Urological complications in 210 consecutive simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants with bladder drainage

Pregnancy After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation in Treatment of End-Stage Diabetes Mellitus: a Review

The majority of patients with simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant (SPKT) required transplantation owing to a long-standing history of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). The disease causes multiple organ damage, impairs fertility, and affects quality of life. A successful kidney and pancreas transplant can improve health, ameliorate the consequences of pre-existent diabetes, and restore fertility. Good graft function, without any sign of rejection, and stable doses of immunosuppressant drugs are of utmost importance prior to the planned pregnancy. SPKT recipients who become pregnant may be at an increased risk for an adverse outcome and require meticulous multidisciplinary surveillance. We present experiences with SPKT pregnancies, traditional approaches, and recent considerations. In light of complex interactions between new anatomic relations and the impact of developing pregnancy and immunosuppressive medications, special stress is put on the risk of graft rejection, development of pregnancy complications, and potential harmful effects on fetal development. Recent recommendations in management of SPKT recipients who wish to commence pregnancy are presented as well. Key words: transplantation, pregnancy, pancreas, kidney, simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPKT).

Pancreas transplant with enteric drainage at a single institute in Asia

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

This study is to assess immunological and graft survival outcomes after pancreas transplant at a single institute in Asia.

METHODS

Patients undergoing pancreas transplant with enteric drainage were included. Clinical data and outcomes were evaluated and compared between each subgroup.

RESULTS

There were 165 cases of pancreas transplant, including 38 (23 %) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK), 24 (15 %) pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK), 75 (46 %) pancreas transplant alone (PTA), and 28 (17 %) pancreas before kidney transplant (PBK). The overall surgical complication rate was 46.1 %, with highest (62.5 %) in PAK and lowest (32.0 %) in PTA, P = 0.008. The late complications included 32.7 % infection and 3.6 % malignancy. Overall rejection of pancreas graft was 24.8 % including 18.2 % acute and 9.7 % chronic rejection. Rejection was highest in PTA group (36.0 %) and lowest in PBK (3.6 %). There were 56 cases (33.9 %) with graft loss in total, with highest graft loss rate in PTA (38.7 %). The 1-year, 5-year and 10-year pancreas graft survivals for total patients were 98.0 %, 87.7 % and 70.9 % respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Enteric drainage in pancreas transplant could be applied safely not only in SPK but also in other subgroups. Enteric drainage itself would not compromise the immunological and graft survival outcomes.

Exocrine drainage in pancreas transplantation: Complications and management

The aim of this minireview is to compare various pancreas transplantation exocrine drainage techniques i.e., bladder vs enteric. Both techniques have different difficulties and complications. Numerous comparisons have been made in the literature between exocrine drainage techniques throughout the history of pancreas transplantation, detailing complications and their impact on graft and patient survival. Specific emphasis has been made on the early postoperative management of these complications and the related surgical infections and their consequences. In light of the results, a number of bladder-drained pancreas grafts required conversion to enteric drainage. As a result of technical improvements, outcomes of the varied enteric exocrine drainage techniques (duodenojejunostomy, duodenoduodenostomy or gastric drainage) have also been discussed i.e., assessing specific risks vs benefits. Pancreatic exocrine secretions can be drained to the urinary or intestinal tracts. Until the late 1990s the bladder drainage technique was used in the majority of transplant centers due to ease of monitoring urine amylase and lipase levels for evaluation of possible rejection. Moreover, bladder drainage was associated at that time with fewer surgical complications, which in contrast to enteric drainage, could be managed with conservative therapies. Nowadays, the most commonly used technique for proper driving of exocrine pancreatic secretions is enteric drainage due to the high rate of urological and metabolic complications associated with bladder drainage. Of note, 10% to 40% of bladder-drained pancreata eventually required enteric conversion at no detriment to overall graft survival. Various surgical techniques were originally described using the small bowel for enteric anastomosis with Roux-en-Y loop or a direct side-to-side anastomosis. Despite the improvements in surgery, enteric drainage complication rates ranging from 2%-20% have been reported. Treatment depends on the presence of any associated complications and the condition of the patient. Intra-abdominal infection represents a potentially very serious problem. Up to 30% of deep wound infections are associated with an anastomotic leak. They can lead not only to high rates of graft loss, but also to substantial mortality. New modifications of established techniques are being developed, such as gastric or duodenal exocrine drainage. Duodenoduodenostomy is an interesting option, in which the pancreas is placed behind the right colon and is oriented cephalad. The main concern of this technique is the challenge of repairing the native duodenum when allograft pancreatectomy is necessary. Identification and prevention of technical failure remains the main objective for pancreas transplantation surgeons. In conclusion, despite numerous techniques to minimize exocrine pancreatic drainage complications e.g., leakage and infection, no universal technique has been standardized. A prospective study/registry analysis may resolve this.

More Than 25 Years of Pancreas Graft Survival After Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation: Experience From the World's Largest Series of Long-term Survivors

BACKGROUND

The first simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant was performed in 1966. Early procedures were associated with significant morbidity and mortality and were performed in very low numbers in select patients.

METHODS

This study includes all recipients of an SPK at the University of Wisconsin-Madison between 1986 and 1993, who were actively followed and had a functional pancreas allograft for >25 years as of October 31, 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 291 SPK were performed during the study period; of these, 39 patients still had a functional graft at last follow up and 9 (18.8%) pancreas grafts were lost due to patient death or graft failure after >25 years. At last follow up, all 39 patients with functional pancreas graft had at least one comorbidity, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or coronary artery disease. Twenty-seven required enteric conversion; 11 patients experienced renal allograft failure (10 underwent a repeat kidney transplant); and 6 required amputation of part of the lower extremity. In the Cox regression analysis, bladder drained pancreas was associated with lower probability of prolonged pancreas graft survival (hazard ratio: 0.52; confidence interval: 0.32-0.85; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

With careful and detailed follow-up and attention to complications, some recipients of pancreas grafts have outstanding outcomes. As the number of pancreas recipients with prolonged graft survival may be rising, healthcare providers should be aware of the management of complications associated with this unique group of patients.

