1
|
Mancera-Martínez E, Dong Y, Makarian J, Srour O, Thiébeauld O, Jamsheer M, Chicher J, Hammann P, Schepetilnikov M, Ryabova LA. Phosphorylation of a reinitiation supporting protein, RISP, determines its function in translation reinitiation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:6908-6924. [PMID: 34133725 PMCID: PMC8266674 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Reinitiation supporting protein, RISP, interacts with 60S (60S ribosomal subunit) and eIF3 (eukaryotic initiation factor 3) in plants. TOR (target-of-rapamycin) mediates RISP phosphorylation at residue Ser267, favoring its binding to eL24 (60S ribosomal protein L24). In a viral context, RISP, when phosphorylated, binds the CaMV transactivator/ viroplasmin, TAV, to assist in an exceptional mechanism of reinitiation after long ORF translation. Moreover, we show here that RISP interacts with eIF2 via eIF2β and TOR downstream target 40S ribosomal protein eS6. A RISP phosphorylation knockout, RISP-S267A, binds preferentially eIF2β, and both form a ternary complex with eIF3a in vitro. Accordingly, transient overexpression in plant protoplasts of RISP-S267A, but not a RISP phosphorylation mimic, RISP-S267D, favors translation initiation. In contrast, RISP-S267D preferentially binds eS6, and, when bound to the C-terminus of eS6, can capture 60S in a highly specific manner in vitro, suggesting that it mediates 60S loading during reinitiation. Indeed, eS6-deficient plants are highly resistant to CaMV due to their reduced reinitiation capacity. Strikingly, an eS6 phosphomimic, when stably expressed in eS6-deficient plants, can fully restore the reinitiation deficiency of these plants in cellular and viral contexts. These results suggest that RISP function in translation (re)initiation is regulated by phosphorylation at Ser267.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eder Mancera-Martínez
- Institut de biologie de moléculaire des plantes UPR2357 du CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Yihan Dong
- Institut de biologie de moléculaire des plantes UPR2357 du CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Joelle Makarian
- Institut de biologie de moléculaire des plantes UPR2357 du CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Ola Srour
- Institut de biologie de moléculaire des plantes UPR2357 du CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Odon Thiébeauld
- Institut de biologie de moléculaire des plantes UPR2357 du CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Muhammed Jamsheer
- Institut de biologie de moléculaire des plantes UPR2357 du CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Johana Chicher
- Plateforme protéomique Strasbourg Esplanade FRC1589 du CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Philippe Hammann
- Plateforme protéomique Strasbourg Esplanade FRC1589 du CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Mikhail Schepetilnikov
- Institut de biologie de moléculaire des plantes UPR2357 du CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lyubov A Ryabova
- Institut de biologie de moléculaire des plantes UPR2357 du CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alers-Velazquez R, Jacques S, Muller C, Boldt J, Schoelz J, Leisner S. Cauliflower mosaic virus P6 inclusion body formation: A dynamic and intricate process. Virology 2021; 553:9-22. [PMID: 33197754 DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2020.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
During an infection, Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) forms inclusion bodies (IBs) mainly composed of viral protein P6, where viral activities occur. Because viral processes occur in IBs, understanding the mechanisms by which they are formed is crucial. FL-P6 expressed in N. benthamiana leaves formed IBs of a variety of shapes and sizes. Small IBs were dynamic, undergoing fusion/dissociation events. Co-expression of actin-binding polypeptides with FL-P6 altered IB size distribution and inhibited movement. This suggests that IB movement is required for fusion and growth. A P6 deletion mutant was discovered that formed a single large IB per cell, which suggests it exhibited altered fusion/dissociation dynamics. Myosin-inhibiting drugs did not affect small IB movement, while those inhibiting actin polymerization did. Large IBs colocalized with components of the aggresome pathway, while small ones generally did not. This suggests a possible involvement of the aggresome pathway in large IB formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Alers-Velazquez
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, 2801 West Bancroft Street, Mail Stop 601, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA
| | - Sarah Jacques
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, 2801 West Bancroft Street, Mail Stop 601, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA
| | - Clare Muller
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, 2801 West Bancroft Street, Mail Stop 601, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA
| | - Jennifer Boldt
- USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Application Technology Research Unit, 2801 West Bancroft Street, Mail Stop 604, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA
| | - James Schoelz
- Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA
| | - Scott Leisner
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, 2801 West Bancroft Street, Mail Stop 601, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lukhovitskaya N, Ryabova LA. Cauliflower mosaic virus transactivator protein (TAV) can suppress nonsense-mediated decay by targeting VARICOSE, a scaffold protein of the decapping complex. Sci Rep 2019; 9:7042. [PMID: 31065034 PMCID: PMC6504953 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43414-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
During pathogenesis, viruses hijack the host cellular machinery to access molecules and sub-cellular structures needed for infection. We have evidence that the multifunctional viral translation transactivator/viroplasmin (TAV) protein from Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) can function as a suppressor of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD). TAV interacts specifically with a scaffold protein of the decapping complex VARICOSE (VCS) in the yeast two-hybrid system, and co-localizes with components of the decapping complex in planta. Notably, plants transgenic for TAV accumulate endogenous NMD-elicited mRNAs, while decay of AU-rich instability element (ARE)-signal containing mRNAs are not affected. Using an agroinfiltration-based transient assay we confirmed that TAV specifically stabilizes mRNA containing a premature termination codon (PTC) in a VCS-dependent manner. We have identified a TAV motif consisting of 12 of the 520 amino acids in the full-length sequence that is critical for both VCS binding and the NMD suppression effect. Our data suggest that TAV can intercept NMD by targeting the decapping machinery through the scaffold protein VARICOSE, indicating that 5'-3' mRNA decapping is a late step in NMD-related mRNA degradation in plants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Lukhovitskaya
