Effect of a prior portasystemic shunt on subsequent liver transplantation

Understanding Local Hemodynamic Changes After Liver Transplant: Different Entities or Simply Different Sides to the Same Coin?

Liver transplantation is an extremely complex procedure performed in an extremely complex patient. With a successful technique and acceptable long-term survival, a new challenge arose: overcoming donor shortage. Thus, living donor liver transplant and other techniques were developed. Aiming for donor safety, many liver transplant units attempted to push the viable limits in terms of size, retrieving smaller and smaller grafts for adult recipients. With these smaller grafts came numerous problems, concepts, and definitions. The spotlight is now aimed at the mirage of hemodynamic changes derived from the recipients prior alterations. This article focuses on the numerous hemodynamic syndromes, their definitions, causes, and management and interconnection with each other. The aim is to aid the physician in their recognition and treatment to improve liver transplantation success.

Management of spontaneous portosystemic shunts at the time of liver transplantation: treatment or observation? Results of a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) during liver transplantation (LT) remains debated. We systematically reviewed the literature on definitions, treatment and outcomes of patients presenting SPSS undergoing LT.

METHODS

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we used PubMed to retrieve all studies dealing with SPSS and LT between January 1987 and January 2020. The primary endpoints were definitions and outcomes according to the management of SPSS (treatment vs observation).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies detailing the management of 962 SPSS were retrieved. Hemodynamically significant SPSS were defined as those having diameter ≥ 10 mm in 41% (n = 395) of patients. SPSS were splenorenal (42%), cavo-gastric (15.2%), umbilical (7.4%), mesenterico-caval (n = 31; 3.2%), mesenterico-renal (0.1%) and unreported (31.9%), respectively. At the time of LT 372 shunts (38.7%) were treated while 590 were observed (61.3%). During a follow-up time ranging from 4 months to 5 years, the reported overall survival (OS) at 1 year was not significantly different except for one study. Portal vein anastomosis complications (i.e. reduced flow, stenosis or thrombosis) were similarly reported in observed [n = 26 (4%)] and ligated SPSS [n = 10 (2%)] (p = 0.22) but the rate of relaparotomy was significantly higher in observed SPPS (16 vs 2; p = 0.01) to rescue post LT portal vein thrombosis (n = 6) and reduced portal flow and graft dysfunction (n = 10).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a heterogeneous management of SPSS during LT in the literature. Ligation of SPPS did not reduce vascular complications neither improved survival. A randomized prospective study might contribute to identify best management of SPSS at time of LT.

[Portal perfusion with right gastroepiploic vein flow in liver transplant]

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation in patients with liver cirrhosis, portal vein thrombosis, and cavernous transformation of the portal vein, is a complex procedure with high possibility of liver graft dysfunction. It is performed in 2-19% of all liver transplants, and has a significantly high mortality rate in the post-operative period. Other procedures to maintain portal perfusion have been described, however there are no reports of liver graft perfusion using right gastroepiploic vein.

CLINICAL CASE

A 20 year-old female diagnosed with cryptogenic cirrhosis, with a Child-Pugh score of 7 points (class "B"), and MELD score of 14 points, with thrombosis and cavernous transformation of the portal vein, severe portal hypertension, splenomegaly, a history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to oesophageal varices, and left renal agenesis. The preoperative evaluation for liver transplantation was completed, and the right gastroepiploic vein of 1-cm diameter was observed draining to the infrahepatic inferior vena cava and right suprarenal vein. An orthotopic liver transplantation was performed from a non-living donor (deceased on January 30, 2005) using the Piggy-Back technique. Portal vein perfusion was maintained using the right gastroepiploic vein, and the outcome was satisfactory. The patient was discharged 13 days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation was performed satisfactorily, obtaining an acceptable outcome. In this case, the portal perfusion had adequate blood flow through the right gastroepiploic vein.

A central approach to splenorenal shunt in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

The management of LSRS is a crucial problem to ensure a sufficient PV flow during pediatric LT. Although several techniques have been indicated to solve this problem, a more appropriate approach to LSRS is still needed in pediatric LT. We herein present a modified surgical approach to the ligation of LSRS via the left side of the IVC for a nine-month-old boy with severe portal hypertension and a history of Kasai portoenterostomy. LSRS was identified and exposed through the left side of the IVC and the dorsal surface of the pancreas from the superior side of the body of the pancreas. The post-operative course was uneventful with an excellent PV flow. The central approach for the ligation of LSRS is worth considering as an alternative procedure for a patient with collateral vessels and a history of multiple laparotomies.

Assessment of surgical portosystemic shunts and associated complications: The diagnostic and therapeutic role of radiologists

Surgical portosystemic shunting, the formation of a vascular connection between the portal and systemic venous circulation, has been used as a treatment to reduce portal venous pressure. Although the use of portosystemic shunt surgery in the management of portal hypertension has declined during the past decade in favour of alternative therapies, and subsequently surgeons and radiologists became less familiar with the procedure, it remains a well-established treatment. Knowledge of different types of surgical portosystemic shunts, their pathophysiology and complications will help radiologists improve communication with surgeons and enhance their understanding of the diagnostic and therapeutic role of radiology in the assessment and management of these shunts. Optimal assessment of the shunt is essential to determine its patency and allow timely intervention. Both non-invasive and invasive imaging modalities complement each other in the evaluation of surgical portosystemic shunts. Interventional radiology plays an important role in the management of complications, such as shunt thrombosis and stenosis. This article describes the various types of surgical portosystemic shunts, explains the anatomy and pathophysiology of these shunts, illustrates the pearls and pitfalls of different imaging modalities in the assessment of these shunts and demonstrates the role of radiologists in the interventional management of complications.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt before and after Liver Transplantation

