Real-World Study of Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes Among Patients with KRAS p.G12C-Mutated or Other KRAS Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The emerging role of Sotorasib plus Panitumumab combination therapy in colorectal cancer treatment

Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a substantial global health challenge, ranking as the third most commonly diagnosed and second most fatal cancer worldwide. With an increasing incidence, particularly in older populations, CRC demands innovative therapeutic approaches to address the limitations of existing treatments. One critical target in CRC is the KRAS gene, which is frequently mutated and implicated in various cancer-related processes. This narrative review explores the promising role of Sotorasib plus Panitumumab combination therapy in CRC treatment. Combining Sotorasib with Panitumumab, an EGFR antagonist, offers a synergistic approach to comprehensively block KRAS and EGFR pathways, potentially overcoming resistance mechanisms observed in monotherapies. The review discusses the evolution of CRC treatment from traditional chemotherapy to the advent of targeted therapies like Bevacizumab and Cetuximab. It highlights the limitations of existing therapies, including resistance and toxicities, emphasising the urgency for innovative approaches. The CodeBreak clinical trials, specifically CodeBreak 101 and CodeBreak 300, provide a focal point for evaluating the efficacy of Sotorasib plus Panitumumab in patients with refractory KRAS G12C-mutated mCRC. Preliminary results demonstrate significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates, suggesting a paradigm shift in CRC treatment. The preliminary findings from the CodeBreak 300 trial signify a transformative impact of Sotorasib plus Panitumumab in refractory KRAS G12C-mutated mCRC. With a notable increase in PFS and objective response rates and a well-tolerated safety profile, this combination therapy emerges as a potential new standard of care. The results present an optimistic outlook for patients resistant to conventional therapies.

A Narrative Review of RAS Mutations in Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third-most common cancer globally and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. While the prognostic and predictive roles of RAS mutations in advanced CRC are well-established, their significance in early-stage CRC remains a topic of debate. Studies have been conducted for many years on clinical and pathological parameters that may be associated with RAS mutation, and there are inconsistent results in this regard. Currently, the only biomarker used in early-stage CRC is microsatellite status. KRAS mutations are detected in 40-50% of patients with colorectal cancer. RAS activating mutations cause loss of EGFR regulation by acting on the RAS/RAF/MAPK signaling pathways. In advanced colorectal cancer, these mechanisms cause a decrease in the effectiveness of EGFR inhibitors. However, studies on patients with early-stage colorectal cancer have inconsistent results. This review highlights the prognostic and clinical significance of KRAS mutations in early-stage CRC, particularly in MSS tumors. In the MSS group, KRAS mutations were associated with shorter TTR and OS compared to DWT patients. In contrast, in the MSI-H group, KRAS mutations showed no prognostic effect in TTR and OS. However. KRAS mutations were associated with shorter SAR in both MSI-H and MSS groups of patients. The findings underscore the need for routine molecular profiling, including KRAS and MSI status, to refine risk stratification and guide adjuvant therapy decisions. Further studies are warranted to explore targeted therapeutic approaches for KRAS-mutant CRC in the adjuvant setting.

Late-line options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a review and evidence-based algorithm

Over the past few years, several novel systemic treatments have emerged for patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, thus making selection of the most effective later-line therapy a challenge for medical oncologists. Over the past decade, regorafenib and trifluridine-tipiracil were the only available drugs and often provided limited clinical benefit compared to best supportive care. Results from subsequent practice-changing trials opened several novel therapeutic avenues, both for unselected patients (such as trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab or fruquintinib) and for subgroups defined by the presence of actionable alterations in their tumours (such as HER2-targeted therapies or KRASG12C inhibitors) or with no acquired mechanisms of resistance to the previously received targeted agents in circulating tumour DNA (such as retreatment with anti-EGFR antibodies). In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of advances in the field over the past few years and offer a practical perspective on translation of the most relevant results into the daily management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using an evidence-based algorithm. Finally, we discuss some of the most appealing ongoing areas of research and highlight approaches with the potential to further expand the therapeutic armamentarium.

KRASG12D-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Clinical, Molecular, Immunologic, and Prognostic Features of a New Emerging Targeted Alteration

PURPOSE

KRASG12D mutation (mut) occurs in about 10%-12% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Recently, novel KRASG12D inhibitors have been developed and are currently under investigation in phase I/II clinical trials in solid tumors including mCRC. We aimed at performing a comprehensive characterization of clinical, molecular, immunologic, and prognostic features of KRASG12D-mutated mCRC to inform the design and the interpretation of future trials.