- Institut de biologie moléculaire des plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Division of Virology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QP, UK
| | - Lyubov A Ryabova
- Institut de biologie moléculaire des plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leisner SM, Schoelz JE. Joining the Crowd: Integrating Plant Virus Proteins into the Larger World of Pathogen Effectors. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2018; 56:89-110. [PMID: 29852091 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-050151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The first bacterial and viral avirulence ( avr) genes were cloned in 1984. Although virus and bacterial avr genes were physically isolated in the same year, the questions associated with their characterization after discovery were very different, and these differences had a profound influence on the narrative of host-pathogen interactions for the past 30 years. Bacterial avr proteins were subsequently shown to suppress host defenses, leading to their reclassification as effectors, whereas research on viral avr proteins centered on their role in the viral infection cycle rather than their effect on host defenses. Recent studies that focus on the multifunctional nature of plant virus proteins have shown that some virus proteins are capable of suppression of the same host defenses as bacterial effectors. This is exemplified by the P6 protein of Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV), a multifunctional plant virus protein that facilitates several steps in the infection, including modulation of host defenses. This review highlights the modular structure and multifunctional nature of CaMV P6 and illustrates its similarities to other, well-established pathogen effectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott M Leisner
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606, USA
| | - James E Schoelz
- Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pooggin MM, Ryabova LA. Ribosome Shunting, Polycistronic Translation, and Evasion of Antiviral Defenses in Plant Pararetroviruses and Beyond. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:644. [PMID: 29692761 PMCID: PMC5902531 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Viruses have compact genomes and usually translate more than one protein from polycistronic RNAs using leaky scanning, frameshifting, stop codon suppression or reinitiation mechanisms. Viral (pre-)genomic RNAs often contain long 5′-leader sequences with short upstream open reading frames (uORFs) and secondary structure elements, which control both translation initiation and replication. In plants, viral RNA and DNA are targeted by RNA interference (RNAi) generating small RNAs that silence viral gene expression, while viral proteins are recognized by innate immunity and autophagy that restrict viral infection. In this review we focus on plant pararetroviruses of the family Caulimoviridae and describe the mechanisms of uORF- and secondary structure-driven ribosome shunting, leaky scanning and reinitiation after translation of short and long uORFs. We discuss conservation of these mechanisms in different genera of Caulimoviridae, including host genome-integrated endogenous viral elements, as well as in other viral families, and highlight a multipurpose use of the highly-structured leader sequence of plant pararetroviruses in regulation of translation, splicing, packaging, and reverse transcription of pregenomic RNA (pgRNA), and in evasion of RNAi. Furthermore, we illustrate how targeting of several host factors by a pararetroviral effector protein can lead to transactivation of viral polycistronic translation and concomitant suppression of antiviral defenses. Thus, activation of the plant protein kinase target of rapamycin (TOR) by the Cauliflower mosaic virus transactivator/viroplasmin (TAV) promotes reinitiation of translation after long ORFs on viral pgRNA and blocks antiviral autophagy and innate immunity responses, while interaction of TAV with the plant RNAi machinery interferes with antiviral silencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikhail M Pooggin
- INRA, UMR Biologie et Génétique des Interactions Plante-Parasite, Montpellier, France
| | - Lyubov A Ryabova
- Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UPR 2357, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schoelz JE, Leisner S. Setting Up Shop: The Formation and Function of the Viral Factories of Cauliflower mosaic virus. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2017; 8:1832. [PMID: 29163571 PMCID: PMC5670102 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Similar to cells, viruses often compartmentalize specific functions such as genome replication or particle assembly. Viral compartments may contain host organelle membranes or they may be mainly composed of viral proteins. These compartments are often termed: inclusion bodies (IBs), viroplasms or viral factories. The same virus may form more than one type of IB, each with different functions, as illustrated by the plant pararetrovirus, Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV). CaMV forms two distinct types of IBs in infected plant cells, those composed mainly of the viral proteins P2 (which are responsible for transmission of CaMV by insect vectors) and P6 (required for viral intra-and inter-cellular infection), respectively. P6 IBs are the major focus of this review. Much of our understanding of the formation and function of P6 IBs comes from the analyses of their major protein component, P6. Over time, the interactions and functions of P6 have been gradually elucidated. Coupled with new technologies, such as fluorescence microscopy with fluorophore-tagged viral proteins, these data complement earlier work and provide a clearer picture of P6 IB formation. As the activities and interactions of the viral proteins have gradually been determined, the functions of P6 IBs have become clearer. This review integrates the current state of knowledge on the formation and function of P6 IBs to produce a coherent model for the activities mediated by these sophisticated virus-manufacturing machines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E. Schoelz
- Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - Scott Leisner
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bhor SA, Tateda C, Mochizuki T, Sekine KT, Yaeno T, Yamaoka N, Nishiguchi M, Kobayashi K. Inducible transgenic tobacco system to study the mechanisms underlying chlorosis mediated by the silencing of chloroplast heat shock protein 90. Virusdisease 2017; 28:81-92. [PMID: 28466059 PMCID: PMC5377861 DOI: 10.1007/s13337-017-0361-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2016] [Accepted: 01/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Chlorosis is one of the most common symptoms of plant diseases, including those caused by viruses and viroids. Recently, a study has shown that Peach latent mosaic viroid (PLMVd) exploits host RNA silencing machinery to modulate the virus disease symptoms through the silencing of chloroplast-targeted heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90C). To understand the molecular mechanisms of chlorosis in this viroid disease, we established an experimental system suitable for studying the mechanism underlying the chlorosis induced by the RNA silencing of Hsp90C in transgenic tobacco. Hairpin RNA of the Hsp90C-specific region was expressed under the control of a dexamethasone-inducible promoter, resulted in the silencing of Hsp90C gene in 2 days and the chlorosis along with growth suppression phenotypes. Time course study suggests that a sign of chlorosis can be monitored as early as 2 days, suggesting that this experimental model is suitable for studying the molecular events taken place before and after the onset of chlorosis. During the early phase of chlorosis development, the chloroplast- and photosynthesis-related genes were downregulated. It should be noted that some pathogenesis related genes were upregulated during the early phase of chlorosis in spite of the absence of any pathogen-derived molecules in this system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Ashok Bhor
- The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8566 Japan
| | - Chika Tateda
- Iwate Biotechnology Research Center, Kitakami, Iwate 024-0003 Japan
| | - Tomofumi Mochizuki
- Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai, Osaka 599-8531 Japan
| | - Ken-Taro Sekine
- Iwate Biotechnology Research Center, Kitakami, Iwate 024-0003 Japan
- Faculty of Agriculture, University of the Ryukyus, Nakagami, Okinawa 903-0213 Japan
| | - Takashi Yaeno
- The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8566 Japan
- Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, 3-5-7 Tarumi, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8566 Japan
- Research Unit for Citromics, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8566 Japan
| | - Naoto Yamaoka
- The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8566 Japan
- Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, 3-5-7 Tarumi, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8566 Japan
| | - Masamichi Nishiguchi
- Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, 3-5-7 Tarumi, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8566 Japan
| | - Kappei Kobayashi
- The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8566 Japan
- Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, 3-5-7 Tarumi, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8566 Japan
- Research Unit for Citromics, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8566 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang Y, Hajimorad MR. Gain of virulence by Soybean mosaic virus on Rsv4-genotype soybeans is associated with a relative fitness loss in a susceptible host. MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2016; 17:1154-9. [PMID: 26662495 PMCID: PMC6638382 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
'Gene-for-gene' theory predicts that gain of virulence by an avirulent pathogen on plants expressing resistance (R) genes is associated with fitness loss in susceptible hosts. However, the validity of this prediction has been studied in only a few plant viral pathosystems. In this study, the Soybean mosaic virus (SMV)-Rsv4 pathosystem was exploited to test this prediction. In Rsv4-genotype soybeans, P3 of avirulent SMV strains provokes an as yet uncharacterized resistance mechanism that restricts the invading virus to the inoculated leaves. A single amino acid substitution in P3 functionally converts an avirulent to a virulent strain, suggesting that the genetic composition of P3 plays a crucial role in virulence on Rsv4-genotype soybeans. In this study, we examined the impact of gain of virulence mutation(s) on the fitness of virulent variants derived from three avirulent SMV strains in a soybean genotype lacking the Rsv4 gene. Our data demonstrate that gain of virulence mutation(s) by all avirulent viruses on Rsv4-genotype soybean is associated with a relative fitness loss in a susceptible host. The implications of this finding on the durable deployment of the Rsv4 gene in soybean are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Wang
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA
| | - M R Hajimorad
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zvereva AS, Golyaev V, Turco S, Gubaeva EG, Rajeswaran R, Schepetilnikov MV, Srour O, Ryabova LA, Boller T, Pooggin MM. Viral protein suppresses oxidative burst and salicylic acid-dependent autophagy and facilitates bacterial growth on virus-infected plants. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2016; 211:1020-34. [PMID: 27120694 DOI: 10.1111/nph.13967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/11/2016] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Virus interactions with plant silencing and innate immunity pathways can potentially alter the susceptibility of virus-infected plants to secondary infections with nonviral pathogens. We found that Arabidopsis plants infected with Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) or transgenic for CaMV silencing suppressor P6 exhibit increased susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) and allow robust growth of the Pst mutant hrcC-, which cannot deploy effectors to suppress innate immunity. The impaired antibacterial defense correlated with the suppressed oxidative burst, reduced accumulation of the defense hormone salicylic acid (SA) and diminished SA-dependent autophagy. The viral protein domain required for suppression of these plant defense responses is dispensable for silencing suppression but essential for binding and activation of the plant target-of-rapamycin (TOR) kinase which, in its active state, blocks cellular autophagy and promotes CaMV translation. Our findings imply that CaMV P6 is a versatile viral effector suppressing both silencing and innate immunity. P6-mediated suppression of oxidative burst and SA-dependent autophagy may predispose CaMV-infected plants to bacterial infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna S Zvereva
