Larotrectinib Treatment for Patients With TRK Fusion-Positive Salivary Gland Cancers

Clinical trials for patients with salivary gland cancers: A systematic review of worldwide registers and an evaluation of current challenges

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials (CT) are crucial for generating scientific evidence and improving clinical outcomes, but they can be challenging in the context of rare cancers. Salivary gland cancers (SGC) are rare and heterogeneous tumors, without standard-of-care approved systemic therapies. We analyzed completed and ongoing CTs to assess the current state of clinical research activity in the field.

METHODS

ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO-ICTRP, HealthCanadaCT were searched for antineoplastic pharmacological and interventional CT involving patients with SGC from the trials database creation until August 6th, 2024. CT characteristics and status were collected.

RESULTS

134 clinical trials met inclusion criteria. Of these, 78 % were sponsored by non-industry entities. 49 % were conducted at only one site, and 61 % at up to five centers. Only 25 trials (19 %) were multinational, being 15 industry-sponsored, a significantly higher proportion compared to non-industry-sponsored trials(p < 0.01). 16 % CTs were umbrella or basket, and 6 % were randomized, again predominantly industry-sponsored(p < 0.01). Regarding SGC-specific trials, 32 % were open to all patients with SGC, regardless of specific histology. Patients with adenoid cystic, salivary duct, and mucoepidermoid carcinoma had access to 92 %, 66 % and 62 % of trials, respectively. 88 % CT targeted palliative setting, and 38 % incorporated predictive biomarkers. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors were the most studied therapy(26 %), followed by immunotherapy(15 %), chemotherapy and antibody-drug conjugate(12 % each) and androgen-blockade(8 %), among others.

CONCLUSION

Clinical research for patients with SGC relies mainly in non-industry organisations, most of them limited to run trials in one to five sites, in a single country. Further collaboration between investigators is needed, as well as reconsidering inclusion criteria and trial designs.

Advances in Targeted and Systemic Therapy for Salivary Gland Carcinomas: Current Options and Future Directions

Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) represent a rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies accounting for 3-6% of all head and neck cancers. While surgical resection and radiotherapy remain the standard for locoregional control, systemic treatment is indicated for recurrent or metastatic disease. Advances in molecular profiling have identified actionable targets such as NTRK gene fusions, HER2, immune checkpoint regulators, androgen receptors, and RET receptors. These have facilitated the development of targeted therapies, including TRK inhibitors, HER2-directed agents, and androgen receptor modulators, as well as emerging combinations of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Despite these advancements, challenges such as resistance mechanisms and limited therapeutic efficacy persist. Overall response rates remain relatively low across most systemic therapies, reflecting a persistent unmet clinical need. This review discusses the current landscape of treatment options and explores promising clinical trials and future directions to enhance outcomes for patients with SGCs.

Salivary Gland Cancers in the Era of Molecular Analysis: The Role of Tissue and Liquid Biomarkers

Background: Salivary gland cancers (SGCs) are a rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies, accounting for approximately 5% of head and neck cancers. Despite their rarity, advances in molecular profiling have revealed a variety of genetic and molecular pathways, many of which are potentially actionable with targeted therapies. Methods: We reviewed the current literature involving the molecular landscape of SGCs, encompassing the diagnostic and prognostic value of tissue and liquid biomarkers and the potential therapeutic targets across various histological subtypes. Results: Our review highlights key molecular diagnostic findings such as the CRTC1-MAML2 fusion in mucoepidermoid carcinoma and MYB-NFIB rearrangements in adenoid cystic carcinoma, but also targetable alterations such as HER2 and AR positivity in salivary duct carcinoma and ETV6-NTRK3 fusion in secretory carcinoma. Liquid biopsy (both blood- or salivary-based), including circulating tumor DNA, circulating tumor cells, and miRNAs, offers novel, noninvasive approaches for disease monitoring and personalized treatment. Emerging therapies such as HER2 inhibitors, androgen deprivation therapy, and TRK inhibitors underscore the shift towards precision oncology in managing these malignancies. Conclusions: Despite promising advances, challenges remain due to the rarity and phenotypic heterogeneity of SGCs, emphasizing the need for molecularly stratified clinical trials. This review presents an overview of tissue and liquid biomarkers, focusing on molecular targets and therapeutic innovations that lay the foundation for improved diagnostic and treatment strategies for SGCs.

