OUP accepted manuscript

Mesenchymal stromal cells for steroid-refractory biopsy-proven grade III-IV acute Graft-versus-Host Disease with predominant gastrointestinal involvement

Introduction

Steroid-refractory acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (SR-aGVHD) is a potentially fatal complication occurring in approximately 60-70% of severe grade III-IV GVHD cases, with a higher incidence in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) involvement. GI aGVHD is associated with poor prognosis, with a 2-year overall survival (OS) rate of only 25% in patients with stage 3-4 GI involvement. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) have emerged as a promising therapeutic option due to their favorable efficacy and safety profile. However, data on bone marrow (BM)-derived MSC use in biopsy-proven grade III-IV SR-aGVHD with GI involvement, particularly in stage 3-4 cases, remain limited.

Methods

This prospective, observational, single-arm, single-center study assessed the efficacy and safety of BM-derived MSC for treating adult patients with biopsy-proven grade III-IV SR-aGVHD with predominant GI involvement. Early (1st-2nd) passage BM-derived MSC were administered weekly at a target dose of 1x106 MSC/kg in two regimens: up to three (MSC3) and six doses (MSC6).

Results

Fifty-seven adult patients with biopsy-proven III-IV grade SR-aGVHD (93% with GI involvement) received MSC treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) was 39% and 42% on Days 14 and 28, respectively, with no significant differences between the two MSC groups (Day 28 ORR 38% for MSC3 and 44% for MSC6). In patients with stage 3-4 GI involvement, the ORR was 26% and 36% at the corresponding time points with comparable efficacy between the two MSC groups (Day 28 ORR 31% for MSC3 and 38% for MSC6). Day 14 and Day 28 responders had significantly higher OS compared to non-responders (52% vs. 7%, p=0.000; 54% vs. 5%, p=0.000), with a comparable OS benefit observed in patients with stage 3-4 GI involvement (45% vs. 8%, p=0.005; 42% vs. 6%, p=0.005), respectively. MSC treatment had a favorable safety profile. The one, 5 and 10-year OS rates were 27%, 24%, and 24%, respectively.

Conclusions

The grade III-IV SR-aGVHD patients, including cases with biopsy-proven severe GI involvement, had significantly better clinical outcomes if responses to MSC treatment were observed on Days 14 and 28. Intensified MSC administration schedule has failed to improve the clinical outcomes. MSC studies focusing on aGVHD prevention and (or) first-line treatment in combination with other agents should be considered.

Mesenchymal stem cells in hematology: Therapeutic initiatives and future directions

In recent years, the landscape of hematology has undergone rapid transformation, driven by innovative therapeutic strategies harnessing the properties of novel cellular therapies. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) represent one of these promising therapies, with potential applications across a range of hematologic conditions. These cells are notable for their immunomodulatory properties, key role in supporting the hematopoietic micro-environment and capacity for multi-directional differentiation. This review will focus on the biologic mechanisms underlying MSC therapeutic use, current avenues of clinical investigation, and potential challenges and future directions for MSC derived therapies.

Revolutionizing medicine: recent developments and future prospects in stem-cell therapy

Stem-cell therapy is a revolutionary frontier in modern medicine, offering enormous capacity to transform the treatment landscape of numerous debilitating illnesses and injuries. This review examines the revolutionary frontier of treatments utilizing stem cells, highlighting the distinctive abilities of stem cells to undergo regeneration and specialized cell differentiation into a wide variety of phenotypes. This paper aims to guide researchers, physicians, and stakeholders through the intricate terrain of stem-cell therapy, examining the processes, applications, and challenges inherent in utilizing stem cells across diverse medical disciplines. The historical journey from foundational contributions in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to recent breakthroughs, including ESC isolation and iPSC discovery, has set the stage for monumental leaps in medical science. Stem cells' regenerative potential spans embryonic, adult, induced pluripotent, and perinatal stages, offering unprecedented therapeutic opportunities in cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, cardiovascular ailments, spinal cord injuries, diabetes, and tissue damage. However, difficulties, such as immunological rejection, tumorigenesis, and precise manipulation of stem-cell behavior, necessitate comprehensive exploration and innovative solutions. This manuscript summarizes recent biotechnological advancements, critical trial evaluations, and emerging technologies, providing a nuanced understanding of the triumphs, difficulties, and future trajectories in stem cell-based regenerative medicine. Future directions, including precision medicine integration, immune modulation strategies, advancements in gene-editing technologies, and bioengineering synergy, offer a roadmap in stem cell treatment. The focus on stem-cell therapy's potential highlights its significant influence on contemporary medicine and points to a future in which individualized regenerative therapies will alleviate various medical disorders.