METHODS

We performed a pooled analysis of phase III TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies comparing 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI)/bevacizumab (bev) to doublets (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin or 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan)/bev.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six (16%) of 854 patients with available KRASG12D mutational status were KRASG12D mutated. KRASG12D-mutated patients had more frequently right-sided primary tumor and were less likely to present liver-only metastases with respect to other RAS mutated and all-wild-type (wt) patients. Compared with the BRAFV600E-mutated group, KRASG12D-mutated patients had more frequently left-sided primary tumor, resected primary tumor at the time of diagnosis, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0. KRASG12D-mutated patients had better prognosis than BRAFV600E-mutated and worse prognosis than all wt patients. No prognostic difference was evident between KRASG12D mut and other RAS mut patients overall or according to other specific KRAS or NRAS hotspot mutations. No interaction effect was observed between KRASG12D mut and the benefit provided by FOLFOXIRI/bev compared with doublets/bev. PIK3CA mut were reported more frequently among KRASG12D-mutated tumors compared with both other RAS mut and all wt.

CONCLUSION

A detail estimation of KRASG12D mut mCRC patients' characteristics and expected outcomes may be useful when planning future studies in this subgroup. The high prevalence of PI3K/PTEN/Akt pathway activating alterations may affect the efficacy of targeted strategies.

Clinicopathological, molecular, and prognostic features of colorectal carcinomas with KRAS c.34G>T (p.G12C) mutation

Evidence indicates that combinations of anti-EGFR antibodies and KRAS p.G12C (c.34G>T) inhibitors can be an effective treatment strategy for advanced colorectal cancer. We hypothesized that KRAS c.34G>T (p.G12C)-mutated colorectal carcinoma might be a distinct tumor subtype. We utilized a prospective cohort incident tumor biobank (including 1347 colorectal carcinomas) and detected KRAS c.34G>T (p.G12C) mutation in 43 cases (3.2%) and other KRAS mutations (in codon 12, 13, 61, or 146) in 467 cases (35%). The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)-low prevalence was similarly higher in KRAS c.34G>T mutants (52%) and other KRAS mutants (49%) than in KRAS-wild-type tumors (31%). KRAS c.34G>T mutants showed higher CIMP-high prevalence (14%) and lower CIMP-negative prevalence (33%) compared with other KRAS mutants (6% and 45%, respectively; p = 0.0036). Similar to other KRAS mutants, KRAS c.34G>T-mutated tumors were associated with cecal location, non-microsatellite instability (MSI)-high status, BRAF wild type, and PIK3CA mutation when compared with KRAS-wild-type tumors. Compared with BRAF-mutated tumors, KRAS c.34G>T mutants showed more frequent LINE-1 hypomethylation, a biomarker for early-onset colorectal carcinoma. KRAS c.34G>T mutants were not associated with other features, including the tumor tissue abundance of Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. animalis), pks+ Escherichia coli, Bifidobacterium, or (enterotoxigenic) Bacteroides fragilis. Among 1122 BRAF-wild-type colorectal carcinomas, compared with KRAS-wild-type tumors, multivariable-adjusted colorectal cancer-specific mortality hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.82 (1.05-3.17) in KRAS c.34G>T (p.G12C)-mutated tumors (p = 0.035) and 1.57 (1.22-2.02) in other KRAS-mutated tumors (p = 0.0004). Our study provides novel evidence for clinical and tumor characteristics of KRAS c.34G>T (p.G12C)-mutated colorectal carcinoma.

KRAS G12C Inhibitors in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

KRAS mutations contribute substantially to the overall colorectal cancer burden and have long been a focus of drug development efforts. After a lengthy preclinical road, KRAS inhibition via the G12C allele has finally become a therapeutic reality. Unlike in NSCLC, early studies of KRAS inhibitors in CRC struggled to demonstrate single agent activity. Investigation into these tissue-specific treatment differences has led to a deeper understanding of the complexities of MAPK signaling and the diverse adaptive feedback responses to KRAS inhibition. EGFR reactivation has emerged as a principal resistance mechanism to KRAS inhibitor monotherapy. Thus, the field has pivoted to dual EGFR/KRAS blockade with promising efficacy. Despite significant strides in the treatment of KRAS G12C mutated CRC, new challenges are on the horizon. Alternative RTK reactivation and countless acquired molecular resistance mechanisms have shifted the treatment goalpost. This review focuses on the historical and contemporary clinical strategies of targeting KRAS G12C alterations in CRC and highlights future directions to overcome treatment challenges.