Precision Oncology Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Phase II Clinical Trials with Biomarker-Driven, Adaptive Design

Novel clinical trial designs are conducted in the precision medicine era. This study aimed to evaluate biomarker-driven, adaptive phase II trials in precision oncology, focusing on infrastructure, efficacy, and safety. We systematically reviewed and analyzed the target studies. EMBASE and PubMed searches from 2015 to 2023 generated 29 eligible trials. Data extraction included infrastructure, biomarker screening methodologies, efficacy, and safety profiles. Government agencies, cancer hospitals, and academic societies with accumulated experiences led investigator-initiated precision oncology clinical trials (IIPOCTs), which later guided sponsor-initiated precision oncology clinical trials (SIPOCTs). Most SIPOCTs were international studies with basket design. IIPOCTs primarily used the central laboratory for biomarker screening, but SIPOCTs used both central and local laboratories. Most of the studies adapted next-generation sequencing and/or immunohistochemistry for biomarker screening. Fifteen studies included an independent central review committee for outcome investigation. Efficacy assessments predominantly featured objective response rate as the primary endpoint, with varying results. Nine eligible studies contributed to the United States Food and Drug Administration's marketing authorization. Safety monitoring was rigorous, but reporting formats lacked uniformity. Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes were described in some protocols but rarely reported. Our results reveal that precision oncology trials with adaptive design rapidly and efficiently evaluate anticancer drugs' efficacy and safety, particularly in specified biomarker-driven cohorts. The evolution from IIPOCT to SIPOCT has facilitated fast regulatory approval, providing valuable insights into the precision oncology landscape.

PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in patients with recurrent or metastatic salivary gland carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective in some patients with salivary gland carcinoma (SGC), biomarkers which predict the efficacy and prognosis of SGC patients treated with pembrolizumab have not been identified. We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SGC and to determine optimal cut-off values of the combined positive score (CPS) and tumor proportion score (TPS) as numerical expression levels of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), which predict the efficacy of pembrolizumab. Furthermore, we investigated the association of patient characteristics and hematological markers with clinical outcomes, including overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). From 2016 to 2021, 27 patients were included in the analysis. ORR of SGC was 25.9%. Optimal cut-off values of CPS and TPS were 15 and 25%, respectively. ORRs of CPS-high and TPS-high were 55.6 and 75.0%, respectively, and significantly higher than those of CPS-low and TPS-low. Furthermore, patients with a low platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) had a significantly longer PFS. No grade 4 or greater adverse events were observed. This study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy and identified optimal cut-off values of CPS and TPS.

Salivary gland-type cancers: cross-organ demographics of a rare cancer

BACKGROUND

Salivary gland-type cancers (SGTCs) are histologically heterogeneous and can affect organs other than the salivary glands. Some tumors outside the salivary glands are diagnosed on their unique histological characteristics. Comprehensive cross-organ studies on SGTCs are limited.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC), acinic cell carcinoma (AcCC), and polymorphous adenocarcinoma (PAC) who visited our institution between 2009 and 2019. The primary tumor sites were classified into four categories; major salivary glands, head/neck (H/N) excluding (exc) major salivary glands (MSG) regions, broncho-pulmonary regions, and "others". H/N exc MSG was further divided into three subcategories, nasal/paranasal sinus, oral and pharynx/larynx.

RESULTS

We identified 173 patients with SGTCs, with SDC, AdCC, MEC, EMC, AcCC, and PAC accounting for 20%, 42%, 27%, 3%, 8%, and 1% of the cases, respectively. The most frequent primary site was the major salivary glands (64%), followed by H/N exc MSG regions (27%), broncho-pulmonary regions, and "others", thus non-salivary gland origins accounted for 9% of all cases. Patients with SDC, MEC, AcCC, or SGTC of the major salivary glands and broncho-pulmonary regions were more frequently treated by surgery. The overall survival time of the patients with MEC was significantly better than that of patients with SDC or EMC.