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has long been referred to as a procedure performed as "a bridge to transplantation" since, like many other portosystemic shunts, it decompresses the portal circulation and stabilizes patients but does not definitively treat portal hypertension. One of the major advantages of TIPS over surgically placed portosystemic shunts in the transplant era is that the TIPS is intrahepatic and is removed in situ with the native liver, and usually does not need additional surgery (unlike takedown/ligation of surgical shunts). There are several studies that evaluate TIPS before transplantation-not as a bridge/temporizing measure, but as a prelude to the transplant to decompress the portal circulation and reduce portosystemic engorgement and collaterals and thus, in theory, reduce intraoperative bleeding during liver transplantation. However, these studies, mostly in the transplant literature, have been equivocal from an intraoperative and posttransplant clinical outcome standpoint. TIPS creation in liver transplant recipients is another interesting aspect of TIPS. There has been a debate about whether or not liver transplantation adds additional technical difficulty to the TIPS procedure. Initially, many theories were proposed as to the technical difficulty of TIPS in a transplanted liver. However, recent opinions and published studies demonstrate that whole-graft liver transplantation does not pose a significant technical difficulty to TIPS. Moreover, there are several recent studies evaluating the outcomes of TIPS in liver transplant recipients, showing that outcomes are less favorable when compared with TIPS in nontransplanted patients. This article discusses the results of TIPS as a preoperative prelude to liver transplantation. In addition, it discusses the technical and clinical outcomes of TIPS in liver transplant recipients.

Surgical management of portal hypertension in children

The management of children with portal hypertension has dramatically changed during the past decade, with an improvement in outcome. This has been achieved by improved efficiency of endoscopic variceal control and the success of liver transplantation. Emergency surgical shunt procedures are rarely required, with acute bleeding episodes generally controlled endoscopically or, occasionally in adults, by interventional radiological procedures. Portosystemic shunts may be considered as a bridge to transplant in adults but are rarely used in this context in children. Nontransplant surgery or radiological interventions may still be indicated for noncirrhotic portal hypertension when the primary cause can be cured and to allow normalization of portal pressure before liver parenchyma is damaged by chronic secondary changes in some specific diseases. The meso-Rex bypass shunt is used widely but is limited to those with a favorable anatomy and can even be performed preemptively. Elective portosystemic shunt surgery is reserved for failure to respond to conservative management in the absence of alternative therapies.

Surgery for portal hypertension in children

Management of children with portal hypertension has evolved considerably over the past decades. Development of physiologic shunts (meso-Rex bypass) and successful liver transplant has changed the paradigm of portal hypertension surgery. Children with pre-hepatic portal hypertension are investigated and, if suitable, candidates are offered the mesenteric-to-left portal vein bypass (meso-Rex) preemptively, before development of symptoms of portal hypertension. Aggressive medical management, endoscopic ligation of bleeding varices, and radiologically placed intrahepatic stents have greatly reduced the need for emergent surgical procedures. A larger number of surgical options offer a permanent solution for children with portal hypertension in the setting of well-compensated liver function. Portal hypertension in the setting of decompensated liver disease is managed medically (via endoscopy) or radiologically (via transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) with the aim to offer liver transplant as a permanent solution.

Liver transplantation in a randomized controlled trial of emergency treatment of acutely bleeding esophageal varices in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Bleeding esophageal varices (BEV) in cirrhosis has been considered an indication for liver transplantation (LT). This issue was examined in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of unselected, consecutive patients with advanced cirrhosis and BEV that compared endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST; n = 106) to emergency direct portacaval shunt (EPCS; n = 105).

METHODS

Diagnostic work-up and treatment were initiated within 8 hours. Patients were evaluated for LT on admission and repeatedly thereafter; 96% underwent over 10 years of regular follow-up. The analysis was supplemented by 1300 unrandomized cirrhotic patients who previously underwent portacaval shunt (PCS) with 100% follow-up.

RESULTS

In the RCT long-term bleeding control was 100% following EPCS, only 20% following EST. Also, 3-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 75%, 73%, 46%, and 46%, respectively, following EPCS compared with 44%, 21%, 9%, and 9% following EST, respectively (P < .001). Only 13 RCT patients (6%) were ultimately referred for LT mainly because of progressive liver failure; only 7 (3%) were approved for LT and only 4 (2%) underwent LT. The 1- and 5-year LT survival rates were 0.68% and 0, respectively, compared with 81% and 73%, respectively, after EPCS. In the 1300 unrandomized PCS patients, 50 (3.8%) were referred and 19 (1.5%) underwent LT. The 5-year survival rate was 53% compared with 72% for all 1300 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

If bleeding is permanently controlled, as occurred invariably following EPCS, cirrhotic patients with BEV seldom require LT. PCS is effective first-line and long-term treatment. Should LT be required in patients with PCS, although technically more demanding, numerous studies have shown that PCS does not increase mortality or complications. EST is not effective emergency or long-term therapy.

Liver transplantation in the presence of old portal vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has been mentioned as a potential obstacle to liver transplantation (LTx).

OBJECTIVE

To review the impact of PVT on orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) outcome.

METHOD

Between January 2006 and April 2009, 440 OLT were performed in Shiraz Transplant Unit of whom, 35 (7.9%) cases had old PVT with recanalization. Data were retrospectively collected regarding the demographics, indication for OLT, Child-Turgot-Pugh classification, pre-transplant diagnosis of PVT, perioperative course and managements, relapse of PVT, early post-operative mortality and morbidity. All patients received liver from deceased donors, underwent thrombendvenectomy with end-to-end anastomosis without interposition graft and evaluated daily for 5 days and thereafter, biweekly by duplex sonography during the follow-up period for 2 months. They were treated by therapeutic doses of heparin followed by warfarin to maintain an INR of 2-2.5.