- Department of Environmental Sciences, Botany, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 1, Basel, 4056, Switzerland
| | - Victor Golyaev
- Department of Environmental Sciences, Botany, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 1, Basel, 4056, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Turco
- Department of Environmental Sciences, Botany, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 1, Basel, 4056, Switzerland
| | - Ekaterina G Gubaeva
- Department of Environmental Sciences, Botany, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 1, Basel, 4056, Switzerland
| | - Rajendran Rajeswaran
- Department of Environmental Sciences, Botany, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 1, Basel, 4056, Switzerland
| | - Mikhail V Schepetilnikov
- Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes du CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg Cedex, 67084, France
| | - Ola Srour
- Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes du CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg Cedex, 67084, France
| | - Lyubov A Ryabova
- Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes du CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg Cedex, 67084, France
| | - Thomas Boller
- Department of Environmental Sciences, Botany, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 1, Basel, 4056, Switzerland
| | - Mikhail M Pooggin
- Department of Environmental Sciences, Botany, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 1, Basel, 4056, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Podevin N, du Jardin P. Possible consequences of the overlap between the CaMV 35S promoter regions in plant transformation vectors used and the viral gene VI in transgenic plants. GM CROPS & FOOD 2014; 3:296-300. [DOI: 10.4161/gmcr.21406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
11
|
The temporal evolution and global spread of Cauliflower mosaic virus, a plant pararetrovirus. PLoS One 2014; 9:e85641. [PMID: 24465629 PMCID: PMC3897471 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2013] [Accepted: 12/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) is a plant pararetrovirus with a double-stranded DNA genome. It is the type member of the genus Caulimovirus in the family Caulimoviridae. CaMV is transmitted by sap inoculation and in nature by aphids in a semi-persistent manner. To investigate the patterns and timescale of CaMV migration and evolution, we sequenced and analyzed the genomes of 67 isolates of CaMV collected mostly in Greece, Iran, Turkey, and Japan together with nine published sequences. We identified the open-reading frames (ORFs) in the genomes and inferred their phylogeny. After removing recombinant sequences, we estimated the substitution rates, divergence times, and phylogeographic patterns of the virus populations. We found that recombination has been a common feature of CaMV evolution, and that ORFs I–V have a different evolutionary history from ORF VI. The ORFs have evolved at rates between 1.71 and 5.81×10−4 substitutions/site/year, similar to those of viruses with RNA or ssDNA genomes. We found four geographically confined lineages. CaMV probably spread from a single population to other parts of the world around 400–500 years ago, and is now widely distributed among Eurasian countries. Our results revealed evidence of frequent gene flow between populations in Turkey and those of its neighboring countries, with similar patterns observed for Japan and the USA. Our study represents the first report on the spatial and temporal spread of a plant pararetrovirus.
Collapse
|
12
|
Khatabi B, Wen RH, Hajimorad MR. Fitness penalty in susceptible host is associated with virulence of Soybean mosaic virus on Rsv1-genotype soybean: a consequence of perturbation of HC-Pro and not P3. MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2013; 14:885-97. [PMID: 23782556 PMCID: PMC6638797 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
The multigenic Rsv1 locus in the soybean plant introduction (PI) 'PI96983' confers extreme resistance against the majority of Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) strains, including SMV-N, but not SMV-G7 and SMV-G7d. In contrast, in susceptible soybean cultivars lacking a functional Rsv1 locus, such as 'Williams82' (rsv1), SMV-N induces severe disease symptoms and accumulates to a high level, whereas both SMV-G7 and SMV-G7d induce mild symptoms and accumulate to a significantly lower level. Gain of virulence by SMV-N on Rsv1-genotype soybean requires concurrent mutations in both the helper-component proteinase (HC-Pro) and P3 cistrons. This is because of the presence of at least two resistance (R) genes, probably belonging to the nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) class, within the Rsv1 locus, independently mediating the recognition of HC-Pro or P3. In this study, we show that the majority of experimentally evolved mutational pathways that disrupt the avirulence functions of SMV-N on Rsv1-genotype soybean also result in mild symptoms and reduced accumulation, relative to parental SMV-N, in Williams82 (rsv1). Furthermore, the evaluation of SMV-N-derived HC-Pro and P3 chimeras, containing homologous sequences from virulent SMV-G7 or SMV-G7d strains, as well as SMV-N-derived variants containing HC-Pro or P3 point mutation(s) associated with gain of virulence, reveals a direct correlation between the perturbation of HC-Pro and a fitness penalty in Williams82 (rsv1). Collectively, these data demonstrate that gain of virulence by SMV on Rsv1-genotype soybean results in fitness loss in a previously susceptible soybean genotype, this being a consequence of mutations in HC-Pro, but not in P3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Khatabi
