Tuberculosis in a nine-year-old girl treated with infliximab for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Infectious Complications With the Use of Biologic Response Modifiers in Infants and Children

Biologic response modifiers (BRMs) are substances that interact with and modify the host immune system. BRMs that dampen the immune system are used to treat conditions such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or inflammatory bowel disease and often in combination with other immunosuppressive agents, such as methotrexate and corticosteroids. Cytokines that are targeted include tumor necrosis factor α; interleukins (ILs) 6, 12, and 23; and the receptors for IL-1α (IL-1A) and IL-1β (IL-1B) as well as other molecules. Although the risk varies with the class of BRM, patients receiving immune-dampening BRMs generally are at increased risk of infection or reactivation with mycobacterial infections (Mycobacterium tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria), some viral (herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis B) and fungal (histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis) infections, as well as other opportunistic infections. The use of BRMs warrants careful determination of infectious risk on the basis of history (including exposure, residence, and travel and immunization history) and selected baseline screening test results. Routine immunizations should be given at least 2 weeks (inactivated or subunit vaccines) or 4 weeks (live vaccines) before initiation of BRMs whenever feasible, and inactivated influenza vaccine should be given annually. Inactivated and subunit vaccines should be given when needed while taking BRMs, but live vaccines should be avoided unless under special circumstances in consultation with an infectious diseases specialist. If the patient develops a febrile or serious respiratory illness during BRM therapy, consideration should be given to stopping the BRM while actively searching for and treating possible infectious causes.

Tuberculosis in pediatric patients treated with anti-TNFα drugs: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Adult patients receiving anti-TNFα drugs are at increased risk of tuberculosis (TB), but studies in pediatric populations are limited, and the best strategy for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening in this population remains controversial. We describe the prevalence of LTBI prior to anti-TNFα therapy and the long-term follow-up after biological treatment initiation in a cohort of children and adolescents.

METHODS

Cohort observational study in children and adolescents receiving anti-TNFα agents in a tertiary-care pediatric hospital. LTBI was ruled out prior to the implementation of anti-TNFα drugs by tuberculin skin test (TST), and, from March 2012 on, QuantiFERON Gold-In Tube test (QTF-G). During anti-TNFα treatment, patients were evaluated every 6 months for TB with history and physical examination. TST/QTF-G were not repeated unless signs or symptoms consistent with TB arose or there was proven TB contact.

RESULTS

The final cohort consisted of 221 patients (56.1% female; 261 treatments), of whom 51.7%/30.0%/17.3% were treated with etanercept/adalimumab/infliximab, respectively, for a variety of rheumatic diseases (75.6%), inflammatory bowel disease (20.8%), and inflammatory eye diseases (3.6%). The median (IQR) age at diagnosis of the primary condition was 6.8 years (2.7-11.0) and the duration of the disease before implementing the anti-TNFα agent was 1.8 years (0.6-4.2). LTBI was diagnosed in 3 adolescent girls (prevalence rate: 1.4%; 95% CI: 0.4-4.2) affected with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: TST tested positive in only 1, while QTF-G was positive in all cases (including 2 patients already on etanercept). They all received antiTB chemoprophylaxis and were later (re)treated with etanercept for 24-29 months, without incidences. No incident cases of TB disease were observed during the follow-up period under anti-TNFα treatment of 641 patients-year, with a median (IQR) time per patient of 2.3 years (1.4-4.3).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the prevalence of LTBI (1.4%) was similar to that reported in population screening studies in Spain; no incident cases of TB disease were observed. In low-burden TB settings, initial screening for TB in children prior to anti-TNFα treatment should include both TST and an IGRA test, but systematic repetition of LTBI immunodiagnostic tests seems unnecessary in the absence of symptoms or known TB contact.

What are the immunological consequences of long-term use of biological therapies for juvenile idiopathic arthritis?