Management of vascular and nonvascular complications following pancreas transplantation with interventional radiology

Pancreas transplantation exposes to high rates of complications, either vascular (thrombosis, stenosis, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula) or nonvascular (fluid collection, graft rejection). With advances in percutaneous and endovascular techniques, interventional radiologists are increasingly involved in the management of these complications. In this article, we review the anatomical considerations relevant to pancreas transplantation, the techniques used for image-guided interventions for vascular and nonvascular complications, and the expected outcomes of these interventions.

Duodenal graft complications requiring duodenectomy after pancreas and pancreas-kidney transplantation

Duodenal graft complications are poorly reported complications of pancreas transplantation that can result in graft loss. Excluding patients with early graft failure, after a median follow-up period of 126 months (range 23-198) duodenectomy was required in 14 of 312 pancreas transplants (4.5%). All patients were insulin-independent at the time of diagnosis. Reasons for duodenectomy included delayed duodenal graft perforation (n = 10, 71.5%) and refractory duodenal graft bleeding (n = 4, 28.5%). In patients with duodenal graft bleeding, a total duodenectomy was performed. In patients with duodenal graft perforation, preservation of a duodenal segment was possible in five patients but completion duodenectomy was necessary in one patient. After total duodenectomy, immediate enteric duct drainage was feasible in seven patients. In two patients, a pancreaticocutaneous fistula was created that was subsequently converted to enteric drainage in one patient. In the other patient, enteric fistulization occurred as a consequence of silent pressure perforation of the draining catheter on the ascending colon. After a mean follow-up period of 52 months (21-125), all patients were alive, well, and insulin-independent. An aggressive and timely surgical approach may permit graft rescue in patients with severe duodenal graft complications occurring after pancreas transplantation. Generalization of these results remains to be established.

Surgery of pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The surgical techniques of pancreas transplantation have been evolving and significantly improved over time. This article discusses different current techniques and their modifications.

RECENT FINDING

At this time, the most commonly used technique is systemic venous drainage (for venous outflow) and enteric drainage (for management of exocrine pancreatic secretions). However, new modifications of established techniques such as gastric or duodenal exocrine drainage and venous drainage to the inferior vena cava continue to be introduced.

SUMMARY

This article provides a state-of the-art review of the most prevalent up-to-date surgical techniques as well as a synopsis of their specific risks and benefits. The article also provides the most current registry data regarding utilization of different surgical techniques in the United State and worldwide.

Delayed graft duodenal perforation due to impacted food five years after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Pancreas transplantation is the best treatment option in selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Here we report a patient with a nonmarginal duodenal perforation five years after a simultaneous pancreas-living donor kidney transplantation (SPLKT).

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 31-year old male who underwent SPLKT five years previously presented with severe abdominal pain. He had a marginal duodenal perforation four years later, treated by primary closure and drainage. Biopsy of the pancreas and duodenum graft at that time showed chronic rejection in the pancreas and acute inflammation with an ulcer in the duodenum. At presentation, computerized tomography scan showed mesenteric pneumatosis with enteric leak and ileal dilatation proximal to the anastomotic site. We performed emergent laparotomy and found a 1.0cm perforation at the nonmarginal, posterior wall of the duodenum. Undigested fiber-rich food was extracted from the site and an omental patch placed over the perforation. An ileostomy was created proximal to the omega loop for decompression and a drain placed nearby. The postoperative course was unremarkable.

DISCUSSION

There are only eight previous cases of graft duodenal perforation in the literature. Fiber-rich food residue passing through the anastomosis with impaction may have led to this perforation.

CONCLUSION

When a patient is stable, even in the presence of delayed duodenal graft perforation, graft excision may not be necessary. Intraoperative exploration should include Doppler ultrasound examination of the vasculature to rule out thrombosis as a contributor to ischemia. Tissue biopsy should be performed to diagnose rejection.

Imaging of Pancreas Transplantation and Its Complications

Whole pancreas transplantation is an effective treatment for obtaining euglycemic status in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and is usually performed concurrent with renal transplantation in the affected patient. This article discusses complex surgical anatomical details of pancreas transplantation including surgical options for endocrine and exocrine drainage pathways. It then describes several possible complications related to surgical factors in the immediate post operative period followed by other complications related to systemic issues, vasculature, and the pancreatic parenchyma.

Improving monitoring after pancreas transplantation alone: fine-tuning of an old technique

Graft survival after pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) is significantly poorer than graft survival after simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) and is particularly affected by difficulty in monitoring rejection. Exocrine bladder drainage allows assessment of pancreas graft function as urinary amylase (UA). However, standards for UA collection and interpretation are not well defined. In this study, 21 bladder-drained PTA recipients were monitored with daily values for UA and urine creatinine (Creat) concentration from post-transplant 10-mL samples and 24-h collections. Clinical events were documented and correlated to UA measurements. UA values were found to increase post-transplant until day 15, and large interpatient variability was noted (median 12 676 IU/L, range 668-60 369 IU/L). A strong correlation was found total 24-h UA production and spot UA/Creat ratio (r = 0.80, p < 0.001). UA/Creat ratio showed less variation during episodes of impaired renal function; therefore, urinary amylase baseline was defined as the median UA/Creat ratio after day 15. A > 25% decrease of UA predicted 9/13 (69%) events. We conclude that individual baselines should be set once the values have stabilized after 15 d post-transplant and that spot UA/Creat measures are reliable, patient friendly and indicate potential events after PTA.

