global leading cause of stroke, and poses an ongoing treatment challenge. Among patients with intracranial stenosis, those with hemodynamic compromise are at high risk for recurrent stroke despite medical therapy and risk factor modification. Revascularization of the hypoperfused territory is the most plausible treatment strategy for these high-risk patients, yet surgical and endovascular therapies have not yet shown to be sufficiently safe and effective in randomized controlled trials. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies have led to a resurgence of interest in surgical and endovascular treatment strategies, with a growing body of evidence to support their further evaluation in the treatment of select patient populations. This review outlines the current and emerging endovascular and surgical treatments and highlights promising future management strategies.

Comparison of drug-coated balloon with conventional balloon for angioplasty in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has been studied for reducing the occurrence of restenosis after treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), but no comparison has been published of the use of drug-coated and non-coated balloons in angioplasty for ICAS. We aim to compare the safety and efficacy of DCB angioplasty with conventional balloon (CB) angioplasty for the treatment of symptomatic ICAS.

METHODS

One hundred cases with symptomatic ICAS treated with DCB (n=49) and CB (n=51) angioplasty were retrospectively analyzed. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was completed to eliminate bias in the patients selected for further analysis. The periprocedural events and follow-up outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

There were 32 cases in each group after PSM. Technical success (<50% residual stenosis) was achieved in 30 cases (93.8%) in the DCB group and in 28 cases (87.5%) in the CB group. The rates of stroke or mortality within 30 days were 3.1% in the DCB group and 6.3% in the CB group (p=1). The incidence of restenosis in the DCB group (6.3%) was significantly lower than that in the CB group (31.3%) (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CB angioplasty, DCB angioplasty can effectively reduce the incidence of restenosis. Further studies are needed to validate the role of DCB angioplasty in the management of symptomatic ICAS.

A novel cerebrovascular drug-coated balloon catheter for treating symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis lesions: Study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, target-value clinical trial

Background

Previous single-center studies have demonstrated that drug-coated balloons (DCBs) may reduce restenosis rates, which is an important factor affecting the prognosis for intracranial interventional therapy. However, currently available cardiac DCBs are not always suitable for the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel DCB catheter designed for patients with severely symptomatic ICAS.

Methods

This prospective, multicenter, single-arm, target-value clinical trial was conducted in 9 Chinese stroke centers to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel DCB catheter for treating symptomatic severe ICAS. Primary metrics and other indicators were collected and analyzed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

A total of 155 patients were enrolled in this study. The preliminary collection of follow-up data has been completed, while data quality control is ongoing.

Conclusion

Results of this study demonstrated the patency rate, safety, and effectiveness of a novel on-label paclitaxel DCB designed for the treatment of ICAS.

Trial registration

ChiCTR, ChiCTR2100047223. Registered June 11, 2021-Prospective registration, https://www.chictr.org.cn/ChiCTR2100047223.

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease: current management strategies

A stroke due to underlying intracranial large artery occlusion, which is atherosclerotic in nature, is known as intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). It is important to recognize that ischaemic stroke due to ICAD differs from extracranial disease and other stroke aetiologies and requires a nuanced approach. It is a significant cause of stroke worldwide, and severe symptomatic ICAD can present challenges from a therapeutic standpoint, including recurrent ischaemic stroke despite optimal management. Furthermore, exploring the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the disease may be necessary while considering treatment options. This narrative review aims to provide an all-encompassing overview of this disease. Epidemiology and clinical pathophysiology will be explored in detail. The findings of large clinical trials will serve as a guide to finding the most optimized management strategies. Another critical question that arises is the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion with underlying intracranial atherosclerosis, is the treatment and clinical diagnosis the same as for other aetiologies of stroke (i.e. extracranial disease and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation)? Consequently, secondary prevention of patients with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack will be divided into medical therapy, risk factor control, and endovascular and surgical treatment options.

