Nonclinical Safety Assessment of CFZ533, a Fc-Silent Anti-CD40 Antibody, in Cynomolgus Monkeys

Implications of CD154 and Its Receptors in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

CD154, also known as CD40 ligand, is a costimulatory molecule involved in humoral and adaptive immune responses upon pairing with its classical receptor, CD40. The CD154/CD40 dyad is a key participant in the pathogenesis of many autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In SLE, the major cells at play, T and B lymphocytes, are shown to overexpress CD154 and CD40, respectively. Subsequently, these cells and other CD40-positive cells engage in numerous effector functions contributing to SLE development. With the recent identification of additional receptors for CD154, all belonging to the integrin family, the role of CD154 in SLE is more complex and calls for deeper investigation into its biological significance. Many therapeutic strategies directed against the CD154/CD40 couple have been deployed for the treatment of SLE and proved efficient in animal models and human studies. However, the incidence of thromboembolic complications in patients treated with these anti-CD154/CD40 antibodies halted their further clinical assessments and called for another class of therapies targeting these molecules. Second-generation antibodies directed against CD154 or CD40 are showing promising results in the advanced stages of clinical testing. Our review presents a thorough description of CD154 and its receptors, CD40 and the integrin family members in SLE pathogenesis. All these elements of the CD154 system represent important therapeutic targets for the treatment of SLE.

Single cell transcriptomic analysis of renal allograft rejection reveals novel insights into intragraft TCR clonality

Bulk analysis of renal allograft biopsies (rBx) identified RNA transcripts associated with acute cellular rejection (ACR); however, these lacked cellular context critical to mechanistic understanding. We performed combined single cell RNA transcriptomic and TCRα/β sequencing on rBx from patients with ACR under differing immunosuppression (IS): tacrolimus, iscalimab, and belatacept. TCR analysis revealed a highly restricted CD8 ⁺ T cell clonal expansion (CD8 _EXP ), independent of HLA mismatch or IS type. Subcloning of TCRα/β cDNAs from CD8 _EXP into Jurkat76 cells (TCR ^-/- ) conferred alloreactivity by mixed lymphocyte reaction. scRNAseq analysis of CD8 _EXP revealed effector, memory, and exhausted phenotypes that were influenced by IS type. Successful anti-rejection treatment decreased, but did not eliminate, CD8 _EXP , while CD8 _EXP were maintained during treatment-refractory rejection. Finally, most rBx-derived CD8 _EXP were also observed in matching urine samples. Overall, our data define the clonal CD8 ⁺ T cell response to ACR, providing novel insights to improve detection, assessment, and treatment of rejection.

FcγRs and Their Relevance for the Activity of Anti-CD40 Antibodies

Inhibitory targeting of the CD40L-CD40 system is a promising therapeutic option in the field of organ transplantation and is also attractive in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. After early complex results with neutralizing CD40L antibodies, it turned out that lack of Fcγ receptor (FcγR)-binding is the crucial factor for the development of safe inhibitory antibodies targeting CD40L or CD40. Indeed, in recent years, blocking CD40 antibodies not interacting with FcγRs, has proven to be well tolerated in clinical studies and has shown initial clinical efficacy. Stimulation of CD40 is also of considerable therapeutic interest, especially in cancer immunotherapy. CD40 can be robustly activated by genetically engineered variants of soluble CD40L but also by anti-CD40 antibodies. However, the development of CD40L-based agonists is biotechnologically and pharmacokinetically challenging, and anti-CD40 antibodies typically display only strong agonism in complex with FcγRs or upon secondary crosslinking. The latter, however, typically results in poorly developable mixtures of molecule species of varying stoichiometry and FcγR-binding by anti-CD40 antibodies can elicit unwanted side effects such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) or antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) of CD40 expressing immune cells. Here, we summarize and compare strategies to overcome the unwanted target cell-destroying activity of anti-CD40-FcγR complexes, especially the use of FcγR type-specific mutants and the FcγR-independent cell surface anchoring of bispecific anti-CD40 fusion proteins. Especially, we discuss the therapeutic potential of these strategies in view of the emerging evidence for the dose-limiting activities of systemic CD40 engagement.