125 Cases of duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation: a single-centre experience of an alternative enteric drainage

Several exocrine drainage procedures have been successfully developed to perform pancreas transplantation (PT). Retroperitoneal graft placement allows exocrine drainage via direct duodenoduodenostomy (DD). This technique provides easy access for endoscopic surveillance and biopsy. A total of 241 PT procedures were performed in our centre between 2002 and 2012. DD was performed in 125 patients, and duodenojejunostomy (DJ) in 116 patients. We retrospectively compared our experience with these two types of enteric drainage, focusing on graft and patient survivals, as well as postoperative complications. With a mean follow-up of 59 months, both groups demonstrated comparable patient and graft survivals. 14 (11%) of 125 cases in the DD group and 21 (18%) of 116 cases in the DJ group had pancreatic graft loss (P = 0.142). Graft thrombosis [5 (4%) vs. 18 (16%) P = 0.002], anastomotic insufficiency [2 (1.6%) vs. 8 (7%) P = 0.052] and relaparotomy [52 (41%) vs. 56 (48%) P = 0.29] occurred more frequently in the DJ group, whereas gastrointestinal bleeding [14 (11%) vs. 4 (3%) P = 0.026] occurred more often in the DD group. DD is a feasible and safe technique in PT, with no increase in enteric complications. It is equivalent to other established techniques and extends the feasibility of anastomotic sites, especially in recipients who have undergone a second transplantation.

Transplantation of the pancreas

Pancreas transplantation consistently induces insulin-independence in beta-cell-penic diabetic patients, but at the cost of major surgery and life-long immunosuppression. One year after grafting, patient survival rate now exceeds 95 % across recipient categories, while insulin independence is maintained in some 85 % of simultaneous pancreas and kidney recipients and in nearly 80 % of solitary pancreas transplant recipients. The half-life of the pancreas graft currently averages 16.7 years, being the longest among extrarenal grafts, and substantially matching the one of renal grafts from deceased donors. The difference between expected (100 %) and actual insulin-independence rate is mostly explained by technical failure in the postoperative phase, and rejection in the long-term period. Death with a functioning graft remains a further major issue, especially in uremic patients who have undergone prolonged periods of dialysis. Refinements in graft preservation, surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and prophylactic treatments are expected to further improve the results of pancreas transplantation.

Duodenum-stomach anastomosis: a new technique for exocrine drainage in pancreas transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Poor vascular access due to previous surgery can be a major obstacle in pancreas transplantation for which new exocrine and vascular outflow techniques might be useful. A 34-year-old female with early onset type 1 diabetes who underwent living donor kidney transplantation 20 years ago and a failed pancreas transplantation 2 years ago presented for pancreas retransplantation.

METHODS

The inferior vena cava was used in the previous deceased donor pancreas transplantation and both iliac arteries had intense perivascular fibrosis, making arterial anastomosis impossible. The only remaining option for the implant was the infrarenal aorta, with venous drainage to the superior mesenteric vein and exocrine drainage to the gastric antrum.

RESULTS

The patient had an uneventful recovery and graft function appeared normal. This report shows that when the recipient's abdominal cavity does not provide clear access for the usual surgical techniques regarding exocrine drainage, the stomach drainage procedure is an option.

CONCLUSION

Duodenum-stomach anastomosis might be an alternative to portal enteric drainage because there is easy access for graft biopsies and even for procedures involving the papilla major.

Evolution of β-Cell Replacement Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus: Pancreas Transplantation

Diabetes mellitus remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 23.6 million people in the United States are affected. Of these individuals, 5-10% have been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus (TIDM), an autoimmune disease. Although it often appears in childhood, T1DM may manifest at any age. The effects of T1DM can be devastating, as the disease often leads to significant secondary complications, morbidity, and decreased quality of life. Since the late 1960s, surgical treatment for diabetes mellitus has continued to evolve and has become a viable alternative to chronic insulin administration. In this review, the historical evolution, current status, graft efficacy, benefits, and complications of pancreas transplantation are explored.

Evolution of pancreas transplant surgery

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a chronic condition often leading to disabling complications including retinopathy, neuropathy and cardiovascular disease which can be modified by intensive treatment with insulin. Such treatment, however, is associated with a restrictive lifestyle and risk of hypoglycaemic morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

This review examines the role of pancreas transplantation in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Pancreas transplantation is currently the only proven option to achieve long-term insulin independence, resulting in an improvement or stabilization of those diabetic related complications. The hazards of pancreas transplantation as a major operation are well known. Balancing the risks of a surgical procedure, with the benefits of restoring normoglycaemia remains an important task for the pancreas transplant surgeon. Pancreas transplantation is not an emergency operation to treat poorly managed and non-compliant patients with debilitating complications. It is a highly specialized procedure which has evolved both in terms of the surgical technique, patient selection and assessment.

CONCLUSION

Pancreas transplantation has emerged as the single most effective way to achieve normal glucose homeostasis in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Enteric conversion after pancreatic transplantation: resolution of symptoms and long-term results

PURPOSE

Bladder drainage (BD) of pancreatic transplants is associated with a unique set of complications. We intended to analyze the incidence, indications, complications and long-term results of enteric conversion procedures (EC).

METHODS

Using a prospective database, 32 EC patients out of 433 simultaneous pancreas-kidney-transplant (SPK) recipients were identified. Graft and patient survival rates were compared with those after primary enteric drainage (ED).

RESULTS

The mean SPK-EC interval was 5.0 yr, and the mean patient follow-up was 13.8 yr. Indications for EC were genitourinary symptoms (62.5%), duodenal complications (15.6%), graft pancreatitis (12.5%), pyelonephritis (6.3%), and metabolic acidosis (3.1%). All patients reported significant long-term resolution of symptoms. Surgical complications, reoperations, early graft loss, and 30-d mortality occurred in 31.3%, 25.0%, 6.3%, and 3.1% of cases, respectively. Pancreatic graft and patient survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 yr after SPK were comparable between EC patients and ED patients at the same institution.

CONCLUSION

For the treatment of symptoms associated with BD, EC results in excellent long-term graft function and significant resolution of symptoms even years after SPK. Postoperative morbidity after EC including early reoperation and graft loss, however, has to be considered.