Repeated Infusions of Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells over 8 Weeks for Steroid-Refractory Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: A Prospective, Phase I/II Clinical Study

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a long-term complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation associated with poor quality of life and increased morbidity and mortality. Currently, there are several approved treatments for patients who do not respond to steroids, such as ruxolitinib. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients fail second-line treatment, indicating the need for novel approaches. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been considered a potential treatment approach for steroid-refractory cGVHD. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeated infusions of MSCs, we administered intravenous MSCs every two weeks to ten patients with severe steroid-refractory cGVHD in a prospective phase I clinical trial. Each patient received a total of four doses, with each dose containing 1 × 106 cells/kg body weight from the same donor and same passage. Patients were assessed for their response to treatment using the 2014 National Institutes of Health (NIH) response criteria during each visit. Ten patients with diverse organ involvement were enrolled, collectively undergoing 40 infusions as planned. Remarkably, the MSC infusions were well tolerated without severe adverse events. Eight weeks after the initial MSC infusion, all ten patients showed partial responses characterized by the amelioration of clinical symptoms and enhancement of their quality of life. The overall response rate was 60%, with a complete response rate of 20% and a partial response (PR) rate of 40% at the last follow-up. Overall survival was 80%, with a median follow-up of 381 days. Two patients died due to relapse of their primary disease. Immunological analyses revealed a reduction in inflammatory markers, including Suppression of Tumorigenicity 2 (ST2), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL)10, and Secreted phosphoprotein 1(SPP1), following the MSC treatment. Repeated MSC infusions proved to be both feasible and safe, and they may be an effective salvage therapy in patients with steroid-refractory cGVHD. Further large-scale clinical studies with long-term follow-up are needed in the future to determine the role of MSCs in cGVHD.

Ruxolitinib in patients with graft versus host disease (GvHD): findings from a compassionate use program

The ruxolitinib compassionate use (CU) program offered ruxolitinib to patients ≥2 years of age with confirmed steroid-resistant acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD and cGvHD, respectively). Data from 1180 patients (n = 775, 370 and 35 with cGvHD, aGvHD, and non-specified GvHD, respectively) were analyzed. Most patients had severe cGvHD (56%) or stage III/IV aGvHD (70%) disease and had previously received corticosteroids ( > 80%); ruxolitinib was requested primarily as a second-/third-line option. Patients <12 and ≥12 years old most often received the recommended ruxolitinib doses (5 mg twice daily [BID] and 10 mg BID, respectively); however, 23% and 30% of ≥12 year olds with cGvHD and aGvHD, respectively, received the lower dose of 5 mg BID. Notably, corticosteroid usage decreased with ruxolitinib treatment; at the initial ruxolitinib request, 81% and 91% of patients with cGvHD and aGvHD, respectively, were receiving corticosteroids whereas at resupply, 62% and 64%, respectively, were receiving corticosteroids. Eighty two percent of evaluable patients with cGvHD had a complete or partial response to treatment and 56% of evaluable patients with aGvHD had a best response of grade 0/I. These findings demonstrate the rapid and positive effects of ruxolitinib in patients with GvHD in a real-world setting.

Basiliximab Treatment for Patients With Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Matched Sibling Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Basiliximab is an important treatment for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD). We performed this retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of basiliximab treatment in SR-aGVHD patients following matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT) (n = 63). Overall response rate (ORR) was 63.5% and 54% at any time and at day 28 after basiliximab treatment. Grade III-IV aGVHD before basiliximab treatment predicted a poor ORR after basiliximab treatment. The rates of virus, bacteria, and fungi infections were 54%, 23.8%, and 3.1%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 730 (range, 67-3,042) days, the 1-year probability of overall survival and disease-free survival after basiliximab treatment were 58.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47.6%-72.2%) and 55.4% (95% CI = 44.3%-69.2%), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality after basiliximab treatment were 18.9% (95% CI = 8.3%-29.5%) and 33.8% (95% CI = 21.8%-45.7%), respectively. Comorbidities burden before allo-HSCT, severity of aGVHD and liver aGVHD before basiliximab treatment showed negative influences on survival. Thus, basiliximab was safe and effective treatment for SR-aGVHD following MSD-HSCT.