RESULTS

The causes of end-stage liver disease were hepatitis B in 11, cryptogenic cirrhosis in 11, primary sclerosing cholangitis in 5 and other causes in 8 recipients. Extension of thrombosis was through confluence of superior mesenteric and splenic vein in 32 and to superior mesenteric vein in 3 patients. The mean±SD operation time was 7.2±1.5 hrs. The mean±SD transfusion requirement was 5.4±2.8 units of packed cells. The mean±SD duration of hospital stay in these patients was 17.7±10.9 days. Eight patients died; 1 developed early in-hospital PVT, 1 had hepatic vein thrombosis, and 1 died of in-hospital ischemic cerebrovascular accident, despite a full anticoagulant therapy. The mean±SD follow-up period for those 28 patients discharged from hospital was 16.6±7.9 months; none of them developed relapse of PVT. The overall mortality and morbidity was 28% and 32%, respectively. There was no relapse of PVT in the other patients.

CONCLUSION

The presence of PVT at the time of OLT is not a contraindication for the operation but those with PVT have a more difficult surgery, develop more postoperative complications, and experience a higher in-hospital mortality.

Diagnostic and interventional radiology for Budd-Chiari syndrome

Budd-Chiari syndrome is a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by hepatic venous outflow obstruction that involves one or more draining hepatic veins. Its occurrence in populations in the western hemisphere is commonly associated with hypercoagulative states. Clinical manifestations in many cases are nonspecific, and imaging may be critical for early diagnosis of venous obstruction and accurate assessment of the extent of disease. If Budd-Chiari syndrome is not treated promptly and appropriately, the outcome may be dismal. Comprehensive imaging evaluations, in combination with pathologic analyses and clinical testing, are essential for determining the severity of disease, stratifying risk, selecting the appropriate therapy, and objectively assessing the response. The main goal of treatment is to alleviate hepatic congestion, thereby improving hepatocyte function and allowing resolution of portal hypertension. Various medical, endovascular, and surgical treatment options are available. Percutaneous and endovascular procedures, when performed in properly selected patients, may be more effective than medical treatment methods for preserving liver function and arresting disease progression in the long term. In addition, such procedures are associated with lower morbidity and mortality than are open surgical techniques.

Budd-Chiari syndrome: illustrated review of current management

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is characterized by hepatic venous outflow obstruction at any level from the small hepatic veins to the atriocaval junction. BCS is a complex disease with a wide spectrum of aetiologies and presentations. This article reviews the current literature with respect to presentation, management and prognosis of the disease. Medical, interventional and surgical management of BCS is discussed. Particular attention is paid to interventional and surgical aspects of management. The review is augmented by images, which provide a clinical corollary to the text.

The outcome of living donor liver transplantation with prior spontaneous large portasystemic shunts

We investigated the outcome of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with prior spontaneous large portasystemic shunts. Thirty-three patients of 155 patients (21.2%) undergoing LDLT had spontaneous large portasystemic shunts. Portal venous hemodynamics, surgical procedures for shunts, and morbidity and mortality rates were investigated in three types of shunts: splenorenal shunt (SRS group; n = 11), shunt derived from coronary vein (CVS group; n = 6) and umbilical vein shunt (UVS group; n = 15). The two groups of patients (SRS/CVS) received prophylactic surgical repair of shunts during LDLT except for one patient in the SRS group. The flow direction of main portal vein and grade of steal of superior mesenteric vein flow by shunt were significantly different among three groups. No significant differences were observed among three groups in operative parameters, hospitalization and morbidity except for postoperative portal complication. There was no significant difference in the actuarial survival rate among three groups of SRS, CVS and UVS (81.8% vs. 83.3% vs. 86.6% at 1 year respectively). In the SRS group, two patients had postoperative steal of graft portal venous flow by residual SRS that needed further treatment. The outcome of LDLT with prior spontaneous large portasystemic shunts is satisfactory, despite the complexity of the transplant procedures.

Management of Budd-Chiari syndrome

1. Medical therapy alone is rarely sufficient for long-term management of patients with hepatic vein thrombosis. 2. Enthusiasm for intravascular stents (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [TIPS] or vena caval stents) for the management of Budd-Chiari syndrome must be tempered by the limited interval of expected utility, the likelihood of stent occlusion/revisions, and the potential complications that stent migration would impose upon a subsequent liver transplant. 3. Both decompressive shunts and liver transplantation provide excellent long-term survival for patients with the Budd-Chiari syndrome. The determination of which surgical procedure is most appropriate is aided by assessment of the etiology of hepatic vein thrombosis, hepatic reserve, liver histology, and splanchnic venous anatomy. 4. Progressive hepatic damage may develop in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome who have patent surgical shunts or TIPS. Lifelong follow-up and tracking of hepatic function are indicated. Some patients with shunts will require salvage with liver transplantation. 5. Long-term anticoagulation should be considered after transplantation, even in patients who do not have an identifiable coagulation disorder.

Elective Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation for Portal Decompression in the Immediate Pretransplantation Period in Adult Living Related Liver Transplant Recipient Candidates: Preliminary Results

PURPOSE

To evaluate (i) the efficacy of purposeful creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) before transplantation to optimize potential living related liver transplantation (LRLTx) and (ii) the efficacy of TIPS creation in this setting in reducing perioperative resource utilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review was performed of the records of patients who underwent adult LRLTx with or without preoperative TIPS creation from October 2003 through April 2005. Patients were evaluated for preoperative parameters (Child-Pugh class, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score, and coagulation parameters), intraoperative parameters (blood transfusion requirements and operative time), and postoperative parameters (intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and 30-day repeat operation and mortality rates). Comparison between the two treatment groups was made with the Mann-Whitney U test. Within the TIPS group, comparison of blood transfusion requirements was performed by one-way analysis of variance based on the degree of portosystemic gradient reduction after TIPS creation.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were included in the TIPS group, and 12 patients were included in the group without TIPS. Median time between TIPS and transplantation was 2 days. There was no statistical difference in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters between groups except for the APACHE II score (P<.002), which was higher in the TIPS group. Despite this, the outcome and postoperative hospital resource utilization were similar between groups. Intraoperative blood transfusion based on the degree of portosystemic gradient reduction after TIPS creation was not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Newly created TIPS do not interfere with the intraoperative technical and perioperative clinical aspects of adult LRLTx. Preoperative TIPS creation before transplantation may reduce the postoperative morbidity and mortality seen in liver transplant recipients who have a greater APACHE II score at the outset of treatment.