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Laird J, McInally C, Carr C, Doddiah S, Yates G, Chrysanthou E, Khattab A, Love AJ, Geri C, Sadanandom A, Smith BO, Kobayashi K, Milner JJ. Identification of the domains of cauliflower mosaic virus protein P6 responsible for suppression of RNA silencing and salicylic acid signalling. J Gen Virol 2013; 94:2777-2789. [PMID: 24088344 PMCID: PMC3836500 DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.057729-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) encodes a 520 aa polypeptide, P6, which participates in several essential activities in the virus life cycle including suppressing RNA silencing and salicylic acid-responsive defence signalling. We infected Arabidopsis with CaMV mutants containing short in-frame deletions within the P6 ORF. A deletion in the distal end of domain D-I (the N-terminal 112 aa) of P6 did not affect virus replication but compromised symptom development and curtailed the ability to restore GFP fluorescence in a GFP-silenced transgenic Arabidopsis line. A deletion in the minimum transactivator domain was defective in virus replication but retained the capacity to suppress RNA silencing locally. Symptom expression in CaMV-infected plants is apparently linked to the ability to suppress RNA silencing. When transiently co-expressed with tomato bushy stunt virus P19, an elicitor of programmed cell death in Nicotiana tabacum, WT P6 suppressed the hypersensitive response, but three mutants, two with deletions within the distal end of domain D-I and one involving the N-terminal nuclear export signal (NES), were unable to do so. Deleting the N-terminal 20 aa also abolished the suppression of pathogen-associated molecular pattern-dependent PR1a expression following agroinfiltration. However, the two other deletions in domain D-I retained this activity, evidence that the mechanisms underlying these functions are not identical. The D-I domain of P6 when expressed alone failed to suppress either cell death or PR1a expression and is therefore necessary but not sufficient for all three defence suppression activities. Consequently, concerns about the biosafety of genetically modified crops carrying truncated ORFVI sequences appear unfounded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Laird
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Carol McInally
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Craig Carr
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Sowjanya Doddiah
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Gary Yates
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Elina Chrysanthou
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Ahmed Khattab
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Andrew J Love
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Chiara Geri
- Istituto di Biologia e Biotechnologia Agraria, Consiglio Nazionale Delle Richerche, Pisa, Italy.,Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Ari Sadanandom
- School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
| | - Brian O Smith
- Institute of Molecular Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Kappei Kobayashi
- Plant Molecular Biology and Virology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, Ehime 790-8566, Japan
| | - Joel J Milner
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hohn T. Plant pararetroviruses: interactions of cauliflower mosaic virus with plants and insects. Curr Opin Virol 2013; 3:629-38. [PMID: 24075119 DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2013.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2013] [Revised: 08/26/2013] [Accepted: 08/26/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Virion associated protein (VAP) binds to the icosahedral capsid of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) - a plant pararetrovirus. The interactive coiled-coil domains of this protein can interact with the coiled-coils of either the movement protein or the aphid transmission factor, thereby mediating both cell-to-cell movement and aphid transmission. The host counters CaMV infection with two lines of defense: innate immunity and silencing. The viral protein 'transactivator/viroplasmin' (TAV) is recognized as an effector and either initiates the innate immunity reaction in a non-permissive host or interferes with it in a permissive host. As a silencing suppressor, TAV interferes with dicing of dsRNAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Hohn
- Basel University, Botanical Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Angel CA, Lutz L, Yang X, Rodriguez A, Adair A, Zhang Y, Leisner SM, Nelson RS, Schoelz JE. The P6 protein of Cauliflower mosaic virus interacts with CHUP1, a plant protein which moves chloroplasts on actin microfilaments. Virology 2013; 443:363-74. [DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2013] [Revised: 03/11/2013] [Accepted: 05/18/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
16
|
Pooggin MM. How can plant DNA viruses evade siRNA-directed DNA methylation and silencing? Int J Mol Sci 2013; 14:15233-59. [PMID: 23887650 PMCID: PMC3759858 DOI: 10.3390/ijms140815233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2013] [Revised: 07/01/2013] [Accepted: 07/01/2013] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Plants infected with DNA viruses produce massive quantities of virus-derived, 24-nucleotide short interfering RNAs (siRNAs), which can potentially direct viral DNA methylation and transcriptional silencing. However, growing evidence indicates that the circular double-stranded DNA accumulating in the nucleus for Pol II-mediated transcription of viral genes is not methylated. Hence, DNA viruses most likely evade or suppress RNA-directed DNA methylation. This review describes the specialized mechanisms of replication and silencing evasion evolved by geminiviruses and pararetoviruses, which rescue viral DNA from repressive methylation and interfere with transcriptional and post-transcriptional silencing of viral genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikhail M Pooggin
- University of Basel, Department of Environmental Sciences, Botany, Schönbeinstrasse 6, Basel 4056, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