This review summarizes the immunological consequences of biological therapies used in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). For every frequently used biological agent the characteristics are clearly specified (molecular target, isotype, registered indication for JIA, route of administration, half-life, contraindication, very common side effects, expected time of response and average cost in the first year). The emphasis of this review is on the immunological side effects that have been encountered for every separate agent in JIA populations. For each agent these adverse events have been calculated as incidence per 100 patient-years for the following categories: serious infections, tuberculosis, malignancies, response to vaccination, new-onset autoimmune diseases and development of anti-drug antibodies. There are large differences in side effects between various agents and there is a clear need for an international and standardized collection of post-marketing surveillance data of biologicals in the vulnerable group of JIA patients. Such an international pharmacovigilance database, called Pharmachild, has now been started.

A prospective study comparing infection risk and disease activity in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis treated with and without tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors are effective treatment for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) but may increase infection rates. However, active JIA may also render patients vulnerable to infection. In this study, we prospectively assessed infection rates in JIA patients treated with and without TNF-α inhibitors and correlated disease activity with infection risk. TNF-α inhibitor-naïve JIA subjects were followed up for 12 months. Subjects initiated on TNF-α inhibitors after enrollment were analyzed in the TNF group. Subjects treated without TNF-α inhibitors were analyzed in the non-TNF group. Questionnaires captured mild or severe infections. JIA disease activity by Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) disability index/pain score and physician joint count/global assessment was recorded. Twenty TNF and 36 non-TNF subjects were analyzed. The total infection rate ratio for TNF versus non-TNF group subjects was 1.14 (95% CI, 0.78-1.66; p = 0.51). The average rate of infections per month was 0.29 for TNF and 0.24 for non-TNF subjects. No severe infections or hospitalizations occurred in either group. Secondary infectious outcomes were also similar between groups. Controlling for study group, an increase in CHAQ pain score correlated with an increase in several infectious outcome measures. Our results suggest no difference in infection rates between JIA subjects treated with and without TNF-α inhibitors. Additionally, JIA disease activity may have contributed to infection risk in our cohort, irrespective of immunosuppressive therapy. Future analysis of the relationship between treatment regimens, disease activity, and infection rates may help to further delineate predictors of infection risk in JIA patients.

High Doses of Infliximab in the Management of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Objective.

To review our experiences with high-dose infliximab (IFX) to treat juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). We routinely use high doses of IFX (10–20 mg/kg) in children with recalcitrant or highly active JIA. Although biologics have revolutionized treatment of JIA, many patients have active disease despite therapy. Studies have shown benefits of high-dose IFX in several conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, and idiopathic uveitis. The safety and effectiveness of high-dose IFX have not been evaluated in JIA.

Methods.

We performed a retrospective review of children with JIA who received IFX ≥ 10 mg/kg. We recorded all serious adverse events (SAE), medically important infections, and infusion reactions. We also recorded the physician global assessment of disease activity (MD global) and active joint count (AJC) at initiation of high-dose IFX and 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter.

Results.

Fifty-eight subjects received a total of 1064 infusions over 95 person-years. There were a total of 9 SAE (9.5/100 person-yrs), 7 of which were potentially related to therapy, and 6 infusion reactions (0.5%), none constituting anaphylaxis. Statistically significant improvements were observed in the AJC (median 0, range 0–31, vs 2, 0–39) and MD global (12, 2–31, vs 22, 5–80) over the first year.

Conclusion.

High-dose IFX appears safe in the management of JIA. Future prospective controlled studies are necessary to evaluate its safety and efficacy.

Infections in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors: systematic review of the literature

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors are increasingly administered to children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (pIBD). Adult studies indicate that TNF-α inhibitors lead to an increased risk of serious infections compared to other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. We report herein a systematic literature review detailing the epidemiology and types of infections reported in children with JIA and pIBD treated with TNF-α inhibitors. The most frequently reported infections were mild and characterized as viral in etiology. Severe bacterial and fungal infections also occurred, but were less common and possibly associated with intrinsic risk factors and concurrent immunosuppressive therapy. Few pediatric patients developed Mycobacterium tuberculosis, likely due to effective screening. There were 8 infectious fatalities in children treated with TNF-α inhibitors. Overall, although rare, serious infections occur in immunocompromised children and adolescents with JIA and pIBD receiving TNF-α inhibitors.