Results of liver transplantation in patients with previous portosystemic shunts

INTRODUCTION

Although liver transplantation is performed successfully in some patients with previous portosystemic shunts (PSS), these surgical procedures have been considered a relative contraindication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We aimed to determine whether a previous PSS worsens the prognosis of patients who undergo OLT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 1986 and October 2003, 520 liver transplants were performed in 467 patients in our center. Thirteen patients had undergone a PSS before OLT. The types of PSS were: portocaval (n = 8), splenorenal (n = 3), mesocaval (n = 1), and portoatrial (n = 1). We compared patients with previous PSS (cases) and the three patients with an OLT immediately before each case (controls). We analyzed the following variables: age, Child-Pugh stage, pretransplant liver disease, surgical times, transfusion requirements, infections, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative evolution, and survival.

RESULTS

Age, Child-Pugh stage, and pretransplant liver disease were similar in both groups. There were no statistical differences in age, surgical times, ischemia time, anhepatic phase, transfusion requirements, ICU stay, infections, or hospital stay. The postoperative course was similar in both groups. Long-term survival was 84.62% in cases versus 78.5% in controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous PSS should not be considered a contraindication for liver transplantation, even though this group of patients involves a special surgical challenge.

Eversion thrombectomy for portal vein thrombosis during liver transplantation

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has been seen as an obstacle to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), but recent data suggest that favorable results may be achieved in this group of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, management, and survival of patients with PVT undergoing primary OLT with thrombectomy. Between October 1990 and August 2000, 468 liver transplantations were performed in our center and portal vein thrombosis was present in 38 patients (8.1%). Preoperative diagnosis, extension, intraoperative management, postoperative recurrence of portal vein thrombosis, and 1-year actuarial survival rates were retrospectively studied. Preoperative diagnosis was made in 17 cases (44.7%). In all patients, portal flow was restored after portal vein thrombectomy, followed by usual end-to-end portal anastomosis. All patients received preventive low-weight heparin from day 2 to hospital discharge, and then aspirin. Rethrombosis was observed in one patient with extended splanchnic thrombus. The 1-year actuarial patient survival rate was 83.7%, and did not significantly differ from the patients without portal vein thrombosis (86.7%). Our results suggest that portal vein thrombosis is often partial and thus difficult to diagnose preoperatively: it can be managed successfully during surgery by thrombectomy, except when there is complete splanchnic veins thrombosis; and it did not affect 1-year survival.

Liver transplantation in cystic fibrosis

Liver disease is the second most common cause of death in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Improvement in surgical techniques, medical management, and imaging modalities has broadened the range of options for treatment of these patients. Medical management with ursodeoxycholic acid and nutritional support may help decelerate the progression of liver disease. A timely evaluation of CF patients with liver involvement for transplantation is important. Such evaluation should not be delayed until signs of hepatic decompensation occur. Combined lung-liver transplant can be considered for patients with advanced pulmonary disease. Pretransplant management of portal hypertension with a portosystemic shunt procedure is an option for patients with well-preserved synthetic liver function. Improvement in lung function after liver transplantation and no significant risk of pulmonary infection with immunosuppressive therapy have been reported. Review of individual center experiences have shown satisfactory survival and improved quality of life for CF patients undergoing liver transplant.

Portal venous thrombosis or sclerosis in liver transplantation candidates: preoperative CT findings and correlation with surgical procedure

PURPOSE

To review computed tomographic (CT) findings in patients with surgically proved portal venous (PV) thrombosis or sclerosis and to correlate these findings with the surgical procedure used at orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 379 OLTs, PV thrombosis or sclerosis was found at surgery in 39 patients (10.3%). Before OLT, surgical records and CT images were retrospectively reviewed in 35 patients with available CT studies. Diameter of the extrahepatic PV and patency of the PV system were evaluated. Cavernous transformation, calcifications of the venous wall or thrombus, lesions suggestive of tumor, mesenteric varices, edema, or splenorenal shunt were recorded. A nonpaired Student t test and the Fisher exact test were used to analyze the results.

RESULTS

Of 35 patients, 23 (66%) underwent thrombectomy with direct PV-to-PV anastomosis and 12 (34%) had placement of venous grafts or other anastomoses. The extrahepatic PV was 8.2 mm, but it significantly (P < or = .05) decreased in patients with splenorenal shunt. In 30 patients, CT depicted thrombosis, PV calcification, or other abnormalities. The thrombus extended to or beyond the confluence of the splenic and superior mesenteric veins in 21 (60%) and 11 (31%) patients, respectively. Eleven patients (31%) had cavernous transformation of the PV; eight (23%), a cordlike sclerotic PV; 19 (54%), a splenorenal shunt; 11 (31%), PV calcification; 17 (49%), mesenteric edema; 14 (40%), mesenteric varices. Patients with a cordlike or calcified PV were significantly (P < or = .05) more likely to require modification of the surgical technique.

CONCLUSION

Before OLT, CT can aid in assessment of PV and associated findings and in surgical management.