The frontline of plant defense against non-viral pathogens such as bacteria, fungi and oomycetes is provided by transmembrane pattern recognition receptors that detect conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), leading to pattern-triggered immunity (PTI). To counteract this innate defense, pathogens deploy effector proteins with a primary function to suppress PTI. In specific cases, plants have evolved intracellular resistance (R) proteins detecting isolate-specific pathogen effectors, leading to effector-triggered immunity (ETI), an amplified version of PTI, often associated with hypersensitive response (HR) and programmed cell death (PCD). In the case of plant viruses, no conserved PAMP was identified so far and the primary plant defense is thought to be based mainly on RNA silencing, an evolutionary conserved, sequence-specific mechanism that regulates gene expression and chromatin states and represses invasive nucleic acids such as transposons. Endogenous silencing pathways generate 21-24 nt small (s)RNAs, miRNAs and short interfering (si)RNAs, that repress genes post-transcriptionally and/or transcriptionally. Four distinct Dicer-like (DCL) proteins, which normally produce endogenous miRNAs and siRNAs, all contribute to the biogenesis of viral siRNAs in infected plants. Growing evidence indicates that RNA silencing also contributes to plant defense against non-viral pathogens. Conversely, PTI-based innate responses may contribute to antiviral defense. Intracellular R proteins of the same NB-LRR family are able to recognize both non-viral effectors and avirulence (Avr) proteins of RNA viruses, and, as a result, trigger HR and PCD in virus-resistant hosts. In some cases, viral Avr proteins also function as silencing suppressors. We hypothesize that RNA silencing and innate immunity (PTI and ETI) function in concert to fight plant viruses. Viruses counteract this dual defense by effectors that suppress both PTI-/ETI-based innate responses and RNA silencing to establish successful infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna S Zvereva
- Institute of Botany, University of Basel, Schönbeinstrasse 6, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Love AJ, Geri C, Laird J, Carr C, Yun BW, Loake GJ, Tada Y, Sadanandom A, Milner JJ. Cauliflower mosaic virus protein P6 inhibits signaling responses to salicylic acid and regulates innate immunity. PLoS One 2012; 7:e47535. [PMID: 23071821 PMCID: PMC3469532 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2012] [Accepted: 09/12/2012] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) encodes a multifunctional protein P6 that is required for translation of the 35S RNA and also acts as a suppressor of RNA silencing. Here we demonstrate that P6 additionally acts as a pathogenicity effector of an unique and novel type, modifying NPR1 (a key regulator of salicylic acid (SA)- and jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent signaling) and inhibiting SA-dependent defence responses We find that that transgene-mediated expression of P6 in Arabidopsis and transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana has profound effects on defence signaling, suppressing expression of representative SA-responsive genes and increasing expression of representative JA-responsive genes. Relative to wild-type Arabidopsis P6-expressing transgenics had greatly reduced expression of PR-1 following SA-treatment, infection by CaMV or inoculation with an avirulent bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst). Similarly transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana of P6 (including a mutant form defective in translational transactivation activity) suppressed PR-1a transcript accumulation in response to Agrobacterium infiltration and following SA-treatment. As well as suppressing the expression of representative SA-regulated genes, P6-transgenic Arabidopsis showed greatly enhanced susceptibility to both virulent and avirulent Pst (titres elevated 10 to 30-fold compared to non-transgenic controls) but reduced susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea. Necrosis following SA-treatment or inoculation with avirulent Pst was reduced and delayed in P6-transgenics. NPR1 an important regulator of SA/JA crosstalk, was more highly expressed in the presence of P6 and introduction of the P6 transgene into a transgenic line expressing an NPR1:GFP fusion resulted in greatly increased fluorescence in nuclei even in the absence of SA. Thus in the presence of P6 an inactive form of NPR1 is mislocalized in the nucleus even in uninduced plants. These results demonstrate that P6 is a new type of pathogenicity effector protein that enhances susceptibility to biotrophic pathogens by suppressing SA- but enhancing JA-signaling responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J. Love
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular, Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Chiara Geri
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular, Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
- Istituto di Biologia e Biotechnologia Agraria, Consiglio Nazionale Delle Richerche, Pisa, Italy
| | - Janet Laird
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular, Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Craig Carr
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular, Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Byung-Wook Yun
- Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Gary J. Loake
- Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Yasuomi Tada
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Ari Sadanandom
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular, Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Joel J. Milner
- Plant Science Research Theme, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular, Cellular and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Scholthof KBG, Adkins S, Czosnek H, Palukaitis P, Jacquot E, Hohn T, Hohn B, Saunders K, Candresse T, Ahlquist P, Hemenway C, Foster GD. Top 10 plant viruses in molecular plant pathology. MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2011; 12:938-54. [PMID: 22017770 PMCID: PMC6640423 DOI: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00752.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 625] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Many scientists, if not all, feel that their particular plant virus should appear in any list of the most important plant viruses. However, to our knowledge, no such list exists. The aim of this review was to survey all plant virologists with an association with Molecular Plant Pathology and ask them to nominate which plant viruses they would place in a 'Top 10' based on scientific/economic importance. The survey generated more than 250 votes from the international community, and allowed the generation of a Top 10 plant virus list for Molecular Plant Pathology. The Top 10 list includes, in rank order, (1) Tobacco mosaic virus, (2) Tomato spotted wilt virus, (3) Tomato yellow leaf curl virus, (4) Cucumber mosaic virus, (5) Potato virus Y, (6) Cauliflower mosaic virus, (7) African cassava mosaic virus, (8) Plum pox virus, (9) Brome mosaic virus and (10) Potato virus X, with honourable mentions for viruses just missing out on the Top 10, including Citrus tristeza virus, Barley yellow dwarf virus, Potato leafroll virus and Tomato bushy stunt virus. This review article presents a short review on each virus of the Top 10 list and its importance, with the intent of initiating discussion and debate amongst the plant virology community, as well as laying down a benchmark, as it will be interesting to see in future years how perceptions change and which viruses enter and leave the Top 10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen-Beth G Scholthof
- Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, 2132 TAMU, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2132, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hohn T, Vazquez F. RNA silencing pathways of plants: silencing and its suppression by plant DNA viruses. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS 2011; 1809:588-600. [PMID: 21683815 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2011] [Revised: 06/01/2011] [Accepted: 06/02/2011] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
RNA silencing refers to processes that depend on small (s)RNAs to regulate the expression of eukaryotic genomes. In plants, these processes play critical roles in development, in responses to a wide array of stresses, in maintaining genome integrity and in defense against viral and bacterial pathogens. We provide here an updated view on the array of endogenous sRNA pathways, including microRNAs (miRNAs), discovered in the model plant Arabidopsis, which are also the basis for antiviral silencing. We emphasize the current knowledge as well as the recent advances made on understanding the defense and counter-defense strategies evolved in the arms race between plants and DNA viruses on both the nuclear and the cytoplasmic front. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: MicroRNA's in viral gene regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Hohn
- Institute of Botany, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Shivaprasad PV, Rajeswaran R, Blevins T, Schoelz J, Meins F, Hohn T, Pooggin MM. The CaMV transactivator/viroplasmin interferes with RDR6-dependent trans-acting and secondary siRNA pathways in Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:5896-909. [PMID: 18801846 PMCID: PMC2566869 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Several RNA silencing pathways in plants restrict viral infections and are suppressed by distinct viral proteins. Here we show that the endogenous trans-acting (ta)siRNA pathway, which depends on Dicer-like (DCL) 4 and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RDR) 6, is suppressed by infection of Arabidopsis with Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV). This effect was associated with overaccumulation of unprocessed, RDR6-dependent precursors of tasiRNAs and is due solely to expression of the CaMV transactivator/viroplasmin (TAV) protein. TAV expression also impaired secondary, but not primary, siRNA production from a silenced transgene and increased accumulation of mRNAs normally silenced by the four known tasiRNA families and RDR6-dependent secondary siRNAs. Moreover, TAV expression upregulated DCL4, DRB4 and AGO7 that mediate tasiRNA biogenesis. Our findings suggest that TAV is a general inhibitor of silencing amplification that impairs DCL4-mediated processing of RDR6-dependent double-stranded RNA to siRNAs. The resulting deficiency in tasiRNAs and other RDR6-/DCL4-dependent siRNAs appears to trigger a feedback mechanism that compensates for the inhibitory effects.
Collapse
|
23
|
Chiba S, Miyanishi M, Andika IB, Kondo H, Tamada T. Identification of amino acids of the beet necrotic yellow vein virus p25 protein required for induction of the resistance response in leaves of Beta vulgaris plants. J Gen Virol 2008; 89:1314-1323. [PMID: 18420811 DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.83624-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The RNA3-encoded p25 protein of beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) is responsible for the production of rhizomania symptoms of sugar beet roots (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris). Here, it was found that the presence of the p25 protein is also associated with the resistance response in rub-inoculated leaves of sugar beet and wild beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima) plants. The resistance phenotype displayed a range of symptoms from no visible lesions to necrotic or greyish lesions at the inoculation site, and only very low levels of virus and viral RNA accumulated. The susceptible phenotype showed large, bright yellow lesions and developed high levels of virus accumulation. In roots after Polymyxa betae vector inoculation, however, no drastic differences in virus and viral RNA accumulation levels were found between plants with susceptible and resistant phenotypes, except at an early stage of infection. There was a genotype-specific interaction between BNYVV strains and two selected wild beet lines (MR1 and MR2) and sugar beet cultivars. Sequence analysis of natural BNYVV isolates and site-directed mutagenesis of the p25 protein revealed that 3 aa residues at positions 68, 70 and 179 are important in determining the resistance phenotype, and that host-genotype specificity is controlled by single amino acid changes at position 68. The mechanism of the occurrence of resistance-breaking BNYVV strains is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soutaro Chiba
- Research Institute for Bioresources, Okayama University, Kurashiki, Okayama 710-0046, Japan
| | - Masaki Miyanishi
- Research Institute for Bioresources, Okayama University, Kurashiki, Okayama 710-0046, Japan
| | - Ida Bagus Andika
- Research Institute for Bioresources, Okayama University, Kurashiki, Okayama 710-0046, Japan
| | - Hideki Kondo
- Research Institute for Bioresources, Okayama University, Kurashiki, Okayama 710-0046, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Tamada
- Research Institute for Bioresources, Okayama University, Kurashiki, Okayama 710-0046, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sun W, Dunning FM, Pfund C, Weingarten R, Bent AF. Within-species flagellin polymorphism in Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris and its impact on elicitation of Arabidopsis FLAGELLIN SENSING2-dependent defenses. THE PLANT CELL 2006; 18:764-79. [PMID: 16461584 PMCID: PMC1383648 DOI: 10.1105/tpc.105.037648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Bacterial flagellins have been portrayed as a relatively invariant pathogen-associated molecular pattern. We have found within-species, within-pathovar variation for defense-eliciting activity of flagellins among Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris (Xcc) strains. Arabidopsis thaliana FLAGELLIN SENSING2 (FLS2), a transmembrane leucine-rich repeat kinase, confers flagellin responsiveness. The flg22 region was the only Xcc flagellin region responsible for detectable elicitation of Arabidopsis defense responses. A Val-43/Asp polymorphism