Surgical techniques for pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pancreas transplantation reproducibly induces insulin independence in beta-cell penic diabetic patients. The difference between full insulin independence, partial graft function, and graft loss, mostly results from technical failure, graft rejection, and patient death with function graft. The purpose of this review is to examine recent surgical advances and discuss their contribution to improved graft function.

RECENT FINDINGS

Few actual surgical innovations were described in the period reviewed. Duodenoduodenostomy is an interesting option for drainage of digestive secretions, when the pancreas is placed behind the right colon and is oriented cephalad. The main advantage of this technique is easy endoscopic assessment of donor duodenum but, when allograft pancreatectomy is necessary, repair of native duodenum may be troublesome. Selective revascularization of the gastroduodenal artery, at the back-table, possibly improves blood supply to the head of the pancreas graft and duodenal segment. There is no proof that this additional maneuver is always beneficial, although it can be graft saving in case of poor segmental graft perfusion.

SUMMARY

Transplant surgeons should be familiar with all techniques for pancreas transplantation. Long-term graft function is possible only after technically successful pancreas transplantation. There is clearly a need for more objective assessment and standardization of surgical techniques for pancreas transplantation.

Urological complications after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the incidence of urological complications after simultaneous renal and pancreatic transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed urological complications following 107 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantations performed at our institution between March 1995 and June 2008. The 46 women and 61 men were of mean age 37.8 years (range, 25-66). The mean duration of diabetes mellitus was 23.0 years (range, 9-48) and the mean duration of dialysis was 19.9 months (range, 0-70). The exocrine pancreatic secretions were drained to bladder in 58 cases, or enterically in 49 patients. The mean length of follow-up was 51.7 months.

RESULTS

The most frequent urological complication was urinary tract infection, reported in 63.8% of patients: 42 bladder-drained and 25 enteric-drained (P = .011). Hematuria occurred in 13 patients (12.5%): 12 bladder-drained and 1 enteric-drained (P = .002). Five bladder-drained patients developed bladder calculi. Among 58 bladder-drained patients, reflux pancreatitis occurred in 28 patients and urine leaks related to the pancreatic graft occurred in 7 patients. Conversion of exocrine secretions from bladder to enteric diversion was required in 6 patients. One- and 3-year patient survival rates were 92.7% and 89.1%, respectively. Moreover, 1 and 3-year kidney graft survival rates were 90.6% and 84.4%, and pancreas graft survival rates were 78.1 and 70.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation with bladder drainage is associated with a high frequency of urological complications. Appropriate treatment can resolve most complications. In our opinion, both enteric and bladder drainage seemed to be safe and effective alternatives to manage pancreatic exocrine secretions.

Compative study of bladder versus enteric drainage in pancreas transplantation

INTRODUCTION

There is some controversy concerning the choice of best technique for drainage of exocrine secretions in pancreas transplantation. We compared patients with bladder drainage (BD) versus those with enteric drainage (ED).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From March 1995 to September 2008, 118 patients (68 men and 50 women) of overall mean age of 37.8 +/- 7.8 years underwent pancreas transplantation. There were 109 simultaneous pancreas-kidney, and 9 pancreas after kidney procedures. Recipients were divided in a BD (n = 66 patients) and an ED group (n = 52).

RESULTS

Donor characteristics were similar in both groups. Thirty-two patients (48.5%) of the BD group versus none in the ED group experienced urinary tract infections (UTI; P < .001), and 16 patients (24.2%) BD versus 15 (29.4%) ED developed intraabdominal infections (P = NS). The overall rate of relaparotomies was 33.9% (n = 40): 34.8% (n = 23) in the BD versus 32.7% (n = 17) in the ED group (P = NS). Thirty patients (25.4%) lost their pancreas grafts: 21 (31.8%) in the BD group versus 9 (17.3%) in the ED group (P = .055). The acute rejection rates were 12.7%; namely, 15.2% in the BD versus 9.8% in the ED (P = NS). Three-year patient and graft survivals were equivalent in both groups: 96.1% and 65.3% in the BD versus 89.0% and 74.0% in the ED group, respectively (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

ED is a good alternative to BD for drainage of pancreatic graft exocrine secretions because both techniques have the same patient and graft survival, but BD is associated with a significantly higher rate of UTI and urologic complications.

Transplante de pâncreas e ilhotas em portadores de diabetes melito

O transplante simultâneo de pâncreas/rim tem indicações específicas, riscos e benefícios. O procedimento, cada vez mais realizado, traz vantagens se comparado ao paciente em diálise, em relação à qualidade de vida, anos de vida ganhos e evolução das complicações crônicas. Se o paciente tiver a opção de realizar o transplante de rim com doador vivo, que apresenta sobrevida semelhante do enxerto e do paciente aos dez anos, o procedimento deverá ser considerado. O transplante de pâncreas após rim, quando efetivo, pode melhorar a evolução das complicações cardiovasculares, mas em contrapartida provoca maior mortalidade nos primeiros meses após a cirurgia. O transplante isolado de pâncreas também ocasiona a maior mortalidade pós-operatória, resultado da complexidade do procedimento e da imunossupressão. O transplante de ilhotas tem sua indicação para um seleto grupo de diabéticos com instabilidade glicêmica.

Pancreas-kidney and pancreas transplantation for the treatment of diabetes mellitus

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage diabetic nephropathy, but the ultimate treatment today for type 1 diabetes mellitus is the whole vascularized pancreas transplant. Although its use is increasing, pancreas transplantation remains an uncommonly used therapeutic option that normalizes glucose levels and results in stabilization or improvement in secondary complications far better than any other strategy available for treatment of type 1 diabetes. These documented benefits of a simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant are the basis for its acceptance as an appropriate therapy for patients who have type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease.

Pancreas graft salvage using pancreatico-duodenectomy with enteric drainage

As demand for donor pancreases increases, attempts are being made to utilize even marginal grafts for transplantation. Injury during pancreas recovery can predispose to posttransplant complications and graft loss. Early recognition and correction can salvage these grafts. The authors report an instance of poor segmental perfusion of the pancreas graft that was salvaged by pancreas head resection and enteric drainage through a Roux-en-Y pancreatico-jejunostomy.

