Diagnosis and therapy monitoring of Whipple's arthritis by polymerase chain reaction

Will rheumatologists ever pick up the arthroscope again?

Conditions prompting physicians and surgeons first adapting endoscopes to peer into joints were mainly the sort of synovial conditions that would concern today's rheumatologists. Rheumatologists were among the pre-World War II pioneers developing and documenting arthroscopy. The post-War father of modern arthroscopy, Watanabe, found rheumatologists among his early students, who took back the technique to their home countries, teaching orthopedists and rheumatologists alike. Rheumatologists described and analyzed the intra-articular features of their common diseases in the '60s and '70s. A groundswell of interest from academic rheumatologists in adapting arthroscopy grew considerably in the '90s with development of "needle scopes" that could be used in an office setting. Rheumatologists helped conduct the very trials the findings of which reduced demand for their arthroscopic services by questioning the efficacy of arthroscopic debridement in osteoarthritis (OA) and also developing biological compounds that greatly reduced the call for any resective intervention in inflammatory arthropathies. The arthroscope has proven an excellent tool for viewing and sampling synovium and continues to serve this purpose at several international research centers. While cartilage is now imaged mainly by magnetic resonance imaging, some OA features - such as a high prevalence of visible calcinosis - beg further arthroscopy-directed investigation. A new generation of "needle scopes" with far superior optics awaits future investigators, should they develop interest.

Clinical pitfalls of leishmaniasis and Whipple's disease hidden behind systemic lupus erythematosus: A case series

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystemic autoimmune disease that can affect major organs possibly leading to life-threatening complications and appears with heterogeneous clinical picture. SLE could present with broad spectrum of clinical and laboratory features that can resemble those of other diseases, such as hemopoietic malignancies, infections, or immune-mediated disorders. Its complexity and protean features overlap with many other diseases, hindering the differential diagnosis. Rarely, true overlap with other diseases may occur. Herein, we report a case series of two patients affected by infectious diseases, namely visceral leishmaniasis and Whipple's disease (WD), intertwined with clinical or serological features of SLE. In both cases, several confounding factors have led to a delay in the diagnosis. Moreover, we first describe the persistent elevation of autoantibodies and a monoclonal gammopathy in a patient with WD. Awareness of unusual presentations of infections or other rare disorders, which may be encountered in clinical practice when taking care of SLE patients, is essential for timely diagnosis and treatment of potentially lethal diseases.

Tropheryma whipplei Infection (Whipple Disease) in the USA

BACKGROUND

Whipple disease (WD) is an infection caused by the bacterium Tropheryma whipplei (TW). Few cases have been reported in the USA.

AIMS

To report on the demographics, clinical manifestations, diagnostic findings, treatment, and outcomes of TW infection.

METHODS

Cases of TW infection diagnosed from 1995 to 2010 were identified in three US referral centers and from 1995 to 2015 in one. Definite classic WD was defined by positive periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining and probable WD by specific positive TW polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of intestinal specimens. Localized infections were defined by a positive TW PCR result from samples of other tissues/body fluids.

RESULTS

Among the 33 cases of TW infections, 27 (82%) were male. Median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range 11-75). Diagnosis was supported by a positive TW PCR in 29 (88%) and/or a positive PAS in 16 (48%) patients. Classic WD was the most frequent presentation (n = 18, 55%), with 14 definite and 4 probable cases. Localized infections (n = 15, 45%) affected the central nervous system (n = 7), joints (n = 4), heart (n = 2), eye (n = 1), and skeletal muscle (n = 1). Blood PCR was negative in 9 of 17 (53%) cases at diagnosis. Ceftriaxone intravenously followed by trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole orally was the most common regimen (n = 23, 70%). Antibiotic therapy resulted in clinical response in 24 (73%).

CONCLUSIONS

TW infection can present as intestinal or localized disease. Negative small bowel PAS and PCR do not exclude the diagnosis of TW infection, and blood PCR is insensitive for active infection.

[PCR-based detection of pathogens in clinical rheumatology]

In the differential diagnostics of autoimmune-mediated rheumatic diseases, rheumatologists often have to consider infections (e. g. Lyme arthritis) or reactive diseases (e. g. reactive arthritis after urogenital bacterial infections). Furthermore, infections with an atypical presentation or caused by atypical pathogens (opportunistic infections) can complicate the immunosuppressive therapy of autoimmune diseases. For this purpose not only conventional microbiological culture methods but also PCR-based methods are increasingly being applied for the direct detection of pathogens in clinical specimens. The aim of this overview is to present commonly used PCR methods in the clinical practice of rheumatology and to describe their benefits and limitations compared to culture-based detection methods.