Budd-Chiari syndrome: current management options

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes of current treatment strategies for Budd-Chiari syndrome.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Budd-Chiari syndrome, occlusion or obstruction of hepatic venous outflow, is a disease traditionally managed by portal or mesenteric-systemic shunting. The development of other treatment options, such as catheter-directed thrombolysis, transjugular portosystemic shunting (TIPS), and liver transplantation, has expanded the therapeutic algorithm.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the medical records of all patients diagnosed with Budd-Chiari syndrome at the Johns Hopkins Hospital during the past 20 years.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients were identified: 13 (24%) male patients and 41 (76%) female patients, ranging in age from 2 to 76 years (median 33 years). Twenty-one (39%) had polycythemia vera, 3 (5.6%) used estrogens, 11 (20%) had a myeloproliferative or coagulation disorder, and in 7 (13%) the cause remained unknown. Forty-three patients were treated with surgical shunting, 24 mesocaval and 19 mesoatrial. Actuarial survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years after shunting were 83%, 78%, and 75%, respectively. Of 33 patients surviving more than 4 years, 28 (85%) had relief of clinical symptoms. Five patients required shunt revision and eight had radiologic procedures to maintain shunt patency. Primary and secondary shunt patency rates were 46% and 69% respectively for mesoatrial shunts and 70% and 85% respectively for mesocaval shunts. Clot lysis was successful as primary treatment in seven patients. TIPS was performed in three patients, one after a failed mesocaval shunt. During an average of 4 years of follow-up, these patients required multiple procedures to maintain TIPS patency. Six patients underwent liver transplantation. Of these, three had previous shunt procedures. Five of the transplant recipients are alive with follow-up of 2 to 9 years (median 6).

CONCLUSIONS

Both shunting and transplantation can result in a 5-year survival rate of at least 75%, and other treatment modalities may be appropriate for highly selected patients. Optimal management requires that treatment be directed by the predominant clinical symptom (liver failure or portal hypertension) and anatomical considerations and be tempered by careful assessment of surgical risk.

Surgical treatment of portal hypertension

The surgical treatment of portal hypertension has laxed and waned over the past century. Decompressive shunts for variceal bleeding hit their peak in the 1970s, but dissatisfaction with encephalopathy and liver failure led to further developments with selective shunts and devascularization procedures in the 1970s and early 1980s. Liver transplant is the major operative intervention currently in use and of advantage to patients with portal hypertension. The role of the surgeon is as part of the team involved in the full evaluation of patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension with its complications. The current repertoire of surgical options includes decompressive shunts, either total, partial or selective, devascularization procedures and liver transplantation. These options must be fitted into the overall management schema of pharmacologic and endoscopic therapy as the first-line approaches to managing these patients.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for Budd-Chiari syndrome or portal vein thrombosis: review of indications and problems

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients who present with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) or Budd-Chiari Syndrome (BCS).

METHODS

Nine patients with recent PVT and four patients with BCS underwent TIPS. The diagnosis was confirmed by color Doppler ultrasound and by angiogram in most patients. Patients were followed clinically and had TIPS checked periodically for patency. The end point was mortality, subsequent surgical shunting or orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

RESULTS

TIPS was placed in 13 of 15 (87%) patients with BCS or PVT. The mean decrease in pressure gradient was 56%. Median and mean follow-up were 14 months and 16.9 months. Procedure related complications occurred in two of 13 (15%), both in the PVT group. Direct procedural mortality was one of 13 (8%). The majority of patients with PVT (five of eight) underwent OLT. Of the remaining three, one patient subsequently developed a cavernous transformation of portal vein but is stable, one patient is stable, without further variceal bleeding, and one patient died because of multiple organ failure. In patients with BCS, three of four (75%) did well with TIPS, but one patient required immediate surgical shunting after occlusion of the TIPS. Two patients underwent OLT and the fourth patient is stable 2 yr later but has cirrhosis on biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with BCS, TIPS placement is effective and can be used as a bridge to liver transplantation. TIPS in the noncavernous PVT group should only be recommended when cirrhosis and uncontrollable variceal bleeding are present.

The role of portosystemic shunting in children in the transplant era

PURPOSE

Variceal bleeding in children generally presents in the setting of cirrhosis but may also occur in the absence of liver disease and after successful liver transplantation. The authors reviewed their experience with portosystemic shunting in children to better define its efficacy in sclerotherapy failures, as primary therapy, and its role before and after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Between 1983 and 1997, 21 children with recurrent variceal bleeding underwent portosystemic shunting at the authors' institution. Patients were divided into two groups: 13 patients in group I presented with intrinsic liver disease (cirrhosis) as a cause for portal hypertension; eight patients in group II with no liver disease had extrahepatic portal venous thrombosis, five of which occured after successful liver transplantation. The mean age was 8.6 years (range, 3 to 18). Shunt procedures were semielective, and were performed successfully in all children without any operative morbidity or mortality. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 15 years.

RESULTS

Shunt procedures included splenorenal (n = 15), splenocaval (n = 1), side-to-side splenorenal (n = 1), inferior mesenteric vein to renal vein (n = 1), mesocaval (n = 1), and transcutaneous intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS; n = 2). All patients in group II are alive and well with no further bleeding or occlusions. Of the 13 patients in group I, three had bleeding postshunt, and three patients went on to require liver transplantation because of worsening liver disease. One child died of liver failure with encephalopathy 4 years after shunting. There were two shunt occlusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Portosystemic shunting is effective therapy in patients with intrinsic liver disease, with salvage amenable by liver transplantation in the treatment failures. It is definitive therapy in patients with extrahepatic venous thrombosis.