Pancreas allograft biopsies in the management of pancreas transplant recipients: histopathologic review and clinical correlations

CONTEXT

Pancreas transplantation has become a therapeutic option for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus who are in end-stage renal failure. It also is indicated for a subset of nonuremic, insulin-dependent diabetics who experience extreme difficulties in maintaining proper glucose homeostasis by insulin therapy that compromises their productivity and safety.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a review of the literature and expert experiences for understanding the histologic findings in pancreas transplantation.

DATA SOURCES

The published literature between 1990 and 2005 was reviewed for this report. Additionally, personal files of the author were used, along with biopsy slides that were used for figures.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreas transplantation reestablishes the physiologic state of insulin secretion, and pancreas transplant recipients are able to maintain a state of long-term euglycemia and are less likely to be exposed to hyperglycemia and its systemic complications. Key to the success of transplantation is the scrupulous management and close monitoring of the pancreas transplant recipients. To that end, histologic evaluation of pancreas allografts assumed a pivotal role in management of pancreas allograft dysfunction episodes, and in some centers surveillance biopsies are used to monitor immunologically high-risk situations.

Pancreatic transplants: secretin-stimulated MR pancreatography

BACKGROUND

Our study was aimed to evaluate the functional status of pancreatic transplants using dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation.

METHODS

Thirteen asymptomatic patients previously submitted to isolated pancreas (n = 6) or combined kidney-pancreas (n = 7) transplantation, with enteric-portal pancreatic drainage, underwent MR examination at 1.5 T using a phased-array coil. After the acquisition of axial and coronal T1- and T2-weighted sequences, dynamic MR pancreatography was performed using a coronal breath-hold, thick-slab (40-60 mm), single-shot T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence. After the intravenous administration of secretin (Secrelux, Sanochemia; 1 cU/kg body/weight), a single-slice image acquisition was repeated every 30 s up to 15 min. We estimated the calibre changes of the pancreatic ductal system and the filling of the donor's duodenum on the basis of pancreatic secretion after secretin stimulation, also evaluated by using a mean signal intensity/time histogram in a chosen region of interest including the transplanted pancreas and the connected small bowel.

RESULTS

All patients well tolerated the examination, and no side effects were reported after secretin administration. In 12/13 cases, a significant increase (more than 1 mm) in the diameter of the mean pancreatic duct was observed after secretin stimulation; in all patients, a noticeable filling of the duodenal graft was demonstrated during dynamic MR pancreatography on both qualitative and quantitative analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic MR imaging after secretin administration allows non-invasive evaluation of exocrine function of the pancreatic transplants and could be used to differentiate patients with graft rejection from those with normal graft function.

Bladder vs enteric drainage in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

As a valid therapeutic option for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and secondary diabetic nephropathy, simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation remains more undeveloped than other solid organ transplantations due to restrictions of surgical techniques, especially modes of exocrine pancreatic secretion. Enteric drainage (ED) has recently been increasingly popular due to the long-term complications with bladder drainage (BD). Objectives. Compare results of SPK transplants with enteric vs bladder exocrine drainage since the beginning of our experience with this type of transplantation.

METHODS

From March 1998 to October 2004, 53 SPK transplants were performed, consisting of 30 with bladder drainage (BD) and 23 with enteric drainage (ED). Induction therapy included antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) or anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody. Maintenance regimen consisted of tacrolimus (TAC)/cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids.

RESULTS

Mean age of recipients was 39+/-7 in both groups. No anastomosis leakage occurred in either group. Surgical complications were not significantly different between the two groups. Incidence of acute rejection, major infections and cytomegalovirus disease were also similar. However, the BD group was characterized by a slight increase in number of urologic complications, metabolic acidosis and dehydration. The length of initial hospital stay was likewise comparable. All patients with a functional graft no longer required exogenous insulin. BD actuarial patient survival and graft three-year survival were 96 and 86%, respectively. For ED, the respective results were 97 and 91%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with BD, perioperative morbidity is not increased by ED, and ED is not associated with increased long-term pancreas graft failure. These data suggest that ED is superior to BD and should be considered as the preferred technique for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants.

Management of de novo nonneurogenic detrusor-sphincter dyscoordination in a bladder-drained pancreas and kidney transplantation case

Pancreas transplantation is associated with significant urological complications. Urological complications can jeopardize the graft survival. We present a de novo nonneurogenic detrusor-sphincter dyscoordination in a pancreas and kidney transplanted case. We also report follow-up under conservative treatment.

Ninety-Five Percent Insulin Independence Rate 3 Years After Pancreas Transplantation Alone With Portal-Enteric Drainage

AIMS

Portal-enteric drainage (PED) might be particularly suitable for pancreas transplantation alone (PTA), since it has been associated with an immunologic advantage and achieves excellent metabolic results. We describe our experience with a consecutive series of 40 PTAs with PED.

METHODS

Between April 2001 and March 2004, 40 consecutive PTAs were performed with PED. Recipients were selected according to the American Diabetic Association recommendations. Donors were selected according to standard criteria irrespective of HLA match, although matching for A and B loci was considered at the time of graft allocation. Immunosuppression consisted of induction treatment with basiliximab (n = 34) or thymoglobulin (n = 6), and maintenance therapy with steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus.

RESULTS

After a mean cold ischemia time of 690 minutes (range, 517-965 min) all pancreases functioned immediately. Three grafts were lost due to hyperacute or accelerated rejection. No graft was lost to vascular thrombosis, although 5 (12.5%) nonocclusive thromboses were identified and the grafts were rescued with intravenous heparin infusion. A repeat laparotomy was required in 7 recipients (17.5%) No patient required multiple repeat laparotomies, and none died. After a mean follow-up of 16.4 months (range, 1-36 mo), 2 recipients were diagnosed with rejection episodes, which were reversed with steroid boluses. Actuarial 3-year patient, and graft survival rates were 100% and 94.9%, respectively. The following parameters showed significant improvement compared with pretransplantation evaluation: hemoglobin A1C concentration, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, arterial blood pressure, cardiac performance, retinopathy, proteinuria, and neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreas transplantation alone with PED provides high rates of long-term insulin-independence.