CONCLUSIONS

This cross-organ study highlights the clinical significance of SGTCs, underscoring the need for developing novel therapies for this rare disease entity.

Insights Into Pediatric Secretory Carcinoma of the Salivary Gland: A Case Report

Secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland (SCSG) is a rare head and neck tumor in adults and exceptional at the pediatric age. Its varied histological subtypes and distinct clinical presentation pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Therefore, standardized guidelines are of utmost importance for the care of these patients, especially in children. Here we present an 11-year-old male presented with a left cheek mass initially diagnosed as lipoma. A wide resection was performed and SCSG was revealed in the histopathologic and immunohistochemistry analysis. The presentation of this case provides valuable information on the diagnostic and therapeutic complexities of SCSG. It emphasizes the need for standardized guidelines and further research to optimize pediatric patient outcomes. Overall, this case report is a crucial resource for clinicians and researchers, highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and early intervention in managing SCSG.

Translational research in head and neck cancer: Molecular and immunological updates

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has a poor prognosis. Each year, approximately 880,000 patients are newly diagnosed with HNSCC worldwide, and 450,000 patients with HNSCC die. Risk factors for developing HNSCC have been identified, with cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and viral infections being the major factors. Owing to the prevalence of human papillomavirus infection, the number of HNSCC cases is increasing considerably. Surgery and chemoradiotherapy are the primary treatments for HNSCC. With advancements in tumor biology, patients are eligible for novel treatment modalities, namely targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and photoimmunotherapy. Because this area of research has rapidly progressed, clinicians should understand the basic biology of HNSCC to choose an appropriate therapy in the upcoming era of personalized medicine. This review summarized recent developments in tumor biology, focusing on epidemiology, genetic/epigenetic factors, the tumor microenvironment, microbiota, immunity, and photoimmunotherapy in HNSCC, as well as how these findings can be translated into clinical settings.

Salivary gland carcinoma: Towards a more personalised approach

Salivary Gland carcinomas (SGCs) are rare tumors accounting for less than 1% of all cancers with 21 histologically diverse subtypes. The rarity of the disease presents a challenge for clinicians to conduct large size randomized controlled trials. Surgery and radiotherapy remain the only curative treatment for localized disease, whereas treatments for recurrent and metastatic disease remain more challenging with very disappointing results for chemotherapy. The different histological subtypes harbor various genetic alterations, some pathognomonic with a diagnostic impact for pathologists in confirming a difficult diagnosis and others with therapeutic implications regardless of the histologic subtype. Current international guidelines urge pathologists to identify androgen receptor status, HER-2 expression that could be determined by immunohistochemistry, and TRK status in patients with non-adenoid cystic salivary gland carcinoma that are eligible to initiate a systemic treatment, in order to offer them available targeted therapies or refer them to clinical trials based on their mutational profile. A more advanced molecular profiling by next generation sequencing would offer a larger panel of molecular alterations with possible therapeutic implications such as NOTCH, PI3K, BRAF, MYB, and EGFR. In the following review, we present the most common genetic alterations in SGCs as well as actionable mutations with the latest available data on therapeutic options and upcoming clinical trials.

From genomic spectrum of NTRK genes to adverse effects of its inhibitors, a comprehensive genome-based and real-world pharmacovigilance analysis

