Spiritual well-being and its association with health-related quality of life in primary brain tumor patients

Association of spirituality and quality of life in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although people are living longer with cancer, cancer has the potential to impact survivors' quality of life (QOL) negatively. Spirituality encompasses the concepts of transcendence, meaningfulness, faith, connectedness, and integrative energy. Spirituality is a part of everyday existence across cultures and religions and part of the human experience. Yet little has been published on spirituality in cancer survivorship. We could not find any previous reviews that examined the literature on the potential relationship between QOL and spirituality in cancer survivorship. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aim to examine the current literature to more fully understand the relationship between spirituality and QOL.

METHODS

Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to examine the relationship between spirituality and QOL in cancer survivorship in studies sourced from PubMed, CINHAL, and PsycINFO databases.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles published between 2005 and 2024 were included for review. All studies demonstrated a significant, positive correlation between QOL and spirituality, with r values ranging from 0.15 to 0.817.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest a positive correlation between higher spirituality and increased QOL among cancer survivors. Future research is needed to improve the understanding of this relationship and its mediators so that supportive oncologic interventions can be modified to address unmet needs and spiritual suffering. By better understanding the relationship between spirituality and QOL, we can move towards supporting the highest level of QOL possible for cancer survivors.

Illness understanding and religiousness in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

Background

Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) often have inaccurate perceptions of prognosis. Strong religious beliefs have been associated with limited illness understanding (IU) in patients with advanced cancer, but IU and religiousness have not been investigated in patients with GBM. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between religiousness and spirituality and IU in patients with GBM.

Methods

Patients enrolled in a prospective multicenter study of recurrent GBM (Coping with Glioblastoma, NCT02375841). Within one month of medical visits discussing MRI scans showing GBM progression, patients completed study surveys containing published measures of IU and religiousness. IU was compared between participants with moderate or high versus slight or no religiousness based on several patient-reported prompts using Fisher's exact tests.

Results

Twenty-four patients completed surveys of religiousness and IU. IU was partial within our cohort. Fifteen participants (62.5%) acknowledged that their illness was terminal. Only 6 (25%) correctly acknowledged their prognosis (months). Eleven patients (46%) were moderately or very religious, while 9 (38%) were either slightly religious or not at all religious. High religiousness and spirituality were each associated with partial IU (P = .06 and P = .01, respectively). A belief that God could perform a miracle to cure them of cancer and a belief in sanctity through suffering were also each associated with partial IU.

Conclusions

This prospective study that suggests religiousness, including the belief in miracles and a belief in sanctification through suffering, might influence patients' IU. Further research is warranted to study this association.

Resilience and spiritual well-being as resources for coping with radiotherapy and surviving in patients with glioblastoma

OBJECTIVES

The primary aims of this multicenter, prospective observational study were to investigate spiritual well-being, resilience, and psychosocial distress in an Italian sample of glioblastoma patients undergoing radiochemotherapy. The secondary aim was to explore the influence of demographic, clinical, and psychological characteristics on survival.

METHODS

The assessment was conducted only once, within the first week of radiochemotherapy treatment. Spiritual well-being was evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-being (FACIT-Sp-12), and religious/spiritual beliefs and practices were evaluated by the System of Belief Inventory. Resilience was evaluated by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Psychosocial distress was evaluated the by Distress Thermometer and Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale. We conducted an univariable analysis of overall survival (OS) using data from the most recent follow-up available, considering demographic and clinical variables that could influence survival. Follow-up was defined as either the time of death or the latest follow-up visit recorded.

RESULTS

We recruited 104 patients, and the median follow-up time was 18.3 months. "Distressed" patients had lower scores than "not distressed" patients on the FACIT-Sp-12 and CD-RISC. While OS was not significant according to the FACIT-Sp-12 threshold, the Kaplan-Meier log-rank test was 0.05 according to the CD-RISC threshold. Among demographic variables, age showed significant associations with OS (p = 0.011). Resilience showed significant associations with OS (p = 0.025).

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Data showed that high spiritual well-being was associated with high resilience and an absence of psychosocial distress in our sample of glioblastoma patients undergoing radiochemotherapy. Patients with greater resilience survived longer than those with lesser resilience. Profiling spiritual well-being and resilience in glioblastoma patients undergoing radiochemotherapy can be seen as a resource to identify novel characteristics to improve clinical take-in-charge of glioblastoma patients.