Tropheryma whipplei infection (Whipple's disease) in a patient after liver transplantation

Whipple's disease (WD) is a rare infection caused by the bacterium Tropheryma whipplei that can affect multiple organs and most commonly occurs in the immunocompetent host. Only 3 cases of WD have been reported in the setting of immunosuppression for organ transplantation. Here, we report the first case of WD, to our knowledge, in a patient after liver transplantation with comorbid graft-versus-host-disease. We discuss the diagnostic challenges in this setting and the value of electron microscopy and in situ hybridization methods for confirming the infection. WD may be under-diagnosed in immunosuppressed transplant patients because the disease can present with atypical clinical and histological features that suggest other conditions.

Rheumatic and musculoskeletal features of Whipple disease: a report of 29 cases

OBJECTIVE

Whipple disease is a rare infection caused by Tropheryma whipplei. Although patients commonly complain of osteoarticular involvement, musculoskeletal manifestations have been poorly described. We report cases of Whipple disease with rheumatic symptoms and describe their clinical presentation, modes of diagnosis, and outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included patients with Whipple disease diagnosed and referenced between 1977 and 2011 in 10 rheumatology centers in France and Italy.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were included. The median age was 55 years. The median time to diagnosis from first symptoms was 5 years. Polyarthritis was the most frequent presentation (20/29), and was most often chronic, intermittent (19/29), seronegative (22/23), and nonerosive (22/29). In all cases, the symptoms had led to incorrect diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic disease and immunosuppressants, including biotherapy, were prescribed in most cases (24/29) without success. The diagnosis of Whipple disease was made by histological analysis, molecular biology tests, or both in 21%, 36%, and 43% of the cases, respectively. Duodenal biopsies were performed in most cases (86%). Synovial biopsies were performed in 18% of cases, but all contributed to diagnosis. The clinical outcomes after antibiotic therapy were good for all patients.

CONCLUSION

Polyarthritis is the main feature observed in cases of Whipple disease; it is seronegative and associated with general and gastrointestinal symptoms. The molecular analysis of duodenal tissue and/or other tissues remains the method of choice to confirm the diagnosis. Reducing the time to diagnosis is important because severe late systemic and fatal forms of the disease may occur.

Systemic Tropheryma whipplei: clinical presentation of 142 patients with infections diagnosed or confirmed in a reference center

Culture of Tropheryma whipplei, the agent of Whipple disease (WD), was achieved in our laboratory in 2000, allowing new perspectives for the diagnosis of this disease and for the description of other potential clinical manifestations caused by this microorganism. Since 2000, we have developed new tools in our center in Marseille, France, to optimize the diagnosis of T whipplei infections. Classic WD was characterized by positive periodic acid-Schiff performed on duodenal biopsy. In the absence of duodenal histologic involvement, localized infections were defined by specific positive T whipplei polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results obtained using samples of other tissues and body fluids. The physicians in charge of patients were asked to complete a questionnaire. A total of 215 diagnoses were performed or confirmed and, among these, 142 patients with sufficient clinical data were included.Herein, we report epidemiologic data, clinical manifestations, and diagnostic tools of T whipplei infections. In the 113 patients with classic WD, the main symptom was arthralgia (88/113, 78%), which explains the many cases misdiagnosed as inflammatory rheumatoid disease (56/113, 50%). Frequently immunosuppressive treatments, more recently including tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, had been previously prescribed (50%) and were often responsible for more rapid clinical progression (43%). Sometimes a short course of antibiotics improved the clinical status.Endocarditis was the second most frequent manifestation of T whipplei, with 16 cases. The clinical picture of this entity corresponds to cardiovascular involvement with acute heart failure (50%) occurring without fever (75%) or previous valvular disease (69%). Neurologic symptoms were the third major manifestation. Other localized infections such as adenopathy, uveitis, pulmonary involvement, or joint involvement were sporadic. Infection with T whipplei resulted in multifaceted conditions. Some localized infections due to this agent have recently been reported and may correspond to emerging entities. Patients with inflammatory rheumatoid disease must be systematically interviewed to determine the efficacy of previous immunosuppressive and antibiotic therapies.

An unusual cause of diarrhoea and arthritis

A 41-year-old lady was investigated by several hospital teams over a 5-year period. She initially presented with arthralgia but over time developed a myriad of signs and symptoms. Later, she was admitted for investigation of profound weight loss, anaemia and a rising C-reactive protein. Extensive gastrointestinal investigations were performed. Duodenal biopsy revealed microscopic evidence of villous blunting with prominent collections of macrophages within the lamina propria and submucosa. These changes were consistent with Whipple's disease and confirmed by polymerase chain reaction on the biopsy sample. Initiation of antibiotic therapy led to normalisation of inflammatory markers and marked clinical improvement. Even in younger female patients, this disease should always be considered.