Shunt surgery during the era of liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The indications for and the results of portosystemic shunts done in the authors' institution since initiation of a liver transplant program 10 years ago were reviewed.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

With the widespread availability of liver transplantation as definitive treatment of chronic liver disease, the role of shunts in the overall management of variceal bleeding needs to be redefined.

METHODS

Seventy-one variceal bleeders with cirrhosis who received a shunt (82% distal splenorenal shunts) because of sclerotherapy failure or because endoscopic treatment was not indicated were reviewed retrospectively. In 44 patients with well-preserved hepatic reserve, the shunt was used as a long-term bridge to transplantation (shunt group 1). The remaining 27 patients with shunts were not transplant candidates mainly because of uncontrolled alcoholism or advanced age (shunt group 2). Survival of both shunt groups was compared to that of 180 adult patients with a history of variceal bleeding who underwent transplantation soon after referral.

RESULTS

Because of their more advanced liver disease, the liver transplant group had a higher operative mortality rate (19%) than did either of the shunt groups (5% and 7%, respectively) (p < 0.02). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed better survival in shunt group 1 (seven patients thus far transplanted) than in either the liver transplant group or shunt group 2 during the early years and superior survival of shunt group 1 and the liver transplant group as compared to shunt group 2 during the later years of the analysis. Only two patients from shunt group 1 have died of late postoperative hepatic failure without benefit of liver transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

A shunt may serve as an excellent long-term bridge to liver transplantation in patients with well-preserved hepatic reserve. Shunt surgery still plays an important role in treatment of selected patients with variceal bleeding who are not present or future transplant candidates.

The role of liver transplantation in the management of portal hypertension

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for end stage liver disease and not a treatment specifically for portal hypertension. A patient with complications of portal hypertension must be evaluated for the presence, etiology, and severity of liver disease to determine the most appropriate therapy. In a Child's Class A patient, who would not be a liver transplant candidate for two to three years, surgical shunts may be indicated. Shunt surgery, however, does not address the underlying liver disease. Liver transplantation is reserved for the patient with complications of cirrhosis (such as ascites, encephalopathy, malnutrition, intractable pruritus, and variceal hemorrhage) for whom no other form of therapy exists.

A controlled analysis of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in liver transplant recipients. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Liver Transplantation Database

BACKGROUND

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an important treatment for complications of portal hypertension. As some authors have suggested that TIPS may facilitate liver transplantation technically, the objective of this study was to determine the impact of TIPS on the liver transplant operation and its outcome.

METHODS

The analysis was designed as a retrospective cohort study using a multicenter database. Fifty-five patients with TIPS were matched with 55 controls on the basis of 10 pretransplant laboratory, clinical, and demographic features. TIPS patients and control patients were compared with regard to duration of surgery, intraoperative blood product usage, liver and renal function, volume of ascites, survival, and hospital stay. For confirmatory purposes, a parallel analysis using linear regression methods was performed.

RESULTS

By matched analysis, TIPS patients had less ascites at surgery (mean 0.9+/-0.20 vs. 2.2+/-0.37 L, P=0.005) and a slightly shorter time from incision to cross-clamp (mean 2.1+/-0.10 vs. 2.5+/-0.15 hr, P=0.03). However, there were not significant differences for total operative time (mean 6.0+/-0.17 vs. 6.3+/-0.25 hr, P=1.00), blood product usage, or any other outcome variable. Regression analysis confirmed these results.

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS does not significantly impact the course of liver transplantation surgery. Therefore, preoperative portal decompression solely to facilitate liver transplantation is not an appropriate indication for TIPS.

Radiological intervention in Budd-Chiari syndrome: techniques and outcome in 18 patients

We reviewed our experience of the therapeutic role of radiology in Budd-Chiari syndrome. Patients with stenosis and/or occlusion of the main hepatic veins and/or inferior vena cava (IVC) are suitable for radiological intervention (35% in our series). Eighteen patients (mean age 37.4 years) have undergone radiological intervention over the past 8 years. The site of obstruction was the hepatic veins in 12/18 patients while 6/18 patients had both hepatic vein and IVC obstruction, which in two was due to tumour thrombus. One patient had repeated dilatations of a mesocaval shunt; 49 angiographic venous dilatations were performed (18 during initial intervention, 31 on review) including 10 recanalizations of occlusions. A combined transhepatic-transjugular approach was used for 10/49 procedures. Thrombolysis was performed in 5/18 and stent insertion in 6/18 patients. Three serious complications occurred (IVC stent migration, hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm, myocardial puncture). Follow-up, after initial intervention, has continued for a mean of 24.2 months (range 4 days-92 months). Symptoms related to hepatic venous outflow obstruction were fully relieved in 10/18 (56%) patients and partially relieved in 4/18 (22%) patients. Close monitoring (and re-intervention) during the early post-intervention period is needed because 28% of initial venous dilatations failed to provide adequate venous return in the first instance. Once the patient is stabilized regular review is mandatory as HV restenosis is common after 10 months or more follow-up. The efficacy and safety of radiological intervention make it the preferred first line of treatment in selected patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Sterno-laparotomy and extracorporeal circulation for liver transplantation after repeat-surgery for Budd-Chiari syndrome

The surgical management of two patients undergoing living transplantation for Budd-Chiari syndrome is reported. Mesenteriocaval shunt had previously been performed in both cases, followed by transcaval liver resection and hepatoatrial anastomosis after 3 and 5 years, respectively. Liver transplantation was necessitated by deteriorating liver function with portal hypertension and recurrent bleeding. The successful operation was performed via sternolaparotomy. Atrioatrial anastomosis was constructed during cardiopulmonary bypass, considerably simplifying the technical procedure and dramatically reducing blood loss.