The relationship between social determinants of health and neurocognitive and mood-related symptoms in the primary brain tumor population: A systematic review

Social determinants of health (SDOH) impact cancer-related health outcomes, including survival, but their impact on symptoms is less understood among the primary brain tumor (PBT) population. We conducted a systematic review to examine the relationships between SDOH and neurocognitive and mood-related symptoms among the PBT population. PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched using PROGRESS criteria (place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socioeconomic status, and social capital) on March 8th, 2022. Two individuals screened and assessed study quality using the NHLBI Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies. Of 3006 abstracts identified, 150 full-text articles were assessed, and 48 were included for a total sample of 28 454 study participants. Twenty-two studies examined 1 SDOH; none examined all 8. Four studies measured place of residence, 2 race/ethnicity, 13 occupation, 42 gender, 1 religion, 18 education, 4 socioeconomic status, and 15 social capital. Fifteen studies assessed neurocognitive and 37 mood-related symptoms. While higher education was associated with less neurocognitive symptoms, and among individuals with meningioma sustained unemployment after surgery was associated with depressive symptoms, results were otherwise disparate among SDOH and symptoms. Most studies were descriptive or exploratory, lacking comprehensive inclusion of SDOH. Standardizing SDOH collection, reducing bias, and recruiting diverse samples are recommended in future interventions.

Benchmarking palliative care practices in neurooncology: a german perspective

PURPOSE

To benchmark palliative care practices in neurooncology centers across Germany, evaluating the variability in palliative care integration, timing, and involvement in tumor board discussions. This study aims to identify gaps in care and contribute to the discourse on optimal palliative care strategies.

METHODS

A survey targeting both German Cancer Society-certified and non-certified university neurooncology centers was conducted to explore palliative care frameworks and practices for neurooncological patients. The survey included questions on palliative care department availability, involvement in tumor boards, timing of palliative care integration, and use of standardized screening tools for assessing palliative burden and psycho-oncological distress.

RESULTS

Of 57 centers contacted, 46 responded (81% response rate). Results indicate a dedicated palliative care department in 76.1% of centers, with palliative specialists participating in tumor board discussions at 34.8% of centers. Variability was noted in the initiation of palliative care, with early integration at the diagnosis stage in only 30.4% of centers. The survey highlighted a significant lack of standardized spiritual care assessments and minimal use of advanced care planning. Discrepancies were observed in the documentation and treatment of palliative care symptoms and social complaints, underscoring the need for comprehensive care approaches.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights a diverse landscape of palliative care provision within German neurooncology centers, underscoring the need for more standardized practices and early integration of palliative care. It suggests the necessity for standardized protocols and guidelines to enhance palliative care's quality and uniformity, ultimately improving patient-centered care in neurooncology.

Palliative Care in Neuro-oncology: an Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

While the benefits of palliative care for patients with cancer are well established, palliative care in neuro-oncology is still in its early stages. However, in recent years, there has been increasing attention drawn to the need for better palliative care for patients with brain tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a growing body of literature demonstrating the high symptom burden and significant supportive care and information needs of these patients and their caregivers. In the area of caregiver needs, the last 3 years has seen a more rapid growth in recognizing and characterizing these needs. However, there remains a knowledge gap regarding the optimal means of addressing these needs. In this article, we outline important recent advances in the literature on palliative care for patients with brain tumors and highlight areas in need of greater attention and investigation.

The concept of spirituality in the context of Chinese patients with cancer: A scoping review

AIM

To elucidate how the concept of spirituality has been addressed in studies with Chinese people with cancer.

DESIGN

A scoping review.

METHODS

Patterns in conceptual definitions of spirituality and indicators for measuring spirituality were analysed.

DATA SOURCES (INCLUDE SEARCH DATES)

Literature published from inception to August 2022 was searched in five electronic databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and a Chinese database).