Ocular complications associated with systemic medications used in allergy/immunology practice

The repertoire of treatment options available to allergists and immunologists is ever increasing and with this comes the increased potential for these treatments to cause adverse ocular side effects. Corticosteroids remain the first line of treatment for most immunological disorders and physicians should be alerted to their extensive ocular morbidity profile. Patients requiring longer-term therapy may often receive immune modulators or newer biologic agents. While effective, these medications may have additional ocular side effects; as newer agents are more frequently used, some of these may not be previously documented. A number of patients will seek alternative or herbal remedies for these long-term conditions, often unknown to the treating physician; these too can cause harmful ocular morbidity. We review the latest information about the potential ocular side effects that may be encountered in treating patients with medications used in allergic and immunological disorders.

Risk of infection and prevention in pediatric patients with IBD: ESPGHAN IBD Porto Group commentary

Combined immunosuppression by immunomodulators and biological therapy has become standard in the medical management of moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) because of clearly demonstrated efficacy. Clinical studies, registries, and case reports warn of the increased risk of infections, particularly opportunistic infections; however, already in the steroid monotherapy era, patients are at risk because it is accepted that a patient should be considered immunosuppressed when receiving a daily dose of 20 mg of prednisone for 2 weeks. Prescriptions increasingly involve azathioprine, methotrexate, and various biological agents. The TREAT registry evaluated safety in >6000 adult patients, half of them treated with infliximab (IFX) for about 1.9 years. IFX-treated patients had an increased risk of infections and this was associated with disease severity and concomitant prednisone use. The REACH study, evaluating the efficacy of IFX in children with moderate-to-severe Crohn disease, refractory to immunomodulatory treatment, reports serious infections as the major adverse events and their frequency is higher with shorter treatment intervals. The combination of immunosuppressive medications is a risk factor for opportunistic infections. Exhaustive guidelines on prophylaxis, diagnosis, and management of opportunistic infections in adult patients with IBD have been published by a European Crohn's and Colitis Organization working group, including clear evidence-based statements. We have reviewed the literature on infections in pediatric IBD as well as the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization guidelines to present a commentary on infection prophylaxis for the pediatric age group.

Fatal group A Streptococcus purpura fulminans in a child receiving TNF-α blocker

Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is effective in the treatment of many pediatric autoimmune diseases and inflammatory conditions. Commonly available biologic agents blocking TNF-α are infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab. These agents have changed the management of rheumatic diseases in the adult population and are being used more and more in pediatric patients as safety and efficacy have been demonstrated. Infections have been the most commonly reported adverse effects of TNF-α inhibition. Granulomatous infections such as tuberculosis are well-known complications, but serious bacterial infections are also reported. We describe a fatal case of purpura fulminans caused by group A Streptococcus in an 8-year-old child with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis treated with etanercept. This case highlights the clinical association of severe bacterial infection and TNF-α inhibition in children. Pediatricians should educate their patients who are treated with TNF-α blockers regarding early warning symptoms and should also have a lower threshold for initiating antibiotic therapy in case of fever.

Duration of etanercept treatment and reasons for discontinuation in a cohort of juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients

OBJECTIVE

Since 2004, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients treated with etanercept and/or MTX have been monitored in the British Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology Biologics and New Drug Register. Here, we report the duration of etanercept use for the first 5 years of the register and reasons for discontinuation.

METHODS

Disease subtype and activity, comorbidity, treatment efficacy and safety data were recorded. Etanercept discontinuation was defined as stopping the drug because of disease remission or treatment failure. Time to discontinuation was explored using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with remaining patients censored at 5-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 483 etanercept-treated JIA patients were enrolled from 30 UK centres, representing 941 patient-years of follow-up. A total of 100 (20.7%) patients discontinued etanercept; 9 due to disease control, 88 because of treatment failure, 2 for unknown reasons and 1 because of a change in diagnosis. Of the 53 patients in whom etanercept was perceived to be ineffective at controlling the inflammation, 48 were prescribed other biologic drugs [26/48 (54%) infliximab]. In 21 patients with intolerance, infections, CNS events and a few isolated events were associated with discontinuation. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, at 5 years 69% (95% CI 61, 77%) had not experienced treatment failure. Discontinuation of etanercept for inefficacy was associated with systemic arthritis subtype [odds ratio (OR) 2.55, 95% CI 1.27, 5.14], chronic anterior uveitis (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.06, 5.35) and inefficacy of MTX before starting etanercept (OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.14, 60.58).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of JIA patients treated with etanercept and followed for a median of 2 years (maximum 5 years), the majority (69%) remain on the drug.