Retroperitoneal pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage

BACKGROUND

Portal-enteric drainage (PED) is the latest refinement in the surgical technique for pancreas transplantation (PTx). We herein describe the results of a modified technique for PED that places the pancreas in a totally retroperitoneal position.

METHODS

Between April 2001 and June 2003, 79 PTx were performed using a retroperitoneal PED technique.

RESULTS

No graft was lost due to surgical complications and the relaparotomy rate was 11.4%. Mean hospital stay averaged 25.9 days (+/-14.4 days) with a 30-day readmission rate of 12.7%. One graft was lost due to delayed (6 months) arterial thrombosis and three to acute rejection. The overall 1-year patient and graft survivals were 98.7% and 93.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm that PED of pancreas grafts is associated with low morbidity and mortality rates. Whether retroperitoneal graft placement has actual advantages over the "classical" intraperitoneal position remains to be ascertained.

Outcome of simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation: a single center analysis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation (SKPT) by various surgical techniques. The 161 patients submitted to SKPT underwent the following: 36 pancreas with duct occlusion (from 1985 to 1989), 75 with whole pancreas with bladder diversion (from 1990 to 1998), and 50 whole pancreas with enteric diversion (40 with systemic and 10 with portal drainage) (from 1999 to September 2002). A positive effect on patient survival was evident using enteric diversion versus the duct occlusion group (P = .005), and versus the bladder diversion group (.035), and on pancreas graft survival in the enteric diversion versus the duct occlusion group (P < .028). These improvements may be due to refined donor and patient selection criteria, surgical technique, and immunosuppression.

Portal enteric–drained solitary pancreas transplantation without surveillance biopsy: is it safe?

BACKGROUND

Most solitary pancreas transplants (SPTx) fail due to unrecognized rejection episodes. Consequently, SPTx are monitored by drainage into the bladder or by surveillance biopsies.

METHODS

Between April 2001 and June 2003, a consecutive series of 48 SPTx were performed using portal enteric drainage (PED). Rejection episodes were diagnosed empirically, based on the elevated pancreatic enzymes without a surveillance biopsy. Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab (n = 42) or ATG (n = 6), low-dose steroids, MMF, and tacrolimus. Donors (mean age 28.9 year; range 9 to 54 year) were selected according to standard criteria irrespective of HLA match, although the best HLA matching was considered at the time of graft allocation.

RESULTS

After a mean cold ischemia time of 676 minutes (range 475 to 900 minutes), all but two pancreata (95.8%) functioned immediately. Relaparotomy was required in seven cases (14.6%). Three grafts were lost in the early posttransplant period due to hyperacute rejection. Two additional grafts were lost later due to arterial thrombosis or to chronic rejection. After a median follow-up period of 12.2 months (range 0.2 to 27 months) three further recipients were diagnosed with rejection episodes that were reversed with steroid boluses. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival rates were 100% and 93.1% and 2-year figures 100% and 88.7%, respectively. At the longest follow-up no recipient was diagnosed with a malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

With current immunosuppression protocols SPTx achieves high rates of insulin independence even without surveillance biopsy or routine use of T-cell-depleting therapies.

Massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to rupture of a donor pancreatic artery pseudoaneurysm in a pancreas transplant patient

Enteric drainage of secretions by anastomosing the donor duodenum to the recipient's small bowel has become common in pancreatic transplantation. While it eliminates many problems, endoscopic access to the transplanted duodenum and pancreas is made difficult. After a pancreas kidney transplant, the patient presented with massive hematochezia. Upper and lower endoscopy revealed large amounts of red blood in the colon but no specific bleeding site. Mesenteric angiography was normal but pelvic angiography showed rapid extravasation of contrast from a pseudoaneurysm of the pancreatic transplant artery. This was successfully embolized with coils. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage because of rupture of a pseudoaneurysm of the donor pancreatic artery in a pancreas transplant patient. We report this case and review our institution's experience with all forms of gastrointestinal bleeding in pancreas transplant patients.

Urological complications after simultaneous renal and pancreatic transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To report the urological complications after simultaneous renal and pancreatic transplantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Teaching hospital, Italy.

SUBJECTS

143 consecutive patients having simultaneous renal and pancreatic transplantation by one of three techniques. 33 segmental pancreas with duct occlusion, 77 whole pancreas with bladder diversion, and 33 enteric diversion with systemic (n = 26) or portal venous drainage (n = 7). Urological complications were related to the pancreatic transplant, to the renal transplant, or unrelated to the transplant.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Morbidity.

RESULTS

After occlusion of the duct and enteric diversion, there were no urological complications related to the pancreatic transplant. On the other hand, among the 77 patients with pancreatic drainage into the bladder, urological complications were common (56/77; 73%). Complications related to the renal transplant were recorded in 6/33 (18%), 26/77 (34%) and 12/33 (36%), respectively. Complications unrelated to the transplant occurred in 6/77 patients (8%) in the bladder drainage group. Five patients after bladder drainage required cystoenteric conversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Enteric diversion is a safe alternative to bladder diversion and results in significantly fewer urological complications.