RESULTS

Using data from 10 qualitative studies, a new taxonomy of concepts of spirituality among Chinese people with cancer was derived, consisting of four categories: Creation of meaning, Connection, Transcendence and Existence. A total of 12 instruments developed outside of Chinese contexts and used to measure dimensions of spirituality across 27 quantitative studies were compared to the taxonomy developed in this review, and patterns were identified according to the dimensions of spirituality. Several instruments required modifications or additional explanations in questions regarding God/Higher Power and religion.

CONCLUSION

The four categories of spirituality classified in the current review are considered universal across all cultural contexts. Spirituality is multidimensional and functional concept, and the components of the instruments differed depending on which dimension of spirituality was being measured.

IMPACT

The findings of this study suggest that for measuring spirituality in research and clinical settings with Chinese people with cancer, it is important to use culturally appropriate scales that are consistent with the dimensions of spirituality being measured.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Even instruments developed outside of the Chinese context could be used for Chinese people with cancer if appropriately selected for their intended use.

REPORTING METHOD

This paper adheres to the EQUATOR guidelines and has no direct patient or public contribution.

The need to consider return to work as a main outcome in patients undergoing surgery for diffuse low-grade glioma: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

For a long time, return to work (RTW) has been neglected in patients harboring a diffuse low-grade glioma (LGG). However, a majority of LGG patients worked at time of diagnosis. Moreover, these patients now live longer given current treatment paradigms, especially thanks to early maximal surgery.

METHODS

We systematically searched available medical databases for studies that reported data on RTW in patients who underwent resection for LGG.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies were selected: 19 considered RTW (especially rate and timing) as an outcome and 11 used scales of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) which included work-related aspects. Series that considered RTW as a main endpoint were composed of 1014 patients, with postoperative RTW rates ranging from 31 to 97.1% (mean 73.1%). Timing to RTW ranged from 15 days to 22 months (mean 6.3 months). Factors related to an increased proportion of RTW were: younger age, better neurologic status, having a white-collar occupation, working pre-operatively, being the sole breadwinner, the use of awake surgery, and greater extent of resection. Female sex, older age, poor neurologic status, pre-operative history of work absences, slow lexical access speed, and postoperative seizures were negatively related to RTW. No studies that used HRQoL scales directly investigated RTW rate or timing.

CONCLUSIONS

RTW was scarcely analyzed in LGG patients who underwent resection. However, because they are usually young, with no or only mild functional deficits and have a longer life expectancy, postoperative RTW should be assessed more systematically and accurately as a main outcome. As majority (61.5-100%) of LGG patients were working at time of surgery, the responsibility of neurosurgeons is to bring these patients back to their previous activities according to his/her wishes. RTW might also be included as a critical endpoint for future prospective studies and randomized control trials on LGGs.

The burden of a brain tumor: guiding patient centric care in neuro-oncology

PURPOSE

Brain tumor patients report an overwhelming sense of uncertainty when navigating the course of their terminal disease. Historically, organizational experts and/or treating physicians have established neuro-oncology programs. However, given the disease burden and incurable nature of current medical treatments, patient-centric care should be prioritized alongside institutional and academic objectives. Integrating patient perspectives into interdisciplinary programmatic development can improve comprehensive care and empower patients to advocate for their own quality healthcare needs.

METHODS

Data was derived from four focus groups with adult brain tumor patients (N = 15; M_age = 46 years, 53% female). A trained moderator led each 90-min group and posed semi-structured questions regarding patients' care needs throughout their neuro-oncological disease trajectory. Emphasis was placed on quality of life and psychological distress reduction for both patients and their loved ones. Common themes were identified via thematic content analysis using NVivo software. A high inter-rater reliability (M_kappa = 0.92, range= 0.85-0.93) was achieved.

RESULTS

Six distinct themes emerged, where the frequency of each theme ranged from 12.5 to 23.3%. Specifically, patients discussed relational concerns, navigation of interdisciplinary care, neurobehavioral impacts, emotional responses to stressors, existential concerns, and caregiver support. A discussion of themes follows.

CONCLUSIONS

It is imperative that we include the patient perspective in the development of neuro-oncology programs; considering the quality of survival in addition to quantity. Neuro-oncology quality care themes identified were relational concerns, navigating interdisciplinary care, neurobehavioral impact, emotional response to stressors, existential concerns, and caregiver support. A paramount concentration for comprehensive neuro-oncology programs must include patients' quality needs.