determined the eliciting/noneliciting nature of Xcc flagellins (structural gene fliC). Arabidopsis detected flagellins carrying Asp-43 or Asn-43 but not Val-43 or Ala-43, and it responded minimally for Glu-43. Wild-type Xcc strains carrying nonrecognized flagellin were more virulent than those carrying a recognized flagellin when infiltrated into Arabidopsis leaf mesophyll, but this correlation was misleading. Isogenic Xcc fliC gene replacement strains expressing eliciting or noneliciting flagellins grew similarly, both in leaf mesophyll and in hydathode/vascular colonization assays. The plant FLS2 genotype also had no detectable effect on disease outcome when previously untreated plants were infected by Xcc. However, resistance against Xcc was enhanced if FLS2-dependent responses were elicited 1 d before Xcc infection. Prior immunization was not required for FLS2-dependent restriction of Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato. We conclude that plant immune systems do not uniformly detect all flagellins of a particular pathogen species and that Xcc can evade Arabidopsis FLS2-mediated defenses unless the FLS2 system has been activated by previous infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenxian Sun
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schornack S, Meyer A, Römer P, Jordan T, Lahaye T. Gene-for-gene-mediated recognition of nuclear-targeted AvrBs3-like bacterial effector proteins. JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 2006; 163:256-72. [PMID: 16403589 DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2005] [Revised: 12/02/2005] [Accepted: 12/02/2005] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Plant disease resistance (R) genes mediate specific recognition of pathogens via perception of cognate avirulence (avr) gene products. The numerous highly similar AvrBs3-like proteins from the bacterial genus Xanthomonas provide together with their corresponding R proteins a unique biological resource to dissect the molecular basis of recognition specificity. A central question in this context is if R proteins that mediate recognition of structurally similar Avr proteins are themselves functionally similar or rather dissimilar. The recent isolation of rice xa5, rice Xa27 and tomato Bs4, R genes that collectively mediate recognition of avrBs3-like genes, provides a first clue to the molecular mechanisms that plants employ to detect AvrBs3-like proteins. Their initial characterization suggests that these R proteins are structurally and functionally surprisingly diverge. This review summarizes the current knowledge on R-protein-mediated recognition of AvrBs3-like proteins and provides working models on how recognition is achieved at the molecular level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Schornack
- Institut für Genetik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 06099 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Skamnioti P, Ridout CJ. Microbial avirulence determinants: guided missiles or antigenic flak? MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2005; 6:551-559. [PMID: 20565679 DOI: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00302.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY Avirulence (avr) determinants are incompatibility factors which elicit host plant defence responses in a gene-for-gene manner. They are produced by fungi, bacteria and viruses, and their recognition by resistance genes has been extensively studied for decades. But why should a microbe keep a molecule that allows it to be recognized? One argument is that avr genes perform some essential function and must be kept despite giving the pathogen away. Many bacterial avr determinants have been shown to be effectors, which contribute to virulence and aggressiveness. If this were always the case, mutants lacking these essential molecules would be at a serious disadvantage. Some disadvantage has been shown for a small number, but for the majority there is no effect on virulence. This has been explained by functional redundancy for bacterial and fungal avr determinants, with other molecules compensating for the deletion of these essential genes. However, this argument is counter-intuitive because by definition these individual genes are no longer essential; so why keep them? With increasing numbers of avr genes being identified, efforts to elucidate their function are increasing. In this review, we take stock of the accumulating literature, and consider what the real function of avr determinants might be.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevi Skamnioti
- Department of Disease and Stress Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cawly J, Cole AB, Király L, Qiu W, Schoelz JE. The plant gene CCD1 selectively blocks cell death during the hypersensitive response to Cauliflower mosaic virus infection. MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS : MPMI 2005; 18:212-9. [PMID: 15782635 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-18-0212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The P6 protein of Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) W260 elicits a hypersensitive response (HR) on inoculated leaves of Nicotiana edwardsonii. This defense response, common to many plant pathogens, has two key characteristics, cell death within the initially infected tissues and restriction of the pathogen to this area. We present evidence that a plant gene designated CCD1, originally identified in N. bigelovii, can selectively block the cell death pathway during HR, whereas the resistance pathway against W260 remains intact. Suppression of cell death was evident not only macroscopically but also microscopically. The suppression of HR-mediated cell death was specific to CaMV, as Tobacco mosaic virus was able to elicit HR in the plants that contained CCD1. CCD1 also blocks the development of a systemic cell death symptom induced specifically by the P6 protein of W260 in N. clevelandii. Introgression of CCD1 from N. bigelovii into N. clevelandii blocked the development of systemic cell death in response to W260 infection but could not prevent systemic cell death induced by Tomato bushy stunt virus. Thus, CCD1 blocks both local and systemic cell death induced by P6 of W260 but does not act as a general suppressor of cell death induced by other plant viruses. Furthermore, experiments with CCD1 provide further evidence that cell death could be uncoupled from resistance in the HR of Nicotiana edwardsonii to CaMV W260.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Cawly
- Department of Plant Microbiology and Pathology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|