Personalised simulation of hemodynamics in cerebrovascular disease: lessons learned from a study of diagnostic accuracy

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) poses a significant risk of subsequent stroke but current prevention strategies are limited. Mechanistic simulations of brain hemodynamics offer an alternative precision medicine approach by utilising individual patient characteristics. For clinical use, however, current simulation frameworks have insufficient validation. In this study, we performed the first quantitative validation of a simulation-based precision medicine framework to assess cerebral hemodynamics in patients with ICAD against clinical standard perfusion imaging. In a retrospective analysis, we used a 0-dimensional simulation model to detect brain areas that are hemodynamically vulnerable to subsequent stroke. The main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC AUC) of the simulation to identify brain areas vulnerable to subsequent stroke as defined by quantitative measurements of relative mean transit time (relMTT) from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI). In 68 subjects with unilateral stenosis >70% of the internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA), the sensitivity and specificity of the simulation were 0.65 and 0.67, respectively. The ROC AUC was 0.68. The low-to-moderate accuracy of the simulation may be attributed to assumptions of Newtonian blood flow, rigid vessel walls, and the use of time-of-flight MRI for geometric representation of subject vasculature. Future simulation approaches should focus on integrating additional patient data, increasing accessibility of precision medicine tools to clinicians, addressing disease burden disparities amongst different populations, and quantifying patient benefit. Our results underscore the need for further improvement of mechanistic simulations of brain hemodynamics to foster the translation of the technology to clinical practice.

Cerebral hemodynamics in symptomatic anterior circulation intracranial stenosis measured by angiography-based quantitative flow ratio: association with CT perfusion

OBJECTIVES

Cerebral hemodynamics is important for the management of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). This study aimed to determine the utility of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio (QFR) to reflect cerebral hemodynamics in symptomatic anterior circulation ICAS by evaluating its association with CT perfusion (CTP).

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with unilateral symptomatic stenosis in the intracranial internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery who received percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or PTA with stenting were included. Murray law-based QFR (μQFR) was computed from a single angiographic view. CTP parameters including cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, mean transit time (MTT), and time to peak (TTP) were calculated, and relative values were obtained as the ratio between symptomatic and contralateral hemispheres. Relationships between μQFR and perfusion parameters, and between μQFR and perfusion response after intervention, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients had improved perfusion after treatment. μQFR was significantly correlated with relative values of TTP and MTT, with correlation coefficients of  -0.45 and  -0.26, respectively, on a per-patient basis, and  -0.72 and  -0.43, respectively, on a per-vessel basis (all p < 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity for μQFR to diagnose hypoperfusion at a cut-off value of 0.82 were 94.1% and 92.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that μQFRpost (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.48; p = 0.002), collateral score (adjusted OR, 6.97; p = 0.01), and current smoking status (adjusted OR, 0.03; p = 0.01) were independently associated with perfusion improvement after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

μQFR was associated with CTP in patients with symptomatic anterior circulation ICAS and may be a potential marker for real-time hemodynamic evaluation during interventional procedures.

KEY POINTS

• Murray law-based QFR (μQFR) is associated with CT perfusion parameters in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis and can differentiate hypoperfusion from normal perfusion. • Post-intervention μQFR, collateral score, and current smoking status are independent factors associated with improved perfusion after treatment.

Percutaneous angioplasty and/or stenting versus aggressive medical therapy in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a 1-year follow-up study

Background

Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) is one of the common causes of ischemic stroke. However, the treatment of sICAS remains a challenge in the past with unfavorable findings. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of stenting versus aggressive medical management on preventing recurrent stroke in patients with sICAS.

Methods

We prospectively collected the clinical information of patients with sICAS who underwent percutaneous angioplasty and/or stenting (PTAS) or aggressive medical therapy from March 2020 to February 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to ensure well-balanced characteristics of two groups. The primary outcome endpoint was defined as recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 1 year.

Results

We enrolled 207 patients (51 in the PTAS and 156 in the aggressive medical groups) with sICAS. No significant difference was found between PTAS group and aggressive medical group for the risk of stroke or TIA in the same territory beyond 30 days through 6 months (P = 0.570) and beyond 30 days through 1 year (P = 0.739) except for within 30 days (P = 0.003). Furthermore, none showed a significant difference for disabling stroke, death and intracranial hemorrhage within 1 year. These results remain stable after adjustment. After PSM, all the outcomes have no significant difference between these two groups.

Conclusion

The PTAS has similar treatment outcomes compared with aggressive medical therapy in patients with sICAS across 1-year follow-up.