The effect of TNFα blockade in complicated, refractory Kawasaki disease

In Kawasaki disease (KD), a systemic vasculitis of childhood, serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) are elevated during the acute phase of the disease. Although the majority of children recover completely from a single dose of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), the treatment is not always effective. In refractory cases of KD there are no documented treatment guidelines. A future role of biological agents directed against proinflammatory cytokines has recently been suggested by the American Heart Association (AHA). We describe two infants with severe KD, complicated by coronary as well as extracoronary aneurysms, who responded neither to repeated treatment with IVIG plus aspirin nor to corticosteroids. The children were subsequently treated with infliximab. In both cases, the effect was prompt and long-lasting. Clinical improvement was seen within a few days after the first dose, and regression of the aneurysms occurred within weeks.

Biological therapies for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Lessons from the adult and pediatric experiences

Biologics have advanced the therapy of adult and pediatric arthritis. They have been linked to rare serious adverse outcomes, but the actual risk of these events is controversial in adults, and largely unknown in pediatrics. Because of the paucity of safety and efficacy data in children, pediatric rheumatologists often rely on the adult literature. Herein, we reviewed the adult and pediatric literature on five classes of medicines: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, anakinra, rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab. For efficacy, we reviewed randomized controlled studies in adults, but did include lesser qualities of evidence for pediatrics. For safety, we utilized prospective and retrospective studies, rarely including reports from other inflammatory conditions. The review included studies on rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis, as well as juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Overall, we found that the TNF inhibitors have generally been found safe and effective in adult and pediatric use, although risks of infections and other adverse events are discussed. Anakinra, rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab have also shown positive results in adult trials, but there is minimal pediatric data published with the exception of small studies involving the subgroup of children with systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis, in whom anakinra and tocilizumab may be effective therapies.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a broad term that describes a clinically heterogeneous group of arthritides of unknown cause, which begin before 16 years of age. This term encompasses several disease categories, each of which has distinct methods of presentation, clinical signs, and symptoms, and, in some cases, genetic background. The cause of disease is still poorly understood but seems to be related to both genetic and environmental factors, which result in the heterogeneity of the illness. Although none of the available drugs has a curative potential, prognosis has greatly improved as a result of substantial progresses in disease management. The most important new development has been the introduction of drugs such as anticytokine agents, which constitute a valuable treatment option for patients who are resistant to conventional antirheumatic agents. Further insights into the disease pathogenesis and treatment will be provided by the continuous advances in understanding of the mechanisms connected to the immune response and inflammatory process, and by the development of new drugs that are able to inhibit selectively single molecules or pathways.

Infliximab Therapy in Children and Adolescents with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

This review summarises the present knowledge of infliximab therapy in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) based on the available published literature. Infliximab, the chimeric monoclonal IgG(1) antibody to tumour necrosis factor-alpha, is indicated for medically refractory luminal and fistulising paediatric Crohn's disease. Recently, ulcerative colitis case series in children and adolescents suggested that infliximab might also be effective for treatment of ulcerative colitis resistant to standard medical therapy. Induction therapy with infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2 and 6 is routinely used. Since the majority of patients will relapse if not re-treated, a long-term approach with systematic re-treatment with 5 mg/kg every 8-12 weeks is recommended. Maintenance therapy every 8 weeks was superior to 12 weeks' administration in maintaining response and remission in the largest-to-date paediatric randomised trial. Concomitant immunosuppressive therapy reduces the risk of infliximab antibody formation and infusion reactions, and prolongs the duration of treatment success. Severe reactions may not be an absolute contraindication to future infliximab therapy. Premedication does not prevent the development of infusion reactions; however, it is indicated for prevention of subsequent infusion reactions. Adverse events and safety findings in children are comparable to those observed in adults. Latent tuberculosis needs to be screened for. Malignancy rates in paediatric patients treated with infliximab do not seem to be increased. However, newly reported cases of hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma in young patients with IBD treated with infliximab and mercaptopurine therapy raise concern, and long-term follow-up studies are necessary to determine the true malignancy risk.