Urodynamic testing predicts long-term urological complications following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Combined pancreas-kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with type I diabetes mellitus associated with chronic renal failure. The introduction of the bladder drainage technique constituted a marked improvement of the surgical technique with a reduction of life-threatening complications. However, drainage of pancreatic secretions via the urinary bladder causes urological complications leading, in some cases, to cystoenteric conversion. We retrospectively analysed whether pre-operative urodynamic findings may predict the subsequent development of urological complications and influence the choice of exocrine secretion drainage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1987 to 1997, 39 bladder-drained simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations were performed in 16 men and 23 women with a mean age of 38.5 yr. All patients underwent a complete urological assessment prior to surgery, including medical history, physical examination, urethrocystography and urodynamic assessment.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients are alive with a mean follow-up of 62 +/- 8 months. In 60% of cases, both kidney and pancreas remain functional. Seven patients experienced recurrent lower urinary tract infections. Six patients suffered from chemical urethritis (four men and two women) and six suffered from recurrent haematuria (blood transfusions were required in two patients). One patient had incrusted stones at the site of duodenal staples. Urological complications were mostly observed in the 22 patients (79%) with abnormal urodynamic characteristics (Relative risk: 5.1). Intravenous Somatostatin failed to definitively cure these complications in most cases. Seven patients (17%) (five with urethritis, two with haematuria) required cystoenteric conversion. Two patients developed post-operative ileal fistula, one cutaneous and one into the bladder. All urinary symptoms resolved in these seven patients.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of specific urinary complications is high (28%) in bladder-drained simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation patients. These complications are statistically more frequent in the case of an abnormal pre-transplant urodynamic assessment.

Successful surgical salvage of pancreas allograft

BACKGROUND

Early and late complications related to the pancreas after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) frequently result in graft loss. The authors describe a surgical rescue technique that allows salvage of the pancreatic graft when surgical complications appear after the transplant.

METHODS

Of 158 patients who underwent SKPT, 7 were identified with posttransplant complications that required surgical salvage of the pancreas allograft. The surgical salvage technique consisted of the following: pancreatoduodenectomy with conversion from whole-pancreas transplant with bladder or enteric diversion to segmental graft with duct injection (three cases) and conversion from whole-pancreas transplant with duct injection (four cases).

RESULTS

Five of seven pancreas allografts are still functioning, with a mean follow-up of 28 months (range, 6-42 months).

CONCLUSION

The described surgical treatment may be useful for surgical salvage of the pancreatic allograft, without major impairment of endocrine function.

Technical and immunologic progress in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

During the past few years the use of new immunosuppressants and refinements in surgical technique of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation have resulted in markedly improved outcomes. This is a retrospective study of 208 SPK transplants performed at Northwestern University, demonstrating the advances made at a single center that are reflective of the field at large.

METHODS

An 8.5-year time span was split into 4 distinct eras marking sequential changes in immunosuppression and surgical technique that ensued. SPK transplant outcomes of patient and graft survival and rejection rates were compared. Also examined were end points related to the changing risk profile of the recipients, as well as quality of allograft function and rates of rehospitalizations.

RESULTS

Recipients receiving tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression had patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates significantly higher than those of earlier cohorts. The elimination of corticosteroids did not reduce survival rates or increase rejection risk. The use of pancreatic exocrine enteric drainage technique over bladder drainage reduced rehospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in immunosuppression management combined with technical refinements have made SPK transplantation a safer and more effective treatment option for the diabetic, uremic patient.

Initial report of bladder carcinoma following combined bladder-drained pancreas and kidney transplantation

Although long-term survival of a functional allograft requiring long-term immunosuppressive therapy is responsible for higher incidence of non-urothelial cancers in renal allograft recipients than in normal population, the incidence of bladder cancer is uncommon and carcinoma of the bladder in the setting of combined kidney-pancreas transplantation has not been reported to date. We herein report a case of poorly differentiated invasive adeno-squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder following renal and bladder-drained pancreatic transplantation in a 44-yr-old lady with long-standing insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, which necessitated radical extirpation. Management implications are reviewed.

Urologic aspects of kidney-pancreas transplantation

The population of pancreas transplant recipients is growing steadily, and urologists most likely will be confronted with their unique anatomy and metabolic complications. The principles of diagnosis and management of these patients can be applied to other transplant recipients (e.g., heart, lung, and liver) who also are maintained on life-long immunosuppression and in whom urologic pathology develops commensurate with the incidence in the general population.

Arterial mycotic aneurysm rupture following kidney-pancreatic transplantation with exocrine pancreatic drainage into the bladder: an unusual observation

In this case report, we describe two patients who received a kidney-pancreatic transplant through technique of exocrine pancreatic drainage into the bladder, and who subsequently developed arterial mycotic aneurysms at the site of the arterial anastomosis of the homograft.

Our experience with Roux-Y intestinal drainage in simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation

Enteric drainage is a sound surgical technique in SKP, and it avoids the majority of urological as well as metabolic complications. We did not see an increase in intraabdominal complications or of graft loss due to rejection. Intestinal leak is rare and easily managed provided a Roux-Y loop of jejunum is used. Even though the number of patients was small and the follow-up short, the results of the RY group were at least comparable to the BD group. In view of our results, we plan to use this technique in all our future SKP patients.

Pseudoaneurysm of the Y-graft/iliac artery anastomosis following pancreas transplantation: a case report and review of the literature

Transplant-related aneurysms are an unusual complication following pancreas transplantation. We present a case of a pseudoaneurysm developing in a recipient 6 months after bladder-drained pancreas transplantation. The pseudoaneurysm was incidentally found during ultrasonographic evaluation in preparation for a pancreas biopsy. Angiography demonstrated that the origin of the pseudoaneurysm was located near the base of the Y-graft/iliac artery anastomosis. Surgical repair was performed using standard vascular techniques. The patient subsequently recovered without loss of graft exocrine or endocrine function. Review of the literature revealed that aneurysms of various types associated with pancreas transplantation have a high incidence of graft loss and contribute significantly to patient morbidity. However, with prompt diagnostic and surgical management, non-infected pseudoaneurysms can be repaired without loss of pancreatic function.

Portal venous and enteric exocrine drainage versus systemic venous and bladder exocrine drainage of pancreas grafts: clinical outcome of 40 consecutive transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that pancreas transplantation using the more physiologic method of portal venous-enteric (PE) drainage could be performed without compromising patient and graft outcome, compared with the standard method of systemic venous-bladder (SB) drainage.

