Activation-induced cytidine deaminase can target multiple topologies of double-stranded DNA in a transcription-independent manner

In search of an ideal template for therapeutic genome editing: A review of current developments for structure optimization

Gene therapy is a fast developing field of medicine with hundreds of ongoing early-stage clinical trials and numerous preclinical studies. Genome editing (GE) now is an increasingly important technology for achieving stable therapeutic effect in gene correction, with hematopoietic cells representing a key target cell population for developing novel treatments for a number of hereditary diseases, infections and cancer. By introducing a double strand break (DSB) in the defined locus of genomic DNA, GE tools allow to knockout the desired gene or to knock-in the therapeutic gene if provided with an appropriate repair template. Currently, the efficiency of methods for GE-mediated knock-in is limited. Significant efforts were focused on improving the parameters and interaction of GE nuclease proteins. However, emerging data suggests that optimal characteristics of repair templates may play an important role in the knock-in mechanisms. While viral vectors with notable example of AAVs as a donor template carrier remain the mainstay in many preclinical trials, non-viral templates, including plasmid and linear dsDNA, long ssDNA templates, single and double-stranded ODNs, represent a promising alternative. Furthermore, tuning of editing conditions for the chosen template as well as its structure, length, sequence optimization, homology arm (HA) modifications may have paramount importance for achieving highly efficient knock-in with favorable safety profile. This review outlines the current developments in optimization of templates for the GE mediated therapeutic gene correction.

Pan-cancer landscape of AID-related mutations, composite mutations, and their potential role in the ICI response

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase, AICDA or AID, is a driver of somatic hypermutation and class-switch recombination in immunoglobulins. In addition, this deaminase belonging to the APOBEC family may have off-target effects genome-wide, but its effects at pan-cancer level are not well elucidated. Here, we used different pan-cancer datasets, totaling more than 50,000 samples analyzed by whole-genome, whole-exome, or targeted sequencing. AID mutations are present at pan-cancer level with higher frequency in hematological cancers and higher presence at transcriptionally active TAD domains. AID synergizes initial hotspot mutations by a second composite mutation. AID mutational load was found to be independently associated with a favorable outcome in immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) treated patients across cancers after analyzing 2000 samples. Finally, we found that AID-related neoepitopes, resulting from mutations at more frequent hotspots if compared to other mutational signatures, enhance CXCL13/CCR5 expression, immunogenicity, and T-cell exhaustion, which may increase ICI sensitivity.

Activation induced cytidine deaminase: An old friend with new faces

Activation induced cytidine deaminase (AID) protein is a member of APOBEC family. AID converts cytidine to uracil, which is a key step for somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR). AID also plays critical roles in B cell precursor stages, removing polyreactive B cells from immune repertoire. Since the main function of AID is inducing point mutations, dysregulation can lead to increased mutation load, translocations, disturbed genomic integrity, and lymphomagenesis. As such, expression of AID as well as its function is controlled strictly at various molecular steps. Other members of the APOBEC family also play crucial roles during carcinogenesis. Considering all these functions, AID represents a bridge, linking chronic inflammation to carcinogenesis and immune deficiencies to autoimmune manifestations.

New Insights Into the Lineage-Specific Expansion and Functional Diversification of Lamprey AID/APOBEC Family

The AID/APOBEC family which converts cytidine to uridine on RNA or DNA experienced dynamic expansion in primates in order to resist exogenous viruses and endogenous retrotransposons. Recently, expansion of AID/APOBEC-like homologs has also been observed in the extant jawless vertebrate lamprey. To reveal what causes such expansion and leads to the functional diversification of lamprey cytosine deaminases (CDAs), we reassessed the CDA genes in Lethenteron japonicum (Lj). We first confirmed the expansion of LjCDA1L1 (CDA1-like 1) genes and found the expression correlation of LjCDA2 and LjCDA1L2 with LjVLRs (variable lymphocyte receptors). Among up to 14 LjCDA1L1 proteins, LjCDA1L1_4a has an extremely high deamination activity on ssDNA and buDNA and, unexpectedly, on dsDNA. LjCDA1L1s can also restrict the infection of HSV-1 particles. Thus, the arms race between the host and pathogens along with the recruitment by VLR assembly may participate together to form a driving force in the expansion and diversification of the lamprey AID/APOBEC family.