Update on the medical treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Many exciting developments in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have emerged recently, including new tools to assess the results of clinical trials (eg, the definition of remission and a radiologic scoring tool). New controlled studies examined the equivalence of meloxicam to naproxen, the efficacy of leflunomide but the superiority of methotrexate, and the use of infliximab in polyarthritis JIA. Initial studies have shown the potential of anti-interleukin (IL)-1 and anti-IL-6 receptor antibody therapy for systemic JIA. Corticosteroid-sparing medications including the use of "biologic modifiers" for JIA-associated uveitis have been described. Evidence-based guidelines for the main subtypes of JIA have been published. However, good evidence on the treatment of several disease subtypes is still lacking. Studies of new medications and the use of combination therapy, including aggressive induction therapy early in the disease course, are necessary to continue improving the outcome of JIA patients.

Einsatz von Biologika bei der juvenilen idiopathischen Arthritis

The group of biologics for the treatment of rheumatic diseases is continuously growing. They have become an important option not only for treatment of so far untreatable chronic inflammatory or rheumatic disease, but also for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. In addition, the velocity and the degree of improvement is better than with to conventional therapies. Furthermore, toxicity and risks seem to be lower with higher safety and compatibility. Although the data are scarce, they are widely used. Therefore, the German Arbeitsgemeinschaft Kinder- und Jugendrheumatologie is updating the current recommendation for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis using biologics.

Infections associated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is a proinflammatory cytokine involved in a wide range of important physiologic processes. This cytokine has a pathologic role in some diseases, and TNF-alpha antagonists are effective in treating inflammatory conditions. Given the putative role of TNF-alpha in host defense against tuberculosis and other infections, the risk of infection with TNF-alpha antagonists is a concern. Therefore, we searched the literature for reports of tuberculosis and other infections associated with TNF-alpha-antagonist therapy. Although tuberculosis was rarely reported in randomized clinical comparisons of these antagonists, case reports and submissions to the MedWatch program of the United States Food and Drug Administration have been numerous. Most instances were associated with infliximab, but etanercept and adalimumab may also be associated with an increased risk of tuberculosis. Histoplasmosis, listeriosis, aspergillosis, coccidioidomycosis, and candidiasis have been associated with TNF-alpha antagonists, but the causative relationship is not clear. Potential recipients of these drugs should be rigorously screened with skin testing, detailed questioning about recent travel and potential tuberculosis exposure, assessment for symptoms such as cough and weight loss, and chest radiography to minimize their risk of acquiring or reactivating tuberculosis. As with other immunosuppressant drugs, TNF-alpha antagonists should not be given to patients with active infection.

Stellenwert der neuen Biologicals und Zytokinantagonisten in der Therapie der juvenilen idiopathischen Arthritis (JIA)

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is group of diseases of unknown aetiology characterised by the occurrence of chronic arthritis during childhood. Compared to adult onset rheumatoid arthritis, its course is more variable. Increasing knowledge of the inflammatory process as well as in molecular genetics and biotechnology has enable the production of new drugs, the biologicals. These are able to specifically block mechanisms of immune activation and thereby interfere with the inflammatory process. An increasing number of biologicals have been tried in clinical studies in adults suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis or psoriasis arthritis and a couple of them were already licensed for treatment. Treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis by blockade of tumournecrosis-factor (TNF) using the soluble receptor Etanercept or the monoclonal antibodies Infliximab and Adalimumab showed comparable clinical efficacy. Blockade of TNF therefore already reached a certain place in the therapeutic algorythm for treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Currently, only Etanercept is licensed for treatment of active juvenile polyarthritis refractory to methotrexate. Studies using Infliximab and Adalimumab will be completed in the near future. However, antibodies blocking TNF may already be used in patients suffering from active uncontrolled chronic uveitis in whom visual impairment is threatening. TNF blockers may also be indicated in juvenile ankylosing spondylitis. The use of further biologicals, the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist Anakinra, Atlizumab (MRA) blocking the receptor for interleukin-6 or Abatacept, an inhibitory ligand of the co-stimulatory T cell membrane molecule CD28, remain experimental and should be preserved for clinical studies.