Borderzone infarction and recurrent stroke in intracranial atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND

Intracranial stenosis (ICAS) is a common cause of stroke worldwide and patients with symptomatic ICAS exhibit a high rate of recurrence, particularly in the early period after the initial event. In this study, we aimed to study the association between borderzone infarct and recurrent ischemic stroke in patients hospitalized with symptomatic ICAS.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single center study that included patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke in the setting of intracranial stenosis (50% or more and an acute ischemic stroke in the territory supplied by the stenosed artery) over a 32-month period. We excluded patients who did not receive a brain MRI or did not have an infarct on brain imaging. The primary predictor is infarct pattern (any borderzone vs. no borderzone infarct) and the primary outcome was recurrent cerebrovascular events (RCVE) within 90 days. We used unadjusted, and age and sex adjusted logistic regression models to determine associations between infarct pattern and RCVE at 90-days.

RESULTS

Among 99 patients who met the inclusion criteria (4 tandem), the mean age was 70.1 ± 11.2 years and 41.4% were women; 43 had borderzone infarcts and 19 had RCVE. In adjusted binary logistic regression analysis, borderzone infarct was associated with increased risk of RCVE (adjusted OR 4.00 95% CI 1.33-11.99, p=0.013). The association between borderzone infarction and RCVE was not different among anterior circulation ICAD (adjusted HR 2.85 95% CI 0.64-12.76, p=0.172) vs. posterior circulation ICAD (adjusted HR 6.69 95% CI 1.06-42.11, p=0.043), p-value for interaction = 0.592.

CONCLUSION

In real world post-SAMMPRIS medically treated patients with ICAD, the borderzone infarct pattern was associated with 90-day RCVE. Borderzone infarcts are likely a surrogate marker of impaired distal blood flow, highlighting the importance of targeting stroke mechanisms and developing alternative treatment strategies for high-risk cohorts.

Long-term outcome and factors associated with restenosis after combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic intracranial stenosis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS) has not been established. We retrospectively examined the initial and long-term outcomes associated with restenosis of a combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic atherosclerotic ICAS.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent balloon angioplasty and/or stenting for ≥ 70% ICAS between 2006 and 2020 were analyzed. Patients within 48 h of stroke onset were excluded. The following procedures were established as standards at our institution: (1) primary balloon angioplasty alone was initially performed; (2) stenting for insufficient dilatation, recoiling, or dissection was conducted; and (3) stenting was considered for restenosis. Intracranial ischemic and hemorrhagic complications within 30 days after treatment were used to evaluate periprocedural safety. Recurrent ischemic events, restenosis and restenosis related factors were used to be evaluate the long-term outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients were recruited. Initial treatment consisted of balloon angioplasty (n = 101) and stenting (n = 59). Intracranial complications within 30 days after treatment were ischemic in five (3.1%) and hemorrhagic in four patients (2.5%). The incidence of these complication was 3.1% in the stenting group and 2.5% in the balloon angioplasty group. The mean follow-up period was 53.9 months. Restenosis was found in 42 patients (26%). Recurrent ischemic events during follow-up were noted in 14 patients (8.8%), of which six patients had TIA and eight patients had ischemic stroke. Restenosis-associated factors included diabetes, coronary artery disease, percent stenosis after treatment, and balloon angioplasty in logistic univariate analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that diabetes (HR: 2.084, CI: 1.039-4.180, p = 0.0386), length of lesion (HR; 1.358, CI: 1.174-1.571, p < 0.0001), and balloon angioplasty (HR: 4.194, CI: 1.083-16.239, p = 0.0379) were independent predictors for restenosis.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic ICAS had a low perioperative stroke rate and may improve long-term outcome. Balloon angioplasty, diabetes, and length of lesion were significantly associated with restenosis.

Stroke Prevention in Symptomatic Large Artery Intracranial Atherosclerosis Practice Advisory: Report of the AAN Guideline Subcommittee

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To review treatments for reducing the risk of recurrent stroke or death in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic arterial stenosis (sICAS).

METHODS

The development of this practice advisory followed the process outlined in the American Academy of Neurology Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual, 2011 Edition, as amended. The systematic review included studies through November 2020. Recommendations were based on evidence, related evidence, principles of care, and inferences.