Introduction: The discovery of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions has facilitated the development of precision oncology. Two first-generation NTRK inhibitors (larotrectinib and entrectinib) are currently approved for the treatment of patients with solid tumors harboring NTRK gene fusions. Nevertheless, comprehensive NTRK profiling at the pan-cancer genomic level and real-world studies pertaining to the adverse events of NTRK inhibitors are lacking. Methods: We characterize the genome of NTRK at the pan-cancer level through multi-omics databases such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Through the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, we collect reports of entrectinib and larotrectinib-induced adverse events and perform a pharmacovigilance analysis using various disproportionality methods. Results: NTRK1/2/3 expression is lower in most tumor tissues, while they have higher methylation levels. NTRK gene expression has prognostic value in some cancer types, such as breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA). The cancer type with highest NTRK alteration frequency is skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) (31.98%). Thyroid carcinoma (THCA) has the largest number of NTRK fusion cases, and the most common fusion pair is ETV6-NTRK3. Adverse drug events (ADEs) obtained from the FAERS database for larotrectinib and entrectinib are 524 and 563, respectively. At the System Organ Class (SOC) level, both drugs have positive signal value for "nervous system disorder". Other positive signals for entrectinib include "cardiac disorders", "metabolism and nutrition disorders", while for larotrectinib, it is "hepatobiliary disorders". The unexpected signals are also listed in detail. ADEs of the two NTRK inhibitors mainly occur in the first month. The median onset time of ADEs for entrectinib and larotrectinib was 16 days (interquartile range [IQR] 6-86.5) and 44 days ([IQR] 7-136), respectively. Conclusion: Our analysis provides a broad molecular view of the NTRK family. The real-world adverse drug event analysis of entrectinib and larotrectinib contributes to more refined medication management.

Detection of salivary gland and sinonasal fusions by a next-generation sequencing based, ligation-dependent, multiplex RT-PCR assay

AIMS

The discovery of tumour type-specific gene fusion oncogenes in benign and malignant salivary gland and sinonasal (SGSN) tumours has significantly increased our knowledge about their molecular pathology and classification.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We developed a new targeted multiplexed next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based method that utilizes ligation dependent reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (LD-RT-PCR) to detect oncogenic fusion transcripts involving 116 genes, leading to 96 gene fusions known to be recurrently rearranged in these tumours. In all, 180 SGSN tumours (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples, 141 specimens and 39 core needle biopsies) from the REFCORpath (French network for rare head and neck cancers) with previously identified fusion genes by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH), RT-PCR, or molecular immunohistochemistry were selected to test its specificity and sensitivity and validate its diagnostic use. Tested tumours encompassed 14 major tumours types, including secretory carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, salivary gland intraductal carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, pleomorphic adenoma, adamantinoma-like Ewing Sarcoma, EWSR1::COLCA2 sinonasal sarcoma, DEK::AFF2 sinonasal carcinoma, and biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma. In-frame fusion transcripts were detected in 97.8% of cases (176/180). Gene fusion assay results correlated with conventional techniques (immunohistochemistry [IHC], FISH, and RT-PCR) in 176/180 tumours (97.8%).

CONCLUSION

This targeted multiplexed NGS-based LD-RT-PCR method is a robust, highly sensitive method for the detection of recurrent gene fusions from routine clinical SGSN tumours. It can be easily customized to cover new fusions. These results are promising for implementing an integrated NGS system to rapidly detect genetic aberrations, facilitating accurate, genomics-based diagnoses, and accelerate time to precision therapies in SGSN tumours.

Current management and future challenges in salivary glands cancer

Salivary gland cancers (SGCs) are rare, accounting for less than 5% of all malignancies of the head and neck region, and are morphologically heterogeneous. The diagnosis is mainly based on histology, with the complementary aid of molecular profiling, which is helpful in recognizing some poorly differentiated, borderline, or atypical lesions. Instrumental imaging defines the diagnosis, representing a remarkable tool in the treatment plan. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance are the most common procedures used to describe the primary tumour. The treatment of SGCs is multimodal and consists of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy; each treatment plan is, however, featured on the patient and disease's characteristics. On 24 June 2022, in the meeting "Current management and future challenges in salivary gland cancers" many experts in this field discussed the state of the art of SGCs research, the future challenges and developments. After the meeting, the same pool of experts maintained close contact to keep these data further updated in the conference proceedings presented here. This review collects the insights and suggestions that emerged from the discussion during and after the meeting per se.