Investigational drugs for the treatment of kidney transplant rejection

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant rejection remains an important clinical problem despite the development of effective immunosuppressive drug combination therapy. Two major types of rejection are recognized, namely T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), which have a different pathophysiology and are treated differently. Unfortunately, long-term outcomes of both TCMR and ABMR remain unsatisfactory despite current therapy. Hence, alternative therapeutic drugs are urgently needed.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers novel and investigational drugs for the pharmacological treatment of kidney transplant rejection. Potential therapeutic strategies and future directions are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The development of alternative pharmacologic treatment of rejection has focused mostly on ABMR, since this is the leading cause of kidney allograft loss and currently lacks an effective, evidence-based therapy. At present, there is insufficient high-quality evidence for any of the covered investigational drugs to support their use in ABMR. However, with the emergence of targeted therapies, this potential arises for individualized treatment strategies. In order to generate more high-quality evidence for such strategies and overcome the obstacles of classic, randomized, controlled trials, we advocate the implementation of adaptive trial designs and surrogate clinical endpoints. We believe such adaptive trial designs could help to understand the risks and benefits of promising drugs such as tocilizumab, clazakizumab, belimumab, and imlifidase.

Immunosuppression Profile of CFZ533 (Iscalimab), a Non-Depleting Anti-CD40 Antibody, and the Presence of Opportunistic Infections in a Rhesus Monkey Toxicology Study

CFZ533 (iscalimab) is a nondepleting anti-CD40 antibody intended for inhibition of transplant organ rejection and treatment of autoimmune diseases. In a safety assessment in rhesus monkeys, CFZ533 was administered for 13 weeks up to 150 mg/kg/week subcutaneously. CFZ533 was shown previously to completely inhibit primary and secondary T-cell-dependent antibody responses. CD40 is expressed on B cells, antigen-presenting cells, and endothelial and epithelial cells, but is not expressed on T cells. Here, we demonstrate the complete suppression of germinal center formation in lymphoid organs. CFZ533 was well tolerated and did not cause any dose-limiting toxicity. However, the histological evaluation revealed increased numbers of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells in the T-cell-rich areas of lymph nodes enlarged in response to observed adenovirus and Cryptosporidium infections which suggest that T-cell immune function was unaffected. Background infections appear as the condition leading to unraveling the differential immunosuppressive effects by CFZ533. The presence of T cells at lymph nodes draining sites of infections corroborates the immunosuppressive mechanism, which is different from calcineurin-inhibiting drugs. Furthermore, CFZ533 did not show any hematological or microscopic evidence of thromboembolic events in rhesus monkeys, which were previously shown to respond with thromboembolism to treatment with anti-CD154 antibodies.

CD11b is a novel alternate receptor for CD154 during alloimmunity

Antagonism of the CD154/CD40 pathway is a highly effective means of inducing long-term graft survival in preclinical models. Using a fully allogeneic murine transplant model, we found that CD154 blockade was more effective in prolonging graft survival than was CD40 blockade, raising the possibility that CD154 binds a second receptor. To test this, we queried the impact of CD154 antagonism in the absence of CD40. Data indicated that anti-CD154 functioned to reduce graft-infiltrating CD8+ T cells in both WT and CD40-/- hosts. Because it has recently been reported that CD154 can ligate CD11b, we addressed the impact of blocking CD154-CD11b interactions during transplantation. We utilized a specific peptide antagonist that prevents CD154 binding of CD11b but has no effect on CD154-CD40 interactions. CD154:CD11b antagonism significantly increased the efficacy of anti-CD40 in prolonging allograft survival as compared to anti-CD40 plus control peptide. Mechanistically, CD154:CD11b antagonism functioned to reduce the frequency of graft-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and innate immune cells. These data therefore demonstrate that blocking CD154 interactions with both CD40 and CD11b is required for optimal inhibition of alloimmunity and provide an explanation for why CD40 blockers may be less efficacious than anti-CD154 reagents for the inhibition of allograft rejection.

High Dimensional Renal Profiling: Towards a Better Understanding or Renal Transplant Immune Suppression

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to discuss new approaches to avoid CNI/CCS toxicities with a focus on new biologics and new methods to understand transplant rejection at the single-cell level.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently developed biologics hold significant promise as the next wave of therapeutics designed to promote CNI/CCS-free long-term allograft acceptance. Indeed, belatacept, soluble CTLA4-Ig, is largely devoid of CNI-like toxicities, although it is accompanied by an increased frequency of acute rejection. Besides belatacept, other biologics hold promise as CNI-free immune suppressive approaches. Finally, powerful new single cell approaches can enable characterization of cellular populations that drive rejection within the rejecting allograft.

SUMMARY

We propose that the incorporated single cell profiling into studies investigating new biologics in transplantation, could be tailored to each patient, correlated with potential biomarkers in the blood and urine, and provide a platform where therapeutic targets can be rationally defined, mechanistically-based, and exploited.