Clinical features associated with NeoRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer A SCRUM-Japan GOZILA substudy

"NeoRAS WT" refers to the loss of RAS mutations (MTs) following first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We evaluate the incidence and clinicopathological characteristics of NeoRAS WT mCRC using next-generation sequencing of plasma circulating tumor DNA. Patients with mCRC enrolled in the GOZILA study initially diagnosed with tissue RAS MT mCRC and received subsequent systemic therapy are eligible. NeoRAS WT is defined as the absence of detectable RAS MT in plasma and assessed in all eligible patients (Group A) and in a subgroup with at least one somatic alteration detected in plasma (Group B). Overall, 478 patients are included. NeoRAS WT prevalence is 19.0% (91/478) in Group A and 9.8% (42/429) in Group B. Absence of liver or lymph node metastasis and tissue RAS MTs other than KRAS exon 2 MTs are significantly associated with NeoRAS WT emergence. Overall, 1/6 and 2/6 patients with NeoRAS WT treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) show partial response and stable disease for ≥6 months, respectively. NeoRAS WT mCRC is observed at a meaningful prevalence, and anti-EGFR mAb-based therapy may be effective.

Efficacy and Safety of Adagrasib plus Cetuximab in Patients with KRASG12C-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Adagrasib, an irreversible, selective KRASG12C inhibitor, may be an effective treatment in KRASG12C-mutated colorectal cancer, particularly when combined with an anti-EGFR antibody. In this analysis of the KRYSTAL-1 trial, patients with previously treated KRASG12C-mutated unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer received adagrasib (600 mg twice daily) plus cetuximab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review. Ninety-four patients received adagrasib plus cetuximab. With a median follow-up of 11.9 months, ORR was 34.0%, disease control rate was 85.1%, and median duration of response was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2-7.6). Median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.7-7.4) and median overall survival was 15.9 months (95% CI, 11.8-18.8). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in all patients; grade 3-4 in 27.7% and no grade 5. No TRAEs led to adagrasib discontinuation. Exploratory analyses suggest circulating tumor DNA may identify features of response and acquired resistance.

SIGNIFICANCE

Adagrasib plus cetuximab demonstrates promising clinical activity and tolerable safety in heavily pretreated patients with unresectable or metastatic KRASG12C-mutated colorectal cancer. These data support a potential new standard of care and highlight the significance of testing and identification of KRASG12C mutations in patients with colorectal cancer. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 897.

Twelve-month progression-free survival with sotorasib and panitumumab in KRAS G12C mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third in global cancer prevalence, with 40% presenting as metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). KRAS mutations in mCRC patients confer resistance to anti-EGFR treatments. Promising inhibitors such as sotorasib and adagrasib targeting KRASG12C mutations have demonstrated efficacy. Herein, we present a heavily pretreated mCRC case with a progression-free survival of 12 months with sotorasib and panitumumab. In 2017, a 27-year-old male presented with abdominal pain and received a diagnosis of stage IIIC KRAS G12C mutant CRC. Following surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, he developed metastases in the liver and lungs in 2020. Treatment with FOLFIRINOX and bevacizumab, and later FOLFIRI and bevacizumab, with surgeries and local interventions resulted in partial responses. Upon disease progression, sotorasib and panitumumab were initiated, achieving a complete metabolic response. After 12 months of progression-free survival, oligoprogressive liver lesions were surgically resected. This case highlights the remarkable outcome of a heavily treated KRAS G12C mutant mCRC patient. The combination of sotorasib and panitumumab, along with multidisciplinary approaches including surgery and local interventions, played an important role in our patient's survival.

Dynamic nature of BRAF or KRAS p.G12C mutations in second-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer patients: do early and late effects exist?

INTRODUCTION

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling network aberrations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) generate intrinsic dynamic effects and temporal variations that are crucial but often overlooked in clinical trial populations. Here, we investigate the time-varying impact of MAPK pathway mutation genotype on each treatment line's contribution to the overall clinical course.

METHODS

The PROMETEO study focused on mCRC patients undergoing second-line treatment at 20 hospitals. We evaluated genotypes and employed flexible models to analyse the dynamic effect of each mutation.

RESULTS

We examined data derived from 1160 patients. The effects of KRAS G12C or G12V, and BRAF V600E are clearly time-varying, with unexpected consequences such as the deleterious effect of BRAF V600E vs other genotypes dissipating over time when subjects receive antiangiogenics, or KRAS G12V and G12C showing increasing aggressiveness over time. Thus, contrary to expectations, the 12-month survival rate from the second line for those who survived >6 months was 49.9% (95% CI, 32.7-67.3) for KRAS G12C and 59% (95% CI, 38.5-80.6) for BRAF V600E.

CONCLUSIONS

The dynamic perspective is essential for understanding the behaviour of tumours with specific genotypes, especially from the second line onward. This may be relevant in patient monitoring and treatment decision-making, particularly in cases with distinct mutations.