Mesenchymal stromal cells, metabolism, and mitochondrial transfer in bone marrow normal and malignant hematopoiesis

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation-based treatments are in different phases of clinical development, ranging from current therapies to a promise in the repair and regeneration of diseased tissues and organs. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs), which are fibroblast-like heterogeneous progenitors with multilineage differentiation (osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic) and self-renewal potential, and exist in the bone marrow (BM), adipose, and synovium, among other tissues, represent one of the most widely used sources of stem cells in regenerative medicine. MSCs derived from bone marrow (BM-MSCs) exhibit a variety of traits, including the potential to drive HSC fate and anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive capabilities via paracrine activities and interactions with the innate and adaptive immune systems. The role of BM-MSC-derived adipocytes is more controversial and may act as positive or negative regulators of benign or malignant hematopoiesis based on their anatomical location and functional crosstalk with surrounding cells in the BM microenvironment. This review highlights the most recent clinical and pre-clinical findings on how BM-MSCs interact with the surrounding HSCs, progenitors, and immune cells, and address some recent insights on the mechanisms that mediate MSCs and adipocyte metabolic control through a metabolic crosstalk between BM microenvironment cells and intercellular mitochondrial transfer in normal and malignant hematopoiesis.

Evaluation of safety and efficacy of allogeneic adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in pediatric bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BoS) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT)

BACKGROUND

Allo-HSCT is a definite approach for the management of a wide variety of lethal and debilitating malignant and non-malignant disorders. However, its two main complications, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), exert significant morbidities and mortalities. BoS, as a manifestation of chronic lung GVHD, is a gruesome complication of allo-HSCT, and for those with steroid-refractory disease, no approved second-line therapies exist. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exert anti-inflammatory and growth-promoting effects, and their administration against a wide range of inflammatory and neurologic disorders, as well as GVHD, has been associated with promising outcomes. However, literature on the safety and effectiveness of MSC therapy for BoS and pediatric cGVHD is scarce.

METHODS

We designed a single-arm trial to administer adipose tissue (AT)-derived MSCs to pediatric patients with refractory BoS after allo-HSCT. AT-MSCs from obese, otherwise healthy donors were cultured in an ISO class 1 clean room and injected into the antecubital vein of eligible patients with a dose of 1 × 106/kg. The primary endpoints included a complete or partial response to therapy [in terms of increased forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) values and steroid dose reduction] and its safety profile.

RESULTS

Four eligible patients with a median age of 6.5 years were enrolled in the study. Steroid-induced osteoporosis and myopathy were present in three cases. A partial response was evident in three cases after a single injection of AT-MSCs. The treatment was safe and tolerable, and no treatment-related adverse events were noted. Two patients developed manageable COVID-19 infections one and 4 months after AT-MSC injection. After a median follow-up duration of 19 months, all cases are still alive and have had no indications for lung transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

AT-MSCs could be safely administered to our pediatric cases with BoS post-allo-HSCT. Considering their advanced stage of disease, their sub-optimal functional capacity due to steroid-induced complications, and COVID-19 infection post-treatment, we believe that AT-MSC therapy can have possible efficacy in the management of pediatric BoS. The conduction of further studies with larger sample sizes and more frequent injections is prudent for further optimization of AT-MSC therapy against BoS. Trial registration Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT), IRCT20201202049568N2. Registered 22 February 2021, https://en.irct.ir/trial/53143 .

A review of the application of mesenchymal stem cells in the field of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective treatment for many malignant hematological diseases. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are nonhematopoietic stem cells with strong self-renewal ability and multidirectional differentiation potential. They have the characteristics of hematopoietic support, immune regulation, tissue repair and regeneration, and homing. Recent studies have shown that HSCT combined with MSC infusion can promote the implantation of hematopoietic stem cells and enhance the reconstruction of hematopoietic function. Researchers have also found that MSCs have good preventive and therapeutic effects on acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), but there is still a lack of validation in large-sample randomized controlled trials. When using MSCs clinically, it is necessary to consider their dose, source, application time, application frequency and other relevant factors, but the specific impact of the above factors on the efficacy of MSCs still needs further clinical trial research. This review introduces the clinical roles of MSCs and summarizes the most recent progress concerning the use of MSCs in the field of HSCT, providing references for the later application of the combination of MSCs and HSCT in hematological diseases.