Budd-Chiari syndrome

Budd-Chiari syndrome is the generic term for different forms of hepatic venous outflow obstruction resulting in a clinical picture of portal hypertension and hepatomegaly. Three levels of venous outflow obstruction may be recognized, affecting respectively the small intrahepatic (IVC). Each level of obstruction is related to a different aetiology. Clinical manifestations range from mild symptoms to acute or chronic end-stage liver disease. Treatment is surgical in the great majority of patients. Occlusion of the IVC may be treated by removal of the caval obstruction in selected patients. Hepatic outflow obstruction may be circumvented by different forms of shunting from the portal or upper mesenteric vein to the IVC or right atrium, depending on the level of obstruction and the difference in venous pressure. For the rare patient presenting with acute or chronic end-stage liver failure, hepatic transplantation may be a life-saving procedure.

Mesocaval interposition shunt with small-diameter polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in sclerotherapy failure

Fifty-seven patients with failed sclerotherapy received a mesocaval interposition shunt with an externally supported, ringed polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis of either 10 or 12 mm diameter. Thirty-one patients had Child-Pugh grade A disease and 26 grade B; all had a liver volume of 1000-2500 ml. Follow-up ranged from 16 months to 6 years 3 months. Three patients (5 per cent) died in the postoperative period. There were two postoperative recurrences of variceal haemorrhage and one recurrent bleed in the second year after surgery. The cumulative shunt patency rate was 95 per cent and the incidence of encephalopathy 9 per cent; the latter was successfully managed by protein restriction and/or lactulose therapy. The actuarial survival rate for the whole group at 6 years was 78 per cent, for those with Child-Pugh grade A 88 per cent and for grade B 67 per cent. Small-lumen mesocaval interposition shunting achieves portal decompression, preserves hepatopetal flow, has a low incidence of shunt thrombosis, prevents recurrent variceal bleeding and is not associated with significant postoperative encephalopathy.

Effect of distal splenorenal shunt on survival of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

Distal splenorenal shunt is known to effectively control bleeding from esophageal and gastric varices; however, the effect of this selective shunt on liver function is less well understood. We examined retrospectively the effect of distal splenorenal shunt on the survival of 19 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis subjected to surgery for bleeding varices over a 20-yr period and had been followed for at least 1 yr. Actual Kaplan-Meier survival curve was compared with predicted survival curve based on the Mayo Clinic model using clinical data collected at the time of surgery. The patients median length of follow-up was 65.9 mo. Ten of the 19 patients died or underwent orthotopic liver transplantation during the period of observation. The actual Kaplan-Meier and predicted Mayo Clinic model survival curves were similar and did not differ significantly. Survival was best in patients with good liver function (i.e., low Mayo risk scores). Distal splenorenal shunt, therefore, did not appear to have an adverse effect on the survival of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. We conclude that variceal bleeding in primary biliary cirrhosis patients with good liver function should not be considered an indication for liver transplantation. Instead, if treatment with sclerotherapy or beta-blockers fails then distal splenorenal shunt will prevent recurrent bleeding in 90% of patients and leave them with an excellent prognosis.

Impact of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt on orthotopic liver transplantation

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is being increasingly utilized prior to liver transplantation for portal hypertensive bleeding refractory to sclerotherapy or as initial management of variceal bleeding. The impact of TIPS on subsequent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of TIPS on OLT in terms of operative transfusion requirements, operative time, length of hospital stay, and graft and patient survival. The results in 17 patients undergoing TIPS for control of initial or recurrent variceal bleeding prior to OLT between June 1991 and December 1992 were compared to two other groups undergoing transplantation: 32 control patients with a history of variceal bleeding not treated by TIPS and 11 patients with a previous surgical portosystemic shunt. Compared with control and surgical shunt patients, patients who underwent TIPS had less transfusion requirement for packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma during OLT. The operative time and hospital stay of the TIPS patients were slightly, but not significantly, less. In contrast to patients having TIPS, the patients with a history of a previous surgical shunt had an increased requirement for packed red blood cells, longer operative time, and longer stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. Two patients had recurrent variceal bleeding after TIPS; one patient was found to have an occluded stent, and the other patient (with a patent stent) responded to sclerotherapy. Of the 14 patients with ascites, 8 patients improved and 6 patients had complete resolution after TIPS. There were no major complications related to TIPS, although 3 patients had new or recurrent hepatic encephalopathy that was easily manageable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Treatment of portal hypertension in children

The management of children with portal hypertension (PH) has substantially changed owing to the good results and broader application of both endoscopic sclerotherapy and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Since the introduction of sclerotherapy for the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices, the number of surgical procedures has sharply decreased. Until the early 1980s, however, the treatment of choice of bleeding esophageal varices was based on different variations of two main types of open surgery: devacularization and transection operations and portosystemic shunts. The experience with nonshunt procedures is limited in the pediatric population. Literature reports from the last 25 years have emphasized a number of restrictions related to portosystemic shunts in small subjects. However, portosystemic shunts, selective or not, can be performed even in very young subjects with high rates of success. From 1974 to 1984 the distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) was the procedure of choice for the treatment of children with variceal bleeding in our institution. Forty-two children underwent DSRS during this period. Since 1985, when endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy (EVS) replaced DSRS as the first therapeutic option in our service, this shunt has been performed in only 8 children in whom EVS has failed, none of them during the last 2 years. In this cohort of 50 cases of DSRS, the shunt patency has increased from 71% in the first 7 patients to 95% thereafter. There has been no perioperative mortality. From 1985 to April 1993, 107 children were submitted to EVS sessions for the treatment of esophageal varices bleeding.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Role of liver transplantation in management of esophageal variceal hemorrhage