Association of KRAS G12C Status with Age at Onset of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The association of age at the onset of CRC and the prevalence of a KRAS G12C mutation is unclear. A retrospective, multicenter study evaluating metastatic CRC patients from January 2019 to July 2023, treated at the Oncoclinicas units and tested for tissue based KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in a centralized genomics lab. A mismatch repair (MMR) status was retrieved from different labs and electronic medical records, as were patient demographics (age, gender) and tumor sidedness. The chi-square test was used to examine the association between clinical and molecular variables, with p value < 0.05 being statistically significant. A total of 858 cases were included. The median age was 63.7 years (range 22-95) and 17.4% were less than 50 years old at the diagnosis of metastatic CRC. Male patients represented 50.3% of the population. The sidedness distribution was as follows: left side 59.2%, right side 36.8% and not specified 4%. The prevalence of the KRAS mutation was 49.4% and the NRAS mutation was 3.9%. Among KRAS mutated tumors, the most common variants were G12V (27.6%) and G12D (23.5%), while KRAS G12C was less frequent (6.4%), which represented 3.1% of the overall population. The BRAF mutant cases were 7.3% and most commonly V600E. Only five (<1%) non-V600E mutations were detected. MSI-high or dMMR was present in 14 cases (1.6%). In the age-stratified analysis, left-sidedness (p < 0.001) and a KRAS G12C mutation (p = 0.046) were associated with a younger age (<50 years). In the sidedness-stratified analysis, a BRAF mutation (p = 0.001) and MSI-high/dMMR status (p = 0.009) were more common in right-sided tumors. Our data suggest that KRAS G12C mutations are more frequent in early-onset metastatic CRC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest cohort in the Latin American population with metastatic CRC reporting RAS, BRAF and MSI/MMR status.

Unveiling the role of KRAS in tumor immune microenvironment

Kirsten rats sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS), the first discovered human oncogene, has long been recognized as "undruggable". KRAS mutations frequently occur in multiple human cancers including non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC), colorectal cancer(CRC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC), functioning as a "molecule switch" determining the activation of various oncogenic signaling pathways. Except for its intrinsic pro-tumorigenic role, KRAS alteration also exhibits an unique immune signature characterized by elevated PD-L1 level and high tumor mutational burden(TMB). KRAS mutation shape an immune suppressive microenvironment by impeding effective T cells infiltration and recruiting suppressive immune cells including myeloid-derived suppressor cells(MDSCs), regulatory T cells(Tregs), cancer associated fibroblasts(CAFs). In immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI) era, NSCLC patients with mutated KRAS tend to be more responsive to ICI than patients with intact KRAS. The hallmark for KRAS mutation is the existence of multiple kinds of co-mutations. Different types of co-alterations have distinct tumor microenvironment(TME) signatures and responses to ICI. TP53 co-mutation possess a "hot" TME and achieve higher response to immunotherapy while other loss of function mutation correlated with a "colder" TME and a poor outcome to ICI-based therapy. The groundbreaking discovery of KRAS G12C inhibitors significantly improved outcomes for this KRAS subtype even though efficacy was limited to NSCLC patients. KRAS G12C inhibitors also restore the suppressive TME, creating an opportunity for combinations with ICI. However, an inevitable challenge to KRAS inhibitors is drug resistance. Promising combination strategies such as combination with SHP2 is an approach deserve further exploration because of their immune modulatory effect.

Update on Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer remains a deadly malignancy and is the third leading cause of cancer-related death. The mainstay of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer is chemotherapy, but unfortunately, even with recent progress, overall survival is still poor. Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and the underlying genetic differences among tumors can define the behavior and prognosis of the disease. Given the limitations of cytotoxic chemotherapy, research has focused on developing targeted therapy based on molecular subtyping. Since the early 2000s, multiple targeted therapies have demonstrated efficacy in treating metastatic colorectal cancer and have received FDA approval. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and DNA mismatch repair pathways have demonstrated promising results for targeted therapies. As new gene mutations and proteins involved in the oncogenesis of metastatic colorectal cancer are identified, new targets will continue to emerge. We herein provide a summary of the updated literature regarding targeted therapies for patients with mCRC.

Sotorasib with panitumumab in chemotherapy-refractory KRASG12C-mutated colorectal cancer: a phase 1b trial

The current third-line (and beyond) treatment options for RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer have yielded limited efficacy. At the time of study start, the combination of sotorasib, a KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog)-G12C inhibitor, and panitumumab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, was hypothesized to overcome treatment-induced resistance. This phase 1b substudy of the CodeBreaK 101 master protocol evaluated sotorasib plus panitumumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory KRASG12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer. Here, we report the results in a dose-exploration cohort and a dose-expansion cohort. Patients received sotorasib (960 mg, once daily) plus panitumumab (6 mg kg-1, once every 2 weeks). The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included efficacy and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory biomarkers at baseline were assessed. Forty-eight patients (dose-exploration cohort, n = 8; dose-expansion cohort, n = 40) were treated. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade and grade ≥3 occurred in 45 (94%) and 13 (27%) patients, respectively. In the dose-expansion cohort, the confirmed objective response rate was 30.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 16.6%, 46.5%). Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI 4.2, 7.7 months). Median overall survival was 15.2 months (95% CI 12.5 months, not estimable). Prevalent genomic coalterations included APC (84%), TP53 (74%), SMAD4 (33%), PIK3CA (28%) and EGFR (26%). Sotorasib-panitumumab demonstrated acceptable safety with promising efficacy in chemotherapy-refractory KRASG12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04185883 .