Human Amniotic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Alleviate aGVHD after allo-HSCT by Regulating Interactions between Gut Microbiota and Intestinal Immunity

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation poses one of the most vexing challenges. Gut microbiota dysbiosis can proceed aGVHD and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have promising therapeutic potential for aGVHD. However, whether hAMSCs affect the gut microbiota during aGVHD mitigation remains unknown. Accordingly, we sought to define the effects and underlying mechanisms of human amniotic membrane-derived MSCs (hAMSCs) regulating the gut microbiota and intestinal immunity in aGVHD. By establishing humanized aGVHD mouse models and hAMSCs treatment, we found that hAMSCs significantly ameliorated aGVHD symptoms, reversed the immune imbalance of T cell subsets and cytokines, and restored intestinal barrier. Moreover, the diversity and composition of gut microbiota were improved upon treatment with hAMSCs. Spearman's correlation analysis showed that there was a correlation between the gut microbiota and tight junction proteins, immune cells as well as cytokines. Our research suggested that hAMSCs alleviated aGVHD by promoting gut microbiota normalization and regulating the interactions between the gut microbiota and intestinal barrier, immunity.

Improved efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cells stably expressing CXCR4 and IL-10 in a xenogeneic graft versus host disease mouse model

Previous clinical trials have shown that mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) can modulate graft versus host disease (GvHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation, although with variable efficacy. To improve the anti-GvHD effect of these cells, adipose tissue derived-human MSCs (Ad-MSCs) were transduced with a lentiviral vector conferring stable expression of CXCR4, a molecule involved in cell migration to inflamed sites, and IL-10, a cytokine with potent anti-inflammatory properties. In vitro experiments showed that the expression of these molecules in Ad-MSCs (named CXCR4-IL10-MSCs) efficiently enhanced their migration towards SDF-1α and also improved their immunomodulatory properties compared to unmodified Ad-MSCs (WT-MSCs). Moreover, using a humanized GvHD mouse model, CXCR4-IL10-MSCs showed improved therapeutic effects, which were confirmed by histopathologic analysis in the target organs. Additionally, compared to WT-MSCs, CXCR4-IL10-MSCs induced a more marked reduction in the number of pro-inflammatory Th1 and Th17 cells, a higher polarization towards an anti-inflammatory T cell profile (CD3⁺-IL10⁺ cells), and increased the number of regulatory T and B cells. Our in vitro and in vivo studies strongly suggest that CXCR4-IL10-MSCs should constitute an important new generation of MSCs for the treatment of GvHD in patients transplanted with allogeneic hematopoietic grafts.

Zelltherapie in den Zeiten von SARS-CoV-2

Ein breites Spektrum von Disruptionen, aber auch blitzschnelle Innovationen, hat die SARS-CoV-2 Pandemie gebracht. Dieser Übersichtsartikel betrachtet die Pandemie aus der Warte der Zelltherapie; konkret werden vier Aspekte untersucht: Wie unterscheiden sich die Risiken von Zelltherapie-Patienten mit SARS-CoV-2 Infektion und COVID von denen der Allgemeinbevölkerung? Sind Empfänger von Zelltherapien, hier speziell autologe und allogene Stammzelltransplantationsempfänger sowie Empfänger von CAR-T-Zell-Präparaten, klinisch relevant durch SARS-CoV-2 Vakzine immunisierbar? Welche Auswirkungen hat die Pandemie mit Spenderausfallrisiko und Zusammenbruch von Supply Chains auf die Versorgung mit Zelltherapeutika? Gibt es Zelltherapeutika, die bei schwerem COVID therapeutisch nutzbringend eingesetzt werden können? In aller Kürze, das erwartete massiv erhöhte Risiko von Zelltherapie-Patienten, im Infektionsfall einen schweren Verlauf zu erleiden oder zu sterben, wurde bestätigt. Die Vakzine induziert jedoch bei vielen dieser Patienten humorale und zelluläre Immunität, wenn auch weniger zuverlässig als bei Gesunden. Dank kreativer Lösungen gelang es, die Versorgung mit Zelltherapeutika im Wesentlichen uneingeschränkt aufrecht zu erhalten. SARS-CoV-2-spezifische T-Zell-Präparate für den adoptiven Immuntransfer wurden entwickelt, eine therapeutische Konstellation diese anzuwenden ergab sich jedoch nicht. Therapiestudien mit mesenchymalen Stromazellen beim schweren COVID laufen weltweit; die Frage der Wirksamkeit bleibt zurzeit offen, bei jedoch substanziellem Optimismus in der Szene. Einige der Erkenntnisse und Innovationen aus der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie können möglicherweise verallgemeinert werden und so auf die Zeit nach ihrem Ende langfristig nachwirken.