OUP accepted manuscript

Activation-induced deaminase (AID) is a DNA-cytosine deaminase that mediates maturation of antibodies through somatic hypermutation and class-switch recombination. While it causes mutations in immunoglobulin heavy and light chain genes and strand breaks in the switch regions of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene, it largely avoids causing such damage in the rest of the genome. To help understand targeting by human AID, we expressed it in repair-deficient Escherichia coli and mapped the created uracils in the genomic DNA using uracil pull-down and sequencing, UPD-seq. We found that both AID and the human APOBEC3A preferentially target tRNA genes and transcription start sites, but do not show preference for highly transcribed genes. Unlike A3A, AID did not show a strong replicative strand bias or a preference for hairpin loops. Overlapping uracilation peaks between these enzymes contained binding sites for a protein, FIS, that helps create topological domains in the E. coli genome. To confirm whether these findings were relevant to B cells, we examined mutations from lymphoma and leukemia genomes within AID-preferred sequences. These mutations also lacked replicative strand bias or a hairpin loop preference. We propose here a model for how AID avoids causing mutations in the single-stranded DNA found within replication forks.

The optimal pH of AID is skewed from that of its catalytic pocket by DNA-binding residues and surface charge

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) is a member of the apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC) family of cytidine deaminases. AID mutates immunoglobulin loci to initiate secondary antibody diversification. The APOBEC3 (A3) sub-branch mutates viral pathogens in the cytosol and acidic endosomal compartments. Accordingly, AID functions optimally near neutral pH, while most A3s are acid-adapted (optimal pH 5.5-6.5). To gain a structural understanding for this pH disparity, we constructed high-resolution maps of AID catalytic activity vs pH. We found AID's optimal pH was 7.3 but it retained most (>70%) of the activity at pH 8. Probing of ssDNA-binding residues near the catalytic pocket, key for bending ssDNA into the pocket (e.g R25) yielded mutants with altered pH preference, corroborating previous findings that the equivalent residue in APOBEC3G (H216) underlies its acidic pH preference. AID from bony fish exhibited more basic optimal pH (pH 7.5-8.1) and several R25-equivalent mutants altered pH preference. Comparison of pH optima across the AID/APOBEC3 family revealed an inverse correlation between positive surface charge and overall catalysis.  The paralogue with the most robust catalytic activity (APOBEC3A) has the lowest surface charge, most acidic pH preference, while the paralogue with the most lethargic catalytic rate (AID) has the most positive surface charge and highest optimal pH. We suggest one possible mechanism is through surface charge dictating an overall optimal pH that is different from the optimal pH of the catalytic pocket microenvironment. These findings illuminate an additional structural mechanism that regulates AID/APOBEC3 mutagenesis.

Structure-Based Design of First-Generation Small Molecule Inhibitors Targeting the Catalytic Pockets of AID, APOBEC3A, and APOBEC3B

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) initiates antibody diversification by mutating immunoglobulin loci in B lymphocytes. AID and related APOBEC3 (A3) enzymes also induce genome-wide mutations and lesions implicated in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. The most prevalent mutation signatures across diverse tumor genomes are attributable to the mistargeted mutagenic activities of AID/A3s. Thus, inhibiting AID/A3s has been suggested to be of therapeutic benefit. We previously used a computational-biochemical approach to gain insight into the structure of AID’s catalytic pocket, which resulted in the discovery of a novel type of regulatory catalytic pocket closure that regulates AID/A3s that we termed the “Schrodinger’s CATalytic pocket”. Our findings were subsequently confirmed by direct structural studies. Here, we describe our search for small molecules that target the catalytic pocket of AID. We identified small molecules that inhibit purified AID, AID in cell extracts, and endogenous AID of lymphoma cells. Analogue expansion yielded derivatives with improved potencies. These were found to also inhibit A3A and A3B, the two most tumorigenic siblings of AID. Two compounds exhibit low micromolar IC₅₀ inhibition of AID and A3A, exhibiting the strongest potency for A3A. Docking suggests key interactions between their warheads and residues lining the catalytic pockets of AID, A3A, and A3B and between the tails and DNA-interacting residues on the surface proximal to the catalytic pocket opening. Accordingly, mutants of these residues decreased inhibition potency. The chemistry and abundance of key stabilizing interactions between the small molecules and residues within and immediately outside the catalytic pockets are promising for therapeutic development.