Integrated budget impact model to estimate the impact of introducing selpercatinib as a tumor-agnostic treatment option for patients with RET-altered solid tumors in the US

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the potential budget impact on US third party payers (commercial or Medicare) associated with addition of selpercatinib as a tumor-agnostic treatment for patients with Rearranged during Transfection (RET)-altered solid tumors.

METHODS

An integrated budget impact model (iBIM) with 3-year (Y) time horizon was developed for 19 RET-altered tumors. It is referred to as an integrated model because it is a single model that integrated results across multiple tumor types (as opposed to tumor-specific models developed traditionally). The model estimated eligible patient populations and included tumor-specific comparator treatments for each tumor type. Estimated annual total costs (2022USD, $) included costs of drug, administration, supportive care, and toxicity. For a one-million-member plan, the number of patients with RET-altered tumors eligible for treatment, incremental total costs, and incremental per-member per-month (PMPM) costs associated with introduction of selpercatinib treatment were estimated. Uncertainty associated with model parameters was assessed using various sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Commercial perspective estimated 11.68 patients/million with RET-altered tumors as treatment-eligible annually, of which 7.59 (Y1), 8.17 (Y2), and 8.76 (Y3) patients would be selpercatinib-treated (based on forecasted market share). The associated incremental total and PMPM costs (commercial) were estimated to be: $873,099 and $0.073 (Y1), $2,160,525 and $0.180 (Y2), and $2,561,281 and $0.213 (Y3), respectively. The Medicare perspective estimated 55.82 patients/million with RET-altered tumors as treatment-eligible annually, of which 36.29 (Y1), 39.08 (Y2), and 41.87 (Y3) patients would be selpercatinib-treated. The associated incremental total and PMPM costs (Medicare) were estimated to be: $4,447,832 and $0.371 (Y1), $11,076,422 and $0.923 (Y2), and $12,637,458 and $1.053 (Y3), respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses across both perspectives identified drug costs, selpercatinib market share, incidence of RET, and treatment duration as significant drivers of incremental costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-year incremental PMPM cost estimates suggest a modest impact on payer-budgets associated with introduction of tumor-agnostic selpercatinib treatment.

Sotorasib plus Panitumumab in Refractory Colorectal Cancer with Mutated KRAS G12C

BACKGROUND

KRAS G12C is a mutation that occurs in approximately 3 to 4% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Monotherapy with KRAS G12C inhibitors has yielded only modest efficacy. Combining the KRAS G12C inhibitor sotorasib with panitumumab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, may be an effective strategy.

METHODS

In this phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial, we assigned patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer with mutated KRAS G12C who had not received previous treatment with a KRAS G12C inhibitor to receive sotorasib at a dose of 960 mg once daily plus panitumumab (53 patients), sotorasib at a dose of 240 mg once daily plus panitumumab (53 patients), or the investigator's choice of trifluridine-tipiracil or regorafenib (standard care; 54 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Key secondary end points were overall survival and objective response.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 7.8 months (range, 0.1 to 13.9), the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2 to 6.3) and 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.8) in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab and 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab groups, respectively, as compared with 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.9) in the standard-care group. The hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab group as compared with the standard-care group was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.80; P = 0.006), and the hazard ratio in the 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab group was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.93; P = 0.03). Overall survival data are maturing. The objective response was 26.4% (95% CI, 15.3 to 40.3), 5.7% (95% CI, 1.2 to 15.7), and 0% (95% CI, 0.0 to 6.6) in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab, 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab, and standard-care groups, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 35.8%, 30.2%, and 43.1% of patients, respectively. Skin-related toxic effects and hypomagnesemia were the most common adverse events observed with sotorasib-panitumumab.

CONCLUSIONS

In this phase 3 trial of a KRAS G12C inhibitor plus an EGFR inhibitor in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer, both doses of sotorasib in combination with panitumumab resulted in longer progression-free survival than standard treatment. Toxic effects were as expected for either agent alone and resulted in few discontinuations of treatment. (Funded by Amgen; CodeBreaK 300 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05198934.).