METHODS

Between November 1995 and November 1998, the authors prospectively followed up 20 consecutive patients with SB drainage followed by 20 consecutive patients with PE drainage. All patients underwent simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, and all were immunosuppressed with antilymphocyte serum, cyclosporin, azathioprine, and steroids.

RESULTS

The actuarial patient survival rate at 1 year was 95% in the SB group and 100% in the PE group. Death-censored kidney graft survival was 100% in both groups; pancreas graft survival was 95% in the SB group and 100% in the PE group. The mean initial hospital stay was 15 days for both groups. However, during the first 6 months after transplantation, the SB group required more medical day-unit visits, mostly for treatment of metabolic acidosis and dehydration. The incidence of urinary tract infections was similar in both groups. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infections was significantly less in the PE group. The incidence of acute rejection was 37% in the SB group and 15% in the PE group. Mean serum creatinine levels 6 months after transplantation were significantly lower in the PE group than in the SB group. Glycemic control was excellent in both groups, but fasting serum insulin levels were significantly lower in the PE group.

CONCLUSIONS

The PE method of pancreas transplantation can be performed with excellent patient and graft outcomes.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in the mycophenolate mofetil/tacrolimus era: evolution from induction therapy with bladder drainage to noninduction therapy with enteric drainage

BACKGROUND

In the past, enteric drainage or the omission of induction immunotherapy has been shown to be predictive of suboptimal outcomes of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. We have reassessed the need for bladder drainage and induction immunotherapy to optimize the outcome of SPK transplantation.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive recipients of SPK transplants who received mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus immunosuppression were studied. The first 50 recipients had bladder-drained pancreas allografts and received induction immunotherapy. The results were compared with the next 50 recipients who had enteric-drained pancreas allografts, which included a subgroup (n = 17 patients) who were randomized to receive no induction immunotherapy.

RESULTS

The 1-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates in the bladder-drainage group were 98.0%, 94.0%, and 94.0%, respectively. The 1-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates in the enteric-drainage group were 96.8%, 96.8%, and 89.4%, respectively. In the enteric-drainage group, the incidence of rejection at 1 year was 6.1% in recipients who received induction therapy versus 23.5% in recipients who did not receive induction therapy. The average number of readmissions per recipient was 1.8 in the bladder-drainage group versus 0.9 in the enteric-drainage group.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary enteric drainage of the pancreas allograft in recipients of SPK transplantation is the preferred surgical technique in the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil era.

Hospital charges following simultaneous kidney--pancreas transplantation: enteric drainage versus bladder drainage

BACKGROUND

Enteric drainage (ED) is associated with reduced morbidity compared with bladder drainage (BD) after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) and is becoming increasingly common (more than 50% of SKPTs done in the US in 1998 were performed with enteric drainage). Although several studies have reported the morbidity and graft survival of ED compared with BD previously, there are limited data available comparing the length of stay and hospital charges between these two drainage procedures.

METHODS

Fourteen SKPTs were performed during the period January 1995 May 1998 using BD and 20 during June 1998-August 1999 using ED. Hospital charges analyzed included the following categories: pharmacy, inpatient room, laboratory, operating room, medical surgical supply, radiology/nuclear medicine, and miscellaneous. Organ acquisition charges and professional fees were not included in this analysis.

RESULTS

The mean hospital stay for patients with ED was 7.8+/-2.2 d (range 5-12 d; median 7.5 d) compared with 15.9+/-7 d (range 8-38 d; median 15 d) for patients with BD (p = 0.002). The mean hospital charges during initial hospitalization for the ED group were $36 582+/-11 424 compared with $64 555+/-29 054 for the BD group (p = 0.005). There was a significant decrease in the charges relating to pharmacy, inpatient room, laboratory, radiology/nuclear medicine, and miscellaneous category in the ED group compared with the BD group, while the charges relating to operating room and medical-surgical supply were no different between the two groups. One-year actuarial kidney and pancreas graft survival rates were 83% and 93%, respectively, for the BD group and 90% and 80%, respectively, for the ED group (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

SKPT patients with ED had a 43% reduction in hospital charges and equivalent pancreas and kidney graft survival rates compared with SKPT patients with BD. A shorter hospital stay and a reduction in pharmacy, radiology/nuclear medicine, and laboratory charges contributed to the decreased hospital charges in SKPT patients with ED.

Imaging urologic complications of pancreas transplantation with bladder drainage

Urologic complications of bladder-drained pancreas transplants include cystitis, duodenitis and urethritis; duodenal ulceration and perforation; and periallograft fluid collections. These complications are readily depicted radiographically, and their recognition may be crucial for patient management.

A prospective comparison of systemic-bladder versus portal-enteric drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

Most pancreas transplants are performed with systemic venous delivery of insulin and bladder drainage of the exocrine secretions (systemic-bladder [S-B]). To develop a more physiologic procedure, we performed pancreas transplantations with portal venous delivery of insulin and enteric drainage of the exocrine secretions (portal-enteric [P-E]).

METHODS

During an 11-month period, we prospectively alternated 32 consecutive pancreas transplant recipients to either S-B (n = 16) or P-E (n = 16) drainage with standardized immunosuppression.

RESULTS

Patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation were 91% S-B versus 92% P-E, 91% S-B versus 92% P-E, and 82% S-B versus 92% P-E, respectively. Pancreas graft survival rates after solitary pancreas transplantation were 80% S-B versus 75% P-E. There were no graft losses either to immunologic or infectious complications in either group, but the incidence of acute rejection was slightly higher in the S-B group (44% S-B vs 31% P-E, P = NS). The cost and length of the initial hospital stay were similar between groups. The incidence of operative complications, major infections, and cytomegalovirus infections were likewise comparable. However, the S-B group was characterized by a slight increase in the number of readmissions, urinary tract infections, and urologic complications. Furthermore, metabolic acidosis and dehydration were more common in the S-B group.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreas transplantation with P-E drainage can be performed with short-term results comparable to those of transplantation with S-B drainage.