Prevalence of NTRK Fusions in Canadian Solid Tumour Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions occur in ~ 0.3% of all solid tumours but are enriched in some rare tumour types. Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib are approved as tumour-agnostic therapies for solid tumours harbouring NTRK fusions.

METHODS

This study investigated the prevalence of NTRK fusions in Canadian patients and also aimed to help guide NTRK testing paradigms through analysis of data reported from a national clinical diagnostic testing program between September 2019 and July 2021.

RESULTS

Of 1,687 patients included in the final analysis, NTRK fusions were detected in 0.71% (n = 12) of patients representing salivary gland carcinoma (n = 3), soft tissue sarcoma (n = 3), CNS (n = 3), and one in each of melanoma, lung, and colorectal cancer. All three salivary gland carcinomas contained ETV6-NTRK3 fusions. Thirteen (0.77%) clinically actionable incidental findings were also detected. Two of the 13 samples containing incidental findings were NTRK fusion-positive (GFOD1-NTRK2, FGFR3-TACC3 in a glioblastoma and AFAP1-NTRK2, BRAF c.1799T>A in a glioma). The testing algorithm screened most patient samples via pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC), whereas samples from the central nervous system (CNS), pathognomonic cancers, and confirmed/ putative NTRK fusion-positive samples identified under research protocols were reflexed straight to next-generation sequencing (NGS).

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the benefit and practicality of a diagnostic testing program to identify patients suitable for tumour-agnostic TRK inhibitor therapies, as well as other targeted therapies, due to clinically actionable incidental findings identified. Collectively, these findings may inform future guidance on selecting the appropriate testing approach per tumour type and on optimal NTRK testing algorithms.

Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Salivary Gland: Demographics and Comparative Analysis in U.S. Children and Adults with Future Perspective of Management

Background: Salivary gland neoplasms are uncommon in both pediatric and adult populations. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is one of the most common salivary gland tumors and usually presents with atypical clinical features. This study sought to evaluate the demographic and clinical factors affecting outcomes in adults and pediatric populations with MEC that could be used to risk stratification for treatment selection and clinical trial enrollment. Methods: Data on 4507 MEC patients were extracted from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database (2000−2018). Patients aged ≤ 18 years were classified into the pediatric population, and those older than 18 years were placed in the adult group. Kaplan−Meier survival curves were created to analyze survival probabilities for various independent factors. Results: The pediatric population comprised 3.7% of the entire cohort, with a predominance of females (51.5%), while the adult population constituted 96.3% of the cohort, with a predominance of female patients (52.2%). Caucasians were the predominant race overall (75.3%), while more African Americans were seen in the pediatric group. In tumor size of <2 cm overall, poorly differentiated tumors with higher metastasis rates were observed more in adults (11.3% and 9.3%) than in the pediatric population (3.0% and 4.8%, p < 0.05). Surgical resection was the most common treatment option (53.9%), making up 63.6% of the pediatric and 53.5% of the adult groups. A combination of surgical resection and radiation was used in 29.8% of the entire cohort while a combination of surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy made up only 3.2%. The pediatric group had a lower overall mortality rate (5.5%) than the adult group (28.6%). Females had a higher 5-year survival rate in comparison to males (86.5%, and 73.7%, respectively). Surgical resection led to a more prolonged overall survival and 5-year cancer-specific survival (98.4% (C.I, 93.7−99.6) in the pediatric group and 88.8% (C.I, 87.5−90.0) in the adult group), respectively. Metastasis to the lung, bone, brain, and/or liver was found to have significantly lower survival rates. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that adults (hazard ratio [HR] = 7.4), Asian or Pacific Islander (HR = 0.5), male (HR = 0.8), poorly differentiated histology (HR = 3.8), undifferentiated histology (HR = 4.5), regional spread (HR = 2.1), and distant spread (HR = 3.2) were associated with increased mortality (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands primarily affects Whites and is more aggressive in adults than in the pediatric population. Even with surgical resection, the overall survival is poor in the adult population as compared to its pediatric counterparts. Advanced age, larger tumor size, male sex, and lymph node invasion are associated with increased mortality.