Prevalence of KRAS G12C Mutation and Co-mutations and Associated Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review

PURPOSE

A systematic literature review was conducted to estimate the global prevalence of Kirsten rat sarcoma virus gene (KRAS) mutations, with an emphasis on the clinically significant KRAS G12C mutation, and to estimate the prognostic significance of these mutations in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

DESIGN

Relevant English-language publications in the Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library databases (from 2009 to 2021) and congress presentations (from 2016 to 2021) were reviewed. Eligible studies were those that reported the prevalence and clinical outcomes of the KRAS G12C mutation in patients with CRC.

RESULTS

A total of 137 studies (interventional [n = 8], post hoc analyses of randomized clinical trials [n = 6], observational [n = 122], and longitudinal [n =1]) were reviewed. Sixty-eight studies reported the prevalence of KRAS mutations (KRASm) in 42 810 patients with CRC. The median global prevalence of KRASm was 38% (range, 13.3%-58.9%) and that of the KRAS G12C mutation (KRAS G12C) 3.1% (range, 0.7%-14%). Available evidence suggests that KRASm are possibly more common in tumors that develop on the right side of the colon. Limited evidence suggests a lower objective response rate and inferior disease-free/relapse-free survival in patients with KRAS G12C compared with patients with KRASwt or other KRASm.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis reveals that KRAS G12C is prevalent in 3% of patients with CRC. Available evidence suggests a poor prognosis for patients with KRAS G12C. Right-sided tumors were more likely to harbor KRASm; however, their role in determining clinical outcomes needs to be investigated further.

Different prognostic values of KRAS exon 2 submutations and BRAF V600E mutation in microsatellite stable (MSS) and unstable (MSI) stage III colon cancer: an ACCENT/IDEA pooled analysis of seven trials

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of KRAS and BRAFV600E mutations in stage III colon cancer (CC) remains controversial and has never been clearly analyzed in patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors due to sample size limitations. Data are also lacking for KRAS submutations and prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined clinicopathological variables and prognosis in patients with surgically resected stage III CC who participated in seven clinical trials from the ACCENT/IDEA databases. Associations between KRAS exon 2 and BRAFV600E mutations and time to recurrence (TTR), overall survival (OS), and survival after recurrence (SAR) were assessed using a Cox model. We also analyzed the prognostic value of KRAS exon 2 submutations.

RESULTS

Among 8460 patients, 11.4% had MSI-H status. In the MSI-H group, BRAFV600E, KRAS exon 2 mutants, and double-wild-type statuses were detected in 40.6%, 18.1%, and 41.3%, respectively, whereas and in the microsatellite stable (MSS) group, these were detected in 7.7%, 38.6%, and 53.8%, respectively. In the MSS group, 5-year TTR rates of 61.8%, 66.3%, and 72.9% were observed among patients with BRAFV600E, KRAS exon 2 mutants, and those who were DWT, respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.58 and 1.31, both P < 0.001]. In the MSI-H group, 5-year TTR rates did not differ significantly among the mutated subgroups. Similar results were found for OS. However, survival after relapse was significantly shorter in the KRAS exon 2- and BRAFV600E-mutated patients in both MSS (adjusted HR = 2.06 and 1.15; both P < 0.05) and MSI-H (adjusted HR = 1.99 and 1.81; both P < 0.05) groups. In the MSS group, KRAS exon 2 mutations were associated with TTR, but only p.G12C, p.G12D, and p.G13D were associated with poor outcomes after disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing for both KRAS and BRAFV600E mutations in stage III patients should be considered as they can better define individual patient prognosis, and may also enable patient selection for (neo)adjuvant trials dedicated to specific molecular subtypes with poor prognosis.

Time to recurrence and its relation to survival after recurrence in patients resected for stage III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

It is intuitively thought that early relapse is associated with poor survival after recurrence (SAR) in resected colon cancer (CC) patients, but this has never been formally studied.

METHODS

We pooled data from stage III patients treated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy in two phase III trials, to analyse time to recurrence (TTR) and its relationship with SAR. TTR and SAR were also studied according to molecular status (mismatch repair (MMR), RAS, and BRAFV600E). Early relapsing patients were defined as patients having a TTR event within 12 months after starting adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

4548 stage III CC patients were included in the present analysis. Deficient MMR (dMMR) CC patients experienced fewer recurrences than proficient (p)MMR CC patients (18.8% versus 27.6%) but had a significantly shorter median TTR (mTTR; 0.74 versus 1.40 years, p < 0.0001). In pMMR patients, BRAF and RAS mutations were also associated with earlier mTTR as compared to double wild-type (WT) patients (0.99 versus 1.38 versus 1.54 years, respectively, p < 0.0001). Early recurrence occurred in 397 patients and was associated with a median SAR (2.2 versus 3.3 years, p = 0.0007). However, this association was mainly due to pMMR/RAS and BRAFV600E mutated tumours and was not confirmed in dMMR and pMMR/double WT subgroups.