The management of esophageal variceal hemorrhage ranges from conservative to surgical modalities. Before introduction of liver transplantation as a potentially curative therapy of the underlying etiology, decompressive portosystemic shunt operations have been the mainstay of mostly palliative procedures. Our own experience with surgery for advanced hepatic disease and portal hypertension over 20 years includes 803 liver transplantations and 201 portosystemic shunts, emphasizing our primary objective of treatment. The results after shunt surgery were favorable in Child class A candidates when performed electively and with selective decompression. After liver replacement the clinical status of the patient, including hepatic function and extrahepatic complications, had a strong influence on postoperative outcome, with the chance of excellent long-term survival. The additional risk of previous shunt surgery for subsequent transplantation could be reduced over time. Based on this experience and reports from others there are enough reasonable arguments for shunt and transplantation. Instead of the choice being controversial, the two forms of therapy should supplement each other and be available in the same center that specializes in the treatment of patients with diseases that eventually lead to liver failure and portal hypertension. Selection of either approach must depend on etiology, stage of the disease, and proper timing. Shunt procedures may be indicated in stable patients with the risk of bleeding after sclerotherapy failure, in those with contraindications to transplantation, or as a bridge to transplantation. The role of liver transplantation has been clearly established in patients with progressive or endstage (otherwise intractable) hepatobiliary disease.

Use of distal splenorenal shunt in children referred for liver transplant evaluation

Variceal bleeding remains a common cause of morbidity for children with both intrahepatic and extrahepatic portal hypertension. Occasionally, patients referred for liver transplant evaluation have significant variceal bleeding, despite adequate synthetic liver function. During a 7-year period, 322 children were referred for liver transplant evaluation. Six underwent distal splenorenal shunt surgery after evaluation. There were four boys and two girls. The average age was 11 +/- 4 years, and the average weight was 39 +/- 15 kg. The etiology of variceal bleeding was intrahepatic portal hypertension in five (1 biliary atresia, 2 chronic hepatitis, 2 congenital hepatic fibrosis) and extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis in one. Two patients had no previous attempts at sclerotherapy (one because of an abnormality in platelet function, the other because of extensive gastric varices), and four had multiple previous sclerotherapy treatments. No patient had preoperative encephalopathy. Three cases were Child's class A, and three were Child's class B. Preoperative evaluation of the portasystemic system was performed with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging or splenoportography. All patients underwent a distal splenorenal shunt procedure, four of whom also had splenopancreatic disconnection. One patient required 100 mL of blood replacement, and five required no blood. The average length of hospital stay was 9.8 +/- 2.2 days. Postoperative complications were minimal. All patients are alive, without recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding or encephalopathy, and they have patent shunts, which was confirmed by MR or Doppler ultrasound at a mean of 25 +/- 20 months after shunt surgery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic stent shunting for control of acute and recurrent upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage related to portal hypertension

The insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic stent shunt (TIPSS) was evaluated in 22 patients with recurrent upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage related to portal hypertension (bleeding from oesophageal varices 10, gastric varices six, portal hypertensive gastropathy six). TIPSS was successfully performed electively in 15 patients and as an emergency in three patients. Twelve patients have had no further admissions with bleeding after TIPSS. Single episodes of bleeding were noted in six patients after TIPSS associated with shunt thrombosis (two), intimal hyperplasia within the shunt (two), and shunt migration (one). Another patient presented with reaccumulated ascites suggesting poor shunt function but died from massive variceal haemorrhage before further assessment could be performed. There was one death related to the procedure. Two patients developed encephalopathy after TIPSS, in one patient this was controlled by the insertion of a smaller diameter stent within the existing TIPSS. Several complications arose in earlier patients that have not recurred after modification of the initial technique. TIPSS can be life saving and is effective in controlling variceal haemorrhage and rebleeding from oesophageal or gastric varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy. Larger and longer term studies are required, however, to define the role of TIPSS in the overall management of such patients.

Selection of patients for liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is now available world-wide. It plays an important role in the treatment of irreversible acute and chronic liver disease (CLD). Selection of patients for liver transplantation is subject to many factors including economic, cultural, availability of donor organs and degree of illness. This article looks at seven general considerations for recipients of liver transplantation. As well, disease-specific criteria are investigated and include such areas as cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive cirrhosis, fulminant hepatic failure (FHF), malignancy, alcoholic liver disease (ALD), metabolic conditions and Budd-Chiari syndrome. If hepatic transplantation survival rates were to approach 95%, the relative risk ratio between transplantation and conservative therapy would increase. At present an 80% 1-5 year survival rate following transplantation should be expected.

Portal hypertension and bleeding esophageal varices

Bleeding from esophageal varices exacts a high mortality and extraordinary societal costs. Prophylaxis--medication, sclerotherapy, or shunt surgery to prevent an initial bleeding episode--is ineffective. In patients who have bled from varices, endoscopic injection sclerotherapy can control acute bleeding in more than 90% of patients. Because recurrent bleeding frequently occurs and survival without definitive therapy is dismal, selection of a permanently effective treatment is mandatory once variceal bleeding has been controlled. Long-term injection sclerotherapy can be performed in compliant patients; it is relatively safe but is associated with a 30-50% rebleeding rate. Beta-blockers significantly reduce portal pressure and recurrent bleeding but have not been shown to diminish mortality from BEV. Portal decompressive surgery permanently halts bleeding in more than 90% of patients; the risk of operative mortality is high in decompensated cirrhotics, and long-term complications of encephalopathy and accelerated liver failure may limit indications for shunt surgery to good-risk cirrhotics who are not liver transplant candidates. Devascularization procedures have a low operative mortality and encephalopathy rate but unacceptably high rates of recurrent bleeding. Liver transplantation is curative therapy for bleeding esophageal varices and the associated underlying hepatic dysfunction; cost and availability of donor organs generally limit its use in this setting to variceal bleeders with end-stage liver disease not associated with active alcoholism.