Whipple's disease: new aspects of pathogenesis and treatment

100 years after its first description by George H Whipple, the diagnosis and treatment of Whipple's disease is still a subject of controversy. Whipple's disease is a chronic multisystemic disease. The infection is very rare, although the causative bacterium, Tropheryma whipplei, is ubiquitously present in the environment. We review the epidemiology of Whipple's disease and the recent progress made in the understanding of its pathogenesis and the biology of its agent. The clinical features of Whipple's disease are non-specific and sensitive diagnostic methods such as PCR with sequencing of the amplification products and immunohistochemistry to detect T whipplei are still not widely distributed. The best course of treatment is not completely defined, especially in relapsing disease, neurological manifestations, and in cases of immunoreconstitution after initiation of antibiotic treatment. Patients without the classic symptoms of gastrointestinal disease might be misdiagnosed or insufficiently treated, resulting in a potentially fatal outcome or irreversible neurological damage. Thus, we suggest procedures for the improvement of diagnosis and an optimum therapeutic strategy.

Whipple’s disease

Whipple's disease (WD) is a chronic debilitating disease caused by the bacillus Tropheryma whippleii. WD classically presents with the main clinical symptoms of polyarthralgias, chronic diarrhea, weight loss, and abdominal pain. Given its systemic involvement, it is common for WD to present with a multitude of other clinical scenarios--sometimes with predominant neurologic, cardiac, and dermatologic manifestations. WD can occur at any age, but it generally occurs during the fifth decade and predominantly in men. The diagnosis of WD is established by demonstrating the organism on biopsies from the involved system, by histology, electron microscopy, polymerase chain reaction, and more recently, by culture of bacteria. The histologic features include a coarse granular cytoplasm and foamy macrophages that stain strongly with the period-acid Schiff reagent. Current therapy includes an initial 2-week course of intravenous cephalosporins followed by 1-year oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Enteropathic arthritis

Enteropathic arthritis is a form of arthritis associated with the chronic inflammatory bowel diseases, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease. This form of arthritis is classified as one of the group of seronegative spondyloarthropathies, which also includes psoriatic arthritis, reactive arthritis, and idiopathic ankylosing spondylitis. Joint involvement also occurs with other gastrointestinal diseases such as Whipple's disease, celiac disease, and following intestinal bypass surgery for morbid obesity. In these conditions, abnormal bowel permeability and immunologic and genetic influences are probably involved in the pathogenesis of the joint disease, although the exact mechanisms remain uncertain.

Whipple's disease

Whipple's disease, or intestinal lipodystrophy, is a systemic infectious disorder affecting mostly middle-aged white men. Patients present with weight loss, arthralgia, diarrhoea, and abdominal pain. The disease is commonly diagnosed by small-bowel biopsy; the appearance of the sample is characterised by inclusions in the lamina propria staining with periodic-acid-Schiff, which represent the causative bacteria. Tropheryma whipplei has been classified as an actinomycete and has been propagated in vitro, which allows the possibility of improving diagnostic strategies, for example through antibody-based detection of the bacillus on duodenal tissue or in circulating monocytes. Cell-mediated immunity in active and inactive Whipple's disease has subtle defects that might predispose some individuals to symptomatic infection with this bacillus, which probably occurs ubiquitously. Although most patients respond well to empirical antibiotic treatment, some with relapsing disease have a poor outlook. The recent findings and concerted research might allow development of new strategies for diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of patients with Whipple's disease.

Detection of Tropheryma whipplei DNA in feces by PCR using a target capture method

Whipple's disease is a rare multisystemic bacterial infection with variable clinical manifestations. For decades, the laboratory diagnosis was based on the demonstration of periodic acid Schiff-positive inclusions in macrophages of gastrointestinal biopsies. PCR has improved the diagnosis of Whipple's disease due to its increased sensitivity compared to histopathological analysis. To avoid invasive procedures for taking specimens, we have investigated the possibility of detecting Tropheryma whipplei DNA in feces rather than in biopsies or gastric aspirate of patients with and without Whipple's disease. Total bacterial DNA was isolated from stool specimens using Qiagen columns followed by a T. whipplei-specific hybridization step with a biotinylated capture probe and streptavidin-coated magnetic particles. The captured DNA was then amplified using the same seminested PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene of the organism that had been applied to other specimens without capturing. For five of eight patients with Whipple's disease, duodenal biopsies and stool samples were PCR positive, whereas for the three other patients, both specimens were PCR negative. Of 84 patients without Whipple's disease, 75 tested negative in the duodenal biopsy and in the stool sample. For four, both specimens were positive. Five patients tested positive in the stool sample but not in the biopsy. However, for three of these five patients, the gastric aspirate had been PCR positive, indicating that the stool PCR result was true rather than false positive. Compared to PCR from duodenal biopsies, stool PCR has a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97.3%. Additionally, 15 PCR-positive and 22 PCR-negative stool samples were extracted using the Invisorb Spin Stool DNA kit. The simplified stool extraction showed 93.3% sensitivity and 95.5% specificity compared to the target capture method. We conclude that PCR with stool specimens with either extraction method is a sensitive and specific diagnostic tool for the detection of T. whipplei DNA and one not requiring invasive sampling procedures.