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Clinicians should recommend aspirin 325 mg/d for long-term prevention of stroke and death and should recommend adding clopidogrel 75 mg/d to aspirin for up to 90 days to further reduce stroke risk in patients with severe (70%-99%) sICAS who have low risk of hemorrhagic transformation. Clinicians should recommend high-intensity statin therapy to achieve a goal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level <70 mg/dL, a long-term blood pressure target of <140/90 mm Hg, at least moderate physical activity, and treatment of other modifiable vascular risk factors for patients with sICAS. Clinicians should not recommend percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for stroke prevention in patients with moderate (50%-69%) sICAS or as the initial treatment for stroke prevention in patients with severe sICAS. Clinicians should not routinely recommend angioplasty alone or indirect bypass for stroke prevention in patients with sICAS outside clinical trials. Clinicians should not recommend direct bypass for stroke prevention in patients with sICAS. Clinicians should counsel patients about the risks of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting and alternative treatments if one of these procedures is being contemplated.

Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis Averts Stroke in Atherosclerotic Patients With Border-Zone Infarct: Post Hoc Analysis From a Performance Criterion Phase II Trial

BACKGROUND

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is one of the leading causes of stroke worldwide. Patients with ICAD who initially present with ischemia in border-zone areas and undergo intensive medical management (IMM) have the highest recurrence rates (37% at 1 yr) because of association with hemodynamic failure and poor collaterals.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of encephaloduroarteriosynagiosis (EDAS) on stroke recurrence in patients with ICAD and border-zone stroke (BDZS) at presentation.

METHODS

A phase II clinical trial of EDAS revascularization for symptomatic ICAD failing medical management (EDAS Revascularization for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis Steno-occlusive [ERSIAS]) was recently concluded. We analyze the outcomes of the subgroup of patients with BDZS at presentation treated with EDAS vs the previously reported Stenting versus Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) IMM subgroup with BDZS at presentation.

RESULTS

Of 52 patients included in the ERSIAS trial, 35 presented with strokes at baseline, and 28 had a BDZ pattern, including 15 (54%) with exclusive BDZS and 13 (46%) with mixed patterns (BDZ plus other distribution). Three of the 28 (10.7%) had recurrent strokes up to a median follow-up of 24 months. The rate of recurrent stroke in ICAD patients with BDZS at presentation after EDAS was significantly lower than the rate reported in the SAMMPRIS IMM subgroup with BDZS at presentation (10.7% vs 37% P = .004, 95% CI = 0.037-0.27).

CONCLUSION

ICAD patients with BDZS at presentation have lower rates of recurrent stroke after EDAS surgery than those reported with medical management in the SAMMPRIS trial. These results support further investigation of EDAS in a randomized clinical trial.

Intervention for symptomatic vertebrobasilar disease

Disease of the vertebral (VA) and basilar arteries (BA) can lead to stroke of the posterior circulation and may warrant management strategies which differ from the anterior circulation. The mechanism and location of the disease determine its natural history and therefore affect the relative risks and benefits of the possible treatment options. Vertebrobasilar (VB) atherosclerotic disease is a source of both hemodynamic and embolic posterior circulation stroke. Advances in medical therapy have decreased the rate of stroke after initial symptomatic presentation. Antiplatelet therapy, blood pressure control, and optimization of secondary risk factors can reduce recurrent stroke risk in both intracranial and extracranial VB disease. However, symptomatic intracranial disease is still associated with a high risk of subsequent stroke, particularly those with hemodynamic compromise who represent a higher risk population. Patients with hemodynamic impairment may benefit from judicious application of endovascular and microsurgical interventions to augment blood flow. Stenting, angioplasty alone, bypass surgery, and endarterectomy, represent endovascular and surgical tools available to address medically refractory VB disease. Apart from atherosclerotic disease, dissection is another etiology of VB stroke, most frequently affecting the extracranial VA. Treatment is predominantly antithrombotic therapy although surgical or endovascular intervention can be required in rare cases of persistent embolism or hemodynamic compromise. In contrast, extrinsic compromise of the VA represents a separate extracranial pathology and is best treated with mechanistically targeted surgeries or extracranial bypass.