CONCLUSION

In resected stage III CC treated with standard oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy, TTR varies between dMMR, pMMR/RAS, or BRAFV600E mutated and pMMR/double WT tumours. In addition, early relapse is associated with poor survival, mainly due to patients resected for a pMMR/RAS or BRAFV600E mutated tumour.

Prognostic and therapeutic impact of the KRAS G12C mutation in colorectal cancer

KRAS G12C mutations are critical in the pathogenesis of multiple cancer types, including non-small cell lung (NSCLC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and colorectal (CRC) cancers. As such, they have increasingly become a target of novel therapies in the management of these malignancies. However, the therapeutic success of KRAS G12C inhibitors to date has been far more limited in CRC and PDAC than NSCLC. In this review, we briefly summarize the biochemistry of KRAS targeting and treatment resistance, highlight differences in the epidemiology of various G12C-mutated cancers, and provide an overview of the published data on KRAS G12C inhibitors for various indications. We conclude with a summary of ongoing clinical trials in G12C-mutant CRC and a discussion of future directions in the management of this disease. KRAS G12C mutation, targeted therapies, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, drug development.

KRAS p.G12C Mutation in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Prognostic Implications and Advancements in Targeted Therapies

KRAS is frequently mutated in tumors. It is mutated in approximately 30% of all cancer cases and in nearly 50% of cases of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), which is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Recent advancements in understanding CRC biology and genetics have highlighted the significance of KRAS mutations in the progression of CRC. The KRAS gene encodes a small GTPase (Guanosine TriPhosphatases) that plays a key role in signaling pathways associated with important proteins involved in amplifying growth factor and receptor signals. Mutations in KRAS are frequently observed in codons 12 and 13, and these mutations have oncogenic properties. Abnormal activation of KRAS proteins strongly stimulates signals associated with various cancer-related processes in CRC, including cell proliferation, migration and neoangiogenesis. In this review, we explore the distinct prognostic implications of KRAS mutations. Specifically, the KRAS p.G12C mutation is associated with a worse prognosis in metastatic CRC. The correlation between structure, conformation and mutations is visually presented to emphasize how alterations in individual amino acids at the same position in a single protein can unexpectedly exhibit complex involvement in cancer. Last, KRAS p.G12C is discussed as an emerging and promising therapeutic target in metastatic CRC, providing a concise overview of available clinical data regarding the use of new inhibitors.

Targeting KRASG12C in colorectal cancer: the beginning of a new era

RAS mutation is considered one of the most relevant oncogenic drivers in human cancers. Unfortunately, for more than three decades, RAS has been considered an undruggable target. Recently, the discovery of selective and potent KRAS^G12C inhibitors represented a light at the end of the tunnel. Indeed, sotorasib and adagrasib proved clinical activity in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer harboring KRAS^G12C mutation; however, responses are lower than expected, suggesting the presence of intrinsic resistance. Consequently, novel combinatory strategies to disrupt the RAS signaling pathways are under clinical investigation. This review aims to discuss the current knowledge and novel routes of KRAS^G12C inhibition in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Adagrasib with or without Cetuximab in Colorectal Cancer with Mutated KRAS G12C

BACKGROUND

Adagrasib, an oral small-molecule inhibitor of mutant KRAS G12C protein, has shown clinical activity in pretreated patients with several tumor types, including colorectal cancer. Preclinical studies suggest that combining a KRAS G12C inhibitor with an epidermal growth factor receptor antibody could be an effective clinical strategy.

METHODS

In this phase 1-2, open-label, nonrandomized clinical trial, we assigned heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with mutant KRAS G12C to receive adagrasib monotherapy (600 mg orally twice daily) or adagrasib (at the same dose) in combination with intravenous cetuximab once a week (with an initial loading dose of 400 mg per square meter of body-surface area, followed by a dose of 250 mg per square meter) or every 2 weeks (with a dose of 500 mg per square meter). The primary end points were objective response (complete or partial response) and safety.

RESULTS

As of June 16, 2022, a total of 44 patients had received adagrasib, and 32 had received combination therapy with adagrasib and cetuximab, with a median follow-up of 20.1 months and 17.5 months, respectively. In the monotherapy group (43 evaluable patients), a response was reported in 19% of the patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 8 to 33). The median response duration was 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.3 to 8.3), and the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 8.3). In the combination-therapy group (28 evaluable patients), the response was 46% (95% CI, 28 to 66). The median response duration was 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.7 to not estimable), and the median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 8.1). The percentage of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 34% in the monotherapy group and 16% in the combination-therapy group. No grade 5 adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Adagrasib had antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with mutant KRAS G12C, both as oral monotherapy and in combination with cetuximab. The median response duration was more than 6 months in the combination-therapy group. Reversible adverse events were common in the two groups. (Funded by Mirati Therapeutics; KRYSTAL-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03785249.).