Evolutionary Comparative Analyses of DNA-Editing Enzymes of the Immune System: From 5-Dimensional Description of Protein Structures to Immunological Insights and Applications to Protein Engineering

The immune system is unique among all biological sub-systems in its usage of DNA-editing enzymes to introduce targeted gene mutations and double-strand DNA breaks to diversify antigen receptor genes and combat viral infections. These processes, initiated by specific DNA-editing enzymes, often result in mistargeted induction of genome lesions that initiate and drive cancers. Like other molecules involved in human health and disease, the DNA-editing enzymes of the immune system have been intensively studied in humans and mice, with little attention paid (< 1% of published studies) to the same enzymes in evolutionarily distant species. Here, we present a systematic review of the literature on the characterization of one such DNA-editing enzyme, activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), from an evolutionary comparative perspective. The central thesis of this review is that although the evolutionary comparative approach represents a minuscule fraction of published works on this and other DNA-editing enzymes, this approach has made significant impacts across the fields of structural biology, immunology, and cancer research. Using AID as an example, we highlight the value of the evolutionary comparative approach in discoveries already made, and in the context of emerging directions in immunology and protein engineering. We introduce the concept of 5-dimensional (5D) description of protein structures, a more nuanced view of a structure that is made possible by evolutionary comparative studies. In this higher dimensional view of a protein's structure, the classical 3-dimensional (3D) structure is integrated in the context of real-time conformations and evolutionary time shifts (4^th dimension) and the relevance of these dynamics to its biological function (5^th dimension).

Predicting clinical outcomes using cancer progression associated signatures

Somatic mutation signatures are an informative facet of cancer aetiology, however they are rarely useful for predicting patient outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of a panel of 142 mutation-signature–associated metrics (P142) for predicting cancer progression in patients from a ‘TCGA PanCancer Atlas’ cohort. The P142 metrics are comprised of AID/APOBEC and ADAR deaminase associated SNVs analyzed for codon context, strand bias, and transitions/transversions. TCGA tumor-normal mutation data was obtained for 10,437 patients, representing 31 of the most prevalent forms of cancer. Stratified random sampling was used to split patients into training, tuning and validation cohorts for each cancer type. Cancer specific machine learning (XGBoost) models were built using the output from the P142 panel to predict patient Progression Free Survival (PFS) status as either “High PFS” or “Low PFS”. Predictive performance of each model was evaluated using the validation cohort. Models accurately predicted PFS status for several cancer types, including adrenocortical carcinoma, glioma, mesothelioma, and sarcoma. In conclusion, the P142 panel of metrics successfully predicted cancer progression status in patients with some, but not all cancer types analyzed. These results pave the way for future studies on cancer progression associated signatures.

Structural plasticity of substrate selection by activation-induced cytidine deaminase as a regulator of its genome-wide mutagenic activity

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) mediates somatic hypermutation and class-switch recombination of antibodies. Computational-biochemical and crystallography analyses of AID have identified three surface grooves for binding single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Functional studies have also found evidence for RNA-binding motifs on AID. Although AID and the related apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC) enzymes share a conserved core, AID uniquely features multiple substrate-binding motifs on its surface. Here we suggest that combinatorial deployment of AID's multiple ssDNA- or RNA-binding motifs yields many substrate-binding modes that can accommodate ssDNA, RNA, or DNA/RNA substrates of diverse structures. We also suggest that AID oligomerization generates yet additional novel substrate-binding modes. We propose that this plasticity in substrate choice is an evolved aspect of AID's structure that contributes to the regulation of its differential mutagenic activity at various loci.