Current concepts of anti-EGFR targeting in metastatic colorectal cancer

Anti-EGFR targeting is one of the key strategies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). For almost two decades oncologists have struggled to implement EGFR antibodies in the mCRC continuum of care. Both sidedness and RAS mutational status rank high among the predictive factors for the clinical efficacy of EGFR inhibitors. A prospective phase III trial has recently confirmed that anti-EGFR targeting confers an overall survival benefit only in left sided RAS-wildtype tumors when given in first line. It is a matter of discussion if more clinical benefit can be reached by considering putative primary resistance mechanisms (e.g., HER2, BRAF, PIK3CA, etc.) at this early stage of treatment. The value of this procedure in daily routine clinical utility has not yet been clearly delineated. Re-exposure to EGFR antibodies becomes increasingly crucial in the disease journey of mCRC. Yet re- induction or re-challenge strategies have been problematic as they relied on mathematical models that described the timely decay of EGFR antibody resistant clones. The advent of liquid biopsy and the implementation of more accurate next-generation sequencing (NGS) based high throughput methods allows for tracing of EGFR resistant clones in real time. These displays the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of metastatic disease compared to the former standard radiographic assessment and re-biopsy. These techniques may move EGFR inhibition in mCRC into the area of precision medicine in order to apply EGFR antibodies with the increase or decrease of EGFR resistant clones. This review critically discusses established concepts of tackling the EGFR pathway in mCRC and provides insight into the growing field of liquid biopsy guided personalized approaches of EGFR inhibition in mCRC.

Clinical efficacy of sequential treatments in KRASG12C-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: findings from a real-life multicenter Italian study (CRC-KR GOIM)

BACKGROUND

The presence of KRASG12C mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) correlates with poor outcome. Although different selective inhibitors are under clinical development, the optimal treatment remains uncertain. Thus, we conducted a retrospective analysis in a large cohort of patients with KRASG12C mCRC treated in 12 Italian oncology units.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with unresectable mCRC harboring KRASG12C mutation receiving a first-line chemotherapy doublet or triplet between 2011 and 2021 were included in the study. Evaluation of overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

A total of 256/6952 (3.7%) patients with mCRC displayed KRASG12C mutation; of these, 111 met the inclusion criteria. The ORR of first-line therapy was 38.7% (43/111). Median PFS (mPFS) was 9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.5-10.5 months]. After progression, only 62% and 36% of the patients are fit to receive second or third lines of treatment, with limited clinical benefit. Median OS (mOS) was 21 months (95% CI 17.4-24.6 months). In patients receiving first-line triplet chemotherapy, ORR was 56.3% (9/16), mPFS was 13 months (95% CI 10.3-15.7 months) and mOS was 32 months (95% CI 7.7-56.3 months). For irinotecan-based doublets, ORR was 34.5 (10/29), mPFS was 9 months (95% CI 6.4-11.6 months) and mOS was 22 months (95% CI 16.0-28.0 months). With oxaliplatin-based doublets ORR was 36.4% (24/62), mPFS was 7 months (95% CI 4.6-9.4 months) and mOS was 18 months (95% CI, 13.6-22.4 months).

CONCLUSION

Patients with KRASG12C-mutant mCRC had a disappointing response to standard treatments. Within the limitations of a retrospective study, these results suggest that first-line chemotherapy intensification with FOLFOXIRI is a valid option in fit patients.

The Impact of KRAS Mutational Status on Long-Term Survival following Liver Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

KRAS mutation is reportedly associated with poor prognosis in patients with different cancer types. However, mutational data on hilar cholangiocarcinoma are few and controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of KRAS mutations in a single-center homogeneous population resected for hilar cholangiocarcinoma and the subsequent impact on prognosis. KRAS mutation status was evaluated in 54 patients undergoing major hepatectomy combined with resection of the main biliary confluence and regional lymphadenectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2001 and 2019. Among these 54 patients, 12 (22.2%) had a KRAS mutation. KRAS mutation was not related with pathologic characteristics of the tumor. Five-year overall survival (OS) in patients with KRAS mutation was significantly lower than that observed in patients with KRAS wild type (0 vs. 49.2%, respectively; p = 0.003). In the multivariable analysis; independent predictors of poor OS were KRAS mutation (HR = 5.384; p = 0.003) and lymph node metastases (HR = 2.805; p = 0.023). The results of our study suggested that KRAS mutation in hilar cholangiocarcinoma was not rarely observed. KRAS mutation was an independent strong predictor of poor OS. KRAS mutation analysis should be included in the routine pathologic evaluation of resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma in order to better stratify prognosis.